The Racialicious Halloween Roundup

By Deputy Editor Thea Lim

Well, it’s almost Halloween.  And every day that we get closer to Halloween, the more our intrepid readers point out for us some of the season’s most ghoulish examples of racism. Sigh.

Reader Joel sent us a link to this Illegal Alien costume being sold by Walgreens and Target (though word on the street is that the costume has been yanked after complaints).

Carleandria sent us this link that shows you how to make your own dreadlocks wig so that you can be crafty and culturally tone-deaf at the same time.

And Brooke sent us a link to her open letter to those who would dress up as Natives on Halloween, (illustrated by a dazzling array of exquisitely racism “Native” Halloween costumes):

but when did the Native American enter the realm of Wizards, Fairies, Super-heroes, Goblins, or Ghouls? When did it become ok to reduce the diversity, language, and culture of nearly 500 different Indigenous tribes into a tacky “costume” of cheap suede, colored feathers, plastic beads, and fringe? Who decided that the history, identity, and lineage of Native Americans could be easily put on and taken off like greasy Halloween face paint?

In fact, it’s become an extremely unenjoyable October Racialicious tradition to post angry articles dissecting the politics of Halloween.  In 2007 Fatemeh wrote “Reasons I Hate Halloween“:

["Orientalist" costumes] reinforce the eroticized and/or dangerous stereotypes associated with Muslim and Middle Eastern men and women. Plus, it’s doubly insulting because (usually) white people will “play dress-up” in these costumes, to supposedly “live like we do” for one night. The only missing detail is: none of the institutional oppression that we face as Muslims and Middle Easterners comes with the costume.

In 2008 I wrote “Take Back the Halloween” (incidentally one of my most commented-upon posts ever, holla!):

So how do people who are often made to feel visually different – you know, like people of colour – experience Halloween?…those of us who are made to feel like we are visually different, or those of us who feel culturally marginalised by mainstream North American culture feel uncomfortable, guilty, angry or just plain sad at Halloween…

People of colour – especially those who grew up or live racially isolated – have a fear of being conspicuous. As much as I like attention, I also devote massive energy to trying to blend in. This effects my personality and how I present myself on a fundamental level. The regular attempt to neutralise your race is a basic part of living as a person of colour in a racist culture…the holiday where you’re supposed to stand out gives me a serious case of the heebiegeebies.


As you can see, Halloween is an exhausting time for us wee anti-racist critics.  When everyone else gets to dress up and have a good time, we wind up at home, either sifting through online images of people dressed up as racists – and growing more bitter and gnarled by the minute – or we try to pretend that it is not Halloween. Usually by drinking.

But wait. I should speak for myself.  I happen to know at least one Racialicious correspondent who is beside herself with excitement about a certain Mad Men themed costume.  And I know of another one who blows all the racists out of the water with an amazing “Dark Captain Morgan” costume.  That’s right. Look to your right.

So you can take Wendi and Arturo’s lead and find a way to enjoy Halloween in spite of the haters.  Or just eat the pain away with chocolate covered marshmallows – you’ll be in good company.

Update:

The subject of one of the tips listed in this post wrote in, saying she wanted to clarify her costume, the second picture in this post. She pointed out that her wig was not intended to imitate anyone’s culture, heritage, or hairstyle, and sent in images of the full costume. The dreadlocks are actually a deep green, not black as they appeared in the picture:

And the full costume was supposed to evoke the idea of a dark fairy.

But the real reason we are posting this update is because the writer seemed to understand the basics of what we were describing in the post: that dressing up as a person of another race or with cultural markers is not ok, and she sought advice on how to convey these sentiments on her craft page. Since the picture was related to a tip, I’ll leave it up, but a better example of what we are talking about looks like this:

-LDP

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Race, ethnicity & culture « logic_and_imagination on 09 Nov 2009 at 1:38 pm

    [...] now I will say that I recommend this website and I’d love to know what you think of the article on Halloween costumes. Because you see, [...]

Comments

  1. Persephone wrote:

    Arturo looks awesome! :D I wanna see him with the hat on, though.

    I have loved halloween and hated the majority of store-bought costumes for years now — but luckily I mostly celebrate at goth clubs, where everyone always goes as a zombie, a pirate, or Sweeney Todd. :D

  2. Jess wrote:

    Am I the only one who thinks the illegal alien outfit is clever?

    I mean, it sort of takes apart the whole “illegal alien” phrase, and the orange Guantanamo jumpsuit to me is just priceless.

    I say this because I think the very term “illegal alien” when referring to other humans is simply stupid. (I remember when I was really little, like 8 years old, and heard Walter Cronkite talk about illegal aliens, and I was so excited b/c I thought extraterrestrials had really landed!)

    So in that sense, I sort of dug it. It underscores that the term “alien” connotes ETs and just how idiotic it is, you know?

    Also, as someone who, because I married an immigrant, has to deal with the USCIS bureaucracy, it was to me, a little joke at their expense kind of thing. (I think the term “alien registration card” is also really stupid).

  3. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    There is the “ARAB BEARD” kit I saw at a Halloween shop, you can see it on my Twitpic:

    http://twitpic.com/l0fpj

    So fucking lame. I don’t see how that’s “Arab,” either.

  4. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    I am just going to dress up as a ghost. I plan to throw a white sheet over myself with 2 large holes for my eyes.

  5. Irene M. wrote:

    As an adult, I feel really bad what I put my mother through. Every October, I’d demand to be an “Indian Princess” and would throw a fit when my mother inevitably put her foot down. I just didn’t get it at the time. In my mind, I was an Indian and my parents already called me “Princess,” going as an “Indian Princess” just seemed like a no-brainer. It finally sunk in sometime around the third grade, but I still feel really bad about it. In my mind, it’s only eclipsed by the time I saw Pocahontas and insisted on singing that Savages song non-stop. :-(

    This year, the fiance and I are going as Leela and Fry. Should be fun.

  6. EMP wrote:

    @ Jess.

    I agree with you. I thought it was clever too.

    Did you notice she/he/it is holding a green card, so technically it is not an illegal alien….

  7. chrissy wrote:

    I wanted to be an “indian” for halloween when I was 7 or 8. My mother, rather than buy some store bought plastic feather headress, helped me research various types of tribal dress and helped me settle on a real representation of what a native american (in this case the hopi) may have worn.

    Did I mention my mom rocks?

  8. Shelby wrote:

    I’ve seen that illegal alien costume before, but the one that caught my attention had a mustache attached to it– which I think was to mark the alien as Latino/Mexican. I dunno, the costume sans mustache strikes me as a bit subversive. But I doubt the average person who actually uses the term “illegal alien” would see this costume as a jab at the dehumanizing nature of the term.

  9. Eva wrote:

    I heard about that “illegal alien” costume yesterday on the morning news. One of the newscasters said, “that REALLY is disgusting.” I agree.

    The sad part is that when POC tell folks that something is offensive to us, we get labeled as “hyper sensitive.” Now I don’t think anything is wrong with being hyper sensitive but when people call me that, it’s like, “the discussion’s over, you’re just TOO sensitive.” That’s usually when I say, “what’s wrong with being too sensitive, I’d rather live with someone too sensitive than not enough.”

    I like the idea of Mad Men themed costumes.

