An Open Letter to Racebending.com Detractors

By Guest Contributor Michael Le, cross-posted from Racebending.com

I’d like the chance to explain what Racebending.com is about. Why are we boycotting Paramount’s The Last Airbender? Why are we angry about the production’s casting practices?

I think there’s a lot of misunderstanding here and my hope is that if you have the time to read my piece, you’ll find that we’re reasonable folks with valid concerns. We’re not just whistle-blowing PC police or crazy “reverse racists.”

Even if I don’t convince you to go out and buy a Racebending shirt, I hope that by the end, you respect our position more, and can understand where we’re coming from even if you don’t agree.

If you’re pressed for time and the length of this piece annoys you, we have a five-minute video series explaining our position, though it won’t address everything in this piece: http://www.racebending.com/v3/featured/the-last-airbender-film-how-to-talk-about-it-video-series/”>Why Are People Upset About Airbender?

WHY THIS ISSUE MATTERS
Sometimes it’s hard to see why something as trivial as a film matters. Why video games are important or how comic books can shape our lives.

In a given week, the average American child spends less than forty minutes in meaningful conversation with their parents. In the same week, he or she will also spend sixteen hundred and eighty minutes watching television.

In a given year, an American child will spend 900 hours in school – and 1500 hours watching television.
(source: http://www.csun.edu/science/health/docs/tv&health.html by Norman Herr, PhD Professor of Science and Education)

Clearly, children spend a great deal of time consuming media. It helps shape how they view the world and themselves. In the states, we find it very easy to fight the gender stereotypes they may be exposed to. We tell our daughters that they can grow up to be doctors or lawyers or presidents, and that they are just as capable as any boy.

But in America, we’re very skittish about the subject of race. We like to stick to vague statements like “Everybody is equal” – a lofty and admirable statement, to be sure, but abstract and tough for a child to grasp.

When we don’t talk to our children about race, they draw their own conclusions, and one of their main sources of information about the world is media.

The kind of concepts children internalize about themselves is demonstrated in a study known as the doll test, initially conducted to help end segregation in the states, and performed again in more recent years:
http://www.racebending.com/v3/background/do-children-see-race/

AREN’T WE ALL EQUAL NOW?
About once a month, someone asks me some variant of this question: “Where are you from?”

“San Diego,” I’ll say.

“No,” comes the response. “Where are you REALLY from?”

There are more folks of Asian descent living in the United States than there are people in the entire country of Holland. My English is flawless (insofar as I’m a Californian with zealous overuse of the word “like”). Many of the folks who ask me this question I consider friends. And I’m not saying “Oh, look how racist everyone is.”

What I am saying is that Asian Americans aren’t really thought of as American. One of my close friends has a straight-up Brooklyn accent. He was telling a coworker that he used to serve in the army.

The response?

“Oh, cool. The Chinese army?”

It’s easy to draw comparisons between the Airbender casting and an English actor playing an Irish one, or a Spanish actor playing an Italian actor. But it’s not really the same, and the reason is that Hollywood and media don’t consider whether an actor is Irish or Spanish or English. They think of that actor as “white.” The same is not true of actors who are Asian or Latino, who have to fight over the few roles specifically written for those ethnicities. And a lot of times, even when a role is steeped in Asian culture, even when a role is based on real-life individuals of Asian descent, those roles still go to white actors.

Does it happen the other way, where a “white” role is given to a person of color? Sometimes. But I think this is a case where the exceptions prove the rule:

Over the last ten years, 86% of Paramount’s lead actors have been white. In fact, of the 54 films released or announced for 2010 and on, 83% of Paramount’s leads are white males. From 2000 to 2009, Paramount didn’t produce a single movie starring a Latino, Asian American, or Native American actor. There’s a phrase for numbers like these: glass ceiling.

http://www.racebending.com/v3/featured/paramount-pictures-diversity-in-the-21st-century/

Pretty messed up… but Hollywood’s a business, after all. They want to appeal to their main demographic: white males. Right?

