Race, Gender, Art, and Yoko Ono

by Latoya Peterson

Bitch Magazine published an interesting piece called “Oh Yoko!: 20 Ways of Looking at an Art-World Icon.” There are 20 different takes on Yoko Ono’s body of work and perception in the media, many of which revolve around art and gender. Others dealt with race, self-perception, and darkness. Here are my favorites:

4. Offered Sacrifice
Back in the ’60s, I was peripherally involved in a Fluxus concert evening at the Carnegie Recital Hall in New York where Yoko did several pieces, [including] “Cut Piece.” People began lining up to cut little pieces of her skirt or sleeves or strands of hair as souvenirs, or artworks, if you prefer. Everybody was very respectful, [and] Yoko remained impassive, without any change of expression.

The atmosphere changed to dark and unpleasant when several young men who were obviously not members of the art community started taking off large parts of her skirt and sweater, disclosing her bra, and getting back on line after each of their cuts. They couldn’t stop laughing. I recall Carolee Schneemann going up to one of them and slapping him in the face, which didn’t faze him one bit. He was after Yoko—the offered sacrifice.

At the point where one of the grinning guys went towards her bra strap with the scissors, Yoko made a slight gesture towards the wings, and the curtain immediately closed on her before her breast could be revealed. The piece was over. Obviously, when you let the audience into the artwork, you can’t always predict the result.
—eleanor antin, performance artist, filmmaker, and installation artist

7. Self-Aware
Yoko often mentioned in interviews that she felt that an Asian woman was seen as a dragon lady or an obedient slave—nothing in between the extremes. There were countless racist remarks in the press, especially after the breakup of the Beatles, but she has overcome it over many years. She has made a great contribution in changing the world’s view of Asian women in general. She has consistently projected an image of a self-aware, confident, creative, and strong-willed woman.
—midori yoshimoto, associate professor of art history, New Jersey City University, and author of Into Performance: Japanese Women Artists in New York

15. Brilliant/Alone
Yoko has suffered more than most people understand. Her father was often absent; she was 12 when she fled to the mountains of Japan with part of her family, escaping the bombings in Tokyo but learning about Hiroshima and Nagasaki; she attended college in the United States in the 1950s when the Japanese were vilified; her passionate art was ridiculed as too “expressionistic”; her daughter was kidnapped by her second husband; she was ostracized by the public as the “dragon lady” for putatively breaking up the Beatles; she struggled with Lennon on drugs; she and Lennon were threatened by the CIA with his deportation; she witnessed his murder, and so on.

The result: Yoko feels alone and sometimes trusts others to “handle” her and her art for better or worse. Nonetheless, Yoko inspires me. She is a brilliant, poetic, tough role model who is forthright with herself and brings that honesty to
her art.
—kristine stiles, professor of art and art history, Duke University

20. Me
Yoko in hot pants, at antiwar rallies: classic proof of her bona fide iconoclast ways, mixing sex(iness) and politics—no hippie-feminist-activist Earth shoes, please!

Before I got her brilliance, I used to resent her, even though it wasn’t her fault that I got called “Yoko” in the late ’60s. Just when I was trying hard to pass as an all-American girl, this racial slur was outing me as an Asian before I was ready, before I became yellow and proud. It also maddened me to be mistaken for Japanese—not that racists care about these distinctions, especially when there’s historical bad blood between Koreans and Japanese.

You can call me Yoko now.
—yong soon min, artist and associate professor of studio art, University of California, Irvine

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Wednesday Link Love « The Feminist Texican on 30 Dec 2009 at 12:02 pm

    [...] Racialicious: Race, Gender, Art, and Yoko Ono [...]

  2. Ellen Papazian on 30 Dec 2009 at 8:27 pm

    [...] 2009 Here’s some positive feedback on my Yoko Ono feature in the latest issue of Bitch. And a great post from Racilicious about it, too. Categories: Uncategorized Leave a [...]