  10. A. wrote:

    Yeah, I can’t really be too terribly pissed off about the Illegal Alien costume, I actually found it rather amusing.

  11. Shelby wrote:

    @Chrissy: I still don’t think it’s cool to wear someone’s culture as a Halloween costume– no matter how “authentic” you make it.

  12. AM wrote:

    I cringe remembering my childhood costumes. I was an “Indian Princess” one year and a “Gypsy Fortuneteller” the next. Of course, I went to a school where our mascot was an Indian, and the costumes featured masks similar to Troll Dolls, so we weren’t exactly up on those kind of issues.

    Incidentally, only myself and the AP US History teacher had anything critical to say when the costumes premiered my junior year. The lone Native American at my school actually was one of the mascots (and insisted on being called Pocahontas by her friends). They finally got rid of them a few years later when my mother (a teacher) mentioned to the superintendent that as the district got more diverse they were a lawsuit waiting to happen. Both she and I have gotten alot more aware since I was running about in fringed and beaded ‘buckskin.’

  13. RCHOUDH wrote:

    Since when did Halloween costumes change from being scary to being offensive?

  14. AnonymousArab wrote:

    I think illegal alien could cut both ways, as a subversive statement about how ridiculous the term sounds sometimes, and as a form cluelessness.

    I can imagine some drunken idiot in such a costume spewing nonsense and faking an accent.

    You look good in that costume, though you really should put on the hat. Come on,where’s big grin and dramatic pose!

  15. Piper wrote:

    I knew I was in for another headache of a Halloween season when yesterday, in Times Square, I stopped in a costume store for a top hat (I’m going as Zatanna one night and Betty Draper the next) and found myself surrounded by a wall of ‘Fu Man Chu ‘Stache’ bags. That’s EXACTLY what they were called.

    Then, when trying to take a picture of said wall for posterity’s sake, I was asked to hurry up, buy, and get out.

  16. elise.anne. wrote:

    Another “illegal alien” costume – perhaps worse than the first, b/c the included fakeombrero.

    http://jezebel.com/5385947/this-halloween-be-a-sexy-racist

  17. malted_tea wrote:

    Ah, the issue that brought my attention to Racialicious in the first place: “costume” dreadlock wigs!

    These things blow my mind to the point where I had to write about it on my site. I tried to be balanced to draw the attention of the folks who were looking for the costume versions while displaying the extremely professional craft and consideration that goes into the making of a true dreadlocks wig for, say, someone suffering from hair loss.

    As I wrote…

    “Not to be a party pooper, but the mere wearing of a costume dreadlock wig can be an insult…because they are often worn to mock Rastafarianism, as part of an costume meant to scare people or generally advance negative stereotypes. Dreadlocks are neither funny or scary and there’s no typical wearer of dreadlocks.

    All that aside, if you’re certain that you still want a ‘dread wig’ for your pirate costume, Star Wars costume, or pimp [costume] then don’t say I didn’t warn you…”

  18. malted_tea wrote:

    And for good measure, there’s About.com who just sent me a link to this page…

    http://beauty.about.com/od/halloweenhair/tp/halloween_hair_makeup.htm

    …where one gallery encourages you to dress like a Geisha and another talks about “scary hair” then presents a lot of highly textured hairstyles.

    Oy vay.

  19. Elton wrote:

    At Hampshire College there was (and probably still is) a tradition of having an annual “Drag Ball,” a dance party where males were supposed to dress as females and vice versa. I thought it was an incredibly stupid and insensitive mockery of gender identity politics as well as quite typical of the obliviously liberal groupthink at Hampshire.

    I suggested on the college’s online forum that we should have a “Race Ball” where we dress up as different racial stereotypes. Completely missing the point and not seeing the parallels, there was quite a bit of backlash to my comment.

    Such was my college experience–lots of arguing, posturing, and hot air with very little learning. I did learn one thing–communities that go out of their way to brag about how non-conformist they are tend to be the most conformist of all.

  20. PPR_Scribe wrote:

    I had to stop one of my daughters from being a “Geisha Girl” this year. She kept showing me the picture she had printed off from some website. I couldn’t figure out even where she got the idea (she’s 9) until she told me that her costume was a “Charlie’s Angel” costume. I had forgotten there is a scene in one of the movies where one of the Angels dresses up this way.

    My husband and I explained to her why she would not be wearing that particular outfit and she simply agreed and got back on-line. In the end she chose to be a boxer and is quite happy with her decision.

    In general, I think the adult costumes in particular are becoming more and more in bad taste—not just the racial themes but the sexual themes as well. When we went to buy our kids’ costumes there were in the costume super store at least 6 separate designs featuring fake exposed penises, breasts or buttocks.

  21. PPR_Scribe wrote:

    BTW, I love Halloween. O/T: A huge issue for me is an increasing number of family and friends who do not celebrate in any way due to religious reasons.

  22. Rest In Peace wrote:

    I’m gonna be Marge Simpson! Yes, my skin is brown, but I already have a blue afro wig. All I need is some red flats, a red necklace, and green cloth I can sew into a tube dress…

  23. Winn wrote:

    For some of us, Halloween (or Samhain, as we prefer) is a religious holiday. The commercialization of every aspect of it, especially in the US, is still disconcerting, and I can’t count how many times I’ve had to correct someone who thought my ceremonial robes were a “cool costume! What are you going as, a Satanist or something?” Not to mention I am in Texas, home of “hell houses” and one of the first proponents of school harvest festivals in lieu of Halloween parties at schools. Halloween is generally an epic fail for both cultural respect and sensitivity and religious respect and parity. But at least we generally get great classic genre films on TV (thank you TCM and IFC!).

  24. Medusa wrote:

    Halloween is my favorite day of the year, but I could really do without the racially insensitive costumes.

    Last year, I was living in Shanghai, and I was with a group of people, one of whom went as a Uighur (they are most well known for having Muslim friendly restaurants so that is the most interaction foreigners usually have with that community.)

    I was pretty offended by his costume choice, but chose not to say anything about it because it was a dinner and I didn’t want to ruin the entire mood of the evening and I was already known as the overly sensitive-to-racism-and-sexism-chick. However, I later told one of our friends from that group how offensive I found it and he didn’t see why. He had gone as a monk and said “is my monk costume offensive?” I don’t necessarily think so (someone tell me if I’m wrong), but to me, “monk” doesn’t necessarily imply a singular ethnicity or culture, and doesn’t seem to be mocking anyone or using someone’s culture as a caricature. I mean, “monk” doesn’t even imply one singular religion as there are monks from various religions. Someone seriously tell me if I’m way off base saying monk isn’t offensive as a costume. But people choose to join monasteries, just like people choose to join the military or join sororities or join football teams, and I don’t think going as a member of these groups is “othering” them.
    Anyway, my friend then asked me “Would you be offended if I had gone as an African shaman?” And I was like “no…but I would be offended if you had gone as an African.” It was like he had a light bulb moment and suddenly saw I why I was offended by the Uighur costume.

  25. Medusa wrote:

    Oh yeah and Arturo your costume is amazing…

  26. Roni wrote:

    The inclusion of the dreadlock craft project on here seems a little harsh, particular in posting the picture of the crafter in question. While an example of the wig, it looks like identifying her, and labeling her a racist, despite not being a public figure.

