The Intersection of Race and Steampunk: Colonialism’s After-Effects & Other Stories, from a Steampunk of Colour’s Perspective [Essay]

by Guest Contributor (and regular commenter) Jha

Steampunk! Variously described as an aesthetic, a genre within scifi/fantasy that sprouted from cyberpunk, and a subculture vaguely related to the goth counter-culture. Like many other things with vague origins and a tenuous identity that overlaps with others, it is hard to pin down what steampunk is.

The only that we can all seem to agree on is the aesthetic involved. In a way, it’s a lot like the SCA’s medieval roleplaying, trying to recreate the past with all the good stuff and none of the bad. For other steampunks, it’s a lifestyle movement, in which they transform practical items into works of art and live their lives with exquisite manners.

Here’s a good summary of the literary genre stemming from the 1980s, written by Lavie Tidhar. Cory Gross of Voyages Extraordinaire has a very comprehensive history, delving deep into not just the literary but also the film aspect of the aesthetic before the actual term was used and the evolution of the movement afterwards in literature, RPGs, graphic novels, anime and the general subculture afterward. In Steampunk Magazine’s first issue, the essay “What Then, Is Steampunk? Colonizing the Past so we can Dream the Future”, stridently declares, “First and foremost, steampunk is a non-luddite critique of technology. It rejects the ultra-hip dystopia of the cyberpunks—black rain and nihilistic posturing—while simultaneously forfeiting the ‘noble savage’ fantasy of the pre-technological era. It revels in the concrete reality of technology instead of the over-analytical abstractness of cybernetics” (4).

Steampunks express themselves with Victorian-inspired clothing (or costumes). Goggles, chains and pocketwatches are typical gear for a steampunk. Steampunk styles range from fastidiously neat (streamlined, heavy clothes typical of Victorian aristocracy/middle-class, e.g. anarchronaut) to greasemonkey bricolage (dreadlocks, the ‘airship pirate’ look, merging with more ‘mainstream’ punk fare, e.g. Abney Park). For a sense of the visual aesthetic, one should look to the 1999 movie Wild Wild West (although it’s a terrible movie) and the graphic novel League of Extraordinary Gentlemen by Alan Moore. Cory Gross discusses the two ends of the Steampunk spectrum in his essay “Varieties of Steampunk Experience”: Nostalgic Steampunk, which idealizes the Victorian era as it should have been, and the Melancholic Steampunk, which focuses on the gritty reality of the Victorian era, bringing to the fore the dirt and soot and grime (60 – 63). Japan has its own steampunk movement, the most cited example of its technology-focused aesthetic can be seen in the anime Steamboy. (I’m not going to touch Japanese steampunk in this article.)

Steampunk is still an emergent subculture, gaining ground fast with its DIY creativity and elegant nostalgia. Stephen H. Segal has a cute article on why steampunk is considered friendly, even optimistic despite drawing inspiration from what was a very oppressive era. As a genre that’s in its adolescence, the rules (if indeed any counter-culture has rules) haven’t been set in stone. But it’s getting attention anyway: the New York Times did an article on steampunk fashion last year.

This is where being a Steampunk of Colour comes in.

Problems Peculiar to Steampunk

As an emergent subculture, steampunk has its various factions of participants. The steamfashion LiveJournal and Facebook community believe that “the ‘punk’ in steampunk is a cute turn of phrase used because it sounds interesting and exciting, without any deeper meaning than that.” Dr. Dru Pagliassotti asks if steampunk has politics, and if so, what its ideology is. Steampunk Scholar Mark Perschon wrests with the definition of steampunk through his reading. This is the most universal problem for steampunks: trying to define just what steampunk is (without limiting the discussion to what it is not).

Steampunk has problems for the average person of colour who can’t ignore the colour of their skin. I attended a steampunk-themed party once; the attendees were forty-strong, and I was the only PoC. Ay-Leen the Peacemaker, who spoke at a steampunk panel at AnimeBoston recently, counted one PoC besides herself at a mass photoshoot. As any PoC knows, it’s pretty awkward being the token minority in any setting, even if we’re not treated like one.

Which is why I want to point out the NYT article again: the three men featured are clearly of colour, and it was a relief to see them after seeing scores and scores of white steampunks. Another notable person is anachronaut, a half-Asian fashion designer who wrote:

“I don’t know if I’d even consider the look ‘steampunk’, more of an abstract 19th century cargo cult. It’s partially based on the images I’ve seen of native cultures dominated by industrialized societies. Wearing the clothes of the imperialists, adopting their mannerisms, but retaining an identity in their hair and skin. There’s an odd subjugation yet an ownership of the style in these old photos. Take the trappings of your enemy and wear them in your own way, use them against them.”

He said it here.

Nevertheless, his talk about wearing the clothes of the imperialist doesn’t necessarily resolve one of my main issues as a steampunk of colour: if I buy into this aesthetic, what does it say about how I feel towards my own culture? Do I appropriate Victorianism as someone who’s clearly a minority? (Is that possible?) How does my cultural identity play into my steampunk’d sense of fashion?

This is a question that many a steampunk asks, even those who are white and descended from peoples that the Victorians oppressed. How do we take the trappings of the enemy and use it against them without simply assimilating into the imperialist’s culture?

Another major problem with steampunk is that it romanticizes a Victorian era. While the British empire was arguably cosmopolitan (cue the ORLY owl), it was still racist, classist, sexist, and all-round oppressive. The Victorians, busy with industrializing their country, couldn’t even be bothered to care for their own, and their Far East colonies were Oriental, spaces of Other, where they got tea, mined for tin, and imported their fine china from.

But steampunks are not necessarily racist. Many steampunks don’t feel weirded out by PoC wanting to participate in their subculture, and a few welcome them (for reasons I personally find suspect). Steampunks are not necessarily sexist – the average steampunk woman is as likely to wear trousers as they are petticoats, and we like to wear our corsets on the outside to express our sexuality. Nor is classism a steampunk dominion, as steampunk outfits are just as likely to be cobbled together from thrift stores as they are bought from craftspeople. Anybody with some time, resources, DIY ethic, inspiration can contribute to the bricolage nature of steampunk’s aesthetics. It’s not just for the elite.

But like in other subcultures, it can involve any of these -isms, because we bring along our attendant baggage from the mainstream culture, which is predominantly white and has on many occasions ignored such various concerns.

A PoC’s Context

I’m aware that other steampunks come to the subculture differently. Our stories are as diverse as our backgrounds, our reasons for participating are many. Interests tend to overlap in steampunk; we’re all geeks in some form or another. Reasons for being drawn to the subculture are various: a love for history, a love for speculative fiction, the giant robots, the ray guns, the fabulous clothes.

Before I explain further my interest in this subculture, I should give some context on myself: I was born and raised in Malaysia, a nation formerly part of the British Commonwealth, colonized from the 1600s until after World War II. Many things British still exist: it manifests in our education systems, the fact that English is a common second (and first) language for folks middle-class and above, our parliament, et al. I grew up reading English literature, and eventually left to get a Canadian degree in English. Malaysia has its own peculiar set of problems with regard to race and nationality, some of which are after-effects from our dual history (of British colonialism versus Islamic influence).

I sometimes feel my “Western” sensibilities are after-effects of British colonialism, or Western imperialism in general – it would explain my disdain for Malaysian culture when growing up, the admiration for Westerners who seemed so individualistic, who had all those bright ideas, who wrote such interesting stories that even a person on the other side of the world felt transported by them. (And then RaceFail happened…)

I was not initially interested in the steampunk aesthetic. While I always admired steampunks from a distance, enjoying their gadgetry, their fine clothes, and outgoing individuality, one of the major problems with steampunk, of course, like with many other genres, is the fact that the default steampunk is probably white. And I am clearly not white. Corsets looked uncomfortable. I’m Asian and it looks weird being Asian and wearing such specifically Western clothes (although my everyday clothes are, in themselves, Western). My literary interests leaned towards “the classics”.

I came to steampunk in a roundabout way: through my studies in English literature, I followed a path towards science fiction and fantasy, and was piqued by Victorian science fiction. How interesting that they dreamt up such things in such times! I thought, while at the same time thinking that Victorians were terribly, terribly boring people. I relented when I realized that Dickens was generally paid by wordcount for his serials. I studied literature of the fin de sieclé, John Stuart Mill, and predominantly Oscar Wilde.

So I liked how steampunk trotted Victorianism out into the present. I had my reservations about it. I didn’t want to alienate myself from my own heritage more than I already was. But I was galvanized when I read Girl Genius. Kaja Foglio, one of Girl Genius’ creators, admits to there being much more “steam”, and she uses “gaslamp fantasy” to describe the epic webcomic. That’s not the important bit here. The important bit is that Girl Genius revises the history of Europe, presenting an alternate version called Europa, where mad scientists rule and political alignment is vastly different from what we know of European history.

This is one of the many possibilities offered by the steampunk literary genre.

