On National Tragedy And Personal Identity: Reflections On The Shootings In Wisconsin

Well, that’s my dad you’re ostracizing. That’s my dad you’re humiliating. That’s my dad that you’re questioning. And I’m his son. So what does that make me? When I walk down the street, perceived only vaguely as South Asian, few assume I’m going to blow them up into pieces, so why should anyone assume the same about my father, my uncles, my cousins, or any member of that community–my community?

It’s been an iterative and evolutionary process. Through my admittedly elitist, though rather cherished, liberal arts education, I began to find a framework within which to fit, analyze, and conclude Stuff about My Life and The World. This, I believe, is the same framework that has enabled our friend Harsha to posit that “[the] suggestion that the killings were senseless attempts to construct the shooting as random and without logic” is in fact baseless, “when in fact racist hate crimes operate through the very deliberate and precise logic of white supremacy.”

This “othering”–through the lenses of racial supremacy doctrines, Islamaphobia, and, of course, fear of being “taken over”–is not something to which I am a casual party. It is an inherent influence on identity–one that cannot be divorced from experience, pain, and dare I say it–pride.

Since Sunday, while walking around the various enclaves of “progressive” Washington, D.C. where I live and work, I cannot help but just feel angry. My savvy sartorial choices that I know build my cachet around this town when I am observed (the “gaze of privilege”) stand in stark contrast to what I now feel is a gaping hole atop my head.

From the office to coffee to lunch to the pharmacy to the bank, and back–the mundane journey of an employed, educated young professional–I couldn’t help but feel naked and fitful under the weight of a turban that doesn’t exist and a beard whose only trace is my day-old stubble.

I am not a religious person. I have spent a long enough period of my life studying religion and I understand, appreciate, laud, and deride the various roles it has and continues to play in both bridging and dividing not just people, but also places and thought.

And yet today, of all days, I am a Sikh. I want nothing more than to wear a turban and grow a beard and walk down the streets of DC–certainly no Oak Creek–but my no means any less uncomfortable with bearded, turbaned men, and declare to the barista and to the clerk that yes, I am the Other and no, I will not be afraid.

Amit S. Bagga is the Manager of Business Operations for the No Kid Hungry Campaign at Share our Strength, a Washington, D.C.-based national non-profit organization that works with state and local governments, private industry, and other non-profit groups to end childhood hunger in the United States. Formerly, Bagga served on the staff of former US Representative Anthony Weiner in both New York and Washington for several years, primarily managing immigration, LGBTQ, and South Asian affairs policy issues. He is a native New Yorker and has been active in advocacy and organizing on behalf of gay South Asian communities in both New York and Washington, D.C.

Page 2 of 2 | Previous page

  • sofiaaaaa

    The last sentence gave me chills. Thank you.

  • Pingback: Oak Creek: An American Tragedy?` « Intro to Women's and Gender Studies

  • - Shawn/fresh.

    Yo,

    I’m a similar positioned guy, in that my mom & dad are both Sikh in practice, and I’m not.

    We’re VERY familiar with the mistreatment of men with turbans after 9/11. Sad part is my dad is a Psychiatrist, at a Veterans hospital. He treats the very demographic of people who are most fervently after him.

    This is sortof in a nutshell a poetic summation of Sikh ideology. Help those around you, despite their predeliction to bigotry.

    Now Sikhs are there to help the weak, defend the defenseless. But these beliefs come together because these soldiers, no matter what their views, need help.

    There are other factors, like the absense of brown in media, which this site already covers so needs little mention. The tendency of Sikhs to cluster in ethnic enclaves rather than venture out. The general silence surrounding the ever more stronger Sikh voice.

    Sikhs aren’t tied together, there is no governing body. There is no authority. Sikhs are loosely tied by the Guru Granth Sahib, the text of teachings. However, without a leadership structure, there is a lack of global community. Sikhs are more of a loose brotherhood, and this is talking of Sikhs from one state to another, or country to country. The sight of the turban is a welcome one, a cue that this is a person who gets it.

    Ironically that same cue is now subverted by modern ignorance, inaccurate media, and not enough good press to even the scales. Shock, horror, anger, aggression even. Sometimes bigoted statements, or in this unfortunate case, violent acts.

    Thoughts with those who suffered the attacks, and those in turn who now feel afraid to attend Gurudwara.