MARKETABILITY
katara1Hollywood is a business and we don’t dispute that. What we dispute is the idea that somehow, people of color are not as marketable as Caucasian actors. Will Smith, for example, is the number one box office draw in America, and has been for the better part of a decade.

The Last Airbender is a great example, because the most well-known actor of the top four roles is Dev Patel – an actor of Indian descent. In contrast, the lead roles of Aang and Katara went to unknown Caucasian actors. Noah Ringer was, in fact, chosen for his martial arts ability – not his acting ability. He was sent to an “acting bootcamp” before filming started.

When a casting call is released that says “Caucasian or any other ethnicity” wanted – as Airbender’s casting call read – it biases the entire process.
http://www.racebending.com/v3/background/caucasian-or-any-other-ethnicity/

Imagine you are a casting agent and you see a casting call that reads “AFRICAN or any other ethnicity” wanted. You have a vast pool of actors to choose from to send to this audition. You don’t want to waste anyone’s time and you want to give the production what they’re seeking. How likely are you to send this call sheet to your black actors? To your Asian actors? To your white actors?

So Americans of Asian descent don’t have a chance to prove themselves, even when the role in question is steeped in Asian culture and context. Asian actors have proven successful in countless other martial arts films, both in America and abroad.

Hollywood is a business, but it is still run by people who have certain worldviews. Most Hollywood films are marketed toward men. But the American movie-going audience is 55% female. Only 45% of people buying tickets are men, but Hollywood is clinging to a marketing mindset from the 1930s, and they’re losing out on a lot of business.

If 55% of movie tickets are being bought by women now, even when films are hardly marketed to them, how much money could Hollywood make if they started focusing more on this demographic?

And just as Hollywood holds onto this bias toward male movie-goers, so too are they stuck on this notion that actors of color can’t carry film. The television industry is catching up: look at the big-hitters recently. You have successful programs like Lost, Glee, and Community with very diverse casts. You have children’s programming like Ni Hao Kai Lan and Dora the Explorer.

And when audiences have a choice of who they want to watch? You only have to look at the success of Asian American performers in reality television like America’s Best Dance Crew. On YouTube, the single most successful star is Japanese American. When audiences have a choice and a vote and a say in what they want to watch – they’re just as happy to choose Asian American as white American.

So the message to Hollywood is: we know that you’ve always used Caucasian actors for almost every big role. You’re used to it. But the Western world is changing. We have a biracial African American president and a Muslim Miss USA.

To production companies out there: tap into the audiences that your competitors are ignoring! Americans care about seeing media that reflects the world we truly live in. Half of Racebending.com supporters are Caucasian – because audiences can relate to transforming robots, giant blue aliens, kung fu pandas. And yes, even to Asian faces.

I hope you were at least able to skim it for the big points. And I hope you have a better understanding of where we’re coming from.

Either way, thanks a lot for reading.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Racialicious.com – Open Letter to Racebending.com Detractors -July 2nd, 2010 :: The Last Airbender Movie Casting | Activism at Racebending.com on 03 Jul 2010 at 7:11 pm

    [...] July 2nd, Racialicious.com published “An Open Letter to Racebending.com Detractors, written by Racebending.com organizer and spokesperson Mike [...]

Comments

  1. Michelle wrote:

    I won’t be paying money to go see this movie.

    Unfortunately, I am having a tougher time convincing the younger (10-15 yo) people in my family to boycott. The young boy in the movie looks vaguely non-white, ala Keanu Reeves. It makes it harder for me to make my point to a die hard Air Bender fan.

    Do we think that if this movie still makes a ton of money because of the built in audience that it will make it harder for Hollywood to listen the next time they make a movie like this?

  2. Iggles wrote:

    Thank you for this post. It sums up perfectly why some many people are offended by the whitewashing of films like Avatar: the Last Airbender, 21, Prince of Persia, etc. And why it’s important that POC are represented more in film/media.