Let’s imagine an Asia which was industrialized enough to take on colonial powers, to resist Western colonialism, and assert itself on the face of the map. An Asia which is not the Far East, but dominion of the Middle Kingdom (as China once called itself), whose culture was not meant for Western consumption and appropriation but commodified for assimilation by Westerners themselves. An Asia that is not the Mysterious Orient, but an assertive culture (or several) that stands on par with Western imperial powers. Admittedly, this Asia would have China and Japan as major powers, and the whole thing would still be a power struggle, and it would probably still be very racist – nonetheless, it would be an Asia which is visible, that demanded and got representation, which exists as its own entity in the consciousness of today, as opposed to being an Other shaped by assumptions.

This was how I really got into steampunk and started identifying myself as one: that dream of historical revisionism in scifi/fantasy where my heritage is worth a damn rather than some exotic element that makes a story more exciting. Looking at the socio-political commentary of the Victorian era, I allowed my undergrad degree to inform my view of steampunk – Elizabeth Barrett-Browning wrote about poverty, Wilde was a homosexual, Mill believed in liberty; these are still valid issues, wherever the geography, and instead of simply limiting myself to what they said, I could add it to my own commentary, building on their words. Not only that, but it drove me to research my own country’s activities during the era.

Also, I like corsets, ray guns and Victorian fashion. In tandem. Part of the joy in steampunk is the self-reflexivity involved.

Possible Roles for PoC

Because steampunk is currently so fluid, it is subject to many influences, opinions, and the building of work within it. Some find it a more welcoming space compared to other subcultures; some think it’s already closed its doors. I’m a more optimistic kind. While steampunk spaces are admittedly very “white”, the beautiful thing is that it doesn’t have to be that way. After the RaceFail conversation(s), it becomes even more important for PoC to assert themselves into spaces of their interest. As said on the LiveJournal comm steampunkdebate by klgaffney:

“i think it’d be great if steampunk could adopt the race/religion/creed all-inclusiveness as a major hallmark from the get-go, and be able to back that up with actually, y’know, walking the walk, as opposed to having to salvage a bad reputation later, as some subcultures have had to. seriously. it would save so much grief and bad press, down the road.”

I believe that the youth of the subculture makes it an ideal space for PoC to step in and take a hand in shaping it so it is more inclusive and more welcoming of diversity. The Victorian age was oppressive and colonialist; the steampunk subculture can allow for liberation and diversity. The alternate history aspect of steampunk enables a wider playground for PoC to assert their cultural backgrounds in their many forms of expressions. The Internet – ah! the Internetz! – makes it difficult to be unaware of the cultural issues that both bind and break peoples in participating.

The ‘punk’ in ’steampunk’ is indicative of a counter-culture, and to be a minority participating in steampunk is counter-culture in itself, as we are asserting our presences in what was white Victorian space, and what is still part of default white culture. And we can do it in a way that is cheerful, joyfully creative, with its brass, goggles, clockwork, and friendly non-discriminating sepia tones.

Some Bibliography and Recommended Reading:

Catastrophone Orchestra and Arts Collective (NYC). “What Then, Is Steampunk?” Steampunk Magazine. Issue 1.
Cory Gross. “Varieties of Steampunk Experience.” Steampunk Magazine. Issue 1.
http://www.steampunkmagazine.com/inside/downloads/

Ruth La Ferla. “Steampunk Moves Between Two Worlds.” New York Times. May 8, 2008.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/fashion/08PUNK.html

Cory Gross. “A History of Steampunk.” Voyages Extraordinaires. August 28, 2008.
http://voyagesextraordinaires.blogspot.com/2008/08/history-of-steampunk.html

Lavie Tidhar. “Steampunk.” Sub-Genre Spotlight, The Internet Review of Science Fiction. February 2005.
http://www.irosf.com/q/zine/article/10114

Stephen H. Segal. “Five Thoughts on the Popularity of Steampunk.” Fantasy Magazine. September 17, 2008.
http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=928

Dru Pagliassotti. “Does Steampunk Have Politics?” The Mark of Ashen Wings. February 11, 2009.
http://ashenwings.com/marks/2009/02/11/does-steampunk-have-politics/

Dru Pagliasotti. “Does Steampunk Have an Ideology?” The Mark of Ashen Wings. February 13, 2009.
http://ashenwings.com/marks/2009/02/13/does-steampunk-have-an-ideology/

(Image Credits: Steampunks from the New York Times, A Steampunk-modded PC, RPGFan image of a ship from Skies of Arcadia: Legends, Art from Fullmetal Alchemist: Conqueror of Shambala, A Steampunk Laptop from Datamancer)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Steampunk and people of color at Tobias Buckell Online on 25 Jun 2009 at 1:11 pm

    [...] writer Jha has a very fascinating essay up about Steampunk and the mixed feelings one may have about it due to the neo-Victorianism aspect [...]

  2. The Great Geek Manual » Geek Media Round-Up: June 26, 2009 on 27 Jun 2009 at 11:08 am

    [...] The Intersection of Race and Steampunk: Colonialism’s After-Effects & Other Stories, from a Steampunk of Colour’s Perspective. [...]

  3. Links for 1st July 2009 | Velcro City Tourist Board on 01 Jul 2009 at 8:05 pm

    [...] The Intersection of Race and Steampunk: Colonialism’s After-Effects & Other Stories, from … [...]

  4. Linkspam…The “I hate death dammit!” edition | The Angry Black Woman on 28 Jul 2009 at 8:30 am

    [...] The Intersection of Race and Steampunk: Colonialism’s After-Effects & Other Stories, from a St… Excellent article. But Racialicious consistently brings the cool, don’t they? [...]

Comments

  1. B wrote:

    Awesome article, thanks! I’m a huge fan of steampunk literature. I’m not familiar with the subculture outside of it, though, and I’m a little curious about your comment that steampunk romanticizes the Victorian era, which was in reality very -ist.

    All of the steampunk novels I’ve read heavily focus on classism. Most of them are told from the point of view of someone from the underclass, and feature class struggles and uprisings against the oppression. From your article, it sounds like other parts of the subculture don’t really touch on this?

    I’m currently thinking through the characters from the books, though, and no one springs to mind as a POC except the Asian characters who operate the opium dens. So I completely can understand the other parts of your article which discuss the steampunk space with regards to POC.

    Gonna explore the links you included, thanks!

  2. Tiara the Merch Girl wrote:

    Hello Jha ;)
    Fantastic article; thank you for this really interesting look into your subculture from a perspective people don’t really consider. I’m pretty involved in a white-heavy subculture too (burlesque) and come from a similar background to yours (as you know ;P) and I could relate SO MUCH to the issues you bring up.
    I’d love to read the other responses – how have the rest of steampunkland reacted?

  3. Deena wrote:

    Thanks for this essay! I don’t have much familiarity with steampunk, but I had always read it as something very white, and had felt that it was problematic to idealize a time that was not ideal for people who were not straight white men of some means. The idea is cool, and I like goggles and gears, but I wasn’t sure if it was being executed in a way that was inclusive and respectful.

    Thank you for your perspective and the bibliography!

  4. Persia wrote:

    This is a really great essay, synthesizing some of the things I’ve seen around and about in a really positive, encouraging way.

    And oh, I love Fullmetal Alchemist.

  5. Pickly wrote:

    Nevertheless, his talk about wearing the clothes of the imperialist doesn’t necessarily resolve one of my main issues as a steampunk of colour: if I buy into this aesthetic, what does it say about how I feel towards my own culture? Do I appropriate Victorianism as someone who’s clearly a minority? (Is that possible?) How does my cultural identity play into my steampunk’d sense of fashion?

    It’s always seemed strange for a couple of reasons when people bring up questions like these (when talking about how cultures interact, or issues with other cultures.)

    It’s not as if other cultures haven’t been shaped by invasions, trade, economic dominance, etc., before Europe and the U.S. started taking over a lot of places. (english language itself, from how I’ve understood it, comes from two invading groups who dominated a native population, plus some economic/political dominance by London, plus a lot of borrowing from other languages), and when talking about “native” or “own” culture vs. “invader”, it always brings up questions of when, if ever, the line is drawn in time between when one would become another. (and also where the line between “I just find it interesting”, and “Your betraying the culture/being dominated by someone else’s culture” is supposed to be drawn.)

    The other oddity is how in fantasy/Sci-fi settings in particular, and art in general, that when it comes to world/image /story creation, there really isn’t any theoretical limits (apart from issues like “does the world make sense”.) and that a lot of expectations that go into superhero stories, fantasy stories, futuristic, steampunk, etc., aren’t limits with the stories or images themselves as with the people using them.

    It might just be a personal thing, but you imagining an 1800’s world where Europe and Asia were more equally powerful (As described in the post), just seems like a quite natural thing to do, while if someone were to challenge it for not being correct for steampunk would not make sense. (though I don’t tend to get heavily involved with subcultures in general, so it could well be that the problems of social groups tightening expectations come into play a lot.)

