Why I Still Watch Lost

By Guest Contributor Bao Phi, originally published at the Star Tribune’s Your Voices Blog

(Thanks to Katie Leo, Darren Lee, Jasmine Tang, Charlotte Karem Albrecht, and Phil Yu, who proof-read and offered edits, thoughts and arguments for this entry, and a big shout out to Tatiana, Thuyet, Sajin, Lisa, Juliana, Jasmine, Darren, and the rest of our beloved people of color Lost Twin Cities viewing crew)

For much of my adult life, I didn’t watch television.  Except for the Simpsons and X-Files, I had not been a big fan of television since my early addictions to Robotech, Reading Rainbow, and Transformers.  I missed out on shows that a lot of my peers seemed to be into, like Cheers, Seinfeld, Friends, The Cosby Show and The Fresh Prince.   Mostly because I didn’t have time to dedicate myself to a weekly viewing schedule, and I hated the idea of missing an episode if I did happen to fall in love with a series.  Added to this my growing unease with the lack of, or problematic depictions of, Asian and Asian Americans in media, and television became a pop culture blind spot I was more than willing to have.

With the invention of the DVD and being able to rent series from the video store, I began to rent shows and see what I had been missing.  One show that was getting considerable buzz in the Asian American community was Lost.  Until I started hearing murmurs from my peers about the show, I had dismissed it as that show about being stranded on an island starring that hobbit from Lord of the Rings.  But some very impassioned community members kept arguing about how great the writing was, the fantastic premise, and above all, the nuanced characters played by Daniel Dae Kim and Yunjin Kim. Despite all the positive buzz, I couldn’t quite believe it.

Asian Americans have good reason to be skeptical, when it comes to representation in film and television.  You either get racially displaced (see this great post on Racialicious regading whites cast as Asian: and that’s just the tip of the iceberg)  or, if Asians are portrayed at all, it’s usually as a male martial arts villain/punching dummy for a Caucasian hero, or a female victim in need of love and being saved from her war-torn homeland/her oppressive patriarchal culture by a white knight.  Pun intended.  Even in shows like E.R., where you’d think since it was based in Chicago hospitals that there’d be lots of Asians, there were just a token one or two.  You know those online quizzes where you answer a series of questions and it tells you what character you’d be on a television show or movie?  I don’t take those quizzes, because usually “Asian delivery boy #2” is not one of the outcomes.

What’s especially perplexing is the failure of American media, mainstream and alternative, to mention issues of race and representation when it comes to Asians.  As a person who reads pop culture reviews from Roger Ebert to the Onion’s AV Club to local papers such as the Star Tribune or City Pages, seldom have I found any American reviewer or commentator, regardless of race or gender, mention issues of representation when it comes to Asians and Asian Americans. From movies like The Painted Veil where Asians are relegated to mere backdrop, to films like Rambo and The Last Samurai where a white hero is inserted to save/slaughter Asians, to pop culture blockbuster shows like Battlestar Gallactica with its loaded and problematic Asian female character, to films like 21 and Avatar: the Last Airbender, where Asians are outright replaced by whites, one cannot find many instances where reviewers and commentators think race regarding Asians and Asian Americans is worth mentioning or discussing.

To be honest, the first few episodes of Lost didn’t help the cause.  Here was a patriarchal, abusive and domineering Korean husband and his docile Korean wife, two characters seemingly tailor-made for that type of condescending, patronizing and self-congratulatory first-world liberation story that seems so popular in Hollywood.  There was also the problematic depiction of the Iraqi character Sayid, played by Naveen Andrews, and though he is a thoroughly amazing actor and his presence brings the number of primary Asian cast members in the show to an unprecedented three (!), there was that nagging feeling that maybe the role should have gone to an Iraqi or at least Arab actor, and the fact that the dude was a torturer didn’t exactly break any stereotypes.

But at the behest of my peers, I stuck with the series and dutifully plowed through season 1, DVD after DVD even though many of the early episodes honestly made me cringe, and still make me cringe: Jin slapping Sun’s hand, Sun strutting in a bathing suit as if it was the most liberating act in the world (considering how men and women dress in Seoul, which is where Jin and Sun are supposedly from, one wonders if a bathing suit is really a big deal).  And then there was the show’s embarrassing (though thankfully brief) depiction of the antagonism between Jin and one of the few Black male characters in the show, Michael (played by Harold Perrineau).  In an episode, the show hints at a chemistry between Sun and Michael, a sub-plot that would continue through several episodes.  In that same episode, Jin violently attacks Michael, and later Michael violently retaliates against Jin.  At one point Michael tells his son Walt that, where he comes from, Koreans do not like Black people.  Of course the Asians get no say in this matter.  These superficial and sensationalized depictions of race and gender conflict struck me as irresponsible and tired.  To tell you the truth, it all seemed quite dreadful, and I hurried through season one waiting for the drastic turnaround that my community members promised me would be there if I was just patient.

