Where My Sistas At? The Underrepresentation of Black Plus Size Models in Mainstream Fashion

by Guest Contributor Tasha Fierce, originally published at Red Vinyl Shoes

Something is lacking in the current push to include plus-size models in mainstream fashion publications (or “separate-but-equal” media outlets such as Vogue Italia’s “Vogue Curvy”). What’s lacking, specifically in the fashion establishment but less so in the satellite world of “fatshion” blogging, is representation of models/women of color. I want to speak specifically about black plus size models/women because there is a very particular perception of blackness conflated with female fatness as compared to other races, and it’s an identity I inhabit on a daily basis.

A popular (white) misconception is that fat is more acceptable in the black community. This is patently untrue. Hip-hop culture is often pointed to when one is making this argument. If you watch any hip-hop music videos at all, it’s clear to see that the fat on the women featured is in specific places. Booty, hips, tits. As the inimitable Sir Mix-A-Lot stated, “When a girl walks in with an itty-bitty waist and a round thing [booty] in your face, you get sprung.” (emphasis supplied) There is definitely a line between acceptable fat and unacceptable fat. Those fat women who are fortunate enough to be considered “thick” are subject to an even more extreme hypersexualization of their bodies than average sized or thin black women are. As the features considered sexually desirable not only by black men but also white men are exaggerated on a fat female body, these women are often portrayed as more sexually available, yet can also be portrayed as ghetto princess or hoochie — “Jezebel” and “Sapphire”. But cross that line dividing “thick fat” and “just fat” and you quickly enter the territory of the desexualized fat black woman: the Precious, the mammy. Let’s take the recent example of Gabourey Sidibe, who portrayed Precious, and who basically served as a dumping ground for all the issues people have with fat, specifically, black female fat. This is the type of fat black woman continually mocked by black men in drag. Namely, characters like Eddie Murphy’s Rasputia in Norbit, Tyler Perry’s Madea in any number of his movies, Martin Lawrence’s Shanaynay and Big Mama, and Jamie Foxx’s Wanda on In Living Color. These characters are either considered too old to be sexual and are subject to the mammy stereotype, or their sexuality is portrayed as a joke, something disgusting to be avoided. Clearly the black community is not the utopia of body acceptance white America often believes it to be.

Of course, the way fat is treated in the black community only reflects how fat is treated in mainstream culture and the fashion community. However, as “curvy” — not too fat, now — is becoming more acceptable in the fashion world, it’s clear the main shade of acceptable curvy is white. When Glamour magazine featured 7 nude plus size models in their November 2009 issue, only one — Anansa Sims, daughter of straight size supermodel Beverly Johnson — was black or even of color. This despite the fact that there are many more black plus size models out there, and despite the fact that the fat fashion blogosphere — an engine driving the plus sized clothing industry — is filled with examples of fat black women interested in fashion and modeling their clothes. In fact, one of the first and most popular fat fashion blogs, Young Fat & Fabulous, is run by a black woman.

So why are black, female, fat fashion bloggers, many of whom drive considerable income towards the plus size fashion industry via their blogs, not seeing themselves adequately represented in this new curvy trend? The “fatshion” movement has made it obvious to the maintream fashion establishment that there is a market out there for fashion-forward clothing in larger sizes. Any survey of the fatshion blogosphere will tell you that a great percentage of that market is black. Why are mainstream fashion mags so reluctant to include black plus size models in their spreads, and why do the “high fat fashion” retailers use all white faces as their representatives? It definitely has something to do with the aversion to using black straight size models on runways and in fashion spreads. Unless you’re Alex Wek and the photographer needs the color of the clothes to “pop” against your dark skin. If thin blackness is unwelcome, imagine a double-whammy of fat blackness. Since black women’s bodies tend to have an exaggeratedly feminine shape, it could be the tendency of fashion designers to pick androgynous shapes to model their clothes. Plus size white models don’t usually have a very exaggerated sexualized shape. So this goes back to society’s issues with black women’s bodies in general. Since black women are stereotyped so often as being loose or hypersexual, any emphasis placed on sexualized body parts due to their size compounds the problem. Better to leave that can of worms alone and just work with the non-black models.