    She makes some clueless statements, ” Dark” Fairy, “Rasta” Fairy but it’s the context of how the wig is used that’s problematic, not the knowledge how to make one.

  27. SarahNicole wrote:

    There are so many, many creative costume options out there, why do people have to be so damn stupid? It’s come as you aren’t night, and by choosing some of these ideas, one seems to be just coming as on is: an Asshat.

    We were going to go collectively as The Cat in the Hat (13 month as The Cat, parents as Thing 1 and Thing 2), but a) am too damn tired to put it together and b) the baby has yet to care about The Cat in the Hat. So we’re going as An Anthropomorphized Baby Bat and Two Adults Wearing Blue Wigs for No Apparent Reason, Hi Will You Give Us a Drink? A far cry from the year we turned our house into the City of Domes and played the call to Renewal on a continuous loop all night… :-D

  28. Nadra wrote:

    malted_tea, that’s funny about About.com. I write about Race Relations for them and wrote an
    article
    about not going as a Geisha, Native American, Gypsy, etc. At the moment, it’s the most popular article on my site.

  29. Eva wrote:

    @Medusa: “But people choose to join monasteries, just like people choose to join the military or join sororities or join football teams, and I don’t think going as a member of these groups is “othering” them.”

    You hit the nail on the head RIGHT THERE. There is nothing wrong with going as someone that people CHOOSE to be. Like if I go as a boxer, I’m not a boxer in real life, so going as a boxer is something I’m not, or if I go as Betty Draper, well she’s not a real person so I’ll be going as a character.

    However going as someone else’s race is offensive because no one chooses to be the race they are.

  30. Quijotesca wrote:

    Petco was selling dreadlock “rasta” wigs for cats. They’ve taken down their Halloween stuff, but you can still find pics of it if you Google for it. So now this stuff even extends to animals.

  31. Arab-Am POC wrote:

    @Chrissy…I think you comment embodies a huge problem in thinking of what is OK to do. Its not okay for you to go as any indigenous american person no matter how “correct” your costume was to the hopi people…you are creating a characture of the hopi people by wearing “them” as a costume. A few years ago an arab friend of mine went in “sheikh clothing” with a sign that said “need another wife” he thought it was hilarious…I was uncomfortable at the laughs we got from white folks who dont get the joke the same way we do…

  32. Katie wrote:

    I don’t even go out on Halloween anymore. As a woman of East Asian descent who gives a damn about racial stereotyping across the board I find it too painful. Why subject myself to that?

  33. pmsrhino wrote:

    Normally I’m not that big into Halloween. When I was a kid my mom and dad (awesome parents) would make me costumes. I often chose to go as a dinosaur (’Cause dinosaurs RAWK!) for many years until my parents pretty much got tired of the whole thing and stopped doing the trick or treating. And I’m luck enough that any of my friends now a days who would wear costumes like that don’t generally invite me to their parties. But this year should be awesome since the boyfriend and I are going to an anime convention taking place that weekend. I can only imagine all the awesome character costumes that will be there. :D He and I are dressing up as a Reaper from the video game Infamous and Tank Girl (respectively).

    I honestly just don’t see how people can be so uncreative that they have to resort to such stupid, offensive and racist costumes. To me these costumes show not only how insensitive these people are but just how little thought these people put into their costumes.

  34. yolanda wrote:

    i guess if you look at the “illegal alien” costume in terms of, “oh hey–this is an alien not a human, because people can’t be ILLEGAL” it makes sense. but i don’t think most people would get that, and that’s where the idea behind the costume becomes muddled and possibly racist.

    and since we’re talking customes, i am going as an…alien. but with silver body paint, foil, glitter, etc ;D

  35. yolanda wrote:

    also: i cannot wait to see some of the costumes on my culturally sensitive campus (sarcasm)! i am 99.9% there will be some gangsters/rappers/frat dudes in blackface. sigh.

  36. Jess wrote:

    @Shelby – I think it could be a teachable moment kind of thing, tho, kind of the way the movie Coneheads could be.

    (I know that movie has issues but in a lot of ways it reflects the bureaucratic sh-tpile that real immigrants have to go through and shows how silly it is — which is why it’s so exasperating).

  37. Kat wrote:

    This isn’t Halloween, but last weekend I went to the second music festival I’ve been to this year that was crawling with hipsters, and for the second time I saw white people wearing headdresses with neon feathers in them. Has anyone else noticed this WTF trend? I saw several different people per day and went hunting for the vendor, if there was one, but couldn’t find anyone selling them, so maybe people brought their own.

  38. mieko wrote:

    A couple of thoughts-

    I remember one Halloween I was dressed up as a gobin princess. When I knocked on one door for trick-or-treating, an old couple came out and fawned over my “horrible, realistic” black wig. I stood there, embarrased and silent as they touched my real hair- I’d left the wig at home that night.

    And I’ll admit, I went as Pocahontas in 1st grade-I’m part Cherokee, but definitely not Powhattan (side-note: is that racist? Or since I went as the individual cartoon character-with the Disney brand costume- is that a different story-factoring in the problematic-ness of the movie, as well?) …

    Aside from these incedents I looove Halloween! Going as Carmen Sandiego this year! Halloween is totally what you make of it- that’s why it has the potential to be so wonderful and offensive at the same time.

  39. N8iveRadical wrote:

    I’ve got some ideas for combating racist “indian” costumes this year : I’ll either don a “sexy” Columbus costume complete with a bloody sword heh heh, OR just wear a tiara and normal clothes and when people ask, cheerfully inform them that I’m an “Indian Princess”.

  40. Shelby wrote:

    I feel a bit conflicted on the religious-themed costumes. I think that (in the west) monks, “African Shaman,” muslims, jews, etc are racialized/stigmatized enough to where a costume based on them would be pretty insensitive & probably bigoted. I also don’t see religion as being as choice-y of a thing as, say, being a police officer. Might be less of a choice than being born a certain race, but usually the race/ethnicity/region we’re born into has a traditional spirituality that one may or may not chose to participate in– but it’s still a part of their culture.
    But I feel conflicted about this because the nun/priest costumes really don’t strike a nerve with me at all. Probably because Christianity is the privileged religion here (the US) and I believe in the “-ism = prejudice+power” definition of oppression. But I don’t at all think that means Catholics/Christians don’t have a right to really effin hate Christian-based costumes.

  41. oterhog wrote:

    Although some people may interpret the “illegal alien” costume as “clever”, the intention behind it appears to be to make fun of undocumented immigrants. Think about who is going to buy that costume and wear it on Halloween.

  42. malted_tea wrote:

    @Nadra. Nice article. It covers a great deal of the most offensive costumes. Too bad the other About.com editor didn’t “get the memo.”

  43. Katie wrote:

    I get the update, and the intention behind the project, but honestly, it still makes me feel uncomfortable.

  44. BSK wrote:

    I actually have some issue with the pirate-themed costumes we are seeing, and the general way in which pirates have been presented in the media lately. Comparing “commercial” pirates, like Pirates of the Caribbean as fun-loving bands of adventures is completely inaccurate, both for what “piracy” means then and now. And given the ongoing issues surrounding piracy, including the loss of life that is still a consequence of it, and the social, political, and economic conditions that have led to a recent rise in piracy, to doll up the issue as cool and hip, because Johnny Dep donned his pirate costume (complete with dreads) is pretty bad, in my book.

