Tickle Me Elmo and the Gangster Meme

by Guest Contributor Lisa, originally published at Sociological Images

Nikki L. sent us a link to this fascinating Tickle Me Elmo commercial.  In introduces a new Tickle Me Elmo product, “Tickle Hands.”

The ad takes place on what appears to be an urban street (reminiscent of Sesame Street).  Two of the kids appear white, while the other two look (probably deliberately vaguely) “racial,” maybe Asian and Latino (perhaps biracial).  At the very end of the commercial the kids pose in front of a brick wall with a picture of Elmo graffiti-style.  Two of them look like they’re flashing gang signs and Elmo, no joke, says “Yeahhhhhh Booooy.”  Here’s a screen shot of the moment:

And here’s the commercial:

So let’s trace the evolution of the gangster meme.

1.  Government policy strips urban centers of resources, jobs leave (along with useful things like grocery stores), housing prices fall and the poor become concentrated, and those with means move to the suburbs.  With few “above ground” economic options, people turn to “underground” economies.  With only the “underclass” left, politicians (who tend to listen more to those with economic power and cultural clout) continue policies that disinvest in urban communities of color.  Say “goodbye” to things like nice parks and excellent fire protection.

2.  In a world where obeying the rules gets you nowhere fast, violence flourishes.

3.  The suffering and resourcefulness of young black, Latino, and Asian men in these communities appeals to a (mostly) white “mainstream” America for whom depictions of men of color doing violence confirms their beliefs about white superiority and advanced “civilization.”  Hip hop and rap music becomes a huge money maker for music studios and producers (and a handful of men of color).

4.  As hip hop and rap become commodified, they are depoliticized.  The “oppositional consciousness” that once characterized these art forms becomes largely lost.  For the most part, any artist that wants to “make it” has to be and say what producers think that mainstream Americans want them to do and say.

5.  Now depoliticized, being “hard” and “urban” becomes synonymous with being “cool.”  Everyone wants to be cool.

6.  Being “gangster” is appropriated by white suburban youth.

7.  Stripped of any meaning, it filters down to younger and younger kids.

Enter: Tickle Me Elmo “tickle hand” gang signs.

For more examples of this phenomenon, see these advertising images at a shoe store, Beyonce’s House of Dereon clothing line for girls, the marketing for the Alvin and the Chipmunks remake, and these candy “grills.”

2.  In a world where obeying the rules gets you nowhere fast, violence flourishes.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Obama wins the nobel peace prize, and other news « Remember By Doing on 09 Oct 2009 at 1:09 pm

    [...] book for hanging a Glenn Ligon piece in the White House.  And here’s a great article about Gangster Elmo from Racialicious. leave a comment « Arm [...]

Comments

  1. Sean wrote:

    On one hand, I’m glad that the “gangsta-fication” of hip-hop has become worthy of a Sesame Street parody.

    On the other, it’s a vicious cycle that essentially ends the same: commodifying urban culture for mainstream consumption, while people who live in said communities continue to fall further behind.

    The big wheel keeps turning.

  2. queerhapa wrote:

    Gang signs? Really? I’ve watched the video a couple times and I just don’t see it. Dude, their hands are covered in muppet fur–what are they supposed to be signing? Methinks the author is conflating “urban” with “hip hop” with “rap” with “gangster.”

    Also, what’s up with calling the Asian and Latino kids vaguely “racial”???

  3. April217 wrote:

    Sorry, but I agree with queerhapa. I don’t see anything offensive or suspect about this commercial. I am not a gang culture aficionado but I don’t think crossed arms are the eminent domain of gang members. The whole thing looks like a play on America’s Best Dance Crew.

    And vaguely racial is a bad choice of words. I get what you were trying to say, but I don’t really like how you phrased that. Ouch!

  4. 7thangel wrote:

    like most at the original site stated, this isn’t ‘gangsta’ in any shape. it’s the old school hip hop pose, something hip hop crews still do.

    this wasn’t one of the better posts at sociological images and i didn’t expect it would get linked here

  5. Urban Suburbinite wrote:

    I’m most offended by the product. Tickle Hands? As innocent as they look, they sound like a pediphile’s dream product.

    Those Ads, you linked to are horrifying, especially the shoe store and Dereon ones. Very Jean-Bonnet Ramsey. Why can’t the black kids be photographed riding bikes and jumping rope? You know cute kid stuff. Oh that’s right, we black and brown people are never children, we spring from our mothers womb ready for sex, drugs, and violence. Ugh!

  6. distance88 wrote:

    This Sesame Street/gang affiliation connection reminds me of that scene from “The Office” when Darryl tells Michael Scott that gangs use “Fluffy Fingers” to ‘tickle-out’ their problems.

  7. Phil Deeze wrote:

    @ Urban Suburbinite:
    Co-sign. Tarting up kids, particularly girls, to look MUCH more adult than they are? Very high on the ick-meter for me. When you said “we spring from our mother’s womb ready for sex, drugs and violence” I almost finished the commercial with “Batteries not included” and expected a McDonald’s commercial to follow! LOL.
    The commercial wasn’t gangster or edgy at all. I did see a J.C. Penney TV ad recently where the kids were wearing hip-hop clothes and dancing b-boy style, and I figured that some white parents all over America probably clutched their pearls and caught the vapors. And, yes, they had some little white kids in the video KILLIN’ it almost as good as those youtube girls auditioning for Stroker’s doin’ the Stanky Leg. LOL.