    I’m happy to see as this movie heads to theater that more MSM publications are covering the protest. I saw an article about the other day on AOL. AOL!! Sadly, many of the comments were closeminded, but still the message that this is a problem is starting to reach the mainstream. That’s a good thing.

  3. k3m15a wrote:

    And based on reviews (@rottentomatoes.com), One of the worst movies of the year, probably ever.

  4. JihadPunk77 wrote:

    Hollywood is a business and we don’t dispute that. What we dispute is the idea that somehow, people of color are not as marketable as Caucasian actors. Will Smith, for example, is the number one box office draw in America, and has been for the better part of a decade.

    also look at the huge successes of POC films such as:

    Slumdog Millionaire; Bend it like Beckham; Crouching, Tiger Hidden Dragon; Precious; ANY movies by Tyler Perry; Rush Hour; Rush Hour 2; what else?

    Please add any other huge POC hit films to the list so we can back up our arguments next time white people try arguing with us that POC actors cannot draw in large box office earnings.

  5. JihadPunk77 wrote:

    oh yes! HAROLD AND KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE, HAROLD AND KUMAR: GUANTANAMO, and there’s gonna be a 3rd forthcoming film.

  6. Elton wrote:

    *APPLAUSE*

  7. bek wrote:

    I appreciate this letter and support your cause. As an black american woman, obviously, I deeply understand your frustration and I hope that all people of color can come together to force hollywood and the american community at large, not just for proper representation but also for positive and honest reflection of who we are and the variety of positive and successful way that we live in this country. Now where’s my t-shirt!

  8. Logan wrote:

    Of note: The only time I can ever remember an actor of color getting a part written for someone who was white was when Michael Clarke Duncan played Kingpin in the Daredevil movie, and that was more because he was one of the few actors who could fit the build and act the role. I could name at least a dozen times a role written/originated for someone of color was given to a white person. And that’s not even counting cases like Neil Gaiman refusing to let Hollywood make an Anasi Boys film because they want to make all the characters white.

  9. dcmoviegirl wrote:

    By and large, the kind of people who dismiss racebending protesters outright also would not “waste their time” watching/reading that piece.

    It would wreck their colorblindness. :)

    This attitude is what decades with colorblindness a.k.a. color-avoidance as the mainstream solution to racism has wrought.

    Truly so blind that most do not see race despite many embarrassingly obvious visual and cultural markers, unless it’s the official default race, white.

  10. Mike wrote:

    Reading over this, I feel really bad that I didn’t emphasize the loss to the Native American / Inuit community.

    The media (and me, in this piece) have really perpetuated this notion of Airbender as an “Asian American” problem. It’s not. It definitely impacts the Native American community, minorities in general, and white audiences who are being pandered to because Hollywood assumes they’re racist.

  11. Restructure! wrote:

    In the states, we find it very easy to fight the gender stereotypes they may be exposed to. We tell our daughters that they can grow up to be doctors or lawyers or presidents, and that they are just as capable as any boy.

    But in America, we’re very skittish about the subject of race.

    This is absurd. It is easy for Michael Le, a man, to believe that gender stereotypes are easy to fight. As an Asian woman, I find this is yet another example of male privilege and the failure to recognize the extent of gender stereotyping in our society.

    I mean, even “geisha”, “china doll”, “dragon lady”, and “Asian whore” stereotypes are gender stereotypes, which I hope he realizes are not “easy” to fight. I don’t even need to mention the more general gender stereotypes that even more women, including Asian women, struggle with.

  12. Lizzzzzzzzz wrote:

    “If 55% of movie tickets are being bought by women now, even when films are hardly marketed to them, how much money could Hollywood make if they started focusing more on this demographic?”

    I wish it did, but I don’t actually think that this supports your argument. Women and men are taught that manly things are good and womanly things are bad. There’s more evidence that marketing to women will lose Hollywood male customers instead of winning them more female ones.

