Harvard Scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr. Arrested in His Own Home

by Latoya Peterson

From the “This Really Should Have Been on the Chappelle Show” files:

Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr., one of the nation’s pre-eminent African-American scholars, was arrested Thursday afternoon at his home by Cambridge police investigating a possible break-in. The incident raised concerns among some Harvard faculty that Gates was a victim of racial profiling.

After that, the details get sketchy. According to the police report, Gates was arrested for “loud and tumultuous behavior.” The police report appears to have been removed from the original place of upload, but it claimed that Gates continued to to holler about the officer being racist.

However, colleagues like Melissa Harris Lacewell said that the actions described in the police report did not sound like the Skip Gates she knows. On twitter yesterday, she wrote:

I often disagree politically, ideologically, and academically with #SkipGates

But there is no question that #SkipGates is personally responsible for huge investment by Ivy schools into AfAm programs.

#SkipGates is as much an institution builder as a scholar. He is careful, measured, savvy, and a bit of a #trickster.

#SkipGates convinced white multi-millionaires who never cared about black studies before to become patron’s of the field.

#SkipGates vacations in Martha’s Vineyard and “feels at home” in Harvard yard.

My disagreements with #SkipGates have often been fueled by my sense that he underestimates the continuing impact of racism on black life.

So the idea that #SkipGates is standing in his house yelling racially inflammatory things at white cops is really nuts. I do not believe it.

It’s really clear to me that only racist glasses could produce this radical blackity-black vision of #SkipGates.

Indeed, the version of the story Skip Gates released through his lawyer paints a different picture of the course of events:

Professor Gates immediately called the Harvard Real Estate office to report the damage to his door and requested that it be repaired immediately. As he was talking to the Harvard Real Estate office on his portable phone in his house, he observed a uniformed officer on his front porch. When Professor Gates opened the door, the officer immediately asked him to step outside. Professor Gates remained inside his home and asked the officer why he was there. The officer indicated that he was responding to a 911 call about a breaking and entering in progress at this address. Professor Gates informed the officer that he lived there and was a faculty member at Harvard University. The officer then asked Professor Gates whether he could prove that he lived there and taught at Harvard. Professor Gates said that he could, and turned to walk into his kitchen, where he had left his wallet. The officer followed him. Professor Gates handed both his Harvard University identification and his valid Massachusetts driver’s license to the officer. Both include Professor Gates’ photograph, and the license includes his address.

Professor Gates then asked the police officer if he would give him his name and his badge number. He made this request several times. The officer did not produce any identification nor did he respond to Professor Gates’ request for this information. After an additional request by Professor Gates for the officer’s name and badge number, the officer then turned and left the kitchen of Professor Gates’ home without ever acknowledging who he was or if there were charges against Professor Gates. As Professor Gates followed the officer to his own front door, he was astonished to see several police officers gathered on his front porch. Professor Gates asked the officer’s colleagues for his name and badge number. As Professor Gates stepped onto his front porch, the officer who had been inside and who had examined his identification, said to him, “Thank you for accommodating my earlier request,” and then placed Professor Gates under arrest. He was handcuffed on his own front porch.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. same ish, different century « Molecular Shyness on 22 Jul 2009 at 12:11 am

    [...] shouldn’t have been surprised when a friend on facebook posted the story about Henry Louis Gates yesterday.  But I [...]

  2. Why My Protags Aren’t White | Justine Larbalestier on 22 Jul 2009 at 12:16 am

    [...] Questions of representation were not foremost in my mind when I was writing the trilogy. I’m a white girl who grew up in a predominately white country. Thinking about race and representation is something I have to make myself do because my life is not governed negatively by it as others’ lives are, like, say Prof Henry Louis Gates Jr. [...]

  3. Race | Karen Kincy on 23 Jul 2009 at 6:23 pm

    [...] in fiction. I’m flabbergasted by the news that Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. was arrested on the porch of his own home for suspected burglary, even after he showed the police his ID. Ditto [...]

  4. Ain’t That a Shame at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 29 Jul 2009 at 9:01 am

    [...] Clearly we do not live in a post-racist society. But I’d like to think that the publishing world is better than those many anecdotes I’ve been hearing. But for that to happen, all of us—writers, editors, designers, sales reps, booksellers, reviewers, readers, and parents of readers—will have to do better. [...]

  5. Why My Protags Aren’t White at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 06 Aug 2009 at 8:00 am

    [...] Questions of representation were not foremost in my mind when I was writing the Magic or Madness trilogy. I’m a white girl who grew up in a predominately white country. Thinking about race and representation is something I have to make myself do because my life is not governed negatively by it as others’ lives are, like, say Prof Henry Louis Gates Jr. [...]

Comments

  1. Restructure! wrote:

    I bet the cops perceived Professor Gates as “loud”, because he was questioning their authority while being a POC.

  2. atlasien wrote:

    This story is mind-boggling.

    Even if Gates was cursing the officer up and down… so what? Aren’t officers supposed to have thick skin? If they arrested every person that cursed them out, the jails would all break down. How “disorderly” can an elderly man who walks with a cane be? Ugh, obvious questions… obvious racist cop.

    We’ve got a lot of problems with criminals AND police where I live in Atlanta, but I have a feeling something like this would never have happened here.

  3. Beth wrote:

    Living in Boston, yeah, that sounds like the BPD. He’s lucky they didn’t just pull a gun.

  4. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist! wrote:

    I am much more inclined to believe a well-respected, intelligent professor than over a bunch of stupid cops (aka bullies and goons).

    Team Gates!

  5. Amused0472 wrote:

    Boston is a pretty racist place to be for POC. Cambridge usually isn’t as bad because of the large academic community, but if you aren’t dealing with folks from that community and its ideals, things can go downhill real fast.

  6. Joseph Guillermo wrote:

    I just shiver on the fact that some people defend the cop’s decision i.e. http://www.theroot.com/views/lawyers-statement-arrest-henry-louis-gates-jr?page=1.

    C’mon, you don’t arrest a person on grounds that he is irritating (even if he has no grounds to be irritable, which in this case he have every damn one) The cops, without a warrant, are actually being armed thugs stepping on his rights, especially when he had identified himself as the proper resident of that place. They could, should, ought to apologize.

    The good professor ought to sue their asses to kingdom come, this is highly irregular.

    The cop’s decision is Officer Wiggum at its best, 1950 racist at its worst.

  7. A.D. Nix wrote:

    Yeah – the arresting officer really didn’t know who he was messing with. He would have been much better off stomaching whatever earned invective came his way (which was probably no more “tumultuous” than some strongly voiced versions of “how dare you” and “WTF?”) and offering an apology than dealing with the shit storm that I pray reigns down on him and the Cambridge police. But better that it comes out like this.

    How about that neighbor who, upon seeing two black men in their 50s, one of whom carries a cane, with luggage push through a jammed/stuck door in the early afternoon immediately thinks: burglary in progress? Sounds suspiciously like the case of the black professor who was stopped crossing Harvard Yard a few years back because some student reported seeing someone who didn’t look like they belonged at Harvard skulking (i.e. walking) around down there.

    Loud, tumultuous uppity negroes sassing cops when they stomp on their rights. Don’t let them get away with it, Cambridge.

  8. Eva wrote:

    I don’t get this. The cop arrested him for yelling at him? That cop should not be on the force at all if he has such a thin skin.

  9. Crystal wrote:

    My jaw actually dropped when I read this article in the paper this morning. And to think that you have people today saying that the real racism is against white men. Racism against POC is alive and well in the United States. This would have NEVER happened to a famous white professor. NEVER.

  10. BSK wrote:

    I’m a little put off by some of the statements made by his co-worker via Twitter. Does it really matter that Prof. Gates vacations on Martha’s Vineyard and feels at home on the Harvard campus? If he vacationed in Jamacia and felt at home at Howard University, would the officer’s actions be more justified? What if he couldn’t afford a vacation and didn’t feel at home on any college campus? I understand what the colleague was attempting to get at, but I feel it’s just those type of attitudes that exacerbate these situations and their underlying causes.

  11. RMJ wrote:

    BSK, I think that the co-worker was not intending to day that this would have been any less right under those conditions. I think she/he was saying that the HL Gates they know is not one to yell racially inflammatory things just because white people are around – that he is comfortable and used to dealing with white people.

  12. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist! wrote:

    Yeah, I’ve heard that Boston is definitely a very racist city, even though it’s on the East Coast (I’ve always assumed that East Coast cities would be more open minded), until all my Indian friends told me about racist attacks they have endured from white people of Irish origin, screaming hateful words at my friends.

    I live in Missouri (!!!) and rednecks have never openly shouted hateful, racist words at me. For the most part, anyway.

  13. atlasien wrote:

    “How about that neighbor who, upon seeing two black men in their 50s, one of whom carries a cane, with luggage push through a jammed/stuck door in the early afternoon immediately thinks: burglary in progress?”

    Maybe she thought it was a reverse burglary. You know, when people break into houses in order to leave things.

  14. Rachel_in_WY wrote:

    @BSK

    I interpreted Harris-Lacewell’s remarks as support for her claim that the police made false statements about his conduct. Like a sort of “character witness” type of thing. Noting the social habitat of a person can be relevant when there’s a controversy about how they may have acted in a situation.

  15. Black Ivy wrote:

    I can’t get over this on many levels. First, I am currently HLS and also attended Harvard as an undergraduate, and Skip Gates is like, a CELEBRITY around here! I also happen to live about three blocks away and walked by his house on my way home from work yesterday. (There were already several camera crews parked outside). There are only about 3 or 4 residential houses on that street — the rest are apartment buildings. It kills me that some transient renter was probably the one who called the police of one of the few long term, house dwelling residents on the street.

    Furthermore, Skip Gates is notoriously small and frail — he typically walks with a cane or a crutch. Not exactly the intimidating figure the AP cuts him out to be.

    The AP description is a purely biased account of the matter influenced by race colored lenses. The report describes two black males trying to get into a house as if readers are supposed to go “oh ok, I understand now why they should be arrested — there were BLACK GUYS trying to OPEN A DOOR.” Being black does not equate to being suspicious. This technique of raising the issue of blackness to justify a reaction to a situation is used in numerous court opinions. It was used to justify, for example, why a hotel should not be liable for the rape of one of its residents in spite of its lack of security. Eg — “she looked through the peep hole and saw he was black — why on earth would she have let him it? She should have known better! He was black!”

    Skip Gates pulled up in a hired car, was assisted with copious luggage by a driver, (eek! another black man!), and any observer could probably note that he had a key which was jangling as he tried to open the door! The street is not that long or wide and I suspect that the observer could not have been that far away.

    This is very similar to what happened my senior year when a student called the police on the prominent black student group while they were having a field day event on the quad which they had gotten pre approved by a faculty member. This is in spite of the fact that they were all wearing shirts that prominently displayed the name of their group — the Association of Black HARVARD women and the HARVARD Black Mens Forum! http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=518895

    Furthermore, once the police officer arrived, Gates clearly put up some small protest — questioning why he had to show his ID which is well within his rights, but shortly showed the officer TWO forms of identification. FOr some reason, however, the officer called “back up” in the form of the Harvard police department (did he doubt his credentials?) and didn’t leave.

    Even if there was no racism up until this point (which is a ridiculous claim), WHY DIDN”T THE OFFICER LEAVE AFTER HE WAS SHOWN ID!? This was clearly this man’s house! He admits as much in the police report. There is absolutely NO JUSTIFICATION for why the issue didn’t end here outside of racism.

    Instead, the police waited on Gates to leave the house so that he could jump on the opportunity to arrest him. This just makes me sick to my stomach.

    Furthermore, many news sources are simply reporting that he was arrested for being “loud and tumultuous” That is simply the legal standard for disorderly conduct — it likely does not accurately depict the events and is only being used to perpetuate the stereotype of a loud black person “acting out.” What he was really arrested for was rightly challenging the authority of a racist institution. We all know that asserting yourself when black can easily be criminalized.

    What I would really like to see addressed on this site is a discussion of the comments sections on various web sites — including black ones like The Root and Bossip.com. It just makes me sick to my stomach to see so many people justifying what happened here. The reaction seems to be that everyone would be suspicious of a black man trying to get into a nice house — that that suspicion is well grounded! This is OUTRAGEOUS! I have NO DOUBT that if this were a white man who had to jiggle his door a bit to get in while SURROUNDED BY (conjecture) TUMI luggage this wouldn’t have been a problem. Also, had Gates been white, when the police officer arrived he would have said “im sorry to bother you sir but there was a report of a break in, I just need to confirm that you life here,” instead of “step outside.” People are acting as though Gates behavior was unprovoked, but it is very likely that Gates reacted the way he did because of the indignity with which he was approached by the cop. This is SO EGREGIOUS it makes my head spin.

    And can I tell you, I almost had a break down in class when very similar reactions were once voiced in my property law class. We were talking about an anecdote by a black Harvard professor who was not admitted to a “buzz in store,” and several people in my class actually defended the sales girl’s actions because perhaps “the store was closed” (it wasnt, the anecdote clearly mentioned that there were other customers in the store and it was like, 2 in the after noon two weekends before Christmas — prime retail time) or that, get this, she wasn’t dressed “cool enough” to gain admittance to this allegedly trendy store. SHE WAS SHOPPING FOR A SWEATER FOR HER MOTHER IN THE STORY! How trendy could the store have been! I went home and cried because i couldn’t believe that at HARVARD LAW SCHOOL students could be so ignorant and have the audacity to deny racism to my face — to completely invalidate my life experiences! There is a limit to the number of these micro aggressions against my personhood I can take. I really hope Gates crucifies them. This series of events couldn’t be any more perfect. Of course, I thought the same thing about the example put forth in my property class . . .

  16. Some Guy wrote:

    “He is careful, measured, savvy, and a bit of a trickster.” <– Valid observations about the man’s normal behavior and personality attributes. … But doesn’t mean he wouldn’t react differently when thug police officers invade and threaten him in his own home. I’ve seen plenty of examples of normally calm, collected friends and associates totally lose their composure under extreme stress.

    Cops were wrong, regardless. Stupid situation.

