More White Men Behaving Badly: A ‘Brain-On’ Look At The Hangover

By Special Correspondent Arturo R. García

hangover1

For perspective’s sake, let me start with a confession: Tropic Thunder made me laugh aloud several times, even after the misgivings I had about Kirk Lazarus. The Alpa Chino twist in the village was brilliant, even if the villagers were written like something out of an Oliver Stone wet dream. And I regularly laugh as much as I grimace at South Park and Family Guy, neither of which is exactly friendly to … well, anybody. So I’m not opposed to “lowbrow” humor.

What I cannot abide is brainless humor. And so, when I tell you that The Hangover is celluloid excrement, I don’t say it lightly. I refuse to believe that it’s “just me.” But I’m telling you, R readers: this isn’t a comedy, or even a film. I’m now halfway convinced it’s proof those cheeky Hulu “alien plot” commercials are really taunting messages of truth from our secret alien overlords. Sure, you might say, “just turn your brain off, it’s a movie,” but don’t you need a working brain to enjoy any movie?

SPOILERS AHOY!

Ostensibly a Las Vegas travel ad masquerading as a bro-mantic comedy, the root of the problem is one common to a lot of modern comedies: we’re dealing not with characters, but anthropomorphic third-rate comedic tropes – Phil the Player (Bradley Cooper), Alan the Weirdo (Zack Galifanakis) and Stuart the Wuss (Ed Helms). Coding them as such is believable when you start a film, but there’s barely a hint of personal development, let alone the “growing up” moments that usually permeate these types of films.

What makes Hangover different, I suppose, is that Doug, the groom-to-be and Sensible Guy (Justin Bartha) doubles as the Macguffin, as his disappearance spurs the remaining trio to retrace their steps around town. Along the way, they’re seemingly beset upon by “wacky” characters of various stripes – specifically, different POCs.

tyson1There’s the effeminate Asian gangster (Ken Jeong) and his aggro henchmen; the incompetent POC Officer Garden (Cleo King, playing second banana to The Daily Show’s Rob Riggle); and, of course, Mike Tyson, here playing a Dr. Evil-fied caricature of himself. Even the non-aggressive POC characters, Eddie the chapel owner (Brian Callen, who’s of Italian and Irish descent but who’s character is vaguely coded as being Not From Around Here) and The Other Doug (Mike Epps) don’t amount to anything. I swear, when Epps’ character said, “Dere you go with dat word again” – and I tell you that he said dere instead of “there” – I cringed so hard my spine must have cracked. Eddie, who tries to defend the boys against the gangsters, gets shot and is literally left behind, never to be seen again. How could we not root for these guys, right?

As is also typical in this new school of comedy, women don’t fare any better. Besides the villains in Vegas, we meet Doug’s fiancee Tracy (Sasha Barrese) and Stuart’s girlfriend Melissa (Rachael Harris), both generic hen-peckers. The former almost chews Doug out at the altar before he grovels for forgiveness, and Harris’ character isn’t allowed even one bit of humanity; she goes from Zero to Shrew instantaneously. The one woman who means well, Heather Graham’s escort/stripper with a heart of gold – wow, no lazy fetishization there, right? — is, along with Eddie, the only other person in town who isn’t trying to screw the boys over. But even Jade comes out a loser in the end; come on, does anybody really believe Stuart is going to go see her again? He barely even breaks up with Harris’ character in a wet blanket of a “comeuppance” scene.

The only POCs who seem to do well are the ones on the soundtrack – at least, in the first act of the film, when tracks by Usher, Kanye West and T.I are used to show us how “cool” the whole scene is before the evening degenerates. The film’s denouement, at the wedding, gives us a white singer “ironically” ripping through “Candy Shop” and “Fame” in what, intentionally or not, comes off like a frat-boy Sexual Chocolate ripoff. Memo to Dan Finnerty: You’re not the Eddie Murphy of 2008, pal, let alone 1988.