  6. A.D. Nix wrote:

    I am really excited to see this addressed here. I’m interested in steampunk (as in, I often enjoy looking, but I’m not brass-ing out my laptop anytime soon) and have been thinking a lot about how/why I don’t have the same depth of anxiety and conflict in relation to it as a PoC as I do with, say, Goth culture or some of its other close-cousins in edited nostalgia. And I think this piece really articulates a lot of that.

    These are definitely things I’ll be keeping in mind as I prep for the magical escape/socio-political minefield that is Comic-Con.

  7. ghettoManga wrote:

    fascinating.
    i get a lot of flack for enjoying Wild Wild West for the first 60-75% of the film, largely because of the steampunk elements (Will Smith was clean as the dapper black gunslinger too), and i have enjoyed many steampunk comics and graphic novels (including one just called “Steampunk” by Joe Kelly and Chris Bachalo).

    although i am quite the nerd for comics and sci-fi, i never quite got around to letting it influence my fashion sense (being a nerd for hip hop takes care of that quite nicely). maybe that’s why i don’t take those kinds of issues too seriously.

    i like the idea of using the genre for revisionist history that doesn’t center on Europe. there is a futuristic cartoon in production by Wesley Snipes called Zulu Mech or something like that revolving around and African superstate with technology that reminds me of steampunk (from what i’ve seen anyways) merged with African tribal masks…

    but i’m really just rambling. great article!

  8. Natasha wrote:

    Great article, a ton of food for thought. Although, I always thought of steampunk as a big “what if?” in the sense that it seems to take Victorianism into a technological future, where maybe races and sexes would have become more integrated, as with the technology, and therefore the racist elements of Victorian culture would have been grown past in a more utopian idea of Victorianism.

  9. SR wrote:

    As a south Asian, I have a problem with people harboring nostalgia for the Victorian area and the ill-gained wealth synonymous with that era.

    There are great opportunities to redefine steampunk into a more POC inclusive genre.
    There are examples that arn’t well known such as Captain Nemo (originally a south Asian) and Mechanicles from the Alladin TV series, which interpret as an analogy to the body of Greek knowledge preserved in Asia during the middle ages.

  10. Margaret Killjoy wrote:

    I think this kind of critical thinking about steampunk is incredibly important, and I’d love to communicate with the author about including it, or something related, in SteamPunk Magazine.

  11. RJG wrote:

    Love the essay, but I must strongly oppose the claim that Wild Wild West was a bad movie.

  12. Caitiecat wrote:

    Fascinating article, and will be very helpful to me. I’m currently working as a writer and linguist on a MMORPG in the steampunk vein: I’m going to make a solid effort to make sure that the world we’re building isn’t whitewashed. Thanks for the heads-up, and sorry for needing the reminder-poke.

  13. Arturo wrote:

    When I think of Wild Wild West, I’ll always remember the moment when Branaugh’s “evil plan” was revealed – part of it involved returning California and Texas to Mexican control. Myself and 3/4 of the audience cheered. Sorry, Will.

    Anyway, as someone who’s dabbled in goth clubs and occasionally hangs out with steampunkers, I don’t think I ever could deal with the default fashion stylings for both subcultures being so Euro-centric. I’ve always thought the idea of a Dark Charro outfit, to cite an example from my own native culture, would be a hell of a curveball to throw at the crowd. And F them if they don’t like the hat.

  14. cocolamala wrote:

    i like steampunk anime and fiction because of the technology (crank operated flashlights!?) and the idea of bringing modernity to people 1-2 generations earlier. i enjoy the “money shots” in steampunk anime where the huge monstrous “airship” rises above a pokey rural town and townspeople experience the present as both the past and the future simultaneously.

    i don’t get into the dress-up aspects becuase that wanders too close to fetishising the colonial experience, and makes me wonder who I would have been at that time.

    (prolly not wearing a whalebone corset and drinking tea with a bunch of engineers).

    true to life victorian-era dress-up for my southern agrarian/coal mining roots probably wasn’t gibson girl attire (maybe a little bit though, for special occassions ; )

    anyway, in victorian england, the explorers were going off to conquer and exploit ppl who looked like me, doing their best to exclude folk like me from the whole mission of exploration and conquest and enrichment.

    back then, i probably would have been protesting (or at least disagreed with) these explorers and their colonial efforts, rather than going to parties and marvelling at their machines.

    i hear you on the alternate visions issue though, but i would note this. science fiction was an outgrowth of the colonial experience (translated metaphorically). sci-fi narratives express a fictionalized colonialism. however, those stories don’t have to always serve or promote colonialism, they can be approached non-traditionally from the perspective of the alien (the OTHER), or in light of alien victory (flipping the role of the colonizer and colonized), or in the ways you detailed above, and those types of sci-fi stories critique the colonial experience rather than serve it up unexamined.

    so, to more fully participate in steampunk culture, there needs to be space for the experiences and history of POC in the Victorian era on both sides of the colonial experience. And in a creative way, NOT in a way that simply reproduces the classist and racist structures of that time. There needs to be respectful inclusion of roles/ characters I would enjoy taking on.

    also, can i fully participate in the aesthetics of goth culture if i am not pale? hanging out in clubs with my gothier friends, i knew that the pale skin, robert smith hair, red lipstick thing, just wasn’t convincing on me.

  15. jvansteppes wrote:

    I’m not too familiar with this genre, but Philip Pullman’s Golden Compass certainly comes to mind as fitting a steampunk aesthetic. I had really looked forward to reading that series but found that its romanticization of implicitly racialized ‘exploration’ and construction of sci-fi ethnicities left me feeling really uneasy, as did the fetishistic portrayal of Victorianish Great Britain.

  16. sandeep wrote:

    firstly i applaud you for pointing me to racefail, to which i was previously unaware. interesting stuff. i’ll have to do more reading on that later.

    one the one hand i feel like this article isn’t relevant to me as i’ve participated in steampunk-esque stuff in the past year without feeling a shred of anything regarding my or the other participants race – it seems to be a pattern for me, whereas some things really can be color free for me. but on the other hand i find this article insightful and thought provoking, compelling because it tackles a sungenre that a little less than a year ago i myself stumbled upon through artistic outlets, in a natural way, and have since come to enjoy and be in awe of. certainly compelled to participate within.

    “While steampunk spaces are admittedly very “white”, the beautiful thing is that it doesn’t have to be that way. ”

    it could be argued most everything is ideologically raceless, that it only appears to be “raced up” by the homogeneity of the contributors. but perhaps that may be an error on the outside non-involved and observing “other” race. truth is fear of racism goes a long way and people tend to suspect racism before perhaps investigating for it in many instances.

    but generally, i like your tone in this article. you’ve got the excitement that looks like you’ve managed to work through any fears and mitigating factors that’d previously barred you in your mind from participating and now you see it for what it is a wonderful artform within which self expressive possibilities abound. this’s the same joy arguably a musician feels or author when starting with page one of a book line one of a song etc. and im glad you feel you can now participate in that great human tradition known as creativety in the outlet of your choice. i identify alot with what youre saying, whilst many of hte spific moments of race realization such as where you think to yourself steampunk is white, i never did make that leap, you could perhaps say i wasnt hip to it, or perhaps it never really was there, or perhaps i had already got what i needed in my mind to overcome whatever pitfalls might’ve taken me to that place of thought. either way, steampunk being talked about whilst taking into account race is very exiting and current and i’m pleased and excited to see the topic appear in such a framed discussion. thanks for that. perhaps this is what bridging a gap feels like.

  17. Ariel wrote:

    Thank you for sharing your perspective on this – as a white steampunk enthusiast, the culture’s homogenity has frequently struck me.

    I am glad that you have not had any experiences of overt exclusion thus far, but since that should be (but rarely is) a bare minimum, i wonder what could be done to openly mark the culture as inclusive. The NYT article, showcasing PoC in steampunk was excellent….. but how can we showcase diversity, and encourage more, without it devolving into Tokenism?

    Or, is participation in such an aesthetically and revisionistically motivated subculture inherently the province of a main-culture dominant enough to have the leisure time to pursue it? Can marginalized groups preserve their agency within a counter culture, without enjoying the benefits of equality in mainstream?

  18. cocolamala wrote:

    @Ariel, et all,

    i think research and storytelling are ways to be more inclusive. look into the stories of young women who were suffragettes and abolitionists, and other activists of the time to provide great “role” models for characters and cosplayers.

    POC cosplayers could base a character around Bessie Coleman, the first black female pilot to receive an international pilot’s license.

    Chester Himes wrote black dective fiction, set in Harlem, in the early 20th c. His settings and stories are material to munch on for poc steampunk era experiences.

    you could tell a steampunk story about black women doing anti-lynching activism in the South, like Mary Church Terrell or Ida B. Wells (acting as steampunk dectives, or steampunk assisted activism, or something)

    it’s just a lack of knowledge about what black folk and other people of color were actually doing back then, besides being faceless (or stereotypical) victims of oppression and colonialism

  19. cocolamala wrote:

    there were also black ppl running alternative newspapers (media) back in the day. there was a black victorian era community, it’s goals though, may not have lined up with the white victorian era colonial goals.

    marcus garvey, would also be an interesting character basis for steampunk. he had ships, he was interested in sailing off to distant lands…but, to accomplish different goals than colonialism (or was he?)

