A Racialicious Dialogue on “The Princess and the Frog”

By Special Correspondents Nadra Kareem and Andrea Plaid

More than a year before its debut, “The Princess and the Frog” set tongues wagging. Some were overjoyed that Disney finally dedicated a feature to a black princess. Others criticized the studio’s history of racial gaffes in films such as “Aladdin” and “The Jungle Book” and wondered if Disney could change its track record with the “Princess and the Frog.” Some specifically took issue with “Princess” because the heroine, Tiana, spends more time on screen as a frog than as a black woman; because her prince, Naveen, isn’t black; and because the film portrays Voodoo questionably.

Now that the film’s out, what’s the verdict? Were these concerns warranted? Racialicious correspondents Nadra Kareem and Andrea Plaid recently caught a viewing of the film and dialogued about its merits and shortcomings. They also discussed whether “Princess,” which grossed $25 million its opening weekend, will be the first and last Disney production to feature an African-American heroine. That’s because, despite topping the box office when it came out, “Princess” sold far fewer tickets than recent Disney fare such as “Enchanted” did upon its release.

Warning: This dialogue contains spoilers.

Nadra Kareem: I quite enjoyed this film. I loved the music and Anika Noni Rose’s voice. I loved Disney’s return to hand-drawn animation. I found its depiction of race interesting as well. The movie’s set in 1920s New Orleans, but race is never explicitly brought up. The only time race is even hinted at is when the owners of the building Princess Tiana wants to buy refer to her “background.”

Andrea Plaid: But race is alluded to because the family lived in an all-black neighborhood and, clearly, her white friend has a lot more money than Tiana’s family. And even though Tiana’s mom wasn’t a domestic, she worked for the white family as their seamstress. I suspect the creatives may have counted on the adults in the audience to understand what they were seeing is a turn of the 20th-century NOLA where segregation was de jure and de facto.

NK: In some ways the movie ignores the racial situation of the time. I mean, Prince Naveen mistakes Tiana for a princess, which I liked. Her blackness didn’t exclude her from being royalty in his eyes. Also, no one objects to Tiana marrying Prince Naveen. So, what was your take on their relationship? Before the film’s release, there was much ado about Tiana being paired with a non-black prince.

AP: I loooooove everything about Naveen and Tiana’s relationship.

NK: This movie stood out because it didn’t seem like they were perfect strangers when they got married, which seems to be the case not just in other Disney films but in romantic comedies as well. There was some foundation to their romance. They knew each other’s faults but worked with them. They knew each other’s talents also.

AP: I loved the fact that Naveen supported Tiana’s dream of the restaurant, and she supported his dream of playing music. That’s a damn good relationship, and I think that’s missing in many a Disney flick.

NK: How did you feel about Tiana being a frog for so much of the film?

AP: I think that critique is utter bullshit.

NK: Yes, I mean, I didn’t forget what Tiana looked like in human form. You never forgot Tiana was a black lady. She was quite cute as a frog, too. Overall, I pretty much enjoyed everything about this movie except for its portrayal of Voodoo.

AP: So it wasn’t just me?

NK: Definitely not. On one hand I think the scenes portraying Voodoo will really scare young children. On the other hand, I was concerned that both children and adults unfamiliar with Voodoo would come away from “The Princess and the Frog” believing it to be evil rather than a belief system akin to Buddhism or Hinduism or what have you. I didn’t appreciate the African masks in the one Voodoo scene either. It indirectly linked Africa to evil.

AP: Exactly, along with the African masks, they had the “Samurai jack”-looking curlicue spirits and the Jack Skellington-esque “Voodoo man.”

NK: Although the character who practiced Voodoo—Dr. Facilier aka Shadowman—is clearly evil, the woman Tiana and Naveen visit to undo his work (turning them into frogs) is portrayed as a wise, caring old woman. Do you think the warmth of the Mama Odie character compensates for the demonization of Dr. Facilier? Clearly, she’s well versed in Voodoo, too.