But the worst offense are the final three shots before the credits fill the screen. As the film concludes, we get to see pictures of what really went down during the night in question. These three doofs shown cavorting with POC strippers is one thing. The image of Stuart punching Wayne Newton might have made for part of a genuinely funny scene. But the final three shots, depicting Alan getting oral sex from an elderly woman of color, went beyond “edgy” and otherwise lazy filmmaking into something genuinely sickening. And the people around me in the theater were laughing! I wanted to stand up in the theater and yell TELL ME WHY YOU THINK THIS IS FUNNY! Was it funny because she was old? Because Alan is “off”? Is this what “turning my brain off” would allow me to enjoy?

friday1
So this isn’t like I think Hangover director Todd Phillips’ other noted work, Old School, was the tops of hilarity. But even in that movie, the characters possessed humanity – a quality none of the principals here seem to posess. Also, consider Friday, another comedy that became a hit by featuring “regular guys.” Not only would Craig, Ice Cube’s character, not have wanted to perpetrate an image like Alan’s, but do you think people would have dismissed it as “mindless humor” if, as the film’s co-writer, Cube had written him to?

The audience laughing around me at those final shots left me with a scary thought: that this really could be America’s #1 Comedy. It’s little wonder Sacha Baron Cohen is able to do what he does so easily. Maybe we’ve had it wrong all along – Borat and the upcoming Bruno aren’t comedies at all – they’re horror movies, holding up the mirror to our new idea of funny. And we can’t even see the cracks, because we’re too busy being “entertained.” Turn your brain off at your peril.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Friday Blogaround « The Gender Blender Blog on 19 Jun 2009 at 8:30 am

    [...] I’ve heard a lot about the new movie, The Hangover and how it’s super hilarious and a must-see.  Here’s a more critical review of it, More White Men Behaving Badly: A “Brain-on” Look at The Hangover [...]

  2. Your Monday Random-Ass Roundup: The failure of marriage « PostBourgie on 22 Jun 2009 at 12:34 pm

    [...] Arturo Garcia at Racialicious is not a fan of the nation’s No. 1 movie. “What I cannot abide is brainless humor. And so, when I tell you that The Hangoveris [...]

Comments

  1. Grace wrote:

    Thank you for writing this. I have not seen the movie yet, but from the start I thought “this is not going to be good.” You are the first person I have heard say that the movie is bad. THANK YOU!

  2. L wrote:

    Thanks for this great post! The Hangover is one of the dumbest movies I have ever seen and I felt like there must be something wrong with me for finding it so utterly unfunny while everybody around me was rolling with laughter.

  3. Vu wrote:

    Thanks for the review – I adamantly did not go see the movie this weekend for just those reasons. The preview features a naked asian guy jumping out of a car and yelling AAAAASOOOOOOOO!!! for crying out loud.

    It’s beyond frustrating, it’s endemic of the American situation. Part of me wants to just call it base comedy and get over it, but most of me understands that it’s 2009 – and white directors and writers are still pulling the same Missa Gorritry crap they always have.

  4. Jennifer Gandin Le wrote:

    Thank you for this eloquent articulation of my instinctive “NO! TRAINWRECK!” about this movie. I was tempted by a group of friends, but when we watched the trailer, I refused to go. Judging from this, I’m so glad I didn’t.

  5. Tracey wrote:

    Ughhh, I’ve been trying to figure out why some of my friends are praising this thing. I’m tempted to see it, but judging from the review it seems it’s already been made. Sounds like a less funny, less original Dude Where’s My Car?
    And while I loved Pineapple Express it about broke my threshold …… hold..the…f—…up.
    I was about to say for incompetant black, supposedly overweight female cops when I clicked your link and realized it’s the same freaking actress….wow…just…wow. I have a feeling this movie will do just as well as Paul Blart Mall Cop though. I think I’ll save myself the money and watch Dude Where’s..?, Pineapple Express, and one of a million other depictions of black female security officials doing an incompetant/bad job.

  6. Diana wrote:

    Thanks for the great post, Arturo. I won’t be going to see this.

  7. keke wrote:

    Hey, thanks for the post. I am a black woman who happened to like the movie, I laughed all the way through it. I went to see this movie the first night it was released and while I didn’t expect to like it at all but I did.

    There is nothing original about the movie, ending is predictable and it is offensive but I laughed out loud.

