The Unbearable Whiteness of Cheerleading

by Guest Contributor Carly Kocurek, originally published at Sparklebliss

As is often the case when I find myself any place where cable is readily available. I stayed up entirely too late last night watching television, sucked into a movie I would have never deliberately viewed. Last night, the film in question was Bring It On: All or Nothing, the third installation in the Bring It On franchise. As is the case with most teen films, the plot here is fairly straightforward. In All or Nothing, preppy, perky, pink-clad Britney Allen (Hayden Panettiere) moves to a less than affluent neighborhood and high school when her father is faced with a paycut and office relocation. Forced to give up her position as the cheerleading captain at Pacific Vista, she finds herself an outcast in the meaner hallways of Crenshaw Heights. She tries out for the cheerleading squad and enters into a battle of the queen bees with Crenshaw cheerleading captain Camille (Solange Knowles).

Now, there is little exceptional here plot wise, but the racial politics of the film are interesting. In some instances, stereotypes play out without commentary, but at other points the characterizations slip easily into satire. The wealthier students at Pacific Vista are nearly uniformly white and blonde with one Asian-American cheerleader. The campus is filled with lovely seating areas and sushi carts. An hour away at Crenshaw, the student body is almost entirely African-American and Latino/Latina, and the cafeteria food looks markedly unappealing. However, when Britney finds the sole table of white students in the cafeteria and sits down, relieved, the white students, too, reject her, leaving the table immediately. In another scene, Britney’s Pacific Vista quarterback boyfriend hassles her new classmate and cheerleading squadmate Jesse (Gus Carr), who is delivering pizza to Britney’s house, saying, among other things, “Your job sucks.” These scenes and others make clear that the more salient cultural clash is one not of race, but of socioeconomic class.

While race remains a key topic throughout the film, it comes up most frequently in reference to Britney’s whiteness, and when Winnie (Marcy Rylan), who has replaced Britney as captain at Pacific Vista, launches into a racist tirade, the other wealthy teens uniformly reject her. One of the most interesting moments in the film is a confrontation between Britney and Winnie in front of the competition that has mobilized the entire plot. When Britney defends her new squadmates, all of whom are African-American or Latina/Latino, Winnie calls her “white trash.” The insult galvanizes Britney and leads Camille to re-accept Britney onto the squad (she had previously been kicked off). The interpellation0 of Britney as “white trash” fully aligns her with her non-white peers, and the insult in the context of the film is read doubly as both racist and classist, with the class insult carrying more weight, as Britney’s whiteness has been discussed throughout the film by her Crenshaw classmates.

The deployment of the term “white trash” in All or Nothing is interesting to me because it requires audience members to have a relatively sophisticated understanding of the intertwining of race and class. “White trash” as insult hinges on the racist assumption that whites exhibiting specific behaviors assumed to be characteristic of non-whites deserve to be called out — the implication being, of course, that all non-whites are inherently “trash.” This address of race and class politics in a film about cheerleading, an athletic pursuit that persists in the American imagination as a bastion of small-town wholesomeness (read: whiteness) is compelling, and suggests the complex negotiations and discussions that so often happen in seemingly facile genre films.

(Image Credit: Bring It On: All or Nothing)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. The Unbearable Whiteness of Cheerleading « 100% Juicy Juice on 11 Jun 2009 at 8:47 am

    [...] The Unbearable Whiteness of Cheerleading June 11, 2009 Filed under: Uncategorized — rociorayo @ 12:46 pm Original Post Here [...]

  2. The Unbearable Whiteness of Cheerleading « curlykidz on 02 Sep 2009 at 4:52 pm

    [...] snipped… full article here… via The Unbearable Whiteness of Cheerleading at Racialicious – the intersection of race and pop cu…. This address of race and class politics in a film about cheerleading, an athletic pursuit that [...]

Comments

  1. chris chambers wrote:

    The original Bring it On was the best. It was based on a story by black author Gary Hardwick. It was much better even as a teenie film than the next two; it even retain the social commentary of Gary’s original premise. Hell, even the acting was better.

    The next two were made for DVD quality crap.

  2. JD/ formerly J wrote:

    Solange’s hair in that picture is just making it too hard for me to concentrate.

    It is curious how insidious our understanding of race is and how it is propagated through seemingly harmless movies such as this.

  3. Raanne wrote:

    Perhaps it is my naive way of interpreting things, but I have never equated the term “White Trash” with “exhibiting specific behaviors assumed to be characteristic of non-whites”. I always took it as a socioeconomic status comment. Especially when one of the most common “redneck / white trash” stereotypes that you see out there is that they are racist.

  4. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist! wrote:

    haha, that was such a dumb, badly acted movie. Caught it on TV late at night… and i actually watched the whole movie. *hangs head in shame*

  5. jen* wrote:

    cheerleading movies are my guilty pleasure – I watch them all because I *love* watching cheerleading. [my sister and I grew up watching ESPN every Thanksgiving for the cheerleading championships at Disney World] So, yeah, I watched this one too – bad acting and all. I didn’t get the nuances brought up in this piece though…maybe I wasn’t paying much attention. But it’s something to think about.

  6. Fiqah wrote:

    @chris chambers: Co-signing on Solange’s fry-and-dye as well as original (more than one = wtf?!) “Bring It On.” I adore under-utilized Eliza Dushku, and watching Gabrielle “I Act With My Whole Entire Face” Union work her best Sistagurl was hilarious.

  7. Iggles wrote:

    I had not desire to watch the Bring It On sequels. However, your observations are are though provoking.

    I like the first one with Gabrielle Union and Kristen Dunst. It’s heads and shoulders about the DVD/made for TV crap.

