Casting & Race Part 1: The Tension [Essay]

by Guest Contributor (and frequent commenter) J Chang, originally published at Init_MovingPictures


Ever since news of The Last Airbender’s casting broke, there’s been a lot of commotion in the Asian American community about casting and how it seems that Asians are losing to white people in playing Asian characters. Now, there are issues present in the overall casting scene that people are picking up on here, but before I go further in depth on how race fits into casting, I want to lay down some groundwork for the discussion so that we know how to properly frame the arguments.

The Actor’s Craft

First and foremost, we need to acknowledge what the actor’s job is. As an actor, I’m aware of the theoretical paradox that we are placed in when playing a role. An actor is essentially taking on the role of someone that they are not. This artifice even extends to the rare case when an actor is playing themselves, as they are still “playing” a character on a stage or in front of a screen, rather than being themselves in real life.

In acting, even core identity matters such as sex, sexual orientation, ethnicity, of the actor, shouldn’t matter. Only that of the character. The actor’s job, their craft, is to play a character that is certainly not themselves. I’m not saying that an actor’s actual identity won’t influence the way they play their character, but that ideally, a talented actor will overcome their own identity to play the character believably.

But this is speaking only of the actual job of acting and not the negotiating between the actor, the audience and the medium.

Cinematic Verisimilitude

In acting’s historic roots on the stage and to this day, actors of varying backgrounds all take on roles of characters that may be wildly different from themselves. Due to the patriarchal attitudes on gender roles, many societies historically actually forbid women from acting, leading to many women originally being played by men. Eventually, women justly got their shot on stage, but as the stage developed, the actually need for verisimilitude on the stage faded as the space became increasingly abstracted and now, actors cross identity roles because of their talent and for art. For example, take the talented Mindy Kaling playing the role of Ben Affleck in the play, “Matt & Ben”, written by herself and Brenda Withers. This works for the stage since the theater is a largely abstracted space and simple symbolism is used to represent the constructed reality (the sets rarely actually appear to be the real thing).

Mainstream film, however, is a different beast. First of all, I’m not going to say that abstraction doesn’t exist in film. You can see it all over the films of Luis Bunuel, Jean Luc Godard or even the recent pseudo-biopic of Bob Dylan, I’m Not There, which features multiple actors (including Cate Blanchett) playing Bob Dylan.

But mainstream film, in particular, calls for a strong verisimilitude to our reality. In its case, the actual appearance matters. Not only do cars actually have to appear to be real cars, car crashes have to look like real car crashes. It’s because mainstream film usually presents a simulated reality. Granted, this simulated reality still lives by its own rules, but being a strongly visual medium, mainstream film lives and dies on visual consistency. If at any point a film fails to adhere to verisimilitude to our reality, it risks losing the audience’s willingness to suspend disbelief and can consequently lose the audience altogether, becoming too much to swallow.

This frequently happens if you happen to be a doctor and watch medical dramas, or any other specialist watching a television show or movie about your specialization. It takes you out of the picture when they get it wrong. And if you do that to the majority of your audience, it’s bad entertainment.

A Dash of Race

Without matters specific to race being present, there is already a tension present when it comes to cinematic presentation. Every actor is not only playing someone who they are not, they’re trying to effectively make their audience believe that they are the same person that they are not. This is the actor’s job. However, mainstream entertainment cinema demands visual verisimilitude. This means the actor not only have to convince the audience that they are capturing the role, but has to visually convince the audience of the same. And this is where race plays into the picture.

Race is predominantly a visual phenomena. While we can discuss the ways that race is determined outside of visual data, at least in immediate impression, most people in America determine race visually. Visual signifiers like skin color, hair texture, and body structure, broadly applied, are the primary indicators of race. When you throw such a visual concept into a world where cinematic verisimilitude is of high important, clearly film and television should care about how closely their actors can fit those identifiers of race. We wouldn’t believe in a Martin Luther King, Jr. played by a white man in a biopic.

So, as we prepare to enter this discussion about casting and race, we should keep both a respect for the actor’s craft, playing a role that is not themselves, as well as the understanding that what makes recorded visual entertainment media work, at least on its most basic level is an adherence to the principle of cinematic verisimilitude.

