Dear Old Morehouse

by Guest Contributor Dumi Lewis, originally published at Uptown Notes


Dear Old Morehouse,

I’ve been trying to avoid writing this for some time now. As an alumnus of the institution, it’s hard for me to see you in such condition. Many of my fellow alumni complained of your disrepair and your besmirched image when they heard about students being beaten for their sexuality, shooters graduating, and cross-dressing, but I have bigger concerns. While all these things mattered to me, they did not disturb me because of what was being done to the image of our institution; they disturbed me because they demonstrated that Dear Old Morehouse was terribly unequipped to deal with the realities and lives that Black men in America live now. In fact, it is the Old Morehouse that is more dangerous to me than any student with a gun, sagged pants, or high heels would ever be. Let me explain.

When I visited Morehouse for the first time, it was about 1994, I remember seeing hanging banners and brochures that talked about the development of leaders, community servants, and caring connected brothers. The culmination of these developments was to be the Morehouse Man. I remember reading about the crown that Morehouse held up for its students so that one day they too would embody the Morehouse Mystique. I was sold. I was ready to be in that number. I was ready to be at the only institution of higher education dedicated fully to the education of men of African descent in the United States. But like most things, I soon found out all that glittered was not gold.

When I arrived, I remember hearing brothers commonly refer to the Morehouse Mistake, not Mystique. I remember seeing Samuel L. Jackson toted out as a shining alumnus, only to learn he was actually kicked out while he was there. I was there when I realized Morehouse students had no trouble admitting rape happened, but sadly refused to admit that Morehouse students could or would rape their Spelman sisters. I know, now I’m airing dirty laundry, in your eyes, but hear me out. Morehouse, if you are committed to Black men, then you’ve got to do better. You, no WE, have got to work to make better men for the 21st century, not the 20th. It often feels like each time I hear about your “new moves” and “plans” you’re becoming more committed to making a middle class Black man who would exist in the 1950s or 60s, not in 2009. From clothing to interviews, Dear Old Morehouse, there is much more happening with and to Black men than you’re equipped to handle.

See, in the past, Morehouse was about accepting and graduating the “cream of the crop” amongst the Black bourgeoisie and claiming the production of the Black intelligentsia. We all know, at least at the House, that Martin Luther King, Jr. — our most well known alumnus– came from a relatively well-to-do background and he wasn’t the most stunning student. But it would be on the red clay hills of Georgia that he got a deeper social, spiritual, and political education which would lead him to change the world. It is that image that you fed us and feed young brothers who come to the gates these days. You celebrate your role as one of the top feeders to graduate schools and Fortune 500 companies among institutions of higher education.  You highlight that our alumni are Rhodes Scholars, former surgeon generals and are changing the world around the globe, as many institutions do. The problem is, those men are the ones who made it, and it is likely that they still would have made it without Morehouse. Sometimes I think you point to exceptional success from the past in an effort to keep people from noticing what you are doing wrong or simply not doing it the present. So many who come to our campus, who desire to be better men, are not given what they need because you are asking them to trade themselves for your idea of success. Dear Old Morehouse, success does not look, sound, or feel the same for all.

I almost feel like you’re in denial; we can’t keep living a lie. I’ve got to tell you five things that you seem to deny too often. First, Affirmative Action did change you and who attended you. Affirmative Action allowed a number of the brothers who would have attended HBCUs in the past to attend traditional Ivys. We have to recognize that we don’t have the economic resources to compete with the Harvards, Yales or even smaller liberal arts schools. Many brothers get drawn to these schools because they have a financial safety net and set of offerings that make it difficult for them to sign on Morehouse’s dotted line. Second, the day of male breadwinner and unquestioned male leadership is done. While the sisters at Spelman were over there involved in the freedom struggle with us, they were also noticing we were often working on “liberation for half a race.” While we spend copious amounts of time sitting in orientations and Crown Forums that convince us that we’ve “made it” because so many brothers didn’t, we’re falsely inflating ourselves and using these bloated egos to plot the path towards a wayward progress. Third, style is one of hallmarks of Blackness. Spending time trying to reduce and refashion style is like harnessing youth, a noble thought but likely to leave you more embarrassed than successful. Hip-Hop culture is here to stay and reflects a lot of what we face as a people and what many in our community aspire to emulate. Hip-Hop culture is art and yes, art and life do imitate one another. Hip-Hop is, was, and shall be anti-establishment; the more you regulate it, the more it will battle you. Fourth, gay men are Morehouse Men and they should no longer be silent and covering. For too long, Morehouse treated gay and queer brothers like the Loch Ness monster, often talked about but never fully confirmed. News flash: being non-heterosexual is neither a psychological nor a social deviance. It’s reality! Fifth, Black boys are in crisis and you have to adapt to this crisis as well. With 50% of Black boys who begin high school in the inner-city not graduating with their classmates on time, you must realize your pool of applicants and admits is going to look different. These brothers mostly come with 4.0 potential, not 4.0 GPA’s. The question becomes, what can we do to move potential to reality?! What are the supports we’re putting in place for the brothers who beat the odds and make it to the House? I am honestly not sure if you are ignorant or simply ignoring, but either way, we’ve got to do better. I seriously think that if you start to deal with these five facts, you can move from being Dear Old Morehouse to a Dear New Morehouse.