    I’m curious to hear what others think. Many of the historical pirates we celebrate now were murderers and crooks. And many of the modern ones we revile now largely in their situations because of political and social ills. This does not excuse modern piracy or ignore the context of historical piracy, but nonetheless, it seems a bit simplistic to view it the way we do now. Perhaps it’s wrong to really put historical piracy and modern piracy in the same conversation, despite the common language, but it just bothers me to see people flocking to the multiplexes and bars for pirate-themed entertainment, while calling for Somali pirates to be blown out of the water. Thoughts???

  45. jen* wrote:

    ooooh, mieko, the Carmen Sandiego idea is AWESOME!

    Halloween just seems to be an excuse for folks to flex ignorance, and blame any offenses on humorless activists. Thankfully the kids in my neighborhood tend to just stick to cute Disney costumes…

  46. BSK wrote:

    Re: dread wigs… how did/do people feel about all the Manny Ramirez wigs/hats that the Dodgers put out? From what I saw, it was primarily white people (children, mostly) wearing them, but they were doing so because of an individual they revered (solely for his ability to hit a baseball, but nonetheless) and representing a style that became uniquely his in many baseball circles. At the same time, it’s still a white kid in a dread wig/cap cheering on a guy who said kid’s parents would probably roll the windows up if they saw him on the street. Again, thoughts?

  47. charlie wrote:

    Though perhaps clever to some, the illegal alien costume at best pokes fun at the expense of an ethnic group, and at worst contributes to demonizing the targeted population. As both the Nazi & Rwanda/Burundi genocides demonstrate, demonization often precedes violence and worse. So at the very least, the costumes are irresponsible. That’s the word.

  48. Arabi wrote:

    People who keep bringing up the notion that going as a “boxer” or “monk’ is not offensive cause it a choice may want to ponder that all occupations that people enter into by “choice” are centered within a racial and cultural context.
    Also, consider the idea that some people don’t have a “choice” to be a boxer or monk so occupations are not always so neutral and free.
    Also, going as a fictitious creature is culturally bound as well as most spring from the cultural traditions of particular groups of people.

    Also, don’t presume to speak for some “oppressed” people. You don’t know what offends them as if they all agree on what is and isn’t offensive.

    Whats interesting about the “Indian” piece is that Real Natives don’t dress up like that cause what those people are donning or trying to look imitate is not a contemporary cultural-racial group but a historical cultural group that no longer exists and no more represents a true and modern Indian the way a Prussian General or Princess would represent the modern German people.
    Which is why I wouldn’t get insulted if someone decided to dress up like some Ancient African Warrior.
    Of course such a custom will be grossly inaccurate but that is all for the better than if they were to shoot for some impossible “authentic” look.

  49. Bagelsan wrote:

    Re Shelby: I wasn’t sure what kind of monk was meant. A monk could still be a Christian-themed costume…

  50. Bagelsan wrote:

    Also, as a kid I usually went as non-humans (a T-Rex, computer/robot, a horse, etc.) and once I just wore my normal clothes and went as a werewolf-but-it’s-not-a-full-moon-tonight. :D

    Avoiding being a human makes it lots easier not to be offensive (unless dinosaurs were offended. But seriously, I had a giant cardboard head with a jaw that moved when I pulled a string and I “bit” like 50 kids at my school that day, so I don’t see how I could possibly be more respectful of T-Rex culture than that. :p)

  51. Velma wrote:

    I’m going to my first Australian Halloween party, and I am really not excited – the level of cultural cluelessness here can be depressing even at the best of times…

  52. wendi muse wrote:

    hey now, anyone who steals the mad men idea will get reduced to typing duty by yours truly :-)

    Sincerely,

    Joan Holloway

    no, but seriously, i love halloween, and always have. i think it’s the dressing up and fantasy element of it all that makes it amazing and all together my favorite holiday, if you could call it that. it’s unfortunate that some people take it to an offensive extreme, but then again, i think when it comes to dressing up, people feign ignorance and think that in it “all being good fun,” bashing one racial or ethnic group is ok. i personally don’t have a problem with people dressing up in traditional garb of another group, but i don’t speak for everyone who writes here, obviously. i should also note, however, that there is a difference between dressing up as someone of another group and doing it in a way that is clearly ofensive, purposefully hurtful, or ridiculously inaccurate.

  53. Shelby wrote:

    @Bagelsan: Yeah, you’re right. I was just automatically thinking of Buddhist monks.

    @charlie: Good point, I didn’t really think about that. The “clever” wearing of the costume does take a certain risk– one that has a greater effect on immigrant communities than the actual costume-wearer. Hipster-racist-y maybe? Not sure.

  54. Flo wrote:

    and this is why I have convinced my friends to go as all of the winnie the pooh characters….

  55. AfroDandy wrote:

    I blogged about this
    http://afrodandy.blogspot.com/2009/10/halloween-costumes-crafts-and-cultural.html

  56. Yonnie3k wrote:

    Is it insensitive that I don’t find the dreadlock wig offensive? Perhaps if the person was actually dressing up as a Rasta for halloween, I could see the issue. However, like it or not, dreadlocks, or locs, have become a very popular (if not mainstream in some parts like Atlanta or D.C.) hairstyle. To paraphrase Andre 3ooo, not everyone with dreads is down for the cause. So, I’m not sure if I agree with this being lumped together with the Illegal Alien costume.

  57. Kayt wrote:

    I think Halloween is the time of year I am exhausted and generally give up on reminding people not to embrace “Gypsy” stereotypes. Other times of the year I can be outspoken about how the Roma/Romani people are a real, wide-spread, race of people with a shared culture, language and history who continue to suffer persecution to this very day in many countries. It tends to come up because I study ME and Turkish dance and there’s a lot of crazy fantasy stuff being done in the name of “Gypsy Style” that is more “Yee Olde Disney Peasant Who Never Was” than Romani. By October I am tired of reminding people that “Even colorful depictions of ‘Gypsies’ as care-free, back to earth, dancing and music-playing loveables are bad because they negate the complexities of a whole race of people and turn them into fantasy characters who can easily be dismissed.”

    And “Gypsy Fortune Teller”…problematic, veeeery problematic.

  58. Titanis walleri wrote:

    BSK, I think you might be making a mistake in the distinction between historical and modern pirates (and moreso conflating historical pirates with their fictional counterparts).

    Seems like the distinction should be between romanticized fictional pirates and the real thing…

  59. Shauna wrote:

    @rest in peace: don’t worry, she has yellow skin anyways!

    @Elton: every year there’s a house that throws a drag party (not on halloween) where i’m at and men and women dress in drag. would that be offensive? its really fun being in drag for a night, drawing on a beard, and all… i guess it could be seen as making fun of people who wear drag… or as breaking gender norms because its sometimes hard to tell who dressed up and who didn’t.

    @Kat: that’s just a feather wearing trend–as earrings, headbands, etc.

    @BSK: if we’re going to call pirates offensive, then we’re going to have no costumes. “dressing up as a witch ignores the oppression that many women who were accused of being witches went through. often these women broke gender norms and were punished for it by being burned at the stake” please. no.

    suggested rules for costumes:
    don’t dress up as a member of another race or as a type of racial stereotype. if you dress up as a person or non-stereotypical character of another race, do not use “racial markers” (like blackface, eyeliner to indicate ‘asian eyes,’ etc). don’t dress up in a sexist costume. and you’re done.