Next time I’ll dive a little into how casting and race actually play out in the real world and will touch on issues like colorface, cross-ethnic casting and changing characters to suit the actor. I’ll probably also touch on matters relating to actual racial/ethnic representation in casting. Then in a final piece, I will write about what certain casting and consumption practices imply, especially about inter-racial power relations, discuss some possible resolutions and open the floor to practical ideas for bringing justice to casting race.

Any thoughts and/or questions you’d like to see addressed, either directly in comments or perhaps in a later piece?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Casting & Race « Race, Gender, and Technology on 06 Oct 2009 at 11:24 pm

    [...] http://www.racialicious.com/2009/10/06/casting-race-part-1-the-tension-essay/ Categories: Uncategorized Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...]

Comments

  1. pmsrhino wrote:

    I just recently started watching Avatar (and thanks to Netflix not letting me watch all of them instantly I’m all like “but what happens next?!” D: ) and now I’m really kind of depressed by this movie. At first I heard about the mostly white class and I was like “yeah yeah, typical” but after watching the show I’m more angered by the decision. I understand that actors are supposed to play people who are not them and this can extend to race, sexuality, etc. but come on. It gets to a point where given a story that is rooted in China and the Chinese culture the people in Hollywood couldn’t come up with any actors who fit the characters race? Oh wait, sorry, they did manage to get a non-white actor to play THE VILLAIN. (unless they have changed the casting a little, it’s been awhile since I have really heard any concrete detail about the casting) It makes me think of how in the movie Section 9 based in South Africa they still managed to make all the main roles white people. Were there no great POC actors to choose from?

    These actors are not chosen in a vacuum. And with the long history of white people getting to pretty much play everyone it’s ridiculous to look at this and really try to justify it. (Like trying to justify guys playing women roles back in the day saying it wasn’t based on sexism and an idea that women do not belong in theater) Yes, I get their craft, but there are so many other opportunities for these white actors that will come along for them. White people are cast all the time. It’s hard for me to come up with movies that were not pretty much all white, anyways. Hard for me to think of a movie that had a cast that was mostly asian, hispanic, etc. that was not a movie that centered around the issue of race.

    It would just be super nice to see a movie that wasn’t white-centric that had nothing to do with race and everything to do with saving the world from the evil fire nation.

    And again, it just kills me that all the good characters are white actors while they managed to make the fire nation prince asian/middle eastern (I’ve only seen one picture of him :\ ). That by itself is enough for me to just be so angry at the lack of Chinese/asian cast members.

  2. Aristo wrote:

    It cheers me up a little bit to remember that most of the white people I’ve talked about this with in real life have found this casting just as wrong and ridiculous as I do.

    I guess there’s always a big divide between the minds of Hollywood executives and the general public. That must be how movies like Beverly Hills Chihuahua gets made.

  3. gatamala wrote:

    It takes you out of the picture when they get it wrong. And if you do that to the majority of your audience, it’s bad entertainment

    That’s exactly what that picture up top has done. I am distracted and cannot engage the story. I loved Avatar.

    The old white is universal/neutral/blank slate/flexible/malleable/capable/good works its way into the industry’s views on what is verisimilar.

    I’m looking forward to the other pieces.

  4. Mr. Noface wrote:

    There are films where creative liscense taken in racial casting don’t really hurt the film and the reality that it’s trying to convey, that much. There are other films however where something like getting a characters race or ethnic background wrong can derail the whole project. Films based on cartoons like Dragon Ball Z and Avatar: The Last Air bender fall into the latter category.

  5. Sam wrote:

    I look forward to this discussion.

    The casting decisions actually made me cry because I had been /so/ excited when I introduced the series to my little cousins. They’re First Nations and live in the Arctic, and in my lifetime and theirs there’s been a serious lack of FN actors in the media playing anything but characters whose characterisation hinge on being FN. To have a brown girl in a parka helping to save the world with powers that are no more magical than anyone else’s was amazing.

    The saddest thing is that I don’t think my cousins are old enough to understand that this is racism on the studio and production’s part, no matter how I’ve tried to explain it – what they hear instead is, “Katara never really looked like you at all. She’s pretty and smart, and someone like that looks like this, not like you.”