  20. cocolamala wrote:

    I noticed that the historican figures I cited above mostly come from the early 20th c. Right after the Victorian Era. But I think that slip in time is forgivable, since the Victorian era (1837-1901) was a prime time for slavery.

    It was all over the Americas, and all over the Carribean at that time. Is it any wonder POC don’t regard the Empire with wistful nostalgia, and may be reluctant to participate in pretending to be back in that era?

    Additionally, Oscar Wilde, mentioned above, was sentenced to 2 years hard labor for being gay during the Victorian era. If that witty, zingy writer were alive today, what do you think he’d say about Victorian era nostalgia? Do you think he’d want to trade his freedom to go back in time for the fashion?

  21. Zoe wrote:

    As a POC who loves Steampunk, I will say that while there are certainly a lot of folks who have some sort of aristocratic or military persona for themselves in the subculture, I wouldn’t say that overly romanticizing or glossing over the horrors of the Victorian era is so rampant as one might fear. It really seems to me that for every explorer or lord of the nobility, there is a factory worker or an anarchist. Like someone else said, class consciousness is a big part of Steampunk, and you only have to read issue 1 of Steampunk Magazine to realize that radical politics finds an easy place in the subculture. I don’t think Steampunk is necessarily about romanticizing imperialism, thought that does happen. I think the driving concept behind it is the idea that, as Philip K. Dick said, “The Empire never ended.” People find a Victorian universe thrilling because, subconsciously, they see that there are mythic parallels between that era and ours. Imperialism and the subjugation of the Other is still rampant, while technological progress is moving at the speed of light. Without getting too deep here, I think people are simply inspired by the narrative of struggle, discovery, and cultural upheaval. Yet another person said that Oscar Wilde probably wouldn’t want to go back to that era if he had the chance, but I think that kind of misses the point and glosses over the significance of his life. To me, that’s akin to asking if Malcom X wouldn’t have wanted to live in the 60s. What the hell, you know?

    That said, I think it’s true that Steampunk could greatly benefit from more non-Anglo narratives. But you only have to do a little bit of research to find out what totally awesome and adventurous things people from your own culture were doing in that time. Chinese-American factory workers, Puerto Ricans revolting against the Spanish crown, black Daughters of Bilitis. And you know, I’d really like to see a Steampunk Abolitionist one of these days! That would be really interesting…

    So yeah. There’s definitely room for innovations like these, and they can be easily made.

  22. Jha wrote:

    Hello everyone! Thanks for all your comments! I’ll endeavour to respond to everybody the best I can. If I can’t, perhaps I may have addressed it over at my blog, or you can e-mail me.

    B @ 1: Most of what I’ve seen of the subculture is about the Oh Shiney factor, the machines, the grittiness of the time. Some certainly does address class. I suggest checking out steampunkdebate for more. I like the Oh Shiney factor myself.

    Tiara @ 2: Considering this is this essay’s debut, I am hard-pressed to decide what steampunkland’s reaction is.

    Deena @ 3: That was my initial experience with it too! I came to the conclusion, though, that the execution of the idea is up to the participants which is why addressing race (et al) in the subculture is so important! It’s such a fun subculture, it deserves more =)

    Persia @ 4: My love leans towards Visions of Escaflowne, although it’s more gaslamp fantasy.

    Pickly @ 5: Yes, cultures do evolve through contact with other cultures. Nevertheless, we have the luxury in this day and age to ask, “do I really want my culture to change as a result of imposition from another dominant, invading culture?” Which I think is a pertinent question, and why the issue of cultural appropriation is so rife and unsettling.

    And yes, certainly steampunk has its doors open to rules that will tighten up expectations on what is steampunk, what is not. My re-imagining the past isn’t so much a challenge to whether it is steampunk, but more of a way to inform myself how the world could be like. I never re-imagined Asia to take center-stage when growing up, tbh.

    ghettoManga @ 7: Well now, Zulu Mech is definitely someting I shall be keeping an eye out for. Thanks for the tip-off!

    Margaret Killjoy @ 10: I’d be honoured =) Ay-leen the Peacemaker, who I hold in high esteem (and who beta-read this for me, as well as introduced me to your magazine, and much much more) is currently working on an essay on colonialism. I daresay that that would make a better addition to your magazine than my primer essay here! She has a very interesting essay on Orientalism, which was another response to RaceFail from a steampunk’s pespective. It was reading that essay which made me realize I wasn’t the only one asking such questions. We are both hoping more steampunks of colour come out and speak about their steampunk experience.

    RJG @ 11: We shall have to agree to disagree. Wild Wild West was fun, I won’t deny that (and Will Smith was handsome in those clothes!) but it still fell flat :P Call me a snob if you will!

    cocolamala @ 14: Steampunk, fortunately, isn’t about going back to the past! XD In the Victorian era I would probably be one of those Malayans plotting to kill the British Residents. The colonialism in scifi, I think, has been well-noted in RaceFail. Participating in a counter-culture should encourage us to challenge the status quo, rather than reinforce it.

    I hear ya on the goth culture question though.

    @ 20: Oscar Wilde wrote some very interesting things as a result of his incarceration. I believe in De Profoundis he writes that being in prison truly opened his eyes. If he were alive today, he would most certainly be a steampunk! He would probably say, take their most beautiful clothing and tastes, but leave behind the ugliness. He was a very strong proponent for beauty, of all kinds, in garb and behaviour.

    sandeep @ 16: Certainly, many people fear being racial because they fear the accusation of racism. But race (and culture) plays a huge part in shaping identities, so ignoring them isn’t the way to go either. The joys of creation can be heightened by a sensitivity to such issues. I didn’t use to be so aware of it either, but when I was, it was like the world opened up. I think, too often, we’re ask to deny this racial part of ourselves, so as to not disrupt the illusion of “one human race”. It’s a nice idea, but too often, poorly executed.

    Ariel @ 17: Those are great questions, and I assure you, a lot of steampunks are working on that. This essay is just a primer, and I’m at that point of “Yay diversity! ….. now what?” I think in order to answer the question of “how”, steampunks of colour have to step up to experiment with various ways of engaging with the space. Like cocolamala suggested, writing is a great way of working inclusivity into the genre. Caitiecat @ 12 mentions yet another venue which could use more inclusivity. So many ways to engage, so many opportunities! We’ll fuck up along the way but at the very least, no one should fault us for not trying.

    Zoe @ 21: Certainly not all steampunks are about romanticizing imperialism, just as not all steampunks are about the machinery, and so on, so forth. (I’m definitely one of those in for the social scifi aspect of it.) But the problem is there, and I think it would be re-miss to not address it.

  23. Titanis walleri wrote:

    Is that a Skies of Arcadia screenshot?

  24. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @Titanis Walleri –

    *grins* Jha said it was cool because they were sky pirates, and that works with the aesthetic.

  25. Jha wrote:

    @ Latoya: Sky pirates are awesome!

    Speaking of sky pirates, and intersections with race, and ways to build up inclusivity, here’s a discussion at Fen At SEA on creating a meta-setting that can be used for gaming or fics or whatever called Steampunk Nusantara which focuses on the Malayan archipelago and beyond. Since I’m easily confused by such discussions, the only thing I actually got from it was “beam parangs” and my brain kinda stopped working from that point on. It is, however, a very solid example of PoC getting together to work on something that centers on their experiences. I’m sure there’re other such examples elsewhere.

  26. DivergentDana wrote:

    “I’m interested in steampunk (as in, I often enjoy looking, but I’m not brass-ing out my laptop anytime soon) and have been thinking a lot about how/why I don’t have the same depth of anxiety and conflict in relation to it as a PoC as I do with, say, Goth culture or some of its other close-cousins in edited nostalgia.”

    If it weren’t off topic, I’d ask you to expound upon that, because in retrospect, I do wonder about the wide proliferation of things like bellydancing, tribal/kanji tattoos, dreadlocks, etc. alongside the “edited nostalgia” in the Gothic subculture, in light of its largely white following. Is it the updated version of the Victorian aesthetic and its curio cabinets full of “sacred and profane” objects from all over the world displayed as a testament to the owner’s wealth, adventurousness, and education with implications of colonial dominance? I dunno. :) Also, I wonder about possibly being a double appropriator when it comes to things like Elegant Gothic Lolita, which is somewhere between goth and steampunk, where there’s a hyperfocus on the morbid Victorian aesthetic. It’s European culture filtered through Japanese culture, and I don’t know how to involve myself in it without seeming like/being an A-hole.

    “also, can i fully participate in the aesthetics of goth culture if i am not pale? hanging out in clubs with my gothier friends, i knew that the pale skin, robert smith hair, red lipstick thing, just wasn’t convincing on me.”