    But that doesn’t mean that marketing to women is the wrong thing to do. It’s wrong for Hollywood to take advantage of racist and sexist stereotypes to make their money.

  13. Seattle Slim wrote:

    Thank you for sharing. I’m boycotting this movie thanks to all of the work I’ve seen here and at Racebending, and even wrote about it on my blog and on my social networking sites. I refuse to have my money go to something so disgusting. Great work and keep it up!!

  14. Casual Observer wrote:

    Wonderfully written. My significant other is white and when he watched the previews on television, he asked if I’d care to see it. I said “no” and he asked me why. I told him it was an affront to the American people. It was an affront to the Asian community, that no matter what they produce, they will always be regulated to stand-by outsider status. That they can have their stories and art appropriated by white people and erased out of it. It offended all people of color actually. I told him it was also racist towards white people. Like what, white people only want to see other white people on a screen? Shamefully done. I am happy people of color are starting to stand up to the Hollyweird machine. Then the execs are gazing at each other glassy eyed and vacant wondering why people don’t go to the movies anymore. Thanks to DVD and even bootleg and downstream, people of color can be exponentially more choosy about what they see and whom they give their money to. Our voices are in their wallets. Disturb their wallets and they will hear our voices.
    When I’m sick from snow blindness after watching too many Hollyweird movies, I go light hearted or things of substance.
    I guess Hollyweird execs didn’t hear about the success of Slumdog Millionaire, City of God, or Tsotsi. I guess successful movies featuring people of color are flukes…much better to put white people in crappy movies because..well who cares about lack of plot? They’re white..and that’s what the white world wants(?) To see crappy films, great films or mediocre films. Just as long as those films contain minimum melanin. Ok, got it. I was confused for a moment. My bad.

  15. Ashton wrote:

    I appreciate most of the points that you’ve made in this essay and fully agree with the racism in casting in the movie. I just wish you could have made your points without suggesting that sexism and genderism are smaller problems than racism. There’s no need to compete around this issue! There is still plenty of sexism in Hollywood and women of all races – but especially women of color – are not often offered substantial roles.

  16. Hapa wrote:

    Karate kid is the number one box office draw right now. It’s starring east asian and black actors. With majority east asian people, since they’re in China.

  17. Aiyo wrote:

    Appluase. A lot of people are saying the movie was a flop how it was nothing like the series and how all the actors except Dev were crappy. So the excuse of “they chose the best actors.” went straight out of the window. Glad the film is failing.

  18. isityouorme? wrote:

    * slow clap*

    My mom just asked me about this movie not even ten minutes ago. I told her a bit about the protest and the fact that Ebert said it was bad. I’m going to have to send her a link to this post.

  19. Teeny Gozer wrote:

    OH THE IRONY! There’s a Tennessee Williams play called “Ten Blocks on the Camino Real” that was filmed for television back in the 60s. Most of the characters are Hispanic, except for this one white guy who finds himself in this Mexican town, like a fish out of water. The white guy was played by Martin Sheen (born”Ramon Antonio Gerard Estevez”), the entire rest of the cast was of various European backgrounds in brownface.

    Thank you for all the hard work you’ve put into this protest.

  20. Felicia wrote:

    Great bit. I decided quite awhile ago that I would not be seeing it. I appreciate the facts presented about actual percentages of the races of lead actors in Hollywood recently. I’m even more curious about the statistics surrounding the use of interracial character couples in films. At least we occasionally get a movie starring a minority, but we seldom get movies where the love interest is of a different ethnicity.

  21. Najela wrote:

    I just got finished watching the most recent Karate Kid. There was only 1 white person in that movie and it still topped the box offices. Maybe they put white people in movies they know are going to suck so they can reach a wider audience.

  22. Mike wrote:

    @Liz
    “There’s more evidence that marketing to women will lose Hollywood male customers instead of winning them more female ones. ”

    I hear this a lot, but how could anyone possibly know this? Of Paramount’s announced future films, only 6% feature an actress in the lead – and zero lead women of color.

