Blackface, and the Violence of Revulsion

by Guest Contributor Minh-ha, originally published at Threadbared

This post is supposed to be about the latest occurrences of blackface in fashion — specifically, the 14-page editorial featuring Lara Stone, a white Dutch model, painted black and shot by Steven Klein for the October 2009 issue of French Vogue and also Carlos Diez’s show at Madrid Fashion Week (September 22, 2009) in which models walked in blackface and, at times, with bared breasts.

There is indeed quite a lot to say about both events. To begin, fashion’s seeming ineptness for dealing with race in ways that do not accommodate and/or supplement the already too long histories of racial objectification and commodification. We’ve discussed much of this history on Threadbared (see especially here, here, here, here, and here) already and will no doubt continue to, as there seems to be an inexhaustible amount of material. Second, these events (and others like it) are revealing of the ways in which multiculturalism and multiracialism –under the guise of postracialism, postmodernism, or just artistic edginess– enables the continuation of white supremacy. For example, some are defending French Vogue for its provocativeness (”creative images . . . can sometimes [be] off-putting”) and for its postracialism (arguing that it is “sort of beautiful in that having a person of one ethnic background look convincingly like she might be of another race shows the interconnectedness of us all”). But what is on display in French Vogue and on Diez’s runway is not beautiful black bodies, but what Nirmal Puwar describes as “the universal empty point” that white female bodies are able to occupy precisely because their bodies are racially unmarked: “[Thus] they can play with the assigned particularity of ethnicized dress without suffering the ‘violence of revulsion.’”

The “violence of revulsion” that women of color generally, and black women particularly in the cases of this issue of French Vogue and Diez’s show, experience is not mediated by postracialism. In fact, the violence of revulsion is redoubled here. Blackface highlights the privileged universal empty point that white bodies continue to occupy even in this so-called postracial moment, and in so doing, it positions racial difference against whiteness, as the other to whiteness. Moreover, blackface and other performances of racial commodification produce a different kind of “violence of revulsion” — an everyday violence of revulsion like I experienced when I discovered Klein’s editorial and Diez’s fashion show.

By this second order of “violence of revulsion,” I mean the assault of racism and the assault of colonialism’s traces on what was for me, until that moment of violence, a relatively mundane workday at home. Violently interrupting this scene of banality is not simply these images of racial arrogance, but my own visceral response of anger, exasperation, disappointment, and a feeling I can only describe as racism fatigue. Such images and their inevitable postmodern, postracial, freedom-of-artistic-expression discourses and apologists are not only tired, today they are tiring.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Vogue and Blackface « Feminist Looking Glass on 15 Oct 2009 at 12:10 pm

    [...] with diversity. Of course they can’t hire black models for these shoots. As one commenter on Racialicious says, You guys didn’t get the memo? Your dark skin looks even better on white women than it does [...]

  2. Colourface Epidemic Infects ANTM | Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 29 Oct 2009 at 12:35 pm

    [...] also visit any of the growing number of posts we’ve put up recently dealing with blackface: Blackface and the Violence of Revulsion Convo about Blackface on Episode 121 of Addicted to [...]

  3. Cheerleader Blackface: The Cultural Function of Pretend Shock | Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 03 Nov 2009 at 1:56 pm

    [...] fatigue, I haz it.  Who here is tired of reading about blackface? Because I sure am tired of writing about it. And at this point I don’t know what more there [...]

Comments

  1. Nelle wrote:

    I DON’T GET IT!!

    This has nothing to do fashion and those who make the chocies to do this are likely not even a black person( or other race) on site to say” umm I think we need to rethink this concept”

    And if there was that person would lose their job anyway.

    There is no arguing that this is not racist.

  2. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist wrote:

    I don’t get it, either.

  3. kahlilg wrote:

    Their have been times where Lara has been in blackface in Vogue Paris and it has disturbed me quite a bit. (In the Feburary 2009 edition of Vogue Paris there is an editorial with her in blackface with a tribe in Africa.) In this editorial however, I thought the message was more about the exotification white women find themselves being forced to go though, like tanning and big lips, but still retaining a sense of whiteness. There were also pictures of Lara in white caked on make up and I thought it represented age when old white women try to look as fair as possible.

