Wait, The GOP is Seriously Considering Michele Bachmann?

Michele Bachmann

Last week, Michele Bachmann caused a ruckus in the black blogosphere after signing “The Marriage Vow” a uber-conservative manifesto to ensure candidates agree that they will oppose gay marriage measures once in office. The document is offensive enough on its own, but it got a little extra juice from this inclusion:

Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.

This makes me wonder have these people read anything at all about slavery. Did they know that slaves were considered chattel? Property, not people? And under such considerations, not allowed to legally wed? Do they even know what jumping the broom is? (Historically, black slaves jumped the broom into the land of matrimony, since many slaves were denied traditional weddings since they were considered property.) Did they miss the fact that children and families were routinely sold away from each other, breaking the bonds of family? What kind of revisionist bullshit were they reading? That whole “blacks were better off during slavery” lie has a ridiculous hold on the GOP. But I suppose this is what happens when we start re-writing history books and sanitizing what happened.

To add insult to injury, the Marriage Vow follows that steaming pile up with a glowing reference to the Moynihan report, and quickly points out the white community has exceeded those crisis levels (and the black community is doomed). Oh, the humanity!

But Bachmann signed this thing, and so far, it’s rolling off her like Teflon. Many Black conservatives, pleased with the message Bachmann endorsed with her signature, believe she’s speaking some kind of truth to power.

So, of course, the first thing I’m wondering is if there’s any policy behind all of Bachmann’s posturing, and surprisingly there is. And to my horror, it’s gonna be really appealing to social conservatives.

Bachmann hasn’t yet dropped an official platform (her Presidency page has an issues section that leaves a lot to be desired), so we can only piece together policy points from what she’s done. Since she signed “The Marriage Vow,” she’s promised not to cheat on her spouse, to only appoint strict “Constitutionalists” to the Supreme Court, to protect “the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy,” rejection of “Sharia Islam” (yes, that’s what they wrote, Sharia ISLAM not LAW), and first amendment protection from those of us who would have the nerve to point out that we wouldn’t necessarily want to live under someone else’s religious doctrine.

Other bits are more interesting. The Free Republic reported on an April address given to the Americans for Prosperity Forum which outlined some of her other key beliefs:

  • Reinstate 1994 welfare reform act with 5 year lifetime cap (Latoya’s NoteThey meant this 1996 act. The pilot programs started in 1994)
  • Federal government would send letter to every state announcing it will not bail out any underfunded public employee union pension or healthcare plan
  • No more federal ownership of private business – put Fannie and Freddie on the auction block; end future federally backed mortgage securities
  • Sell government share in AIG, Chrysler, GM, Bank of America and Citibank
  • Legalize private student lending, end federal government involvement in student loan business

  • Repeal Obamacare; allow Americans to purchase any healthcare policy they want from any state with no minimum mandates using tax free dollars and fully deductable on tax returns; tort reform
  • Downsize EPA; no cap & trade; legalize all American energy production, all without federal subsidy
  • Cut business tax rate to 9%
  • No capital gains tax, no inheritance tax, no alternative minimum tax
  • Pass a “mother of all repeal bills” to repeal the last 4 years of Obama/Pelosi/Reid
  • And it gets so much worse when you look at her decisions while she was in Congress:

    Prohibit federal funding to groups like Planned Parenthood. (Jan 2011)
    Grant the pre-born equal protection under 14th Amendment. (Jan 2007)
    Report on Medicaid payments to abortion providers. (Apr 2009)
    Declare preborn as persons under 14th amendment. (Feb 2009)
    Voted NO on modifying bankruptcy rules to avoid mortgage foreclosures. (Mar 2009)
    Voted NO on regulating the subprime mortgage industry. (Nov 2007)
    Authored constitutional amendment defining marriage. (Nov 2006)
    Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation. (Nov 2007)
    Voted NO on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)
    Voted NO on tax credits for renewable electricity, with PAYGO offsets. (Sep 2008)
    Voted NO on tax incentives for energy production and conservation. (May 2008)
    Voted NO on tax incentives for renewable energy. (Feb 2008)
    Voted NO on investing in homegrown biofuel. (Aug 2007)
    Voted YES on criminalizing oil cartels like OPEC. (May 2007)
    Voted NO on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies. (Jan 2007)
    Bar greenhouse gases from Clean Air Act rules. (Jan 2009)
    Cap-and-trade has no impact on global temperatures. (Jul 2010)
    Voted NO on $9.7B for Amtrak improvements and operation thru 2013. (Jun 2008)
    Endorsed Targeted as “Dirty Dozen” for anti-environmentalism. (Aug 2010)
    Voted YES on promoting free trade with Peru. (Nov 2007)
    Voted NO on assisting workers who lose jobs due to globalization. (Oct 2007)
    Voted NO on protecting whistleblowers from employer recrimination. (Mar 2007)
    Voted NO on regulating tobacco as a drug. (Apr 2009)
    Voted NO on expanding the Children’s Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)
    Voted NO on restricting employer interference in union organizing. (Mar 2007)
    Voted NO on increasing minimum wage to $7.25. (Jan 2007)

    Some things are somewhat in opposition. The Marriage Vow actually requests that candidates remove the marriage penalty from welfare law and policy, but she wants to push welfare policy to 1996 era reform, which had those policies that discouraged families from forming due to economic penalties written into the code. But that’s a small matter.

    Bachmann, who might as well just write “Fuck all y’all” as her campaign platform, is a serious frontrunner for the GOP, and embraced by the party faithful. With Democratic unity in shambles, Bachmann may be a game changer in the next election. And that is extremely depressing commentary on the current state of American politics. Unabashed bigots may run for office, unimpeded by their horrific views or their terrible, anti-American policies, yet wrap themselves in the flag and claim to love this country.