  8. keke wrote:

    @ Tracey, yes you are right. That black woman is the same cop in Pineapple Express and she is playing the same character….I noticed that when as I was watching the movie and it makes you realize how limited the roles are for a black women. I realized how limited the roles are for Asian actors as well as the Asian guy in this movie reminded me of Dong from Sixteen Candles. Having said all of that, I still laughed.

    Interestingly enough, I thought about those issues as I saw the caricatures that were portrayed in the movie, but I still enjoyed myself. I guess that makes me part of the problem. I can notice the prevalence of these problems for minority actors/actresses yet still support movies that perpetuate these stereotypes.

  9. Gwen wrote:

    I’d add that the movie also had a number of stupid gay jokes and stereotypes that made me feel rather ill, and the fact that the audience around me laughed hysterically at them made it even worse.

  10. Jay wrote:

    If you’ve seen some of Dr. Ken’s standup, he does use stereotypes a lot. He doesn’t use it all the time, but he does use it a significant portion of the time, so it was bound to come up at some point.

    Probably, a significant number of people do want brainless humour – so they don’t have to look at the ugly parts of themselves.

  11. deathblossom wrote:

    Along the way, they’re seemingly beset upon by “wacky” characters of various stripes – specifically, different POCs.

    I could tell this from the trailer. Oh look – it’s some people and like, they aren’t white! That’s soooo funny!” There was this wank where someone on the IMDB boards said this movie was the whitest movie ever and it was posted to show how stupid the comment was and all I could think was, “Yeah, sounds about right to me.” Next time someone asks where their WET/White Pride movie is, I’ll be sure to direct the Hangover to their attention.

    And yet – my mom wanted to go see it! I told her she can waste her money by herself. Fortunately, she hates going to the movies alone.

  12. Olivia wrote:

    I truly found the film hilarious. Cried from laughter at times.

  13. The Cruel Secretary wrote:

    Arturo–as always, you nailed this review.! I, too, saw the trailers at the theaters and thought there was some off-ness to it. Thanks for seeing it so I do even have to work up the intention to do so!

  14. The Cruel Secretary wrote:

    Oops! That should read “…so that I *don’t* have to work up the intention to do so.”

  15. Moviegirl wrote:

    Was anyone else offended by the baby masturbation scene? Out of all the scenes that one made me cringe.

  16. RMJ wrote:

    I was hopeful that this would be fun. Grateful the analysis in any case. Definitely disappointed in Ed Helms (I love Andy from The Office).

  17. Marcus Kwame wrote:

    Good. I’m happy I’m not the only one that thinks Sacha Baron Cohen’s work is overwhelmingly unfunny!

  18. B. Canseco wrote:

    Good review. Tho, I don’t condone letting “smart” filmmakers/entertainers off the hook; and by smart I mean ones that are making no effort to address racial/cultural/gender stereotypes beyond patting themselves on the back on some too-hip-for-the-klan BS.

    In those cases (Kirk Lazarus being an example) the fillmakers are being lazy and know they’re being lazy. The “dumb” artists might not be capable of doing any better.

  19. Arturo wrote:

    BC: Oh no, I’m not saying I condoned what TT did – just that, crap, at least they were able to get some legit laughs out of it. This film failed even on that level.

    RMJ: I’ve been a fan of Helms’ since his Daily Show days, and I was disappointed for him here, too.

  20. CD wrote:

    Concerning those last two photos at the end, I know my group was laughing because it was really really awkward to be in a theater full of strangers with a photo of a male body part in full view on the screen. None of us actually found it funny, just… embarrassing. I don’t think any of us even looked at it long enough to realize that the woman was a POC.

  21. Fiona wrote:

    Pfft. Whatever. This movie was hilarious. Of course it was politically incorrect, that’s part of its charm. When people laugh at something, it means that they think its funny. The thought, “Hmm, should I be laughing at this? This seems like a joke that could be offensive to some people” does not usually enter their minds. It was hilarious throughout and the audience I was watching it with thought that as well (not to mention the entire country). There were some white stereotype present as well in this movie (uncool white guy trying to rip off black people, nerdy white guy, weirdo white guy, slutty white girl).

  22. jen* wrote:

    this would be one of those I wasn’t planning on watching anyway. I laugh at a lot, but I’ve seen this stuff one too many times already.

