Interview with The Perverted Negress

By Sexual Correspondent Andrea Plaid

A while ago, Latoya Peterson, and I offered a two-fer about the Ciara/Justin Timberlake video, “Love Sex Magic.” The image of Timberlake pulling Ciara’s dog leash brought up the idea of “race play” and racism. Sexologist Bianca Laureano suggested that I talk to MollenaMollena, a expert on race play, about it. (This interview’s entirety is posted at Mollena’s blog, The Perverted Negress.)

Andrea:   What is race play?

Mo:  I define “Race Play,” In broad terms, as any type of play that openly embraces and explores the (either “real” or assumed) racial identity of the players within the context of a BDSM scene. The prime motive in a “Race Play” scene is to underscore and investigate the challenges of racial or cultural differences.

Andrea:  Would you mind giving an example of race play?

Mo:  There are the obvious ones. We in the US like to think we have cornered the market on racial politics. So, obviously, people go for Antebellum South slavery stuff. But even there, there are many variations: you can have the White master/Black slave thing. You can have a “tables-turned” scenario, with a slave seducing the master, blackmailing them. The “Mandingo” black stud thing. And let us not forget we [Black folks] owned one another. And let us not forget the skin color caste system! “High yellow” versus dark skinned….

This expands to a lot of sins in this country: Whites [and] Native Americans; the internment camps where we packed up Japanese Americans.

But it isn’t just us….how about a captured Iraqi prisoner tortured by Marines? Or a Sinn Féin extremist being interrogated by a rogue SIS agent? Or a dark skinned Indian person avenging themselves on a lighter-skinned higher-caste individual? North [and] South Koreans. Hutu [and] Tutsi…

The only limit is your imagination.

This is part of the reason I boggle at the knee-jerk reaction people have. The fact that something is scary, dangerous, real: why does this mean you should not explore it? For fuck’s sake, driving a car is dangerous. Falling in love is dangerous. Understanding that part of the draw, to me, of BDSM is that it tests my fortitude in this body and in this mind and with this heat is what keeps me doing it. How the fuck am I going to let something stop me because it is scary?

Andrea:  But we both know folks aren’t going to see it that way. They want to use that very real painful history to not think of it as fantasy fodder.

Mo:  Sure. And more power to them. Not everyone volunteers to be hit with a whip traveling at the speed of sound either. But I do it because it fascinates me.

Andrea:  But, I suspect, is some folks give it *too* much power. They use it as a way to police the desires of others. As you saw on the threads for my and Latoya’s posts.

Mo:  And I understand that. But the root of all of that is fear. Straight up. Fear that you will be judged by the acts of others. Fear that there is something out there you cannot understand. Also, fear that it fascinates you, and that perhaps you are “one of those perverts.” That is often a deep rooted factor, too.

Mo:  I have a very high capacity for empathy. Which is great! However. It doesn’t discriminate. I can empathize with MANY types of people, even those some would consider evil, [l]ike sadists. SO I can explore that in the relatively safe corral of BDSM, and see how it is to be aroused by the pain of others.

….

Mo:  The idea that someone might hate you PURELY because of your identity is horrific. [I]t dehumanizes you, and it makes you “less than.” So, in the context of BDSM, it is fair game for that type of play.

Andrea:  And words like “normal”–as in “normal” sex, which some folks wouldn’t consider BDSM and race play–get employed to convey “good.”

Mo:  Right. If you do that “kinky shit” you CANNOT, by definition, be mentally sound. Or you have some agenda.

Andrea:  Like not uplifting The Race! (Insert PoC group here)

Mo:  Yeah.

My vagina isn’t really interested in uplifting the race. What pussy wants is fucked up stuff, really dark scenarios that test the boundaries and cut with an exhilarating level of danger. Stepping razor dangerous, like the song goes.

Andrea:  Next question: how is race play similar and different from BDSM? If it is any different?

Mo:  It isn’t different from BDSM, it is an aspect of BDSM. It can encompass many different aspects. Obviously, role-playing comes to mind. In the same way that a pair of 6″ stilettos and a pair of flip flops are both shoes, race play and a spanking, for example, can all be aspects of BDSM. But different types of people are going to find either one sexier. The vast majority of kinky people would never admit to dong racially based play or fantasizing about it because of the PC thing. My thinking is this: in the same way pendulums have to swing to reach equilibrium, the BDSM community has to breathe around this aspect of Kink.

And as to those who are non-kink identified….it is even more challenging. They have a double hurdle: “Grokking” kink at ALL, then groking one of the MOST controversial types of play.

Andrea:  That gets read on the outside of the communities that white folks want to re-enact slavery again and BDSM may be that vehicle. Ergo, “keep BDSM away!”

Mo:  Yeah, because kink is a gateway drug for racism. Please.

Andrea:  What I’m running into is people want to do those things and use 1)white folks, 2) the ancestors, and 3) the [children] as their reasoning to not even think about the issue.

Mo:  Most “white folks” (meaningless term, blah blah) are more uncomfortable around this than you know. And I have spoken with the ancestors. They are delighted that I can fucking choose to do this for a few bloody hours. I can go into the Big Ass Ice Cream Parlor of Racism and have a sample spoon, and leave. I’m not trapped there being force fed the Rocky Road Ice Cream of Oppression until I am sick. It is all about choice.

Andrea:  And consent.

Mo:  I hope people fucking get that. Understand this one thing and then you’ll be well on the pathway.

Look, I have never lived in the South on a plantation and felt the terror of my life every moment at the hands and whims of an owner or of another slave with an agenda. However, I can pretend. And, in a very real emotional sense, I have tasted what that is like. It is a screaming band of pain that still resonates in this country, on this fucking planet, you know. But it is just under the radar. I can hear it when I play there. I experience it. It is a terror that I can’t completely understand. But one thing I learned in this play: resistance is harder than it looks.

