On Burlesque [Essay]

by Guest Contributor Tiara the Merch Girl

Depending on who you ask, burlesque can either be a tool to poke fun at the Establishment by bringing them down to the “low-brow”, or a way to bask in vintage 1940s and 1950s glamour. It’s a growing art form with plenty of enthusiasts jumping in for a chance to shake, shimmy, and show off. However, with its overwhelmingly White presence, how does it deal with performers and fans from culturally diverse backgrounds?

I’m Tiara, a Malaysian of Bangladeshi heritage currently based in Brisbane, Australia. I started getting into burlesque in January and have recently debuted to the public as Tiara the Merch Girl (after being said Merch Girl at Brisbane’s Burlesque Ball). I also seem to be one of the very few Asian (or at the very least non-White) burlesque people in the area; the only other person I know of is Maiden Chyna, who is as new as me. I got into burlesque as I love performing and was intrigued at the possibility of expressing myself and my sexuality in ways that I was never able to when I was in Malaysia. I’ve seen fallen in love with the sheer creativity, talent, and humour that has come from burlesque performers around the world.

In my burlesque adventures I have noticed a distinct lack of resources, information, or even talent from culturally diverse backgrounds. As it is, there are hardly any growing organised scenes outside the UK, USA, and Australia, with small pockets in New Zealand, Canada, Scandinavia, and Western Europe. While they do exist, they tend to either be overlooked or exoticised. How does race and culture play out in burlesque, and its sibling subcultures such as rockabilly and pinup?

What Is Burlesque?

The word ‘burlesque’ is commonly thought to have derived from the Spanish word burla and the Italian burlesco, which literally means ‘to send up’. The original burlesques, first popularised in the 14th century by Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales but more prominent in the 18th and 19th centuries, were a form of musical or theatrical comedy that parodied classical opera and theatre pieces in bawdy and risque ways. It was also a means for satirising current political and social issues amongst the middle and working classes. Burlesque travelled to the US in the 19th/early 20th centuries, originally as part of vaudeville and variety shows, but eventually forming into a subgenre that heavily incorporated theatrics, striptease, and elaborate sets and costumes.

Currently there are two main genres of burlesque – the Traditional (Classical/British) burlesque, which is more comedic and satirical, and the American burlesque-striptease, which strongly involves glamour and sexuality. There are also subgroups and crossovers with other subcultures and art forms – gorelesque (which is more horror and Gothic-based), acrobatics and other circus skills, modelling, pole dance, and so on. While individual burlesque performances are as varied and diverse as the people that do them, there seems to be a few common elements in modern/neo-burlesque:

    * “Horrible prettiness” (from the book of the same name by Robert Clyde Allen), referring to the subversion of gender roles and beauty norms by having non-conventional-looking women dress up in a often-feminine and glamourous manner, but acting rowdy, bawdy, and sometimes uncouth – like “one of the boys”
    * Careful and clever use of music, props, and costuming to evoke a mood or theme
    * Telling a story or making a joke through performance
    * A light, fun, relaxed attitude that’s willing to send itself up
    * Flamboyancy and the willingness to go to grotesque extremes with looks and behaviour

In places like Australia, burlesque performers tend to cross genres and styles; many performers come from some other artistic background and incorporate that into their performances. While there are still divisions over style – Parodic vs Pretty – they’re generally subtle and many performers play around with both main genres. There are also many enthusiasts that get involved in burlesque as a means of expressing their sexuality and body awareness, particularly amongst those that don’t fit traditional beauty standards or that come from more restrictive backgrounds. There are also many male burlesquers, or “boylesquers”, many of whom also work with drag and subverting gender norms. The burlesque scene seems to be more open than most in terms of age and looks; many established performers and new entrants are in their 30s and 40s, with not as much pressure to “stay youthful” as in other arts.

Burlesque Around the World

Burlesque in its “native” style doesn’t really exist outside the US and UK; indeed, the scenes in other countries tend to adopt American and British aesthetics and creative norms. However, the idea of using performance art as means of expressing sexuality, having flamboyant fun, or mocking the upper classes is one that is strongly evident in many other traditional and cultural art forms. For instance, many burlesquers look to Bollywood and bellydance culture as a means of inspiration, with their striking costumes and strong use of music and dance to tell stories, while the Indonesian dangdut scene has often courted controversy for being “pornographic” mainly due to the relatively-revealing costumes and gyrating.

There seems to be a thriving burlesque scene in Japan, with troupes such as Murasaki Babydoll getting standing ovations in major conventions like San Francisco’s Tease-o-Rama and the launch of the Tokyo branch of Dr Sketchy’s, an “anti-art school” franchise created by American illustrator and fine artist Molly Crabapple that incorporates live drawing classes with burlesque/alternative performers as models.

Singapore also has a Dr Sketchy’s branch ( and just recently hosted Australian performer Kelly Ann Doll in residence, making her the first burlesque performer in the country. Singapore does have a strong comedy and variety scene, with comedians such as Hossan Leong and Kumar, and Japan’s multitudes of variety TV and game shows with bizarre and humorous skits make it a strong starting point for Asian burlesque.

China has also started its foray into the burlesque world, with the opening of burlesque and cabaret club Chinatown in Shanghai. It was formed by New York producer couple Amelia Kallman and Norman Gosney, who wanted to bring a touch of ’30s Hollywood glamour to China. Despite its location and rich cultural heritage (the venue used to be a Buddhist temple), the acts are still very American; the girls in the resident multicultural troupe Chinatown Dolls have names like Miss Sassafrass Sassypants and Miss Ruby Tuesday, and English performances make up most of the acts. The inclusion of Chinese culture seems to be limited to a couple of Chinese acts and songs (including a Chinese calendar girl act), a poster of Chairman Mao on the wall, and local MCs making fun of the expats – their core audience. Are they concerned by China’s censorship to not incorporate more of Chinese culture beyond the superficial, or have they just not considered it thoroughly?