  60. ashlynn wrote:

    @Kat: OH MY GOODNESS YES. If people wouldn’t mind reading my just out of school writing, I’d like to chime in on that at some point here, or at least see a post on it. But that was a great observation on your part.

    @Wendi Muse,
    I do not believe that the true Miss Holloway would present her memos without any proper capitalization.

    And with that, I totally had this idea first!!! :( hahaha! I might pass given that I feel I cannot do her justice unless I find the right redheaded with, but if I do find one, prepare yourself for a costume-off. :D

    Aaand back to topic, seeing as I haven’t dressed up legitimately in years (though I was always sad when I never had a costume, I would compensate with copious amounts of candy), I honestly hadn’t even made the racial connection. And now that I do, I am certainly going to be squeamish when I see my friend dressed up as Pocahontas (she isn’t white, but still…definitely a sore spot seeing as she always denied me my Native American heritage) and all the kids at her school probably sporting some not-so great costumes. Still, I’d like to try and keep some of the spirit of Halloween as I know it intact.

    And if not, you know, you can find me passed out surrounded by packets of Fun Dip. lol

  61. ping wrote:

    So are they racist against themselves because when they saw Illegal alien they automatically thought Latino?

  62. BSK wrote:

    Titanis-

    Perhaps so, but nonetheless, is it okay to romanticize historical pirates? Is this different than romanticizing slave holders? I know some may scoff at the comparison, but historical pirates were some of the most egregious abusers of human rights in history, and to portray them as cuddly fun-lovers is a tad ridiculous.

  63. Jess wrote:

    BSK — I think you’re getting into stretch territory.

    Yeah, historically pirates weren’t nice people and it’s a lot more complicated than the fun-loving adventurer trope we get from Pirates of the Caribbean. Some, for instance, were government subcontractors, as Francis Drake, others were independent confederations of “free traders” and some were independent ships. Yet others were just ordinary merchants who were violating import/export and tariff laws.

    The “pirate” trope we see most often is really based on Treasure Island. By the time that was written, the “Golden Age” of piracy — roughly 1650-1720– was already more than a century in the past. Plenty of time for romanticized accounts to take over reality (as often happens).

    I honestly don’t think most people draw any connection with modern piracy at all– I haven’t seen anyone dress up as a “Somali Pirate” for instance, and it hasn’t made the costume shop circuit.

    While the phenomenon has entered the American consciousness more or less, it just doesn’t have the currency that say, Islam-inspired terrorism does, or Afghanistan. Simply put, Somali pirates are smash-and-grab thieves, and that isn’t terribly interesting to most people.

    Ask yourself this: did anyone you know mention Somali pirates since the incident a few months ago? It hasn’t been on the news, and even the Fox guys didn’t stay with it long. So in that sense, short media attention spans (as well as short attention spans from the public) mean it isn’t one of those references most people are likely to even get. I mean, if you threw on a machine gun and a set of ragged clothes would anyone figure it out? Doubt it.

    That’s the halloween costume issue. You asked if there is a connection between modern piracy and the early modern type, and I would say that’s like asking if there’s a connection between people shaving coins in the era of Isaac Newton and modern insider trading. Um, sort of, but they are rather different animals.

    Why so? The piracy I referenced above (Drake’s era) was really a function of trading conflicts between rival powers and a huge power vacuum on the seas — there was no way to police a damned thing. (Remember, it took months to cross an ocean and by the time you found out what happened it was over for a year or more).

    That all changed because there was eventually no safe place for pirates to operate. Central governments eventually got better control of the ports, and had better civil servants do the customs house jobs, and got better organized. The cessation of hostilities between the Spanish, English and French also went a long way to ending the problem, as remember, a good chunk of pirates were hired by governments. By the 19th century, certainly, piracy simply ceased to be an issue for most shipping lanes.

    By that time, the only pirates were more similar to what we see in Somalia — small operators who would go after a ship or yacht that looked like there was money aboard. But it should tell you something that the only regions where it is safe for those guys to operate are in SE Asia and Somalia. SE Asia works for them b/c the lanes are hard to patrol — there are loads of places to hide. Somalia because there is no government authority, essentially.

    So, after this long dissertation, no, BSK, while there are broad similarities, the piracy phenomenon of the past was different enough that I wouldn’t put them in the same conversation except to draw out the differences, anymore than I would put the local stick-up guy who knocks over bodegas in the same conversation with groups like Abu Sayyaf or the FARC.

  64. Brandon wrote:

    I actually look forward to Halloween for the intelligent and culturally sensitive commentary I can find online!

    Here’s another nomination for Year’s Worst Costume:

    http://www.allsexycostumes.com/product/CM6049/Sexy_Eskimo_Adult_Costume.html?gclid=CLqa99_b0J0CFcZM5QodL01HsQ

    It’s the sexy Eskimo costume! As one of my friends said: “Mini-skirts are all the rage is sub-zero climates!”

  65. Medusa wrote:

    Mieko-
    a) Carmen San Diego is indeed an awesome costume idea. I’m kinda sad because where I am now, Halloween isn’t celebrated and I haven’t even been here long enough to make friends with whom to celebrate it.

    b) Re: The old people- how humiliating.
    c) I was just thinking about that same thing myself. I think there is a difference between dressing as a specific person who happens to be a different ethnicity from yours (i.e., going as O-ren Ishii even if you’re not a mix of Chinese and Japanese, going as Jasmine even if you’re not from a fictional Middle-Eastern country called Agrabah, or going as the nameless black cheerleader played by Gabrielle Union in Bring it On even if you’re not black. Admittedly, those were really, really weak examples, but I think you get my point), provided that you don’t do something offensive (and futile) to make yourself look like a member of that race, like wearing black face.

    This is getting super-long winded, but the point I’m trying to make is that simply dressing up as a character of a certain ethnicity isn’t offensive. But then what if the character you’re dressing up as is a caricature in and of herself? I mean yes, Pocahontas was a real woman, but I think the Pocahontas that comes to everyone’s mind is the Disney movie stereotype of a Native woman, rather than any kind of knowledge of the actual woman. I just don’t know how to draw the line between actual human/character and caricaturized version of human/character. I know it when I see it, though… Pocahontas is example one. Now that I think about it, Jasmine might be example number two…

    @Shelby-yeah, the dressing up as a priest or nun thing doesn’t seem to be offensive to anyone, which is why I’m having a hard time saying that dressing as another religious figure would be offensive, although I acknowledge that they are part of the dominant culture in the “West.”

  66. Medusa wrote:

    Oh yeah, @ Brandon-
    What the hell? Racial insensitivity aside, that’s not even a costume…it’s just a hooded dress!

  67. m. wrote:

    Though being a shut-in on this particular holiday is really appealing, this post makes me feel a little better. I’m too tired to say anything, yet my anger drives me insane each time I see another shitty feathered head dress walking towards me. I want to hurl. Fuck the haters, though. People of color have every reason to go on with their lives and ignore the rest. My friends and I will just laugh, like we do every year.