  17. A.D. Nix wrote:

    According to Gawker, charges have been dropped. There’s also a pic of the arrest.

    http://gawker.com/5319457/report-charges-dropped-against-henry-louis-gates

  18. Black Ivy wrote:

    Also, have you noticed some sources omit the fact that he was called in by a WHITE woman? Its as though her race is irrelevant in all this — white people are neutral. Only black people could see this situation through a biased lens.

  19. AJ Plaid wrote:

    According to the Boston Herald, the Cambridge police is dropping the charges against Dr. Gates:

    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1186258

    But Dr. Harris-Lacewell brought up a provocative point on Twitter yesterday that’s been on my mind since: Should we care about what happened to Dr. Gates? What she was trying to figure out is, in light of 9 people getting shot in Chicago last Sunday and the media barely picking out the story and Dr. Gates being relatively wealthy, luckily alive, and able to afford a lawyer (who’s also his academic collegue), what class issues may arise among Black people when reacting to these situations. Thoughts?

  20. Black Ivy wrote:

    Also, this happened at 12:44 PM! How come so many comments say “well of course its suspicious if someone is trying to get into a home in the middle of the night.” Last time I checked 12:44 PM was pretty much as close to the brightest point of the day as you can get! People are just reading what they want to hear.

  21. gatamala wrote:

    Dollar will get you a donut those cops felt threatened by and inferior to Dr. Gates.

  22. Wren wrote:

    Massive co-sign @ comment 10!

  23. Queen B wrote:

    I still can’t believe what happened to Gates. Maybe he was angry or bellingerent but so what? Can you imagine-you have just returned from a long flight and all you want to do is come home and crash and some police officer accuses you of breaking into your home knowing at the back your mind that if you were white, nobody would have suspected you of being a burglar.

    As soon as Gates showed his ID, the police should have apologized for the inconvenience and left so Gates being arrested for “disorderly conduct” because he allegedly got a little heated in his home boggles my mind.

    What this incident reinforces is that class, age or education does not make anyone immune from racism. It is no protection from a cop with a chip on his shoulder.

    Lastly, everyone should remember that a police report is not fact and it is not evidence. It is nothing more than officer’s biased characterization of the incident which should be looked at critically.

  24. occhiblu wrote:

    The police have dropped the charges, claiming that “All parties agree that this is a just resolution to an unfortunate set of circumstances.”

    I don’t know about “just” or “resolution.” This seems like minimum human decency to me.

  25. johnjihoonchang wrote:

    *Spoiler*

    You know, when I saw a version of this on HAROLD AND KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE, I thought it was a rather funny joke that an upstanding university professor would be arrested in his own home simply for being black. I thought it was an exaggeration of the racism that happens in real life and that’s why it was funny. Apparently, that segment was more prophetic than exaggerated.

  26. Black Ivy wrote:

    Another thing is that commentors keep writing “why didn’t he give them the ID.” He DID give them his ID.

    The articles are also written as though HLG started with the racial comments without any provocation from the police. From Gates’ own rendition: “When Professor Gates opened the door, the officer immediately asked him to step outside. ”

    Like I said above, this is probably not how a well dressed, handicapped, middle class, professorial white man would have been addressed.

    Also, the police report (which has now been taken down but which I can email to Racialicious if they didn’t download it earlier), says that he was arrested because of his tumultuous behavior INSIDE HIS OWN HOUSE which was “loud” due to the “acoustics” of his own kitchen. I didn’t know that it was disturbing the peace to raise your voice in your own kitchen. Gates also allegedly continued to be “tumultuous” as the cop walked outside the house and he could be overheard by those around him. Let me tell you, if there are more that 3 people on that street on any given minute of any given day I would be shocked. No peace was disturbed except for the cops own self serving belief that he was not racist.

  27. Nina wrote:

    The neighbor who called the police on Gates is a fundraiser for the Harvard Magazine and she did not recognize Gates as one of the most high profile professors of Harvard AND her neighbor? Oh that’s right all black folks look alike. And by look alike I mean look like criminals. And I agree with all those above who argue that there were no real grounds to arrest Gates.

    This story reminds me of something that happened to a white male friend….he went to his grandparents house and used his keys to enter. They were not home and had a silent alarm system that he had no idea he had set off. He was in the house when police arrived. They asked who he was, he told them, showed them pictures of himself throughout the house and then called his grandparents to get the code to shut off the alarm. That was it. No arrest, no harsh words exchanged, nothing. A misunderstanding handled civily by the police who treated my friend with respect not suspicion, from the start. There were no threats, no “we need you to step outside” nothing. If the police had accorded Gates the same respect this would have still been an eye-rolling affair (can’t believe the neighbors called the cops) but nothing on this level.

  28. DCBred wrote:

    @BSK

    I think what she was getting at is that Gates has made himself at “home” in largely upscale, white communities… because it is his home. He is not the stereotypical “burglar” or someone who would appear or feel “out of place” in the neighborhood he lives in, the school where he works or other places where any other Black person would be deemed suspicious. So the cops (or other people in those communities) shouldn’t have any reason to feel threatened by him… but still, they did. And that’s because it was not a class issue, it was a race issue.

  29. Amused0472 wrote:

    @ Black Ivy–Just imagine sitting in Professor Nesson’s evidence class and listening to him argue, while playing the video of the Rodney King video, how you could justify the police actions in that case.

  30. gueralola wrote:

    @Crystal I agree 100%
    It scary the fact Boston is known for such an intellectual city is so racist. You would think it would be more open minded to poc

  31. JL wrote:

    According to his lawyer, Gates has a lung infection that is impairing his breathing. If that’s so, how on earth did he “yell” anything? What constitutes “yelling” to these cops?

    True story about Cambridge and race: A few years ago, when I was an undergrad at a university in Cambridge (not Harvard), our campus police stopped an Arab-American friend of mine for…carrying a roll of duct tape while walking across campus. They thought he looked “suspicious”. They let him go after he produced his student ID and answered questions about where he was going, but I never did figure out what they thought he was going to DO with the duct tape.

  32. JL wrote:

    @several people

    While it doesn’t really bear on the story itself, keep in mind that Boston and Cambridge are not the same place. They are two separate, though adjacent, cities, with very different cultures.

    Sorry for being so pedantic, but I keep seeing comments about Boston this or Boston that, and thinking “But Cambridge isn’t Boston!” Though, given that Cambridge prides itself on being Happy Liberal Intellectual Land (which Boston doesn’t really), it could do with looking at this story and noticing that there’s, um, trouble in “paradise”. Of course, if they spent less time patting themselves on the back for being liberal, they would have noticed already that there are problems in the Cambridge PD.

    The mayor of Cambridge is a black woman – I wonder if she’s had any…interesting…encounters with the Cambridge PD. For that matter, I wonder what she had to SAY when she heard about this arrest.

  33. Amused0472 wrote:

    I meant while “while playing the video of the Rodney King beating”

  34. PPR_Scribe wrote:

    Yes, it is an outrage that this could happen to someone like Dr. Gates. Yes, it is infuriating that the police should drop charges in such a way to suggest that the mistakes were on all sides.

    But it is also important to note that if the situation were different, we may not have even heard of this case at all. *That* is truly outrageous.

    I lived in the Boston area during the Charles Stuart case. There were probably hundreds of Black men of all ages who were rounded up and searched and assumed capable of the murder that Stuart himself committed. Yet–besides my own friends who this happened to–I do not know any of these men’s names.

    As a middle class, middle aged Black American I can sense what is behind a lot of the outrage in this case: not that it happened *at all* to *anyone*, but that it could happen to someone like me. Some Black folks deserve this kind of treatment and others of us do not.

    This is really a dangerous belief–that our education and credentials and “playing by the rules” will exempt us from being just another n***** in some people’s eyes.

  35. Black Ivy wrote:

    @ Amusedo472

    Reall? Damn. But his wiki page makes him seem so down :)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Nesson

  36. Amused0472 wrote:

    This article indicates that one of the police reports said Gates said “your mama” during the incident.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a0HQm9Lw29Ig

    Now that sounds like some made up ish to me. I can’t imagine Gates using “your mama” in a sentence even in a heated situation. I also often laugh at the way he pronounces ghetto in his documentaries like he’s ordering tea and crumpets. This is the most formal and straight-laced black man that you will ever meet. Shame on those officers.

  37. PPR_Scribe wrote:

    BTW, I have been unable to access links to the police report for the last hour or so. It seems they may have been disabled. If anyone has access to a cached copy, please share. Thanks!

  38. khia213 wrote:

    The latest report says the charges are being dropped. Cnn.com

  39. Beth wrote:

    @AJ Plaid
    I think it is certainly telling that this is the story that is getting air, but I’d say the story of the Black NY cop shot by a White NY cop is an even more telling example. There if he hadn’t been a cop not only would it have not gotten air play, but the White cop would have been seen as doing *the right thing*.

    People will always try to rationalize these incidents away, just like we can see in the comments across the web right now. From what I can see, the harder it is to Other the person the fewer rationalizations seem to stick. Each time a newspaper editor can rationalize why a racist police action was really justified and ignores it, it gets silenced. Without those excuses, the chance that the conversation is derailed before it happens.

    Is it right? No. Can it be a productive opportunity to challenge a murderous system of privilege? I hope so.

  40. Marcus Kwame wrote:

    Many of us grew up with the lesson that if you’re a person of color you have to be twice as good to get half the recognition. I’ve found this to be true in my life, and Prof. Gates’ arrest proves that even if you climb the ivy league ladder, write countless books, articles etc., and achieve great things, many people will still only see you as a criminal.

    “Post-racial” America, huh? Same old story.

  41. BSK wrote:

    At Rachel and RMJ-

    I didn’t read it that way, but it certainly makes sense and is not troublesome given that interpretation. Thanks for an alternative thought.

    DCBred-

    This is exactly the type of thought process I found troubling. You said that he took those steps and, therefore, no one should have any reason to feel threatened by him. But, suppose he hadn’t taken those steps. Then would it have been appropriate to feel threatened by him? Someone should not have to vacation on Martha’s Vineyard and actively work to make himself feel at home on Harvard’s campus to avoid being deemed a threat. Must all the white professors take these steps to be deemed “safe”? Prof. Gates did nothing to warrant himself being considered a threat outside of being black. It should not matter where he vacations or how comfortable he feels on campus; claiming that these things do matter implies that, absent them, it is appropriate to deem him a threat.

    This reminds me of a situation where a white girl I knew was involved in an interracial relationship. Her parents had major issues with hit. Her response? “Well, his parents are doctors.” I was appalled.

    This seems like much the same thing, if interpreted as DCBred and I (initially) had. I hope that Rachel and RMJ’s interpretation is the more accurate one, but obviously, this is a line of thinking held by many.

  42. AJ Plaid wrote:

    Here is an interview Dr. Gates gave to the Washington Post, who also owns The Root, which Gates founded:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/21/AR2009072101771_pf.html

  43. Paulinesgd wrote:

    For legal reasons I have to stay anonymous, but I am a close insider into this case. I can say that for Gates, one of the hardest parts of being arrested has been the sense of betrayal he is feeling. I’m not sure that I know anyone who has put more faith into the American justice system than Henry Gates. I know from experience that he is the first to call on the city police at the first hint of danger, the first to thank an officer for their help, and truly valued the sense of safety that came from his good relationship with law enforcement. Not only is Gates furious and hurt that Sargeant Crowley’s behavior was outrageous on Thursday afternoon, he feels betrayed by the very people he believed were on his side.

    @ Black Ivy–THANK YOU! I agree 100% that more attention needs to be paid to people’s comments about this story. I’m grateful that this site has reasonable commenters who are aware that Crowley’s police report was written with more than an hint of bias as he was trying to cover up his own mistake, a mistake which was VERY clear by the time he made it back to the station.

    @Nina–not only do all us black people look alike, all black people look like black men “with backpacks,” aka threatening thugs. Have you ever seen Gates? He’s 5′5, 58 years old, balding and grey, with a cane and a pronounced limp. On the porch with a Boston Coach driver and expensive luggage. At 1 pm in broad daylight. With his keys, which he had opened his back door with. That description is certainly worthy of a panicked 911 call, right?

  44. Kaonashi wrote:

    Typical disgusting Boston cop behaviour. I hope that Gates doesn’t let this issue drop and someone loses their job over it. The instant they knew it was his house they should have apologized and LEFT.

    Gatamala: I think you’re right. They probably arrested him because he used big words they couldn’t understand.

  45. jen* wrote:

    Every time I read something about this story it pisses me off. I don’t even know if I have something useful to say – I just know that just about the same thing happened to my Dad at a property he was working on a couple weeks ago – up until the arrest. He was just followed around the place while he went to get his ID. And then followed out to his car, to prove that it’s his.

    It just hurts. To *keep* having to be reminded that no matter how much good you do in your life – no matter how old you are – you’re still going to be treated like crap. I’m just tired.

  46. N wrote:

    White people read black and latinos as “violent” and any irritation or indignation, even when one is angry at having been victimized, is read as “escalation”. If you get angry, or frown, or refuse to be utterly and totally calm, then its taken as a sign that you are about to go buck wild.

    Poor Sotomayor had to chill at her hearings for that very reasons, minority excitement of any sort seems to be confused with anger, and black or latin anger = violence to many.

    I’ve dealt with female victims of domestic violence and I tell them, no matter how bruised and battered and angry you are, you had better lie down and cry and weep. If you speak angrily you will be seen as the aggressor or at least as having provoked the aggression. Law enforcement cant seem to NOT see certain people that way,

    Damn shame.

  47. cocolamala wrote:

    also gates wrote “the signifying monkey” which analyzed, among other things, the dozens. so i can certainly picture him saying “yo mama” he probably relished saying it! lmao!

    there might be a link to the report still up at gawker.

  48. Tamara wrote:

    “The neighbor who called the police on Gates is a fundraiser for the Harvard Magazine and she did not recognize Gates as one of the most high profile professors of Harvard AND her neighbor?”

    EXACTLY!!!!!!!! Dr. Gates is not only a major scholar at Harvard, but around the world! He’s been on At first I tried to give the woman the “benefit of the doubt”. Maybe she’s new to the area or not affiliated with the unviersity, etc. But knowing that she’s a Harvard employee and fundraiser???? Why were the cops called in the first place?

  49. Sean wrote:

    Sheesh, who was the woman who reported a burglary? Ashley Todd?