Until the straight size world fully accepts their black models, plus size black models are unlikely to achieve any more success than their thin sisters. Unfortunately neither of these things seem likely to happen soon. We as plus size women are expected to be happy with what we’re given, sighing “At least we’re making some progress.” Yet in the fashion world progress is so often followed by regress. We as fashion consumers and drivers of commerce need to continue to work to represent our diversity in the hopes that mainstream fashion will take notice, and that this won’t just be another trend. Hopefully the increasing popularity of blogs such as Young Fat and Fabulous, Musings of a Fatshionista, and on the Latina spectrum, Fatshionable will send a message to the plus size fashion establishment that we want representation of all plus size women, not just the white models we see all too often in plus size spreads. Tokenism is not acceptable. Throwing one model of color in there to satisfy all people of color is unacceptable. Real diversity needs to occur before the typical plus size fashion model truly reflects those who drive the industry’s commerce. Retailers need to recognize the power these plus size blogging titans wield. Just by posting an outfit they threw on, these bloggers can inspire hundreds of fat women to go out and buy the exact same outfit.

This is an ongoing problem mirrored by the lack of meaningful inclusion of straight size black models, and like that problem, it will only be solved if we continually critique the fashion establishment and in the case of fat fashion, unpack the privilege that white plus size models (and white plus size women) enjoy at this point. Until the facts of the situation are laid bare, no work can be done to change it. With this, I’m attempting to lay down a foundation and start a dialog.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Where My Sistas At? The Underrepresentation of Black Plus Size … | Babesjunction.com | Beauty Tips | Makeup Tutorials | Beauty Products | Fashion Trends. on 23 Apr 2010 at 5:55 pm

    [...] more here: Where My Sistas At? The Underrepresentation of Black Plus Size … Twitter This [...]

Comments

  1. Medusa wrote:

    Since black women’s bodies tend to have an exaggeratedly feminine shape

    Um. What?

    Besides that I see your point with this article. Unfortunately, as you state, the straight size fashion industry has no interest in embracing black models, so the future looks bleak for the plus-sized industry doing the same.

    Also, I don’t fully understand where white people got the idea that “fat” is more acceptable in the black community. A defined waist with hips and boobs are what is desired and

    a) that has nothing to do with one’s fat composition and
    b) Isn’t that desired in the white community as well? Isn’t that why people like Jessica Biel and Scarlett Johannsen are considered hot? Or is just hot on white women, but if black women look like that they suddenly become fat?

  2. Mickey wrote:

    I agree with Medusa. The hourglass shape is considered a beautiful, feminine body type and many actresses of color possess the same shape like Scarlett Johanssen and are considered hot like Halle Berry and Salma Hayek.

    It seems to me that thin-with-curves-in-all-the-right-places is considered one of the most desireable body types in many races and cultures.

    Also, another name to add to that list of fat black women mocked by black men in drag with their sexuality is portrayed as a joke would be Keenan Thompson’s Virginica from SNL.

  3. Glen wrote:

    “one of the first and most popular fat fashion blogs, Young Fat & Fabulous, is run by a black woman.”

    While I agree with your overall point I disagree that YFF was one of the first to blog about fat fashion. Full Figure Plus launched in 2004 and was among the first to concentrate on plus size fashion. Their are others as well, my point is that blogging about fat fashion is not new it is just popular now.

    As to the issue of black plus models. They are out their in force but not being hired by mainstream therefore they must make their own way being used by bloggers such as myself or get involved in events like Full Figured Fashion Week(tm) As usual the mainstream will be a day and a dollar short to the value of the black plus model.

  4. TAB wrote:

    @Medusa,

    Yeah, the same line you quoted also gave me pause. As a black woman with basically no hips or butt, from a family of similar/same, my people have clearly failed to conform to type, lol.