AP: Mama Odie and her bayou hideaway really couldn’t compensate for the rather indelible impression of the Shadowman. Between [actor Keith David’s] voice and the animation of the character, Voodoo is seen as more bad than good when it’s really an ambivalent faith system. What I mean by ‘ambivalent’ is good and evil don’t function as polar opposites. A priest or priestess can use both forces.

NK: Another criticism I heard in relation to Shadowman is that he—the film’s villain—is black, while the prince is racially ambiguous (he’s from a fictional South American country). Personally, I think that their skin is so similar in shade that it’s doubtful little kids would distinguish dark skin as bad and lighter skin as good. Besides that, the film had so many other brown-skinned role models that one villain with brown skin can’t pose that much of a problem.

AP: Girl, thank you!

NK: In closing, let’s discuss how well “The Princess and the Frog” is doing at the box office. The film is off to a slow start as far as ticket sales are concerned. If it’s not a hit, will Tiana be Disney’s first and last black princess?

AP: No, because Disney and other companies are realizing the pent-up need for black folks to see themselves in these roles. If Disney doesn’t do it, then another studio may pick up on the idea.

NK: I certainly hope the thinking isn’t, ‘Well, we gave it a try, never again.’  I fear people might say the same about Obama, but I digress…

AP: I also think the fact that the stores can’t keep the merchandise on the shelves says a lot, too.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Big Fat Deal » Read Anything Good Lately? on 08 Jan 2010 at 8:01 pm

    [...] I saw The Princess and the Frog, which I loved, I of course had to go see what Racialicious had to say about it, especially since I had read this essay, discussing some concerns. I had been [...]

Comments

  1. Natalie wrote:

    I cannot wait to see this movie! The only reason I haven’t yet is that I can’t find anyone who wants to go with me. (Most of my friends are too cheap to see movies in the theatre, plus we’re at an awkward age for Disney movies– mid-20s minus kids.)

    I also haven’t seen a Disney movie in years and years, and the only reason I’m excited about this one is because of the buzz around the black princess/heroine.

    I hope that even if the movie doesn’t excel at the Box Office that it has a lot of longevity in terms of DVD sales and merchandise and stuff, because I’d love to see more diversity in the kids’ canon.

  2. BSK wrote:

    “Others criticized the studio’s history of racial gaffes in films such as “Aladdin” and “The Jungle Book” and wondered if Disney could change its track record with the “Princess and the Frog.””

    I’m curious, as someone who has not really watched/studied these films, are there similar gaffes relating to race/culture/etc. in the predominantly white Disney films? I know that there are issues related to gender roles and beauty standards, but are there issues with how the French are represented in the Hunchback of Notre Dame or whether other white cultural groups or whites in general are also represented unfairly?

    Basically, is Disney generally ignorant in their portrayals of a race/culture and particularly ignorant of non-white races/cultures? Or do they get most things right when dealing with whites and get most things wrong when dealing with non-whites?

    (I recognize that even if they do gaffe on the white cultures, it is not as problematic as gaffing on others. I’m just curious to know how well does Disney do their homework when attempting to represent characters fairly?)

  3. emjaybee wrote:

    You know, I read the prince as mixed-race; in the final scenes where his parents show up, they are not white, to my eyes. Their accents sounded French to me, not Spanish, so I actually thought their fictional country was something like Morocco or Haiti, an African or Caribbean nation with a French colonial culture. I was actually surprised when a coworker mentioned that the “white” prince’s relationship with Tiana was a cause of controversy, because of this.

    I’m white; I took my little boy to see it because I love animation and thought he would enjoy it, and he did. I have seen a little reluctance to take their kids to see it by some white people I know, but I think it will gather steam, especially once it’s on video, it’s too good a story.

  4. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    @BSK:

    they criticized Aladdin because in the beginning there was a character singing about how Muslims would cut your hands off. Naturally, it was offensive, so they cut it out of the movie.