It was a long time later, in the penultimate episode of season 1, where at last the character arcs of Jin, Sun, and Sayid finally allowed them to be thoroughly complicated, and sympathetic characters.  But what a punishing ordeal the makers of Lost made us endure for, finally, an earned moment of beauty and a kiss between two Asian characters on prime time American television.  If at this point you would accuse me of being nauseatingly hetero, let me ask you to put this in context: in your viewing of American television and film, how often have you seen two Asian characters kiss?  Now compare that number to everyone else.  See?

Maybe that’s why since then I’ve become, and have remained, a loyal but critical Lost fan. Things have gotten better regarding representation.  Sayid has emerged as one of the most compelling characters in television, and is by far the most sympathetic Iraqi character in American pop culture.  Daniel Dae Kim and Yunjin Kim have garnered critical acclaim for bringing their nuanced and well-loved characters to life.  The addition of the great Ken Leung bumps the number of primary Asian cast members up to four.  Four!  For those of you who are laughing, imagine how rough it must be for Asian American viewers, let alone Asian American actors, if an American show with four Asian and Asian American major cast members is a lot.  It is, in fact, a ton.    Add to that number the supporting character Pierre Chang (played by Francois Chau) and you have one of the largest Asian casts in popular American television history.  One of my fellow Lost viewers reminded me of a wonderful scene in Season 5 with Jin, Miles, Pierre, and Hurley – perhaps one of the few scenes in pop American culture featuring four men of color that was at once well-written, funny, and effortless.

Lost is significant in that it proved that it was not only possible to conceive a show with a large, diverse, well-rounded cast of characters, but you could also make it intelligent and challenging – and people would watch it,” remarks Phil Yu, creator of the insightful pop culture website Angry Asian Man (angryasianman.com) and Lost fan.   “Yes, America will watch Asians on TV!  Both subtitled and English-speaking Asians alike.”

It is telling that, at a moment in time where we are told that race doesn’t matter anymore, Lost has a substantial following amongst Asian Americans.  Sure, it may not be the only reason many of us watch Lost, but it also cannot be denied that the large number of complex, sympathetic Asian characters on the show has something to do with our loyalty.

At the same time, there’s still plenty of room for improvement.  There is still a shortage of other characters of color in the show, and while I applaud the relatively large number of Asian actors, I’d be great if they were joined by actors from other communities of color.  The newer actors introduced in recent years, such as Michelle Rodriguez, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Said Taghmaoui, and the ill-fated Kiele Sanchez and Rodrigo Santoro, have for some reason or other have had bad “luck”, shall we say, with the show and its fans.

And aspects of the Asian characters as well as other characters of color sometime toe the line towards stereotype.  Season 3’s episode Stranger in A Strange Land, guest starring Bai Ling, manages to portray every ugly stereotype of a Southeast Asian country as seen through a white male tourist – and not in a way that was remotely critical or even interesting.

Some aspects of the character Sayid remain troubling.  “Sayid’s career as a torturer reinforces the idea that violence comes naturally to him, and thus much of his character is to redeem himself as a ‘good Arab’ – one that works for the good  of all people,” observes University of Minnesota grad student and Lost fan Charlotte Karem Albrecht.  “Clearly, the show tries to complicate this stereotype, but because Sayid’s violent past still keeps popping up in ways that signal he has to control violent impulses, it seems to be linked to the notion of an inherently violent culture or an inherently violent essence, which because he is Muslim and Arab are presented as one in the same.”

And it doesn’t escape me that bad-boy white heartthrob to middle America, Sawyer, reserves his racial quips for the Asians (sure, he makes fun of everybody, but he doesn’t make fun of everybody racially).