  50. c.n. edaw wrote:

    “White people read black and latinos as “violent” and any irritation or indignation, even when one is angry at having been victimized, is read as “escalation”. If you get angry, or frown, or refuse to be utterly and totally calm, then its taken as a sign that you are about to go buck wild.”

    This to me is at the heart of this issue. It is where white people don’t see their own racism and POC experience it every day of their lives in insignificant and significant ways. It’s the behavioral double standard which most white people, sadly don’t see as racist or one of its symptoms.

    I’ve been in the car with my white male boyfriends when they’ve been stopped by the police. I’ve seen them be downright condescending to the officers, get snarky, angry, even curse. No one has ever hauled them off to jail. Sure they’ve paid some hefty tickets, but no one asks them to step out of the car…even with ME beside them, LOL!.

    And if that cop (or other authority figure) is in the wrong, they trip all over themselves apoligizing.

    I live and report in the South. I have seen white people (rather poor ones, mind you) come out on their porches with shotguns point them at local police and then tell them to leave them alone and get off their property until they’ve got a warrant. And all the white people around them clap and cheer this type of police defiance.

    When POC can do this and get the same response and not get shot is the day I will think we have turned a page.

    When a POC can act the same way as white men in any given set of circumstances and not be subject to this behavioral double standard that’s when I’ll say racism might be close to being eradicated.

    If those cops can’t truly say they would have treated a white man (professor or not) in the same manner given the same set of circumstances then I think there’s a problem.

  51. ashlynn wrote:

    Open and shut case, Johnson. Sprinkle some crack on him!

  52. BSK wrote:

    This reminds me of the story involving Ryan Moats from earlier this year (or perhaps last year). Moats ran a red light attempting to get to the hospital to say goodbye to his dying mother-in-law. The officer detained him for several minutes outside, despite Moats’ respectful explanation of what was happening and cooperation with the police. The officer made threats to him and ignored dispatches radio relay that the hospital needed Moats inside. As cn edaw pointed out, how different would any of these situations have been had the person in question been white? I am white and have experienced what he described during traffic stops. I’m almost tempted to insist that the officer do more, attempting to refuse the white privilege being bestowed upon me.

  53. Sean wrote:

    Incidenatally, this year also marks the 20th anniversary of the Charles Stewart case. I guess the BPD has to make national news every 20 years or so. Welcome to so called, “post-racial” America.

  54. Lxy wrote:

    What’s also interesting about this incident are the (predictable) dismissals from some people like on the Boston Globe comment section below:

    Here we go. Let’s blow this out of all proportion. Let’s not wait until we hear the full story….bring on the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton circus.

    Posted by johnpaul July 20, 09 02:07 PM.

    Enough of throwing down the race card … we have a Black President now, so that tired old ship has sailed. The guy got indignant like any self-important Harvard professor does, pulled the old “Do you know who I am?” routine, and got arrested as a result.

    Posted by Dave C. July 20, 09 02:13 PM

    http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/07/harvard.html

  55. Baiskeli wrote:

    @Deaf Indian Muslim Arnachist


    Yeah, I’ve heard that Boston is definitely a very racist city, even though it’s on the East Coast (I’ve always assumed that East Coast cities would be more open minded), until all my Indian friends told me about racist attacks they have endured from white people of Irish origin, screaming hateful words at my friends.

    I live in Missouri (!!!) and rednecks have never openly shouted hateful, racist words at me. For the most part, anyway.

    Yes it is, I could tell you stories. I’ve been called the N-word multiple times and the last one was some townies who took offense to the fact that I was walking with a white woman (my wife) and challenged me to a fight (ironically, it was the night of my birthday when my wife had taken me out to dinner in our Somerville neighborhood. Due to the Red Sox game there had been an influence of townies).

    I used to live in the next town over (Somerville) and to be honest, there are both pretty decent places. Just one thing, watch out for the cops. The cops (to some extent, mostly working class old school Irish, think the busing riots) resent the ‘uppity’ minorities. I suspect this was one cop who flew off the handle when challenged by someone they considered beneath them (based on skin color).

    Boston and the surrounding communities can be hard for minorities. Just when you are getting familiar and comfortable because your immediate circle is somewhat familiar you get smacked in the face when you come crashing into the real Boston.

  56. NancyP wrote:

    Let’s say you have no idea that this person is a celebrity, and you don’t recognize him. Gates is obviously graying. What rational person is going to think “thief” when looking at a prosperous middle-aged to older man of any color? The demographics are against it – the great majority of property and stranger-assault crimes are committed by men under 40. Another point about one-second glance “profiling” (which is done by everyone, even if subconsciously). Even if Gates wore his tackiest sweats through the flight (which I doubt), you can still “read” posture, age, quality of clothing (a worn-out Brooks Brother shirt still looks like a BB shirt), accessories (such as a piece of luggage?), etc. Now what I *might* consider when seeing an older man trying to force a door is the possibility of domestic violence to a spouse or child within – but duh, why the luggage?

    multiple fail

  57. kerrita k wrote:

    ah. so, are we post-race yet? **tongue-firmly-in-cheek** i am dying to hear from this ridiculously ignorant neighbor. what is her deal? and how could she? what a revelation. i wonder what the next block party will be like?
    -kerrita k

  58. x0x wrote:

    Charges were dropped, dunno if that was noted yet though.

  59. Kaonashi wrote:

    The more I think about this, the angrier I get.

    The woman who initially called in the first place obviously had less than altruistic motives.

  60. DreaD wrote:

    PPR_Scribe,

    Word and Word. Right on. Let’s not fail to realize that class mediates racism for middle to upper class POCs. This excuses nothing, of course. But Gates sure did get his “N***** Wake Up Call”, as Paul Mooney would say.

  61. DreaD wrote:

    @ashlynn….that Dave Chappelle bit came to my mind also…who woulda known it’s too true.

  62. Princezz wrote:

    This is quite unfortunate and what’s most mind blowing is that an armed police officer believed it was standard operating procedure to come into a person’s home, repeatedly refuse to provide his name and badge number, and have a posse of other officers help him arrest an innocent man on his front porch after the man has cooperated and provided identification and proof of residency. Wow!

    Yes, Dr. Gates is Harvard scholar, professor, author and more, yet he is human. He was supposed to yell and call the officers out on this racist crap since he was violated, unfairly profiled and his rights have definitely been violated.

    In this case, I believe at some point the officers had already determined who Dr. Gates was, but decided to arrest him anyway simply because they felt they had the power and right to so. In other words, “We don’t care about you or your credentials and we automatically view you as a potentially dangerous Black man.”

    Will this ever stop?

  63. merq wrote:

    I’m with everyone who thinks the real tragedy is the reaction from commenters to the story.

    I spent about five to 10 minutes reading a few versions of the story yesterday, and another HOUR reading the comments on sites like Gawker. I tell you, as jaded as I am (7-year MMW/Racialicious veteran here), I wanted to throw up.

    Like one of the more decent Gawker commenters said:
    “White people are so tired of having to hear about racism. Imagine how tired those experiencing it are.”

    Our president is black. Woo-muthafuckin-hoo.

  64. atlasien wrote:

    @merq: the best response is to ridicule and laugh at the stupidity of the comments.

    If I didn’t do that, I’d probably start crying instead.

    I can note one point of optimism, however. Perhaps the blame-Gates crowd is loudest in part because people who disagree with them are repelled from posting. Once you have more than two or three comments in a row of racist spew, that poisons the atmosphere. The average commenter who disagrees thinks, “what’s the point of arguing with these troglodytes? I can’t risk my blood pressure and sanity on this mess.” But it doesn’t work the other way around, at least not without comment moderation (thank goodness for the moderation here at Racialicious).

  65. EvilAngelfish wrote:

    Count me as one of those becoming more and more disgusted with every story I read about this incident. All the apologism just makes me want to vomit. I’ve seen so many comments chastising Gates for not giving the cops the benefit of the doubt: cops are stressed, cops are just doing their job; he should have just been respectful, polite, perfectly cooperative, showing no sign of frustration, Harvard profs are pompous and self-important anyway, he’s a race scholar, of course he was screaming that they were racists, etc. etc. Where’s the benefit of the doubt for Gates? And seriously cops, a broad daylight break in by a frail, graying man? Open and shut, I guess.

    I’m sick to death of this type of brainless arrest/shoot first, ask questions (and issue grudging apologies) later policing. It makes me feel distinctly UNSAFE. Every time I read a story like this, I can’t help but think of my dad or my brother or my cousins, and no that no matter how upstanding, law-abiding or harmless-looking they are, they’ll never get the benefit of the doubt. The first instinct is still clutch the purse and call the cops.

    @merq
    that Gawker comment made me think of the comments at NYTimes – so many people wrote that they were tired of hearing about people whining about race, making a big deal out of nothing, etc. I wanted to counter, ‘You know why you’re so sick of hearing about these things? Because people experience things like this all the time!’

  66. EvilAngelfish wrote:

    @65 “…and *know* that no matter…”
    So frustrated, I mistyped.

  67. [dave] wrote:

    Yeah the comments on Gawker et al make me want to throw up.

  68. Joyce wrote:

    Whether you agree with Gates’ politics/scholarship or not, the fact remains that the man did not get where he is today without knowing how to act in any and all situations.
    The man is no fool.

    So, I think this event just goes to show:
    Post-race America, my white ass.

  69. terry wrote:

    The police were called to his house because of a reported burglary.They did not know who this man was. So sad that people who are just doing their job should be subjected to abuse. Politeness and manners cost nothing.

  70. Montclair Mommy wrote:

    @ terry, I’m sorry, but I feel like you should take your police sympathizing elsewhere when it comes to this issue. Did you even read the article? Do you know someone who would be polite and mannered when they were accused of breaking into their own home? I’m sure you’ve had trouble getting into your home one time or another (locked out, door jammed, using the wrong key in the dark, couldn’t find your keys) and I can go ahead and bet that you didn’t get the cops called on you. This was an older, respected man with a cane and luggage going home to his house. The person who called the police was a moron, obviously, but once the cops got there they should have:

    1. Noted that the man was almost 60 and handicapped.
    2. Noted that the man was already in his home AND he answered the damn door. What kind of burglar answers the door to the police “Yes, I am currently stealing everything in here, but can I help you?”
    3. Realized that this was obviously a mistake. Notice that I am not even expecting the police to be smart enough to realize that this man was famous. Time magazine famous, even. I am not expecting that. Blue collar workers, maybe not the brightest, fine. Didn’t know. Fine. But still. Next step:
    4. Apologized. “Sorry sir, but we have protocol and someone reported a burglary. We’re sorry to have to do this but can we see some proof that you live here?” The apologetic nature is key. This isn’t too much to ask. The same thing happened to a friend of mine when he had to break into his house through a back window (but he was white. Alas.)
    5. Now, once the good Professor got a little peeved at this, for valid reason mind you, the cops should have again, been apologetic. Obviously, at this point they should have noted due to 1 and 2 observations that this was a mistake. They have to follow protocol but they don’t have to be assholes to do it. They should say, “I understand it seems ridiculous sir, but we’re just doing our jobs here. Just cooperate and we’ll be on our way.”
    6. Once he showed his ID, they should have left. Period. Even if he was irate they should have just been like, “again, just doing our jobs, we’ll leave now” and left. I highly doubt he would have been that angry if they were so apologetic to start with. I bet he would have complied very easily and been upset at the insult, but not upset at the rudeness of the police.

    I just feel like this is very simple. The police were thinking, “Who does this Black guy think he is to get upset with us? Who does he think he’s talking to? He thinks he’s better than us??” and they wanted to show him a lesson. People of working class status that are white often seem to feel upset when confronted by educated Black people in power. They would never have behaved this way if the identical scenario unfolded with an older white professor. Never. It would never happen. I hope Gates takes it to them.

  71. Brandon wrote:

    No, Terry. The “just doing their job” defense won’t cut it here. If you’re the police and you go into someone’s home to investigate a burglary charge, you have to EXPECT that the person might just be a little bit agitated. If the police come into my home some evening, THEY are the ones who have some explaining to do, not ME.

  72. Phil Deeze wrote:

    @ Terry #69:
    Are you frickin’ KIDDING me? No white person would take this sort of treatment from a black cop, bottom line. Why? Because there’s consequences for black cops that harass innocent white people.
    There’s no reason that Gates should’ve tolerated this from a public servant. Remember the motto “to protect and serve.” All that racist police officer did was NOT protect and serve. If an officer dispenses his duties in a manner unbecoming, it’s a citizens job to report it.
    Terry, this situation probably will keep that same cop from doing what he did to Gates to someone else.

  73. Sean wrote:

    Thanks for that, Montclaire Mommy. However, you might be expeting too much. I mean, when freakin’ LENNY KRAVITZ is mistaken for a bank robber…

    Anyway, should you decide to try for police commisioner, you have my full support.

  74. Terry wrote:

    Montclair Mommy

    @The person who called the police was a moron, obviously.

    Surely you can’t be serious. If a neighbour saw someone breaking into your house, wouldn’t you want them to call the police?

    As for “don’t you know who I am” Mr Gates, it obvious he got upset at mere policeman questioning a Harvard professor.

  75. Montclair Mommy wrote:

    @ Terry, I think you should READ the article first. This is key. Would I want to be neighbors with someone who would suspect someone of being a robber merely due to the color of their skin? No. That person might just call the police on my husband or son if they couldn’t get the door open on the first try. Or, a more apt comparison, my father-in-law, despite his age. I don’t want any neighbor like this woman. I would want someone with a) real powers of observation b) some sense.

    As he should get upset at the police questioning him! See @ Brandon’s comment above and also a thousand others. I’d be upset too! I’m in MY home with MY keys that I used to get into MY home. You had better be pretty solicitous if you are going to accuse me of robbing a house using keys and bringing in luggage. As many have said, what kind of robbery is that?

  76. Morpho wrote:

    It’s like the Dave Chappelle joke where the two white officers respond to a robbery call at his house. He answers the door, they assume it’s him and knock him out before asking any questions.

    One of the Officers: “Open and shut case, Johnson! I’ve seen this sort of thing before. Apparently this n— broke in and hung pictures of his family everywhere.”

  77. Fiqah wrote:

    @ashlynn @Morpho: Love, love, LOVE you both for referencing this Chappelle joke. Sad but true.