Comments

  1. JenRB wrote:

    It’s true, I do think she’s a bit mad, and sometimes her art leaves me cold, but there are other times that I love it. At the Sydney Biennale last year she installed a phone in the Art Gallery of New South Wales, which she would apparently call on occasion and chat to whoever answered it. I loved the idea of this random connection from across the world that was to be made with whoever happened to be walking past at that moment (I loitered for half an hour and gave up).(A few years beforehand she’d filled dozens of coffins with dirt and trees, it left me cold).

    But now that I think about it, I’ve never thought of her as a Japanese artist as such. She is just Yoko Ono. So much comes to mind when I think of her that her nationality is a late entry on the list.

  2. atlasien wrote:

    (Just a note… her family did go through hell in the war, but in other ways she had a privileged upbringing (access to educational opportunities, travel) because they were aristocratic and well-off.)

    I’m lucky that I actually grew up with a very positive conception of her. My mother always told me that the hate people had for Yoko Ono was disgusting and that she was an important figure in her own right.

    She’s a ground-breaking artist, and she had to work like crazy to accomplish what she did in life. It’s really irritating to see her being reduced in popular media as “that (insert racist slur) who broke up the Beatles”.

  3. atlasien wrote:

    @JenRB: I was able to see a great exhibition called “Scream Against the Sky: Japanese Art after 1945″. When you see her work in a context like that it’s obvious how it’s also very deeply Japanese. She was part of an international movement, and worked to promote her art as international, but that doesn’t make it any less Japanese.

  4. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    wow… that story about Offered Sacrifice is so fucked up. Much kudos to her for never giving up as a multi-media artist.

  5. GüeraLola wrote:

    I don’t want to lose my racialicious card. But I disliked yoko ono’s work, thinking it nothing more than “fake art”. To be fair my impression of her came from the mainstream media (tv mostly) AND I never saw any of her work, plus it does not help that I was raised surrounded by pro Beatles fans. I think next year I’m going try to check out her work and to make sure not to judge it by her persona.

  6. Adrienne wrote:

    You know, the Black woman self of me still has resentment towards her for this song.

    http://www.metrolyrics.com/woman-is-the-nigger-of-the-world-lyrics-yoko-ono.html

    And despite my resentment, I admire her chutzpah as an artist and in expressing her views.

  7. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    #5– no fucking surprise. the media loves to blame women for all the band break-ups. Yoko Ono, Nancy Spungeon, Courtney Love, etc….

  8. laura wrote:

    I’m sorry (actually no I’m not) but Yoko Ono is one of the most overrated people in the history of the late 20th century. Her so-called art wouldn’t get her into one of the ‘draw this picture’ art schools if it wasn’t for the fact that she was the widow of one of the Fab Five (one of the most overrated pop groups). And yes, I have seen some of her ‘art’ and believe me, the Emperor is stark naked.

  9. atlasien wrote:

    @laura “Her so-called art wouldn’t get her into one of the ‘draw this picture’ art schools if it wasn’t for the fact that she was the widow of one of the Fab Five.”

    Sigh.

    Yoko Ono was an internationally recognized avant-garde artist before she met John Lennon.

    I guess I need to repeat that:

    Yoko Ono was an internationally recognized avant-garde artist before she met John Lennon.

    Whether you think her kind of art is “real art” or not, that’s a simple historical fact.

    My husband always has a great rejoinder for people who dismiss avant-garde or conceptual or any kind of “difficult art” by saying “that’s so easy, even I could have done that.”

    “But… you didn’t.”

    @Adrienne: I seem to recall that Racialicious had a blog post about that song… perhaps it was last year, maybe someone has the link.

  10. mieko wrote:

    A lot of her work is too out there for me, but I definitely respect her for what she does, stands for, and how she’s handled all the publicity throughout her life.

    I’d take Yoko over Gaga any day.

  11. JenRB wrote:

    @atlasien thanks for that link, I’m on holidays at the moment so I’ll look when I get home (…yes, I am Racialiciousing via blackberry while lying on the beach).