    The Jungle Book– seriously, did you really need to ask? Have you seen it? The animal characters were clearly racist, minstrel-y caricatures of African Americans… and it was supposed to be set in India.

    for the longest time, Disney animated features have had racist caricatures of African Americans and minority groups, with such glaring examples as SONGS OF THE SOUTH (1944) and FANTASIA (1940).

  5. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    I have seen a little reluctance to take their kids to see it by some white people I know

    seriously? Some white parents are reluctant to take their kids to see The Princess and the Frog because I presume– it has a black princess?!?!?

    What. the. FUCK.

  6. Tamara wrote:

    Maybe it’s me, but it seems like Disney isn’t marketing this film as heavily as its other “princess” films. I haven’t seen as many commercials, ads, etc., and as Lisa Price mentioned in another article here, there aren’t the usual tie-ins from McDonald’s and the usual suspects.

  7. BSK wrote:

    DIMA-

    I was, in no way, attempting to deny that such ridiculous representations of non-whites litter Disney films. I apologize if it came across that way. I fully realize they are there. Rather, I was asking if they also make gaffes (though not with the same intensity) when dealing with white groups or cultures. In general, is Disney lazy/irresponsible when it comes to representing any other cultures, or are they specifically and uniquely ignorant to non-white cultures in a way that they are not when dealing with white cultures.

  8. BSK wrote:

    As to whether parents are taking their kids to it and how Disney is promoting it, I will take an informal poll of my students (5-year-olds) when I return to school after the holidays. They let me know what they are seeing and what is being promoted to them through their play and conversations. I should be able to tell pretty quickly if they have taken to TPATF in the same way they did others. Some further conversations should let me know if they A) are aware of it but haven’t seen it, B) are not aware of it, or C) if they have seen it but it did not resonate with them.

  9. Jha wrote:

    Tamara: It definitely isn`t as well-marketed. That drives me insane. I hear in Malaysia that it`s not getting a very wide distribution – only two shows a day. Here in Halifax, a couple of theatres are playing them, but they`re out in the middle of butt-fuck nowhere and it`s a huge commute out there.

  10. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    BSK:

    I don’t know about recent Disney films’ efforts to “understand” other cultures, but for the longest time, I was always an admirer of Walt Disney. I have a few books about him and about early Disney films. So I can tell you what I remember from reading books about early Disney films.

    When Disney was in charge of Disney films from the 1930s up to his death in 1966, he always demanded that everyone– animators and writers– do research and study whatever they had to do for the story, to make it “authentic.”

    They had to study zoology and animals when they were working on BAMBI and DUMBO in the 1940s. They also had to study clothes, music, rituals, and particular styles (of housing, architecture and buildings, etc…) to get the characterization and styling right.

    I think I might have heard here and there that Disney was racist and also anti-Semitic, but I don’t know how true it was.

    a lot of early Disney films usually involved 1 or 2 main human protagonist with a huge cast of talking animals. The human protagonist was usually WHITE– and these animals were based on black people or POC.

    the exception was THE JUNGLE BOOK, with an Indian boy and a cast of talking animals, who were based on African Americans.

    *sigh*

  11. nick wrote:

    To be honest the only thing I really remember about The Jungle Book (and it’s been over two decades since I saw it) is Baloo the bear.

    I thought he was pretty cool.

  12. Phrone wrote:

    I loved it. I definitely thought Naveen was Latino: the accent, etc. I didn’t think that he was white.

    The voodoo thing got to me too…I’m glad they put in Mama Odie, but I think it would have been better if she’d played more of a role and did more magic — that way, she could balance out the Shadow Man.

    I really hope they promote this film more…probably it’s losing some thunder because of Avatar, but hopefully it will do well enough to show the studios that black princesses are commercially viable. My concern is that if the movie isn’t an absolute success, people will use it as a sign to say “see, there’s no market” — even though it’s been doing pretty well.

