Beyond The Twins: Another look at Revenge Of The Fallen’s Character Flaws

By Special Correspondent Arturo R. García

fallentwins1

“It’s done in fun. I don’t know if it’s stereotypes — they are robots, by the way. These are the voice actors. This is kind of the direction they were taking the characters and we went with it.”
Michael Bay, as quoted by the Associated Press

This argument is, of course, sophistry. Bullsh-t, if you prefer. As was discussed over the weekend, Revenge Of The Fallen brought out the worst in Bay and writers Ehren Kruger, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci. And the “twins,” Skids and Mudflap, have only become a joke. As you read above, Michael Bay was content to throw voice actors Tom Kenny and Reno Wilson under the bus for the uproar they’ve caused. And let’s not forget, this film just flat-out sucks.

fallenposter1 But in this story, it’s alleged that Bay had a heavier hand in making the twins “fan-friendly.” It’s also been explained in the novelization of the film that their inability to read extends only to ancient Cybertronian, rather than contemporary language. In the Film School Rejects story, Wilson, who is black, offered this slightly more plausible explanation for Mudflap’s behavior:

“It’s an alien who uploaded information from the Internet and put together the conglomeration and formed this cadence, way of speaking and body language that was accumulated over X amount of years of information and that’s what came out … If he had uploaded country music, he would have come out like that.”

Not a bad spin, but it would’ve helped immeasurably if either Wilson’s explanation or the specifics of the twins’ reading difficulties had been written into the script. As it is, all we have to go on is what we get on screen, which isn’t pretty. But here’s the scariest thing about Revenge: the robots fare better as characters than the flesh-and-blood POCs, a fact consistent with these long-standing Michael Bay tenets:

tyreseduhamel1

1. The U.S. Military is always right. Every troop movement is given a fawning slo-mo deployment scene. When Jordanian allies arrive to back up Josh Duhamel and company against the Decepticons, they’re dispatched within seconds. It should also be noted that the authority figures (Duhamel, the captains and the general) are white males. Tyrese Gibson’s character, Master Sergeant Epps, could’ve been written more capably, but ended up so underwhelming he came off like a military version of this guy.

2. Liberals Are A-holes. Mr. Galloway, the political “liaison,” is coded as a liberal because he wears glasses and can’t handle himself in the field. He’s also indirectly linked to the Obama administration when the president is name-checked in the media during the Decepticon assault.

3. College Is Hot. Besides the ubiquitous Megan Fox, every woman we see on campus during Sam’s brief tenure there is dressed like they were plucked out of a Girls Of The ____ Conference spread. In the case of Alice the Decepticon (Isabel Lucas), at least we got a pay-off behind her appearance – she’s there to seduce and capture Sam. One can only imagine, though, that a non-sexual female antagonist would have been coded as a Liberal/”uptight” Women’s Studies major, complete with frumpy clothing and thick glasses.

4. Bloggers Are Not Normal. Leo (Ramon Rodríguez) and Agent Simmons (John Turturro) are both revealed to run online information sites and immediately coded – in Simmons’ case, this dates back to the previous film – as being “weird” conspiracy theorists. Leo and Sam’s other roomies are also cut-and-paste fanboy pastiches, another carry-over from the first film, where Sam’s only friend (who he ditches for Fox’s character) is utterly devoid of social skills.

5. People Of Color Are Funny. Leo’s character is harder on the eyes and ears than Skids and Mudflap, and not just because he takes up more screen time. Besides being bound to Rule #4, Leo is little more than a coward, a hanger-on and an easy target for tazer-related “humor.” During the scene in Simmons’ butcher shop, one of the employees, Yakov (Sean T. Krishnan) is shown with buck teeth and a bug-eyed expression as Simmons berates him. And then there’s the Egyptian border guard (Deep Roy) who magically lets our heroes into the country just because they’re from New York, despite not being able to communicate with Simmons in English.

Defenders of Revenge will say, “But it’s about giant robots fighting each other! What did you expect, Shakespeare?” This argument is also weak. As someone who grew up watching kaiju films and the original series, I wouldn’t have had a problem with just that. But we don’t get enough of those moments anywhere in this movie. And we certainly don’t get any sequences like this one, which, even if it was “kids’ stuff,” actually drew an emotional response when myself and other young people saw it back in the day.