In some countries, such as my native Malaysia, it can be very difficult to satirise socio-political issues without getting in trouble with the law. While ’50s American performers such as Gypsy Rose Lee were frequently arrested over indecency charges, Malaysian productions and media have come under fire and controversy for being subversive or for “threatening national security”. (An example of this is the 2001 public production of The Vagina Monologues in Kuala Lumpur, where the performers were nearly locked up for discussing vaginas and women’s sexuality openly.) Therefore, it can be quite difficult to pull off burlesque in those areas: either you’re charged for public stripping or you’re charged for mocking the government – or, as the New Year’s Eve Paul’s Place incident shows, you could be charged for “black metal”.

There’s also the association made between burlesque, stripping, and sex work – they are not necessarily related but often get conflated with each other. While not all burlesque involves stripping – and indeed it never started out that way – modern mainstream burlesque, especially that of Dita von Teese, have made the assumption that performers need to be bare to be authentic. The question of whether or not to strip is still a matter of debate amongst burlesque performers and enthusiasts, many of whom are tired of the dismissal of burlesque (both by outsiders and within) as just “fancy stripping for the middle class” and ignore the rich artistic legacy and creativity available. The idea of women being loud, brash, open, and dominating in the public eye, especially around men – the “horrible prettieness” alluded to by Allen – also runs counter to a lot of traditional cultural norms, which stress on politeness, being demure, and modesty. It’s not surprising, then, that people who were raised in particular cultures may not be immediately drawn to burlesque; they may consider it too much like sex work instead of a flexible and diverse art form that can include as much sexuality as they wish.

Personally I would love to bring burlesque to Malaysia; there’s definitely talent for it, with seasoned comedians, theater performers, and dancers, and the creative people in Malaysia are also people passionate about social issues – such as singer/writer Shanon Shah, who is also active with Sisters in Islam and LGBT rights in Malaysia. Malaysia also has very rick traditions of culture, arts, and social commentary, and it would be very interesting to see how the Malaysian public interprets burlesque for self-expression. The trick now is to pull it off without landing everyone in jail or being accused of hosting “promiscuous sex parties” with Satanists! It takes careful navigation of laws on decency, subversion, and public speech; just the act of organising and hosting a burlesque show in Malaysia could be a lot more political than the content of many contemporary acts.

Burlesque and Cultural Expression

Despite the existence of burlesque groups outside the US and UK, there doesn’t seem to be a lot of variance in terms of cultural diversity and expression. As demonstrated by Shanghai’s Chinatown club, the burlesque presence overseas is still deeply steeped in 1930s-1950s British/American aesthetics – glamour, corsets, spangles, feathers, Moulin Rouge can-can dresses. The challenge seems to be balancing your assertion of your cultural identity (however much you want to) without turning into something exotic or a token.

There are quite a number of culturally diverse burlesque performers in the US, many of whom are inspired by the iconic Josephine Baker, the first African-American to star in a major motion picture and integrate a concert hall, as well as a strong player in the Civil Rights movement and the French Resistance during World War II. Contemporary performers such as Brown Girls Burlesque and Vixen Noir also do a lot of work in encouraging women of colour (and queer women of colour, in Vixen Noir’s case) to explore burlesque and express their sexuality through performance.

What I find interesting, but also a little bit troubling, is that quite a number of performers from culturally diverse backgrounds use their colour or race as their main means of identification. There are quite a few black performers with “Coco” or “Cocoa” in the name, or make some reference to being dark: Honey Cocoa Bordeauxx, Coco Framboise, CoCo La Creme, Miss Coco Lectric, Foxy Tann. The Shanghai Pearl and Tomahawk Tassels use their cultural heritage as a selling point. Some characters, like Alotta Boutte, are obviously tongue-in-cheek references, but does it become problematic when their image is built up on exotic stereotypes, such as Mimi RedLips’s Geisha and Harajuku acts? How about when it’s part of a homage to your heritage, such as Coco Lectric’s Indian Doll?

How about when other performers incorporate elements of cultures that are not their own? Every cultural stereotype has been part of a burlesque act one way or another – from walking like an Egyptian to being a Twisted Gypsy . My burlesque teacher, long-time Australian veteran dancer Lena Marlene, has a Buddhist burlesque act based around fire (her signature prop) and saffron yellow robes. She took up Comparative Religion in university and personally enjoys subverting religions of all kinds. Some others, like Scarlet O’Gasm, have used religious iconography to make political statements – she performed at an event commemorating Obama’s election as President with a routine involving a burqa.

Since burlesque is largely about making the sacred profane, and has never really been known for being politically correct, are all cultures fair game to any performer that wants them? Where do you draw the line between respectful inspiration and appropriation – especially when the cultures often appropriated are heavily underrepresented in burlesque? Is using common stereotypes and cultural iconography mocking the use of such stereotypes in popular culture, or does it just add to the stereotyping? Do culturally diverse performers have an obligation to involve their cultural background into their burlesque character and performances, or can they get away with being neutral?

Burlesque and I

Questions of appropriation are especially difficult for me given my multicultural background. Despite coming from Bangladeshi heritage, I know hardly anything about the culture or lifestyle; I have only been back in Bangladesh for short holidays and am generally considered a foreigner even amongst my relatives. I was born and raised in Malaysia, which itself has a melting pot culture that often borrows from Malay, Chinese, Indian, European, and various other cultures; however, as a ultra-minority I never felt liked I “belonged” anywhere, and indeed I’m very iconoclastic even amongst my peers. Things became more complicated when I moved to Australia in 2006 – what do I say when people ask where I’m from? What culture am I supposed to align myself with?

I have quite a few ideas for routines and acts, many of which involve cultural elements I was exposed to in my lifetime – traditional dances, props like the kuda kepang, songs, even advertising and other tropes of pop culture. However, a lot of these elements aren’t really “native” to me in a sense – they’re Malaysian, sometimes very specific to Chinese or Malay culture. Yet I don’t feel comfortable incorporating anything Bengali or Bangladeshi – I don’t know enough to make the best use of Bengali culture. Burlesque is a way for me to express my thoughts and experiences creatively, and a lot of that involves my upbringing and heritage. What can I incorporate fairly, and what is off limits?

