“How to Make It in America:” Betting on the Decline of New York

By Guest Contributor Aymar Jean Christian, originally published at Televisual

Dude comedies have become a staple of the American media diet, though they probably always have been in some form or another. Slacker dudes are particularly popular—the successes of Judd Apatow and Seth MacFarlane’s most popular fare are evidence enough.

HBO, in its perpetual effort to not be television, has taken this formula and turned it on its head. First with Entourage, a series about making it and staying on top, and now with How to Make It in America, about what happens before you’ve made it. Our two heroes, Ben (Bryan Greenberg) and Cam (Victor Rasuk) are too guys who are tired of doing nothing, and propose to start a line of designer jeans.

I suspect Ben and Cam will eventually get rich. The series can’t sustain itself on poverty and hardship (it’s too earnest); still, there’s something intriguing about How to Make It in America’s emphasis on the less glamorous, or occasionally glamorous New York—as opposed to Sex and the City and its copycats’ perpetually glamorous city, or Entourage’s Los Angeles. Sure, there are hot girls and gallery openings, even a cameo from John Varvatos, but the tone of the show is a little dour, like New York after The Fall. It’s certainly about the increasingly distant American dream and the ridiculous lengths people go through to achieve it. Yet it’s also, I suspect, about how the dream is almost just a handshake and a cocktail away.

More than anything, How to Make It is about the dream of post-boom New York City (perhaps also post-Boom America, but it’s really NYC-focused). This became very clear in episode two when Ben describes the philosophy behind his denim line to his former fashion professor. He wants to get back to the grit and authenticity of old NYC. “It’s inspired by 1970s New York, so you’ve got the birth of hip hop and the birth of punk rock … just the spirit of the 70s,” Ben says. “Were you even alive in the 70s? This place was a dump. Central Park was a war zone. Times Square was full of hookers,” the prof retorts. Ben: “What’s not to love, right?”

The “real” New York runs through How to Make It, especially in its use of still photographs over various parts of the city, both in its intro and between scenes. Unfortunately, these photos give the show almost all its verve—so far, it’s otherwise uninteresting. The photographs give us a sense of place, a grittier, dirtier, darker New York City, like in Scorsese’s Taxi Driver or After Hours.

How to Make It in America seems to be saying: it’s great to be rich and successful in New York, so long as everyone else is suffering. It’s a bit strange, really. The New York of the 60s, 70s and early 80s, is fantasized and longed for, with its “realness,” cheap real estate, empty storefronts and dirty streets. In this fantasy, a poorer New York is a playground. Gone from the discussion are rampant crime and unemployment. This New York is a great place to live, if you’re one of the few people to have “made” it. You can buy an enormous apartment; bolt downtown and take in some underground art, stopping by Warhol’s Factory, Oldenberg’s Store, Haring’s Shop; see Madonna sing; and jet back to your loft before you get robbed.

But the truth is, if this magical New York reappears, it’ll probably be at the expense of our heroes Ben and Cam. Independent luxury brands do not fare well in tough times, ceding ground to more established labels. Recently, Phi and Maria Pinto, a Michelle Obama favorite, have both shuttered. Zac Posen apparently isn’t doing too well. Even celebrity fashion lines have suffered. There are always successes, of course, but I doubt any investor would give much money to our former slacker dudes in this economy.

The appeal of the old New York, especially to many unemployed men who now populate the rolls, is understandable. Who wouldn’t want to see their smug high school colleague turned hedge fund manager down and out and living in New Jersey? But the truth is, if he’s forced out of Manhattan, you’re living on Staten Island with mom and dad, and there isn’t anything less glamorous than that.

How To Make It in America is off to a rough start, lacking the tight plotting of HBO’s dramas or sharp dialogue of Entourage and Sex and the City. I suspect the show will improve as Ben and Cam succeed, even if their success is utterly—and disappointingly—a fantasy.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. “How to Make It in America:” Betting on the Decline of New York « Televisual on 09 Mar 2010 at 1:07 pm

    [...] New York from the opening credits. Originally published at Splice Today; Thanks to Racialicious for reposting [...]

Comments

  1. lynn wrote:

    NYC was awesome in the 70s and early 80s. I grew up there. Sure Central Park was dirtier, but that didn’t stop me and my friends from sledding/skateboarding/hanging out there after school every day (depending on the season). Times Square was tawdry and had element of danger to it, but that’s what made it such an exciting place to walk around. We would walk down to the Village and ogle the sex shops (never daring to go in of course). It had so much to offer, and unlike today, you could partake of many of its delights on a kid’s allowance. Movies were $3.00 to get in, for instance.