    It’s definitely doable. I’m brown-skinned, and there was no mistaking me for anything else, fashion-wise. Then again, my more stereotypical style may have helped. I was less Robert Smith and more Amy Lee — except with less fashion fail. Now the fact that the ideal woman in the community is alabaster-skinned and a size 2 was a buzzkill, but for me, it didn’t seem much different from not being the mainstream beauty ideal. You’ve just got to use a darker cosmetic palette, is all — my “red” lipsticks are in the brick to merlot range.

    And an obligatory “Oooh, shiny”, regarding the computer.

  27. Stephen H. Segal wrote:

    Outstanding, thought-provoking essay. Jha, can I convince you to drop me a line directly? Via segal at weirdtales dot net.

  28. sandeep wrote:

    i will throw out one more hting, that im not liking the emerging idea amongst some of the comments that a person is more or less kept to playing roles of his or her own color. to me this is a bit limiting and also a but unreastic, as you could call this a form of acting, and actors of all types play roles perhaps originally written for a certain look. the gist gets across and the race becomes a non issue. i’d just like to emphasize that if i as a brown-skinned guy with grandparents from the punjab chose to play an english aristocrat, be it historically accurate or not, i’d hope i wouldn’t find myself at odds with my fellow steampunk-ers, that noone would question the historical accuracy and therefore the legitimacy of my getup. i haven’t gotten that vibe as i’ve said from any of those i’ve come across, but it’s an attitute i’m starting to pick up on here. if the word fantasy is intended to describe what we’re doing here, then i would say anything your imagination can throw together is fair game, be that a brown skinned aristocrat or not. for some of us, the thought of being historically accurate more or less means playing less appealing roles, because lets face it, the world wasnt as equal a place in the victorian era. my skin and ancestry would have probably found me in a situation far worse than what i’d hope for in modern times. perhaps farming, given the punjab region, but thats not very excited. as a creative person, i should be left alone to my own whim as to what occupation, background, and place i would hold in my alternauniverse of steampunk-ness. just had to get that off my chest. skin doesn’t matter and shouldn’t define how freely we pick our steampunk characters. history be damned, excersize that 21st century freedom. be whatever the hell you want. it’s still steampunk. at least in my book.

  29. karak wrote:

    I love steampunk–I wandered into it from my Pirate Lolita look (and Lolita has some of the weirdest racial dynamics of any subculture I can think of).

    Part of the Victorian era, I feel, was the appropriation of “foreign” things into their lives. I believe, if you wished, you could incorporate elements of Malayasian culture and fashion into your look, and still be steampunk. I, fact, I think that would look bitchin’ awesome.

    That said, this is a wonderful, well written and well thought out essay, by One Who Knows, and I think I’ll send it on to some of my steampunky friends.

  30. Adrianna wrote:

    Great aessay!! I LoveeeeeeeeeeeeeVisions of Escaflowne . I will defenitly be exploring more steampunk stuff.

  31. Jared wrote:

    There may be lots of PoC interested in something like steampunk. But when they show up to an event and only see a mass of ‘white’ people, they get put off (for what ever reasons) and don’t show up again. And so the next PoC to show up does the same thing and so if they all showed up at once, there may be allot more PoC interested than what there appears to be.

  32. Elusis wrote:

    China Mieville is a writer who really leans hard on the “punk” part of steampunk – he’s run for public office as a socialist, and his books often involve themes about how power and wealth are built through exploitation of the working classes and minority groups. So, not all “steampunk” is about a rosy nostalgia for Victoriana – I personally like it much rougher around the edges, with its critical and political sensibilities intact.

  33. Jess wrote:

    Jha, I loved this piece.

    Have you read China Mieville? There’s someone who takes a lot of “Victorian” narrative and turns it on its ear. The Iron Council especially, is one of the better treatments of workers I have read in a long time, and I’d call it required reading for any spec fic fan who doesn’t want to slog through C Wright Mills or s utterly unfamiliar with labor struggles.

    You mentioned the issue of appropriation and one person asked the very question I always do: where do the lines get drawn? To me, the whole question seems to be taking on the very same assumptions that a lot of right-wing nativists do– that your genes entitle you (or not) to taking part in culture A or culture B and nothing else, and that those same genes — your skin color, or whatever, compel you to behave in a certain way. Essentializing that kind of stuff always seemed to me to be a weird road to get on.

    There’s a kind of Heisenberg principle involved in any cultural interaction. I mean, no culture is only itself, some kind of pure ur-culture free from outside influence. Whenever a white supremacist talks about pure English culture I laugh and ask him what the Normans thought.

    Which brings us to steampunk. To me, it seems that the whole point is to imagine the effect of an alternate technological and cultural pathway, and one that does leave a lot of room for PoC — as you noted, there’s the idea of Japan or China having the kind of cultural influence that the US does today, or at least competing on more of an equal footing (although I’d argue that in the modern world they do).

    In one sense, the nostalgia isn’t for the Victorian era except for the technology. The real nostalgia is for a time when many cultures interacted on an equal footing — say the 16th century, when the Turks, for instance, and North Africans, were powers to be reckoned with. Or maybe a better way to put it is that we try to imagine a time when the world was less homogenized, when there were places to go that one could discover something in a blank space on the map.

    Also, the idea that many of the interactions that marked British colonialism might have happened in a better way. Yes, there was slavery, oppression, and all that stuff in the 19th century. But steampunk, to me, offers a way to imagine an alternative. Isn’t that the point? You brought up as a re-imagining of Asia viz. the west and it seems to me that imagining that alternative is important to crafting alternatives in the real world.

  34. A.D. Nix wrote:

    @ DivergentDana
    It’s some of those things (and a few others!) plus the absolute centrality of pallor in acceptable in-group presentation. It may not be a requirement but, the fact that paleness is included in the de facto apotheosis of the dominant Goth aesthetic is too hard to overlook.

    It doesn’t look like Steampunk is going to go this particular route (God/Steampunks of Color willing) and the fact that the Times managed to run the image above for a Steampunk article rather than a . . . “Bleampunk” article (or whatever moniker they’d choose for this round of ‘Look, Blacks Doing Something You Didn’t Think They Would!’ – see: “Blipster” aka ‘Black Hipster’ coverage) feels like a good sign.

  35. cocolamala wrote:

    on appropriation:

    cultural appropriation is not just representing another culture, but doing it in ways that eclipse the original authors. that, i think, marks the “theft” aspect of cultural appropriation.

    in steampunk/loli-goth culture: there is little sign that is happening.

    on essentialism and race in roleplaying/cosplay:

    i don’t think your roles/characters are limited by race or history. there is totally room for creativity there.

    but i have heard/read black cosplayers lamenting the fact that there are few characters of color for them to emulate, but when they dress as white characters, no one recognizes who they’re supposed to be.

    when the aesthetics interfere with fully including/integrating poc, that gets my goat.

  36. Eunice wrote:

    Ooh, niiice! I’ve been waiting for a PoC/steampunk article for a long time. As a very amateur mangaka, I’ve been working on a story where mecha and steampunk unite. And one of the central storylines deals with two women from Igboland in a neo-Biafran war.

    My dad fought in the Biafran war (still won’t tell me what side, though), so he’s my first reference.

    The hard part is that this is an alternate reality, which means that Nigeria and all other British colonies are not named. Still working on it…

  37. Jolantru wrote:

    Thank you, Jha!

    I am interested in steampunk, though I am not fully into it yet – given my time constraints and family obligations. ;)

    I have written and wondered about POC in steampunk (I am Chinese-Singaporean) as well. For a while, I was quite uncomfortable with the Victorian aspect of steampunk and I did voice it out in the LJ community ’steampunkdebate’. For me, it’s not just the costuming or the culture, but the history as well (I am a trained historian and history *is* important). I have been told that history does not matter… which annoys me to no end.

    My vision of myself as a POC steampunker will be along the lines of 13th Aunt in Once Upon A Time In China. 13th Aunt is played by Rosamund Kwan: she portrays a vivacious blue-stocking who does photography and is not afraid to cross gender roles in the (fictional) 19th century.

    I think there are many POC steampunkers out there. ;)

  38. cocolamala wrote:

    can anyone provide links to the discussions of poc and steampunk?

    i’d like to read the debates about romanticising colonialism in steampunk. i found some of the poc steampunk pages, but it’s hard to find the comment threads.

    was there a discussion of colonialism in sci-fi on livejournal? or was that already accepted wisdom?

    the livejournal FEN of color community page is still active.

  39. Cory Gross wrote:

    Thank you for the interesting essay!

    Despite having written for Steampunk Magazine and writing an extended history of Steampunk, I don’t consider myself a Steampunk. However, that doesn’t absolve my interest in the Victorian-Edwardian Era and Scientific Romances from race-related scrutiny.