Andrea:  Then the question comes back: “But *why* would you want to do that? Can’t you just look at lynching picture and get the damn point?” (I’m being facetious…and to some folks, quite blasphemous. But I’m going there….)

Mo:  Why is because I live viscerally. I obtain a profound benefit to living the reality as deeply as I can emotionally. In the race play scenes I have done that involved black / white dynamics, do you know what the scariest thing was? That I ultimately gave up. I am NOT of the resistant blood. I’m a quitter. I was afraid, I gave in. That is a lot to have about your nature revealed.

Andrea:  What did it reveal?

Mo:  That I am, at heart, obedient. Even in a scene where I had disassociated and genuinely feared for my life, I gave up. I’m genuinely, at the core, submissive in a way I am certain does not translate to my present-day self! I hoped it would be quick and over fast.

Andrea:  Obedient…to whom?

Mo:  Obedient to authority.

Andrea:  I think I’m getting it…grokking it.

Mo:  *LOL* Win! We all like to think we’d be Kunta fucking Kinte–

Andrea:  ‘Cause that’s the narrative we’re fed from yea-high. “We gotta be strong in the face of whitey, y’all”

Mo:  Sure, go ahead and be strong in the face of whitey. But if you get hot because whitey has beaten your ass and taken you down…but you endured….then you have a whole new lease on life, man. In honesty, there were millions of us enslaved by a few hundred thousand people. Jews were systematically destroyed by Nazis in camps where there were many, many more prisoners than guards.

Andrea:  I remember someone saying the biggest damage the Nazis did to Jews was psychological.

Mo:  It is true they had people walk to their own deaths. Fucking horrific. And yet if someone of Jewish descent wants to have a Nazi interrogation scene, to sip a bit of that bitter, bitter cup, who the fuck are you to say that is wrong?

Doing race play is HARD. It isn’t some walk in the fucking park. And finding people I trust enough to do it with is almost impossible because it is hard, and they are at risk.

Andrea:  It’s like we hold the painful history as a sacred mythology that is not to be blasphemized.

Mo:  But it is not blasphemy to want to touch that wound. You can’t heal something in your soul by letting it remain in its original state of pain. It HAS to be touched. Otherwise it will never heal.

Andrea:  And being as puritanical as we are about sex, we wield that history when it comes to our sex lives–the double bind.

Mo:  I am not recommending that people run out and play aunt Jemima Uncle Tom games with any random [White person], for the love of Ganesha. I’m saying that, if this intrigues you, think about why. And I am saying it if repulses you, think about why–really think. Don’t do some knee-jerk bullshit.

And Black folks in the US are not known for being sexually liberated. Which is why the hypersexualization of our imagery over the years is a double helix of irony.

Andrea:  But that wound also gives us an identity. And, like I’ve said to folks before, we love self-mythologies, sacred stories we tell about ourselves.

Next question (and we sorta touched on this)–why do you think communities of color, specifically Black communities, feel the need to police their desires…to the point they won’t explore sexual/erotic practices that some folks deem “racially incorrect”? And, more importantly, play police for The Race?

Mo:  There is certainly the aspect of our very conservative and deeply religious background. We have a strong church-based community–that isn’t something that is easy to shake. The fact is that we have put ourselves in a position where we have to “prove ourselves” in order to survive. From jump, we’ve been at a disadvantage here. So now that we’ve reached a point where we actually have a fighting chance, people don’t want anything that may jeopardize or mitigate, in THEIR eyes, our position of moral superiority. It is the idea we are “above” that.

Andrea:  ::nods head:: And we do that by saying certain sexual practices, like BDSM and race play, are the things that “white folks do” or “what white folks want us to do.”

Mo:  Exactly. So we deny ourselves the very fucking freedoms that our ancestors, or parents and grandparents struggled to give us. Freedom has no business being compartmentalized so that it remains frozen in some idealized space. Freedom is messy.

Andrea:  The interracial history, esp. when it comes to fucking, is so fraught that we’d think “folks” would look at the Ciara/Justin Timberlake vid[eo] and think, “He’s oppressing her, and she likes it. Gahh!” and clutch their pearls.

Mo:  Yeah. OK. SO? The part here where you have all the info you need is this: “And she likes it.” The “why” is none of your fucking business–in this case, the “why” is purely money.

Andrea:  What? Mollena, that’s racial blasphemy.

Mo:  I know, I know. I feel us slipping back to the 1950s every time I masturbate. It is a huge burden, really.

The one thing–the only thing–that separates BDSM from abuse is consent. Now, there is implied consent. However, at no point is [there] not [sic] control. Never.

Dominants can wear what they want and do what they want. The idea of teasing with the body can have a dominant tone. What bugs me is that it is “OK of the black person is dominant but “NOT UPLIFTING THE RACE!!” if she’s submissive. I have gotten shit from black dominants about race play–even as they top white submissives.

I’ve had people who I know for a FACT do race play fuck me over in public for doing it in public. But it is OK for them to do it, just not OK for people to know about it.

Andrea:  Jeez…even in race play there the “We gotta be strong–in this case, top white folks?”

Mo:  Yes. Payback, you see. We aren’t getting reparations, so go beat up some White [person] and get yours.

Andrea:  And, it’s up to *you* to keep my image up. SMH

Mo:  Exactly, because then, of course, all White people will feel all PoCs are fair game…but the thing is this:  ignorant fuckers have been doing inappropriate shit for years. Is it possible that talking about it makes it bloody fucking clear that it is never OK to make that assumption? But when I get a message form a POC who says to me “I thought I was the only one, thank you for talking about that, I felt terrible!” it is worth it. Truly.