The routine for my public burlesque debut, at Brisbane’s Cabaret Burlesque competition in June, is directly based upon my Muslim upbringing. It was originally a cheeky idea – what if you did a reverse strip (putting clothes on instead of off) and transformed into a Muslim woman? It’s not something anyone’s done before, and the twist would be funny at the very least. Building up the routine, especially the choice of song, transformed it into a meditation on how Muslim women are also sensual and sexual beings in touch with their bodies, despite the assumptions made by their veils and headcoverings. The choice of song, Deeyah’s “Pashto Lullaby (Lori)“, was significant in many ways – besides setting the tone for the act, it also echoed Deeyah’s personal clashes with Islamic fundamentalists over her video for “What Will It Be?“, a feminist Muslim anthem that depicts a woman in a burqa stripping off to a bikini before jumping into a pool.

Tiara the Merch Girl – Cabaret Burlesque – Islamic Routine – PLEASE READ THE DESCRIPTION from Tiara The Merch Girl on Vimeo.

I was rather nervous performing this act for many reasons: it was very personal and heartfelt, but because it was also a lot slower and more sombre than typical burlesque acts I was worried I would lose the audience out of boredom. I am usually a very restless person, but the act required careful focus and stillness – something I had to work on a lot. I was also worried that Islamic extremists would come across my act and condemn my family and I to hell – if it happened to Deeyah it could happen to me!

To my surprise and delight, the audience absolutely loved my act. It achieved what I wanted: it made them think about their own assumptions regarding Muslim women and those who wear the veil. Many people connected with the act and felt it was beautiful, heartfelt, moving, inspirational. I moved my teacher to teachers and received many hugs and kudos from the audience and beyond. And I didn’t even get a death threat! The response was overwhelmingly positive and humbling; I’m glad I took the opportunity to tell my truth through an art form that I loved.

Do other burlesque performers from culturally diverse backgrounds get to express their truth too, whether about their cultural identity or otherwise? How much of a “cultural ambassador” do such performers need to be to be taken seriously? Are culturally diverse performers participating in cultural appropriation when they dress up in traditional burlesque attire – a throwback to Victorian and French cabaret – or play around with cultural artifacts? If burlesque is so accepting of people from various backgrounds, looks, ages, and so on, why are there still so few performers of colour? How can the burlesque world be more open and accepting of performers from other cultural backgrounds, and incorporate them – not just their stereotypes – into their creative world?

The Merch Girl (my site)
Ministry of Burlesque
Kittie (founder of Ministry of Burlesque, has excellent essays about burlesque history & culture)
Burlesque Magazine (Australia)
Unleash Your Fire (Vixen Noir’s Erotic Performance academy with a strong focus on queer women of colour)
Burlesque Daily (by Jo Weldon, headmistress of New York School of Burlesque)
Brown Girls Burlesque:
Horrible Prettiness

(Tiara photo by Darcy Papparazzi; all other photos of Josephine Baker, Murasaki Babydoll, Brown Girls Burlesque, Tomahawk Tassels, The Shanghai Pearl, Mimi Redlips, and Honey Cocoa Bordeauxx from the performer’s websites)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Race politics and burlesque - any resources? - Ministry Of Burlesque on 08 Jul 2009 at 11:13 am

    [...] as evidenced by the lack of replies, no one else has a clue either :P My essay is up: On Burlesque [Essay] at Racialicious – the intersection of race and pop culture __________________ Tiara the Merch Girl – Entertaining your fans, making your stage life [...]

  2. links for 2009-07-08 « Embololalia on 08 Jul 2009 at 2:08 pm

    [...] On Burlesque [Essay] at Racialicious – the intersection of race and pop culture In my burlesque adventures I have noticed a distinct lack of resources, information, or even talent from culturally diverse backgrounds. As it is, there are hardly any growing organised scenes outside the UK, USA, and Australia, with small pockets in New Zealand, Canada, Scandinavia, and Western Europe. While they do exist, they tend to either be overlooked or exoticised. How does race and culture play out in burlesque, and its sibling subcultures such as rockabilly and pinup? (tags: japan uk usa singapore southeastasia australia malaysia politics objectification dance theatre race) [...]

  3. “On Burlesque” and Booty « Afrodescendiente on 08 Jul 2009 at 7:29 pm

    [...] http://www.racialicious.com/2009/07/08/on-burlesque-essay/ What is the difference between the booty of Straight Stuntin and the Burlesque of Josephine Baker? If the expression of sexuality, esp black female bodies, is ok in burlesque why not in the photos of an online black booty magazine? It is ok in either place? Is a black booty magazine more akin to the exploitation of Saratije Baartman or the admiration of a feather clad Josephine Baker ? [...]

  4. Links of Great Interest 7/17/09 | the Hathor Legacy on 17 Jul 2009 at 4:12 pm

    [...] discusses ephemera and the histories of queer POC. There’s another up by Tiara the Merch Girl on burlesque. Monica is actually the blogger behind TransGriot, which is totally awesome, and has a great post [...]

Comments

  1. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist! wrote:

    a very cool, insightful article. I also enjoyed the performance in the video!

    Yet I don’t feel comfortable incorporating anything Bengali or Bangladeshi – I don’t know enough to make the best use of Bengali culture. Burlesque is a way for me to express my thoughts and experiences creatively, and a lot of that involves my upbringing and heritage. What can I incorporate fairly, and what is off limits?

    I wish I could give you a straight answer, but I don’t have anything good. Well, I guess you should just create an act you’re really comfortable with, that you feel it would honor your heritage and maybe implement some parts of Bengali culture, like music, jewelry, or clothes.

  2. Pickly wrote:

    What culture am I supposed to align myself with?

    Do you actually have to put yourself into a particular culture? (From the post, it seems that the main reason to do this would be to provide an answer to other people, when from the description it seems like the most natural thing to do would be to follow you own mix of stuff.)

    (these are just personal observations from the post, obviously I can’t say anything strongly from just an internet post.)

