Quoted: On Lincoln And Historical Whitewashing

Lest I be accused—as I already have been—of imposing some kind of PC orthodoxy on a piece of mass entertainment, or of applying an anachronistic standard of inclusion to a film that marches under the banner of fidelity to historical truth, let me reiterate one point and add two others. Emancipation was not a white man’s affair. It was a multiracial affair, in which blacks, slave and free, played a central role. Spielberg and Kushner are not being faithful to the historical record; they are distorting it. Not by lying but by constructing the field glasses through which they would have us look at, and misperceive, the past.

Aaron Bady will be blogging about the film, too, so I don’t want to steal his thunder. But he’s dug up two interesting factoids that are relevant: First, Spielberg was originally thinking of making a film about the relationship between Lincoln and the black abolitionist Frederick Douglass. This is a topic that has generated a large and growing literature. Spielberg opted not to go that route. Second, though Spielberg chose to base the film on Doris Kearns Goodwin’s “Team of Rivals”, he decided essentially to use three pages from the book as the basis of his story. It was his decision to focus on the few months that led to the passage of the 13th Amendment in the House.

These unforced choices—his choices—effectively precluded the inclusion of blacks as political agents in their own right. It was not the constraints of history or genre, in other words, that produced this film; it was the blinkered vision of Steven Spielberg.

– From “Steven Spielberg’s White Men of Democracy,” by Corey Robin

[h/t @SugarKovalczyk]

About This Blog

Racialicious is a blog about the intersection of race and pop culture. Check out our daily updates on the latest celebrity gaffes, our no-holds-barred critique of questionable media representations, and of course, the inevitable Keanu Reeves John Cho newsflashes.

Latoya Peterson (DC) is the Owner and Editor (not the Founder!) of Racialicious, Arturo García (San Diego) is the Managing Editor, Andrea Plaid (NYC) is the Associate Editor. You can email us at team@racialicious.com.

The founders of Racialicious are Carmen Sognonvi and Jen Chau. They are no longer with the blog. Carmen now runs Urban Martial Arts with her husband and blogs about local business. Jen can still be found at Swirl or on her personal blog. Please do not send them emails here, they are no longer affiliated with this blog.

Comments on this blog are moderated. Please read our comment moderation policy.

Use the "for:racialicious" tag in del.icio.us to send us tips. See here for detailed instructions.

Interested in writing for us? Check out our submissions guidelines.

Follow Us on Twitter!

Support Racialicious

The Octavia Butler Book Club

The Octavia Butler Book Club
(Click the book for the latest conversation)

Recent Comments

Feminism for Real – Jessica, Latoya, Andrea

Feminism for Real

Yes Means Yes – Latoya

Yes Means Yes

Sex Ed and Youth – Jessica

Youth and Sexual Health

OMLN

Online Media Legal Network

Recent Posts

Support Racialicious

Older Archives

Tags

Written by:

  • Anonymous

    I’ve heard rave reviews about this film. Beyond the whitewashing addressed by Corey Robin, I wonder if it covered Lincoln’s own racism. Not to say that he wasn’t a great man, but would be interesting to explore his faults as well.

    • Anonymous

      The film’s timeframe was small enough that the audience didn’t get to see Lincoln’s views on race evolve. Radical Republicans were shown to be concerned that Lincoln may have prioritized ending the war over ending slavery; one cites a Lincoln speech implying that blacks and whites were not equal, and another points out immediately that the quote was years old and that his views have changed. Lincoln’s personal racism was only covered in a few lines of dialogue and the film already begins with him holding personal anti-racist beliefs. The film did acknowledge that a lot of whites who favored emancipation were deeply racist, and they opposed slavery because of perceived economic benefits or that it would end the war.

    • Anonymous

      The film’s timeframe was small enough that the audience didn’t get to see Lincoln’s views on race evolve. Radical Republicans were shown to be concerned that Lincoln may have prioritized ending the war over ending slavery; one cites a Lincoln speech implying that blacks and whites were not equal, and another points out immediately that the quote was years old and that his views have changed. Lincoln’s personal racism was only covered in a few lines of dialogue and the film already begins with him holding personal anti-racist beliefs. The film did acknowledge that a lot of whites who favored emancipation were deeply racist, and they opposed slavery because of perceived economic benefits or that it would end the war.

    • piedra negra

      I just saw the film last night. I kept on waiting for Lincoln to talk about his plans to ship all black folks back to Africa. There was an opportunity to make that plain during a discussion about reconstruction, but Tony Kushner, elected an allusion. The opening of the film was ridiculous except for the Black soldier turning his back on Lincoln while reciting the end of the Gettysburg Address. It’s a beautiful film. Daniel Day Lewis and Sally Fields are magnificent. But, I left feeling frustrated and talking kinda loud about Lincoln’s racism and his plan, along with Francis Scott Keys, to ship all of us to Liberia and how Lincoln believed that white people would not be fighting if it weren’t for our presence in the country. Folks, white and Hispanic looked at me kinda funny, but I didn’t care. There’s enough lying about about history in the the U.S. … I think that’s one reason why we are so f’d up.

      What I did appreciate about the film is that it showed just how invested white Northerners were in keeping the U.S. a white supremacist nation and that right wing Republicans in 2012 are not that different from their 1865 conservative Republican counterparts.

  • http://twitter.com/TychaBrahe TychaBrahe

    But…but…then there’d have to be black actors. And there’s only Morgan Freeman, after all, and he’s probably busy somewhere with penguins. THEY HAD TO DO IT THIS WAY.