Andrea:  Guuuuuuuuurl. ::fist pump::

Mo:  Really. I have, in my 12 years, had one person say to me “I wanna do a race play scene with you.” ONE. Why is that? 1) I am, evidently, hella intimidating (which kinda sucks but that is another discussion), 2) I live in CA, where the PC thing is strong, and 3) I make it bloody fucking clear it is not acceptable for you to ever ask someone to bottom to you in that type of scene. I feel it really has to come from the person being the “victim.” This is my approach. If they are doing it in their heads anyway, best to know WHO those people are, right?

Sure, people get ideas. But if you think denial and silence will crush desire–

Andrea:  But ideas don’t equal actions.

Mo:  All you have to do is look at a few numbers on the porn industry.

Mo:   Ideas CAN move to action.

Mo:  But I am not responsible for anything except living an ethical life, being true to my God, and respecting this planet and her inhabitants–the rest is outside of my control. And those who would be The Race Police can take a fucking page from the Serenity prayer. Grab some wisdom. You are never going to change the way people are wired.

Andrea:  People act as if the ideas will run tsunami-like and overtake them. Thus, Timberlake and Ciara are making it open season on white men (and PoC men) to put dog collars on Black women. It’s like, dudes, no. It’s not.

Mo:  You canchange your attitude and judgments around other folk’s desires, and choice.

–[and] send them my way, please, those hot white men looking to stalk and tackle Negresses. I got a boot handy for them.

Andrea:  Last of my questions (again, we touched on it, but for the record)–how can we move the conversation within our communities so we can talk about BDSM and race play as sexual/erotic possibilities?

Mo:  Yeah. there is the rub. First off: people who do play this way have to come out of the closet. Until players stand up, there will be a continued marginalization–and that there is the easy part.

The harder part is having people within the community put down the “Us vs.Them” thing. It can’t be all about being apart from our desires because they are scary–there has to be room in the dungeon for everyone’s emotional play. Every person who is ashamed of their desires is anther person we damage indirectly with our scathing commentary and harsh judgments–

Andrea:  –or the desires may make “those folks” think you’re fulfilling stereotypes.

Mo:  Whether or not you are fulfilling stereotypes, this is beside the question. I know this is nuanced, but it is critical: all stereotypes are based on facts and observations that have been bred and fed to damage and wound and kill. If you take that snarling dog, that offensive beast, and tame it to your own ends, you win.

The hardest part is taking yourself out of your comfort zone, thinking differently–

Andrea:  –to talk about kink and BDSM and race play if not do it.

Mo:  Yes. And to listen to those who are dumb enough to expose themselves to threats and ostracization and loss of friends and ridicule and psychological dissection. Who is more racially sound? The person who melts down and freaks out and blows up because someone calls them a nigger? Or the person who, on hearing that epithet, knows that they have been given the gift of information? Knowing that an ugliness has been revealed, and now you can act accordingly? Those words don’t control me anymore. I am not immune to racism. But I’ve been inoculated, and my soul can fight off that spiritual infection. I think THAT is overcoming.

….

Andrea:  Now let me get this right: it’s wrong to ask [to assumptively ask about domming or subbing in race play] because….

Mo:  For me, I feel it is wrong to ask because I now know you want this specific thing, and I have to trust that you don’t have creepy ass motives. And for me, it is important for me to suss the person out without this in their head or my head. I need to just feel them emotionally. Then, if the thought occurs to me, “Hey…they might be kinda good with that…,” then I drop the hankie, as it were.

Andrea:  I think I’m getting it…it’s an assumption about you’re not being indiscriminate about how who you’d play with.

Mo:  Right. If you assume that I’ll do that with you, I kind of use that as a litmus test.

Andrea:  It’s like, “I’d know you’re into it, and I’m into it, so I know you want me (strange person off the streets) to play with you.” And your reaction is, “Ummmm…do I know you like that? Just because I’m into race play doesn’t mean I wanna play with *you*.”

Mo:  EXACTLY–and I stress that really really hard when I teach for the fact is most PoCs don’t wanna go there.

To my critics, I say “Look, this is the alpha and omega when I present.”

Andrea:  You mean the PoCs who are into race play?

Mo:  No. To the PoCs who do not think it is OK. Their position is well diagrammed in my presentations. So [zie’s] position is well represented. Really.

Now excuse me while this white guy ties me up and slices my clothes off.

Andrea:  Got it. it’s the same argument [some] folks on the Racialicious threads tried to present: “Ciara and JT have declared open season on interracial kink! Those bastards!”

Mo:  Good for them.  Sex is sexy. It is sometimes fucked up–and that is also sexy.

_______________________________________________________

*Grok(king): “to understand so thoroughly that the observer becomes a part of the observed-to merge, blend, intermarry, lose identity in group experience. It means almost everything that we mean by religion, philosophy, and science-and it means as little to us (because of our Earthly assumptions) as color means to a blind man.”

________________________________________________________

Image Credit: Mollena/Self-Portrait

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Diversity Is the Spice of Life…Unless You’re the Spice | Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 08 Sep 2009 at 10:01 am

    [...] before people start saying “race play” like it’s a new word learned on Jeopardy! and hoping to use as a hip point at said Anti-Racism [...]

  2. Mollena Williams ~ The Full Monty! « Mollena’s Blog on 09 Sep 2009 at 6:48 pm

    [...] been interviewed by Sharon Glassman for The Huffington Post as well as by Angela Plaid for Racialicious. My blog, The Perverted Negress, has been a featured blog on Fleshbot (not Once but TWICE!) as well [...]