    One of the things I’m very conscious of is that what I choose to discuss on my weblog is motivated by my own fields of interest and values, which happen to be those of a literally Anglo-Saxon, male, lower-middle class Canadian. That is amplified by the content itself, which good or bad simply DOES come primarily from a Euro-American perspective. Jules Verne, H.G. Wells, Edward Ellis, Rudyard Kipling, and Mark Twain were all white men. The adventure films of the 1930’s came out of Hollywood. Even the class consciousness of modern “Steampunk” writing develops out of certain racial assumptions or priorities. The only other major tradition of Scientific Romances I’m aware of is Japanese, though I’m not sure of the extent to which that should be dismissed.

    What that all means for me is an inescapable fact that the genre is a Western, Euro-American self-examination. I recognize that I will always be gazing upon the Other when I’m not looking at myself, no matter how much of a Japanophile I am or how many Native Studies courses I took in university. The benefit of that, however, is the recognition that the fiction is itself a Euro-American narrative and not an accurate reflection on the experience of people of colour. It opens up space for being self-critical while encouraging authentic learning (eg: reading books on First Nations culture and history written by First Nations peoples, currently finishing up Orientalism by Edward Said).

    In the mean time, in my own attempts at writing frontier fiction, I try to mitigate issues of appropriation by researching as well as I can, being positive (without abnormally sunny) about the cultures I’m including, and never presuming to get into the head of my First Nations characters. All I can say is that I’m being conscious of it and hope I don’t egregious offend anybody when and if it gets published.

    There is plenty of room for tales from the other side though, and I would love to see them. Having Native American voice actors in the animated Turok is one thing; to have a story about Native Americans and dinosaurs actually written by a Native American would be marvellous. A story of the Underground Railroad that actually is an underground railroad? This is also a lot of what makes reading and watching Japanese Scientific Romances so fascinating… It’s not only their own experience, but their gaze on the Other of Western society.

    Anyways, thanks again for this provocative piece!

  40. Jha wrote:

    Stephen H Segal @ 27: Thanks! You’ll be hearing from me soon =)

    sandeep @ 28: It’s fortunate for those of us who don’t feel any racial limitations upon ourselves whenever we participate. However, we’re not other people, who feel very keenly the effects of their upbringing and culture. Sometimes, it’s just a case of wanting role models, and not having the confidence / ability to simply create a persona. Other factors may play in: a desire to be historically accurate while subverting it, wanting to use artefacts from cultures other than our own without subsuming our identities or being disrespectful to others. There’s also the huge factor: in today’s world, we are still not equal. We want to be, but the mainstream culture still affects our attitudes. To say “ignore skin colour” is disingenuous at best, ignorant at worst.

    karak @ 29: Malaysian culture is much like American culture – a sense of “culture? What?” It’s got its variations, but it’s very hard to pin down Malaysian culture =)

    Jared @ 31: Definitely. It’s very important that some intrepid steampunks of colour show up and forge the subculture into something more inclusive =)

    Elusis @ 32: Not all steampunks are attracted to steampunk for the same reason. Perhaps I didn’t make it clear that this is the case, but there is always going to be a vein which idealizes the past.

    Jess @ 33: I have yet to read his works, unfortunately. There’s a lot I have to read. And the Internet is also vast! XD There are very subtle current running underneath that question of cultural appropriation. It’s a conversation that this part of steampunk should participate in, though, especially when dealing with non-dominant cultures today. Like I said above, we know that culture shifts and changes, but often because some other power is causing it, not the people themselves. If we truly believe in the ideal of racial equality, then it is utterly necessary to look at who’s a who, or who’s a what, who controls the mainstream, who has change forced on them.

    Now, the idea that there is a “whole point of steampunk”…. :P I’m gonna have to dispute that. Steampunk doesn’t have a point. It is comprised of many participants, all for whom steampunk represents different things. For me, participating in this space? It’s definitely not a nostalgia for a time when I could explore the blank space on the map – on the consciousness of many today, I belong to that blank space on the map: plenty of people still ask me, “where’s Malaysia?” My point in participating is to draw that topography on that blank space and make sure nobody forgets it’s there.

    cocolamala @ 35: Hear hear! Although whether cultural appropriation / exclusion will happen in steampunk… that’s up to the steampunks.

    @ 38: Colonialism is one of those “we kinda know it’s there but we don’t wanna have an extended conversation about it” things. However, my friend Ay-Leen is working on an essay addressing that very subject =)

    Eunice @ 36: That sounds exciting! I only learnt about the Biafran war last year =) Good luck with it – and yes, it’s definitely difficult wondering what to name a space that wouldn’t have its current name due to colonialism. I’m more fortunate in this case ^^

  41. Jess wrote:

    @cocomala — i get what you are going for there, but then that raises a whole lot of other questions.

    There are plenty of examples of “indigenous” culture that are borrowed or taken from elsewhere. Buddhism isn’t native to Tibet any more than it is to China, and Christianity is not really native to Europe, strictly speaking. But it isn’t like either group acknowledges India or the Middle East much.

    This is not to say, for instance, that New Age whackos populating the southwest doing “peyote” rituals and carrying around crystals isn’t problematic. But to me it’s just wrong because it’s stupid. I mean, I can’t get too het up that Madonna likes Kabbalah because even though it’s “my” culture, because I can’t take her seriously when she talks about it.

    But it’s just as wrong to assume that when people pick up stuff from other cultures that it can’t be made into something new, and sometimes different, but still valuable. And that doesn’t take anything away from the originals, not at all. Indian spirituality isn’t less so because a bunch of Americans decided to take up with the ISKCon and sing Hare Hare in an airport.

    I guess it gets me because my own family is made up of many cultures, from across the spectrum of oppressed/oppressor (and it would really depend on what year of the 20th century you picked to decide who went in what category) and at least two different racial groups. And when your ancestors lived at a major crossroads, then the whole question of whose cultural “stuff” is whose gets a little tangled.

    And that’s part of what steampunk is about. Which might be why the cosmopolitan part of empire/steampunk– Victorian or otherwise — appeals to many people. I mean, why live in New York, or Rio, or Tokyo otherwise? The whole reason I live in NYC is that mixing of peoples, languages and cultures that by itself produces a fascinating result. Steampunk — especially Mieville and Moore’s work, I think — brings that out. (Or does if done right).

  42. E. McClendon Walker wrote:

    This is an excellent article of academic quality which will likely end up in the archives of steampunk history as it develops.

    I am a woman of color and I consider myself part of the steampunk movement, though my interest in it lies more in its broader possibilities for social change than its visual aesthetic (though I like aspects of that as well). The idea of taking influence from the past, gleaning the best practices and incorporating them into the present is highly relevant today. We know our current culture (Western capitalist culture) is unsustainable, and we need to come up with sound alternatives rather urgently. The steady growth in popularity of steampunk, in my view, signals a broad shift in focus from a myopic view of history to a much wider one, taking influence from varying cultures and points of history. This is what we need to be doing, frankly. We need to evolve, and steampunk offers a prospective avenue for doing so. Plenty of people are doing this in their own way; that’s the punk aspect of it.

    Maybe the Victorian era is so compelling as a source of inspiration because it was the beginning of the way of life we know today: an almost worshipful adoration of the latest technology, a sense of unlimited expansion and growth, increasing globalization, raging capitalism, and so forth. It makes sense now to look back at this era and at this culture in particular because it was the epicenter of late 19th and early 20th century modernity. The sun never set on Victoria’s empire, right?

    Today we have the luxuries of even better technology, better communication, better living standards, and much more. But we’ve also largely traded away the values of artisanship, sense of decorum and emphasis on natural beauty so associated with that time. Capturing those things via steampunk is not so much about nostalgia, but about taking best cultural values and practices and leaving the rest in the past.

    I’m involved in steampunk because I wish to shape it. I want it to be inclusive so I’m including myself, and anyone else who wants in. I want to be part of the process of creating something new out of something old and forgotten, which in my view is what steampunk is about, at its core.

    As you see I can go on and on about this all night but I wanted to share some of my thoughts about this topic, since it’s rather close to me.

  43. karak wrote:

    Jha@40 of course your are right. There is no more a monolith of Malaysian culture than there is of American culture. I apologize.

  44. nyarlathotep wrote:

    Wow, hey, thanks for linking to the conversation I started on Steampunk Nusantara; it began its life initially as something not quite exactly steampunk (the initial source of the idea called it “electropunk”, but no-one’s ever made that term popular), but it looks like it’d move to that direction, if ever I could get everything written down.

    I’ve only just discovered that steampunk could also be considered an aesthetic movement, can you believe that? So the possibility that it could get “Hot Topic”-ed never even did cross my mind. You mean there are people who are living the lifestyle, the way the goths and the punks did? Good gracious, wow. I didn’t know. I mean, I saw people working on projects like that, but it never crossed my mind that it was possible, you know?

    Even then, my concerns for steampunk have always been from the perspective of someone who came to it from the literature geek side, and from exposure from video games (Black Isle’s Arcanum: of Steamworks and Magick Obscura). Steampunk has always been a mode of writing, a sub-genre of science fiction and fantasy.