  13. emjaybee wrote:

    DIMA, yes, I agree with you: WTF, parents? But then, I live in Texas…

  14. Jha wrote:

    DIMA @ 10: Yeah, Walt started that tradition of studying what they were about to portray, which applied to a lot of things, except black people. They did a ton of work for Fantasia, but the old racist portrayal of black people got in the way. Not to mention, even if we did get a lot of old-school Disney princesses, they didn’t have a lot of personality, so… yeah.

  15. Holly Steel wrote:

    @BMK:

    Well, Disney certainly messed up with Hercules. That’s an example of them messing up Greek/Roman mythology (Hercules is the Roman name, but they use Zeus and Hades, which are IIRC Greek names). That’s the only one that’s stuck in my mind. Disney is not well-known for amazing accuracy.

    @DIMA:
    Muslims cut off your hand? I thought it was just Arabs. It’s supposed to be set in some sort of pre-Islam place (or is it?) so I thought it was referring to the Arabs (and there were a lot of Arab-American groups complaining about it portraying Arabs as people that cut off your hand if you’re ugly).

  16. Rose wrote:

    I assumed that Naveen was of French Colonial origin– but that’s not based on anything other than my gut reaction. The actor who voiced him is Brazilian, but I don’t think Disney wanted the character to be read as being Latino– rather, I think they wanted him to be as racially ambiguous as possible.

    Besides, no matter what race Naveen is or isn’t, I love seeing inter-cultural/racial relationships on the big screen. All too often, the manly white hero ends up with the shrinking violet white damsel in distress, and their two token black best friends end up together. It seems like there’s an unwritten mainstream movie rule that couples have to “match.” Drives me batty.

    So anyway, I loved “Princess,” but agree wholeheartedly with the criticisms about the portrayal of voodoo. I hope Disney has the good sense to return to the warmth of hand-animated movies– and take advantage of their platform to promote positive portrayals of characters of all racial, cultural, and religious backgrounds.

  17. XB wrote:

    Finally posted in the right article

    I never thought of Naveen as Latino, achedanza! means It Dances! in Italian. that’s one of his catch phrases, he comes from across the sea and the name of his country is macdonia, i’m thinking he’s from morocco or north africa which would help explain the Indian name.

    I loved the movie, it’s so nice that I can finally smile when I see my sisters dressed as a Disney princess that looks like them.

    Though the presentation of Vodou really irked me

  18. Diana wrote:

    If he’s from Macedonia hes from eastern Europe within Greece. During the time that Alexander the great was king of Macedonia, his empire stretched all the way to India but there are many other reasons why he could be named Naveen.

  19. Kenny wrote:

    Sometimes the inter racial pairings onscreen are to avoid an all Black,all Asian or all Hispanic couple.A White hero with a women of color is not new or ground breaking.Dorothy Dandridge was playing opposite White guys in the fifties.Some actressess of color are more likely to be cast opposite a White guy than one in their culture.

  20. Shauna G. wrote:

    Is this movie really not being marketed much? I don’t know if it’s because I live in NYC, but I have seen a lot of commercials for it before the movie came out, as well as phone booth ads, plus there’s the fact they had a very big early screening for the movie that included a really fun after party where families could meet the princesses, play games, draw, and etc. It felt like they were treating her like a queen compared to the other princesses. There’s also been a lot of specials, plus Anika Noni Rose has been on several shows promoting the movie too.

    Sad to hear it’s not getting big releases in other countries though. ): But hopefully word of mouth will keep this afloat and open the door for more 2D animated movies, as well as more casts with PoC for family films.

  21. Westerly wrote:

    In regards to the OP:
    “NK: How did you feel about Tiana being a frog for so much of the film?

    AP: I think that critique is utter bullshit.”

    I’ve levelled this critique at the film myself (if only in passing), as have others so naturally I don’t think that it’s ‘bullshit’ at all.