Comments

  1. foshothoyo wrote:

    a fine rationalization for “race play” in the context of personal bdsm activities.

    however, the reason why race play is purportedly enjoyable as fantasy is for the very reason that it is based on REAL f-ed up experiences of real people, including the “ancestors” (o, hai – can i get their cell number by the way?)

    Which means that for a holocaust survivor, say, to witness nazi/jew “fantasy” isn’t really play to them because it WAS real and horrifying. The memories and the horror preclude “exploration” because they’ve already been pushed way past their comfort level in terms of power relations.

    Now, you can’t say that anything somebody chooses to do with their own bodies without infringing on others rights is wrong, but we are not talking about personal behavior. We are talking about a mass-marketed product. They aren’t doing this in the privacy of their bedroom, this was probably not even their idea to start with. This was thought about and focus-grouped and put out there to sell an album.

    In the realm of racism it is too easy to go from the “razor’s edge” of fantasy to the all-too-real jugular gash of reality. As i’m sure you well know, these “creepy ass motives” you allude to do exist, and are the unspoken counterargument of this whole BDSM-as-liberation thread (i.e. that people really do get hurt/exploited/abused, though it may not have happened to you *yet*)

    Because the truth is that yes, there are those who abuse themselves without understanding why, or allow others to abuse them and call it consent. That is what makes this whole thing a big mess, what makes it difficult to have any hard-line, cut-and-dry moral stance on the whole issue of mass marketed race play, or sub/dom in general. Liberation or ignorance? Pleasure or abuse? Exploration or imprisonment?

    As a marketing gimmick, i think it is distasteful and crass, and I think it has less to do with “uplifting the race” as it does “I want to vomit because it reminds me of how disgusting my and my loved ones’ experiences of racism have been.” Also “how dare warner brothers or viacom or whoever pitched this shitshow have the gall to market this garbage to me as a viewer, and also every pair of eyes who has a television in their house”

    But that’s just me.

    As a personal practice, i could honestly care less, but I think that only considering race play as a bedroom jaunt is missing 14/15ths of the issue.

  2. Constance wrote:

    Oooh, I feel so much better about some of the things I wanted to do with my white ex boyfriend. Unfortunately or fortunately, he was way to timid to go there. LOL! Great post.

  3. cocolamala wrote:

    I recall a brouhaha in Europe about a powerful man, (he has a high position on the european racing commission or something like that) who was exposed as hiring ppl to do Nazi based race play with him. Everyone was scandalized and speculating about if he’d loose his job. Here’s a link to an article about that scandal.

    on the other hand, there’s also a Nazi-porn market in Israel

  4. Vanessa wrote:

    Wonderful, wonderful interview. I just want to say a huge THANK YOU to Mollena for her honesty and courage. It isn’t easy to speak such controversial personal truths, but it is NECESSARY, and gives others courage as well. I have so much respect for you.

  5. Deena wrote:

    The sex/sexuality posts have been fantastic. Thank you, Andrea and Mo, for talking about things that people do not want to say out loud and exploring all of the dirty, delicious complexity.

  6. Joseph wrote:

    “But it is not blasphemy to want to touch that wound. You can’t heal something in your soul by letting it remain in its original state of pain. It HAS to be touched. Otherwise it will never heal.”

    Quoted for truth.

    Cocolamala is right: there is a market or Holocaust porn in Israel. Without delving too deeply into those particular dynamics it is possible to say generally that one response to deep trauma is to bring it into a realm where it can be explored under safe circumstances. For some people sex and sexuality is that place. I agree with foshotyo that the reason it is taboo-hot for some people is because of how horrible actual racism is. But I seriously doubt that racism flows from the bedroom on to the street: that just doesn’t make any sense.

    Great, great interview Andrea.

  7. distance88 wrote:

    Master Vs. Slave?

    Sinn Fein Vs. SIS?

    Iraqi prisoner Vs. U.S. Marine?

    Hutu Vs. Tutsi?

    It’s hard to tell if she’s describing race play or Stockholm syndrome.

  8. Lady V wrote:

    Wow. Wow! Thank you so much for going there and taking us there. I am a Latina who loves to top thick white men and be topped by my big black boyfriend.

    From the bottom of my kinky heart,

    Lady V

  9. Jaleesa wrote:

    De-lurking myself to comment. Thanks for posting this interview, it intrigued me.

    I don’t understand the basis of x’ing something out because it has painful origins. I’ve not played in a BDSM context, but I’m of the belief that the best way for me to deal with anything painful (whether personal or on a community level) is to explore it directly and drop the “if it’s painful, it’s wrong and is gonna eat me alive if I go near it!!!” meme.

    People are too afraid of chaos and how it can change things for the better, and I feel that it’s sad. Stuff like this removes boundaries and invites chaos, and I think that’s what scares people. I think as humans we’re hardwired to be afraid of it, but what does fear save us from in this context?

  10. A wrote:

    Interesting. But I think it’s quite possible for a Person of Color who gets off on such things to examine such actions and come to the conclusion that it is not healthy to their overall self-image as an individual. I think most of us will accept that media and other societal influences do shape us, often in ways that are more harmful and damaging to our relationships than helpful – so I think a critical lens can and should be applied to practices that occur in the bedroom as well. Not to pass judgment on what another person finds healing and empowering, but I don’t believe that all of the coping mechanisms we develop in order to deal with things are ultimately helpful to us. But of course, that’s a value judgment, though one that I hope people do seriously consider.