But my loyalty and hope for Lost, as well as greater change, can be compared to one of my favorite scenes in the entire series, the last episode of season 1.  By that episode, Losties had seen 24 hour-long episodes of back-story, drama, and lots and lots of characters with daddy issues.  There was a smoke monster that liked to munch on tourists, a mysterious band of enemies known enigmatically as the others, the deaths of several castaways, and a long and well-earned reunifying kiss (yay!).  But then, seemingly out of nowhere, there is a simple montage scene set to music, of all the characters getting onto the plane before it takes off and flies them their fate.  There’s Charlie trying to stuff his guitar into a closet, there’s Hurley with a Spanish-language comic book, there’s Sayid trying to stay cool as a white dude looks at him wordlessly and assumes he’s a terrorist.  This simple, effective scene seems to urge us to pause and examine a moment, getting onto a plane, that many of us take for granted, that could change our lives forever.  It’s a bittersweet moment illuminating that many of our lives are connected in ways we don’t even understand, that our lives can be connected in ways both beautiful and tragic.  So even if a blog about a show like Lost at this moment seems trivial, superficial, and unnecessary, it’s my hope that it has its own place in this mundane moment and may one day lead to something quite fantastic.

Or at least, a bunker full of Dharma ranch dip and some Apollo bars.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Saturday Link Roundup (2/6/10) :: The Last Airbender Movie Casting | Activism at Racebending.com on 06 Feb 2010 at 4:03 am

    [...] Why I Still Watch Lost – by Bao Phi of Racialicious As Lost enters its final season, Bao Phi – spokesperson for Nerds of Color everywhere – gives us the rundown on his complicated relationship with the show. A wonderful take on the show from an Asian American perspective – an honest look that examines Lost, warts and all. [...]

Comments

  1. Thom wrote:

    Truthfully, I always read the scene where Michael makes the comment about Koreans not liking black people where they come from as a negative on Michael…that he kind of saw himself as the guy the world was against at all times.

    The loss of Eko (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje) bugged me. I get the actor asked to be released due to personal issues going on at the time… and you really don’t have many options since everyone is trapped on the island. But still.

    Sun and Jin are two of my favorite characters and the episode towards the end of season 4 that was focused on them was absolutely heart breaking. I am a sucker for reconciliation of friends,lovers, etc… and I think few shows have made it so believable. You see the dynamic changing between them, you see real change-especially in Jin. It just worked.

    For all its problems, I do think Lost does give more compelling roles to people of color than a lot of television.

  2. pmsrhino wrote:

    Lately I’ve been impressed that it’s been 5 seasons and Lost has managed to not go the way Heroes did and kill off most of it’s minority cast members. And the writers have done a good job of making the main characters very complex. Not saying much for the stand alone episodes like Jack’s tattoo episode, where they don’t have 5 seasons to delve into the scenario so they just go with what they got, which tends to be problematic and full of stereotypes. But I’ve always felt Lost (at least past season 1) did a good job making everyone complex and not just a stereotype.

    And Jin and Sun have always been one of my favorite couples in the show (Rose and Bernard will forever be my all time favorite Lost couple. Omg I wish they were still around more often, I love them to death!) and I’m kinda sad that this is gonna be the last season, but I must say I am ready for some answers.

  3. Thom wrote:

    It’s hard not to love Rose and Bernard. The reveal of their story was touching beyond words to me. I could care less about Kate/Jack/Sawyer… Rose and Bernard and Sun and Jin are the couples I watch the show for.

  4. Mammith wrote:

    Looking at the promo images for Season 6, I did note that 7 of the 14 pictured main characters were POC, which is pretty awesome.

    The image if anyone’s interested: http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/storage/craveonline.com/upl_images/lost_last-supper1.jpg

    The show itself has had problems with it’s representations of certain characters of colour, which the article writer pointed out pretty well. but on the whole I think lost is better at being good then at being bad regarding it’s portrayals of characters of colour.

    I do remember a pretty funny scene from season 5 in where Jin asks Charlotte to translate Korean for him and Sawyer stupidly assumes he means Miles, to which he replies completely deadpan ‘I’m from Nevada’

  5. thebiblophile wrote:

    Could one way of reading the scene/episode where Michael tells Walt that where he comes from “Koreans don’t like Black people,” be read in another way – a chance the show took to bring forth interracial dynamics between two communities that have struggled or had a fraught relationship? In other words, could that problematic statement, been written to confront the suspicion certain viewers would have had that the beef between Michael and Jin was racial? And/or did it give us a moment to see that Michael, as the sole Black male was feeling isolated and threatened?

    In that moment, could it be that the show assumes that the subject position of the viewer is non-white and would more easily/readily “get” the reference? In other words, would a person who was white, necessarily even be able to decipher the heavy racial message and lament in Michael’s comment? And I sort of see the comment from Michale as a lament – he’s desperate and sad. And how many times have you watched Black folks and Asian folks interact, and wanted to say, to paraphrase Margaret Cho, “no, we should be joining together!”