  3. Emerald Ace wrote:

    Hi hun, great article with some really interesting themes discussed.
    I think the question of appropriation is one that has always interested me, not just in regards to burlesque – if you are fascinated by an aspect of another culture is it ok to pay homage to that or even be cheeky and parody it? And do the rules change if you are in the minority group borrowing from the majority? All cultures borrow from eachother a bit how much borrowing is too much?
    Also, the question of plumbing your own roots in interesting too – I am half Polish and part of me would really love to celebrate this side of my heritage with a burlesque act but another part of me feels I am not well enough accquainted with the nuances of Polish culture to do that legitimately.
    All in all this article got me thinking and I’m sure it will for everyone else too!

  4. Autumn wrote:

    Thank you so much for writing this article. I’m an African-American with a recent interest in burlesque and have been toying with the idea of actually performing. This post discusses a lot of things that have been plaguing my mind lately, and it’s very encouraging to see someone else thinking about them, too.

    This part particularly hit home: The challenge seems to be balancing your assertion of your cultural identity (however much you want to) without turning into something exotic or a token.

    It’s truly what I’d like to be. I’d love to be Autumn, the Burlesque Performer, not Autumn, Token Black Burlesque Performer or Autumn, Spokesperson for Women of Color. Yet at the same time, I do think my acts should introduce women of color to an alternative form of sexuality other than what is shown on BET.

    I was also troubled by the vintage aspect. I like the glamorous, old Hollywood style, but always felt like adopting that style for me (and, thus, classifying it as “superior”) meant that I had to accept all other aspects of that time. That Glamor-style was a white person’s style, and in order to adopt it, I also had to adopt a white person’s way of thinking. Obviously, there’s difficulty in that. Also, vintage hairstyles just won’t work for me–I’ve made a vow to never relax my hair again.

    Anyway, I’m rambling. Thank you once again for this post; it’s made me feel more comfortable knowing that my musings aren’t those of a girl going in circles, but are actually valid questions.

  5. gail wrote:

    @ Autumn:
    I’ve performed burlesque, most of my acts mock the aspects of my identity I find constraining. Burlesque or neo-burlesque is a glorious art form, not a theory, and the task is for the artist to approach it with creativity, humor, humility and courage. It’s possible to get a lot of things “wrong” or “right.” Sometimes the audience gets it, sometimes they don’t. Sometimes the irreverence is brilliant, sometimes it’s offensive. Art lets us approach life as lovely, laughing human beings. Let yourself experiment with everything. Do it!

  6. alumiere wrote:

    i thought your performance was stunning – beautiful and thoughtful and provoking all at once

    i admit that i haven’t seen all of the burlesque shows in the US, but i’ve seen quite a few, and by and large they seem to focus on white women (and occasionally cross-dressed me) taking (most of) their clothes off, often with silly patter, routines, etc

    the few shows i’ve seen that feature different talents and ethnicities, but not stripping have been when burlesque is part of a larger “freak show” – where sword swallowing, silks, fire performance, snake charming, etc are part of the whole – but the performers are still 90% white, which is sad imho

    in the late 1800s/early 1900s burlesque included much more cultural diversity in some ways, but the non-white performers were often exploited as exotic others; i’d love to see modern burlesque be more diverse with out the exploitation factor, it would be a big selling point in my book (and once again, if the group is doing satirical burlesque this would be a good opportunity to correct some of the past wrongs and address some of the issues our current society fails to comprehend; maybe when viewed as art the message will get through)

  7. Amber wrote:

    Great article, Tiara! As a black novice performer, these are musings I’ve often had myself.

  8. GueraLola wrote:

    really good! I never thought of burlesque that way. For me I see it as the vintage old Hollywood style, with a twist. But I never thought or it as “Horrible prettiness’ or satire even. thank so much! But one thing I personally stay way from is the balancing your assertion of your cultural identity , ” there seems to be a VERY fine fine from appropriation to building your act from exotic stereotypes. I don’t want hear about the insert here sexual stereotype but there are so many positive aspects were burlesque celebrate women who are plus size ect.

  9. n wrote:

    This is a very interesting post, especially when read immediately after the one on big, black booties. It is interesting to see different takes on what is an appropriate show of female sexuality, especially for women of color.
    What is appreciation, what is objectification? What is the difference between what a burlesque performer does and a model in Straight Stuntin does? What is the difference in the perceptions of each by their audiences?

  10. Tiara the Merch Girl wrote:

    Thanks everyone! I really appreciate all the comments.

    1. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist! – That’s what I tend to do anyway, though my knowledge of Bengali culture is superficial at best. Ironically a lot of the subcontinent’s pop culture tends to appropriate tons of stuff from elsewhere (just watch any Bollywood movie) – are the politics different when it’s a culturally diverse group doing the appropriation?

    2. Pickly – Personally I’d rather not align myself to any culture at all! However, I also feel like my culture(s) don’t get enough representation or respect in contemporary pop culture anyway, let alone in burlesque. Any portrayals tend to be heavy on the stereotype. I’d love to express my culture more, the issue here is whether I’d just fall into stereotyping too.

    3. Emerald Ace – hallo! What you feel about Polish culture is how I feel about my link to Bengali culture too, not being acquainted enough and all. The nuances make the difference!

    4. Autumn – hi, I love you, you must be my twin in mindset! I especially love what you said about vintage clothing. I recently wrote a rant about how the vintage look gets so over-pushed and how I wanted to see something different…and then got stuck in an argument about corsets and how “if you don’t like it don’t get involved”. For some people it’s just clothes, for others there’s a lot of nuance and history that needs to be looked at.

    5. gail – I like your approach :) Is there a danger to audiences who don’t get it though? Like those who take our spoof of the culture to be representative of that culture?

    6. alumiere – yeah, that tends to be the style that’s celebrated in American burlesque. Pretty, glamour, strong looks. I personally prefer the ‘freakshow’ burlesque too – that tends to be more a British thing, though there are some in Australia that are passionate about that style. I think part of it is the side effect of mainstreaming and commercialisation, like how when punk became popular it stopped being about politics and became more about Avril Lavinge’s t-shirts.