  78. jen* wrote:

    Thanks Morpho – I needed that laugh. The comments about this incident are seriously incendiary.

  79. Lxy wrote:

    I’m with everyone who thinks the real tragedy is the reaction from commenters to the story.

    Yes.

    Henry Louis Gates was arrested by the police for breaking into his own house, and for some people … it’s the police who are the victim!

    Unbelievable.

  80. John Parker wrote:

    I’m convinced this isn’t racism, and I”ll tell you why. One time, I accidently set off my home alarm and didn’t know I had, so I didn’t answer the phone when the alarm company called to see if everything was ok.

    Just for clarification, I’m white, and the responding police officers were both white. When they arrived, I told them what had happened, then they told me to get my ID showing the address was mine. Once I showed it to them, they let their guard down a bit, and I apologized for wasting their time.

    If I became belligerent, insulting, and uncooperative the way this man did, I would have expected to be arrested.

    The fact that the officer decided to arrest him knowing very well that he would have to defend himself against racial profiling tells me that racism wasn’t a motivating factor for him.

  81. David Lopez wrote:

    For me, Queen Bee really summarized it: “I still can’t believe what happened to Gates. Maybe he was angry or bellingerent but so what? Can you imagine-you have just returned from a long flight and all you want to do is come home and crash and some police officer accuses you of breaking into your home knowing at the back your mind that if you were white, nobody would have suspected you of being a burglar.”

    I, too, have been seeing all of the comments that say, “he should just have kept cool.” I am a card carrying pacifist, but if I was getting the third degree from a cop for “breaking into” my own house, even after showing ID, I would have found it very difficult to keep my cool.

    And, Black Ivy, I, too, have had a tough time reading all the comments that say: “this could have happened to anyone.” Sad ironic laughter. I would like to see all of the police reports of older rich white men getting arrested for “disorderly conduct” after their similarly affluent white neighbor called 911 to report a break in by a polished white man in a suite accompanied by his contracted driver, also in a suit, carrying his designer luggage. Come on, people.

  82. DCBred wrote:

    @BSK

    I don’t think she’s condoning or defending it, but just explaining the reality as it is. In DC, Georgetown’s city council member told the media that if you see blacks in the area then they’re suspect because it’s unusual to see Blacks there (which is not at all true). I lie to you not. This is how people think. Is that right? no. But that’s the country we live in.

  83. atlasien wrote:

    “The fact that the officer decided to arrest him knowing very well that he would have to defend himself against racial profiling tells me that racism wasn’t a motivating factor for him.”

    Wow… I love this logic.

    The fact that my son decided to steal a cookie from the cookie jar knowing very well that he would have to defend himself against parental charges of cookie theft tells me that, um, the Cookie Monster made him do it.

  84. John Parker wrote:

    “The fact that my son decided to steal a cookie from the cookie jar knowing very well that he would have to defend himself against parental charges of cookie theft tells me that, um, the Cookie Monster made him do it.”

    No, your son took the cookie thinking he wouldn’t get caught. After the allegations of racism by Dr. Gates, the officer knew damn well he’d raise a stink.

    If you mouth off to a cop too much, you get arrested no matter who you are. A police officer who isn’t racist wouldn’t consider the man’s race to be a factor. It’s entirely possible that the officer didn’t make the decision to NOT arrest him simply because he’s black.

  85. Feminazi wrote:

    Oh John Parker,

    …as a fellow white person, you sadden me.

    1. You cannot seriously compare your experiences as a white male to the experiences of a black male. It’s apples and oranges.

    2. Fun fact: mouthing off to the police isn’t a crime. “Disorderly conduct” requires some sort of public disturbance. The Dr. Gates was in his home; not in the middle of the street, disturbing his neighbors, but *possibly* saying some unflattering things to a cop- IN HIS HOME. The cop lured Gates onto his front porch so that they could arrest him for some made up charge.

    If you don’t get that, then you’re beyond hope.

  86. G.K wrote:

    I read the article, and if everything happened the way Prof. Gates said it happened (and he has no reason to lie about ANY of this, mind you) if he was already in his own home, showed his ID and everything to prove it was his home, why,even after ALL that, did the policeman still feel the need to call for backup? I’m sorry, but if that happened to me, I’d be mad as hell too and going off on the policeman,especially if I wasn’t doing a damn thing wrong. So what if Prof. Gates went off on the officer—all the officer had to do was apologize and leave. Why should Gates have had to kiss his behind just because he was a policeman, seeing as he was being followed in his own home and wasn’t caught doing ANYTHING wrong, mind you. And why was he arrested in the first place—exactly what the hell was he charged with—breaking and entering in his OWN home? How was THAT even justified in the first place?

    And how does getting mad and shouting at a policeman constitute a threat to begin with? Helll, if the police went around arresting everybody who yelled at them, the jails would be too crammed with people.

    Another thing–how come it didn’t occur to the caller that Prof. Gates actually lived there–she obviously didn’t know that, and didn’t bother to find out before jumping the gun and calling the police. Also, what robber in his/her right mind is going to break into a house in broad daylight where everybody can see them, I mean gimme a damn break. If she didn’t know who lived there, why the hell didn’t she bother to go out and ask him, instead of just assuming that he had to be robbing the place—as if a black person couldn’t possible be living there to begin with?

    @ Terry & John Parker:

    Just to let you know—this is nothing unusual to black folks—14 years ago when a young black man moved to Warren, MI–north of 8 Mile here in the Detroit metro area (which used to be a truly racist area for the few black people that lived there at the time) bought a house and was doing some work in his own front yard when he found himself suddenly surrounded by policeman with guns drawn. He asked cautiously what the matter was, and was told that there had been a report of a robbery at this house. To make a long story short, he had some racist neighbors who called the police, lied and said that he was robbing the place,even though they did in fact know that he lived there. He took them to court and they got charged with filing a false report–sadly, he ended up moving because the incident shook him, plus he had a child to worry about. Bottom line, these things DO happen to black people all the damn time—I don’t care how much you want to dismiss and say that it has nothing to do with race, that’s BS—I guarantee you if Prof. Gates was white, he wouldn’t have even been arrested. I hope he sues the living hell out of the police department, that’s all I can say!

  87. Asianlawyer wrote:

    Look I’m with the officer on this one. Racial profiling and other forms of institutional racism in the criminal justice system is an unfortunate and indisputable fact. However, this circumstance is not a good example of it. Prof. Gates was the one behaving like a jackass here.

    First the officer had probable cause to investigate the break in due to a neighbor’s report. I should hope the police would respond to such a report in a serious manner.

    Second after Prof. Gates established his identity he continued to yell at the officer and accuse him of racism while asking for the name and badge number of the officer….

    Third Prof. Gates was yelling so loudly that he did not hear the officer give the requested information three times.

    Fourth Prof. Gates continued to yell at the officer and followed him as he was leaving the house.

    Fifth, Prof. Gates was arrested for disorderly conduct, not breaking and entering while OUTSIDE his home.

    And yes I know most of this information is derived from the police report. However Prof. Gates did not dispute that he followed the officer outside and was arrested OUTSIDE, not for breaking and entering but for disorderly conduct. Essentially when the officer left the house, implictly acknowledging that he made a mistake, Gates still would not let the issue go. I happen to think the officer behaved with the utmost professionalism in this situation.

  88. atlasien wrote:

    Sigh… my son is much smarter than that.

    It’s possible to be smart enough to know that you’ll get caught, but impulsive enough that you do it anyway. In fact, it’s not just possible, it’s the general rule of things.

    “If you mouth off to a cop too much, you get arrested no matter who you are.”

    Pure fantasy. When I was in college I saw quite a few drunk, high white kids mouthing off to cops without consequence. Other times they paid for it, but a lot of times they didn’t. Other kinds of students were a lot more judicious and polite because they knew they wouldn’t get as much latitude.

    “It’s entirely possible that the officer didn’t make the decision to NOT arrest him simply because he’s black.”

    You seem to be doing a 540-degree reversal here.

  89. Jessica wrote:

    @ John Parker

    I think a key factor is that you’re white (and yes it does make a difference. White John Parker and Black John Parker will always be treated differently, ALWAYS!). Of course they wouldn’t automatically be on guard for you but when it’s a black man and you show TWO id’s (a state id and Harvard staff id) and the police still aren’t satisfied you might get a bit upset. This man grew up in the 60’s and has a different life story then you and he felt that he was being treated unfairly and that’s why he asked for the officer’s badge number (which you are allowed to do and is not considered belligerent and uncooperative) but the officer repeatedly refused (now that’s uncooperative). Gates was then asked to come outside and was arrested (with half the Cambridge Police in his yard). Some reports are saying that “your mama” phrase was involved but that could easily be false.

    Now I’m trying to figure out how that was not racism. I have a feeling if this was White Henry Gates all of this would not have transpired. Period.

  90. Jessica wrote:

    @ Asianlawyer,

    That police report can be completely fabricated. The police officer can write whatever he wants and people like you will assume everything they write is true. The charges were dropped so swiftly because they know they were completely in the wrong.

  91. John Parker wrote:

    @Feminazi: It’s not disputed that he was disturbing the peace. And I didn’t compare my experience to that of a black man. I compared my experience of a cooperative citizen to one who clearly was not. Identifying people at the scene is an integral part of any police investigation. They asked me for my ID as they asked him for his. Dr. Gates was offended because he’s black and he assumed racism. I was not offended when asked for mine. The point I’m making is that he wasn’t asked for his ID because he’s black.

    @G.K.: The story of the gentlemen whose racist neighbors faked the police report to harass him saddens me, as it was clearly a racist act on behalf of his neighbors.

  92. ktrujillo wrote:

    Prof. Gates was the one behaving like a jackass here…..

    ******

    If behaving like a jackass was a crime worthy of arrest, entire states would have to be converted to penitentiaries.

    I lived for several years in Cambridge and I can tell you that most Harvard professors act like jackasses…daily… and yet I haven’t read of anyone else being arrested for acting the ass. Everyone knows who the high profile profs are…it’s not a mystery…since they announce it everywhere they go! I was attached to a nearby (and vastly superior) technical institute and even I knew.
    People are lashing out at Professor Gates because his experience undermines their post-racial America fantasy.

  93. Feminazi wrote:

    @ John Parker,
    How was Gates uncooperative? He gave the guy the ID he asked for. That should have been the end of it.
    AND I don’t think anyone is arguing that he was initially upset AT the officer for asking for ID, he was obviously upset about the situation in general (his neighbor assuming a black man in predominantly white neighborhood is there to rob someone), but the situation that caused this incident wasn’t the officer’s fault (though some are saying that the officer acted inappropriately from the start- I don’t know. Let’s say for arguments sake that the officer is just an asshole to everyone), that’s true. What is the officer’s fault is that after Gates provided him with TWO forms of ID he didn’t simply apologize for the misunderstanding and leave. If it had been a white male the officer would have left/ignored any inflammatory remarks.
    ALSO, “It’s not disputed that he was disturbing the peace”. Actually, it is. The man had/has a recorded chest infection. As someone who has had bronchitis eight times, I seriously doubt Gates could raise his voice to the point of being an actual disturbance.
    It’s awesome that you’re so trusting of law enforcement and are taking the police report at face value. I admire that sort of optimism, but here in reality people do this thing called lying.

  94. ktrujillo wrote:

    I compared my experience of a cooperative citizen to one who clearly was not.

    *******

    Quoth John who doesn’t realize that citizenship is tiered and has presumably never, as a ‘citizen’, been asked for his green card at a job interview or been told to return to Mexico even though he was born and raised in Colorado.
    You sir are comparing your experience as a white citizen and if you don’t think that matters you are sadly mistaken.

  95. Jessica wrote:

    @ John Parker,

    Once again that is your perspective as a white male who was approached by white male officers. They were not intimitated by you and vice-versa.

    “The point I’m making is that he wasn’t asked for his ID because he’s black.”

    Hmm, did you miss the part where it said that there was a robbery and his white neighbor phoned the police because there was a black man (she does know Dr. Gates but didn’t recognize him. Interesting) entering a home. They obviously asked for a id simply because he was black. Period.

    In your situation you were asked for id because the alarm went off and couldn’t turn it off, not simply because you were a white man (I’m reversing it for so you could maybe have a bit of understanding of how it feels to be consistenly discrimated on) in an upper-class black neighborhood.

  96. Asianlawyer wrote:

    There is no evidence that the police report was fabricated. That hypothesis derives from your own prejudicial assumptions. However two facts in this case are undisputed:

    1) The police had PROBABLE CAUSE to investigate after receiving a facially accurate report from the neighbor.

    2) Prof. Gates was arrested outside his house after the officer decided to LEAVE when he was certain that Gates was who he said he was.

  97. Asianlawyer wrote:

    Oh and the reason Gates was not prosecuted was because this situation was an embarassment for all parties. No reason to extend it.

  98. merq wrote:

    @:
    Feminazi,
    atlasien
    ktrujillo
    Jessica

    Please stop. I honesty value your perseverance and appreciate your insistence on explaining the obvious to Terry & John Parker, but surely you know better.

    We see this type of behavior all the time. When a faced with an account of possible racist behavior, half of them groan about how dog tired they are of hearing about racism. (Gee, dickwad. I’m sorry my incarceration inconvenienced you.)

    The other half will ask for photo/videographic proof, a blood sample, three forms of ID, and your social security number before accepting the possibility that race was even a factor in the incident.

    I’m truly not sure which half I despise more.

    Don’t waste your breath.

  99. John Parker wrote:

    @Feminazi: I haven’t seen the police report, but according to news excerpts from the police report: “Gates refused to step outside to speak with the officer, the police report said, and when Crowley told Gates that he was investigating a possible break-in, Gates opened the front door and exclaimed, ‘Why, because I’m a black man in America?’ Gates followed the officer outside and continued to accuse him of racial bias, the report said. After Crowley warned the professor twice that he was becoming disorderly, the officer wrote he arrested Gates for ‘loud and tumultuous behavior in a public space.’ ” That’s what I meant by “not cooperative”. Dr. Gates eventually showed his ID after refusing to do so. I’m sorry, but I don’t believe that the police risked their livelihoods by falsifying a police report for the sole purpose of harassing a man just because he is black.

