Diversity Is the Spice of Life…Unless You’re the Spice
By Sexual Correspondent Andrea (AJ) Plaid
When my wife and I started LoveVoodoo 6 years ago, we wanted the site to bring people together. Many of the other adult dating or ‘Swingers’ sites are very segregated. There are “Black” swinger sites, “Hispanic” swinger sites and very little diversity on the larger sites. This never made any sense to us. Why not have a site where everyone is welcome and could feel comfortable? I think we have achieved this goal on LoveVoodoo.com; however, we wanted to take it to the next level. It is funny that we are calling this event “Colorful Fantasies”, but I think the exciting part of the trip is not, that you meet someone different than yourself. The exciting part is to learn how similar we actually are. LoveVoodoo.com and Colorful Fantasies are businesses that reflect our personal beliefs.
~~Todd Crawford, co-founder, LoveVoodoo.com
So said the press release for a race-inclusive swinging website.
I didn’t have enough hands to facepalm, to brow massage, to clasp in prayer.
I went to the site. This is what I found:

I need more hands.
It’s not the swinging I’m against: Racialicizens, please. If anything, I’m quite for it because it (and polyamory, for that matter) is an acknowledgment that some people feel sexual and/or romantic desires for others beside their primary partner and both people are willing and able to enjoy other partners in a consensual—and safer-sex–environment. And before folks want to climb on a table at the Anti-Racism Bar and, drunk on a sense of (self-) righteous, pontificate about the inherent evils of interracial swinging because it’s a breeding ground for racism and cheating and other social ills, let’s get a couple of things crystal:
There’s a big difference between swinging and cheating, as most swingers are open and honest with their partners they are unlikely to be receptive to people cheating on their partners in order to have sex. Most of the swinging community is made up with like minded swinging couples that like to share, unfortunately there are a lot of single males that try to get into the action and its not unknown for a single male to turn up to a swinging partner without a partner using the old ’she couldn’t make it excuse’. Single women and single bi-sexual women are generally welcome at most clubs, single men and bi-sexual single men are to a lesser extent.
The defining characteristic of polyamory is belief in the possibility of, and value of, multiple romantic loving relationships carried out “with the knowledge and consent of all partners concerned.”What distinguishes polyamory from traditional forms of non-monogamy (i.e. “cheating”) is an ideology that openness, goodwill, intense communication, and ethical behavior should prevail among all the parties involved. Powerful intimate bonding among three or more persons may occur. Some consider polyamory to be, at its root, the generalization of romantic couple-love beyond two people into something larger and more fundamental.
Furthermore:
It is possible for a person with polyamorous relationships to also engage in casual sex, traditional swinging, and other open relationships. Sometimes polyamorous people have been known to engage in infidelities or secret affairs, although this is no better accepted in polyamorous communities than in monogamous ones.
Or as blogger dopegirlfresh tweeted:
[T]here’s a diff[erence] [between] polyamory and just fucking for the sake of doing so. [People] have it twisted. [U]sually, polyamory involves not lying to your partner about where you are . . .
- Polyamory and swinging may overlap but aren’t the same. Swinging is about having recreational sex with other people–be it at a swingers’ party or as a long-term sexual relationship–with full consent of one’s partner. Polyamory, as mentioned above, is about forming multiple romantic relationships with people with full consent of all the people involved.
- Considering how pervasive racism is–and sexualized racism is–any sexual encounter between and among people of different race has the potential to lay bare all sorts of free-floating racist notions well before people, well, lay bare. I repeat: it has the potential. It does not mean that it will happen.
- A particular type of partner arrangement does not inherently manifest or conceal these notions. Thus, interracial swinging does not breed or bring forth racist notions due to the number and race of sex partners any more or than a monogamous interracial couple magically erases their racism by virtue of the fact of their being committed pair.
Now, before people start saying “race play” like it’s a new word learned on Jeopardy! and hoping to use as a hip point at said Anti-Racism Bar: interracial swinging is not race play. This is not a staged setting where people explicitly agreeing to act out a particular racialized scenario, like a white man playing a cuckholded husband who wants to see his white wife have sex specifically with a Black man while, say, he hides in a closet and masturbates. Race play, a form of BDSM, can be incorporated into swinging.