    7. Amber – thanks! It’s something I feel doesn’t get discussed enough.

  11. Tiara the Merch Girl wrote:

    GueraLola: Burlesque was originally satire (and didn’t even involve a good deal of pretty lady dancing) – it mocked the operas and politics of the era. It appealed to middle-class folk because they understood the references. It only became more about Hollywood glamour when it went to the US and became more a form of escapist entertainment for the working class.

  12. Thea Lim wrote:

    If you haven’t already heard of them, you should check out Colour Me Dragg, a Toronto burlesque/boylesque/drag show with performers of colour only that also happens to be pretty fantastic. Their website is here: http://colourmedragg.blogspot.com/ though it looks like it hasn’t been updated lately.

    I don’t quite agree with the way you problematise performers who “use their colour or race as their main means of identification.” You mention CoCo La Creme as an example – and having seen her perform multiple times I can say it is almost a religious experience (that is also sexy?!), but that she’s definitely incredibly aware of the politics of race that surround her act – and I think the way she names herself is an embrace of that.

    As well (it is different now) but I remember when I first saw her that she was one of the first or only black burlesque performers that was really big in Toronto. There was no mistaking the fact that she was black in a white scene – I appreciated the way that she made no bones about that. AND she also has been instrumental in changing the make-up of the scene – she runs burlesque workshops for people of colour only.

    This is a bit roundabout, but all this is to say that I always support self-identification, and includes the way that performers self-identify and work that identity into their art. I only start to have a problem with that when their act becomes racist, ie when they way they self-identify perpetuates racist representations FOR a white/non-anti-racist audience. I wouldn’t have a problem with a Japanese or East Asian performer doing a geisha bit – but only if it was for an anti-racist audience.

    I definitely think that acting out exoticised stereotypes in an anti-racist setting can be immensely moving and liberating for both audience and performer. Hence the magic of CoCo LaCreme :) .

  13. bdsista wrote:

    Burlesque is a subject of huge contention in the bellydance community. The most notable is Princess Fahana the bellydancer who is also Pleasant Gehlman the burlesque artist. I have a few dancer friends who do burlesque and a few who dance in the shows, usually in Tribal fusion style. I myself don’t have an issue with it, provided it is kept separately from Bellydance.
    Why?
    Because Bellydance traditionally comes form the folkloric dances of Egypt, Turkey, Morocco, Algeria, Lebanon, etc. They were stylized into what we generally know as Egyptian, Turkish or Lebanese Nightclub/Cabaret style influenced interestingly enough by the glitz and glam of Hollywood and the west. But in the US, dancers have fought for years to overcome the stigma from Little Egypt and Sol Bloom who wrote the “hootchie coochie” song. I still hear people say to me “Oh you do that hootchie coochie dance?” Never mind the years of travel, hours and money spent studying from master teachers and at this point thousands of dollars I have spent on costumes, props, etc. Bellydancers are fighting to be recognized as legitimate dance just like Ballet, Modern, Jazz, Irish dance, etc. In my opinion, it takes us backwards, when you mix in burlesque, hence the conflict in the community.
    Bellydance is family friendly, you can have your kid in a stroller all the way to grandma participating. Burlesque while artistic is not for everyone. But I really enjoyed the article.

  14. Jo-Anne wrote:

    Hi there,

    Good topic to investigate, it was definitely worth bringing up for discussion.

    Generally, I’ve found that the burlesque community is quite embracing of people from different cultures, races and sexualities. After all, Erochica Bamboo (http://www.myspace.com/erochica), a Japanese performer won the title of Miss Exotic World in 2007, which as most in the burlesque community are aware, is sort of like winning the burlesque version of Miss Universe. I believe her performances range from typical showgirl to those which involve her Japanese heritage. There are also other Asians in the community who have been quite successful, such as Shien Lee, who runs Dances of Vice in New York (http://www.dancesofvice.com) – and her shows are usually rococco or Victorian themed events (so, according to your article, she’s “gotten away with being neutral”).

    I certainly don’t wish to trivialise your arguments, as they’re valid discussion points to bring to the surface, but I’m generally of the opinion that the fewer numbers of burlesque performers from different races is not so much due to the fact that they don’t fit the “stereotypical mould”, but simply because there are less of them out there. You also have to consider the fact that burlesque in itself is a niche community and has only recently undergone a revival, even in western parts of the world, including Australia.

    Having said that, I’m all for the exposure of international talent. Each month in Burlesque Magazine (http://www.burlesquemag.com), the burlesque scene is highlighted in various cities around the world. So far, this has included the Netherlands, Shanghai and Canada.

    At the end of the day, I feel that performers should be comfortable with what they do on stage. So for example, if Mimi Redlips, is happy to perform her “exotic” geisha or harajuku acts, then so be it. After all, your own performance drew upon your Islamic upbringing, which as you said, was warmly embraced by the audience. I agree with Gail – I embrace experimentation. After all, as most artists are aware, their performances are quite personal and can be interpreted differently by many people. And they certainly can’t please everybody, so as Gail said, “sometimes the audience gets it, sometimes they don’t”.

    Perhaps something else of note is Rose Chan, a Malay performer from the 50s who was quite famous and even covered in the international press.

    http://softfilm.blogspot.com/2009/05/wild-wild-rose-chan.html

    Jo, editor (http://www.burlesquemag.com)

    PS. And not that I think it’s of any significance, but my own background is Malaysian Chinese and I was born in Australia.

  15. Adrianna wrote:

    Great Articles Thank you for posting your performance. . Now I want to do that. I get to have fun, engage in satire , be sexy .