    @ktrujillo: Luckily my wife, who is puerto-rican, has yet to be affected by such racism here in America, but I’m fully aware that racial bias does still exist. I just don’t believe that this particular incident is an example of racial bias.

  100. PPR_Scribe wrote:

    Much is being made of the “disorderly conduct”/”disturbing the peace” aspects of this case to support the police actions. I am not a legal scholar, but my experience as a community resident living near two college campuses (one in the Boston area) means I have seen police respond to unruly scenes many times. As I understand it, they have leeway in deciding how to handle the situation. They can make arrests, yes. They also can choose to give verbal warnings, or citations, and just leave.

    If police officers can give just a verbal warning to an apartment full of partiers urinating on my lawn and throwing up in the stairwell and making out on my car, then surely they can choose to not cart a middle aged home owner away in handcuffs.

    The latter was a show of power, pure and simple.

  101. jen* wrote:

    I wasn’t going to say anything else about this, but then I came back and read more comments. My mind is reeling at this gem:

    Essentially when the officer left the house, implictly [sic] acknowledging that he made a mistake, Gates still would not let the issue go.

    Seriously, Asianlawyer? Barging into someone’s house in the middle of the day, while they try to prove they are who they say they are, basically harassing someone in their own home isn’t worthy of an actual verbal apology? “Implicit” acknowledgment should just suffice?

    Events such as this, and the ensuing responses, do not leave me with much hope. To many of us here, the issue is clear – that race was a factor in the arrest is easy to see. But those who are diametrically opposed are not swayed by further details of the story, personal anecdotes demonstrating similar behavior, statistics, or any other commentary. What is the answer when people refuse to listen?

    I don’t know. And I don’t know any other ways of putting this to get people to understand. If people are honest with themselves, they can perceive the truth. Otherwise, they will just continue to be champions for the “poor police officer, just trying to do his job”.

  102. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    ::::blows whistle:::::

    Again people. Learn to agree to disagree and move on.

    Asian Lawyer & John Parker –

    I understand where you two are coming from.

    Truly I do. But take a second to remember where you are. This is a POC dominated blog – we aren’t tripping. There are a lot of people trying to convey to you that overreacting or not, the policeman was in the wrong, and it is an indignity that would not have been suffered if Prof. Gates was white.

    Let me tell you a little story.

    I’m a black woman. I’ve never even been *close* to being in trouble with the law. It just doesn’t happen for me. Plus I grew up in MoCo, I have a great “white” voice and learned to mimic the type of assumptions and entitlement that my white peers (and a few upper class blacks) just knew.

    However.

    Every last one of my black and latino male friends has been arrested. They may not have been incarcerated. But they have all been arrested. I’ve seen maybe seven or so of these altercations begin. And in each occasion, the tone of the interaction is set by the officer. It’s normally the officer that initiates contact.

    And for the life of me, I can’t reconcile these experiences.

    I don’t understand why I’m at an out of control party with my white friends, who had a pile of cocaine in the bathroom, and the police come and barely look around, but when I’m sitting on a park bench with my black friend, the *park* police want to come by and harass him for littering since they spotted a cup underneath the bench. (One that was there before we arrived.)

    I don’t understand why if the Salvadorean children I baby sat for were threatened with a knife by a white boy in the neighborhood, that the Officer who arrived berates us and their mother, then takes his hat off respectfully when approaching the grandparents of the white boy with the knife.

    I don’t understand why I can watch the police get called to my building and watch the man making a ruckus get immediately escorted out, but when I call the police because there are two white guys down the hall screaming curses at a woman who isn’t answering the door, the police want to have a conversation and help solve his problem.

    I say this as a person who was mentored by a Montgomery County Police Lieutenant.

    I don’t know what happens when people cross the blue line, but it seems to me they suddenly have a lot more power to act on existing prejudices and a lot less fear of retribution.

  103. Asianlawyer wrote:

    Look I know this is a POC blog. I happen to be a POC. And I am not unaware of the racial disparities in our criminal justice system that negatively affect black folks every day, including the racial profiling that sometimes has fatal effects. Or the white privilege that results in POC being treated different from white folks in all sorts of scenarios. However, let me reiterate that this situation is NOT one of them. At worst this was a midunderstanding that was made worse by the stubborness, pride, and pig-headedness (no pun intended) on both sides. I’ve read POVs from both of the cop and Prof. Gates. And here is what cannot be disputed:

    1) The cops had probable cause to investigate.

    2) Prof. Gates presented ID.

    3) The officer asked if anyone else was in the house (when investigating a suspected break in this is a legitimate question)

    4) Prof. Gates was uncooperative in answering the cop’s questions and made accusations of racism.

    5) The officer left the house, Mr. Gates continued to follow the officer and berate him. Resulting in an arrest for disorderly conduct.

    None of this is racist, although I do think that the arrest was unnecessary and showed poor judgment on the part of the officer. Everything else is exactly how I hope a cop would act when investigating a suspected break in.

  104. c.n. edaw wrote:

    Excellent reply LaToya! My experiences as a black woman who grew up in the suburbs mimic yours in that post in so many ways!

  105. Catherine wrote:

    Outrageous! Identification was more than enough. How many of us have come across police officers like this? I have been intimidated in my own home when the cops made a mix up when arriving at my door asking for a person with my first name but not mentioning a last name. Had my sleepy son not walked out of his room and said, happily, ” a police officer!” so excited to meet a hero previously in his eyes. Luckily, he did not have to hear one of them make a comment about my friend cooking in the kitchen, younger than me, and African – is he your son too? Or being out on the streets as a journalist covering a protest for a public television project, and being threatened by the police in my own city. Frankly, these officers should be fired and the Boston Police department counseled on what constitutes appropriate identification. There is NO excuse and if Boston police doesn’t want its image tarnished as a racist department, take immediate disciplinary action. Otherwise, how are your officers going to learn they are not Gods, they are hired and paid for by the public. You don’t get paid to unfairly harass citizens. Shameful.

  106. Lxy wrote:

    Here is an analysis of the incident drawing upon Crowley’s own report.

    The sequence of events, Crowley’s actions, and the “disorderly conduct” arrest are analyzed in detail:

    By telling Gates to come outside, Crowley establishes that he has lost all semblance of professionalism. It has now become personal and he wants to create a violation of 272/53. He gets Gates out onto the porch because a crowd has gathered providing onlookers who could experience alarm. Note his careful recitation (tumultuous behavior outside the residence in view of the public). And please do not overlook Crowley’s final act of provocation. He tells an angry citizen to calm down while producing handcuffs. The only plausible question for the chief to ask about that little detail is: “Are you stupid, or do you think I’m stupid?” Crowley produced those handcuffs to provoke Gates and then arrested him. The decision to arrest is telling. If Crowley believed the charge was valid, he could have issued a summons. An arrest under these circumstances shows his true intent: to humiliate Gates.

    No one who is familiar with law enforcement can miss the significance of Crowley’s report. As so often happens with documentary evidence, a person seeking to create a false impression spends lots of time nailing down the elements he thinks will establish his goal, but forgets about the larger picture. Under color of law, Crowley entered a residence to investigate a possible break-in, and after his probable cause had evaporated, he continued to act under color of law, but without any justifiable purpose. And he covered it up with false charges. Figuring that his best defense was a criminal charge, Crowley did what bad cops do. He decided he would look better if Gates looked worse. Perhaps one day cops will figure out that trumped-up charges worsen a case of investigating something that turns out not to have been a crime. It is horribly wrong when police officers falsely accuse an injured arrestee of A&B PO (”assault and battery on a police officer,” a felony) but at least there is some logic to the lie. If a disorderly conduct charge follows an investigation of a non-crime, chances are pretty good that the cop handled himself badly. Pursuit of charges should be strongly disfavored.

    http://www.samefacts.com/archives/crime_control_/2009/07/nightmare_on_ware_street.php

  107. John Parker wrote:

    When I first read the headline of this story, was first reaction was one of outrage that this man fell victim of racial profiling. After reviewing the evidence as reported by the media, however, I came to the conclusion that Dr. Gates was in the wrong.

    It seems that everyone here is being influenced by their own experience with police, regardless of what the evidence suggests. Those of you who have been victims of racial bias in the past seem to be wholly convinced that this incident was racism on behalf of the police. Those of us who have not been subject to racism review the exact same facts and come to the conclusion that Dr. Gates’ behavior was unacceptable, and that the arrest was warranted.

  108. PatrickInBeijing wrote:

    The obvious. Dr. Gates was arrested on the most ridiculous of charges. This kind of arrest is never intended to stop a crime, but to control behavior that the police don’t like. “Disturbing the Peace” is prosecuted, like, how often? It is an imaginary crime invented to allow the police to exercise social control. It is almost always dropped, or pleaded to a simple fine.

    IT IS NOT A REAL CRIME. It is the police equivalent of “I can arrest you any time I feel like not matter what is going on, so I have the power and don’t you forget it”.

    Anyone who is arguing that Dr. Gates did something wrong, should quantify exactly what “real” crime he supposedly committed. Had a loud voice? Oh, wait, asked for an officers name and badge number? (There could be a whole series on why police hate to give out this information, even when they are required by law to do so (hey, does that mean they are criminals, too??)

    Oh, WAIT, I forgot. He suggested that racism was playing a part in what was happening to him.

    Think for a minute.

    He was arrested for suggesting that there was racism involved in something and he objected to it.

    That is pretty damn scary. Think about it. Really.

  109. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @John Parker –

    Those of you who have been victims of racial bias in the past seem to be wholly convinced that this incident was racism on behalf of the police. Those of us who have not been subject to racism review the exact same facts and come to the conclusion that Dr. Gates’ behavior was unacceptable, and that the arrest was warranted.

    Exactly. Most of us know the “proper” reaction when engaged with the police. No sudden moves, false starts, reaching for your wallet, raising your voice, etc. And the police know the correct way to engage with a citizen without the immediate threat of danger. However, how you see the situation looks a lot different depending on what side of the law enforcement situation you’ve been on. “I began questioning the subject” means anything from “Can you please produce ID” to “Uh huh. So you live here? Riiiight….If you live here, where’s your ID?”

    Cops never put *their* aggression in the report. How would that look? So it’s quietly included as a note. “I approached the suspect” not “I made a sarcastic comment and the subject didn’t take it well, and that escalated the situation.”

    But again, if you haven’t been through it, it is a difficult thing to fathom. I used to think the same thing – “why didn’t you just calm down? If you speak to the officer reasonably, and do what they ask, things will be fine.”

    Then I watched people being provoked.

    People that I knew were generally unflappable, calm, reasonable people.

    And like I said, my black and latino friends started to getting arrested. Normally it doesn’t go beyond an arrest. But they get arrested, booked, and then released. Just because.

    So, some of us will not trust this situation.

    It feels too familiar.

  110. PatrickInBeijing wrote:

    And duhh, the dumb obvious (hitting the enter button too quick).

    Dr. Gates was arrested because he was a Black man who was experiencing what he perceived to be racism (I perceive it too, and I’m white, but I would not have been arrested) and complained about it.

    He was a Black man who objected to racist treatment, so he was arrested.

    Why don’t people get this? Heads out of the sand, folks.

    This kind of thing happens how often? No statistics kept by the state.

    Scary, scary, scary. If they do this to the middle class POC, what do you think they do to the working class POC?

  111. Medusa wrote:

    @ John Parker- interesting how that works, isn’t it? People who don’t experience racism don’t fucking recognize and come up with “it’s not that he’s racist, it’s just that [fill in the blank with some asinine shit]“. People that experience racism KNOW WHAT RACISM IS BECAUSE WE HAVE EXPERIENCED IT.

    I can’t take the apologism both on this post (the comments) and other anti-racist blogs. I don’t think I can even stomach looking at any other threads on this.

  112. Joyce wrote:

    @DCBred

    What’s that old sign say?
    N-word, if you can read this, run.
    If you can’t read, run anyway.

  113. gatamala wrote:

    UMMM RE: Gates “tumult”. Police reports are 0ne-sided docs. They are not objective.

    & yes belligerence is black

    if Gates were white it would be called umbrage

  114. gatamala wrote:

    lxy thank you for that link. John Parker should read it.

  115. Phil Deeze wrote:

    Latoya,
    I don’t know what’s sadder: the fact that Dr. Gates was assaulted in his own home by an officer of the law or the sick sentiments posed by some of the folks posting here apologizing for the police’s behavior and/or the comments from people in the Boston newspaper article on Gates’ arrest.
    Why didn’t the cops, realizing that THEY had screwed up, acknowledge the error and walk away? They didn’t try to avoid conflict, but why should they? #1: They have the color of law, #2: They had guns and Dr. Gates didn’t, and #3: There are people out there like asianlawyer, John Parker, etc. who will always give the cops more than the benefit of the doubt.
    The reason the police didn’t walk away was ego, plain and simple. Disorderly conduct? Puh-lease. They had to make some kind of arrest or let the entire neighborhood know that they had no probable cause to make an arrest. Should they have swung by and checked out the call about a robbery in progress? Certainly. But the second the police got ID from Dr. Gates the only thing they should say is “Sorry for the inconvenience, Dr. Gates. Have a nice day.” It’s obvious they wanted to embarrass and defame Dr. Gates in the way only a jealous racist cop can: goad you into making a false move so he can pull a gun or handcuffs. Or, put you in handcuffs and then shoot you as Oscar Grant learned and paid with his life.
    This was a crap arrest. That police office should lose his job. He doesn’t have the requisite intelligent or temperament to be allowed to wear a badge and carry a gun.

  116. ktrujillo wrote:

    Those of you who have been victims of racial bias in the past seem to be wholly convinced that this incident was racism on behalf of the police. Those of us who have not been subject to racism review the exact same facts and come to the conclusion that Dr. Gates’ behavior was unacceptable, and that the arrest was warranted.

    *****

    “Unacceptable”? By your standards not mine. Your standards, of course, are normative and mine a departure from the norm . If anyone dares disagree with how the dominate paradigm views a situation or reacts in a way that has not been sanctioned…there’s a jail cell waiting. You call that justice.

  117. Jay wrote:

    You know what?

    This reminds me of that scene in Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle where they’re in the jail, and the black pacifist is “resisting arrest” when he just stands there and gets beaten up while the jail door is open.

    Except that this is real.