  23. Mahsino wrote:

    You forgot that there’s a man with a baby! Get it? Cause it’s totally obvious that whenever men carry a baby hilarity automatically ensues- especially when said baby is wearing matching douche-tastic aviator sunglasses. Stay classy, bromance flicks.

    Thanks for confirming my suspicion that this was a complete waste of time. I guess when I’m suffering through Pelham 123 this friday, I can at least have consolation that at least I’m not stuck watching The Hangover.

    BTW. Kirk Lazarus was hilarious and I refuse to apologize for thinking so, but then again I can back up my love for that movie with something other than it was just a movie- gosh

  24. Alex wrote:

    Arturo, great review. You’re hilarious, dude. Maybe you should try your hand at writing a comedy screenplay?

  25. jvansteppes wrote:

    From the beginning of this piece I had a feeling you’d mention Sascha Baron Cohen because I think he exemplifies the twisted culture in which these kind of depictions thrive. Borat and Bruno give me the feeling that he’s a reincarnation of a minstrel show producer.

  26. karak wrote:

    Ehhh… I knew from the moment that the posters came out that it was bigger, stupider, more demoralizing version of the movie, “Dude, where’s my car?”

  27. Laurel wrote:

    Went to see this against my better judgment. I was also appalled by the fact that the character who said he wasn’t allowed within a certain distance of a school was the one to carry the baby and interact with children throughout the film.

    Also, Tyson says something along the lines of “You do crazy shit when you get fucked up.” It’s funny because he’s talking about rape (or at least being accused of rape), amirite?

  28. Melissa S. wrote:

    I saw it and I admit I laughed, but there were moments where I cringed and didn’t find it so funny. I think towards the end I was kind of forcing myself to laugh or at least I was very aware of my laughter and not in a good way.

    And you’re right, smarter comedies would be very nice.

  29. julia tillinghast wrote:

    I saw this “excrement” the other day and what you’re saying is all right on — I was also struck by the fact that the soundtrack is almost all hip hop — with a tiny bit of r & b thrown in the mix — and this is really irritating but makes a lot of sense — hip hop has become the appropriated soundtrack of white male chauvanism…

  30. Thea wrote:

    Thanks Arturo! I usually go to see all the schlock that Hollywood issues (though I didn’t like Tropic Thunder…) including all those stupid Apatow and Apatow-esque movies but I skipped this one…I think you put your finger on it when you said that the characters (even from the trailer) really seem to lack humanity completely. So it’s dehumanising to all the POCs and women (and poc women) who appear in the film, but it’s also disturbing to consider the type of masculinity – or simply just personhood – that the movie is modelling. Ugh, I just couldn’t bring myself to watch that…even for free.

  31. Alex wrote:

    This movie also reminded me of an earlier post here about perceptions of white drug use vs. perceptions of black drug use. As you say, ‘The Hangover’ is another ‘white guys behaving badly’ comedy, that everyone apparently finds uproariously funny; ‘black guys behaving badly’ would face quite a different reception.

  32. Alex wrote:

    Though, upon further reflection, I’m sure a ‘black guys behaving badly’ would still delight most of America–neo-minstrel comedy remains a popular genre.

  33. E A wrote:

    Thank you for writing this, I am fearful of the turn ‘comedies’ have tried to take because they point to the continued ignorance in popular culture as well as the ease with which it is assumed minstrelsy can still be consumed.

  34. Fiqah wrote:

    No one has said this yet. But…um…these kinda shenanigans typically get men of color um…arrested. So…short film.

    “A group of Black guys goes to Vegas, does crazy shit, hilarity ensues until they all get arrested! It’s the feel good 1/2 hour of the summer!”

    ::: roll credits :::

  35. R. Prince wrote:

    @ Fiquah

    lol, a half hour is too generous….

  36. dana111 wrote:

    Am I the only one tired of white men being portrayed as inept, childish, and stupid in almost every “white boy” comedy? The Hangover, Knocked Up, Pineapple Express, The Wedding Crashers… white men are made to appear infantile, spineless, less than masculine, callous, and stupid. Are we now more comfortable with white men being the butt of jokes than men of color? Does rendering all heterosexual white men impotent in the media make us oppressed minorities feel better about our plight?