    I think the whites’ misunderstanding comes from what mainstream (white) mass media describe as the ideal body size and shape (many models, actresses = size 0/2, small breasts, narrow hips, almost-flat butt) versus what the black media embrace (definitely bigger than 0/2 with hips, thighs, butt). So by white MM standards, where emaciated = normalized (aspirational?) standard, the black ideal = fat.

    I’ve heard and read descriptions of Scarlett Johannsen as fat (yes) or “voluptuous” and same with Beyonce. They’re both quite a bit smaller than the average American woman’s body, irrespective of ethnicity.

    @Tasha Fierce.

    Great article. It is ironic the fashion industry ignores us when we dedicate so many dollars to supporting it. It reaffirms my determination only to support those in it who support us. I don’t shop very often.

  5. Just A Thought wrote:

    I get what you are saying, but all black women’s bodies are not the same, nor do we ALL have an exaggerated feminine shape. I have relatives who would be considered plus size, and only two of them have the “hourglass on steroids” body shaped. Most are either apple shaped or boxy. Even with average or thin black women, our shapes vary. In pushing for progress for the plus sized fashion (and regular fashion) world, let’s not make gross generalizations or stereotypes that reinforce the very things we are fighting against.

  6. Just A Thought wrote:

    Since black women’s bodies tend to have an exaggeratedly feminine shape

    Let’s not make the same generalizations about black women and their bodies as the mainstream. At whatever spot on the weight spectrum you want to pick, there are women with various different body types and shapes. I can point to family members who are black and plus sized and WITHOUT an exaggerated feminine shape. Claiming the exaggerated hourglass as the domain of black women is buying into the oversexualization of black women’s bodies that you are working against.

  7. Essence wrote:

    This reminds me of how white, able-bodied, cis, gay men are the ones who usually represent the lgbtqi spectrum; there always seems to be the “most respectable” member to roll out as an ambassador, but that obviously makes use of the privilege these individuals have in other areas.

    Other black beauty practices are marginalized, while having a counterpart meant for the white majority– I’m specifically thinking of the careful delineation between weave and extensions. There is a tendency to keep things separated according to race, or to view the same things differently when they are entwined with race.

    These photographers have made it clear that they want to frame plus-size inclusion as a reworking of the “classical” body (which “happens to be” white), in an effort to conflate that privilege with the plus-sized. The idea of the classic body is made separate from WoC.

    I want to add a thank you, for mentioning the fact that fat is not necessarily accepted in the black community. I frequent Black Hair Media Forum, wherein there are sections devoted to women obsessively striving toward a perfect hourglass figure. It’s anything but fat acceptance.

  8. Ridiculous wrote:

    Yeah, I’m with Medusa, Just a Thought, and Tab. The women in my family have differing shapes. One side is has many super small and petite women, the other side is many busty and hippy, but there are several of us that fall in differing shapes and sizes than that. I’ve been told on multiple occasions that I have a “mainstream” 50’s figure. We DON’T come in a one-size fits all package.

    And… I’m actually happy that the plus-size run does NOT have mainly black faces attached to it. We need to be represented as part of an “ideal” beauty normative as well. I’m tired of always being represented as overweight, or a hood chick. This is not to diminish the importance of plus-size black women seeing their image in a positive light (b/c often times plus-size black women are depicted as manly or asexual), but we need to NOT be the face of every beauty campaign that goes “against” the mainstream. Let this be someone else’s fight, and ride the coattails for once instead of leading the charge.

  9. Ridiculous wrote:

    The previous comment had to do with this “typing” of black women’s bodies. Not all of us are born w/ “booty”. My family “tends” to divide along some lines. The women on one side “tend” to be small and petitite, the women on the other side “tend” to be more busty and hippy. But there are variations. I have “ruler-straight” relatives. I fall in the “classic” 50’s figure. By trending out our various body types, that actually allows other races of women with “our” body types to profit more off of their supposed exoticness (i.e. Kim Kardashian). They get to be built like “us” only without the blackness (the degenerating feature of us). If “us”, if “we” are allowed more breathing room in how we can exist, that would allow more of us to benefit from “their” standards as well.