    Lara is the biggest model on the scene, literally. She varies from a size 4 to a size 6 says nymag and recently Lara has made the comment that she hates being “the fat girl.” I think Lara being white and having her Bridget Bardot looks makes it easier for her to be big in a sizist industry, but I also think Lara hates being “the fat girl” because of all the exotification she’s facing. Someone made the point in another site I frequent that if she lost weight she would just be another model, and I think that’s exactly what she wants. Or at least she wants the security to know that people like her because of her, not because they remind her of Bridget Bardot, which I think is a problem considering how racist and sexist she is, or her size. It may sound weird but I think Lara is facing what black models in the industry are facing. And she hates it.

  4. Thea wrote:

    This is great:

    “Second, these events (and others like it) are revealing of the ways in which multiculturalism and multiracialism –under the guise of postracialism, postmodernism, or just artistic edginess– enables the continuation of white supremacy. For example, some are defending French Vogue for its provocativeness (”creative images . . . can sometimes [be] off-putting”) and for its postracialism (arguing that it is “sort of beautiful in that having a person of one ethnic background look convincingly like she might be of another race shows the interconnectedness of us all”).”

    So true. Time and again and we are reminded that racism isn’t over, it’s just found new sneaky forms through which to perpetuate itself.

    Also, that comment about the “interconnectedness of us all” makes me want to yak.

  5. cocolamala wrote:

    “It may sound weird but I think Lara is facing what black models in the industry are facing.”

    this comparision does not ring true…black models in the industry are facing unemployment — and models like Lara are being hired to superficially represent blackness.

  6. atlasien wrote:

    @kahlilg Yes, that conclusion seems really flawed. Black models absolutely do not face the same thing… they face a lot worse. They either face racism by itself, or as an added bonus, they could face racism PLUS sizism. “Black” and “larger than size 0″ are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

    And can I add, in a note of horror, that that model is a size 4 or 6 and she’s considered “fat”? Damn… the average clothing size for women in the US is 12-14.

  7. kahlilg wrote:

    @cocolamala-
    true. that wasn’t what i meant though. black models, when they do get work, are being exotified and used for nothing else but their skin color. right now there does not seems to be very little distinction between black models and in editorials and runway they seem to be interchangable. with lara she’s has very little indivuality as well. she keeps being compared to bridget bardot and personally I don’t think she likes it. if a black model got the ed in feburary 2009 issue like I mentioned it wouldn’t make it any better.

  8. Eva wrote:

    Is this supposed to be easier than say, hiring black models?

    Stupid magazine.

  9. honeybrown1976 wrote:

    So, instead of hiring a black woman, they represent blackness with a white one.

    Seriously, what is behind the madness of some whites?

  10. Celeste wrote:

    You guys didn’t get the memo? Your dark skin looks even better on white women than it does on you so of course we painted a white lady!

  11. cocolamala wrote:

    “true. that wasn’t what i meant though”

    i hear you kahlilg, i agree that individuality and identity can get lost when you are seen as belonging to a niche category like being a bigger model or being a black model. that is a problem for both of them. there are definitely changes that need to happen all around in the modelling industry.

    however Lara’s spot in this blackface issue is not because of her size, but points directly to racist industry practices that allow editors to avoid/stigmatize/marginalize black models.

  12. kahlilg wrote:

    @cocolamala and this I totally understand and agree with.

  13. Black Narcissus wrote:

    @cocolamala

    lol…that was wicked funny. And oh so true.

  14. CKR wrote:

    What really got me about these pictures were some people’s reaction to it. On another site I go on (a celebrity one) many people were “explaining” that it wasn’t blackface at all-lol. They’re reasoning for this was because she didn’t have ruby red painted lips and wasn’t eating chicken or some other outlandish stereotype for black people….??? Can you believe that? Reasoning like that is exactly why FAILS like these pictures are able to continue; b/c a significant amount of people still JUST DON’T GET IT.
    These pictures are blackface.

  15. Eh wrote:

    Maybe I am being paranoid, but this just comes across as a big ‘FU’ to people who complained about the lack of diversity on the runway. ‘You want black faces, I’ll give you black faces!”