    I agree with the post, that its unfortunate, because the comment is made – as it absolutely reinforces stereotypes, and Jin never gets to respond. But I wonder if in some ways Jin is able to respond. The response comes from the fact that despite fighting in the beginning of their relationship Jin and Michael actually build one of the strongest relationships/friendships on the island. That their initial (mis)understandings of each other are completely broken down – so Michael in fact has his assumptions disrupted – and we as a viewer are given the powerful image of two men of color from different ethnic groups (2 groups who have struggled and stereotyped), in fact working bravely together.

    Also, Lost is a show that is constantly shifting the subject positions of the viewer – I wonder if some of the presentations of problematic tropes are also tricks to pull viewers who might be otherwise reluctant to stay with shows that feature casts largely of color. But because Lost constantly shifts the position of the viewer and speaks to the viewer on so many different levels, and through multiple characters, it’s able to surface the stereotype and then through back story, evolution of plot and characters, address and in some cases dismantle the stereotypes and preconceptions of the viewer.

    Perhaps that’s giving the show too much credit? Being too Pollyanna-ish…? But the way the show draws in viewers, some of the camera shots they use to engage viewers and show perspective (ever notice how as viewers we’re often watching people, watch other people on a screen) not only complicate plot, but also the relationship of the viewer to the identities (racial, ethnic, gender, ability) of the characters.

    And what about the discourse re: ability and race vis-a-vis John Locke……

    SO EXCITED TO SEE THE PREMIERE…okay I can calm down now…sorry….shuffling over to a corner now, slightly embarassed….

  6. 7thangel wrote:

    good article

    now, let’s be honest. there’s still a quota. if they added more black or latin@ characters and didn’t kill them off, then a sacrifice of at least one of the asian characters would have taken place. were all pretty much interchangeable as we assist in helping white folks survive and live to find happiness and love.

    offtopic (sort of): did you know there’s a user made version of matrix without the zion scenes? one of the reasons i’ve heard from some who like this version is that zion was ‘too pc’ and other racefail stuff you come to expect from those so used to always being the focus, even in the background.

  7. Klonoa wrote:

    Miles, a legitimate Asian-AMERICAN character, is awesome.

    I do feel that Sun, Jin, Sayid, and Hurley were always sort of secondary characters and not exactly MAIN characters in the way that Jack, Kate, Sawyer, Ben, Locke were, and often seemed to be relegated to the B-plot. They certainly got less screen time.

    The strange phenomenon of non-Asian actors of color “not working out” is unfortunate and an interesting observation. That *other* serialized show with the large ensemble cast and sci-fi elements also lost literally all of its non-Asian PoCs but added a literal carnival-full of white characters in its (unintentionally) final season. The three (!!!) Asian actors have all survived, against all odds, through the fourth season, although two had their screen times drastically reduced.

    With that said, this article rubs me the wrong way in their singling out of the third actor:
    http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/telefile/2010/02/10-actors-who-should-make-like.php
    As if he’s the only annoying character that show has ever produced?

  8. Patrick wrote:

    the biblophile- I really like your reading of Michael and Jin’s interactions, and, Pollyanna-ish or not, I really think that that friendship was a great credit to the show.

    I also think that the different readings of that scene between Michael and Jin speak to the problem of scale when it comes to looking at television. Looking at the whole of Michael and Jin’s relationship, I think you’d be hard pressed to criticize its depiction. Certainly, the image of Jin and Michael’s raft leaving the beach was powerful; all the hopes and dreams of rescue for the whole plane were placed, quite optimistically onto their efforts. But looking episodically, Bao’s reading is perfectly sound. I still like the scene, because my reading is similar to thebiblophile’s, but both arguments are pretty strong, I think. On what scale do we hold the writers responsible to? I think we end up with stronger work, if we look at the whole season- I think of looking at one episode as only reading one chapter in a novel. But then again, tv isn’t viewed like a novel. The episodes often are watched on their own, and the time it takes between them, usually only a week but sometimes longer, means that the episodes have a power, a contribution to discourse of their own, separate from the whole season. So do we hold writers accountable for an episodic responsibility, or do we allow for the greater season long developments?

    I think that the list of the non-asian dead is quite unfortunate, but I think its interesting how much it correlates with the moment the writers were able to set an end date and the sharp upturn in quality that ensued. Michelle Rodriguez, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Kiele Sanchez and Rodrigo Santoro all were introduced and killed off during the period when the show was spinning its wheels and had no clear future to its story. After that, yes, Said Taghmaoui’s tenure was short-lived, but then so were Rebecca Mader’s and Jeremy Davies’, and in that time we were introduced to Miles, and Nestor Carbonell’s Richard came to prominence, and Zuleikha Robinson’s Ilana was added to the cast. I think Lost is a good depiction of the way a good depiction of race is really based in good writing in general.