    @chrissy:
    You were a child, so I’m not mad at kid-you. But your mom, as great as she may be, doesn’t “rock” for doing that. Guess what? I’m Hopi. (Surprise, one of us reads this blog!) You wore an outsiders’ idea/representation of (one of) my peoples’ TRADITIONAL DRESS as a Halloween COSTUME. Unless you are Hopi, you cannot understand the many meanings behind all the things we wear and why – down to the way we style our hair. So, no; this is no better than someone buying a shitty little suede, fringed, beaded “buckskin” outfit from a costume superstore. In fact, it’s worse. Especially in my eyes.

    No hard feelings,
    The Hopi in very non-traditional dress about to go to school and try and forget that people think her culture is part of an ethnic buffet

  68. Brooke wrote:

    @M-Thank you for committing on Chrissy’s comment, I myself was going to write the same thing! My intention for writing my blog about Native American costumes was to point out that putting someone’s ethnic attire (stereotypical or authentic) in order to emulate their culture is not ok. As a Navajo, I have seen individuals dress up like Navajo’s for Halloween or Thanksgiving, and for some reason they think it is ok. Its not.
    Kudos, M, I know how you feel, and the sacred nature of our indigenous attire is not meant to be worn as a Halloween costume!

  69. pm wrote:

    @BSK and Jess
    As far as traditional pirates go…

    While historically pirates weren’t nice people, I think ‘historically’ nobody was particularly nice. Arguably many historical pirate crews were escaping an extremely brutal and oppressed existence as ordinary sailors.

    National states were of course not true democracies in that era and I think its difficult to make moral judgements about behaviour in such a different time. The ordinary seamen who became pirates were for most of them breaking laws that they had no say in creating in the first place. I believe some were actually ex-slaves. Many pirate vessels were run quite democratically, with elected captains.

    Of course they often murdered other, equally oppressed, sea-farers. The past was just pretty horrible generally, I think.

    The modern Somalian business is also politically complicated, as it relates to the condition of Somalia, a situation the US is heavily involved in. I don’t claim to understand it, but I think there’s more to it than plain criminality. One thing I’ve noticed is that people here have difficulty talking about it seriously without lapsing into ‘arr, Jim lad’ pirate-speak and jokes about parrots and buried treasure.

    Piracy has occured many times in different eras and cultures, and probably every instance has to be considered in its own particular context, with its own specific mix of political and criminal themes, no?

  70. BSK wrote:

    Jess and PM-

    I see what your saying, and can accept that modern piracy and historical piracy are not in the same boat (pun intended). It does get complicated because of the terminology we use around it and because I think some people assume the motivations of modern pirates are the same as historical pirates. In reality, they probably WERE somewhat similar, but people conflate the “treasure hunting” of historical pirates and assume modern pirates are just thugs (or “smash and grab thieves” as Jess called them). As PM pointed out, the modern situation is a large social, political, and economic mess, and many modern pirates justify their actions based on what they perceive as unfair actions taken against Somali waters and as “righting a wrong”. That doesn’t necessarily mean they are right, or justified, but they are certainly more than thugs. But, we’re not here to talk modern piracy, as interesting as it is.

    To the larger point, of romanticizing historical pirates, I guess I just think it’s a bit ridiculous, only because many people probably think the POTC franchise was accurate. It is not as if they are choosing to dress up as something that has a somewhat ugly, but very interesting and complicated past. I’ve seen children’s literature that romanticizes pirate life in a pretty disgusting way, promoting behaviors we’d otherwise find deplorable, but all in the name of “adventure seeking”. Regardless, I still see it as dressing up as a group that one never belonged to and which most people doing the dressing-up probably don’t even understand. I don’t want to draw parallels to other costumes, because that might just get ugly, but I’d still file this under “not so cool”, unless someone is doing an honest representation of an actual historical person.

  71. Taryn wrote:

    to m: thank you.

  72. m. wrote:

    @Brooke:
    Thank YOU for writing that letter. The visuals you provided really aid in pointing out just how ridiculous these people look (aside from straight up racist and stupid), I laughed at some of your captions. I hope it makes the rounds, that some of those who see it and are guilty of these offenses acknowledge their wrongdoing and that those who are planning on doing it? …maybe, just maybe, they’ll think twice.
    And hey, I’m Navajo, as well! I’m thinking that you probably got some sort of vivid mental image of the billions of ways in which a costume modeled after any sort of Hopi traditional dress can go horribly wrong. Us Hopi/Navajo folks bein’ neighbors and all. Let’s hope we run into fewer, if not zero, people attempting to mock or portray (their idea of) us this year!

    @Taryn:
    No problem. We can’t let these things slide, regardless of whether or not it affects us personally, is all.

    A friend and I are going as Edgar and Alan Frog (the Frog brothers, from ‘The Lost Boys’). Since we can’t slay these bloodsuckers with our wooden stakes, if we happen to run into anyone mocking our people…well, that’s what the squirt guns are for. “Truth, justice and the (Native) American way.”

  73. m. wrote:

    Last comment, swear it.

    @Kat:
    LOL @ ‘WTF trend’, and yep – it’s wrong for several reasons, don’t let anyone try to downplay it’s ridiculousness by denying that this is anything other than non-Native people attempting to “indigenize” their wardrobes. These ideas didn’t just come from out of the blue, it IS pseudo-ethnic dress. They also wear fake Indian jewelry (aluminum silver and plastic turquoise) or pawned/antique jewelry (even more messed up) and beaded mock-asins (occasionally Minnetonkas), sometimes other over-the-top additions like feathers in their hair or dream catcher earrings. They get away away with it, no one cares like they did when white people were putting chopsticks in their hair or things like silk mary janes. And let’s be real, here: it isn’t just white people, I’m not treating ‘people of color’ with kid gloves (everyone can be racist). I see the streets crawling with Asian and Black people doing it, as well; if I had a penny for every Asian girl I saw dressed like this I’d be buying explosives to blow up an Urban Outfitters. Of course, no one calls any of this innocent ‘trend’ out for what it is: a tacky form of mockery, dress-up/escapism for settlers.
    Most importantly, though, is the fact that it’s incredibly costume-y and obvious, but none of this racially ‘marks’ them the way a Native woman in something as simple as jeans, a t-shirt and squash blossom earrings would. Must be nice.

  74. BSK wrote:

    M-

    To jump on your point to Chrissy, which I think was very salient, would you feel the same way if someone dressed as a particular Hopi individual and did so accurately? In general, is it wrong for someone to dress “cross-racially” if being an actual individual? What if it’s a fictional character? Is it ever possible to do so respectfully? I’m not being a devil’s advocate, mind you… I’m genuinely curious.

  75. AnonymousArab wrote:

    See occasionally there’s some mention of samurai in these discussions, but this makes me somewhat uncomfortable, since samurai to me are a historical noble class (unless I’m missing some context here). Of course going in yellow-face or doing the abominable thing of taping one’s eyes is extremely out of line. However, I don’t see dressing as one as being substantially different from dressing as an European knight.

    After all are ninjas also in poor taste? This is particularly pertinent to me since I’ve had a bit of an obsession with ninjas since childhood. I learned to use nunchaku properly and under supervision when I was eight, and I’ve learned various styles of martial art over the years, Okinawan/Japanese, and Korean mainly. (No Chinese or SE Asian styles) I’m not much for costumes, but it seems to me to be a form of athletic gear more than anything. (These days- actual ninjas, whether or not they ever historically existed as part of a unified discipline, were probably more than just athletic)

  76. DivergentDana wrote:

    “I don’t even go out on Halloween anymore. As a woman of East Asian descent who gives a damn about racial stereotyping across the board I find it too painful.”