    Fellow Progressives, we need a plan.

    • Pingback: The New Gay » Politics: Marcus Bachmann and His Complicated Covert Closet

    • ALICIA9706

      TO PUT IT BLOUNT. REPUBLICANS WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH HELPING “ANYONE” OF COLOR PERIOD. THEY WANT TO GET MR. OBAMA OUT OF OFFICE SO BAD, THEY WILL TRY ANYTHING….AND IT ALL WILL BACKFIRE IN THEIR FACE!!!!!!!!!!

    • Pingback: The Week As We Read It | Canonball

    • Soulsentwined

      “Legalize private student lending, end federal government involvement in student loan business”

      I can’t see middle class people going along with this

    • EinSC

      BAT. SHIT. CRAZY.

      Also this: “the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy,” Who wrote that? A suppressed romance novelist?  Maybe it was former SC Board of Education Chairwoman Kristin Maguire (Republican, of course), who resigned in 2009 after a political blog revealed she wrote incest-themed internet porn under the name “Bridget Keeney.”
      Yes, people, an incest-themed porn writer wielded major influence over the education of children in my state.
      Family values, ya know.

    • Anonymous

      Is her husband going to sign this marriage vow as well? 

      The way I see it, the men in politics can get away with infidelity without people thinking less of them as politicians. So maybe someone should just send a stripper to her house and we can call this case closed. 

      Cause I never hear about a female politician cheating on her husband and going by unscathed. So I think any accusation of infidelity would just ruin her chances. 

      • EinSC

        You haven’t been following South Carolina politics.  Our governatrix Nikki Haley (aka Trikki Nikki, Teflon Nikki, Nasty Nikki) has been accused of several affairs (and two of the men have signed affidavits with details) – these accusations came out before the election and continue to persist. In fact, one of the men is writing a book. And there are reports of her attending strip clubs with her husband in Myrtle Beach, SC, and in Chicago – and supposedly enjoying lap dances.
        But hey, she’s photogenic, arrogant, speaks in bumper stickers, refuses to talk to the local media (national only, please – a favorite on Fox naturally), etc., so she got elected – barely.

    • Anonymous

      My plan, and how it’s to be implemented I don’t yet know, is to run an actual socialist social-justice-ist candidate for President, and trumpet far and wide that said candidate is an actual socialist and actually cares about social justice, unlike Obama. That way we can elect the moderate Republican candidate, Obama, instead of the wingnut, whoever the GOP runs.

    • http://chaosthethird.wordpress.com Kermit

      The plan is… stop participating in the two-party system.  The GOP is vile and reprehensible, and so are the Democrats – they’re just not as overt about it.  What site am I…oh racialicious, good, so I can say this…

      If politics were racists (heh), then the GOP would be the KKK, and the Democrats would be the ones who are in denial about their racism.  Hell, is this even an analogy at all?

      The two parties are as fractured as they’ve ever been, and I think now might be a good time for REAL progressives to put their weight behind REAL candidates – i.e. third party candidates.  The U.S. is, I think, the only “democratic” country that only has two viable options, and really not even that, since the difference between the Dems and the GOP are minimal.

    • Olivia

      She is vile, and progressives do need to stay on top of her for all of the obvious reasons, but I still don’t think she’s much of a threat to Obama. The fatal flaw of the Tea Party is that they’ve convinced themselves that finding plenty of neighbors willing to join them in ineffectually gnashing their teeth over a black president makes them messianic heroes riding the crest of the revolution. In reality there is no wave behind them. These people have always been in the Republican Party, and most of the country finds them as abhorrent as ever. But the party has allowed them to seize a disproportionate amount of visibility over the last few years, and now they’re going to regret it. The only moderate they have to offer at the moment is Mitt Romney — and the same nutcases they’ve been humoring all this time won’t vote for him because he’s a Mormon. It’s nice to see the religious right eating itself alive for a change.

    • Excellentmorgan09

      We need a pln right now!…wait, doesnt Van Jones have a plan?

    • http://lifediving.wordpress.com/ lifediving

      Great article. That the GOP is taking Bachmann seriously is baffling and terrifying (as well as darkly humorous?). Thanks for including the info about her decisions while in Congress; it was really interesting.

    • Anonymous

      It’s come out just this past week that the same pledge included a ban on pornography.  Considering how Christine O’Donnell’s campaign in Delaware practically went down on the strength of the idiocy of her anti-masturbation stance, I can’t wait to see what verbal gymnastics will ensue with her trying to deny this.  Ha ha ha.

      The link is here:

      http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/07/07/263476/breaking-bachmann-pledges-to-ban-pornography/

    • Val R.

      Progressives ought to be hoping that Bachmann wins the GOP nomination because she’ll never win the approval of moderates and no moderates means no White House.

      What surprised me about Bachmann’s signing of The Marriage Vow was how little coverage of it there was in the MSM. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=806562 Nonso Christian Ugbode

      Wow, that record is astounding. Weighted completely against working people, and in favor of the rich, yet she gets to not only wrap herself in the flag but challenge the morality of people she’s likely never met. I can’t claim to know what the plan will look like for progressives, something inside me firmly believes Michele Bachmann could never be president. However I can see her getting the Republican nomination somehow, and that is when the damage will occur. Her ability to rewrite history for that Fox News – Rush Limbaugh daily loop crowd is possibly insurmountable. 

      • Anonymous

        Right? I think I found maybe six votes or statements she’s made that I agree with. But her record is amazing in the story it tells about her priorities.

    • rchap

      Rick Santorum has also signed this pledge. Obscure GOP candidate Gary Johnson has come out against it (calling it offensive, among other things) and Huntsman has stated that he will not sign it.