The only character, white, non-white or robot, who drew a response in the Revenge screening I attended was Sam’s mother (Julie White), and that’s thanks to the cheap gags she was involved in. The controversy over Skids and Mudflap isn’t just because they’re pointless characters; they’re pointless characters who sum up the worst of Michael Bay’s excesses, and serves as another example of how Hollywood seems to insist on dealing with POCs. Are there “more important things to complain about”? Maybe. But this isn’t and shouldn’t be an either/or discussion. If POCs are asked to invest in “America’s No. 1 movie,” we can’t just be represented as cheap punchlines – these kinds of questions have to keep being asked, regardless of how well this film does at the box office.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. “Transformers 2″: The worst reviewed blockbuster of all time? | Joe’s Movie Lounge | STLtoday on 01 Jul 2009 at 12:55 am

    [...] sequel a mixed review, acknowledging its technical heft but criticizing its ideological emptiness, it turns out I was being a pushover. The movie, which earned more than $200 million through its [...]

  2. The “Transformers is utter shite and I REFUSE to spend $10 to acquire an elevated blood pressure” edition. | The Angry Black Woman on 28 Jul 2009 at 8:30 am

    [...] Came Running focuses on Why action movies should do away with comic relief. Racialicious inquires Why is it so hard for white writers to write three dimensional characters of colour? And why oh why …. Lj user nihilistic kid informs us:Uh film makers? You all seem to have forgotten the plot. And [...]

Comments

  1. B wrote:

    I don’t care if it’s about giant robots or if it’s Shakespeare, every single thing you’re complaining about was a choice that the movie’s makers made. With a budget that big, no one made decisions without thinking about it and choosing among many options. These things don’t happen by mistake. Does anyone really expect me to believe that, given how much money the last one made, and how much they expect this one to make, that they just threw a bunch of things against the wall and were surprised by the outcome? Of course not. It may not require much thinking on the viewer’s part to watch the movie, but the same can’t be said for those who made it.

  2. atlasien wrote:

    The fact that it’s about giant robots fighting each other makes the racism even more egregious. There’s nothing necessarily racist about giant robots fighting each other. Therefore, you have to really go the extra mile in order to inject the racism. And Michael Bay did. He has no excuse whatsoever.

    Sadly, this film is already a huge hit.

    Luckily, I don’t have to worry about taking my 7-year-old son to see it. He loves the cartoons. I’ve told him the Transformers movies are too violent (which they are, for his stage of development) and he accepts that.

    In a few years, I’ll have to explain that although he can now handle the violence level in the movie, it’s packed full of horrendous sexist and racist stereotypes due to the fact that the director is a mean-spirited boob-drooling troglodyte. I’m not looking forward to that conversation.

  3. Pickly wrote:

    Does anyone really expect me to believe that, given how much money the last one made, and how much they expect this one to make, that they just threw a bunch of things against the wall and were surprised by the outcome?

    Actually, this does seem to follow a trend. A lot of sequels, adaptations of comics, etc., in recent years have been described as being sort of thrown together (The theory being that, since movie companies know comic books and sequels will already have an audience, they don’t need to do much to get the audience back.)

    Whether this happened in this movie is not something I have the information to guess on. (Having not seen pretty much any movies in the past few months.)

  4. gatamala wrote:

    It’s not the discussion about racism that ruins a movie experience. It’s the racism that ruined the Transformers for me.

  5. Jehanzeb wrote:

    Michael Bay’s comment disturbs me. He doesn’t seem like he’s making an effort to understand how offensive the movie is to People of Color.

    Yes, Mr. Bay, we know their robots, but they’re voiced by real people. When their given human and stereotypical traits, they’re not “just robots” anymore. The audience laughs at them because they’re familiar with the stereotypes.

    Thanks for this post, Arturo. I like all the other points you brought up too.

  6. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist! wrote:

    What did you expect from a Michael Bay movie? I don’t know what are his political beliefs, but early in his career, he collaborated with Jerry Bruckheimer– a hardcore, big time, pro-Bush, Republican voter.

    Excuse me while I wipe the vomit from my mouth.

  7. Urban Suburbinite wrote:

    This movie was like one giant FU.

    Illiterate Sambots = FU Black people

    Criminal Gumbabot = FU Italians (My Sicilian fiance who was already pissed about the Sambots, threw his hands in the air and proclaimed “what the f*ck? in the middle of the theater.)