    I’m not a graphic artist – nor am I any kind of expert on animation.

    But one of the arguments that has led to limited, scant representations of black people in all kinds of animated features (or mediums that utilise animation) is the meme of the ‘inherent’ difficulty of representing black skin tones (lighting, blends, and if computer graphics are involved, pixellation) whereas frogs are ‘easier’ and perhaps, cheaper…

    Also, when people note that Tiana spends most of the film as a frog it is in reference to a long-standing precedent, rather than an expression of wilful, exacting pique.

    There may be many positive things about the film and the relationship portrayed but that doesn’t mean that Tiana and Naveen still won’t end up part of Disney’s African-American animal menagerie – especially if the film’s not getting much play.

    The menagerie includes:
    - Sunflower the Centaur (Fantasia)
    - The Dumbo Crows (Jim and Crow)
    - The Jungle Book (Ugh. Enough said.)
    - The Little Mermaid (Sebastian the – West-Indian crab?)
    - The Lion King (Stolen Japanese story, African setting, Jason Weaver singing but not voicing the protagonist, and Earl Jones patriarchal rumbling tones – but no human black characters.)
    - Mulan: Mushu the ‘jive-talking dragon.
    And so on…

    (Cobra Bubbles from “Lilo and Stitch” is both black AND identifiably human at least… but nobody could argue that he was a protagonist.]

    I think it goes all the way back to the development of early rotoscope which was based on the movement of Cab Calloway no less…dancing as a walrus while Betty Boop looks on fearfully. (This is Fleischer studios, not Disney mind.)

    Even though they are the film’s protagonists – somehow, they STILL end up with a physical portrayal ( – frogs this time round – ) that doesn’t really contradict Disney’s history.

    I have yet to be convinced that talking singing, dancing animals *aren’t* Disney’s easy, lazy default-mode when it comes to portraying African-Americans (and blacks in general) on-screen.

    But, YMMV.

  22. Michelle wrote:

    I was very perplexed by the Prince Naveen character. He’s not from Macedonia, he’s from the fictional country of Maldonia. I’m sure the likeness is deliberate, and because he spoke French I also assumed he was north African, from one of the French colonies.

    But… then… his name is Naveen, and his features look decidedly Indian to me. His parents look Indian to me as well. His butler is clearly an Englishman, which doesn’t make *sense* exactly, but since the English colonized India, it at least makes sense that he’d be in the company of the English if he was Indian.

    But… his accent sounds South American. That could be because the voice actor is Brazilian, but…

    But, but, but…

  23. Katie wrote:

    I don’t know if this will clear up any of the racially ambiguous Prince Naveen confusion, but…

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/lorenjavier/4082511470/in/photostream/

    That’s a picture of who is playing Prince Naveen (and Princess Tiana) at Disneyland.

  24. PPR_Scribe wrote:

    I am with Westerly: I’m still annoyed that the first Black Princess has to be a frog through much of the film. I’m hoping that we will see a sequel where Tiana will be portrayed throughout as a human woman.

  25. Valkyrie607 wrote:

    I simply can’t hear the name Naveen without thinking of Naveen Andrews… and drooling… and having to take a swig of cold water…

    Makes it hard to picture him as anything but Indian.

    I guess I’ll have to go see the film.

  26. perpetual explosion wrote:

    @BSK: I thought the depiction of the French in Beauty and the Beast was at best patronizing, especially with Lumiére and all of his “ou-hou-hou!”s. But still, it’s nothing compared to the racism in earlier Disney films.

    @Michelle: Naveen’s parents might have hired an English butler to show off their wealth and worldliness. A butler was more than just a servant, he was a symbol of his employer’s estate, his job was just as much to give an impression as to bring tea, and English butlers were considered the best in this regard. It would make sense that a family of the Indian nobility would have an English butler brought in, if anything else to show off to their friends whenever they entertained.