    How could we POSSIBLY know that marketing toward women will automatically drop male audiences?

    I find it hard to believe that no kind of marketing whatsoever will attract more female viewers. Marketing is built around the idea that you can attract children, or parents, or black consumers, or Latino men aged 18-34.

    Are we seriously claiming that it’s IMPOSSIBLE to market to women and Hollywood has NO CHOICE but to market to men, and scoop up whatever women come along with that demographic?

  23. Mike wrote:

    @Ashton

    That’s a really great point. I phrased it really badly in the piece and I’m sorry for minimizing the gender problems in this country.

    Especially after watching the film, I’m hoping there’s huge uproar over how M. Night completely ruined the female characters.

    As one of my friends put it: in the film, there is never a moment when a woman proves herself to be the equal of a man. Not in intelligence, resilience, resourcefulness, or combat prowess.

    There are many feminist plot threads in the original show, and many examples of Katara taking charge and besting the most formidable of opponents in open combat. All of these instances were either (1) cut out completely or (2) re-written so a male character was the one to act.

  24. RG wrote:

    Excellent post. I had a conversation about racial representations in the media with my mother recently that focused on the casting in movies like Airbender and Prince of Persia. At first she was firmly in the camp of “This does not matter, why do you spend so much time focusing on race?”

    But, as I learned that day, this argument that the constant reinforcement that white is “normal” while the rest of us are relegated to sidekicks, villains, an general otherness colors our perceptions of people in the real world. My mother, who has in my recollection never once acknowledged that racism even exists, enthusiastically agreed with me that this made perfect sense and OF COURSE the things people see over and over, every day of their lives since birth are going to affect their worldview.

    It gives me hope that anyone can be ‘converted’, we just need to find effective ways of reaching out to them as individuals. And personally, I think your comparison to the representation of women is a fantastic way to help those who still can’t understand why these things matter.

  25. uiy wrote:

    We all know people who say “who cares? they’re not really asian because this is a fantasy”. But these are the same people who would feel affronted if movies such as LOTR or braveheart had asian actors. Look, there are no elves in real life either so why must all the elves in LOTR be played by caucasian actors? There are plenty of fair-skinned east asian actors!

    The people who say it’s no big deal that a movie decided to cast white actors to play asian characters would protest if superman were to be played by an asian-american actor. And frankly, there are plenty of asian-american males who fit the superman discription (black hair, dark eyes, glasses, light skin)

  26. Adam wrote:

    “Mike wrote:

    Reading over this, I feel really bad that I didn’t emphasize the loss to the Native American / Inuit community.

    The media (and me, in this piece) have really perpetuated this notion of Airbender as an “Asian American” problem. It’s not. It definitely impacts the Native American community, minorities in general, and white audiences who are being pandered to because Hollywood assumes they’re racist.”

    Thank you so much for mentioning this Mike. As an Inuit Canadian I loved that the Inuit people had such a large role in the original TV series. I loved that Katara was a strong Inuit woman. I was so excited at the idea of a big Hollywood version being made with Inuit people being showcased in such a positive light. Then I found out everyone (Except Dev) was white in the film. I was disgusted and disappointed. Airbender is a truly great epic story that showcases different cultures from the ones Hollywood usually shows their audience. I am so glad this movie is getting panned and I hope it truly bombs.

  27. Chris Little wrote:

    I don’t know, after reading what the director said about casting (”it’s the most racially diverse cast every presented in Hollywood”) and seeing that many writers here haven’t seen the movie, isn’t that a little ironic. I agree that Hollywood MUST do a better job of presenting all of America, and we as consumers have responsibilities to force them to change.
    But can we seriously attack the racial makeup of a cast without seeing that cast? Each nation is representative of a different ethnicity, acc. to the director. And connecting up with the anime tenet of ethnic amorphism was one of the casting goals.
    Now, I do think the movie destroyed the spirit and the meaning of the series, but every director has the right to choose their own path for an interpretation.