    “pubic fro head” comment to John Tuturo’s character=FU Jewish people + Why isn’t anyone complaining about this? It’s just as bad as the Sambots. (Tuturo sometimes plays Italian, sometimes Jewish. I guess he has that Andy Garcia interchangability.

    Megan Fox being made a useless walking Maxim pictorial = FU Women. She could stand to take lessons from Mila Jovavich in “Resident Evil” or Rosario Dawson “DeathProof” or “Sin City” on how to be sexy AND badass.

    Being teleported to Egypt, but running 6 miles instead of teleporting again, or riding in bumblebee = FU people with 1/2 a brain.

    Legendary, Fail.

    I really feel for non-white children watching this garbage. I have good childhood memories of watching Terminator, Robocop, Predator I & II and not seeing my nor other cultures blatantly stereotyped and disrespected.

    Now if I want to see things explode, I’ll just watch Jay-Z’s DOA (Death of Autotune). It’s more entertaining.

  8. Urban Suburbinite wrote:

    I feel sorry for white children watching this too.

  9. April wrote:

    I refuse the subject myself to this kind of crap. I used to be a Bay fan (I liked Bad Boys), but I will think twice before ever seening another of his films. That goes double for the writer.

  10. Eric wrote:

    The fact that this movie made an assload of money in just its first week is what’s most depressing to me. That people make this kind of media okay with their dollars by going out and seeing it, without asking a single critical question. It doesn’t surprise me one whit, but it certainly depresses the snot out of me.

  11. hlynn wrote:

    Bay is a shitty director. When I heard he was directing the first movie, I didn’t want to go and see it. I eventually saw it and, surprisingly, I really liked it. However, I think Spielberg reigned in some of Bay’s Bay-ish-ness (for a lack of a better term) that seems to have made this movie a thousand levels of Fail.

  12. FilthyGrandeur wrote:

    this movie was such a train wreck. there was just so much wrong with it, particularly with how Bay deals with the twins and with women: http://filthygrandeur.blogspot.com/2009/06/transformers-revenge-of-fallen.html

    to me, the twins were just new versions of the Dumbo crows…

  13. Seattle Slim wrote:

    Someone said this already, but I wanted to add this.

    Growing up I was, and still am (two tats to prove it, some merch, tearing up at the DVDs lol you get it) of Transformers (mostly G1). It, for me, (just like thundercats) was really post-racial in the sense that I really felt that I could be included. Personally, I thought Soundwave was black-ish back then (I think I associated the Boombox with rap and rap with race). This is why this breaks my heart because this is a GOOD cartoon. It was and still is (not that animated mess, gross). There was no skanks, no Gumba-bots, no Sambots, no POCs really being ridiculed, etc. Everyone involved went SOOOOO far in making this a freaking joke.

    I’m now wishing that Megan Fox’s dumb @$$ was the only thing I had to worry about.

    I’m going to go and see this because BF wants to go, but I think it will make for an interesting blog post and discussion. BF being a WM makes it a little easier for him to go, eventhough he’s like “WTF” at the Sambots. Regardless, he still wants to see it and can you blame him? It’s not his folks that are getting that much ridicule (with the exception of the liberal). And he’s not an “excessive liberal” so that’s not going to goad him much either.

    I hope this is a learning lesson for him and as for me, when the POC ridicule comes on, I’m going to let it be known that it’s not cool and walk the hell out. Call me when the assault on my sanity is done.

    As for my son seeing this? HA! Never. Not gonna happen.

  14. Ejunco wrote:

    Hopefully the writers find out about this blog and others and maybe they’ll fix the f-ups they did and maybe make the third one more serious.

  15. Aishtamid wrote:

    I saw this movie over the weekend and had two thoughts:

    1. Those black robots were cringe-inducing. They would never have gotten away with showing real black people act like that. They couldn’t read…it was like watching robo-Amos ‘n Andy. It actually made my stomach turn.

    2. Interesting how college is 99% white and 100% ridiculously hot people.

    My friends wanted to see Hangover right after this and so we did…oy. It was a long night.

    @urban suburbanite – I totally agree with the FU to women. There were only three female characters: Megan Fox, who just stands around and looks good, the temptress fembot, and Sam’s mother, who is pretty much every sexist stereotype there is that Fox and the fembot don’t already cover.

  16. RMJ wrote:

    It’s not Shakespeare is an eternally invalid argument. More impressionable young people will see Transformers this year than read/see Shakespeare, which only makes it MORE relevant and worthy of discussion.