  6. foshothoyo wrote:

    seriously, people need to boycott this kind of thing.

  7. Eva wrote:

    I look forward to the discussion too. I think this is very important. Interesting that this rarely comes up regarding Broadway. In the movie Chicago, the roles of Velma, Roxie and Billy Flynn were played by white people, but on Broadway, all three of those parts have been played by black actors (Usher and Robin Givens are two I can remember). There was a play about Edith Piaf where a black man played her lover, even though in real life, her lover was not black. And I once saw Andre Braugher as Henry V and no one in the audience got up and said they couldn’t watch the play because Henry V was played by a black man.

    So what’s the deal with film being all white? Do they really think if the cast of Avatar were all Asian people would walk out of the theater?

  8. Dee wrote:

    I think this is especially frustrating with Avatar because the cartoon did such an incredibly great job handling race and culture. The producers seriously researched their asses off to get it right.

    This whole thing makes me really sad. I teach fifth grade in a school with a mostly Latino student body. The show’s still pretty popular with the kids even though it’s finished, and I get a pretty strong sense that for some of the girls in my class, it means a lot that Katara is a brown girl who kicks butt.

  9. Marie wrote:

    I’m curious to see the movie because I love special effects, but in the end I think I’ll probably boycott it. I’m far too disgusted with their casting decisions to give it any money.

    I just feel sorry for the kids who fell in love with the show. They’re feeling the first sting of realization that their heritage is just some exotic backdrop for white people to enjoy.

    I wish they had just made an animated movie for the big screen, if they were that set on it. It could have been awesome!

  10. Rachel wrote:

    I’m really glad that you’ll be posting on this topic, which is something I’ve been interested in for the better part of the year.

    The example that came to my mind when I thought of how changing a character’s race completely derails how a story was originally written was the movie “New in Town” with Renee Zellweger. The character she portrayed (a career-oriented woman who is sent up to some small town in Minnesota or somewhere) was originally supposed to be a woman of color. Sending a woman of color to some small town has completely different implications which clearly didn’t happened with Zellweger playing the part.

    I look forward to the rest of your posts.

  11. Zahra wrote:

    Like the way this essay framed the discussion, by talking about the actor’s role and the expectation of cinematic verisimilitude. I agree that in the theatre there’s not the same expectation–and theatre is (sadly) less and less of a mainstream art, aimed at a self-selecting audience. (Not that I am convinced theatre audiences are somehow less racist than mainstream film ones, but I think the producers of both industry believe they are.)

    Really looking forward to the next pieces in the series. Oh, and I’d love to see a “What You Can Do” edition–what power, if any, do we as audience members have to influence casting? Obviously there’s boycotting atrocities like the racelifted Avatar, but what can we do to create the perception of a market (because really, I think the market already exists) for films starring people of color?

  12. TheVoiceOfReason wrote:

    I have already heard the news. I will not be seeing that film. I loved the series but I think it’s really sad that M. Night Shamalan has done such a despicable act. Like seriously would hollywood cast people of color for Lord Of The Rings? The Lion The Witch and The Wardrobe? Nah. I feel that the young actors and actresses should have been fired and replaced. Little children of color get their hearts trampled on all the time in hollywood. Let the white kids get the boot for a change. When they grow up they will understand that those types of roles are not for them.

  13. TheVoiceOfReason wrote:

    Oh one more thing go on IMDB and go to the films page. there are message boards under the page with alot of whites justifying and defending this treacherous act. It’s sad how there are whites out there who only think of themselves.

  14. Ejunco wrote:

    If pisses me of, that people defend this movie and saying it’s ok to have the white people play Asian parts. I’ve met white people, who say the characters in Avatar don’t look Asian… and I respond well then how are Asians suppose to look like? Now all of us have squinty eyes and funny accents!

  15. momo wrote:

    To cast the movie with not a single person of Asian or FN ancestry is just plain insulting. If they had any sort of respect for the cultures that form the basis of this entire fictional universe, they would have made an attempt to accurately represent not only the costumes and the customs but also the PEOPLE who created that culture.