  118. Black Ivy wrote:

    ktrujillo and Latoya, great job. there is no hope with some people but it is so validating to hear so many responsible voices here. I especially am validated by all the white posters who get it. It makes me think that there is hope. Thank you for taking the time to understand something that doesn’t immediately affect you. We are all in this together.

  119. Montclair Mommy wrote:

    @ John Parker:

    “Those of you who have been victims of racial bias in the past seem to be wholly convinced that this incident was racism on behalf of the police. Those of us who have not been subject to racism review the exact same facts and come to the conclusion that Dr. Gates’ behavior was unacceptable, and that the arrest was warranted.”

    Wrong. I am a white woman. I was was raised to believe the police were my protectors. And I look at this situation and ALL I can think of is how this would NEVER have happened to a white person. It is racism, pure and simple.

    I have NEVER been the subject of police maltreatment, even when it was warranted. When I was under-aged and drinking at a party they STILL called me ma’am…and you better believe me and all of my (white) friends were being sassy. No arrest there.

    When I look at this situation I see nothing but racism that caused it and nothing but racism that brought it to the point of arrest…and I see racism NOT because I’ve experienced it (as a white person, I haven’t), but because my eyes are (now) wide open. But, I have been like you, trying to read a situation with a racial lens. Trying to explain away all of the obvious racism going on around me. I have been that white woman saying to myself, “Oh that’s not racism. That person should have just [insert ridiculous behavior that a white person would not be expected to do here]” I can look back and remember feeling so indignant that I should have to hear about this “racism” all the time. But, you know what? I was wrong. I was living in a little bubble and the amount of ignorance and naivete I had to exhibit to not see the racism all around me astounds me now. I know the (probably subconscious) mental loops you have to do when you read these types of articles to convince yourself its not racism. Its hard to admit that you are where you are in life partly due to your skin color. Its hard to admit that it wasn’t all merit. Its hard to admit that you probably are a part of what brings others down. I know it is. But that doesn’t make you right. I hope someday you are able to wake up and see the world as it is instead of how you want it to be, but I know that’s a big step. It took a LONG time for me to get there and I still struggle with my own internal racism every day. I hope someday you have an experience that opens your eyes. Until then, there isn’t much anyone can say that will get through your denial.

    @asianlawyer, did your law school offer a seminar on police and the interpretation of law? When I went to law school I took that class and, although at the time I was less open to it, it really did inform me about all of the different approaches the police take towards people. This could have gone in a COMPLETELY different way. Its not beyond the pale to have expected the police to be apologetic when asking for ID. I think if the police had been respectful and polite that would have gone a long way toward calming this man down. They ARE taught community relations skills in most precincts. I’m wondering why they didn’t bother using them here? Is it because they didn’t like getting talked to like that by a Black man? I think if we’re being real with ourselves here we’d realize that this would not have happened to any of the white professors at Harvard.

  120. RCHOUDH wrote:

    Ok on CNN just now I’m seeing more information about this situation. It’s now being claimed that Officer Crowley is an expert on racial profiling and conducts classes teaching other officers how not to engage in racial profiling…interesting. Also President Obama’s weighing in on the situation (by calling the cops’ actions stupid) is causing outrage (with people thinking Obama went too far calling the cops stupid…which he didn’t he just said their actions in this situation was stupid). This has caused Crowley to be “disappointed” in Obama and to dig in his heels and refuse to apologize for the incident. Just thought I’d update you guys on the latest.

  121. Cass wrote:

    NPR has news on the police officer and his diversity class: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106936583

  122. Xavienne wrote:

    They seem to be making a big deal of dropping the charges when what they should be doing is issuing a formal apology to this gentleman for arresting him for being in his own home! The audacity of that cop to be so concerned about covering his own ass that he wouldn’t give his name and badge number (which at least as far as Canada’s police go, they are required to do if asked) that he’d cause the arrest of a person he knew at that point to be the legal tenant? It makes me furious to think that that particular officer is still employed!

  123. Squidfly wrote:

    I realize trying to explain profiling to certain white folks, i.e. John Parker, Terry, or P.O.C like Asian Lawyer, is like trying to debunk the Obama Birthers.

  124. Squidfly wrote:

    I mean how can you explain a fact of life. Profiling no matter who you are Ph’d, undercover cop, you’re always under surveillance. Also for the profiling doubters such as John Parker and Terry. Read up on the Black Codes.

    Belligerence and angry= Uppity.

    I’m always assumed to be belligerent, so when I go to Starbucks, I order with a big grin

  125. Evan wrote:

    I am on the fence with this one. I think Gates pulled the “Do you know who I am?” line on the cop. Crowley wasn’t amused. I bet the officer has heard this line from other big-shot Harvard faculty and administrators before. Working class Cambridge cops are not fond of the Harvard brahmins (regardless of their skin color).

    Gates claimed that he eventually gave the officer his driver license for proof of ID. Officer Crowley said that this didn’t happen and Gates continued to be hostile during the situation. Somebody is lying through his teeth here. Where are the witnesses that can verify the actual events?

    Charging someone-and by extension–the entire police department of racism is serious business. This is probably why the Cambridge police dropped the charges against Dr. Gates. This would be a real PR nightmare for the department and the county prosecutor’s office. Dropping the charges does NOT imply a mea culpa of racial bias though.

    I think in the end…this was an embarrassing situation for everyone. Officer Crowley should have allowed Gates to vent his frustration and once there was ID verification…it’s have a nice day and sorry for the trouble.

    On the other side, the old professor should have kept his cool and understand that the cops are just trying to do their jobs–even if they come off as aggressive.

    Black activists and white conservatives are going to have a field day with one. Let them scream at each other in the media…I am tuning them all out.

  126. gakid wrote:

    This cop calls himself an expert on racial profiling, huh. Yeah, right. Try telling that to Henry Louis Gates and his supporters.

  127. Squidfly wrote:

    This reminds of the scene in 48 hours, when Murphy walks into the Redneck bar and shouts “This is your worst fucking nightmare, a N—-, with a badge”.

    Maybe Gates said to Crowley, “This is your worst fucking Nightmare, N—-with a Ph’d”.

    This is about class and race, as seen by the vitriol from so many…

  128. Phil Deeze wrote:

    @Evan,
    The reason that Cambridge PD is taking it in the tailpipe on this is the behavior of other Massachusetts police forces in how they handled the Dee Brown and Charles Stuart cases. Those two situations galvanized a LOT of black folks against all men and women in law enforcement. And these cases were egregious cases of racial profiling.
    This officer, I hear, is supposed to be a VERY nice person. He volunteers and helps black kids by coaching youth sports. He even tried to perform CPR on Reggie Lewis when he collapsed of a massive heart attack; however, when he discovered that the person he was investigating was an esteemed member of the community, he should’ve handed the guy’s ID back and said, “Come on, guys, let’s get off of Dr. Gates’ lawn and let him get some shut-eye. Sorry for the inconvenience, Dr. Gates. If you want to file a complaint, here’s my business card and the form you need to submit.”
    Once this “officer” went for the “disorderly conduct” and put the cuffs, all the good work in the community with black kids he’s done went right out the window. It was a punk move by someone that had a bad day and wanted to arrest someone. I have little pity for the guy. When he’s got handcuffs, a PR 24, chemical mace, a gun and the authority to use it? He can’t have a bad day. He draws that gun and shoots someone because he wants them to respect him? And you can’t take that back or press a do-over button.

  129. Joy wrote:

    @Asianlawyer
    I’m assuming from your screen name that you’re a lawyer . . . if I’m correct, then SHAME on you. You KNOW better. (Your comment at #103 is why on exams students are encouraged to “argue in the alternative” because this answeralone would almost certainly earn you a D at most.)

    @RCHOUDH
    He’s a racial profiling expert? Hilarious or profoundly disturbing?

    @ all those who say “he should have just kept calm.”
    Apparently you didn’t read the numerous posts saying police officers do not go around arresting people who become aggravated/agitated/angry when they are wrongly accused/arrested. Forget that – they don’t even arrest people who are snarky/demand badge numbers/get angry after receiving a speeding ticket!! These attempts to justify the situation are really disappointing. If it had been your family member arrested in a similar situation while doing nothing more than Mr. Gates would you be so condescending?

  130. Montclair Mommy wrote:

    @ Evan, I think you’re wrong here on the ID issue. In all of the articles I read it said that Prof Gates INITIALLY didn’t want to show his ID, but he eventually did. Its not disputed that he eventually showed his ID, ex: “The police said Professor Gates initially refused to show identification and repeatedly shouted at officers.” http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/24/us/24blacks.html. The police never said he refused to show his ID at all. Lord knows what have happened had he refused completely. They didn’t believe he lived there WITH the id. Without it they probably would have arrested the poor guy for breaking and entering. Maybe you got confused: Officer Crowley did refuse to give his Badge number (pretty sure that’s not allowed), perhaps that was the ID you were thinking of?

    You think that departments drop charges due to the fact that they might be PR nightmares? Ever live in LA?

  131. merq wrote:

    Evan,

    I don’t care to wade into these waters any further. My masochistic days are behind me.

    But I will point out something to you and all the others upthread who said things like:

    Charging someone-and by extension–the entire police department of racism is serious business. This is probably why the Cambridge police dropped the charges against Dr. Gates.

    or that the cop would never have arrested Gates without ample cause because he knew he would be strung up for racial profiling either way.

    I call bullshit. This has happened for eons now. Cops are videotaped being barbaric in their brutality to POC and the issue of racism is raised, but the entire system shrugs it off and everybody moves on. From Diallo to Louima to Bell (and the dozens of unlucky POC in between), there’s been a consistent pattern of clearly racially-motivated (and often lethal) abuse of force that doesn’t even get a slap on the wrist.

    So, my friends, I must point out the obvious to you. These charges weren’t dropped because they were afraid of being seen as racist. They were dropped because they realized they rousted a POC with considerable influence, as they would an unknown darkie.

    It saddens me that I have to explain this to people.

    @ Latoya
    Thanks so much for posting your experiences. I’ve been arrested for some complete idiocy too, and as a racially aware black man in America, who happens to be 6′6″, I knew to be extremely cautious in the way I interacted with those fuckwads. Still, a few of their comments made it clear they were relishing this moment in which they could put this black man who earned twice their salary, at half their age, in his place. I haven’t trusted the police in over a decade, but that still definitely hurt me deeply.

    What hurt even more was an encounter with the DC Metro Police two years ago.

    :::: Listen up, all apologists and deniers (not that I expect it to make a difference):

    I was leaving a party with my cousin and a few friends one night in April/May ‘07. Because most of the people who attended knew each other through the vast network of Nigerians that inhabit the DC/MD area, there was a lot of chatting and exchanging of contact info going on in front of the lounge as it closed.

    Now, I’ve seen some rowdy-ass parties in MD, but this scene was nowhere near rowdy — there was a general feel-good vibe going as we talked about plans for the rest of the weekend, and what diner to grab a bite at before dispersing for the night.

    Out of nowhere, a tear-gas canister flies into the crowd, and through the gas (and our half-shut eyes), I see a DC cop car speed off. Now, I’m from New York, so maybe drive-by gassings are a DC thing, but I was confused as all hell. Then as everyone comes to their senses and some wonder who the fuck gassed us for no reason, I notice my cousin in the fetal position on the sidewalk.

    First, a bit of info on my cousin. She’s tiny. I mean “120lbs soaking wet tiny”. I mean “lying to people that you’re 5′4″ when you’re really 5′3″ tiny. Oh, and did I forget to mention, a lifelong asthma patient?

    So, as it turns out the canister landed right in front of her, so she got most of the impact of its first blast. Couple proximity with her respiratory problems, and you’ve got a near-incapacitated woman on your hands.

    Naturally, a bunch of us were frantic at this point. She didn’t have an inhaler on her, and we couldn’t find anyone that did. We see another squad car passing by as we’re dialing 911 and we flag him down.

    We explain how it had apparently triggered a violent asthma attack and we ask for his help in getting her some emergency care (be it a siren-assisted ride to the ER or whatever came to mind). He was cooperative and sympathetic until the exact moment he asked:

    “but who threw the tear gas?”
    - “another cop did.”

    Suddenly, the blue wall came up. And just like Latoya and so many other POC in this country have experienced, he turned from concerned and sympathetic to defensive and inflammatory. Suddenly, one friend was told to “go sit over there, skinny man” and a few other barbs were thrown out, apparently in the hope that someone would do something to essentially put us (and not his department) in the “wrong,” come police-report time.

    As he went back and forth with “little/skinny man,” I damn-near crying with frustration, yelled out “Can you leave this guy alone and look at my cousin ON THE FLOOR?? She needs help!”

    At this point, he turned to me, and he looked so orgasmic in his discovery of the perfect big-black-man target that I really should’ve known better than to respond to whatever he said to provoke me immediately after. All I remember is being dragged away by two friends immediately I reacted.

    At this point, it became clear the cops weren’t going to help us, so an acquaintance (I think only one of us knew the guy) suggested we drive to his place on our way to the ER and grab his inhaler. A few of us left to do that.

    Meanwhile, the situation having calmed down back outside the lounge, my “skinny” friend wanted to get the cop’s badge number to file a report. His girlfriend volunteered to go instead, to avoid a repeat altercation.

    I wasn’t there, so I don’t know the specifics, but all I know is:
    1. Cop refused to provide his badge number.
    2. Cop apparently started on my friend (skinny guy’s girlfriend)
    3. Skinny guy got out of the car and approached officer to get the badge number himself.
    4. Skinny guy gets arrested for (you guessed it) Disorderly Conduct.

    People don’t understand what these encounters do to the psyches of the people involved. All you want to see is angry, belligerent black people shouting racism whenever things don’t go their way. You don’t see people who have to deal with the lasting pain that comes with the realization that being black in the wrong place, at the wrong time around the wrong people.

    That’s all I’ve got. I’m going to work.

  132. Fiqah wrote:

    @The Editrix, merq: Well-said. And I know without a doubt that so many of us, commenting and merely lurking, FEEL you.

    @John Parker, Asianlawyer, and (to a lesser degree) Evan: Your lack of/misplaced empathy is appalling. Rationalizing this all away as the collective delusion of a few hypersensitive nutjobs – in light of the fact that CITIZENS are often KILLED by cops who are “just doing their jobs” – is flat-out unacceptable. Shame on you.