    Also note that only the voice actor of color has a cohesive explanation for the race of his character. The white actor who voices the other autobot is practically in blackface, isn’t he?

  17. Aishtamid wrote:

    @Seattle –

    I also watched Transformers growing up, including the original animated movie. They were wicked cheesy, but there was no racist, sexist bs like there is in the new movies.

  18. Seattle Slim wrote:

    @Aishtamid I hear that!
    @RMJ

    *clapping* So, so true. There’s not a comparison to Shakespeare to shake this mess off. But that’s another convo.

    When I saw the first one, I was mad at that one. I was not even a month pregnant with Stay Puft Jr. and I was so irate when I got to the house, that BF had to calm me down. All I can say is I’m not pregnant this year, so there will be nothing to assuage the rage that will most likely follow when the credits are rolling.

  19. FilthyGrandeur wrote:

    @RMJ–

    it’s not the first time a white voice actor has engaged in blackface:
    http://kissmyblackads.blogspot.com/2009/05/fox-cleveland-show.html

    personally i’m a little saddened that Tom Kenny would agree to voice one of these racist twins (we all know him as the voice of Spongebob). it’s quite sad…

  20. ktrujillo wrote:

    “FU Women…”

    The apple scene in astronomy class was one of the biggest ‘FU women’ in that movie. In fact, the whole Harvard portion of that film was one big ‘FU women’.

  21. Kendra wrote:

    Little black Sambo . . . robot.

    Sambo + Robot = Sambot

  22. RCHOUDH wrote:

    Can someone explain to me how can a “fembot” seduce Sam with him not knowing she was a robot?? I refuse to watch this piece of crap (unless it’s for free) so I’m wondering how the fembot looked? Was she human looking but then transformed (how the hell can she transform into something mechanical if she looks human???) Or was she robotic looking (how the hell can she seduce Sam then without him knowing she’s a robot???)

  23. ktrujillo wrote:

    Twin loses ‘gold tooth’, “mah toof! he exclaims. Nuff said.

  24. ktrujillo wrote:

    Can someone explain to me how can a “fembot” seduce Sam with him not knowing she was a robot??

    She appeared to possess all of the attributes valued by superficial males.

  25. Aishtamid wrote:

    @RCHOUDH –

    She was a robot that somehow disguised herself as a woman…until they started making out and she used her 10 foot long robot tongue to try to strangle him.

    It doesn’t have to make sense. Let’s remember which movie we’re talking about.

  26. Urban Suburbinite wrote:

    Re: Evil Fembot

    She reminded me of “Species”.

  27. RCHOUDH wrote:

    Thanks guys for letting me know:) She sounds to be like a Terminatrix knock-off (and I thought T3 was crap so I don’t hold out much hope for liking this movie either).

    @ AishTamid
    LOL!

  28. Lxy wrote:

    What’s more disturbing?

    Those 5 “Michael Bay tenets” found in Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen.

    Or the fact that the movie is America’s number 1 film, grossing over $200 million so far in spite of–or maybe because of–these tenets.

  29. Persia wrote:

    The fact that it’s about giant robots fighting each other makes the racism even more egregious. There’s nothing necessarily racist about giant robots fighting each other. Therefore, you have to really go the extra mile in order to inject the racism.

    Total 100% agreement.

    I’m hoping there’s a big box-office drop off after the first weekend, because all the ‘I wanna see giant robots beating each other up’ people will go home and tell their friends it was crap.

    My hopes aren’t high, though.

  30. Urban Suburbinite wrote:

    They’re actually some people who see nothing wrong with this.

    http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/mwop/moviefile/2009/06/ten-ways-transformers-2-is-bet.php#more> 10 Ways Transformers 2 is Better Than Transformers 1

    I just reposted there what I posted here

  31. sodium xiong wrote:

    well transformers 2 could be true in the future and that doesn’t mean i beleive it will be true but it could be true about robot that become alive and living in this Earth.. many people have many ideas about the movie..

  32. EEW wrote:

    Kurtzman & Orci can say/write what they like. But they also had a little stereotype problem in THE PROPOSAL. As if decimation of a culture was not enough, K&O have Betty Davis whooping it up Native American-style by way of out-of-touch writers in full headdress around a boom box. Yes, there is plenty to complain about with Michael Bay. PLENTY. But prior to hooking up with K&O he did not have that level of racism in his previous films. K&O should perhaps take some responsibility for their writing. But once again they will probably just blame the director.