  16. Tiara the Merch Girl wrote:

    Thea: Thanks for the info on Colour Me Dragg and Coco La Creme! I agree that if they’re able to subvert their racial identity, it’s awesome – but there’s no real way of telling whether an audience is going to be anti-racist or not. Sometimes you can work your hardest to be subversive and quirky, and you still get the loons who go “ah, so that is how $RACE are like” as though you’re the spokesperson! aiyish. Also it’s one thing when you have a pioneer like CoCoLaCreme – what I’m worried about are newer acts who pin themselves on their race because they haven’t really thought much about their artistic potential. It becomes lazy – “hmm, what shall my name be? Oh yeah, I’m brown. COCO!”. There’s so much potential to come out of your personality; don’t just take the obvious!

    bdsista: Ah yeah, I’ve read about the debates in the bellydance community. I don’t think it’s fair to say that bellydance being incorporated into burlesque takes it backwards though. Certainly, when it’s being used superficially – nothing more than “hootchie cootchie” – it’s unhelpful and annoying. But there are many performers who do take a lot of time training and researching, spending lots of effort on choreography and props and so on – and they are every bit as legitimate as pure bellydance. Just because burlesque is skewed towards a more adult audience doesn’t mean that’s a bad thing, or that it’s automatically degrading to whatever else it incorporates – we need to see context.

    Jo-Anne: hallo, I was wondering when you’ll come by :) I wrote an article on Rose Chan – funny how there hasn’t really been anyone else from the region for ages (well, except me, probably). Thanks for the info on Erochica Bamboo, I didn’t know that about her! I don’t understand your argument tho – “there are less performers from different races because there are less performers from different races”? Do you mean just in general or in burlesque specifically? Either way it’s still troubling – it’s not like Whites are the worldwide majority so why are they so particularly dominant in arts and culture? Especially when there’s a WEALTH of culture and art worldwide?

  17. Lauren LaRouge wrote:

    Hi,

    I think you’ve said a lot of interesting things in the article however I just want to say that I think it is very dangerous to make negative comments about performers who you have never actually seen perform or spoken to about their work like Mimi Redlips. I actually know Mimi very well and find her performances extremely inspiring and motivational. Also a lot of her Harijuku acts etc are very ‘tongue in cheek’ as she is often making fun of the establishment such as the Australian Immigration department which she has had much life experience with – instead of conforming to some steryotype. Also I think that its dangerous to put anyone down as a performer full stop because as a community we should be supporting each other instead of attacking other performers as didn’t we all get into Burlesque because we wanted to express ourselves in some way or another? I don’t think there can really be a “right” or “wrong” in self expression – this isn’t a maths exam after all (thank god! as im awful with numbers). I know that you are new to the Burlesque community as I met you working as the merch girl at the Brisbane Burlesque Ball, so I would suggest that you try and support other performers as people have obviously supported you instead of making negative comments about their image / shows etc – especially when you haven’t seen them in action. Thanks my 2 cents anyway, but good luck to you – im glad you’re thinking so deeply about all these issues.
    xoxoLauren LaRouge

  18. Jha wrote:

    Jo Anne @ 14: I find this statement – “I’m generally of the opinion that the fewer numbers of burlesque performers from different races is … simply because there are less of them out there” – very typical when discussing “why aren’t there more diverse performers?”

    It’s a bit like saying “there aren’t more big-name actresses because actresses just don’t do big-name movies”. There are reasons that “there are less of them out there” – could be their upbringing doesn’t encourage it (which makes no sense, because it’s not like white performers uniformly come from adventurous upbringings), could be that they just don’t know about burlesque and the possibilities in burlesque, or could be they’re turned off by the main images burlesque conjures up, or could be that they just don’t feel welcome and it’s not something they feel they can own.

    It’s too simplistic to assume there aren’t more non-white performers out there just because, well, there aren’t. I find it troubling how easily we tend to swallow this whole.

    Lauren LaRouge @ 17: Being able to take criticism gracefully is necessary to improving one’s own talent. Sure, your performance or work of art can be as personal as all get-out, but if it offends someone (or worse still, contributes to the hurting of whole groups of people), you’ve got to ask yourself how responsible you are to your audience.

  19. Tiara the Merch Girl wrote:

    Lauren: Hey! I don’t see how anything I wrote can be considered “negative” – it’s more ‘questioning’, really. I don’t think it does any of us any favours if we just be all happy-clappy about it and deny ourselves the opportunity to really look at what we’re performing, what we’re putting out there, and how that relates to the rest of the world. Burlesque is especially political given its roots and it would behoove us to think more about what we’re doing.

    That said, thanks for the background on Mimi’s acts – it definitely gives more context onto what she does and why.

  20. Mimi wrote:

    Hi. It’s Mimi. You mentioned me in your essay.

    “does it become problematic when their image is built up on exotic stereotypes, such as Mimi RedLips’s Geisha and Harajuku acts?”

    I will answer the question but let’s have a look at this one first.

    “Is criticism not allowed in burlesque or something?”

    Of course it is allowed. Am I right to think that my friend’s comment caused you to ask this question and write about it here and there? It might have even upset you a little bit. Let me explain why she wrote what she wrote. Lauren is a sweet heart. She is very protective of me and other performers. She probably couldn’t stand that your question was based on your assumption about me and you misunderstood me especially when you haven’t even seen me perform. Feel free to criticise but you might want to do a bit more research otherwise I think it is possible to offend people. It is not very nice if someone was writing something that is not true about you, is it? (but I am flattered that you took a notice of me -which not many people tend to do and mentioned me in your essay)

    Your article was good. It raised very interesting points. I do think about those things as I am a minority in the scene though I don’t know what is right and wrong. But what I feel like is I am rarely what people are looking for when it comes to burlesque. How I look and what I do is not exactly what people would have in their mind when you think about burlesque, is it? I am just doing what I want to do but I must say I feel lost sometimes.

    “does it become problematic when their image is built up on exotic stereotypes, such as Mimi RedLips’s Geisha and Harajuku acts?”

    I don’t know the answer to this question. If that is what some people want to do, let them be. Why not? It seems like it troubles you though. But is my image really built up on exotic stereotypes as you assumed and stated?(This is why Lauren wrote what she wrote) I may have to differ on this one. Why do people assume that I am trying to be a geisha just because I am wearing a kimono? Do I ever call myself geisha? I don’t think I do.. Non Japanese people see me in kimono and call me geisha but I don’t call myself that because I am not geisha.. and I know what the term represents inside and outside Japan (actually it might be a bit blur.. ). I would love to call myself Anarchy Geisha but that one is used by Erochica Bamboo and I think that is really cool.