  28. orangejasmine wrote:

    @ Chris Little:
    I think it’s important that Mr. Le respond to your post, but I just thought I’d say – I haven’t seen the movie either, but I have most certainly seen photographs of the cast on the internet. I’ve seen the cartoon characters from having watched a couple of episodes and as they were placed side-by-side with their corresponding actors cast for the role.

    It’s blatantly obvious what is the issue here. Also, was this movie intended as a (re-)interpretation? A re-imaging of the original cartoon? Is it inherent of a screen adaptation to also be a re-interpretation or re-imaging of the original? There’s a difference, I believe. And Night Shyamalan could have used that argument in his favour a long time ago if that were in fact the case.

    That’s part and parcel of the problem here…

  29. Ei wrote:

    Chris Little

    It is “racially diverse” when the show was based off Asian and Native American culture. Yet it is “being faithful” when it comes to other fantasy films like Harry Potter and LOTR where the protagonist are white.

    And by Racial diverse, he obviously means cast 3 out of 4 protagonists as white. Have the evil empire be brown, and have the Inuits and East Asians no name background extras as people that needs to be saved by the white hero from the brown villains.

    Every director/studio/producer has their choice in how to make their movie, and some time those choices are just outright racist, this is one of them.

  30. Mike wrote:

    @Chris

    Caught a pre-screening last Monday for Asian American activists, courtesy of Paramount.

    Besides Fire Nation antagonists, a non-white character doesn’t have a single line until thirty minutes into the film.

    At that point, there are several East Asian actors who are rescued by Aang. Two of them are given lines, so they can thank him profusely for saving them. Aang even gives a little speech, pointing out to them that they are able to fight back. It smacks of “white man’s burden.”

    There is a single East Asian woman of note in the film: she massages the feet of a Fire Nation character.

    After the 15-minute period where East Asian characters talk, the action moves to the Northern Tribe, which is entirely white. From that point on, the only heroic characters to speak are white.

    Even by modern standards of tokenism, the film was incredibly awful. I would actually say that the Charlie Chan series from the 1930s and 1940s was BETTER: at least then, Charlie Chan’s son was a main sidekick, and had regular lines and fairly in-depth character development.

  31. Chanda wrote:

    For the record, Martin Sheen’s father was from Spain. Although it is telling that he changed his working name to his mother’s Irish last name because discrimination was so strong against anyone with a Hispanic last name, due to associations with Latinos.

  32. JonesJ wrote:

    Sorry to dissent here but I wanted to say that over the years I have been as incensed as any by the bizarre racial casting by Hollywood if not the outright racism in so many movies. African American sidekick, guess who dies first and dont even get me started on the depiction of non-white cultures.

    In this case, a movie by a non-white director, is being trashed across the board by the mainstream media for casting a white kid instead of an Asian actor. If you have read Japanese manga or other comics and watched anime – you must have noticed the Japanese predilection for westernizing – clothing, hair, teeth, eyes etc to the point where its really hard to tell the race of the characters.

    Yes this is an issue in Hollywood, but this is the wrong target.

    Of course it all works out because another non-Caucasian director’s film gets trashed.

    Guess who wins?

  33. Mel wrote:

    This article is very well written.

    This is a lost opportunity for Asian/Inuit actors.

    It maintains the status quo perfectly: whites= heroes/main characters/saviors.
    non-whites= victims/background characters, villains, sidekick.

    The message kids are getting is harmless to their self-esteem.

  34. Mel wrote:

    Oops, I meant the message non-whites are getting is “harmful” to their self-esteem.

  35. Tiffany wrote:

    The movie wasn’t even that great .

  36. m. wrote:

    There is a single East Asian woman of note in the film: she massages the feet of a Fire Nation character.

    WHAT. THE. FUCK.