  33. gib wrote:

    I have not seen the movie nor will I, unless my nephew who owns the first one and I am sure will own this one makes me watch it. I watched the first one with him on DVD because he said it was the best movie he had ever seen. I knew I would disagree because he was 17 years old, but I figured it must be worth watching. I was wrong. All that to say that I am commenting without knowing my subject. I know, it’s wrong. But I have to agree with B here. A movie that has a budget that big knows exactly what it is doing every step of the way. Of course Michael Bay had his hands on what the voice actors were doing. And I heard that one of the twins had a gold tooth, come on. Are you telling me that was not discussed years before this movie began shooting? And I agree that you have to go that extra mile to somehow end up with robots portraying a stereotype.
    And of course there are people who don’t care or see anything wrong with allowing their children to see it. Because it wasn’t blatant. Robots were not lynching each other or wearing white hoods so how can you call it racist? While discussing Disney and its hidden racism in class today, one student said he grew up just fine on Disney so his kids could watch it. And then maybe when they got older, he would explain that somethings are not as they seem in these movies. I don’t think he realized he was just perpetuating the cycle. Sad that after four weeks in this race and gender in the media class, he doesn’t really get it.

  34. Whitney wrote:

    @EEW: Re: The Proposal

    I think you mean Betty White? I saw it, and I recall her saying that her great-grandmother was Native American (although I can’t recall which tribe/nation), but still, that scene was pretty stupid and unfunny. Anyways, the character stereotype that bothered me more was Ramone, although I love Oscar Nunez (who plays Ramone) in The Office.

  35. Titanis walleri wrote:

    The woman is essentially a Pretender (a Transformers inside a, usually organic, shell), a subvariety of Transformer that’s existed since the 80s.

    http://transformers.wikia.com/wiki/Pretender

  36. dejamorgana wrote:

    Everything Arturo says here is spot on, but I would add one more rule to the “Bay’s Rules” he mentions:

    Rule 6: the rest of the world doesn’t count. In fact, we’re not quite sure there is such a place.

    Michael Bay truly doesn’t seem to believe that the world outside of the US has any kind of reason for being. Every non-American character he shows is either a clown, an enemy or a lickspittle (check out the wonderful smiling Arab boy who is giddy at the chance to fetch some water or carry some gear for the brave Yankee soldiers in Trans 1). In this movie he all but destroys Shanghai in the very first scene, in a pitched battle between a Decepticon and the US army. Because, of course, China does not have an army, and the Chinese would be more than happy to let the American army roll into one of their largest cities and start blowing shit up. Right?

    Later on, he sideswipes French culture (poor Eiffel Tower, it gets destroyed twice in this summer’s blockbusters!) and then moves on to the Middle East, where he perpetuates the old “Alien Architect” idea that primitive brown people couldn’t possibly have built impressive structures like the Pyramids and the Petra monuments without help from aliens. He also plays fast and loose with Middle Eastern geography, makes the Egyptian and Jordanian military forces look like the Keystone Kops, ignores the fact that there is a city larger than New York in spitting distance of the Pyramids, and once again unleashes a full-scale invasion of a foreign country by American forces without a second’s hesitation or any sign of native resistance.

    What Bay has done in both Transformers movies, but much more so in this one, is show his audience that Arabs and Chinese people simply don’t matter. They have no armies to speak of. They have no backbone. In the case of the Arabs, they don’t even have cities, just a bunch of tents and ruins in the middle of the desert. They ride around on camels and exist only to provide minor support roles for our military, jobs like cleaning their boots and supplying them with radios.

    I could go on about the many ways this movie was insulting, but it’s getting late and I already wrote a review of it, so (hoping it’s okay to do this here) I’ll just post a link to it:

    http://everything2.com/title/Transformers%25202%253A%2520Revenge%2520of%2520the%2520Fallen

    As Roger Ebert famously said, I hated, hated, hated this movie. Not only for its racism and xenophobic ideals, but for the fact that it was complete crap. Transformers 1 had plenty of racism (moment of silence for Jazz, please…), but not quite on the same level as this one. It also had a much more coherent plot, far less juvenile humor, and a shorter runtime. And I’d take Jazz over the Twins any day.