    And of course, it’s not news that in media that is (until recently, perhaps) so dominated by white authors and personalities, yes, steampunk is in danger of falling into the pit of RaceFail.

    Just for a bit of background; I never started Steampunk Nusantara by thinking that “this work shall be steampunk”. Like any good gamer fanboy, I started by reading scandalous amounts of gaming sourcebooks and stealing as much ideas as I could for my Someday Perfect pen-and-paper roleplaying game campaign. Said campaign never materialized, so I ended up with several long discussions of it online with fellow gaming nerds, and then a whole bunch of written fragments… and nothing else really apart from ideas floating in my head, up until recently.

    Thing was, the primary goal of such a setting, or vision, was not really an attempt at nostalgia for a time really best forgotten (yep, I actually dislike the Victorian era and attempts to romanticize it), but as a way to go back, take those horrible moments of history where people like me were seen as less than human because of some weird accident of birth, and then make it Not Suck Any More.

    It is in some way a way to recolonize that past, and get past that huge chip on the shoulder I manifests when I encounter white (or even Western) privilege, or artifacts of my own Malay privilege and racism, and stereotypes about the “lazy, laidback Malay” — a stereotype that, if historians like Farish Noor are right, are artifacts from the old British divide-and-conquer tactic they employed on their “inferiors”.

    What would have happened had the Chinese remained an imperialist force? What if the vision of Akbar’s India remained? What if the Islamic caliphate was… better, somehow? How would you make these visions possible? What would it be like, to be living in an entreport smack dab in the middle of all of that, and trying to make a living by bilking everyone and occasionally resorting to piracy? What if you had the technology to move it forward? Not only the technology, but what if your beliefs and magic were true, and your skin really did repel bullets? Would there be a price for that?

    So, yes. I suppose steampunk, or at least my vision of it, is a vision of the past, deconstructed and reconstructed and brought back to some kind of contemporary context. But it’s not about some kind of Victorian Empire that never set. And if there are other steampunk– er, steampunk fans who dislike that?

    Well, what a shame. Too bad.

  45. cocolamala wrote:

    hi Jess,

    i think that sharing and borrowing between cultures is fine. but i object to not giving credit where credit is due. the example of christianity in europe is one of sharing, not appropriation — because the bible retains info about who the original christians were. appropriating christianity would be like rewriting the book so the main events took place in paris. i don’t know enough about buddhism in tibet/india though, to comment about that.

  46. SJ wrote:

    Great piece.

    I feel like a good steampunk world isn’t about romanticizing a bygone era…that’s boring. I think the fun is in exploring the heavy contrast between its aims and its realities.

    On the one hand, Victorian England is precious, genteel, gorgeous, and aspires to much. On the other hand, it has a teeming, stinking underbelly of colonialism, oppression, classism, sexism, rampant drug use, and *violent* crime. An underbelly it can’t exist without. That is just plain good story fodder. It worked for Jekyll and Hyde, it worked for From Hell, and it’s still working now.

    I think what gets people into dark twists on Victorian England isn’t “Oh, for the good old days!” but a real awareness that it was a hypocritical, dark, dangerous time.

    I’d love to see a good steampunk tale that explores the tarnished underclass: “antisocial women”, displaced peoples from colonized nations, destitute factory workers, common criminals, all fantastically clothed and housed and gadgeted and kicking ass and going on adventures.

  47. Jha wrote:

    Cory Gross @ 39: I sympathize with your troubles of always looking at the Other. Which I think is why we need to focus on bring these Other’ed voices to the forefront – so that we can start building a world in which these Other voices won’t be so … Other, anymore. There will always be a bit of foreignness, I think, in the ways we approach literature that doesn’t always match with what we grew up with (for example, reading Tolkien when I was a child was definitely a foreign experience, but since that was the default kind of literature we got, it wasn’t exactly an Other), but foreignity doesn’t always have to be Other’d and exoticized to the extent that it is now.

    Jess @ 41: Cultural appropriation is a tough one, for third-culture kids and for transplanted descendants like myself. And you know what, it does totally suck. I firmly believe, though, that we should be envisioning a place where these multiple heritages add to us, rather than tear us apart inside while we question our right to cultural artefacts! Which is why we should be talking about cultural appropriation, whether in the steampunk context or outside. Racialicious has an open thread on it somewhere. No conclusions are forthcoming. Which obviously means we need to hash it out some more.

    E. McClendon Walker @ 42: I’m very glad you feel the same way! And I can’t help but feel you bring up several very important points about the appeal of steampunk. I would have addressed them in my essay, but they’re not exactly PoC-specific. Nonetheless, important points. I hope to hear more from you sometime =)

    karak @ 43: No apology needed! It is, personally, quite the occasional source of entertainment for myself! ^^

    nyarlathotep @ 44: We’re not in RaceFail yet! And yes, funny how such a relatively small subculture has so many strange little pockets! I really enjoyed the Steampunk Nusantara conversation because… well, because it took me home, so to speak, and it really de-centered my North American experience, in what I think is a pleasant (though unsettling) way. I think I need to write more on this de-centering. Don’t feel too bad about the campaign setting not coming to fruition – perhaps you just didn’t have the resources, or maybe you’ll have better luck in the future. It’s a great idea, and I hope you keep plugging on!

    SJ @ 46: Well, I like the genteel society myself, to be honest. The idea of hosting literary salons and just sitting around intellectuals like during that age is remarkable and I would really like to try hosting such a party someday.

    So glad everyone’s liking this piece! If you’d like more SoC goodness, Ay-Leen has posted an essay examining colonialism in Steampunk. We are both looking into starting a space specifically for those who identify as steampunks and persons of colour (whether or not you feel at odds with the more mainstream subculture) so we can find a space for SoC solidarity and hopefully encourage more cultural diversity and promote incluvisity in steampunk. If you’re interested, feel free to get in touch with me: jhameia.goh@gmail.com

    (Also on a completely different note, I’m hosting the 3rd Asian Women Blog Carnival, and would be delighted to see some of your voices there.)

  48. JW wrote:

    A descendant of rich, powerful, educated white men’s response:

    I think the most fantastic thing about Steampunk is the fact that is a malleable re-versioning of the past. Just as the Steampunk lady’s choice to eschew corsets in favour of trousers speaks of a silent retrofitting of Victorian culture with more modern gender views, so too I believe ideas of servitude and exploitation are slowly being given the “option” to exist. As part of the historical past, we accept these things as elements of the setting, but unlike the past we have a choice whether to accept them as hard and fast rules, or ignore and break them for our own ends. Steampunk isn’t just about reliving the past, it’s about the future, too, and all the things that inevitably come with it.

    The world the Steampunk envisions has evolved beyond the constraints of the past, both socially and technologically. A coloured gentleman adventurer? Why the hell not? Is that really any more bizarre than steam-powered war armour or a victorian woman who wears trousers, curses, and hasn’t gotten married?

    Thinking about it, I feel like the perspective in your article carries with it an assumption that Victorian society was an entirely negative place for all non-white people. While it’s true that racism barred a lot of worthy people for no good reason, there were people of colour on the periphery of Victorian society, particularly in America, who were quite remarkable. George Washington Carver and Booker T Williams come to mind. Coloured gentlemen were certainly very rare, but not unheard of. As Steampunk is an expansion upon that past, Isn’t it safe to assume that the seeds laid by men like Carver and Williams bore fruit in the Steampunk world, just as they did in our own?

  49. michelle wrote:

    A very interesting article. Before reading this, I had never even thought to consider that Steampunk might seem to appeal more to one race or another, and especially not to think that it might cause some ideological problems for anybody because of race. Perhaps this is because I live in a very diverse area, and so the issues of race rarely come up in any serious context, but I think the main reason is in my interpretation of Steampunk. To me, it is not a recreation of the past, but rather the creation of a new past, an alternate universe of sorts. As a female, my idea of a Steampunk world has automatically been modified from historical context to allow more freedom to women than was actually available at the time. It only makes sense, then, that different races would receive the same treatment of being automatically promoted to equal status in the new context. I think it’s best keep in mind that this is a subculture of modern times, not simply a resurgence of olden times.

  50. bellatrys wrote:

    Captain Nemo, btw, arguably the most iconic figure of the original genre-that-became-steampunk (well, him AND his ship) was originally going to be Polish, a rebel against the Russias – but according to tradition Jules Verne’s editors nixed that on account of how economically connected the two Empires were, and how it would be a bad idea to tick off the Tzar and get themselves boycotted in one of their major markets.