  133. Black Ivy wrote:

    cosign Montclair Mommy and great post merq. I dont think I can take anymore of this today :(

  134. Sean wrote:

    @ Merq, sadly to some of us, that’s just another day in the U.S of A. I hope your friend is ok.

    Some people will never know the feeling of “Will I be the next Amadou Diallo?” when dealing with law enforcement.

    I honest to God, hope they never do.

  135. Jennifer P wrote:

    @Evan
    “I am on the fence with this one. I think Gates pulled the “Do you know who I am?” line on the cop. Crowley wasn’t amused. I bet the officer has heard this line from other big-shot Harvard faculty and administrators before. Working class Cambridge cops are not fond of the Harvard brahmins (regardless of their skin color). ”

    I agree that town/gown and class issues were probably as much if not more a part of Crowley’s motivation as race–i.e. white working class cop just doing his job by responding to a call gets irked when snooty Harvard prof, instead of being polite and deferential, exercises his legal rights to question the officer’s identity and reason for being there (and “Sgt. Crowley from the Cambridge police” does NOT count as proper identification), to refuse to leave his home or invite the cop into his home (although acc. to Gates and undisputed by the police report, Crowley entered without permission when Gates turned to go get his ID–which frankly would scare the crap out of me!), and to refuse to answer additional questions without a warrant.

    That Gates also raised the issue of racism was undoubtedly particularly offensive to a white cop who apparently prides himself on his racial sensitivity. (Although I must say that if I read one more article hyping his extreme generosity in performing CPR on one black basketball player, as an EMT and police officer on scene, over a decade ago as evidence of his obvious racial tolerance, I’m going to throw up.)

    But the fact is that if he were a white Harvard prof, Crowley would almost certainly have apologized for bothering him, politely asked if he needed any assistance in securing his home, and left, since yelling at the cops and questioning their motivations is not even remotely illegal. He might have gone back to the station house and bitched to his friends about snooty Harvard types who don’t appreciate the CPD, but the chances he would have interpreted the prof’s vocal expressions of anger as “disorderly conduct” and slapped cuffs on him are probably nil.

    I think this is actually less an example of racial profiling per se than of racially discriminatory police response. As others have noted above: angry affluent white man = offended citizen to be placated, angry black man = disorderly, tumultuous, belligerent threat to be arrested. But it is an outrageous abuse of police power that very likely would not have happened to a white person. And I’d echo the other folks here who have been in the company of plenty of white people behaving badly toward and in front of the cops who has never, ever seen one get arrested for disorderly conduct or disturbing the peace.

    Sure, if Gates had behaved politely and deferentially, he probably wouldn’t have pissed off Crowley. But pissing off the cops is not illegal, and it’s not Gates’ job to soothe the feelings of police officers. It IS Crowley’s job to maintain the peace, which means treating citizens with respect and justice even when they piss him off, not goading them into stepping outside their homes so he’ll have an excuse to arrest them on some trumped up charge.

  136. Asianlawyer wrote:

    Joy FYI, I did not argue both sides because this is not a law school exam and I did not agree with Gates’ supporters. I do not deny that racial disparities in our legal system negatively affect POC. However going through my three years of school I learned to put my own prejudicies aside when analyzing a set of facts and look at it as objectively as possible. Based on both Gates’ account and the police report (both of which I read) it is clear to me that Gates was in the wrong on this. The decision to arrest him was stupid, however it was not racially motivated. The information released concerning Crowley only furthers my belief that my feeling on this case is the correct one, untouched by my own biases (which as contrary to the assumption of most board posters, is generally not with the authorities in situations like this). Oh and Obama’s comments are inappropriate (and not because he disagrees with my POV) since this case is a local police matter outside federal jurisdiction. The proper response would have been “no comment.”

  137. John Parker wrote:

    There is apparently no amount of reason that will allow you to be objective regarding this incident.

    I chose to post on this blog to avoid the rampart bias and racist remarks common to every blog I saw before I found this one (kudo’s to the mods, btw).

    What I had hoped to achieve was to convince even one person to be open-minded and consider both sides of the story, and to come to an objective conclusion based not on history, but based on the events that actually unfolded. I will never know if that goal was achieved, because I am done here.

  138. Asianlawyer wrote:

    Oh and I resent the implication that because Evan, John, and I disagree with the prevailing (and often times accurate) narrative of racial profiling and disparate treatment, that means we are unempathetic, ignorant, sociopathic, and racially insensitive individuals. Can we disagree on our views on this board without being disagreeable? Racial profiling in law enforcement is a fact and I doubt any of us on this board disagree. I also doubt that their is plenty of power tripping and bullying in many police departments. However, the facts in this situation lead me to believe that race was not the issue in this situation and that were Prof. Gates a white man, the exact same thing would have happened and Sgt. Crowley would have acted the same way. This investigation was not done on the whim of the officer, he had probable cause to ask for ID and ask whether anyone else was in the house.

  139. Asianlawyer wrote:

    “I also doubt that their is plenty of power tripping and bullying in many police departments.”

    I meant I also DO NOT DOUBT….

    I feel like I need to post this clarification of my typo since I don’t want my last post to be misconstrued.

  140. Phil Deeze wrote:

    Asianlawyer and John Parker,
    These incidents are not isolated and do not occur in a vacuum. You know when, as a black man, I get scared? When a police officer is hurt or killed in the line of duty. This swings the pendulum in a direction that, as a black guy, you do NOT want it to go: the police force shifts paradigms from protect and serve to seeking retribution and the revisit that on some innocent folks in the mode of brutality and poor policing i.e. blame the victims for their circumstances rather than, you know, policing.
    Again, Dee Brown, Charles Stuart, Ryan Moats, Robbie Toland, Oscar Grant, Susan Smith, etc. The myth of the young urban supercriminal is being revisited on some decent folks. Dee Brown had guns pulled on him for buying a house. Ryan Moats almost got himself shot by a cop who was looking to make his night difficult (cop’s words.) Toland? He’s got a bullet in him that won’t ever come out of his body and for what? Some idiot cop (yeah, it was a STUPID mistake) got the idea that a car was stolen and read the information wrong, followed the car anyway, rousted the wrong man, and shot him when he protested because he perceived a threat. Grant? He’s not saying anything. He was shot dead in front of hundreds of people. Face down. In handcuffs.
    Enough is enough. I recognize how hard it is to police a community. But really? Asianlawyer, you’re supposed to have passed the bar? Come on, now. This isn’t a high-crime area, is it? “Securing the scene” as a ploy for the cop to stick around? It doesn’t take THAT long to check for “others” in the house. And that cop’s an ignorant ass–he knew damn well there wasn’t anyone else in that house that could harm anyone. Otherwise, he would’ve removed Gates from the house first (for HIS safety) checked the house and then allowed the citizen to return to his home.
    The fact that he likes black people or voted for Obama or performed CPR on an NBA star means nothing now. Gates wasn’t a threat. If I were arguing this case in court, I’d have medical records showing an almost 60 year-old man with a replaced hip that has to ride a THREE-WHEEL bicycle and walks with a pronounced limp. This wasn’t O-Dog from “Menace II Society.” Officer Crowley, I’m sure, is a nice guy, but he screwed up here. He’ll be able to keep his job because there’s enough folks who think that black folks get off easy in this country wholesale that will keep him on the force.
    I don’t feel sorry for maniac cops (black or white,) but folks that feel the need to react when they feel “shown up” by a suspect, citizen, etc., that’s NOt a person that person does not need to have a gun or the authority to use one under color of law.

  141. Asianlawyer wrote:

    Phil, thank you for your response which was very informative and did not rely on personal attacks or accusations of bigotry. That being said, I hope I do not sound too defensive when I state that I know this situation cannot be read out of the context of the African American male experience with law enforcement. I understand why black folks would get scared around the police and that they have reason to. Therefore I can understand why Gates could be a bit hyped up in this situation and Crowley should have afforded him some leeway. However, I don’t think Crowley’s actions were motivated by race at all. Crowley had probable cause to investigate and his conduct was appropriate until he arrested the professor. As for the arrest, I thought that was foolish but I do not think it was motivated by race either or all that unusual for that matter. Maybe I’ve been reading too many cases but there are plenty of situations when 60 year olds who act disorderly may be arrested or restrained by the police officers. This was an embarassing incident for all parties, that is all it is.

    Oh and don’t be so sure that Cambridge is a low crime area.

  142. Evan wrote:

    Just a brief defense of my earlier post. I wasn’t inside Dr. Gates’ house when the confrontation happened. Neither was everyone else in the Racialicious forum. Just because Dr. Gates yells “this is racism” doesn’t mean that we all take his word for it.

    Look, what if Officer Crowley is just a plain dick? An ass hole who cannot handle anyone giving him attitude–not just from a black man who happens to be a distinguished academician from Harvard. A guy who gets off on abusing power because he has a badge and a firearm. Cops across every race and gender have this gross sense of entitlement. This is not a distinctive white cop problem. Do we know if there are public complaints on file against Crowley? If so, what is the racial breakdown?

    What if another white cop came onto the scene and handled the situation far differently? Not every white cop in the Cambridge police department is like Officer Crowley. Some are smarter and more sensitive to people. Others are undeniable racists. Can we call Crowley a racist? Would Gates himself yell “RACISM” if a Latino or Asian-American slapped the cuffs on him?

    I have too many questions and I cannot make a final judgment on Crowley or Gates. In the end, I think Crowley owes Gates an apology for being overly-aggressive in a situation that should have been resolved peacefully. However, almost everyone in this forum passed final judgment when the news of Dr. Gates’ arrest hit the news: Crowley is guilty as charged. On the other side, you have white conservatives already passing judgment on Gates and President Obama. Somewhere, cooler heads have to prevail here.

  143. Nina wrote:

    I am disheartened to read on the NYT website that Obama regrets his words about the arresting officer. If you recall he said that Crowley “acted stupidly”. In a statement today Obama said:

    “I continue to believe, based on what I have heard, that there was an overreaction in pulling Professor Gates out of his home to the station. I also continue to believe, based on what I heard, Professor Gates probably overreacted as well.”

    Sigh. Obama, I hoped for once, we would have a President who really brought to light the racial issues transpiring in this country. I understand it is about the polls and the health care bill is coming up for a vote etc. But really, Obama just threw Gates under the bus with that comment.

  144. Lxy wrote:

    Essentially, the arguments for the police boil down to a time-honored tactic: blame the victim.

    Gates was being “tumultous” … because he was upset for being accused of breaking into his own home.

    Gates was “uncooperative” … because, according to the police report, he did not immediately present his ID–even though he did present his ID shortly after.

    Gates was “belligerent” … because he mentioned the issue of racism, and (I like this part the best) supposedly dropped a “your momma” on Officer Crowley.

    But through it all, the larger point is studiously avoided: as soon as Crowley determined Gates’s ID and his right to be in the house, he should have just left.

    The disorderly conduct charge, arrest, and 4-hour jail time for Gates were wrong.

    As that analysis from the SameFacts website I quoted above puts it, “If a disorderly conduct charge follows an investigation of a non-crime, chances are pretty good that the cop handled himself badly.”

  145. PureGracefulTree wrote:

    @ Nina 143: I’m actually pretty pleased with what Obama did. Describing someone’s actions as “stupid” is not constructive, even when it’s true. The president did not ever condone the arrest, and while we might object to his characterization of Gates’ behavior as an “overreaction”, I think most of the commenters have acknowledged similar sentiments that he was probably testy after the long flight and irritated at being challenged in his own home. I don’t see Obama as having “thrown Gates under the bus”.

    What impresses me most, though, was that Obama called Crowley himself to clear the air and communicate directly. This is the kind of bridge-building we need; when people have misunderstandings, we talk about them and share our perspectives. I’m all for having a place like Racialicious where we can come to vent and feel supported (I was getting SO frustrated reading comments on conventional news sites)—AND, I am also all for conversations where people, strong in the knowledge that they have allies, engage in the difficult work of trying to heal.