No, considering how the site is presenting itself, race is in play….and not in the way Crawford intended in his statement.
According to sexologist Bianca Laureano, histories and narratives about swinging have been rather PoC-free. Only one show about swinging featured a Black couple (‘cause, you know, Black people are the go-to visual signifiers for diversity in media). A cursory online search does support what Crawford says about swinging’s racial segregation, along with some other observations about the sites for swingers of color:
- On some Latin@ swinging sites, the text states the groups are geared for couples and single women, not single men. No mention of sexual and gender identities. And the homepage photos are only of dark-haired, dark-eyed, olive-skinned Latinas.
- Some of the Black swingers sites make no mention on their homepage about to whom the sites are aimed nor too much about sexual or gender identities. Some sites’ banners feature Black women, either in the nude or bondage gear with some visual centering of their behinds. One site had “random member photos” with almost half of them being women in doggie-style butt or vaginal shots or the men in “long schlong” shots.
- “Asian” or “Asian American swingers” as a search string seems to lead to general swingers sites…or porn. Input “South Asian swinger”, and one finds a blog called “Adult Indian Swingers in New Delhi” with a single post from 2006. Its FAQ states that only straight couples and bisexual women are allowed; no “single guy/male” or “gays” allowed.
- “Arab swinger” leads to a subpage from a general swinger site for “Arab Swingers in Alabama.” Nothing for 1st Nations or multiethnic or biracial swingers.
So, yes, I can see why such a organization like LoveVoodoo would exist in terms of wanting to the races to come together (pun intended) in one big orgy. I just think the way the founders are doing it is a bit of fail. LoveVoodoo’s PR statement falls into the usual ish wrapped in diversity-reach lingo and with a bow of good intentions.
What I’m not digging are the insulting efforts to attract swingers of color. Posting *a* Spanish word and having various, ahem, “ethnic” graphics shows cultural imcompetency because 1) a word doesn’t signify any understanding of the complexities that are Latin@ ethnicities and their sexualities and 2) showing random artifacts of what one thinks are cultural emblems of a particular group to represent an entire ethnic group does not show how accepting zie is about the group.

It’s stereotyping at its laziest. The insults abound around LoveVoodoo: the name itself degrades this highly complex African-based faith by equating it with simple and cheap spell-casting aimed at manipulating others into wanting people into having sex (like a metaphysical “roofie”). It also plays upon the stereotyped anticipation of swinging with people of color will be a ‘darkly magical” outer-body experience of out-of-control, buckwild sex and orgasms that only we Black and Brown types provide when we mount (pun intended) our partners.
(Their naming this site and cruises with such appellations is like my (imaginary) Irish-American partner and me calling our adult website for people looking for similar partnerings “Afro-Leprechaun Love” and our cruises for the lifestyle “Black Shamrock Swing” and “Ship o’ Swap” and then talk about our earnestly wanting Black and Irish people to get together due to our parallel histories of oppression. And having the site’s photos only of white people.)
The insult also rests in the incentive of why PoCs should join the this site and the cruises: the visual promise of all the white women one can sex up because, ya know, all swingers of color fantasize about sucking and fucking available and willing nubile white ladies. (This is also the linchpin of a lot of interracial porn.) That’s who is mostly seen in the site’s photos from the homepage to the visitor’s tour. None of the photos has a person of size unless one checks out their “Big on the Beach” cruise—and the model seen in the banner is of an indefinite size due to how she’s positioned and is racially ambiguous; the only people who are may look older are in a very small thumbnail-sized picture which is off to the left of a row of photos on the homepage. And, if the photos are anything to go by: Asian American men, multiracial guys, 1st Nation dudes, other non-Black, non-Latin@ fellows, and women of color—you all may have to wait for your own offensively named cruises to another sunny-with-beaches-and-dusky-citizens “developing” nation to serve as your own sexcapade playground and backdrop for your Spring Break-like snaps.
Oh, and this winceble copy from “LoveVoodoo Loco” ad:

LoveVoodoo Loco moves to the white sand beaches of the world famous Hedonism II located in Negril Jamaica. For one week only, the Jamaicans are trading in their Rum for Tequila, Jerk Chicken for Carne Asada, and those silly fake Dread Lock hats for Sombreros!