  16. Maria wrote:

    @TheVoiceOfReason
    Oh my, NEVER go to IMDb boards for topics like this. Someone once successfully (wtf!) used the Report Abuse feature there to have a comment of mine deleted. I had complained about how the Heroes cast gets whiter and whiter, and the user didn’t want to hear of it. The moderators clearly failed to read the comment before deleting it, which just further makes IMDb a really, really bad place for discussions of serious topics.

    I also made the mistake of looking at the IMDb boards for BBC’s Merlin TV show. There are a lot of people there who complain about the show’s casting of a black woman as Guinevere, and some of the comments are sickening and nasty. See, Merlin is a show that messes a lot with the original myths. Merlin and Arthur are both the same age and teenagers, Sir Bevedere and other famous Knights of the Round Table are randomly killed off by monsters of the week… but people can deal with all these changes, it’s just the casting of a (relatively light-skinned) black woman in a traditionally white role that they cannot, cannot accept, even one year after the fact.

  17. Ultraviolet wrote:

    Marie: “They’re feeling the first sting of realization that their heritage is just some exotic backdrop for white people to enjoy.”

    Yeah…that’s an interesting thought that, as a big fan of the show, I hadn’t really considered when all of this crap about the casting started coming to light — like everyone else, I was pissed that Paramount had whitewashed heroic roles and somehow didn’t think anyone would notice.

    But then a friend of mine wrote this article (http://flowtv.org/?p=4215), and I got to thinking…

    I wonder if part of the problem we’re facing is that we started with Mike D. and Bryan K., two white guys (one could say very respectfully) co-opting Asian culture to fit with their cool concept of ‘bending’ and creating a fictional universe and show based on that. I wonder if because it was a couple of white guys who were -in- the boardroom to pitch it and receive the greenlight to develop it (rather than Asians or Asian-Americans), a decision like this casting awfulness was made easier.

    They came up with this idea, and researched and relied on Asians and Asian-Americans (like Sifu Kisu and the East-West Players, etc.) but despite the fact that they relied on them and did this research, that world was still ‘theirs’…they still got to take credit for ‘creating’ it when maybe you could argue that they came up with a framework, a basic conceit, and then took the wide amalgam of all things ASIA and filled that framework up.

    But then you run into this issue with the film of “well, since a couple of white guys outfitted this conceit with whatever parts of asian culture they wanted, I guess we can just cut and paste Asian culture that with some white people and then call everyone else ‘diverse’”.

    And I think it’s compounded by the fact that we don’t have Mike and Bryan specifically on the record saying “Aang is such and such background, Katara is…” with individual characters. They generally have only described the show in as an “Asian” fantasy.

    But even though, for example, it’s fairly obvious (especially in context) that Aang is NOT white (mentor named “Gyatso”, Avatar selected by picking certain items)…he has big cute eyes that can signal youth/innocence, and when white is default, some people see an animated character like Aang and assume whiteness regardless of the other indicators…which is idiotic, but have you looked around at some of the forums where people argue in support of the casting? It would have been good to have the creators on the record talking about specific backgrounds, but maybe they were discouraged to by Nickelodeon…which takes us back to our original problem in the boardroom.

    Just thoughts that have been on my mind since the FLOW article came out, and this discussion of fantasy and theatre vs. film reality and the issues in representing race therein just solidified them for me a bit…

  18. m. wrote:

    Those characters in the picture are obviously supposed to be either Inuit, Inupiat or Yupik (my guess is Inuit, though). I don’t understand why everyone has been implying that these characters are all supposed to be Asian or simply ignores the issue of casting actors that aren’t Indigenous. Ugh.

    Mod Note – Search “the Last Airbender” to see the whole controversy. The characters in the series were more or less Asian, and the backgrounds (among other things) pointed to East Asian traditions and iconography. As was noted in a previous post, the casting decision was for white characters to play these roles and they were outfitted in a vaguely indigenous way. In short, this picture does not reflect the series. – LDP

  19. Jha wrote:

    I actually had to explain the concept of “defaulting” to a certain race (ie, white) when a character’s race is not clear. Fortunately, the explanation was successful. It’s amazing how in this day and age, these things just don’t occur to many people…

  20. 7thangel wrote:

    i’m actually kind of worn out arguing about this. i’m racebendered out.
    it was made worse when news of a possible live action film of akira set in new york came up recently.