  37. Fireball wrote:

    This movie currently has a rating of 8% on Rotten Tomatoes. Eight percent. When your movie can’t even get double digit approval, that’s something special. It’s even worse than Dragonball Evolution, and I didn’t think that was even possible. The sound that you hear is M. Night’s career crashing full speed into a brick wall.

  38. PV wrote:

    For M. Knight to call this movie racially diverse and driven is a spit in the eye. To give an analogy of what he really did to make this film racially diverse:

    M. Knight sees a child fiercely struggling to swim to shore to avoid drowning. The Paramount beach owners sees this and asks if anyone is willing to save the child! M. Knight stands up and tells how once upon a past Halloween, he and his daughter played out a her favorite drowning scene and he came to her rescue! He feels he can do the real thing. So M. Knight runs into the water…but he stops after getting in waist deep. He grabs the closest children, who are not in any danger of drowning, and pulls them to shore. M. Knight turns to the on watcher, who asks why he didn’t save the child further out, still struggling to make it to shore alone. With that, M. Knight puffs out his chest and says, “I did save the children! Didn’t you see? I saved many children from drowning!”

    The on lookers then say, “But there is still one more, struggling further out!”

    M. Knight looks back to the struggling child and looks back at the people. He shakes his head indignantly then responds with, “Why are you all so mad! I saved the children!!”

    So thanks M. Knight, you did make a racially diverse film. Too bad you failed to put the diversity where it was most important. Just as fictitious M. Knight choose to not save the child that need his help the most!

  39. Mike wrote:

    @m.

    Yeah, that really felt like M. Night flipping us off after all the hassle we’ve given him for the casting.

  40. Antre wrote:

    I’m telling my friends at school about Racebending.com and how I’m boycotting The Last Airbender, and they look at me like I’M crazy.

    Ah, well. At least I tried. Thanks for the article, Mike!

  41. miga wrote:

    You know, I think I found this site while googling Avatar (I love the series). I’ve been hooked for the past…year and a half, I think!!! Thanks everyone, for keeping up the good work on this and of course every other story!

  42. DaliSalvadorAde wrote:

    this is a true shame! I too have been advocating the boycott of this film, and as a budding theater actress myself, I am deeply offended. Unfortunately, Hollywood did the same thing a couple of years ago with the Dragonball-Z series. When it came time to make a feature length film, they chose a majority white cast! It frustrates me to no end. Why must Hollywood see we minorities as invisible?!

  43. St wrote:

    I always thought of Aang as caucasian because he had blue-grey eyes. Still – I was greatly disappointed and frankly insulted by the casting decisions made for this movie. Knowing the series, this film is an underestimation of the fans, and a deterrent to those who have never seen the original. What a disgrace.

  44. Sarah wrote:

    I agree with a lot of the backlash against this movie. However, there is one thing that bothered me when I watched the animated series: it seems like a lot of the characters in it are drawn Caucasion. Aang and most of the Air Nation monks look like white bald guys, the Water Nation people often have blue eyes and brown hair—don’t the Inuit have brown eyes and black hair? Although yes, the Fire Nation is drawn mostly Chinese/ East Asian. I mean, I know that often characters in anime don’t look any particular race at all, what with the lavender and pink hair and the green eyes, etc. Thoughts?

  45. Observer157 wrote:

    Similar complaints about racebending were made about the 21 blackjack movie starring Kevin Spacey

    http://www.8asians.com/2008/04/01/the-mit-tech-movie-21-discriminatory-casting-unjustified/

    http://tech.mit.edu/V128/N15/21casting.html

  46. Perpetual Explosion wrote:

    I take solace in the fact that this movie is probably going to flop. It has become increasingly clear that Shyamalan has forgotten how to make movies. Every movie he’s made since Signs has been a solid middle finger to each and every one of his fans from The 6th Sense. Lady in the Water and The Happening were particularly clear gestures of contempt for the audience, and this looks like part of the same trend.