    I do have to wonder though, because my anti-racist sensibilities lead me to believe that this would be a major inconsistency, to simply relegate it to the realm of the bedroom without any critical thought [which is not of course what the author is advocating] – but if a white male for example gets off on a form of race play that reproduces societal inequalities, even if only for a limited time in the bedroom, is there any basis from which to tell him off? What about the pedophile sex tourist? Or guys like chinabounder and the mr. ‘playing brazil’ who was mentioned a few weeks ago? If they’re having safe consensual sex with women, even if they are objectifying them and reducing them to sexualized racialized stereotypes, is there any moral basis from which to make a judgment? Does it matter if it stays in the bedroom? And does it ultimately matter if the person identifies as anti-racist, racist, or somewhere in between? What if it’s done with a consenting partner who perhaps doesn’t consider their race ‘a big deal’ and simply indulges him in such fantasies?

    I feel like such forms of play have an inevitable effect on people in much the way that violent degrading porn that objectifies women changes the ways in which men and boys fundamentally see women and their relationships with them…even as they tell themselves that porn is simply a fantasy, even as we tell ourselves ‘it’s just a movie’ yet appreciate a good cinematic experience that allows us to all but ‘but there.’

  11. Erika wrote:

    I think exploring themes with a painful history can be kinda disrespectful when done in a BDSM context…it’s about getting off, isn’t it? I definitely wouldn’t want to enact Japanese American internment o___O while my great aunts and uncles are still alive…
    It’s one thing to have a POC be a submissive slave to a white dominant, but I will draw the line at re-enacting slave rapes or whatever. It just seems distasteful to me. And it’s not like I’m a prude, either. Trust me on that.

  12. Lila wrote:

    I took the Implicit Association test for Race (’Black – White’ IAT), https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/

    It said I had a slight bias against Blacks. Then I spent 20 min reading about important Black Americans in history. I took the test again and no bias was detected. Then I watched some porn that was pretty much like the race play described in this article. I took the test again, and it showed a moderate bias against Blacks. That’s more bias than the first time I took it.

  13. chairo wrote:

    To be honest this reminds me of another topic that has been talked about on Racialicious; racial comedy.

    Whats often cited by “un pc” white comedians in defense of their “ironic” comedy is that the people (minorities) finding it hard to stomach their act are just afraid of having a dialogue on the subjects raised in their act.
    Explain how sarah silverman is having a constructive discussion about race. It’d be naive to assume that white audiences members out there that defend this type of humour dont see it as a opportunity to just indulge in whats usually at the substratum.

    Why wouldnt the same apply to race play?

    when misogynistic comedians “tell it as it is” about women we know that men in the audience who are nodding and laughing are probably concurring with the “guy not afraid to speak the truth”.

    and we have to think about the power dynamics here as well and the obvious that a lot o this ironic racism is largely aimed at laughing at “zany” “dangerous” “lazy” minorities. The audience for this is clearly not minorities; why would we want to constantly have these observations thrown at us.

    I’m not telling anyone they shouldnt do what they want to do, but i find it very naive of POC participants in race play to truly believe that in most cases both partners will understand completely the intention here. Many would find themselves hard pressed to articulate the intention in a sentence.

    race play seems as healthy a way of “touching the wound” and dealing with racism as family guy or vice magazine is.

  14. Medusa wrote:

    I heard about this stuff a couple of years ago, and as Black woman who has participated with a previous partner in BDSM , I did have a visceral, knee-jerk reaction at that time. I wouldn’t ever consider it, because I prefer to resolve my issues with racism from the ground up so to speak–with my own thoughts about myself. “Thought “color everything you do, inside and outside the bedroom.

    However, I realize that a lot of people have wounds (racially, emotionally, etc) that do not respond to what people conceive of as “standard” treatment (therapy, counseling, prayer, what have you). Perhaps for some POC who participate in this type of BDSM play, this is akin to some form of “primal scream” therapy…it’s ugly, messy, chaotic, and dangerous—but some people need to go to that brink to heal themselves.

    And I stress SOME people. With psycho-sexual activity as volatile as this stuff, there will always be people who will use this as some form of ego gratification; be that one’s racial ego, gender ego, socioeconomic ego, religious ego-be they a top or bottom.

    From the interview, I understand her reasons for doing it, and if it makes her more comfortable in her own skin as a POC, more power to her. Marketing or promoting this as a panacea for racial complexes? No way.

  15. funguy wrote:

    Why can’t there be BDSM without bringing race into it? Are interracial couples not allowed to practice BDSM because it might be offensive to some people?

  16. EGhead wrote:

    The irony that this was posted right after the rant about racist porn….is… too much to bear….

  17. Medea wrote:

    I think there’s a difference between private race play and commercialized race play. What Ciara likes to do in her bedroom is one thing; making a music video that glamorizes domination by a white man for mass consumption is another.

  18. AJ Plaid wrote:

    Thanks to everyone for your responses! And for keeping this civil. Let me get to some of the responses:

    @Joseph, Deena, and Lady V–thanks for the compliments!

    @Medea–in the extended version of this interview (linked at the beginning of the post), Mollena made a good point about what she saw in Ciara/Justin Timberlake video: that it wasn’t race play or particularly BDSM. Just because the couple involved was a interracial couple (and a couple with a white man in it) didn’t mean that race play was going on or that the white man was the dominant in the situation–so glamorization of a white male dom may not be going on. (Dom/mes of any race or ethnic group can wear collars in BDSM.) She observed that the BDSM elements were a cheat because BDSM is still viewed in certain quarters as taboo.

    distance88–thanks for the comment, but race play is vastly different than the Stockholm Syndrome. If I’m not mistaken, a sub/dom is a relationship depends upon consent; a hostage/captor relationship does not.