    I see more representations of black plus-size women in the mainstream media than thinner black women when it comes to speaking parts on T.V., commercials, and movies. Even some of the “claiming to be clueless on racial issues” commenters on a well-known site have commented on that. While those representations need to be expanded to include those women as “prizes to be won”, I am not comfortable with the fact that I’m hearing more and more internet buzz for black women to be seen as plus-size in general. Not all of us are, nor (if we encompass the wide range of shapes that we are) should we be expected to be.

  10. Umm....wut wrote:

    I too take issue with the notion of an “exaggerated female shape”. “Exaggerated” makes a value judgement about what is normal and what is not. In my mind, an exaggerated female form would involve art or plastic surgery.

  11. Tasha Fierce wrote:

    Hi, thanks for reading my article.

    About the “exaggerated” shape comment, I did not mean to imply that all black women have that so-called “typical” female shape, which according to popular myth, is either pear-shaped or hourglass-shaped — I actually happen to be apple-shaped. That’s why I said “tend” to. Many of my family members are straight up and down; I know there’s variation. Maybe “exaggerated” wasn’t the best word to choose in referring to a body; I was trying to illustrate a point. I apologize if I offended anyone.

  12. Tasha Fierce wrote:

    Also, Glen, thank you for pointing out that your site has been around longer. I did not know that. I haven’t been blogging about fashion issues for very long; my previous blogs/journals have focused on more political issues.

    “I see more representations of black plus-size women in the mainstream media than thinner black women when it comes to speaking parts on T.V., commercials, and movies.”

    I was specifically speaking about mainstream fashion media rather than the general media. I agree that in the general media there’s more representation of fat black women, however they are often relegated to be the sassy best friend, or the loud snarky officemate, etc. Not always, but a lot of the time.

  13. Aprylle wrote:

    This is a wonderful article and as a plus size white woman, I have to say that anytime I see a plus size model in any sort of mainstream media, I’m happy. I wish that all women were properly represented whether they are short or tall, black or white, barely plus size or solidly plump.

    The fashion industry as a whole needs to restructure what it portrays as beautiful. I don’t know anybody that thinks the straight size fashion models bodies are beautiful. Designers may think their clothes look better on women the size of coat racks, but they may as well just be hanging shit on hangers and walking it down the runway. Real sized women wear clothing better, showing off the natural curvature of their bodies .

    No disrespect intended to women who are naturally thin. I refer specifically to the 6 foot tall women who starve themselves to be a size 0 or 2 simply to walk the runway. It’s a sad fact that being a size 6 or 8 in the fashion industry is considered to be close to plus size.

  14. Creole Tomato wrote:

    “Since black women are stereotyped so often as being loose or hypersexual, any emphasis placed on sexualized body parts due to their size compounds the problem.”

    Why is a hypersexual picture used to go along with this artcile?

    Mod Note – This image is from Vogue Italia’s Black Issue, featuring plus sized model Toccara. -LDP

  15. alison wrote:

    An hourglass figure is not exactly prized in white America either. The body type most prized is the desexualized, very thin one, as exemplified by Jackie Kennedy and Audrey Hepburn–the high class archetype one starves one’s self to achieve because it shows one is refined, self-sacrificing, demure, chaste. If you are unlucky enough to have breasts and hips and can’t starve yourself down to nothing, you can be the highly sexualized Marilyn Monroe type–men will want to sleep with you, but they will think you are stupid and won’t respect you.

  16. Bagelsan wrote:

    but we need to NOT be the face of every beauty campaign that goes “against” the mainstream.

    Lol. SO many ads where the company’s basically like “what? It’s all pretty skinny white blondish women? Throw in a fat black woman with natural hair and brightly colored clothes who’s, like, totally loving herself* despite being a fuckin’ weirdo!” and then they present it to the public like “here, we diverse-d it for you! Black women = so useful for representing nonconformity!” And then it becomes so ingrained in the cultural consciousness that something like having hair or being fat while black automatically makes you radical and counterculture.

    I would want a bit of a break from that, too.

    *she will, naturally, be sassy too.