  8. 9jah wrote:

    “White trash” as insult hinges on the racist assumption that whites exhibiting specific behaviors assumed to be characteristic of non-whites deserve to be called out — the implication being, of course, that all non-whites are inherently “trash.”

    I agree with this implication based on your description of the film although I may reach an opposite conclusion that this speaks more harshly about race than class. Basically, the harshest thing that I draw from this is that notwithstanding your background, sensibilities, ambition, success, whatever (none of which were explored for the black students I am sure….) if you are black/latino yeah you are trash.

    Anyways…my knee jerk reaction to stuff like this is that my mind would rot trying to follow the implications of bias and stereotype that can be drawn from countless films or even trying to understand the thought process of the people creating the dialogue in the first place.

    Ultimately minority communities have to reframe how issues of race are discussed by creatively addressing these issues in their own films. I draw from your description of this film that a white person is both the propagator of racism and credited as a hero for standing up against it (because, you know, all white people are not racist) while black/latino folks play the role of hapless subjects with no agency.

  9. k. emvee wrote:

    @ Raanne

    I think Carly is right on the money with her analysis of the use of white trash in this movie. While the term white trash is primarily a comment on socioeconomic status, it is grounded in the idea that if you are poor and white you are lacking the qualities to make you truly and authentically “white.” Race in this case is inextricably tied up with socioeconomic status and the term “white” can also be read as “white and middle/upper class.”

    When Britney was called white trash in the film it was ultimately her race that was being questioned in comparison to her former teammates who were undeniably white, possessing both the proper lack of melanin and the appropriate amount of money in their parents’ bank accounts.

    I think this holds true when white trash is used as an insult, but not necessarily when it is claimed as a term of pride by folks like Jeff Foxworthy and his ilk. Regarding the sterotyping of poor white Americans as racist (which is not a universal fact by any means), we have seen time and time again that being associated with the “other” does not necessarily make you more sensitive to or cognizant of the lives of that said other. Sometimes it certainly does, but other times it has the exact opposite effect as people strive to continue to differentiate themsleves from the other.

  10. Celeste wrote:

    @JD: I was thinking the same thing…it reminds me of early 80’s Whitney Houston. Bad choice of weave that was.

  11. CDF wrote:

    Yeah, I’ve seen parts of it…you get used to the storylines after a while. Never knew that about the original flick, Chris Chambers. Good call!

  12. Meredith wrote:

    Yes! “White trash” always struck me as WAY more racist than it is classist (and it’s extremely classist). When I first heard the term, even as an ignorant little white girl, I wondered why my friends didn’t just say “trash” to put each other down, but they had to put “white” before it. Were they assuming that non-white people were trash by default?? I guess they were.

    At any rate, people really need to stop saying it.

  13. Fiqah wrote:

    @Celeste: Actually started humming “I Wanna Dance With Somebody” when I took a good look at that ‘do.

    Racialicious Hive Mind Effect. :D

  14. The Cruel Secretary wrote:

    @Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist–

    You did WHAT? Next thing you’re going to tell me is pigs fly and Santa Claus is real.

    ::shakes head at shattered ideals::

  15. Lisa J wrote:

    Isn’t it kind of ironic that people for years have loved to do that whole “why do black kids segregate themselves” “why do all the black kids sit together at lunch” yet in the movie, you mention that little Ms. Britney goes to find the one table of white kids? HMPH

  16. Louise wrote:

    my main beef with this piece of crap film is the way , that african american (read black) or latina’s are characterised, they are always hard and bitchy and uncaring contrast that to the way that the white protagonist are portrayed, as nice and sweet and always being picked on by those JEALOUS women of colour.

  17. Jaya wrote:

    Can’t say I’ve seen this film (I stay away from anything Hayden Panettierre does, as a rule), but I found the original Bring it On pretty racially enlightened.

  18. [dave] wrote:

    I’m so upset my boyfriend didn’t let me watch this so I can’t talk about tit. I only got to the bit where Solange tried to fight Hayden when he vetoed.

  19. Liz L wrote:

    Excellent, especially this:

    “…suggests the complex negotiations and discussions that so often happen in seemingly facile genre films.”

  20. c.n. edaw wrote:

    Louise wrote:

    my main beef with this piece of crap film is the way , that african american (read black) or latina’s are characterised, they are always hard and bitchy and uncaring contrast that to the way that the white protagonist are portrayed, as nice and sweet and always being picked on by those JEALOUS women of colour.

    DITTO….and the poor helpless white girl must learn how to stand up for herself from the hardened black/latina girls..yet the poor white girl miraculously maintains her soft femininity. Ugh, Enough already.

  21. Kara S. wrote:

    Now, that’s interesting. As I watched the movie (on a FREE bootleg, mind you), I was a) struck by the sheer awfulness of Solange’s hair and b) the ridiculousness of the krumping scene, which was just too painful to watch. I was laughing, but I was horrified.

    But your analysis makes a lot of sense. I can now look (not actually watch again, unless I’m depressed and need a good laugh) at this movie and say that it can be analyzed to have a deeper meaning than being a horribly acted movie. Thank you for some validation.

  22. Louise wrote:

    A little off topic maybe but has anyone else noticed the characterisation of Black/ Latina women in these youth films horrible, they are typically presented as horrible, bitchy, jealous and loud, in opposition to mainly causasian women who are portrayed as nice “normal” people, sweet loving and just happy. I also notice a binary representation of Asian women as either passive or fiery and never in the middle ground.

    it was in save the last dance, it was in most of the bring it on films (the first one being the exception) and a few others that involve dancing white children ending up in diverse places.

    it worries me that we are spoon feeding young people this mentality.

  23. c.n. edaw wrote:

    @ Louise

    I agree totally which is why it disturbs me that popularity of these films is often held up as examples of our younger people being “post racial” when from my view– bad stereotypes abound in all of them, especially when it comes to women of color.