    There are quite a few photos of me in kimono but that is because I like dressing up in kimono. Should I stop wearing kimono just because some people don’t know any better than to assume kimono = geisha = whatever ideas they have about geisha or Japanese women? Don’t you think that would be a pity? Wearing kimono is not about being a geisha for me but seems like that’s how it is for many people. In Japan people who are not geisha wear kimono too… On my Myspace page it says I am available as a geisha. Yes if there is a well paid corporate gig that requires me to dress up as a geisha or in kimono then I shall do it. But I don’t think I am trying to be the exotic stereotype when I am on the stage doing my acts. I don’t want to be…

    I don’t actually have a “Geisha” act. I have an act called Mademoiselle Butterfly. I wear a kimono in the act. It is about an Oiran (courtesan: they wear the obi, sash in the front) wanting to one day fly away like a butterfly. It is a story about a girl longing for freedom. I don’t think this one has anything to do with Japanese stereotypes but then the opinion might differ depending on the person who sees it.

    I don’t have a “Harajuku Girl” act either… I believe harajuku girl is a term that started amongst English media. In Japan we had words to describe different kind of “Harajuku” people. Anyway I have an act called “Immigration”. It is about a girl doing an immigration officer a favour to get in the country. I am dressed sort of in a Lolita way in this act. I didn’t do this act to promote the stereotype but rather to make a mockery of the immigration process. Just a silly act…

    If people think what I do is based on exotic stereotype then that may not be deliberate. I am just doing what I want to do. How I look might give people a wrong idea but what I do shouldn’t as I try my acts to be quite motivational. I so don’t want to promote wrong ideas about Japanese women. Hell no. It might be beneficial for me to be more “neutral” and be more typical 40s 50s pin up girl to fit in the scene. I might get more gigs that way, could avoid this kind of argument and you probably wouldn’t have assumed what you assumed about me. But the full on 40s 50s thing is not really me even though I certainly like and incorporate some of the elements. Anyway even if I tried to dress that way I end up looking in a way that when people look at it they think it’s “Harajuku”…

    I hope this answers your questions….

  21. Tiara wrote:

    Hi Mimi! Thanks for coming by and giving your thoughts. Lauren’s comment didn’t really trigger my outburst as such, there was a lot more that led up to it, but it did end up being a last straw!

    “But what I feel like is I am rarely what people are looking for when it comes to burlesque. How I look and what I do is not exactly what people would have in their mind when you think about burlesque, is it? I am just doing what I want to do but I must say I feel lost sometimes.”

    I understand that. Heck that’s why I wrote this essay in the first place – because I got somewhat frustrated at not knowing where to position myself. Hence the stack of questions.

    It is really difficult to balance personal motivation with public perception. How much can you say ‘fuck it’ and how much effect do you have overall? questions questions!

  22. Coco Framboise wrote:

    What’s in a name?

    I’m curious; if the names of some performers of culturally diverse backgrounds trouble you and strike you as lazy, why didn’t you choose to interview them about how they arrived at those choices and how they may view ethnicity in their own work. Seems like quite and oversight in research.

    I dyed my name to Coco Framboise because it’s my favourite flavour combination for desserts. It’s also the name of my favourite martini at my favourite restaurant, and I order it often enough that they automatically set one down on my table whenever I arrive to dine. The rhythm of the phonics appealed to me and I loved how the two names worked together in a variety of interpretations. The French suited me as a nod to my Canadian identity as well as my family ties — I have a number of French and French-Canadian family members. I liked the juxtaposition of the smooth warmth of Coco with the puckery tartness of Framboise. And it was true both on the palette and in my personality; I am sweet, but acerbic when called for. Also, food seemed to be a recurring motif in my acts. A raspberry is also the name for an irreverent flatulent noise made with tongue and the lips. A sense of mockery and cheek perfect for the spirit of burlesque. Regardless of my appearance, Coco Framboise was destined to be my burlesque name. I apologize if these nuances were too subtle.

    That said, the fact that I am dark-skinned seemed advantageous. If the Coco portion of my name could help call my face to mind in sea of predominantly Caucasian performers, then that seemed like an effective choice. And not much different from Caucasian performers mentioning a stand-out physical attribute of themselves like the redheaded Ginger Darling or the buxom Tits McGee.

    Is the happenstance of my ethnicity my main means of identification? I don’t think so. Those who are familiar with my shows probably have other ways to catalogue the key attributes. And as names go, I would say mine is pretty neutral. My shows are also pretty neutral where my ethnicity is concerned. They’re not ABOUT my blackness. I actually have very little comment to make on that matter in my shows because my ethnic background is mostly a non-issue for me. It’s not my focus.

    You wrote, “In my burlesque adventures I have noticed a distinct lack of resources, information, or even talent from culturally diverse backgrounds. As it is, there are hardly any growing organised scenes outside the UK, USA, and Australia, with small pockets in New Zealand, Canada, Scandinavia, and Western Europe. While they do exist, they tend to either be overlooked or exoticised.”

    For such a supposedly small pocket, Canada boasts large burlesque festivals in three cities: Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal. The burlesque scene in Toronto is over 10 years old. As one of the producers of the Toronto Burlesque Festival I can tell you that the whole team is looking forward to hosting a long list of award-winning stars including Canada’s own Roxi Dlite (1st Runner-up, Reigning Queen of Burlesque 2009) this July 23rd-26th. We’ve expanded our festival from three days to four, and we’ve nearly doubled the curriculum of our workshop weekend across three campuses called, Toronto Burlesque University. Would that still be considered small?

    As you know, Canada is the second largest country in the world by land mass but the population is small in proportion. A lot of our population is clustered around a few major cities, and those cities are very far apart. This year burlesque producers across the country are connecting to share key sponsors — such as airlines — to help cross-pollinate the scenes and bolster community. We’ve also partnered with the New York School of Burlesque for Strip Search NYC where performers competed for the change to be the ambassador of New York burlesque scene to the Toronto Burlesque Festival. Would that qualify as an organised scene?

