By Arturo R. García
Soledad O’Brien and Almighty Debt come closest to the program’s stated goal toward the end, when she asks Pastor DeForest “Buster” Soaries if he “pulled strings” to help one of his parishoners, Fred Philp, get into college, leading to this exchange:
Soaries: I picked up the phone to make sure that nothing got lost in the sauce and that Fred didn’t fall between the cracks.
O’Brien: What’s that mean, “lost in the sauce”?
Soaries: well, Fred was not your classic college applicant, and he was not heavily sought after in colleges. He had academic challenges, financial challenges, and I didn’t want to trust his high school counselors to be his primary advocates. And so when I heard that Fred was having some difficulty with the college of his choice, I thought it probably would help if I let the president know that Fred is with me.
Unfortunately, aside from that sequence and a couple of other statements later in the show, the issue is ignored. The irony of her church-oriented report is, the devil isn’t in the details – it’s in the lack thereof.
Though O’Brien’s latest Black In America special is, supposed to be another “conversation-starter” piece, she spends most of her time derailing her own story. In the opening seconds, she declares African-Americans to be “the most religious group in the United States” and the (Christian) church to be “the soul of black life in the United States.” It’s possible she’s alluding to studies of church attendance by race, like this one, or attempting to explain her approach to the story, but these statements, bereft of context or even sourcing, come off as bombastic.
The show’s biggest misstep is ignoring almost everything that is particular about the situation to the community; we get snippets of commentary regarding the misuse of programs like the G.I. Bill to exclude African-Americans from greater participation in the housing market, but otherwise, experts like Dr. Melvin Oliver of UC Santa Barbara (Black Wealth/White Wealth) and Bennett College president Dr. Julianne Malveaux make all-too-brief appearances. In one infuriating moment, Dr. Malveaux is explaining the principle of generational accumulation of wealth when O’Brien tries to finish her sentence for her, bogging down the rest of the clip.
Instead, O’Brien takes the viewer through the stories various members of the congregation at First Baptist Church of Lincoln Gardens, New Jersey, led by Soaries, a former New Jersey Secretary of State.
Though the people profiled here are sympathetic, and, as author Terrie Williams points out late in the show, courageous for allowing themselves to be seen in the midst of their struggles, O’Brien – as she did in the Latino In America mini-series – neglects to ask them crucial questions:
- Why would the Jeffries, upper-middle class by profession if not earnings before the recession affected them, seemingly wait two years before calling on the church’s foreclosure-prevention program?
- What makes them and their daughter think they’re going to be able to pay for her to attend Georgetown or Princeton or any of her other “dream schools”?
- Has Carl Fields, seen with a stack of hundreds of applications, considered freelancing or temporary employment to supplement his regular job search?
- And why is young Fred relying more on the church’s youth minister in his ill-defined quest to attend Kean University, when his school guidance counselor could tell him “his C grades” – as described almost derisively by O’Brien – would probably be good enough to get him into a junior college, where he could continue his education with far less pressure and debt than at a four-year university?
- Furthermore, why would his pastor distrust professional educators, who might have agreed with him that Fred would have to get a job and take out student loans to afford to study at Kean?
As the program’s narrative portion closes, by which point we see Soaries step in to help Fields meet with potential employers and attempt to act as a surrogate landlord for the Jeffries, O’Brien declares that he’s been doing what the church has been doing for decades. But, again, without much of any historical sourcing over the preceding hour, other than the requisite MLK images, O’Brien lets the matter drop.
Soaries is also featured during the show-closing “town hall” question, but it’s telling that no economists are included in the discussion; neither are educators Malveaux and Oliver. Instead, he’s joined by Bishop T.D. Jakes, leader of The Potter’s House in Dallas, along with Williams, Washington Post columnist Michelle Singletary and Democratic pollster Cornell Belcher, who contributes nothing of note. Frankly, O’Brien squanders another opportunity to ask some good questions of both Soaries and Jakes:
- Do they both “make calls” to make sure everyone who asks doesn’t get “lost in the sauce”?
- Is it ethical of them to use their position as leverage in a case like Fred’s? What if he can’t handle the strain?
- Will their churches use their membership and economic resources as recruitment tools?
- What if they each find themselves “making calls” on behalf of students applying to the same school?
It’s fitting to learn on Halloween week that O’Brien’s next project will be called Muslim In America. Because given her history, that’s a legitimately scary prospect.
About This BlogRacialicious is a blog about the intersection of race and pop culture. Check out our daily updates on the latest celebrity gaffes, our no-holds-barred critique of questionable media representations, and of course, the inevitable
Keanu ReevesJohn Cho newsflashes.
Latoya Peterson (DC) is the Owner and Editor (not the Founder!) of Racialicious, Arturo García (San Diego) is the Managing Editor, Andrea Plaid (NYC) is the Associate Editor. You can email us at email@example.com.
The founders of Racialicious are Carmen Sognonvi and Jen Chau. They are no longer with the blog. Carmen now runs Urban Martial Arts with her husband and blogs about local business. Jen can still be found at Swirl or on her personal blog. Please do not send them emails here, they are no longer affiliated with this blog.
Comments on this blog are moderated. Please read our comment moderation policy.
Use the "for:racialicious" tag in del.icio.us to send us tips. See here for detailed instructions.
Interested in writing for us? Check out our submissions guidelines.
Follow Us on Twitter!
- Hyatt on A Few Thoughts On Star Trek: Into Darkness
- Marie on The Rise Of Beyoncé, The Fall Of Lauryn Hill: A Tale Of Two Icons
- aboynamedart on A Few Thoughts On Star Trek: Into Darkness
- aboynamedart on A Few Thoughts On Star Trek: Into Darkness
- Tamara Brooks on The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly: Pilot Season 2013-2014
- Race + Higher Ed: Fear not, Suzy. You’re still #1!
- Table For Two: Star Trek Into Darkness
- Watch: Fruitvale Station Has A Trailer And An Opening Date
- Short but Sweet: Kim Ho’s The Language Of Love
- Will Best Man Holiday Usher In A New Golden Era Of Black Rom-coms?
- Book Excerpt: “Seeing Things” from Godless Americana
- Race + TV: Four Summer Shows From Across The Pond
- A Few Thoughts On Star Trek: Into Darkness
TagsABC activism advertising african-american asian asian-american barack obama black blackface celebrities comedy culture diversity fashion feminism film gender glbt HBO hip hop hispanic history hollywood identity international interracial relationships latino media mixed race movies music muslim politics race racial stereotypes racism religion sex sexism sexual stereotypes stereotypes tv Uncategorized white youtube