    i didn’t bother to argue that it should be set in japan, that’s a little more iffy when adapting something, but instead expressed my disappointment about the white actor possibly playing tetsuo.

    after explaining that , yes, there are asian americans in new york and yes, there are known asian actors and yes, even if you change tetsuo’s name to ted he can still be played by an asian american…because, shock, some have those so-called ‘normal’ names that they’re associating with white folk, and once again, yes, even if it takes place in new york it can still star an asian american actor….some couldn’t hear it.

    hell, i was even called a racist by some ass because i happened to say that i hoped the studio give asian american actors some consideration when casting the lead roles. the horror.

    and among the usual bingo shite, when someone brought up the ‘it shouldn’t matter, why can’t they be white ‘meme, i asked them if it doesn’t matter, why not a black dude playing tetsuo? i don’t remember if it got answered.

    at least i wasn’t alone but it’s very tiresome and draining.

    i actually hope they cast will smith as one of the iconic white superheroes they always have him rumoured to play, just to see their heads explode. we’ll see how much race doesn’t matter then

  21. dejamorgana wrote:

    First, I liked the groundworking introduction. Can’t wait to read the rest of the series. I can think of a lot of examples where odd casting choices murdered my suspension of disbelief, and some where casting against the preconceptions actually improved a movie – right now, Kevin Smith’s casting Alannis Morrisette as God in Dogma stands out in my mind as a really wonderful example of that.

    Airbender is standing out as an example of the exact opposite – you can’t do this kind of thing when the race of the characters is an important element of the story. You can change races when race doesn’t really feature in the story. I could buy Will Smith playing Robert Neville in “I Am Legend”, despite my preconception of Neville as a white man, because race wasn’t really a factor anywhere in that story, what Neville really represented was Everyman, and in the end the only question was, is the actor good enough to carry the role? He was, so all’s well. (Well, at least until they murdered the ending, but that’s a whole different problem…)

    In honesty, I probably wouldn’t accept a black Guinevere as easily. To me, turning a central character of the very white Arthurian legend into a black woman is just jarring. Unless they gave some really good background reasoning for it, my brain would not be able to stop saying things like “blatant tokenism”, “revisionist history/mythology” and sarcastically going “wow, isn’t it nice that there was no racism whatsoever in Arthur’s time?” I find it despicable when movies and TV shows try to pretend that racism didn’t exist in various historical times. However, I haven’t seen the show, so it’s possible that they did give a good reason for this.

    But when you take a work of fiction that’s deeply connected to a certain aspect of race or ethnicity and you try to just erase it, it just stinks. I’ll never watch the TV version of “A Wizard of Earthsea” because of that. Ursula K. Le Guin mentioned her characters’ dark skin (and the light skin of her bad guys) many times in the books because she felt it was a key component of Earthsea. Her heroes were not white guys. That was one of the central ideas. And I feel the same way about The Last Airbender. I haven’t even seen the show, and I know that it doesn’t make sense with white heroes. I see no point in watching this movie if such a central element of the show’s uniqueness has been destroyed.

    I just read something today that disturbs me even more than Airbender, though. This is the Hollywood version of the story of the dog Hachiko. In Japan, this is a major cultural icon – the Akita dog who waited for his master every evening at the train station, and after his master died, kept on waiting for him at the train station every evening for another 10 years. It’s an amazing story about a real dog, and it’s quintessentially Japanese – the Akita is even a Japanese breed. But apparently, someone in Hollywood thought it would be okay to make this touching piece of Japanese reality into an American work of fiction, set in Rhode Island and starring Richard Gere (but the dog is still an Akita, because obviously you can’t change the DOG’S race!) I’m just completely WTFing at this, wondering do they honestly not think it makes any difference?

    But then again, it’s Hollywood, the world’s biggest money-making machine, and there isn’t much they won’t desecrate if there’s a buck to be made. They won’t make it from me, though.

  22. pandoradeloeste wrote:

    @Ultraviolet

    Dumb question: is Sifu Kisu actually Asian? His wiki page says he grew up in Toronto, and he appears to be black/African-Canadian.

    (Ultimately it doesn’t matter, as your point still stands – I’m just curious.)