Oh I can hear you now, “Brother, we are getting ‘new’!” Unfortunately your “new” is old. With each passing year, I swear you move a step backwards towards your former self… or at least an image that you believed yourself to be. From interviews to dress codes, you’re trying to create a brand of respectable middle class black males that went out with the last sputters of the Civil Rights Movement. Yes, alumni get excited when they hear, “we will no longer tolerate…” because we all have a narrative about how Morehouse was and how it has changed. Don’t be surprised if people co-sign on your reversal of the clock without seeing the bigger picture. They’ll support more assemblies, more Crown Forums, more rules, less braids, less sagging, less gays… oops, just kidding on the last one. I know that subject is touchy in our community. Have you forgotten, it was not what was outside that made the Morehouse Man it was what was inside? The most valuable lessons are those learned collectively through struggle, failure and success.  Not from imposition, dress codes, or dress policies. College is one of the few times that Black men may be able to explore fuller and truer selves and your hallowed halls are the ideal place to do so. Instead, you threaten to lock down and narrow those very halls. I want to hear that you’re developing new models of manhood, ones that are not patriarchal, ones that deal with the needs of Black men and boys who need healing, ones that let boys become the Men of their choosing and of their community’s wanting. Few of the rules that you are implementing are creating a healthier pathway for Black men, they’re simply polishing the same “broken” brothas and yet you wonder why it is not working.

Quite regularly now, I receive emails asking “What is Morehouse doing?” Some come in agreement, some come in disagreement, but the ones I value most are the those that come from a place of love for the development of all Black men. The individual policies that you have drawn up are just echoes of the world that Black males now create and inhabit. If Dear Old Morehouse is truly interested in living up to its missions and declarations, the ones that got me to attend, the ones that got me to link up and sing, the ones that got me to love my institution enough to critique its actions, then we’ve got to begin from a point of understanding and expansion, not from a point of rigidity and constriction. Unless we acknowledge that Dear Old Morehouse must become Dear New Morehouse to serve the whole of our community, we’ll be doing this sad dance every 8 months. I look forward to your response and hope WE can grow to meet that crown of which Howard Thurman so eloquently made us aware.

In humility and community,

Dr. R. L’Heureux Lewis

Ndugu Dumi Eyi di yiye

Class of 2000

(Image via  nyleharris flckr stream)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. flip flopping joy » Blog Archive » Dear Old Morehouse… on 04 Nov 2009 at 2:19 pm

    [...] A letter to you: I want to hear that you’re developing new models of manhood, ones that are not patriarchal, ones that deal with the needs of Black men and boys who need healing, ones that let boys become the Men of their choosing and of their community’s wanting. Few of the rules that you are implementing are creating a healthier pathway for Black men, they’re simply polishing the same “broken” brothas and yet you wonder why it is not working. [...]

  2. links for 2009-11-04 « The Interactive Education of L.M.S on 05 Nov 2009 at 2:01 am

    [...] Dear Old Morehouse by Guest Contributor Dumi Lewis, originally published at Uptown Notes. I like that this article looks at many issues that cropping up in not just Morehouse, but HBCUs around the country that are dealing with changes in the community but not able to move at the rapid rate of change. [...]

Comments

  1. atlasien wrote:

    Living in Atlanta, this was pretty big news. I remember hearing all the morning DJs coming down on the side of the dress code and spouting all kinds of ignorant homophobic and transphobic nonsense. Sigh…

    Your post clearly shows how this is just one sign of a backward-facing vision. Very illuminating.