  8. Persephone wrote:

    Wasn’t Sesame Street originally intended for inner-city kids, not “mainstream” suburban families? I thought the point of the show back in the 70s was for kids growing up in troubled neighborhoods to see something on TV that reflected their reality.

    Now that we’re more or less back in the 70s economically, maybe they’re just going back to their roots.

  9. Ruchama wrote:

    Wasn’t Sesame Street originally intended for inner-city kids, not “mainstream” suburban families?

    The setting was definitely meant to be urban. I’ve heard various theories about which neighborhood in particular was the basis for the set, but most places seem to say either Morningside Heights or Harlem.

  10. Ruchama wrote:

    Hmm. The Sesame Street that I remember was decidedly urban. But friends with small children tell me that Elmo has become a much bigger character than any of the others, and all the Elmo’s World segments take place inside an imaginary room.

  11. Ruchama wrote:

    Sesame Street has been doing rap since at least 1987: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YMeWP-guxA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBMxpDbp51A

  12. Rebecca Linz wrote:

    I always thought Sesame Street took place in Queens . . . I have a 2-year old, and SS is definitely different — and diverse — than it used to be. When I was growing up, I think Prairie Dawn was the only girl muppet! Now there are many more female characters (both human and puppet), Spanish-speaking characters, and people of color. A lot of people are surprised to learn that Elmo’s puppeteer and creator, Kevin Clash, is a black man, by the way.

  13. alc wrote:

    What about the fact that the guy who puppets (and voices) Elmo is black? Maybe he just thought it was a bit of cute cultural re-re-appropriation. And, as others have pointed out, Sesame Street was originally designed to appeal to and reflect the lives of urban dwellers and minorities. If you watch old Sesame Streets (like from the 60s, they are pretty hardcore “urban”. As in, the recently released DVDs are marked “Not for Children”

    Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkPh8As-y6E

    So, I think this could be interpreted as more of a return to Sesame Street’s roots, albeit in a de-toothed manner designed to blandly appeal broadly to modern overprotected suburban children.

  14. roy wrote:

    This is a very cynical article.
    “(Probably deliberately vaguely) racial?” Thats very unfair.. so the non-white kids didn’t live up to their stereotypes enough??
    Plus theres barely gangster associations bar the ending ‘yea booiiii’ which is so integrated into pop-culture that it has lost true value of it’s connotations anyway.

  15. Tapthepope wrote:

    Man,it seems that everyone is nit picking w/ history and details and not looking at the big glaring hip hop stereotype.

    Regardless of what hip hop Sesame st. has done in the past, you can’t say its not appropriation.

  16. Ruchama wrote:

    Regardless of what hip hop Sesame st. has done in the past, you can’t say its not appropriation.

    But one of the big goals of Sesame Street, at least in the beginning, was to make a show that reflected the world that their viewers live in. To avoid appropriation, and use only stuff that reflects the lives of the show’s creators, would entirely miss the point. Though this product itself goes against pretty much all of the original Sesame Street principles, since at first it was non-commercial, and then the original rules for tie-in merchandise were that it had to be inexpensive and educational. I’m not quite sure when that directive got diluted enough to allow Tickle Hands.

    This commercial was definitely not done all that well, but I agree with everyone else who said that they didn’t see gang signs in that pose. Hip hop, yes, but gangster, no.

  17. DreaD wrote:

    Sorry to be nihilistic, but hip hop BEEN commodified…like, for a minute. It’s over…game over. Give it up, it’s not what it used to be. And maybe this can be ok. What can we do NOW? We can use hip hop as a space to organize politically. We can use hip hop as a space to explore/discuss race…especially with the growing white underground hip hop scene. We can teach young women to be subjects/active participants, not just bootified objects within hip hop. (btw, I’m not really feeling the erasure of females in hip hop as described in your analysis, but whatev.). And maybe black folks can even concentrate on not equating ourselves in our entirety with an artform.

    Be active people…the “what happened to hip hop” convo is so tired. And yeah, I agree with Sean…at the end of the day, poor POCs living ACTUAL lives of violence/drugs/imprisonment/sexual violence, etc. as exoticized by *many* who love hip hop, continue to fall behind.

    And no, Elmo is not gangsta.

  18. Tapthepope wrote:

    @ Ruchama

    While I understand what you are saying the original goals of Sesame St. were, I don’t think its that way anymore.

    1) They’re audience demographic has changed. From what I’m gathering from everyone else it was supposed to be geared towards urban infants/toddlers. Now it’s primarily middle class white folk .

    2) There leadership behind the show has changed. How else can you explain this hot mess they call a toy. How are “tickle hands” at all educational?

    So yeah maybe if the leadership was in the same hands I could flow with the “back to the roots” argument. But its not, so me being cynical I automatically jump to the idea that they were just trying to sell a product using the means stated in the article.

  19. dejamorgana wrote:

    Cosign with everyone who said that a) this is not gangsta, and b) Sesame, and Elmo in particular, has always been urban in all senses of the word.

    Elmo is one of the newer characters, and has been the symbol of the Hip-Hop Generation since his creation. I remember an episode from a few years ago where John Leguizamo was teaching Elmo the correct way to say “what up, playa?” Which is a little problematic IMO, but I think that’s the way Sesame had to go to keep itself relevant to modern audiences. Most of the older muppets are becoming increasingly irrelevant to today’s kids, as our urban lives have changed.

    Elmo is also the only character in Sesame Street who makes frequent use of Internet technologies. He gets e-mail all the time and spends most of his segments in a cyberspace area that’s very “now”. At least, he did a few years ago. I haven’t seen the show in a while.