    @foshothoyo, A., Erika, chairo, Medusa–OK. The best way to address your comments is to pull something I wrote in my post on Audre Lorde. Please forgive the length of the quote, but it articulates my disagreements with your statements:

    So, no, every White person or woman (and man) of color are moving, living people existing in this Otherland where whites (and even other PoCs) are inherently entitled to enact, and get us to enact, all those sexual things “they’ve heard about us or seen us do” (implication: the person saw some porn) without our saying that that’s what we want to do. However, we PoCs can’t front as if there is/are some unattainable PoC sexual expressions and acts that we continue to be deprived of since the arrival, installation, and maintenance of, to borrow from Lorde, “European-American male tradition” that lie outside of this system and its worldview. We also can’t police and shun consenting adults within and outside our racial and ethnic groups because they’re participating in safer consensual sex that makes us squick and use The Group as justification to criticize them and, by extension, defend our discomfort. We can’t use another group to dictate how we’ll sexually conduct ourselves because we fear we’ll be responsible in perpetuating stereotypes, either.

    PoCs, for example, can’t start invoking the ancestors (or the children), The Race, or White people—including explicitly or implicitly saying that doing such acts means the participant isn’t “down with the Race”–when our PoC pals confide in us that they’re down with, say, rimming or race play in order to shame our friends out of what gets them off. I know the intention is to protect our friends and oppressed communities from disparagement and other negative ramifications. This thinking, combined with our understandable sensitivities to a groups’ historical sexual imageries have created and are still being perpetuated, coupled with their attendant harm, may give us the idea that, as members of those communities at whom these images and ideas are aimed, the prerogative to tell our friends to not jeopardize themselves and our groups. I fear that, when we do this, what we sacrifice is our unique sexual selves. I believe the most we can say to zie is, “Hey, it’s not me, but do you. And are you being safe with this, like using dental dams or having a safe word?” Going on and on about how wrong you and, by some self-appointed proxy, The Group, thinks of “such things” may have the intended effect of dampening…more than likely, your friend in confiding you again.

    Now, that doesn’t mean that everyone of a particular group wants to hear your, ahem, love for them. It’s not cool, for example, a white guy to approach a random Latina at the park or the club and proceed to say all sorts of stereotype-based things about his Chicana sex partner. Trust, more than likely talking like that is not making her want to befriend or turning her on. Her being Latina is not the cue to roll up like that—and the speaker’s race or ethnic group is not an excuse, either. Such talk flattens her–and the speaker’s–humanities.

  19. AJ Plaid wrote:

    Oh! And one more thing I want to add that seems to be getting lost in this thread. As Mollena says in the OP:

    I am not recommending that people run out and play Aunt Jemima/Uncle Tom games with any random [White person], for the love of Ganesha. I’m saying that, if this intrigues you, think about why. And I am saying it if repulses you, think about why–really think.

  20. MoeHailstone wrote:

    Distance 88 nailed it!!! This is Stockholm Syndrome….

    I’m into BDSM and to understand it to certain depth is one thing but this was deeper than surface psychological indulgance.

  21. EGhead wrote:

    @Medea

    I’m sorry but I think it’s a distinction without a difference. These are not separate, insular sexual spheres and to pretend otherwise is just being willfully ignorant.

  22. Chairo wrote:

    I’m I alone in finding Mo’s “i’m so in your face right now, don’t even think about breathing. ” attitude profoundly ugh.

    I can’t stand the irreverence it just feels really infantile. If an educated black woman told me she liked to simulate slave sex with her white male partner i wouldn’t be offended, probably shocked and saddened. But after a bit more thought and having taken into account y’know western society the past 500 years or so and mainstream culture i’d get why.

    I think a lot of this is really pretentious justifications for wanting something that brings a lot of shame once it’s admitted.

    “nah nah we’re being cerebral about it so we’re not giving into dominant culture’s idea of their own superiority”
    this applies not only to the black white dichotomy

    I feel like in this discussion we’ve been dressing up something very self-indulgent as some kind of poignant journey of self-discovery and spiritual emancipation.
    This is all about indulgence; just like spending a day eating ice cream is about indulgence). Race play Is not a discussion. Collectively It has no direction. Its sex with people indulging in racial fetishes, which society has left them with.
    None of us can know what most people honestly feel about the subject; MO included.

    In this discussion I feel like i’m staring at a hot mess
    which makes brings back a memory i have of being in a discussion with a close black female friend who told me her middle class south asian friend from Australia prefers white guys who have the “aryan look”
    and another friend of hers whos middle class black and educated and only wants an abercrombie and fitch white guy.
    What i couldnt fathom is why was her selection so damn specific; no asian guys, no latinos, no midditeraneans nothing but a specific portion of the white male population: nordic white dudes.
    My friend is pretty much convinced she seeks validation from that kind of partner and i can’t help but agree. With this subject i see the opposite; POC women masochistically surrendering to white men.
    or white women surrending to a stereotyped idea of POC men.
    etc

    “I think exploring themes with a painful history can be kinda disrespectful when done in a BDSM context…it’s about getting off, isn’t it? I definitely wouldn’t want to enact Japanese American internment o___O while my great aunts and uncles are still alive…”
    totally agree

  23. Erika wrote:

    Maybe I just didn’t think BDSM or any type of “play” is serious stuff; I considered it as something that’s being done for pleasure, and not as something therapeutic. If race play in some way helps you (general) as a person, good for you. Otherwise, I wouldn’t want to see someone re-inact internment camps or what-have-you purely for sexual reasons. I think it’s insulting to my history.

  24. Ellie Araña wrote:

    Great post! It is wonderful to see someone shedding light on the BDSM community, and the race play that goes on. I agree with you wholeheartedly! BDSM, after all is about exploring taboos. It is about facing your shame, and your fear and turning it on it’s head. Thus, by putting our fears into an enjoyable context, we are overcoming them. Sort of like the way traumatized children play out the scenario that scares them, until they can move on. We can reconcile our collective, inherited, trauma through play.