    I was thinking about going to a Halloween party, but nixed the idea when I realized that people will invariably get the bright idea to go as President Obama – in blackface… but then, I had to consider the prospect of not going to Halloween parties for the next 4 years.

  77. Jen wrote:

    @m Why was Chrissy’s costume worse than ‘a shitty little suede, fringed, beaded “buckskin” outfit from a costume superstore’? I’m not disagreeing on the don’t-wear-someone-else’s-traditional-dress-as-a-costume front, just curious as to why one with some thought put into it is worse than an insta-costume?

    Anyways, I’m going as Leela from Futurama. I sincerely hope next weekend is not the chosen date for the Cyclops invasion of Planet earth.

  78. mieko wrote:

    @AnonymousArab: It goes along the same lines as pirates, I think. Ninjas are like mercenaries really. They were samurais who gave up their code of honor to assassinate. They’ve just been romanticized, similarly to pirates. I’m not uncomfortable with either of them, personally.

    @Shelby: I don’t have a problem with monk or nun outfits, but I DO have a bit of a problem with “sexy nun” outfits, and a HUGE problem with “child-molester-priest” outfits. I’m Catholic, btw.

  79. anon wrote:

    The “dread” wig pisses me off. As a black woman with locked hair, I see it as way for white people to “rage against the machine” at the expense of my people’s cultures across the board. My hair was originally locked when I was really young and it tied in with my family’s predominant religious and cultural beliefs which is Ifa, though there are many versions by different names such as Candomble, Lukumi, Umbanda Obeah and or Santeria. They all fall under the same umbrella(Itan), so I don’t tend to make huge differences between them. My granpapa was Gullah and practiced Ifa, as did his parents before him, and so on. He taught us that the grooming and styles of hair within our beliefs and culture were sacred, especially to Mama Osun(Oshun, Oxum, Ochun). Locked hair was one of the many styles, so yes, it vexes me to see these costume “dread” wigs, and white people in general with “dreads” whether real or fake. Sorry, but that’s just how I feel.

  80. GüeraLola wrote:

    @ anon you don’t have to apologize. You every right to be offended since it is your religion and part of your culture that those wigs are mockery of it.

    I was at a Halloween store a couple weeks back and let me sat this. I LOVE Halloween the one day I get candy, scary stuff and have a right to be morbid and creative But my dad put his foot down when I was ten said I wanted to be a suffragette . (he wants to stay was from controversy last year I was an alcoholic housewife (inspired my Betty draper, even though she wasn’t a alcoholic) Nice poklkdot dress pearls, and hip flask. Maybe where I live but the racist costumes tend to be small minority (pun unintended) but I have seen my list of offensive something but were not P.C, sexist. One “costume” I heard about in my school came as the Halloween rapist. No joke. That just pissed me off . I recall after reading an article like this two years ago, I went to Halloween celebration in my school and saw a classmate(she was Chinese) dressed as a Geisha dressed in a real kimono. How one react to that? a couple a kids (who were Muslim) came dressed as suicide bombers. I wondering were mocking their stereotype or some else or baby it was and F— you to people who think all Muslims and Middle Easterners are terrorist.
    On a lighter side, think this year I’m either coming was a beauty queen or zombie. bride.

  81. Brooke wrote:

    @Jen
    Even though Crissy researched and put some “thought” into the outfit, its use is for the same purpose as the cheap suede costume-it is for Halloween. Its use is not for ceremonial dances or celebrations, but for a Halloween party or trick-or-treating. Crissy is “pretending” to be Hopi, and no matter how accurate her costume is a person’s identity/ethnicity is made up more than just wearing a “costume”. In that respect, when she is pretending to be Hopi, what does tha mean? Do Hopi’s do the War-woop? Do Hopi’s hunt the buffalo and say “How”. When we put on a Halloween costume we usually take upon that characters mannerisms and personality. So what is the personality or mannerisms of a whole groups of Hopi people, what language do they speak? Crissy will not know this, because she is not Hopi. Whatever she acts like during that period will be based on whatever stereotype she knows of Native Americans as a whole. Even IF she did her research, it still doesn’t matter, she is not Hopi, and no matter how much she tries to pretend a individuals culture is not a costume one can take on and off.

  82. AnonymousArab wrote:

    @Guerra Lola

    The Muslims dressed as suicide bombers is definitely a “fuck you” to the stereotype. There are a number of t-shirts very much in the same spirit:

    http://www.hijabman.com/store

    (I’m do not profit from the enterprise linked)

    I myself made my own t-shirt at home that read in Arabic “I hate your freedoms”.

    The point wasn’t that I actually hate freedom, but to poke fun at how I got splashed when other people started painting with a broad brush.

  83. Jen wrote:

    @Brooke I think you misread my question – I wasn’t asking WHY going as a Hopi was bad, I know the answer to that, I was asking M why she thought a “researched” costume was WORSE than a ready-made one.

  84. anon wrote:

    Jen, if I may offer my perception: I think the concept of dressing up as a real group of people with a distinct culture is just offensive. I think that if a person wears a cheap, and non accurate imitation, it’s annoying, but you can at least take a bit of solace in the fact that it is exactly what it is…someone doing a bad job of generally imitating your culture. If it is accurate, then I think that would burn me up worse because it’s like: Wow you took all that time to research this, and the thought never crossed your mind that this was inapropriate to wear in the first place? I kinda see it as, “Damn, we can’t have shit!!!”, when I spot these cultural tourists. There are sooooo many different complex feelings about this, and they are generally hard(for me) to put into words This is just my take, but I do not speak for M. Thanks.

  85. GüeraLola wrote:

    @ AnonymousArab thanks for the website! I’m getting “My name causes national security alerts. What does yours do?” T-shirt for my dad. (don’t ask)

  86. Jen wrote:

    @anon Cheers, that makes sense. I just figured they would be at equal levels of offensiveness, one for being lazy, the other for being faux-authentic.

  87. m. wrote:

    @ Jen:
    I should have typed ‘I FEEL THAT it’s worse’ – my original comment wasn’t very clear seeing as how this is a pretty contentious opinion. And actually, they ARE “equal evils”, except for one difference: the beaded-and-feathered plastic-baggied garbage is just that, and the traditional dress actually means something.
    Anyone can do this and get it in their head that they are better than the average ‘Halloween Indian’. After all, EVERYONE ELSE wore a store-bought or stereotyped costume while THEY “put some thought into it”. But how does one “put some thought into it”, how do they “make an effort” when my people thought of it in the first place (years before anyone arrived in our homeland to ‘observe’ and copy us) and the “effort” is made for their own entertainment??
    If someone wore even the most carefully constructed costume, their “effort” means nothing if it is based on what a man wears for a buffalo dance. It’s flippant misappropriation; very disrespectful to not only my family and I, but also a slap in the face to all Indigenous people, “You will share your culture with us whether you like it or not, and we will take anything we want while giving nothing in return.”
    The last time I wore traditional dress was for a social dance, or else I have dressed for ceremonials. I don’t go out trick-or-treating or to parties dressed like I am ready for ceremony! The attire is not for me to parade down the street in on a holiday that so many spend mocking Indigenous peoples (Pacific cultures get their fair share of this for sure) – so it certainly isn’t for an outsider to replicate and wear, at any time or place.