  16. Kaonashi wrote:

    In most of the discussions I’ve seen about this online people generally are disgusted with antics like this and the fashion world in general.

    Between this, Ralph Lauren firing his “face of Ralph Lauren” because her photoshopped waist in one of his ads brought on a shitstorm of criticism, and Louboutin making Mattel recast the Barbie molds for his special edition dolls “because the feet were too big” people are getting fed up with BS like this.

  17. Phil Deeze wrote:

    @ Celeste:
    Say word!

  18. Crystal wrote:

    I’m sitting here, confused. Celeste at #10 was good for a chuckle, ha, that black skin looks even better on white models. But seriously, the only conclusion I can draw is that Black people’s suffering still doesn’t matter. Blackface is hurtful, and they know it, and their excuses amount to “Your suffering is not as important as our [fucking dubious] artistic expression.”

  19. lm wrote:

    @Eva –

    Not necessarily easier, but I do think what the magazine is saying (through their actions) that they’d rather hire a white model and paint her black than hire a black one.

  20. ashlynn wrote:

    That second photo is absolutely revolting. I love how our skin colors are edgy, our full lips are edgy, our full breasts are edgy, our hair texture is edgy, but we as a whole, are not.

  21. ashlynn wrote:

    And to add to thatlet me just say that there should be quotes around “edgy”, because in my neck of the woods, fashion’s version of “edgy” is just exploitation, appropriation, and gross misrepresentation.

  22. mosaic wrote:

    People of African descent are REALLY tired of being nice about such rude & offensive behavior. White people always wonder why certain blacks have a problem with them…well…HERE’S A GREAT REASON WHY!

    After all the years of hatred, death, murder, rape, degradation, free labor, seperation and millions of other horrific actions….WHHHY would white people CONTINUE to do such things?!?!? Absolutly unacceptable. I am one black person that is COMPLETELY sick of the bullsh*t! There are NO MORE EXCUSES….WORLDWIDE! I’m tired of the “oh…we weren’t trying to offend anyone…we were just having fun…” or “well…it has nothing to do with race…it’s an artistic expression…”
    Are you freakin kidding me?!?! As they say in NYC..”Get da F*** OUTTA HERE!!!”

  23. LuLu wrote:

    @EH: funny. I hadn’t thought about it that way.

    Picking up on Crystal: I am all for artistic expression. However, is Vogue stepping up to the plate of just what is being expressed here? It is one thing to deal with these issues visually in art. HOWEVER, it is another issue completely to actually play this out on a model’s body — a body that is translated through a long process that is deeply embedded in capitalism and shows up off the runway and innocuously in department stores across the nation. While I am not suggesting that we will walk into Belks and see a Black Faced model, I am inquiring into the implications of an industry that relies on a narrative that relies on the theme of “you want to be me, wear these clothes, and look like this.”

  24. RCHOUDH wrote:

    This is appalling and I’m continually awestruck at Western fashion’s blatant use of racism in order to come off as “edgy” and “sophisticated”…and yeah everything about POC’s comes across as looking better on whites than on non whites. White women with full lips (Jolie) and round butts (Kardashian) are looked upon as the epitome of human beauty whereas black women with these same features are dissected and analyzed with some sort of creepy fascination by white people.
    I’m surprised they haven’t gones towards having white models acquire “Asian eyes” in order to look more exotic (but I guess they can just hire some Asian models for that effect).

  25. Tsk. wrote:

    I think they really missed a trick with this idea for an editorial, actually. It would have been both intriguing and sort of tongue-in-cheek if they’d also had, say, Chanel Iman painted to look like a white woman. The inevitable yawnfest of making the “blackface” character dress in an “exotic” way – complete with head-dresses and warrior-princess stance – could have been humorously offset by the inclusion of a black model styled to play up to all the stereotypes of a preppy white blonde woman.

  26. Jen wrote:

    @Tsk I think it’s meant to have a medieval/Byzantine sort of bent, what with the plague mask and the Black Madonna (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Madonna)reference (which is what I think the shot featured here is meant to be). The Black Madonna statues take their hue from the wood they’re made from or soot. They have European features, too.