    What I was getting at (with not thinking of her first as Japanese) is that everything she has done (from her marriage to Lennon to her protests etc) makes me think of her as one of the ultimate international figures. As in, when I think of Murakami, I think “Japanese pop artist” but when I think Yoko Ono, it’s difficult to say what comes first. Do people think it is possible for an artist to transcend their origins, to be come a world artist rather than a Country X artist? And then what makes her (or anyone) a Japanese (or whatever) artist (aside from being Japanese)?

  12. atlasien wrote:

    @JenRB

    “Do people think it is possible for an artist to transcend their origins, to be come a world artist rather than a Country X artist?”

    I don’t think that’s a question that can be answered as framed. You’d have to define “world artist”. Often, it means “represented in the media of urban, cosmopolitan, educated middle to upper classes living in an OECD country with no history of recent colonialism, speaking a widely-spoken European language and/or English”.

    The word “world” becomes more and more inexact the closer you look at it. “Eurocentric transnational culture” maybe comes a bit closer to what we really mean. “International” is safer as long as we understand it as meaning at least two or more countries… but not ALL countries.

    She’s a Japanese artist because she was born and raised in Japan. She’s also an American artist because she’s an immigrant and naturalized U.S. citizen. She’s an international artist because she explicitly aims and promotes herself internationally. There’s no reason those three identities can’t co-exist.

    There are a ton of similar examples. Alfred Hitchcock: deeply British, also an American immigrant who made classic American movies, had an international audience and created international influence.

    Immigrating/emigrating doesn’t mean transcending. It just makes things more complicated.

    There are cases where artists consciously, explicitly and publicly renounce their countries of origin. That’s different.

    Not that I’m a fan or even into country music that much… but you know who always struck me as the consummate international artist? Keith Urban. From a Polish family named Urbanski, born in New Zealand, raised in Australia, moved to Nashville to make his career, international fan base. People don’t think of country music as international because so much of it seems anti-cosmopolitan, but I wonder if it might be just as “international” as, say, hip-hop or reggae or salsa.

  13. dersk wrote:

    @JenRB – as far as people transcending the context of their culture and becoming world artists, wouldn’t the presence of non-native artists in every museum in the world be good evidence of that?

    @atlasien – The problem is, so much avant-garde art is just shallow and dumb, playing with sophomore level Wittgensteinen / Platonic what is life? style questions. Makes me want to find the artist, smack him or her about the head and shoulders with an old hardcover copy of Bertrand Russell, and make them go to night school and learn something interesting to say.

    The (very few) things I’ve seen of Ono’s seem to be of the ‘look at me’ variety, although I really like that telephone idea. It’d be even cooler to set it up so that the telephone made a random connection somewhere in the world, then rang at the museum.

  14. atlasien wrote:

    @dersk

    “The problem is, so much avant-garde art is just shallow and dumb”

    But I don’t think that’s a problem. It’s just a neutral fact. Most of any kind of cultural production or genre is shallow and dumb. Why single out avant-garde art? Much of non-avant-garde art is shallow and dumb, too. Witness this visual abortion by extraordinarily popular non-avant-garde artist Thomas Kinkade.

    I don’t think the shallowness and dumbness of much of avant-garde art is worthy of remarking on. Saying “that stuff sucks” doesn’t say anything about the genre itself. It seems more like a way to claim an identity by standing in opposition to another perceived identity.

  15. Jen wrote:

    @altasien You know what? I’m Australian, Keith Urban is married to our most famous actress export and they are on the cover of every gossip magazine every time they come to Sydney and yet I constantly forget that he is also an antipodean. So I think your point = well made!

  16. brownstocking wrote:

    Here’s the link requested:

    http://www.racialicious.com/2008/10/28/retro-flashback-ruminations-on-a-song-and-on-a-word/

    I think they were full of isht in that clip, and in their intent. And asking for a letter? You should know it’s wrong if you need a Black person to cosign.

    @ #7 you don’t think Nancy had anything to do with Sid’s decline and the demise of the Sex Pistols at their height? Serious question.