    So – so the story goes – Verne made him Indian, rebelling first against the Raj, and then against all empires and international oppressors, instead. Now, this may have been a revision, but he revised very thoroughly, having his narrator struggling to pinpoint the accents and ethnic origins of the enigmatic captain and his polyglot crew – and in the sort-of-sequel, he created a complete & lengthy backstory for Nemo, as the idealistic descendent of Tippu Sahib, the Sultan whose brilliance in the pioneering use of mortar fire kept the British East India Co. at bay for so long, who had lost everything in the Mutiny (his family, natch, being killed in punishment for his activities) and taking to the sea in bitter rejection of “civilization” after the other industrial nations of the world did not step in to help them against England, for all their talk of ‘la liberte’ &c.

    We had an interesting discussion on which Bollywood actor ought to play the canonically tall & stunningly-handsome as well as angsty anti-hero (Verne is VERY slashy!) a while back on Nothing New, and I’ve been working off and on at translating the relevant passages into a literal but not clunky version from the French – needless to say, the standard legacy British translations did a bit of a number on the content and tone of Verne’s original (his editors weren’t worried about giving their old rivals across the Channel the bird, evidently) and they Orwellized it to cast themselves in the best of lights.

    But long & short of it, if any fan of color wants to play an anti-colonial /super-genius / eco-warrior/ radical anarchist/romantic & sentimental lover, the Archetype’s there from the get-go–

  51. Cory Gross wrote:

    The interesting thing about Nemo, however, is that he’s not any better than those he opposes. The short of it is that he still descends from Indian royalty, treats his ship like a palace and his crew like serfs, and uses his technological might to wage war on competing nations and to colonize the sea. He even plants a flag on Antarctica and claims it as his own!

    Here’s my more complete review articulating these points: http://voyagesextraordinaires.blogspot.com/2008/11/20000-leagues-under-sea-1870.html

  52. Jha wrote:

    JW @ 48: While your comment is fair, and certainly common among the responses I’ve been getting from white steampunks, I think you missed my point: when PoC come to steampunk, we often see it coded “white”. I’m putting forth a vision of steampunk that is actively inclusive of people traditionally not included in Victorian society, even telling stories beyond Victorian society. I grew up glorifying Empire (as I’ve said elsewhere), and if you followed RaceFail at all (or even just following the comments here), you’d know that there is some anxiety for minority characters to have their own stories. I don’t expect white steampunks to make way for it all the time; I’m more advocating that Steampunks of Colour step up and help shape the rules for themselves.

    michelle @ 49: Certainly. As my steampunk manifesto goes, “re-colonize the past to shape the future”. I grew up in a racially diverse country as well so had the privilege of not thinking about it much, but I think it would be naive to ignore issues of race within the steampunk context. Even while white people re-imagine the past, they may not always re-imagine it to be as inclusive as they think they want to be. This is why I encourage PoC to re-imagine it for themselves.

    bellatrys @ 52: Steampunk Scholar recently nominated Faran Tahir. Would love to read your discussion on Bollywood actors playing Captain Nemo, though. ^^

  53. Jared wrote:

    if PoC are to re-imagine steampunk for themselves is it going to become a Subculture of Steampunk? Like gothiclolita has become a Subculture of Gothic and Victoria era dress?

    And if it is re-imagined by them, will they separate themselves more from ‘white’ Victorian steampunks? Perhaps it’ll create a steampunk style that spans the globe? If you taken Japanese Steampunk (like steamboy) they very much so have adopted the Westerns style of clothing into there vision but still retain the Japanese customs. It’d be interesting (picking on japan again) seeing Steampunk adapted into the Samurai way of things since that would fit more into the a Global steampunk vision, rather than steampunk is ‘Victorian’ which makes you think of stuffy old England.

  54. Jha wrote:

    Jared @ 53: It doesn’t have to be. It’ll depend on the participants themselves. Personally I think it’ll be a shame if it becomes another sub-group, because it totally misses the point of my essay, which calls for steampunk to be more inclusive, rather than segmenting off. We can’t help it if people want to have their own little groups though. Sometimes, we really just need to get away from everybody else and be “with our own kind”, so to speak. I think it’s only natural.

    I refuse to touch Japanese subcultures with a ten-foot-pole. Because all I have are visual representations, I don’t know if there’s any ideology or philosophy attached to those subcultures. All I have are pretty pictures, and that’s a pretty superficial impression. It would be interesting to see them move away from typical Victorian fare, though.

  55. Jared wrote:

    Jha @ 54: Yes i know it doesn’t have to be that way, but i just see that there is a possibility for it to become a sub group because as you said “be with your own kind”. But as the world gets more global the whole barrier between people’s race/colour what ever is starting to fall down. And yes it is counter to what your essay is about.
    Moving away from the typical Victorian fare would make the Steampunk culture more appealing/inviting to PoC.
    I don’t agree with having to get away from everybody and “being with your own kind” though. I’m married to one of your friends after all…..
    And so I see this whole essay thing about PoC and the steampunk culture and ’skips’ (what white people are called in Aus, as in Skippy the Kangaroo) from a diff standpoint to your common kwai lo steampunk.

  56. Jha wrote:

    Jared @ 55: Of course it’s a possibility. Now, imagining that the barrier to people’s race/colour will break down simply because the world is becoming more globalized? It doesn’t make the current anxiety and alienation go away.

    And you being married to one of my friends doesn’t mean anything; being with one’s own kind doesn’t necessarily mean detaching one’s self from the greater culture. It just means that sometimes, we want to hang out with people we relate to, whichever part of our identities we’re addressing. I can’t talk about steampunk to her. She can’t discuss being Aussie to me. There are different sides to a person’s identity. No one person can fulfil it all.

    Finally, you will of course necessarily see the essay from a different angle, since you are not a) a PoC in an all-white context, and b) living in the North American context. You are also taking into account Japanese steampunk, which I explicitly said I would not be touching in this essay. The racial dynamics in that context – I have no idea if there’s any.

  57. Noah Meernaum wrote:

    This is a very insightful essay and certainly raises some issues that I encounter from time to time living in a North American city (Cincinnati) where there is unfourtunately still a lot of misconceptions regarding racial diversity (and a large racial division). Cincinnati has been much maligned in the media in the past as there have been atrocious incidents (which were attemptedly hushed up by local government at the time) involving the police and city hall involving the African-American community. Thankfully our citizens have progressed beyond this and while there is still a long way to go to repair past indignities the city has made progress. I have heard remarks directed to my attire as the ‘Southern Gentleman’ (I mix my clothing from a variety of styles, and at least to my ears have no trace of a Southern accent), which I believe is attributed to the close proximity that Cincinnati has to the south (Kentucky being within walking distance).

    This style of dress is sometimes commented on as a ‘derby’ style (refrencing the Kentucky derby) as my dress sometimes includes a derby hat or ’saddle’ shoes. These comments are all in ribbing yet I have reflected that in a ‘bygone’ style of dress there will always be certain class associations that people will make based upon a first impression (the colonial reference relating to the southern gentleman). As I have been dealing with others suppositions based upon my dress for my entire adult life one can only be true to ones self and like other ‘labels’ that are attached to a certain livery trust that people judge you on more than just a particular attire.

    The association of like-minded (and similarly dressed people) in a group certainly does bespeak an association, yet it is my experience that the other people that I have encountered within this genre embrace all genders and ethnicities. If this were not the case I certainly would have nothing to do with them as this would promote an elitism which (I believe) is at the very antithesis of the Steampunk ethos.

    I hope you do not mind me sharing information on a site related to Steampunk issues, I have recently joined a site that is attempting to expand (and communicate) with other like-minded individuals beyond our merry band in Cincinnati the link is http://steampunk.ning.com/.

    Somewhere in Cincinnati,

    Noah Meernaum

  58. Jha wrote:

    Noah @ 52: I feel I cannot state this often enough (and have stated it here already): While in your experience, as a white man, in the subculture, you feel that it is inclusive, my experiences as a person of colour show that there is a hella lot to improve on.

    Does it tolerate and accept all genders and ethnicities? Sure. Does it actively seek to include minorities into active participation? In my experience, no. That is what I’m addressing.

  59. Orwin wrote:

    I really liked this article, almost entirely because it forces people to look at the non-victorian side of steampunk, particularly that of the non-white and asian population.

    (I do disagree somewhat though. I think if things had gone differently and China was a world power again earlier, Japan would be part of that, rather than independent of that. Japan didn’t really take off until they started copying the West.)

    I think the main thing one would have to keep history from doing to have that happen would be some sort of way to keep china more in control during the opium wars and the like.

    Personally, I find myself not terribly appreciative of the anglophile british-victorian viewpoint of a lot of steampunks. Neo-victorian != steampunk. Steampunk is, rather, a reflection of the basic time period of victorian era innovations.

    Myself, I am a bit of an odd duck. I am of indo decent, that is the dutch indonesian mixed breeds from the Dutch Indes, and so while most people view me as white I also occasionally do get called asian. (by white people. Which baffles me, because I don’t really see it.) But I can see the viewpoint of both sides of the equation.

    I would really love it if more people would look back into their own personal history to build their take on steampunk. (Ignoring, or sidestepping, the fact that PoC in the timeperiod, if they were successful, really did dress very similarly to their white counterparts often enough.)