LoveVoodoo Loco is the only Latin themed Lifestyle event in existence. It is a great place to meet other open minded couples and singles to fulfill your fantasies or just relax on the beach with your significant other, sip a Margarita, and take in the sun.
LoveVoodooo Loco will take place May 1 – May 8. You can experience all Jamaica has to offer, plus fun Latin themed events, cuisine, and entertainment. Each night we will offer cuisine and entertainment from a different country. Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Cuba, Peru, Puerto Rico and may more. How about a “Dirty Piñata” contest?? Wait until you see what we fill it with!!
We will have Spanish to English translators on staff to assist with check in and ensure that you have a trouble free stay! Whether you from Hispanic decent or just a lover of all things Latin. LoveVoodoo Loco is the trip for you.
Comparatively speaking, race play has an unvarnished honesty about it; this particular organization and its programs work with some racial disingenuousness under the guise of integration, of wanting to “make everyone ”comfortable” so they can fulfill their “wildest fantasies.” I’m not sure about who exactly is supposed to be “everyone” because, even though the site may be open to different sexual and gender identities, the majority of photos on the site are of white people or very, very light-skinned PoCs. And just saying you want PoCs to join doesn’t make the wish so, especially when the pictures and texts say a thousand contradictory and uncomfortable things.
Now, while I typed about my chagrin concerning this website, the site’s “Hedonism Fest 2009” scheduled for November had only 20 spots left.
Some people like–and like being–the spice.

Carmen Van Kerckhove is co-founder and president of
Chris wrote:
Slow day for news huh?
I’d like to think we’ve flushed out the misconceptions and structural oppressions of monogamy before we start to tackle Swinging and Polygamy.
I am completely for people of all genders to take full control of their sexuality and create whatever experience they want, but I think viewing people who practice polygamy and swingers as a an oppressed minority is starting to blur the lines and it complicates some of the fundamental discussions we might have.
This article is highly niche, and if Racialicious is trying to engage a large audience and make them feel excited about coming here to raise awareness, I think we should start by focusing on some fundamental concepts.
Well written, just very complex.
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 10:40 am ¶
AJ Plaid wrote:
@Chris–
::Laughter::
I think people can hold a simultaneous conversation about monogamy as well as polygamy and swinging. Doing the structural breakdown of one type of partner arrangement doesn’t have to take place before talking about other types.
Furthermore, some people on this site may not feel monogamy is inherently oppressive. Some people here, after doing a structural breakdown of monogamy as you suggest, have decided that they quite like the arrangement–they’re quite happy having only one partner, either for a lifetime or at a time. Others feel–again, after doing the structural breakdown that you suggest–that they want to explore the swinging or polyamorous options. (I’m one of them.)
But thanks for the suggestion!
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 11:47 am ¶
Persephone wrote:
Thanks for the background info here — I’m poly and really appreciate you making clear that the post is not about poly-bashing.
The website is, indeed, seriously yuck.
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 1:25 pm ¶
Thea Lim wrote:
Can I just say that I am dying to go to an Afro-Leprechaun cruise? Plz put me on the mailing list!…
Thanks for the great article AJ – unlike Chris I really appreciate being able to come to Racialicious and get intersectional.
As well polygamy (which connotes Christians marrying child brides against their will – fairly or not) is pretty different from polyamory. As you quite clearly stated. Yeesh.
The faux “racial equity” vibe of the copy makes me think that the Crawfords are either white or just severely non-anti-racist. I’m totally with you on the whole “at least race play is honest” vibe – why not just make a cruise for white folks who are dying to get down with POCs is some artificially exotic and cartoony way?
Hm, this may be a good business plan…
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 1:40 pm ¶
Amy wrote:
Fascinating article. I’ve been reading Racialicious for a while, but this is the first piece I’ve felt compelled to comment on (long time listener, first time caller
.
Thank you for writing about polyamory, race play, and racial representations in sex communities. It’s an important topic, and I’m glad to see it here.
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 1:47 pm ¶
Adrianna wrote:
Great article as always AJ ! This reeks of” please come experience sex tourism with the exotic Island and Latin Amican people “to me. And those Jerks co opts voodoo as a magic. WTF. If they really wanted integration that is so the wrong way to go about it.