    “I think exploring themes with a painful history can be kinda disrespectful when done in a BDSM context…it’s about getting off, isn’t it? ”

    Most PoC’s I know, have deep issues with race and identity. I know I do, as a mixed Hispanic. I can see where some might see it as disrespectful, but in reality it is a celebration of the liberties we’ve been given. We have the freedom to choose, and consent to, whatever fantasies we want. It is an amazing luxury, and repressing our own desires is just squandering it. Obviously it isn’t for everyone, but whomever enjoys it should play to they’re heart’s content!

  25. foshothoyo wrote:

    The rationalizations for personal sexual turn-ons and thrills are many, and can’t be argued. It would be the same for people who have to defend why they like NASCAR racing. Arguing on points of preference is pointless. It doesn’t take Audrey
    Lorde to articulate the argument for unbounded sexual freedom for POC’s. I don’t think that is the sticking point here.

    the point is that there is a fundamental problem with coming to a consensus on the definitions of “healthy” and “consensual” in the context of sexual interaction framed by oppression – be it sexual, racial, or both.

    For instance, consider the Pornstar’s Dilemma:

    How can I tell if I am doing this because i want to, or because I have become so accustomed to being exploited that I am actually perpetuating my own abuse?

    (@EGhead: the irony of the interracial porn post is not lost on me either)

    This it is not a moral question of racial cohesion (for the good of the race), cultural disrespect, or sexual liberation. (which are all irrefutably valid in this whole thread since they are all subjective accounts)

    The core of this dilemma is that it is impossible to tell whether any activity is healthy or consensual even by the people who are engaging in it.

    Activities such as cutting are consensual acts of self-abuse which cannot be called “amoral” or “disrespectful” or “disgraceful to your race”. These activities also have a culture around them cultivated by those who participate in it to some degree, with their own rubric of logical proofs to come to the conclusion that what they are doing is a valid expression of their inner state of being etc…

    Whatever you are doing is always going to be OK because you are the one doing it, so if you run red lights, it’s a calculated risk, but if somebody else runs a red light, they are completely irresponsible drivers. This is why I don’t understand why this whole thing of “well don’t go an fuck random people” keeps coming up. Well, obviously, don’t go out and do that. You don’t go and pick up gum of the street and chew it, do you? Intellectuals in the BDSM community (or any community for that matter) are always ready to defend what they do with the same verve and rhetoric as any academic. Simply because you have an unabashedly unapologetic attitude towards what you like to do doesn’t mean that your reasoning behind it makes any sense to somebody that doesn’t get the “big O” at the end when they do it. It’s the same thing with drugs – if it makes you feel good, who cares where it comes from or why it makes you feel that way? It may have been smuggled here in somebody’s ass, but at the end of the day, I want my kicks. Everybody does that in one way or another – (like eating hot-dogs or watching porn or what have you), but that doesn’t make an argument for anything beyond “I’m-a do what I want, so THERE.”

    My point is that the issue with race-play is not really morality, not really freedom, not really sexuality. The ultimate question is simply “Am I colluding in my own abuse?” – a question which can only be answered by the person who is asking it.

  26. Lila wrote:

    “Thus, by putting our fears into an enjoyable context, we are overcoming them. Sort of like the way traumatized children play out the scenario that scares them, until they can move on.”

    This happens because humans instinctively try to adapt to hurtful circumstances. You can adapt to be better at combating it–or you can adapt to enjoy it and cooperate with it. Eroticizing hatred is an example of the 2nd kind of adaptation. Adapting to a hurtful world in that way helps us to endure it. Unfortunately it also helps those hurtful circumstances to endure. Evolutionarily, it’s a good strategy in that it helps promulgate our genes. For our minds and hearts, it’s a terrible strategy, because you are embracing horror in order to survive. Of course, it *feels* healing. And indeed you are better able to live with horror and hatred. Never mind the psychological cost. Never mind that the parts of you that would strongly reject the horror have to be worn down bit by bit.

    I might add that you don’t need to experience any especially notable trauma for this to happen. Life is full of invisible traumas and subconscious assaults.

    And we’ve all, in some way, to some degree, used this strategy. We’ve all compromised ourselves in order to be better able to endure this existence.

    It’s sad.

  27. Seattle Slim wrote:

    Great post! I will be visiting Mo’s blog more often.

    I can’t find it within myself to say why someone engages in their particular fetish. Only that person knows why, how it truly makes them feel, etc. We don’t know. If these couples can get into RP, there’s mutual respect, love, appreciation and each party is healthy mentally, spiritually and emotionally (and they know this to be true after serious self-evaluation), then I say do the damned thing.

  28. CJ wrote:

    26. Lila.. you took the words out of my mouth. People can be as kinky as they wanna be, but I agree this is just another way to make the unacceptable acceptable.

  29. AJ Plaid wrote:

    @foshothoyo–You’re assuming that race play–and to a greater extent, BDSM–is always abusive. As Mollena stated:

    The one thing–the only thing–that separates BDSM from abuse is consent.

    Mollena–and others who participate in BDSM–freely give consent, especially in terms of being a submissive. Therefore, it’s not abuse.

    @Erika–No one is telling *you* to take part in a Japanese-internment camp. Not me. Not Mollena. No one. Mollena acknowledged that such a race-play scenerio exist, which means that there may be some Japanese-American people who participate in it–whether they may have grandparents who were actually interred or not. That may seem disrespectful to you, which is understandable. But Japanese-American folks, like everyone else, hold very diverse views and participate in various sex acts that some others that are a part of the considered group may find offensive. That’s why I say using The Group to justify our particular sexual discomforts is very problematic.