    I was behind a woman in a grocery checkout line once, and overheard her talking on the phone, telling some friend: “Don’t let your son go to Morehouse — they’ll turn him gay”.

  2. LL wrote:

    I appreciate where you’re coming from and I appreciate the need of an institution that upholds the tenants you speak of, but I think Morehouse is not that institution.

    I have seen what happens to HBCU’s when they accept those students who barely made it to college. They end up with alumni who go on to become middle managers, secretaries and the like. Those students have definitely been enriched and their lives are the better for it, but they are not changing the face of the nation or leading the race into a new era of prosperity. They are doing better than their parents (maybe) and attending the alumni dinners, but they are not bringing prestige to the college name or donations (necessary for private institutions).

    HBCU’s are struggling because of dwindling alumni resources and poor acquisition rates among the best and brightest of the African American pool of high school graduates and that is not going to change if they begin to lower their standards (GPA, dress code, etc). In fact I think they need to do the opposite.

    If Morehouse is to survive to mold the Black elite of the future they need to turn out men who rival the graduates of Harvard, Yale, etc. Where else can you get an elite education with a focus on African American culture?

    Morehouse needs alumni that will be able to contribute dollars and hail their merits to the nation to attract students who are able to succeed and compete with the best and the brightest of the nation. Morehouse wants their students to go on to become Senators, Surgeon Generals, Fortune 500 entrepreneurs. Frankly, struggling students need not apply. Students who have a problem with the dress code need not apply.

    I will agree though this focus upholding the patriarchy and shunning the LBGT community spits in the face of their so-called commitment to equality, but I think that is going to have to spring forth from a community of students who are forward thinking.

  3. sweeterjuice wrote:

    I didn’t go to an HBCU, but I have to say I’m surprised that “black boys are in crisis” came up fifth and last on Dr. Lewis’s list of things that Morehouse is in denial about.

    From what I can tell in casual conversation with a decidedly non-scientific random selection of alumni from assorted HBCUs (friends and work colleagues), that’s the primary concern of theirs, far above and beyond issues of cultural conflicts and gender politics. Incoming black students as some HBCUs–male and female–are woefully unprepared for the rigors of college life. They’re coming out of high school not only dealing with significant life disadvantages (such as poverty, criminal records, dysfunctional families, etc.), but with poor academic skills, no concept of scholarly discipline, and–most upsettingly –a complete and utter disdain for the opportunities that college offers them.

    To be frank, it appears that many students entering some HBCUs do not have currently have 4.0 potential, and should never have been admitted to any college. What they actually need is a stable life environment combined with individualized attention and another two or three years of high school, so they can develop college-level skills. Instead, some of the HBCUs seem to have become almost a dumping ground for crisis black students, while black students without those disadvantages choose other schools. St. Petersburg Times editorial board member Bill Maxwell talked about this phenomenon in his articles covering his two years teaching at another HBCU, Stillman:

    http://bit.ly/4qymTf
    http://bit.ly/AKRmS
    http://bit.ly/4kTR5x

    The sad reality is that until those HBCUs find a way to come to grips with the crisis student, the colleges will be completely unable to address Dr. Lewis’s other concerns. It’s hard to get students to accept gender and sexual equity if they can’t be bothered to attend a class where these topics are explored and shown to be relevant to their lives. And if the students treat the collegiate experience as one party after another, they won’t find it easy to get the academic leaders to listen to them when the argue that Hip Hop style has a place in art and life beyond that of the latest Kanye West public idiocy.

    I suspect that, in order to address the needs of the crisis student, Morehouse and other HBCUs would have to decide whether or not they want to continue to be traditional academic colleges or universities.

    A college can’t really help anyone–let alone a black student in crisis– transition into college. That’s supposed to be the job of the student’s high school and family. The HBCUs would either have to tighten their standards to eliminate admitting these students entirely (which would decrease their student body substantially and probably spell death for these schools) or they’d have to abandon their original mission and become, in essence, comprehensive junior colleges focused on remedial and transfer programs. That would help crisis students tremendously, but would probably be a very expensive change to make, would dramatically change the culture on the campuses, and in the case of Morehouse, would hurt the perception of the school as being part of the “Black Ivy League”.