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 5:26 pm ¶
lovepeaceohana wrote:
Well, that’s fun. I’m polyamorous and yes, there is a terrible dearth of colour in the poly communities I frequent (particularly where they overlap with paganism), but … I’m not seeing how this effort is much of an improvement. It seems to play on all the same stereotypes that plague interracial porn and make it so abhorrent.
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 6:24 pm ¶
Fiqah wrote:
BEAUTIFULLY played, Mizz Plaid! (Especially appreciate the definitions breakdown.) YAY! ::: U.S. Open claps :::
I have to say I’m equal parts disgusted and wearily amused by the “Love Voodoo” (sweet minty Jayzus) approach. AJ, the interracial porn comparison is spot-the-hell-on. The twin conceits that a.) PoC are just waiting desperately for White people to welcome them to the orgy and b.) White people are universally welcome in spaces of color is…well, it’s racist and insulting. Also insulting is the idea that “diversity” has to by definition equal “inclusion of White people.” For example, there’s a LOT of Black-Latino sex communities here in New York City alone that are arguably interracial and diverse, but consist entirely of PoC. Why? Because a lot of Black and Latino swingers got sick of being sexualized, fetishized and objectified along racial lines by the larger swinger community. No one is “exotic” to themselves, damnit. Thea’s right, that “We Are The World, Let’s All Get Down” message is a lotta bullsheist when the neon subtext is “Come See What All The Nappy Brown Dugout Fuss Is About.”
P.S. — Leprechaun Love Connection has potential. There’s be all kinds of fun places to hide the pot of gold.
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 6:31 pm ¶
jvansteppes wrote:
@ Chris: while you might personally find AJ Plaid’s piece to be too ‘niche’, I would counter that there is space at Racialicious for discussions beyond ‘fundamental concepts.’ (And who decides what counts as such?)
Many of us like examining the racial/gendered dynamics at play in different ‘erotic’ or alt-sex communities without having to resort to commentaries by Dan Savage and other clueless columnists. I enjoy being able to refer people to Racialicious when asked about resources on polyamory that take race into account.
Andrea’s articles here are a treat because it’s not too easy finding sex writers with a complex analysis of the power dynamics at play in popular/available sexual culture.
For me, few topics are more fundamental than an Afro-Leprechaun love cruise.
Posted 08 Sep 2009 at 8:21 pm ¶
Kaonashi wrote:
Mmmm…leprechauns. So wiggly and energetic, plus you get the bonus of rainbows afterwards!
Gotta watch out for that fake ass gold though. ~_^
Posted 09 Sep 2009 at 6:25 am ¶
gatamala wrote:
A Chihuahua…with a mustache…and sombrero…
Posted 09 Sep 2009 at 9:18 am ¶
AJ Plaid wrote:
@Thea, Fiqah, Adrianna Persephone, & lovepeace–thanks for the compliments!
@Amy–awww, I’m glad my post inspired you to de-lurk! And I’m glad for the encouragement–it’s good to know Racialicious and I are on the right track with the posts.
@jvansteppes–luvie, how I’ve missed you! Thanks so much for the back-up! And this:
For me, few topics are more fundamental than an Afro-Leprechaun love cruise.
::DEAD::
Kaonashi–Step away from the leprechauns, luvie. They are not put in this realm for you to bother them.
@gatamala–Yes, luvie, yes! And the pinata…and the random chili pepper…and the random cacti…and the logo with the sombrero. As Fiqah would say, “Check, please!”
Posted 09 Sep 2009 at 11:05 am ¶
Paz wrote:
“those silly fake Dread Lock hats for Sombreros!”
Wow. That’s all I got.
Posted 09 Sep 2009 at 1:52 pm ¶
Zahra wrote:
This is a great piece. I like the way you set up non-poly/swinger bashing parameters, and I have to add my adoration for the “Afro-Leprechan Love Cruise.”
A minor point (I realize the spelling comes from quoted material, not your own) but the bisexual community has pretty resoundingly repudiated the hyphenated spelling “bi-sexual.” It’s not hetero-sexual or homo-sexual; why should we be treated differently?
An old but fairly well-know piece on it:
http://whatexit.org/tal/mywritings/how-to-spell-bisexual.html
Posted 09 Sep 2009 at 4:17 pm ¶