Back To The Future: The Racialicious Review of Star Trek

By Special Correspondent Arturo R. García, also Posted At Arturo Vs. The World

Cast1

WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD!

Let’s get the questions out of the way now:

Is the command structure in the new Star Trek entirely ridiculous? Yes!
Is the “Red Matter” the epitome of flimsy sci-fi “science”? Yes!
Is a small, evil part of me disappointed that we didn’t see Tyler Perry as Admiral Madea? Kinda!
Is Classic Spock’s entire presence a series of plot-connecting contrivances? Definitely!
Does any of this make the film any less enjoyable? Absolutely not!

No, the new Star Trek (iTrek, for short) is not anything like the original series. That’s the whole damn point, one that’s acknowledged early on. This is a different timeline – doesn’t mean prior canon doesn’t count; just that the game is different from here on out.

And even then, this story and this ensemble nailed the most important aspect of any Trek movie – the relationships between the Enterprise’s core group – while at the same time redefining them. In short: Uhura hooking up with Spock? Good. Uhura hooking up with Spock over Kirk? Great!

poster2Speaking of Kirk, he’s at the center of the biggest difference between iTrek and 8-Track Trek: Chris Pine’s version is decidedly not the Alpha Dog here. In this instance, JTK is more like a wolf in the old Kipling poem: without the pack around him, he’s effectively useless. He needs Pike to motivate him; he needs Uhura to confirm he’s not talking out of his ass; he needs Sulu to save said ass on Nero’s mining platform; and he needs both Spocks and Scotty in order to save the day. Everybody gets to shine, and the ensemble is so much the stronger for it.

Now, people are going to complain that this is “a dumb action movie,” but stop and ask: did anybody seriously expect anything involving this bunch to go smoothly? What did people want, Degrassi in space? The return of V’ger? The Phantom Menace? This story zooms along at a more ludicrous speed than Spaceball One, the heroes constantly cheat to win (the Kobayashi Maru sequence; Sulu’s embellishing his “combat training;” Classic Spock shattering about 50 different time-travel tropes) and the villain – Eric Bana’s under-developed Nero – gets punked out way too easily.

But the character work was too good to harp on any of that for too long. To wit:

The Racialicious Scorecard
uhura1Uhura: No character benefited more from both the reboot and the re-vamp of their origin. Here Zoe Saldana got to fill Nichelle Nichols’ roles and give us not just a determined, successful cadet, but one who brought a real skill-set to the table. Bring on the Uhura/Spock slashfic … er, and hopefully some insight into how those two crazy kids got together in the first place.

Sulu: Again, Kirk only survives the fight atop the first drilling platform because of young Hikaru – in a lesser movie, Sulu’s “fencing” confession would have been a set-up to make him look inept in actual combat. We got quite the opposite here. The “parking brake” bit gave us a chance to see the patented John Cho Frustrated Face. Interesting note about Cho’s casting: apparently director J.J. Abrams was concerned about having a Korean-American inheriting a role played by a Japanese-American, but was told by George Takei that the character was meant to represent “all of Asia.”

Spock: And now we come to the Big Other. The nature of Spock’s heritage gets addressed early on, and it was a little ham-handed to see Vulcans being so openly prejudicial for two reasons:
1.Would Logic not show racism to be … well, illogical?
2.We never saw him encounter racism from anybody in Starfleet – weird to think of that as “wrong,” but we’ll talk more about Starfleet in a bit.

When it came to addressing Spock’s basic inner conflict, though, Zachary Quinto pulled it off. He even brought a bit of swagger to the character (“I have no comment on the matter” and “Out of the chair” were two of my favorite lines in the movie). And when he met his elder self, I recoiled in horror because that’s what they teach you on Doctor Who, yet I must confess … ah, it got a little dusty in the theatre.

Nero: Was anybody else thrown off by us seeing an extraterrestrial villain who didn’t sound British? The guy’s working-class patois made him sound almost like a Tarantino character, but the fact he was a working-class guy almost made it work. Of course, as a villain with an ugly-as-sin ship, he was no Montalban. But who is?