  23. ashlynn wrote:

    The crazy thing to me is, when I look at that photo of that actor playing Aang, there is nothing appealing there whatsoever. I see virtually no emotion of hint of anything in his eyes. So very blank, flat, plain, dull, boring. This film has literally been drained of any color.

    I was talking to a coworker the other day(who is Black), and though I don’t remember the specifics, we were discussing black models being casted in ads. I was saying that clearly there’s a huge gap between white models and model of color, and she actually argues AGAINST that. She goes,

    “Well, agents can’t cast black models if they aren’t going to castings.”

    Appalled isn’t EVEN the word. I won’t rant here, but my point is that I’ve actually found that a lot of PoC’s actually internalize the BS excuses white media spits out in defense of their racism; in fact, many do somewhat act as if we are post-racial. I would love to see this at least touched on in later posts.

  24. cathy wrote:

    The origonal show creators are attributed to have said that the characters are sort of racial composites. Apparantly, the live action director took that to mean super pale white people. I think that given the origonal creators’ statements, this would have been a great chance to cast multiracial and biracial actors. Also, I’m not angry because they altered one character, I’m angry because they whitened up all of the good guys and darkened the villain. If Aang had been cast black, it might have been a little off putting, but it would not have made me feel the anger I do about how they whiten good characters and darken villains.

  25. Maria wrote:

    She goes,
    “Well, agents can’t cast black models if they aren’t going to castings.”

    Yeah, that’s like the painful “They just chose the best actors regardless of their skin colour!” argument. X_x Ashlynn is completely right about how unappealing Aang’s actor looks.
    Didn’t I hear somewhere that he wasn’t even a professional actor to begin with? He has no charme and no charisma. If there is one thing Aang needs, it’s charisma. The whole story’s atmosphere goes down the drain if Aang is played by a moping, emotionless little guy.
    All I see when I look at the cast pictures is some bored kids dressing up as Aang, Katara and Sokka, and hating it.

  26. lysse wrote:

    There is at least one good thing that has come out of this movie’s casting: as an Avatar fan, it made me (fully) aware of racial issues, in the media and otherwise (I’d heard of the problems with “21″, but nothing sunk in until Avatar was cast). Now I’m reading blogs like this, The Angry Black Woman, stuff white people do, and Sociological Images every day, and if I ever have time I’ll do some good-old-fashion book learning too. It’s also inspired me to educate others about the types of privilege, and I’ve raised dialogues with my parents, whom I hope to eventually fully engage in such discussions.

    In short: the Avatar casting controversy made me a (still-new, still-learning) ally. I’ll be boycotting them fully, but I hope there’s more silver linings like mine out there!

  27. Jenifa O Jenny wrote:

    As a casting person I feel it is somewhat true that unknown Black actors/models are less likely to attend auditions and cattle calls. In my experience the hierarchy is as follows: every thin white woman over 5′5″ will show up, a lot of fairskinned/mixed raced woman of african descent will show up and I will be eventually surprised by a some asians/latinos with a few self confident dark skinned black women sprinkled in the mix.

    This summer I worked for a production that placed an ad in Back Stage requesting headshot submissions for a Contemporary Urban Drama. The producers thought by inserting the code word ‘Urban’ the readers would know he was seeking young African Americans. WRONG. After going through hundreds of white actors to find a black one, I placed another ad in Back Stage, this time specifying african-american actors only. Wouldn’t you know I still had to sift through the Beckys to find a black girl? I am still so angry!!!! What is it like to have a sense of entitlement so strong that you believe everything in the world is for you? That even when someone else’s story is being told, it has to be told by you & someone that looks like you in order for you to relate to it.

    And let me put ya’ll on to something. When it comes to NYC SAG extras-they will threaten discrimination lawsuits in order to get background work on an ‘urban’ project, then turn around and complain when they have a 6 am or 8 pm call time in the middle of Harlem or Bed-Stuy.

    From Hollywood to Bollywood, filmakers, crew and actors abide by the rule white/light is right. Why? Because they are human beings. I firmly believe the actors of color especially black and asian need higher self esteem when attending casting sessions and should attend as many castings as possible, if only to get experience.

  28. veebot wrote:

    The truth is people are just tired of seeing the same old white washed faces for everything. Its boring.