    It’s a tough situation, and not one that the HBCUs could have seen coming. I hope Morehouse and other HBCUs find a way to help these students. I don’t doubt that there are plenty of crisis students who can go on to great things if they receive the support they need. The problem is that right now, there don’t appear to be any historically black academic institutions positioned to help them.

  4. n wrote:

    I think of the elite schools as a combination of college education and finishing school. If students are being groomed, no pun intended, to take their places in corporate america or the political sphere, as long as corporate america requires a certain standard of dress and behavior, I believe the dress code is appropriate. So long as it is not offensive ie no natural hair.

    It isn’t, IMO, a matter of going back to the past. It is a matter of realizing that one reason minorities and the underclass have a hard time succeeding is because there is no place for them to learn the unspoken rules of the ruling class. Whether those rules are right or wrong is, I believe, a separate issue. But if you are saying not only that you provide a good education, but that you are molding the future leaders, you have to prepare them to fit into that world.
    If, once in there, they choose to work from the inside to change things and expand the rules to be more inclusive, thats good.

  5. thebiblophile wrote:

    “I want to hear that you’re developing new models of manhood, ones that are not patriarchal, ones that deal with the needs of Black men and boys who need healing, ones that let boys become the Men of their choosing and of their community’s wanting. Few of the rules that you are implementing are creating a healthier pathway for Black men, they’re simply polishing the same “broken” brothas and yet you wonder why it is not working.”

    Beautiful. Thank you. What a vision. I really appreciate how thoughtful this is – the issues that are raised and the solution offered.

    @2 LL

    Is prestige really all that its about? If Morehouse churns out very prestigious, but deeply wounded, Black men who ultimately do not act in ways that support community, does Morehouse really achieve its goals?

    I’m uncomforable with your devaluing of secretaries and middle managers. It seems you could also throw in teachers and anyone who doesn’t pull a 6-figure job or gain prestige and elite status – mind you in a system that often works to bar or prevent more than a chosen few from “rising to the top.’ What’s the impact of showing value only for who is deemed elite and prestigious? What about redefining what makes a person presigious.

    I hear and agree about needing the economic and academic strength to out-maneuver compettion and to establish Morehouse as a force in education, however, modeling success on elitism, traditonal capitalism, and prestige reifies exactly the things you said Morehouse should work on; namely the treatment of the LGBT community and patriarchy. Why should students have to lead this charge?

    If Morehouse is ready to educate the Black elite, it should be ready to make critical changes in its approach and commitments to address homophobia and patriarchy in an appropriate way so that students don’t have to be the only ones burdened with this. It’s like being the only Black person in a room, and every one wants you to educate and change racism. It’s not a fair equation.

  6. deathblossom wrote:

    @LL

    If you’re really admitting forward thinking students instead of those who barely graduated from high school, you don’t need a dress code. You mentioned turning out students like Harvard, but Harvard and these other Ivys don’t have a dress code. Neither does MIT and yet we manage to get the interview, dress appropriately for the interview, get that Fortune500/Google/Med School spot, and then go back to class cross-dressing, in a toga, or in sweatshirts that would get us gunned down in an airport.

    Okay, that last one is a bad example and a few of the presentation-based business classes do have a dress code, but my point is that restrictive policies like this are indicative of either poorly prepared entrants or a failing support and academic system. They’re trying to stick a bandaid on a leg that needs to be amputated. If they were really putting academic pressure on their students and admitting students that were independent, focused, and supported, this wouldn’t be a problem.

    Or rather, it shouldn’t be. MIT culture operates on a tradeoff where you work hard – damned hard – and those few hours that you aren’t, you can do what you want. Heck, you can do what you want when you’re working if you get the job done. Essentially, freedom of expression is a reward, no, a nessicity for operating in such a high pressure system. To take that away to protect some administrator’s image fears is to take away the little bit of life, individuality, and happiness we have left would either produce hive drones or riotous/opressed students who end up in counseling or asked to leave the Institute.

    So yes, I think this code is unfair and they are scapegoating clothing and LBGT students for a more serious problem and I find it sad that only three members of their campus queer community voted against it, but I am not surprised. I try to imagine this happening here and I’m sorry, but we’d laugh them out the door.

  7. SAL wrote:

    Many of these comments are very reactionary. No, they are grotesque. One wonders what planet some people live on–planet privilege, planet classist, planet myopic, planet blame the victim and not the institutions that have churned out a generation of human beings who are considered throwaways. How freaking sad.