    @Chairo, Lila, and CJ–Honestly, feel whatever you want. As Mollena will feel what she feels about race play–and will continue to do it, regardless of your judgment of it. Or her.

  30. foshothoyo wrote:

    @AJ: I am not assuming that BDSM and race play are always abusive. As I stated in the Pornstar’s Dilemma (which I would love to see you address by the way) –

    “How can I tell if I am doing this (consenting to an act) because i want to, or because I have become so accustomed to being exploited that I am actually perpetuating my own abuse?”

    I am not assuming that all BDSM/race-play is abuse. I am pointing out the difficult question of what consent is, and what psychological phenomena the verbiage of “consensual actions” can occlude – in sex or any other relationship. In fact, you could apply the pornstar’s dilemma when you order a burger from McDonalds or apply for a credit card.

    Discussing consent in the context of abuse requires the uncomfortable process of discerning volition from compulsion. From the perspective of spectators, as well as the parties involved (abuser and victim), it can appear to be a volitional relationship, when in reality there can be a complex network of compulsions at work.

    The three forms of “apparent consent” are: true consent, compulsion, and capitulation.

    Now, even though BDSM/RP concerns the re-enactment of non-consensual themes and activities, I agree that it is entirely possible for it to be a truly consensual activity.

    However, it is also possible that it is a compulsive activity on the part of one or many parties to subject themselves to a re-enactment of their own dehumanization/trauma/abuse. Beyond compulsion, it could be a completely capitulated victimization, in which one or more parties cannot or has been conditioned to resign themselves to victimhood. To conflate these kinds of re-victimizations as true consent is disingenuous and dismissive of the very real pathologies and dynamics that exist and permeate the sex-industry as well as the BDSM subculture. To say that this phenomena does not exist whatsoever in the BDSM/RP world only serves to undermine the ideological credibility of its advocates and allies.

    Ask any practicing psychologist, or better yet, go to any rehab center and ask the workers there about the relationship between sex, compulsion, and abuse in the people who they care for. Sexual compulsion and capitulation can be self-driven perpetuation of past abuse masquerading as apparent consent.

    That is why I find this whole unilateral advocacy of RP thing so bizarre and hypocritical. How can you say that pornography and the sex-industry is exploitative of race and women and men and those who have suffered sexual abuse, and then contradict yourself by saying that BDSM and RP do not have any relationship with those same exploitations, compulsions, and pathologies in the same breath? The very THEME is dominance and submission based on sex, gender, and race!

    Let me reiterate. BDSM+RP is not always abusive, BUT it can be practiced by people who are engaging compulsive self-abuse.

    The bottom line is that you can’t have a complete conversation about BDSM/RP if you refuse to acknowledge that the definition of consent is more complex than just a surface affirmation of the desire to engage in an activity, especially in the context of sexual relations – in social, psychological, and legal contexts.

    As you and Mo yourselves stress:
    “The one thing–the only thing–that separates BDSM from abuse is consent.”

    I completely agree – and it is your very assertion that reinforces my case for the importance of scrutinizing the definition of consent in the context of sexual trauma and abuse histories, which has a critical bearing on the classification of a sexual act as abusive, compulsively self-abusive or truly consensual.

    I don’t know how I can make it any clearer for you than that.

  31. Lina wrote:

    What about a situation in which a person assumes the racial/cultural/ethnic identity other than their own in their race play? (For example, a white person adopts the identity of a person of color and then bottoms for another white person in their sex play.)

    There has already been expressed some concern as to whether or not a person of color is in any way perpetuating their own oppression, be it only in a personal realm or within the public domain, when they engage in race play. I know that I cannot judge whether a person’s arousal is “acceptable” or tell someone how to express themselves sexually. However, I think that it is reasonable to say that when a white person adopts my cultural identity for their own sexual pleasure that they are culturally appropriating, and that they are being racist/culturally insensitive to my community’s history of pain, suffering, and systematic oppression. We understand that there are certain types of insensitive or “ironic” humor that are unacceptable, or that it is not okay for a white person to wear blackface for their own “fun” regardless of whether they are doing so privately or publicly. These acts are racist. So why is it “acceptable” for a white person, or a person of color, to appropriate another person’s identity/suffering for their sex play? And in that case, why is it okay for a PoC to use the trauma experience of their own community for their own sexual pleasure when they did not personally experience that type of torture/oppression/etc. and are not working out personal sexual abuse issues? Aren’t they using someone else’s pain just as inappropriately as a white person who assumes my PoC identity for their sexual pleasure? (And, of course, why can’t a PoC engage in BDSM without necessarily purposefully invoking racism or being accused of invoking racism? Sometimes, BDSM is just BDSM, and not race play.) What should be the boundaries when it comes to assuming a sexual role, be that dominant/submissive and/or the identity of another race/culture? Obviously, consent has a lot to do with what is okay and what isn’t. But doesn’t cultural appropriation and racist or “ironic” humor/sexual expression extend to the bedroom? If we don’t wholly make our decisions about what we find sexy in a vacuum (the influence of culture, peers, community, family, religion, the media, social trends are ever present), then how can we say that we are consciously consenting to race play or any sexual experience that results in actions that are very similar to real racism or real abuse?

    I know that I have stated a strong opinion here, but I’m really just looking for answers. Where are the lines for you? In the case where you are exploring your own race in race play, how do you know that you are not enacting or re-enacting your own abuse or engaging in psychologically unhealthy emotional outlets? And in the case that someone else appropriates your racial/cultural identity and your immense (and continued) trauma for their sexual expression, why or why don’t you think that is okay?