    Which leads me to a question – if the model were actually painted black (as in, the colour that is an absence of colour) rather than the faux-brown-person dip she’s been given, would that change things?

    It just feels lazy and shit on a variety of levels, really, ranging from the racist to the pretentious to the “we didn’t really do our homework at all”. I almost wonder if the blackface was done to enrage on purpose, you know?

  27. dersk wrote:

    Put it this way: there’s absolutely room for photographic art that explores the meaning and context of blackface in a respectful way.

    And it’s not Vogue. I mean, they (and the entire fashion industries) treats women as interchangeable fleshbots, so why should they treat women of color any differently?

    @atlasien: I can attest that Dutch women tend to be *much* thinner than American women. Men, too. Although they have been getting fatter in the 15 years I’ve lived here. As well as being the tallest folks in the world, they also have no hips, which is pretty annoying.

  28. Irene M. wrote:

    First, let me say that I loved the clothes and ambiance of the Vogue editorial. It was a beautiful spread fitting a fashion magazine from what’s considered one of the most fashionable countries. I even think that the clothes look better with darker skin than with Lara Stone’s white skin.

    Then why on Earth didn’t they just hire a black model?! Seriously, they could have had their gorgeous photos without being racist turds. From what I hear, French Vogue didn’t have a single model of color in their entire magazine. When they needed someone with dark skin, they just put some white model in blackface. It’s just mind blowing. What I imagine happened, is that the editor realized that they needed a black model, but that neither Channel Iman or Jourdan Dunn had the face they were looking for. They could have picked another model, but heaven forbid there be multiple successful black models.

  29. Kat wrote:

    Vogue is desperate and they’re looking for sales.
    And for those designers to refer to any of their clothes as African-inspired is a joke.

  30. Digital Coyote wrote:

    *head. desk*

    And why OH WAI is the gal in the second pic showing her mosquito bites? Pig Pen was never sexy! “Couture” does not change this fact.

  31. Joy wrote:

    True WTF moment.

  32. 123 wrote:

    I wonder if some people would be just as quick as to dismiss this if the roles were reverse; i.e. ethnic minorities were getting 98% of modeling jobs, and instead of hiring white model for a fashion spread, PoC model was just painted white.

  33. Jen wrote:

    @123 But they aren’t and they didn’t and you’re talking about a total alternate universe. You may as well imagine a world in which Nigeria colonised America and imported slaves from Britain. How, exactly, does that add anything to a discussion about blackface in Vogue?

  34. Feminist Review wrote:

    cocolamala wrote: black models in the industry are facing unemployment — and models like Lara are being hired to superficially represent blackness.

    This!

  35. Queenb727 wrote:

    @Digital Coyote

    Misquito bites? So now we’re making fun of women for having small breasts? Honestly, on a post about unhealth beauty standards this type of thing can stand to be left out.

  36. Digital Coyote wrote:

    @Queenb727

    I call all boobs mosquito bites if they’re being shown off when it’s inappropriate or not polite. It’s not a size issue as much as it is an “ick. put that away.” issue.

    I realize not everyone feels the same way.

  37. TeakLipstickFiend wrote:

    One commenter on Jezebel said “This is not subtle racism. This is social commentary.” What a joke. Any artistic justification of this is spurious. This is not social commentary, it is insulting. If fashion really did social commentary, then there’d be models of all sizes and all racial backgrounds in the industry. The only way this is social commentary is if it is the fashion industry saying (again): “we think only tall, blonde, white women are worthy”. Give me a bucket.

  38. Jason wrote:

    This was a great piece.

    “Blackface highlights the privileged universal empty point that white bodies continue to occupy even in this so-called postracial moment, and in so doing, it positions racial difference against whiteness, as the other to whiteness. ”

    I think the violence of revulsion adds to that experience where blackface has historically been used to maintain the erasure and distortion of black bodies literally

  39. Jennifer wrote:

    @dersk The Dutch (5 ft11.3inch) are NOT the tallest people in the world, The Sudanese (6 ft, 4in), are, only 7 African countries were included in that study, Sudan was not one of them. North Asian countries are not in the study either, there could be some North Asians taller than Sudanese.