  8. Afro-chan wrote:

    Spelman class of 2000 here. Thank you for your words. I vowed that if I ever had a son I would discourage him from going to Morehouse. It always seemed Morehouse wanted to develop straight black males at the expense of women and homosexuals. Its mantra didn’t fit with what was actually going on at the campus.

    Dr. Lewis, if you could do it over again would you attend Morehouse?

  9. thewayoftheid wrote:

    Echoing SAL here. I’m choking on the classism of some of these responses.

  10. shah8 wrote:

    Well, I probably wouldn’t. Let’s be serious here, Morehouse College is too expensive for many serious students, and too poor to accomodate good students with few resources of his own. They’re making money from the loans that burdened an often overburdened kid. When I was there at the end half of the 90’s, a huge portion of the freshmen never makes it to sophomorehood. At the end of the day, the graduation rates are frickin’ abysmal. Last numbers I have is 55%. That’s why the homophobia and dress code. Marketing a bad product with a bit of macho.

    Bytheby, Morehouse DOES gets its teeny share of the very high IQ set. A few of them are in Business or Finance–premed/dual degree engineering grabs most, with sprinkles in the other fields. That’s kind of the issue–they can only give scholarships to very few people with nothing but ruinous loans to Joe Schmo as “financial aid”. Anyone who is actually a good but not great student has other places that offers grants and other real help. So that bottom quarter of incoming freshmen is totally ripped off.

  11. ashlynn wrote:

    I definitely agree with shah8 (#10). My sister is a junior at Howard, and these last three years have been nothing but disastrous. Finanical aid is garbage. She’s spent the last three years, the latter two especially, stressing because she is literally a student one day and kicked out b/c of finances the next. My mother has worked for decades to accumulate savings, and taking out loans has all but ruined her credit.

    Oh, but the parties are great!

    When it was my turn to apply to schools, I didn’t even sniff at any HBCU’s, because I already knew what that game was all about. The purpose of making positive young role models has all but gone out of the window in favor of taking what little money a lot of these students have and not providing quality in return. As a member of the LGBT community, I already knew that I wouldn’t be too welcome after long, and neither would my LGBT friends. HBCU’s have continually driven potential away because they continually cling to the ideal of strong, heterosexual, uber elite Black men who cannot reach back into their communities because they are just that far up their asses, and smart, but second-tier women who are ultimately to take a backseat to the men they are required to stand by.

  12. SCPeachPrincess wrote:

    I have to say that like # 11, I did not attend a HBCU. Mind you, I was accepted by Spelman (which, to be honest, I applied to as a joke), but knew from the outset that most HBCUs, incl those in the AUC were not at the level of the school that eventually became my alma mater.
    Diversity was key to me- be it one’s race/ethnicity, location (wanted more than just a regional population), and while I didn’t know at the time, sexual orientation. I feel that many HBCUs, Morehouse & Spelman included are kidding themselves if they believe that they can ensure every incoming student is straight, former member of J&J, and willing to conform to antiquated rules.

  13. K.lo wrote:

    @ashlynn

    How do you distinguish between a first-tier and a second-tier black woman? Based on the college they attended? If they went to a white institution with a similar rank on US News and World Report would that then make them a first-tier person? I really don’t understand where all of this venom comes from.

    We went from a very thoughtful critique of an institution struggling to keep up with the times to the denigration of people who are fortunate enough to pursue higher education.

    @Dumi

    Thank you for writing this.

    I was a student at Spelman around the same time you were there. These are the same frustrations I’ve had with Spelman (and Morehouse), I haven’t been able to put them into words.

    This: Second, the day of male breadwinner and unquestioned male leadership is done.

    Yes, yes, yes. I always wondered how I was on a “progressive campus” and so many people were trying to shove male as leader down my throat.

    I can’t tell you how many times I had to fight for things that seemed normal on other campuses. Such as the freedom to do an internship during the semester. My case made it all the way to the president’s office.

    Although I had challenges, I’m still glad I went. I just wish that I could convince fellow alum to give contribute in a major way.

    @sweeterjuice-
    Even if the competition for admission to Morehouse is not as stiff as it was previously, the admitted students are not just those who barely graduated from college. In all of these discussions of higher ed. I feel like we overemphasize the extremes: Harvard, Princeton, Yale, and then people who barely get into community colleges. There are a lot of schools in between with varying levels of admissions competition.