  37. Natalia wrote:

    Urban Suburbinite I went on to the website that you left a link for and someone actually said this:

    “oh and btw sleepwalker12… how is that racist? all Bay did was simply act out how all of the races actually act right? so why are you hating so much? you just jealous that you didn’t make a B.A movie like him? or are you just that effing retarded? go cry about it.”

    It was obviously written by a teenager with the whole “why are you hating?… you are just jealous” but I just don’t know what to think…

  38. Hibbs4Prez wrote:

    Kurtzman & Orci did not write The Proposal. I recently listened to an hour-long podcast interview of the Creative Screenwriter show. The subject/guest was the actual writer. He had a short stint working for K & O’s production company. He got his script read by using a fake name (a female name). When the movie was greenlit Kurtzman and Orci were too busy with all of their other projects to spend much time on The Proposal.

  39. Urban Suburbinite wrote:

    dejamorgana,
    I agree with everything you said. [Except one Nitpic] Egypt is an African country, not middle eastern. It has always irked me how Egypt is not considered African, especially by the media. Yes it has a large population of people who migrated from the middle east and bringing their culture with them culture, but it is still on the continent of Africa. If you look at the bust of Nefertiti, she looks like many black women I see today.

    http://www.101destinations.com/images/Nefertiti_berlin.jpg

    http://access.nscpcdn.com/gallery/i/w/wnew_nefertiti/nefertiti1.jpg

    I see Pharaoh Tutankhamun in the faces of brothers on the street.

    http://i.thisislondon.co.uk/i/pix/2007/07/tutankhamun_243×324.jpg

    It makes me feel like because Egypt was an empire, they want to remove all historical blackness from it.

    I know people will say “but the culture” this, or “the population” that, but if we go by that Miami would be part of Cuba, and Long Island part of Italy, rather than American cities rich with Cuban, and Italian culture respectively.

    I know so off topic, but yeah T2- Rise of the Sambots sucked.

  40. Kim wrote:

    @EEW
    “K&O should perhaps take some responsibility for their writing. But once again they will probably just blame the director.”

    Actually, the did just that!
    http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2009/06/orci-kurtzman-disavow-minstrelbots

    There was also discussion somewhere on the interwebs about how they submitted an outline for the script the night before the writer’s strike, and when that finished they came back to find out that Bay had already gone into production on many of the scenes… implying that he filled in a lot of the script himself. In fact, on the Transformers forums they even apologized ahead of time for any bad things that might happen as a result of the writer’s strike. It is a mystery…

  41. dejamorgana wrote:

    @ Urban Suburbinite, you are right that Egypt is an African country, but it is also Middle Eastern. The Middle East is a transcontinental geopolitical area that does include Egypt. Egypt is dual natured (as is most of the Middle East, actually).

    Geographically, there’s no disputing the fact that Egypt is African. From a geological perspective, Africa has a definitive border in the Syro-African Fault, which runs right up under the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aqaba, and up along Israel’s eastern border. Most people don’t realise that Israel, Lebanon and part of Syria are actually on the African tectonic plate and are therefore African countries!

    Political realities being what they are, it’s easier for everyone to pretend that Africa ends at the Gulf of Suez, making the Sinai Peninsula, Israel and Lebanon purely Eurasian. In the same way, we pretend that Egypt is purely an Arab country (and I apologize for reinforcing that idea in my T2 review. My excuse is, that’s how Michael Bay depicts the country). But I guarantee that if you travel around Egypt much, you will find a lot of people with conventionally African features.

    As if that wasn’t far enough off topic, I’ve got a romantic/political anecdote: one of the very (very!) few times anybody has openly told my wife and me that we shouldn’t be together because of our races was in Egypt. My wife (girlfriend at the time) was *this* close to buying some perfume in Cairo. The owner of the shop had served us coffee, introduced us to his brother, shown us some truly beautiful glass bottles and all but taken her money, when he decided to play up their shared African heritage which, as he said with some undisguised pointed looks at me, “the Boers can never understand”. He didn’t mean “boors” – he talked to her at length about South African racial politics and even knew some Afrikaans, and continued to implicate me as the oppressor. I actually would have let it go, because my wife clearly wanted the perfume. But as soon as he said that, she didn’t want it anymore.

    I’m still not sure what the guy was thinking when he started all this, but he was definitely an example of an Egyptian who was proud to be African. And I’m just as definitely lucky that love has nothing to do with race.

    (Sorry to gush, I’ve been holding that story in for almost fifteen years!)