    The world has opened up and it turnes out that there are a whole lot of people out there not just white.

    Hollywood needs a kick up the ass

  29. Eva wrote:

    @dejamorgana:

    I see your point regarding Merlin; however the entire show messes with the legend. Arthur and Merlin are both the same age, there’s a seven foot tall dragon that only Merlin talks to, banisters on the staircases; Morgana isn’t Arthur’s sister, Guenevere is Morgana’s maid.

    So there are a host of things that are so different, the fact that Guenevere is played by a black woman is just one of them.

  30. blah wrote:

    Isn’t it problematic that they made Gwen Black and now she’s not a noblewoman but a maid?

  31. Maria wrote:

    @dejamorgana
    I don’t think anybody who watches the show could take it too seriously when it comes to historical accuracy or the content of the myths it employs. It is a fairly simple kind of entertainment, and no one would ever mistake it for either real history or the actual myth.
    By the way, the IMDb comments I was talking about didn’t simply object to the casting because of accuracy or something. They specifically called the actress “ugly” and “grotesque”, and described her skin as “mud-like”. I don’t think they were simply worried about
    By the way – don’t a lot of TV shows set in the present also act as if racism doesn’t exist? I’m not saying it’s a good thing, but I don’t think Merlin is a unique case with its characters of colour whose ethnicity is never a topic – and they have the “fantasy world” excuse, unlike stories set in the real world.

  32. Linds wrote:

    @Maria – It is true that Noah Ringer, who plays Aang, has no acting experience. They went to Texas, of all places, looking for Aang (gee, I wonder why they didn’t find any Asian-American actors in Texas… could it be there were looking for Caucasian actors??). This kid could do martial arts so they hired him. We have several documented cases of Asian-American boys who have equal or greater martial arts skills AND acting experience who auditioned yet weren’t even considered for the role. It is very sad.

    Te animatic editor for the show herself stated that they specifically drew the characters to be Asian and Inuit and that they were modeled off of real Asian and Inuit people they knew. So the “the characters look white” argument doesn’t hold water. It’s been shown that they were intended to be Asian and should have been Asian but were deliberately changed to Caucasian for the movie. It is very sad. My family was excited to see this movie but none of us will be seeing it now.

  33. Sabrina wrote:

    Really looking forward to the rest of the series! :)

    My 2 European cents on the Merlin debate: I honestly haven’t seen the series, yet, but from what I heard/read so far is that they completely mess with everything up to the point where you barely recognize the characters. Do I find it problematic? Honestly, no. Regardless of the series’ quality (Idk how good they handle their storytelling) it’s a fact that the Merlin/Arthur story has been adapted to death. There are countless books and movies about the same old legend with some variations here and there. Adding another one to the pool of adaptations that are very very loosely based on the original won’t do much harm. Everybody knows the story anyway. So why not spice it up a bit?
    (That said, making Gwen black and a maid is a bit WTF worthy. Seems they weren’t progressive enough to make her black and let her stay a noblewoman.)

    Some may now think “Hey, they are basically doing the same thing with Avatar now! Completely messing with everything up to the point where you barely recognize the characters! It’s Shyamalan’s vision after all!” Is it? I think at that point we really need to ask ourselves how much artistic freedom can/should we allow when it comes to adaptations.

    Imho it highly depends on the source material.
    With Merlin/Arthur we have a source that is widely known. Same with a lot of other European stories (fairytales, legends, dramas etc.).
    With Avatar (or Earthsea, 21 and countless other adaptations) we have pretty new material. Big movie adaptations quite often present the characters and their stories to a wider audience for the first time. And also quite often the audience associates the movies rather than the original sources when they think of a certain story. When someone mentions LotR most people will think of Elijah Wood as Frodo rather than whatever image they had in mind when they read the book (if they read it at all). So a movie adaptation is very important when it comes to the audience’s perception. This is where I think a certain “moral obligation” of the movie makers towards the fans/audience comes into play. It’s obviously that they are expected to make a faithful adaptation – especially with stuff like Avatar that was widely praised by critics. But Hollywood and moral obligations don’t do well together, it seems. At least it occurred to no one that many people liked the cartoon as it was – including the Asian/Inuit inspired characters.