    (Sorry about the length, I have an issue with typing in great depth. I really like your idea to go as Leela, very cute and original! It’s disappointing that such a great show was canceled…)

  88. m. wrote:

    (I really have to clarify that by “social dance” I mean a non-ceremonial, or dance that isn’t sacred and kept private. I don’t want people to think I contradicted my own beliefs and dressed traditional to go out clubbing – lololol.)

    @BSK:
    It all depends on the who/what/why/how. Even if it’s a fictional character and a great costume, stereotyped additions would make it offensive and the individual needs to be aware of their affectations.
    I do not think a lot of people could pull off dressing as a specific Hopi (or Navajo or Tewa or…) individual convincingly or do it in a respectful way. It requires more than just reverence, but also knowledge, consent, familiarity and a level playing field. To dress as someone means you are somehow familiar with who they are as a person (or would if they are a fictional character). Who an individual Hopi is as a person is partly determined by their relationship to the culture, which is what makes us a people. We’re very private and have strict protocols, and so most outsiders with no connection to any Hopis (friends, loved ones, etc.) do not understand or know us *as a people*, so they’re not going to understand us very well on an individual basis, either.
    Something like two friends, one Hopi and one not, going as each other for Halloween is fine. If a Navajo dressed up as Diane Humetewa, I’d probably die laughing. (OMG. That was totally me coming up with the greatest idea/my costume for next Halloween on a whim!!!) But if the person doing it is someone who is as mentally/emotionally/spiritually distant to the Hopi people as we are to them, I do not think it can be pulled off with much success.

    (…says the brown girl whose costume this year is based on a white boy.)

  89. m. wrote:

    *** …based on a CHARACTER that’s a white boy. UGH, sorry. I’m not going in white face or anything. No more typing when I first wake up.

  90. pm wrote:

    @AnonymousArab

    I rather like those T-shirts. But surprised there’s no “Don’t panic, I’m Islamic”.

  91. BSK wrote:

    M-

    Thanks for the info. I think you are right, that there is no clear answer. Your information specifically regarding the Hopi is interesting, but I think we want to be careful to not assume that the Hopi are set apart from other races/cultures/ethnicities. I am not familiar with any, but I would guess that there are some notable Hopi individuals who are notable for something that has nothing to do with their being Hopi. I’m open to hearing I’m wrong on this, but I’d guess this true of any group.

    I do think there is somewhat of a scale. A white kid dressing up as Lando Calrissian (of Star Wars)? I’d be fine with that, assuming there is no black face involved. A white kid dressing up as Michael Jordan? Again, I wouldn’t have an issue. A white kid dressing up as MLK or Obama? Hmmm, I think things start to get dicey here. A white kid dressing up as Malcolm X? That would be a lot harder. (All of this continues the assumption of no black face and other like ridiculousnesses)

    You made a point about “stereotyped additions”, and I think this also depends on “what” and on “who”. For instance, if someone is dressing up as Manny Ramirez, would adding dreads be wrong? I’d say no, given that he has them. Would adding a feathered headdress to a costume of an NA? It would depend, on whether the individual being represented ever actually wore one.

  92. sandeep wrote:

    interesting. i had an… interesting halloween experience in 2003. freshman at the Ohio State University meant I was dragged out to the OU halloween party, a massive city-wide drunk-fest, where folk dress in costume and get pissed, New Orleans-Mardi Gras style ‘cept out in the Midwest. So back then I had long hair, a putka, which is akin to the turban, as a kid in a predominantly-Sikh family. Whilst I’d raised protests to the outward sign of faith that more or less was a personal lie, i was strongarmed into keeping the hair intact by my folks. (don’t worry, that didn’t last, fast forward 6 years and we’ve since reconciled over my long-since shorn hair, heh)

    But back to the story, walking the streets, semi-blasted myself, with my gargantuan local friend and former Highschool classmate, and folk’d glance me, drunk themselves, and decry “Osama!” Now… more or less these guys got a bit of a break, given that it was Halloween… I was cautioned to give them some space, as my first gut instinct was to sock the guy in the face, but i was held back by said gargantuan friend… this happened a couple times in the night…

    long story short, i had just gone out without a costume, none of us in our group had one, as we’d just impromptu driven to the town for the drinks, and had no idea there’d be a city-wide street-side Halloween party boozefest. All in all the crawl was pleasant, hardly anyone bothered me really, but the thing is… essentially I’d been taken for a halloween costume… my parental-encourage religious garb, sign of faith, had been reduced to a pop-culture reference of extremely offending nature… lovely.

  93. Mieko wrote:

    I’m afraid I’m opening a whole can of worms here, but- if wearing religious and cultural costumes for Halloween is appropriation, why is it OK for monk or nun costumes to exist? Yes, Christianity is the religion in-power in the States, but Catholicism in itself is not, and is mostly followed by POCs (don’t quote me, but I think it’s somewhere around 60%). Am I, as a Catholic, justified if I were to be offended by people appropriating my culture and religion through movies and cheap costumes?

  94. RCHOUDH wrote:

    @ Mieko

    I believe you have every right to be offended by someone dressing up in a Christian specific religious outfit, especially if that outfit looked offensive (like those “sexy nun” costumes).

  95. cabezadc wrote:

    Interesting thread…some great things to think about. My two comments: the illegal alien costume was just plain dumb and in bad taste…what were these retailers thinking?

    As an African American older woman, I want to tell you that people dressed up in white sheets with the eyes cut out….really IS scary.

  96. Barbara wrote:

    For their very first Halloween ever, my Ethiopian kids, ages 9, 11, and 11 yrs, dressed as Superman, Wonder Woman, and a Jedi Knight. I wondered about the lack of Black superheros, and the invisibility of women with real Power. But what they saw was powerful and good fighters against evil. They knew they could embody that.

    I always approach this holy day with trepidation, as it is not truly for me about candy and scary things; it is about honoring our dead ancestors. I encourage my kids to dress as a character they admire. I use the discussion about “who to be” as an opportunity to discuss all the isms… and the true definitions of good and beautiful as opposed to the dominant culture’s definitions.

  97. ruby w. lee wrote:

    Let us go and get donations for UNCEF/ United
    Nations chidrens fund like we did in 1955;

    My god child dressed up lie Zorro in 1980′
    watch Tales from the cript Black Dracula 1930’s
    Frakinstine The Franikstin with madaline Kahn

    Alfred Hithcock andand the Blog have fun

  98. brownstocking wrote:

    So, I’m confused about all the Mad Men costume love. Can those who are going as main characters of an admittedly (intentionally?) racist/sexist/otherist depicted show (Racialicious covered this a few times, I know) tell me why? I truly want to know and don’t understand.

    I am going as a commando, actually. A womanist commando.

    As a Christian in a sorority, yes, I do get offended by nun and priest costumes, as well as the sorority and fraternity costumes, because they all tend to play to the negative stereotypes. But that’s just me, and Lord knows I’ve donned my share of insensitive costumes.

  99. Momofthree wrote:

    We don’t celebrate Halloween. I find it offensive that even though we have no problem with others celebrating it, we are ostracized because we don’t.

    If we have to accept everyone and everything, then what is the big idea about simply not celebrating?