  37. R. Prince wrote:

    @ dana111

    most of those movies were written and directed by, well, surprise, surprise: white men.
    Until they cease to completely dictate what mainstream culture is, how they and POC are portrayed in movies and on tv, I’m sorry, I just cannot feel sympathy for white men who are portrayed as “inept, childish, and stupid” in movies. POC do not have much of an impact on how they are portrayed in movies or on tv. Sure there are positive films made by POC and they portray healthy, well rounded, normal POC but that does not seem to have much of an effect at erasing stereotypes created by the white majority…
    Even if some movies portray white men in a negative light, there is always a balance in “serious” films they write, direct, or star in and play varied, complex characters, “Michael Clayton”, “The Wrestler”, … the list goes on.
    It seems when a POC steps into the realm of white movies, they are instantly turned into caricatures to be laughed at. At least white men have more of an opportunity of being seen in different lights, as human.
    just my 2 cents….

  38. c.n. edaw wrote:

    @dana111

    I guess I see your point; however I see those films as just being the entertainment extension of white privilege. They seem to say to me:

    “Gee, look at how great it is to be a white guy, we can do all kinds of crazy #*$(#@ and still….

    1) keep a job
    2)not get arrested
    3) usually get the hot chick we don’t deserve at the end
    4)not get killed
    5)not get sent to rehab
    6)not go broke
    7)still keep friends
    8) not reflect poorly on an entire ethnic group
    9) still command a certain degree of respect or status within a peer group

    The list goes on, but you get my point.

    Actually —it reminds me a lot of the work place. White men often get away with behavior that when that same behavior is exhibited by men of color or women of any race (for example expressions of anger or telling racy jokes) is deemed bad.

    I’ve seen white guys throw temper tantrums, slam doors, cuss people and everyone looks the other way. A black guy or woman does that–they are escorting you to h.r. while everyone gossips that you are either “hostile and dangerous” or “psycho”.

    I think this form of entertainment is just a reflection and extension of this double standard because at the end of the day I don’t think anyone leaves the theatre (especially all the white guys I know flocking to see these films) thinking white guys are somehow inferior–unless they already thought that.

    On another note, would the “Friday” series of films be a type of “black men behaving badly” movie? I thought they were stupid from the trailers and never watched any of them. But isnt there a similar premise in those films?

  39. Solange wrote:

    I think a lot of these comedies are directed towards stereotypical white male college students. The problem with these films is that they are stupid. You can have a comedy highlighting stereotypes e.g Dave Chappelle that is not so dumbed down. I mean these stereotype we see exists in some form, it just seems that more of our society is perpetrating these images e.g MTV BET

  40. Pickly wrote:

    Stereotypical white male college students does make sense (though having been a white male college student just recently who still thinks a lot of this is dumb, the “stereotypical” is quite important.) It does fit with the stereotype that Hollywood is going for “teenage males” with the focus being more on white people as opposed to others. Plus having just completed college these sorts of “criminal goof off” type behaviors do fit with how a lot of people seemed to act 9though perhaps less extreme, the same mentality was there.)

  41. Hibbs4Prez wrote:

    All White Guys All The Time.

    That’s what Hollywood films have become. If you say it has always been that way I would point out that at least up to the 70s it was All White People All The Time. But now even the white women are afterthoughts. Virtually every film based upon a superhero, an iconic character, a toy, a video game, etc is about white men. There are the exceptions such as Will or Angelina but for the most part its all about the white guys. This goes for animated flicks too for the most part. And fantasy and sci-fi films. And westerns. And even comedies. Remember when the comedy genre used to have a few big, black stars? Not anymore. I’m sick of reading articles about action films being male dominated and animation films being male dominated. That doesn’t tell the story. Its WHITE male dominated. Period. No other group gets close to the variety of on-screen presentation as white males. And considering that white men dominate the writers guild and the directors guild that should not come as a shock.

    In fact i think a film like “I Love You Man” is the perfect white guy film of our time. Its a bro-mance so now the white male screenwriters do not even have to pretend to care about writing an interesting role for the girlfriend. Instead they can exclusively concentrate on the straight white male characters even when writing what is deep down a romance film.

  42. YoYo wrote:

    As of today this movie is in the top 42 best selling of all time. That is a sad look at how stupid our country is becoming.