  2. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    I was born in1968 – the old New York of the 1970’s is where I grew up (Chelsea in Manhattan from birth to age 3, Far Rockaway, Queens from 3 to 17 – West Harlem from then til now)

    Plus, I’ve written extensively about the history of New York City in that era

    And, quite frankly, the old New York was a much better city to live in – ESPECIALLY for People of Color and working class people of any race.

    I’m not going to romanticize things – but decent paying unionized blue collar jobs were much more plentiful than they are now, rents were lower, gentrification had yet to cut the giant swath of urban relocation and peaceful ethnic cleansing that it would later inflict on the city and not nearly as many young Black and Latino men were funneled off into the penal colonies of Upstate New York.

    On the whole, the NYC of the Lindsay/Beame era was a much better city to live in than the NYC of the Koch/Dinkins/Giuliani/Bloomberg era – at least for MOST New Yorkers.

    And that also was the era of New York’s greatest cultural contributions to the world – Martin Scorsese, Keith Haring, Michel Basquiat – and, of course, the great cultural tsunami called hip hop, that basically changed the world.

    Admittedly, if you’re a rich person (and, in particular, if you’re a rich WHITE person) the Koch/Dinkins/Giuliani/Bloomberg era is much better.

    But, if I could, I’d make this city like it was in the 1970’s – NYC was a much better place for, to quote KRS-ONE “the Average New Yorker”

  3. Eva wrote:

    @lynn:

    I think it’s all about perspective. I was a teenager in the 70’s in NYC and I never walked across 42nd street unless I had to. I remember the first time I’d walked there in years, it was in 1999 and the AMC movie theater was there, I could not believe I was on 42nd Street, it was so beautiful to me, much cleaner.

    I didn’t like NYC when the subways and Central Park were dangerous and dirty, but you are correct that at that time you could do more as a teenager, like go to the movies. $3 was how much it cost downtown, uptown you could see a double feature (after the Academy Awards) for $2.50.

  4. miss a. wrote:

    I’ve never lived in New York or seen an NYC pre-Guiliani, but I can see where the glorification of “old” New York would appeal to so many.

    I’m enjoying the show so far, as I feel the plight of Ben and Cam is so relateable regardless of where you’re living. It’s tough being a post-grad, attempting to grasp at a dream that seems so interminably far. One particular line ingrained itself in my mind – after Ben finds out that Cam received a loan from his just-out-of-prison cousin, Cam says to him, “I was just tired of seeing all our friends make it. I just wanted us to do something for once.”

  5. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    Miss A # 4

    “It’s tough being a post-grad, attempting to grasp at a dream that seems so interminably far.”

    It’s even tougher being somebody with a high school diploma who’s just trying to put a roof over your head, clothes on your back and food on the table!

    It was a whole lot easier to do that in the old NYC, the one that had 900,000 unionized factory jobs, where you could get decent pay for unskilled labor – and the NYC that had Rent Control so your landlord was limited to charging you a fair affordable rent (not the gouging of today where many New Yorkers pay half their income in rent!)

  6. Erika wrote:

    It’s pretty hilarious to me that people actually dream of becoming Carrie Bradshaw or her male equivalent, and I also secretly hope that many people fail because I don’t want them to drive up rents even higher. Before unemployment I had dreams of living with my boyfriend in Queens, and that even seems impossible now. Who woulda thunk.

  7. Cassie wrote:

    @ Erika:

    Are you familiar with Julia Allison? She’s essentially a real-life Carrie Bradshaw.

  8. PurpleMartianMan wrote:

    This new nyc is a wasteland. seriously. best description for it would be soulless. I’ve never seen such a glut of inert, useless mothafluckas in my life. Totally. Brooklyn has been decimated without one bomb going off.

    Lived here all my life. Yea, we’ve made dumbass, clueless tourists safer in their quest for the best fried dough, but at what expense has this illusion of safety cost the city?

    New York City is dead. LONG LIVE NEW YORK CITY

  9. [dave] wrote:

    Sorry to hear the show get a blah review. My friend Iyeoka (iyeoka.com for the curious … slam/soul/funk) got her first commercial song placement on the show, so I was sort of jazzed to watch it. Although I had no idea it was on youtube, so at least I’ll have the chance to confirm the blahness.

  10. AJ wrote:

    Interesting. You know, the older I get, the less I put stock in narratives of progress OR decline. The truth is, new circumstances bring positives and negatives. I’m actually inclined to believe New York was better pre-gentrification/corporatization/Giulianization. I’ve made the argument many times myself. But I do think it’s important to not forget the bad stuff too, which I think we’re in danger of doing in the super-expensive city New York is now.

    I’m all about trying to find a happy medium, even though our under-regulated capitalism has a bad track record of producing happy mediums.