The Fallout From Latino In America

By Special Correspondent Arturo R. García


Note: Video contains one instance of NSFW language

This was noted in last week’s thread over Part 2 of CNN’s Latino In America, but it’s worth a bigger mention: it looks like the network is getting the wrong kind of attention for it, as Latino groups seized on the broadcast to protest CNN’s continued involvement with Lou Dobbs, as reported by the New York Times:

Roberto Lovato, a founding member of Presente.org, a Latino advocacy group, said in a statement, “We won’t allow the network to court us as viewers while, at the same time, they allow Dobbs to spread lies and misinformation about us each night.”

Neither CNN nor Soledad O’Brien, who presented the four-hour series, has offered a public comment on the protests; in fact, according to several stories, the network didn’t even cover them. But even worse for CNN, pro-immigrant attorney Lorena García, one of the few people who were profiled positively in the series told the Times the network clipped her own comments:

She had expected a 15-minute conversation about immigration opposite Joe Arpaio, the sheriff of Maricopa County, Ariz., and a staunch supporter in immigration enforcement, on the prime-time program “Anderson Cooper 360.” During the taped interview Wednesday, she said she made several unprompted comments about Mr. Dobbs.

She said she called Mr. Arpaio and Mr. Dobbs “the two most dangerous men to our communities,” and said that “because of them, our communities are being terrorized in a real way.” She also asserted that CNN was “promoting lies and hate about our community” by broadcasting Mr. Dobbs’s program. The comments were not included when the interview was shown Wednesday night.

“They heavily deleted what I did get to say,” she said.

CNN said the segment in question was tied to “Latino in America.”

“As with all pre-taped interviews, they are edited for time and relevance to the topic of discussion,” a spokeswoman said. “The debate between Isabel Garcia and Joe Arpaio was no exception.”

Of course, CNN’s and Anderson Cooper’s willingness to broadcast a debate between García and Arpaio is also questionable, given the ads featuring Cooper hyping the talk as “extreme.” As I wrote in my reviews, the series’ and/or O’Brien’s inability or unwillingness to place their stories in a larger context on the air, or to acknowledge the disparity between figures like O’Brien and Dobbs and what role they or the network have in the pictures America at large receives of its’ Latino immigrant populations, only weakened whatever good CNN thinks would come out of the series.

Video courtesy of Basta Dobbs

UPDATE: Courtesy of Muslimah Media Watch & The Daily Show, another example of CNN undermining its’ cause:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Moment of Zen – Latino Stereotypes
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis
Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. A Newscaster, Stereotypically, Bumbles her Segway » Sociological Images on 14 Nov 2009 at 11:27 am

    [...] Racialicious. Leave a Comment Tags: media, prejudice/discrimination, race/ethnicity, race/ethnicity: [...]

Comments

  1. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    What the hell, CNN.

    I lost all respect for CNN after 9-11. If you look at CNN’s websites, their highlights are about Jon & Kate, the Balloon Boy, and celebrity sex scandals. Yes, these are VERY important…!

  2. Mary wrote:

    I honestly have no idea why CNN keeps Lou Dobbs around. Are his ratings that spectacular? Because I don’t have the highest opinion of CNN in general, but Dobbs is horrible even by their standards.

  3. Nicole M wrote:

    I think CNN is getting exactly the right kind of attention, finally. They claim to be fair and unbiased, but they interpret that as having some programs catering to extreme right views, and some programs catering to moderate left views. Playing both sides is NOT providing unbiased journalism. And in any direction, their reporting style is a major factor in the dumbing down of the US news consumer.

    Join BastaDobbs and get that hateful hot air off the air.

  4. Lola wrote:

    most of what CNN does is tabloid reporting with the occasional ambulance chasing thrown in for good measure, the don’t do research and they cover the same 5 stories all week

  5. jmn wrote:

    Is it any wonder CNN has slipped to last place in prime time programming in the cable news department?
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114181621

  6. Kaviani wrote:

    About what I expected from them. That’s why I hate CNN.

  7. Whitney wrote:

    “If we reported it, it’s a fact.”

    Riiiight, like if it’s on Wikipedia, it’s a fact.

    I honestly don’t understand how people can respect someone who says those things. He belongs on Fox News with the rest of the idiot hatemongers.

  8. Whitney wrote:

    *ahem* Wait, let me take that back… he doesn’t deserve to be on TV at all.

  9. brownstocking wrote:

    agreed @ Kaviani

    I don’t understand any outrage, I mean, didn’t we discuss the joke that was BIA? Who would think Soledad & Co. would grow professionally?

    I mean, Lou Dobbs is STILL on the air, and Anderson Cooper gets to make bitchy comments about anybody he wants to–this is “news”??

    Only my crush on Don Lemon keeps me interacting with CNN remotely, and that’s mostly through Twitter.

  10. Jess wrote:

    Geraldo on there — oh the irony (given that he works for Fox, which has Beck and Hannity).

    But yes. Dobbs is a real piece of work.

    I think a fundamental problem (it goes to the training reporters get) is that the “two sides” paradigm is good for some issues, but not all, and too many producers apply it as a formula.

    It shows up more in science reporting, where people think there are “two sides” to a debate (like whether evolution is real). That’s like saying there are “two sides” to the theory of gravity, or aether theory vs. relativity. If you don’t understand the relevant material well, then yes, one side looks as good as the other.

    On issues like this, you have a lot of news producers and some editors who don’t delve deeply into this stuff, so they find two opposite numbers, whether or not the issue (in this case immigration/Latinos) lends itself to that.

  11. Danny wrote:

    From the top of my head, I think I can list a number of grievances about CNN, including but not limited to…

    Latino in America
    Black in America
    God’s Warriors
    Anything about China (it could have been better in terms of reporting “as it is” but too many obvious agendas)
    Almost anything about Russia
    When Glenn Beck was on (ok in some pieces of information)
    Lou Dobbs
    Twitter in general
    Most of the anchors when something goes against what is being presented.

    There’s a lot more but then no one is forcing us to watch it. However, it’s hard to denied how much influence it has on others, which in turn does affect us.

  12. CDF wrote:

    lmao@Daily Show…

    From “BiA, BiA” to “You LiA”…

  13. oddrid wrote:

    Wow I really liked that video. It was so well put-together.

  14. Jen wrote:

    Wow. CNN America is obviously a whole different kettle of fish to CNN International. Although, now that I think about it, I do recall times when the international anchors looked somewhat exasperated with some of the “important” stories they had to cross to. There was much eye-rolling when it came to Paris Hilton’s brave walk free from her terrible ten-minute prison ordeal.

    (Confession: for a long time I thought Lou Dobbs was a fictional character. No, really. I thought he was a satirical joke).

  15. Chris Chambers wrote:

    I repeat, if CNN was serious it would have done in depth reporting on the Hispanic community and behavioral issues givign rise to gang rape in Richmond CA. Why don’t you want to talk about that? Lou Dobbs is an easy target, but digging into nagging, terrible issues such as that behavior well, no one wants to face that.

    Mod Note – Chris, why did you ascribe the actions to the participants race, and not their gender? – LDP

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*