  17. ladymorgue wrote:

    @alison
    I argue for the contrary since when Audrey Hepburn and Jackie Kenny were at their height of fame ( early- mid 60s) mod was in fashion the Mary Quant ,twiggy was in. Marilyn Monroe was out. I’m a massive Audrey Hepburn fan and when she came out 1950s she was different from the beauty standard, the hourglass which was at the time the desired body. Beauty standard is what is rare. Back in my grandmother’s day Jane Russel and Elizabeth Taylor. My generation it is the thin. If I was born in my grandmother’s area I would be pressured get a boob job and be taller. now I feel pressure to be thin and have lean legs. There is not such thing as a positive beauty standard. It harms us all.

  18. bdsista wrote:

    I think the photo is hot and not at all hypersexualized and I love the expression of the guy in the back! As an Image Consultant, this has been the bane of this industry for years. Trying to serve the needs of full figured women in an industry that classifies size 10-12 as plus sized in a world where plus really is 16-36. Although I don’t think the article was as well worded the point is well taken. I have been reading fashion mags (count 6-8 monthly) since high school and even then the only women that looked like me in high school were in Playboy. (in the 70s’). Most women are size 14 and up, yet the industry does not accomodate these women as consumers. Designers do not design clothes that fit the vast majority of American women. This is basically double discrimination, sizism and racism.

  19. Ridiculous wrote:

    @ bdsista – Wait, what? I’m confused as to how that is NOT a sexualized photo. The woman has on no pants, and is in a bra popping out the chis-chis while straddling a bike. And yes, I’m aware of the source of the photo, I own that very issue.

  20. cnedaw wrote:

    A lot of people took issue with the ascribing of a certain body type to most black women. I don’t think this is something that is merely found in fashion or media imagery.

    I have heard medical professionals actually infer that black women are just bigger than white women or women of other races, in much the way it is assumed a typical Asian person is shorter and smaller framed than people of other races. Is that due to them being influenced by stereotypes of their own, patients, or is there actual some genetic basis for this belief?

    I do know its a fact that generally black girls tend to hit puberty earlier than white girls which is when weight distribution changes in the body are most evident.

    I am a tall thin and flat butted black woman with a decent sized chest, though.

    When I went to a majority white school I was still bigger than most of the white girls, despite being very thin. I experienced the same thing when I did mainstream pageants.
    And I have a small or average sized frame.

    But when I attended black schools or was in black pageants I was definitely smaller than most of the other black girls my age.

    Anecdotal I know, but I would love it if anyone could shed any light on this. Yes every body is individually different but is there really any truth to there being that much of a variance in normal healthy size of black women and women of other races??

    While I do believe there is some stereotyping at play, there does seem to be a strong belief, that generally speaking black women’s bodies are shaped differently than other races of women.

    Remember all the people applauding Michelle Obama’s figure as being representational of black women? She is taller, broader, and hippier than most women I know, but she was presented as being typical of black women.

  21. April wrote:

    @Ridiculous:

    There’s a difference between sexualized and hypersexualized. I guess you could argue for either one (I’d say sexualized but not hypersexualized); that determination is in the eye of the beholder. I totally agree with your first comment, though:

    I’m tired of always being represented as overweight, or a hood chick. This is not to diminish the importance of plus-size black women seeing their image in a positive light (b/c often times plus-size black women are depicted as manly or asexual), but we need to NOT be the face of every beauty campaign that goes “against” the mainstream.

    @Tasha Fierce:
    I’m still not feeling the line that “black women’s bodies tend to have an exaggeratedly feminine shape.” (Also, what is a “feminine” shape? I take it that you’re referring to an hourglass figure, but I think the equation of “feminine” with “hourglass” deserves some more consideration.) Though I appreciate your attempt to explain, unless you have some proof that black women’s bodies don’t follow the average apple/pear/straight/hourglass distribution, I think this statement is wildly off base. Other than that, great post.

  22. ashley wrote:

    You may never read this, Bagelsan. But your comment is classic (and the funniest thing I’ve read in a very long time)!