    Bottom-line – naturally, the more adaptations of a story exist the more tolerant the audience will be on that matter. The fewer the number of adaptations the higher the pressure to make a faithful adaptation. (At least that’s what I could observe when it comes to fans and adaptations.) But Hollywood fails over and over again with the latter and for Idk what reason thinks their audience can’t handle PoC actors/stories. Being part of said audience I find their mindset offending and infuriating.

  34. lysse wrote:

    On the subject of “Merlin”, speaking as an American living in the UK, it has to be remembered that the show is British and that the UK has a VERY different history of race-relations than the US. I haven’t seen casting calls or anything, but I highly doubt that a) Gwen was changed to be a maid when Ms. Coulby was cast, or b) that the ethnicity of Gwen-the-maid was specified to be black, and thus Ms. Coulby was cast.

  35. JC wrote:

    This movie is one of the main reasons I’ve decided not to raise my future child in the US.

  36. Titanis walleri wrote:

    “It’s an amazing story about a real dog, and it’s quintessentially Japanese – the Akita is even a Japanese breed.”
    There’s nothing particularly Japanese about the actual story other than where it happened, iirc. “Dog remains loyal to dead owner” is a very widespread story, and it’s happened at least two other times I can think of…

  37. Auska Nosaka wrote:

    @ 7thangel:

    I was called a racist today because I voiced my discomfort with the casting of the Avatar movie because I believe that they should go to people of color because, well the cast, appears to mostly be people of color.

    Then he went to say that maybe Asians should try harder to get the roles.

    *Sigh*

    Ignorance is blistering.

  38. Vina wrote:

    Thank you for the discussion of abstraction versus verisimilitude. I’ve been trying to put those concepts into words for some time now, and I look forward to the rest of the discussion on the controversy.

    @Blah – Keep in mind that in this version, Merlin is Arthur’s manservant. So Gwen being Morgana’s maid puts her in the position of being Merlin’s social equal and occasional confidant. And she’s never portrayed as being particularly subservient.

  39. ashlynn wrote:

    @Jenifa O Jenny:

    As a young actress, when I go through casting listings and see “Jenny, young white female, slender in her 20’s”, THAT’S why I don’t go. PoC actors and actresses don’t even get a chance to showcase their skills; they are rejected before the page even finishes loading. I should not have to feel like I will have to go into an audition and pull a miracle out of my ass so that a casting director can see that not only can I do this part more justice than the next chick, but the next white chick who will be easier to market because she’s is not only accepted in mainstream culture, but IS mainstream culture.

  40. DK wrote:

    I was also worried about Gwen as a black woman being a maid, but after watching “Merlin,” I feel like Gwen’s a servant because the writers added it in as an extra twist (on top of Arthur & Merlin being the same age, and Morgana not being related to Arthur) in which the servant later becomes queen.

    As Vina pointed out, Merlin’s a servant too (Arthur’s) and I feel that Merlin gets the more dehumanizing treatment: Gwen and Morgana are depicted almost like friends (but that might just be because Morgana is less arrogant than Arthur; Morgana and Gwen are criminally underused, and the overall depiction of women suffer for it).

    They’re also going full-speed ahead with the Arthur-Gwen-Lancelot love triangle.

    I could maybe see race taking part in the casting process, as the casting directors may decide that it will be easier for audiences to see a black woman as a servant who (while being strong, capable, and having opinions) will initially hold them back than as a magically-powerful-potential-villainness who (for the moment) is King Uther’s beloved adopted daughter.

  41. Jenifa O Jenny wrote:

    @ashlynn

    As a young actress, when I go through casting listings and see “Jenny, young white female, slender in her 20’s”, THAT’S why I don’t go.

    This is exactly my point. If white actors can show up to open calls for AA woman, early 20’s, you should feel just as confident about checking out the Jenny audition. NYC actors know that even the most ghetto, profane production can provide roles for white actors. Doing a film about drug dealers? White actors know can play law enforcement and bureaucrats. Doing a film about Wall Street? Plenty of roles for people of color. Maybe not the lead but a) there’s no such thing as a small role and b) producers and casting people will become familiar with you if your on set enough. You have to be in it to win it. Don’t wait to be invited, crash the party!