    There’s been a huge explosion of talent here in Toronto, particularly in the last three years. We have a large troupe of brilliant gents called Boylesque T.O. who will be assisting Hot Toddy, the Reigning King of Boylesque by Toddy’s special request next week at our festival. In town there are regular burlesque shows about four nights a week and there’s quite a diverse range of artistic expression. There’s classic, large-prop shows, rebel burlesque, performances with sideshow and/or fetish leanings, slapstick physical comedy, jazzy nightclub burlesque a la Forty Deuce, and more! There seem to be new troupes emerging every few months. For some of us there’s enough work that burlesque has become our sole livelihood. Would this qualify as a growing scene?

    I found it particularly interesting that in five names that you listed that had reference to dark skin that 40% came from the small pocket of Canada — Toronto actually. When it comes to culturally diverse performers in Toronto, off the top of my head I can rattle off Mahogany Storm, Nestle Chocolat, Fan Tan Fanny, Dainty Box, Ceci My Playmate, Miso Yum Yum, Cher E. Blossom, Rusty Wrong Note, Tiger Lily, etc. Did any of them pop up in your research?

    Your article raised some eyebrows with a number of my colleagues which is always healthy now and again for spice. I’ve discovered that while my personal ethnicity seems to be a bigger deal to others than it is to me, I feel far more ready to thrust a fist skyward over my Canadian-ness. One thing that this and other articles have done this week is inspire us to be more outspoken as Canadians, to make more of a joyful noise in the international forum about what we do. We’ve already started buzzing about some initiatives to ensure that Canada will stop being overlooked or mistaken for being some small pocket of burlesque.

    Thanks for the food for thought.

  23. Miss Coco Lectric wrote:

    My dear Ms. Tiara,

    Thank you for posting such a thoughtful article and being so honest and candid in your personal history and concerns. As a performer of color, and often a minority in the field of burlesque, I am well aware of the special consideration that must be paid as such. Unfortunately, race is of particular consideration for me because I live in Texas, where quite often I am treated differently because of the color of my skin. The southern US can be a bit of a hotbed of race relations. By doing a number such as “Indian Doll” that you sited, I am able to declare that I recognize such stereotypes and, yet, I am performing a classical and glamorous piece. The song is called Arizona Indian Doll and burlesque has a long history of cowboy and Indian themed numbers. I figured it would be a chance to utilize another American burlesque style, fan dancing, into my act. The “homage” to such heritage as is posted on the video is, in fact, a bit satirical.
    I, like most Americans and yourself, am a mix of many heritages. I am Spanish, French, Polynesian, Polish, and Native American to name a few. I have studied classical dance for many years: ballet, tap, jazz, modern, hip-hop, hula, Tahitian, Egyptian bellydance, flamenco, salsa, tango, and samba. I also used to compete in gymnastics. I often do incorporate many of the more “ethnic” styles into my performances, paying careful attention to the choice of music and the appropriateness of my movement for the sake of authenticity. However, burlesque is an art that does not limit the performer; it frees us.
    It is an art that emancipates women in a variety of ways, some of which you mentioned. We can express ourselves in sensual ways we cannot in certain parts of the world, or even just a few decades ago here in the US and other western countries. Just as we learned from the second wave of feminism, by limiting our actions we are also limiting ourselves as women, thus bringing about a new liberation with the third wave. We do not condemn women for acts that some may consider a step backward, such as being a stay-at-home mom or even a porn actress. We support each other. By the same token, performers of color, too, have the responsibility to support each other in whichever means they use to express themselves. Constructive criticism is always useful in art, but one must take into consideration the context of the art.
    I believe that you will find that women (and men) in the burlesque community are supportive of each other as artists and as people. In my years as a burlesque performer I have utilized my dark features to exemplify the beauty of being multicultural in an environment where it is not always accepted or appreciated, and I have found that by doing so I encourage other women of color to be proud of their diversity. However, most of the time I embody other characters that have absolutely nothing to do with race or color, unless you count Tangerine.
    I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors. Please send me a personal note on my page to discuss this topic further.

    Yours,

    Miss Coco Lectric

  24. Tiara the Merch Girl wrote:

    Hello Coco Framboise and Miss Coco Lectric! Thanks for coming by. Also thanks for the Canadian context – I didn’t realise I had somehow chosen majority Canadian people, I was following links off other burlesque people’s sites! My reference to them being small was from what I heard from people living there, as well as their general publicity compared to US/UK, tho as it seems there’s a lot more hiding than we realize ;)

    I notice that with the names it tends to depend on how new/established is – some have quite a bit of thought behind them, while some strike me as “oh, I’m brown, therefore I am Coco”. And I’m not sure whether that’s because the performer is lazy or because they feel a need to define themselves by their colour, mainly because *everyone else* does so. Half the time you can try to depict yourself as something completely random but get referred to as “That brown chick” anyway!! It takes some careful manuvering to not have to be The Token Exotic Chick.

    About the friendliness of the community: I would have said the same myself, but unfortunately I’ve faced some rather ugly backlash from people I had trusted when I tried to gentle and sensitively point out elements of their acts that were frankly quite problematic and stereotyped (as well as just lazy archetype choices!!). It seems the friendlier ones are far far away from me! At least even if you disagree you’re willing to discuss it openly – instead of dismissing folks like me as “extreme”, which is what I’ve had to face. sigh…

  25. pixilated wrote:

    i know i’m way late but i just wanted to let you know i found your burlesque routine incredibly moving and beautiful. i would love to see how you grow as an artist in this medium. i admit i can’t claim to have had much exposure to burlesque but i found this to be a refreshing perspective.

  26. Coco Framboise wrote:

    Tiara wrote:
    “I notice that with the names it tends to depend on how new/established is – some have quite a bit of thought behind them, while some strike me as ‘oh, I’m brown, therefore I am Coco.’ And I’m not sure whether that’s because the performer is lazy or because they feel a need to define themselves by their colour, mainly because *everyone else* does so.”

    One way to find out is to ask them. Performers are usually pretty easy to track down.

    I’m curious about why you feel that a name defines a person. I don’t feel that my name or my skin colour define me. They may or may not help pick me out of a crowd.

    Maybe we’re using the word “define” differently. What do you mean by it?