  146. Phil Deeze wrote:

    Asianlawyer,
    Why don’t we cut the crap, OK? My father was a police officer in DC’s “4D” (4th District = precinct in other locales) so I know just as much about policing as you do. My father worked his way up from corporal up to captain (detective squad,) and I know that, in the police lockerroom, if you roust a 60 year-old man who needs a cane and is under 5′8″ tall, you’re going to be asked if you need back-up next time and treated like a wuss. Sorry. Gates didn’t have a gun or a weapon and “mouthing off” is all he got run in for and he was out in four hours? Sorry, I come from a FAMILY of cops. We don’t respect folks that do that and want props for it.
    If Crowley wants respect? Then why doesn’t he go run down a teenage drug suspect. On TV those guys run and jump like an NBA star or something. Then I’ll be impressed.
    Another point: Cambridge isn’t shit compared to Petworth, Columbia Heights, Congress Heights, Barry Farms, DC Village, Anacostia and parts of Prince George’s County in and around DC. Sorry. You and I both know diggity damn well that Harvard faculty and staff aren’t living in Bierut, so we can dispense with the “don’t be so sure that Cambridge isn’t a high crime area.” Officer Crowley wasn’t securing a hostile suspect with a weapon in a crack house that he hadn’t searched for weapons and/or other assailants. It’s laughable and it won’t stand up in court. My question to Crowley? “OK, Supercop, what was the result of the so-called search of the house? Once you found it secure, why didn’t you leave? You still didn’t feel safe? You’d swept for weapons, you had back-up inside and outside of the house. You’ve claimed that Gates was verbally abusive so you couldn’t have wanted to be there, he wasn’t serving tea and scones, so what were you waiting for?”
    This was a crap arrest. An arrest that is sullied by a backlash of O’Reilly/Limbaugh/Palin ball-riders against common sense. This wasn’t a common criminal to be feared. This was a citizen heatedly voicing his displeasure with the very “policing” that he pays for with his taxes which, I might add, is his right. People in Cambridge pay Officer Crowley’s salary. The people and the courts give Crowley the power to protect and serve. He wasn’t serving any purpose by sitting in wait to hear something to make him go through with an arrest.
    I once had a police officer bait me over a bogus traffic stop. He was looking for a 6′4″ dark skinned black man that weighed between 210 and 230 pounds. Wearing jeans, sneakers and a white t-shirt. He was in a white sedan heading north on Reno Rd NW. Suspect of stabbing someone. I was stopped in a blue coupe. I’m 5′9″ and I weigh 180. I’m light-skinned. I was getting off of work, and I was in a shirt, tie and dress shoes. I handed over my license and registration and asked why I was stopped. The bullshit then came out of the cop’s mouth as well as the attitude “You were stopped because there was a stabbing and we are stopping all suspects fitting the description.” Again, the stabbing occurred in the direction I was driving which, if a suspect were fleeing, he’d be heading the opposite way. No physical match—not even close. No match on the description of the car. As I missed the opening of the movie I was going to see that night (45 minute delay while they “checked my license and registration”) I asked if it would be possible that I could be cut loose. The officer said if I said another word, he’d run me in for insubordination. He yelled this in my face with spittle coming out of his mouth and it struck me flush in the face. I filed a civilian complaint and I was able to obtain an official apology from the force. The officer was censured in writing. (Don’t worry: a black guy didn’t get rich off of suing an urban police department.) The gist of it, from the review board, was that it’s one thing to come upon someone disorderly and take them in, it’s another thing to BAIT a citizen into a disorderly just so you can log a collar. For the good cops out there, it’s crap cops like that who make it hard for the guys trying to do right to gain traction in the community. Crowley, if he’s in a majority-white neighborhood doesn’t have much to worry about. But in a black neighborhood? He’d've likely done damage to where the community won’t help the cops out when they need them to. But, as an attorney, you already knew that. Why help a police force that will brutalize citizens (even the good ones) in the name of justice?
    Sorry, boss: there are too many decent black folks who’ve had experiences like this and worse. There are some punk-bitches with guns and badges. I cited Ryan Moats’ arresting officer. He’s rousted not only Moats and his wife but a white football player’s wife (she’s also black). I cited Oscar Grant in Oakland, shot for nothing. His disorderly conduct charge was trumped up to an execution-style slaying on a subway platform. The paramedics had to uncuff the man before they could try to treat him.
    If you want to defend these people, fine. Be a defense attorney or a PBA attorney. At this point, black folks are past the “fear” stage. We have an abiding sense of what’s going to happen to a black suspect and it’s rarely justice. Do I need to go into Mamadou Diallo? Abner Louima? Was his mouthing off to a police officer worth a punctured rectum due to forced sodomy with a broken-off mop handle? That piece of shit “officer” put the used end of it in Louima’s mouth. That’s called sadism, sir, not law enforcement. That’s what was done in the name of justice.
    Need I mention the Central Park Five? Used as fodder by Donald Trump for stricter penalties for youth offenders and it turned out: they didn’t attack the Central Park jogger. All those men served time. Susan Smith and Charles Stuart were able to dupe law enforcement into rousting random black men for crimes they couldn’t have committed. All those men detained and called criminals? Every cop on the force should’ve been made to go door-to-door to apologize face to face to those men. And their sons and daughters who saw their fathers likely get rousted.
    Crime is never going to stop. Criminals have their motivations. But why can’t we get cops from abusing citizens that didn’t commit a true crime? After all, the cops are supposed to be civilized, no?

  147. PatrickInBeijing wrote:

    One of the sad commentaries in this affair is that the President had to assume that most white folk would sympathize with the police officer. Clearly a sign that racism still is a major problem (but we knew that, didn’t we?).

    There are still some strange aspects about this whole thing. Why do the Cambridge police have a sergeant checking on a suspected B&E? Do they have that many of them? I always thought they were in charge of a whole bunch of officers (maybe the whole shift at a smaller station), and only went out on the important calls. Of course, he could have just been in the neighborhood.

    It would be interesting to see the police blog of this, and their radio communications. Why? Well, the building, as I understand it, is owned by Harvard. Generally, I would expect this to show up on the police computers when the call comes in. It might also show the tenant. If not, I would expect the officers to want to know from the Harvard Police who the tenant is (they would have the record). After all, wouldn’t you want to know who the tenant might be if you’re going into a possible situation where there might be a criminal and a tenant in the house?

    So, if people are going to pick on the details, there seem to be a number of strange questions unanswered (at least in my mind).

    But none of which changes the basic reality.

    Dr. Gates was arrested AFTER he had shown his ID, when it was clear that he was not a criminal.

    He was arrested because he was “loud and tumultuous” in the middle of the day on his own property???? Come on, this defies reason, except that….. oh yeah, he’s black.

  148. Phil Deeze wrote:

    For John Parker, Asianlawyer and the rest of the people defending police,
    Interesting article chronicling Boston and the history of the beat-down of one of its own undercover cops…..

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/20/AR2009072003216.html

    Never heard of this guy, have you? Didn’t think so.

  149. Phil Deeze wrote:

    Asianlawyer,
    Imagine the outcry from the “good people” that are defending the police if this blonde lady had been shot for “resisting” arrest—-a FALSE arrest, I might add.

    http://www.policeone.com/investigations/articles/1857461-Store-video-catches-Philly-cop-confronting-woman/

    When blonde women get shot, that must be scarier for some of you people (people that think like you do). Ensuing article also shows that the officer in question lied at the inquest and his colleagues tried to obtain and destroy the video tape. Looks like the convenience store uses DVR which likely can’t be erased on-site and isn’t stored on portable tapes.

    Great police work there. Another guy that shouldn’t have a badge and will likely continue to walk a beat. I hope you go to Philly and get into a fender-bender with his son like these folks did. I’d like to see you sit silently when someone walks behind you in a convenience store and accosts you like this officer did. You won’t be so eloquent then. That’s no insult to you, you’re only human.

  150. David Daniel wrote:

    The bottom line, after all else is said and done about James Crowley’s description of the events and Professor Gates’ description of the events, is that a black man, a highly recognized black scholar yet, was arrested for breaking into his own home. James Crowley should have approached Gates with courtesy and respect and a sensitivity to the situation. Racial profiling classes, like the ones Crowley teaches, should include sensitivity training. In addition, would the lady who called this in have been so quick if it was two white men on the porch?

  151. Multiracial Muse wrote:

    I got into an argument with a peer of mine at Harvard on our House’s mailing list over this case. It’s absolutely ridiculous how badly they treated Gates, and this peer of mine just keeps showing his privileged white @$$ in every assumption he makes. I’ve heard the same faulty arguments before, and I’m so tired of finding out my white acquaintances are so clueless.

  152. mT wrote:

    I don’t like how Obama had to back down and retract what he originally said. I understand for minorities, it’s all about picking your battles and living another day to fight the good fight. But two things with this. One, Obama is the president yet he still has to watch what he says a minority, and he can’t really speak the truth. Second, it is so great to be white and right in America. Now that’s white privilege when you can dictate what is and isn’t controversy in the news and when you can get the president to retract his words. White perspective, white denial, white logic, white power for the win.

    Oh and btw, now I know why Reggie Lewis the basketball player died. Was that just a joke?…maybe, maybe not…it makes you wonder though.

  153. ktrujillo wrote:

    Still think it’s weird that his name is JIM CROWley…

  154. Emmeaki wrote:

    c.n. edaw wrote:

    I’ve been in the car with my white male boyfriends when they’ve been stopped by the police. I’ve seen them be downright condescending to the officers, get snarky, angry, even curse. No one has ever hauled them off to jail. Sure they’ve paid some hefty tickets, but no one asks them to step out of the car…even with ME beside them, LOL!.

    This is just like a story my cousin told me. She was in the car with her boyfriend (he’s white and she’s black) and they were stopped by the cops.

    He had no license or registration and the courteous officer gave him a friendly reminder not to forget them next time. AND told him to have a nice day!

    He wasn’t dragged out the car and hauled off to jail. They didn’t search his car. (Thank god, because he had weed on him!) We all know how this might have ended if a black or Latino guy had been driving the car. It’s just a blatant double standard and it pisses me off.

  155. daniel cunningham wrote:

    Wow, weighing in late with this one.

    Where to start….

    First off, being rude is never excusable. The fact that it is a cop and he’s in your house doesn’t really excuse that.

    Sigh… but I’m white. As some posts have noted, being white and engaging with cops is different. I have to admit, I think this is true. I lived in DC and Baltimore for a while, and I had some uncomfortable experiences with cops with Indian and Black friends and acquaintances in the car. Of course, I had a few with just me in the car… but as a friend T used to quip, “PG cops are equal opportunity… they’ll beat anyone.”

    Sigh… I had a good friend from high school who had the exact same thing happen to him. Well, almost exactly. He actually was massively rude to the cops who came to his house after he and two friends broke into the back of his house… but I know how rude he could be.

    But rude does not equal having a gun pointed at you. (not in this case, but in Vs.) Similarly, it does sound, frankly, like Gates was an ass…. and I give cops a lot of leeway (I think), but that does not add up to arrest, I’m sorry.

    Not if you’re white.

    I’ve been arrested. I’ve seen that side of it, and I’d say, even so, it’s at least a 3-to-1 thing.

    I lived in Maryland for quite a number of years, and I was always happy when I helped get a black guy or whatever (acquaintance/friend) out of a ticket. But… to my white guys… that is such a devil’s bargain. You have no idea what you’re talking about if you haven’t seen it. The lot of you drive off into the night all “F’ yeah, dude!” but it leaves you feeling like, pardon me, a whore.

    No one wins.

    Do you all remember the Asimov quote? The opposite holds true, as well.

  156. daniel cunningham wrote:

    Second post: I really do not think the overtly angry posts serve much purpose beyond letting people let off steam, which I’ve been given to understand this blog is not about.

    I’m white, please refine your definition of race. It’s not acceptable for me to describe ‘all black males as angry’, and it is not acceptable for anyone to describe me as simply a ‘white, male’ and define therefore as being angry, racist, and aggressive.

    I’m merely angry and aggressive.

    :)

  157. TeeTee wrote:

    Hey everyone:

    For my perspective an unfortunate upshot of this is the realization that some people still think racial profiling doesn’t exist, that folks are impartial.

    http://www.thestar.com/article/671651

    Regardless of your “cred”, it’s never inappropriate to take a minute to “check your head”, imho. I have seen folks in the teaching profession “hand off” students in a heated situation that they know they are reacting to and cannot address impartially, police officers must also have the same type of plan.

    I can see how pride could have factored into the situation on both sides, which from my perspective is unfortunate. On the part of an officer who prides himself on being impartial, whose motives are called into question. On the part of an academic who prides himself on his achievement and the respect of his community, whose identity is suddenly reduced solely to his race.

    I still can’t get over Gates’ neighbor, who ostensibly should know him, calling the cops. I mean that speaks a lot to our societal dysfunction when you don’t recognize your neighbor and you also don’t feel comfortable in your *own* community to walk over and check it out, even at a distance. [All I had to to do foil a break-in of my own apartment's back door was hearing a tampering with the lock and a crackling noise, was smack the door from the inside and shout. And I was in my undies :-) ] Could a simple shouted query from across the street have averted the whole situation? Probably.

    It’s so sad that we’re becoming bereft of human agency and that we don’t really have ownership of our own communities.

    I am glad there’s such a healthy discussion going on here. Thanks to everyone who posted their personal experiences, I think we all need to hear them. I find that every contributor to these comments has added something, even comments I personally disagree with have helped to flesh out the discussion.

    Don’t ever stop! We need to work these things out in our community.

  158. Steve Austin wrote:

    I haven’t read all the posts, so maybe this has been mentioned already: I believe that this is all a diversion to get the public’s attention away from the Obama Health Care bill that he is trying to ram through Congress. With all the vitriol that this issue beings forth (on both sides of the topic), who is paying due attention to the Obama Ramrod Express, trying to push the vote before the August recess. All bills need to be read before voting, but especially this one which would change American live for ever. The Obama Bill, if passed, wont even go into effect until 2013, so what’s the rush?? Could it be that Obama doesn’t WANT the bill read before the vote?

  159. atlasien wrote:

    @Steve Austin:

    OK, it all makes sense now.

    Officer Crowley, fanatical Obamabot (and incapable of unfeigned racism… after all, he performed CPR on Reggie Lewis!) worked it all out in advance with Gates and the neighbor, Lucia Whalen. The 911 dispatching office was also in on the deal. In fact, the only person who didn’t know what was going on was the cabdriver.

    The entire arrest was carefully choreographed for maximum outrage and maximum believability. The original plan called for Crowley to taser Gates and then beat him with his own cane, but Obama made the decision, much to Gates’ relief, to tone the incident down a notch.

    And the Obama Ramrod Express rolls on. MUAHAHA!

    For the next stage, Maya Angelou has secretly volunteered to be attacked by a SWAT team.

  160. Fiqah wrote:

    @atlasien:

    *DEAD*

  161. Mapleblack wrote:

    Just to add.. I saw a piece in the NY Times stating that on the 911 tape. The neighbor was pressed for a description of the race of the two men. She also mentioned that they might be living there as they had suitcases but barged the door. she wasn;t sure but called anyway. she also thought that one of the men was Hispanic and the other she couldn’t say for sure. Actually sounds like a pretty decent neighb or to me.

  162. Steve Austin wrote:

    Atlasien: I enjoy your sardonic humor; keep up the good work!

    However, if it wasn’t for this highly fortituous event, ‘The Obama Express’ would have used some other issue…

    Thought for the Day: There are none so blind as those who will not see.

  163. Emmeaki wrote:

    Apparently it isn’t over:

    Justin Barrett, Boston Police Officer, Suspended For Calling Gates A “Jungle Monkey” In E-mail:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/29/justin-barrett-boston-pol_n_247405.html

  164. Emmeaki wrote:

    Who the hell do these cops think they are?

    Disorderly Conduct: Conversation About Gates Arrest Precedes Arrest

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/29/disorderly-conduct-conver_n_246794.html

  165. Celeste wrote:

    I don’t like how it’s okay for Obama to call black people out for our shortcomings, however if he calls out someone white, that’s not okay. He’s read the riot act to the black community repeatedly but if he says anything about white racism he has to take it back, that’s a bunch of crap. The only reason why he commented on this case is because Gates is his friend, I don’t remember him making any commentary after Oscar Grant was killed. He probably had to dial back for the focus to go back to healthcare which on the whole is a more important issue than Gates specific incident is. I guess there ’s room for police racism under the bus even with marriage equality and immigration reform already residing there.