    I went on to earn a degree from an Ivy League school as did many of my classmates, and none of us felt any less prepared than our counterparts who went to majority schools. In some ways (my Spelman grad friends anyway) have the benefit of strong support system from our undergrad institutions that others lack.

    I’m grateful for growing up in a time that I could select the school that was right for me as opposed to the school with the most name recognition. I imagine if I was going to college now, I would have to pick differently….which is a shame.

  14. LL wrote:

    I think some people have misunderstood where I’m coming from.

    As for the question of prestige- Teachers and secretaries can definitely be influential. I never said they were not, but a public school can provide that level of education and for much cheaper than the $25-$30K a year that Morehouse is charging.

    Middle Managers and Supervisors have a sphere of influence that is important, localized, but small. Morehouse is not turning out 30,000 students a year. They have to get the most bang for their buck. They have to turn out a small but powerful force of game changers to maintain their prestige and you can only do that by accepting and cultivating highly motivated, culturally sensitive and highly intelligent students.

    Morehouse needs to ask the question: Why are those top-tier black students choosing Harvard over Morehouse (they cost is relatively the same to attend)?

    At 75+K for a bachelor’s degree any student who walks out of those doors should be able to “code switch” with the best of them. For that kind of money the name of Morehouse should provide them with the skills and the access to break the barriers that still exist for people of color.For that kind of money you need to do more than teach me how to be of service to the community. Your local church/mosque/synagogue/community center can do that and they’ll do it for free.

    Is Yale more attuned to the needs of black students? Are those schools more progressive? I would say no, but those students are choosing those schools over HBCU’s for a reason.

    Practical reasons like name recognition and prestige (yes, it has a currency when you’re looking for a job), resources, and yes diversity.

    As for the question of student led change- It has always been the burden of the young to move the old to change. The civil rights movement was largely led by students not their teachers. For Morehouse to continue to lead they must be held accountable to their mission by the students, but the students, as well, must learn that some traditions have their place and it’s easier to change the system from inside than out.

    It would be nice if students and schools did not have to worry about name recognition or “prestige”, but that is exactly what helps students get their foot into some doors and keeps alumni dollars in school pockets.

  15. Ham wrote:

    Maybe more Morehouse Men need to go over to Spelman and get an education in the multiple facets of what it means to be a man, better yet Human from a womanist perspective. The more we keep dividing ourselves, the easier it is for us to remain in a state of stagnation ( a staggered Nation). Black people have an opportunity to lead the charge on innovative ways of addressing the issues that plague us. We should not be utilizing the same tools of cultural warfare to oppress those in our community that we don’t share the same tax bracket with, perspectives or sexuality.

  16. shah8 wrote:

    Hey, don’t look at me, I took classes at Spellman.

    Afro-chan, I think it’s almost a certainty we’ve walked pass each other on occasion. ?:~) With Dumi, it’s a certainty, though I really did mostly keep to the science geeks like Jabu and Quintin.

    Man, we need to get people from different eras of HBCU posting here!

  17. ashlynn wrote:

    @K.lo,

    By second-tier, I mean women who are conditioned to take a backseat to “their men”, as the rampant patriarchy in many HBCU’s goes, not second-tier as in, because I went to a black school the quality of my education is second tier. Not at all.

    Perhaps my post came off as venomous, but there’s not much I can do to assuage that, particularly because I have issues with educational institutions in general. But in regards to the topic, I avoided applying to HBCU’s because diversity is a huge part of who I am, and I felt that the small, open-minded, accepting community I spent so many years building could not be reciprocated at an all-black institution. Though I’m well aware that not everyone shares my preferences in sexual and cultural identity, I felt that I would have a better shot at a school with more physical diversity.

  18. D4peace wrote:

    This article is a melange of passionate but disjointed thoughts. No one institution, pedagogy, or movement can or should define black manhood or completely address the challenges and opportunities that this distinction brings. Morehouse is but one answer to a broader and deeper question of how do we as a country, as a society, and as a culture prepare young black men for success and make sure that they have a platform to utilize their skills.

    It is a troubling indictment that many respondents to this post have made sexual orientation the leading issue when in fact educational, economic, and environmental readiness should be our goal for all students without regard to sexual orientation. If a culture or policy exists at any university that prohibits students from obtaining these goals or discriminates against students based upon sexual orientation then we must speak out.