  9. Robin wrote:

    I don’t know if anyone saw the premier last night, but I’m really curious to hear peoples’ thoughts on the newest addition to the cast – the character who seems to be the temple leader. He has long hair and dresses in robes and speaks only Japanese (?) with an English translator. The depiction of this new character made me uncomfortable as it seemed to play off of some kind of mystical Asian guru type stereotypes.

  10. thebiblophile wrote:

    Ditto Robin…there was a lot of eyebrow raising for me after last night’s premiere. I had a “d’oh” moment for sure.

  11. Thom wrote:

    I didn’t read him as mystical, really. Secretive, yes…but he is trying to protect the Others, who have been hiding out at the temple. The situation was full of mystery, but it would have been so had he been hispanic, black, white, etc.

  12. distance88 wrote:

    The show is not without its flaws. There have been so many times with Lost where I’m just about to start shaking my fist at the tv–Nigerian drug lord, Iraqi soldier/torturer, feisty Latina cop, overweight guy, etc–but then Lost goes where other shows don’t and actually develops the character of these individuals, so they end becoming much deeper than the one-dimensional stereotypes that are initially conveyed.

    Maybe someone can correct me, but I can’t think of another primetime American tv series that has featured so much non-English (spoken) dialog.

  13. Robin wrote:

    “I can’t think of another primetime American tv series that has featured so much non-English (spoken) dialog.” Yeah, this got me thinking. I thought their treatment of the new Asian character last night was interesting in part for this reason. Whereas when Sun and Jin speak Korean and it often has subtitles, this character was given a translator. I feel like it had the affect of other-ing the character, although you could argue the opposite, that is actually subversive because it challenges the primacy of the English language on the show. Still, having to relate to the character through his English speaking mouth piece definitely puts distance between him and the audience, and I think arguably makes him less relatable over all. That and we still no next to nothing about him. :)

  14. RCHOUDH wrote:

    Thanks Bao for this great article detailing the show Lost. I’ve never really watched this series so I liked your input on it. And I also liked what you mentioned about being a “loyal but critical viewer”. I think that’s a very important concept because while it allows you to still enjoy a show or movie, that doesn’t mean you can’t look for ways that the story could improve its characters or storyline.

  15. Hapa wrote:

    “And it doesn’t escape me that bad-boy white heartthrob to middle America, Sawyer, reserves his racial quips for the Asians (sure, he makes fun of everybody, but he doesn’t make fun of everybody racially).”

    I actually wonder how Josh Holloway feels about depicting a character that reduces people to race since he’s married to an asian woman.

    “Rose and Bernard and Sun and Jin are the couples I watch the show for.”

    My bf and I love those two couples. We pretty much watch Lost for them alone as well. I’m really happy to see an asian couple, and a black woman in a healthy relationship where race never seems to be mentioned. Rose and Bernard just are, and it’s beautiful.

  16. vortexgods wrote:

    One important thing about Michael saying “Blacks and Koreans don’t like each other” as an excuse for Jin not liking him: It was simply a lie.

    He knew that Jin had real reasons for disliking him, probably because he stole Jin’s very expensive watch. Or possibly because he was obviously attracted to Jin’s wife an Jin was a jealous man. He came up with an excuse so as not to look bad to other people.

    I did think that their (Jin and Sun’s) relationship was a bit silly, but I think we were just supposed to get that Jin was very jealous (with good reason it turned out later, Sun had taken a lover back in Korea.).

    While it’s true there are a lot of gangster characters on Lost… most of the main cast are either some sorts of criminal or involved with the criminal underworld. Locke, Sawyer, Jin, Sun, Mr. Eko, Kate, I could go on…

    I get the feeling that they had a problem keeping Eko, he was a popular character but the actor had other commitments… I actually hope he shows up in alterna-LA.

  17. ourname wrote:

    Lost had me at Hurley. A cute, sweet, totally believable, chubby guy who doesn’t play into any typical Latino stereotypes? I can’t even think of another Latino character on television EVER that I like (or can relate to) as much as Hugo Reyes.

  18. G.K. wrote:

    @vortexgods

    Michael didn’t steal the watch—he found it on the beach–he had no way of even knowing it was Jin’s watch, until Jin jumped on him, which I thought was entirely unecessary and counterproductive. And it was Sun who came to him to tell him her secret–that she could actually speak English—he didn’t go to her–I always thought it was an apology on her part for her husband beating him up.