    HBCU’s have broad shoulders but shouldn’t be tasked with carrying the entire load of righting a long broken secondary education system or bridging the chasm of racial inquities that spans generations. But for HBCU’s willingness to accept and nuture those who nay fall outside of the “talented tenth,” the country would have fewer black men and women in technical professions and leadership positions.

    If students want more of the hands-off autonomy that comes with matriculation at Big State U then they should select that option. But when you choose to be part of the village that we call the HBCU community; you choose to honor the wisdom of the village elders and the rich history and tradition that goes with it. Dear Old Morehouse is far from perfect and is not for every brother. The institution must be encouraged and supported to grow and change in order to effectively meet its mission. Enroll where you choose, but please don’t buy into the plantation thinking that misogyny, criminality, homophobia, and classicism are pathologies relegated to black schools or black people.

  19. bdsista wrote:

    As a graduate of two HBCUs, I am appalled by the disrespect and lack of historical perspective regarding HBCUs. I went to Univ of Michigan and was the ONLY Black in my MAJOR! (1975) I transferred to Tuskegee, graduated and have countless successful friends who are Drs. Lawers, Vets, etc. Tuskegee had remedial programs to address the woeful educational deficiencies of many students who came from rural schools and from urban schools. It was wonderful to see people overcome their challenges and succeed. That is the true purpose of HBCU’s. To take a student with potential and develop it. As an educator (and Attorney) in a middle school and having attended white schools, I can tell you that dress codes and standards of mainstream society MUST be taught to our children of color.

    Baggy pants and Hip hop gear can be worn on your own time, but it has NO place in the classroom. College is a fine place to experiment, but dammnit, if I send my daughter or son to school, I don’t want the college accomodating the latest clothing fad. I want them to get an education and come out be able to compete with their counter parts.

    White schools now accept more Blacks, but I encountered a ton of racism when I got my Masters at University of Maryland, College Park, after having graduated from Tuskegee and Howard and worked for CNN. I enjoyed law school because I knew how to navigate the system. I agree that the homophobia is disturbing, but I also don’t think cross dressing lends itself to an academic environment. That’s what gay clubs are for and parties and your personal life.

    Granted HBCU’s are not perfect and have issues, but the bulk of my friends are from HBCUs. When I need a job or a reference or a hookup, they will tell me. If I want to vacation somewhere, they will tell who has a house on the Vineyard or a timeshare in Hawaii or a house on the beach and offer it to me. My HBCU friends, will take me in, will offer to look after my children when they go to college in their town, will let me know who got promoted, who died, who is in trouble and needs our help, who will be there when I bury my parents as I have been there to help them bury theirs, who have been there for me for over 30+ years. Not my classmates from my white colleges many of whom work for the same school system as I do and have not been in contact with me since the late 1980’s. It is my brothers and sisters from Skegee and HU who many of whom do not know me, but we have the bonds of being alumni that connect us. I met a young woman who is a student now at Howard and we hugged and exchanged numbers. She is no longer a stranger, but my sister.

    That is the difference between white schools and HBCUs. If SC peachprincess thought Spelman was a joke, SHAME on her! I pray my daughter who is Black, Filipino and Japanese gets in because she will be accepted and not be some exotic “other” that has to worry about fitting in the Asian Student group or Black Student Union or be viewed as some interesting thing to f**K by some white student who has No intention of taking her seriously (not that it couldn’t happen at an HBCU) but having taken her to Spelman as a child where she was very graciously received by the students there, I think she will thrive in a place of feminine intelligence. And Yes, Momma has a friend next store at Morehouse’s Medical School who can check on her as well as all my Skegee Veterinary friends in ATL.

    Side note: The Tuskegee Veterinary Alumni organizations accept as members all African American graduates from all Vet schools as well as Whites who graduated from Tuskegee who participate and help support them in their post-docs, help them navigate the career ladder and many other things that are often kept secret from out grads. That is the importance of HBCUs, the network.

  20. MK wrote:

    It never ceases to amaze me how people who never attended HBCUs confidently spew ignorance about the experience.

    I will be the first to admit that HBCUs have matriculation rates ranging between 30-35%. Sadly, Blacks who attend traditionally white colleges and universities don’t graduate at a significantly higher rate (about 40%).

    The question isn’t how we should prepare students who attend HBCUs for the workplace. We should ask why we are failing a majority of black students who want to attend college period.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*