Starfleet: Ok, so all of the power players were men. This is nothing new, unfortunately. (According to Memory Alpha, of the admirals seen in prior canon, most were men, only four were POC, and the only female was Vulcan. Six women, including Voyager’s Kathryn Janeway, were Rear or Vice Admirals.) But the shots of extraterrestrials and POC serving together, without anybody looking at anybody else as weird – Kirk was a misfit because he’s just that big of a clueless putz – was encouraging in the sense that, rather than the audience getting the “lesson” of tolerance handed down as a plot point, we got to see it in action. Let’s hope for some more active examples as the series continues. One more note: the doomed Capt. Robau of the Kelvin was played by Faran Tahir, an Angeleno of Pakistani descent.

Later This Week: Stay tuned for a special Star Trek Roundable!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. On the Topic of Uhura « In One Ear… on 12 May 2009 at 9:18 pm

    [...] at Racialicious: Uhura: No character benefited more from both the reboot and the re-vamp of their origin. Here Zoe [...]

  2. The Racialicious Roundtable For ‘Star Trek’ at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 26 May 2009 at 6:00 am

    [...] so, everybody catch the review thread? Andrea: yaaaay!@ Mahsino: yup Diana: yep Andrea: ya did good, arturo! Arturo: What amused me were [...]

Comments

  1. RK wrote:

    Yay! I’ve been waiting for this. Fun read, thanks.

  2. howard53545 wrote:

    Very good review. I thought the movie sucked. The logic was flawed and it did not flow.

  3. Yonah wrote:

    OK, awesome review!

    We never saw him [Spock] encounter racism from anybody in Starfleet

    No? I heard a lot of racial slurs tossed around behind his back, especially from McCoy. When you think about the equivalent of regularly referring to someone as a “pointy-eared bastard” or green-blooded whatever… I mean, it’s actually pretty intense, and not in a good way. What a working environment…

  4. Tara wrote:

    I LOVED Star Trek.

    Just one thing, slashfic is meant to imply fanfiction involving two characters of the gender, and usually implies two gay men. (lesbians, from what I’ve seen, are in the “femslash” category) So unless I was missing something…;-)

  5. K Ditzler wrote:

    Unless you’re intentionally using language differently, slash fic is specifically male/male relationships, originating with Kirk/Spock fanfic in the trek fandom back in the day. All relationships are referred to as “ships” as shortened from relationships.

    Otherwise, I’m glad you liked it. Over at the feministing community, it seems the white feminists don’t like Uhura’s portrayal much: http://community.feministing.com/2009/05/uhura-in-the-new-star-trek-mov.html

  6. Whit wrote:

    It was everything I expected and more. I loooovveedddd Zoe Saldana as Uhara.

  7. F. wrote:

    Great write-up!

    I LOVED this movie, especially how characters that were POC were portrayed.

    I think this is the first time I’ve been sitting in a theater and saw an Asian American male portrayed as a masculine “hero” in the Hollywood film on screen. (Sad, isn’t it?) [SPOILER ALERT] When John Cho/Sulu lands on the drill, throws off his helmet and takes out his sword to save Kirk’s behind, my audience spontaneously applauded and cheered. I live in the South, by the way. It was a great moment.

  8. Luis wrote:

    This is another great example of how a movie can be good without a strong plot. The ensemble acting was excellent, the action was excellent, and the film was did great things for the characters of the film. Uhura was amazing. Uhura and Spock were amazing together. Sulu brought the ruckus and didn’t make a big deal about it. In fact, Sulu, Chekov, Scotty, and Uhura all showed off their amazing talents without ever looking for an ounce of glory. Well, Scotty asked for a little at the end, but there was a crazy amount of professionalism.

    I think the “logic” of the Vulcan racism (specism?) was to expose Spocks weakness and weed it out of Vulcan society. Even Spock’s classmates’ insults were designed not because they really believed them but because they’d be the best thing to make him show his “true colors.” It’s also complicated by the fact that Vulcans and Humans really, truly are different species with different capabilities, both physical and mental… It was a very interesting and strange dynamic.

  9. Luis wrote:

    P.S. Yeah, McCoy dropped like half a dozen slurs against Spock (green-blooded hobgoblin being the most colorful). But he also said he likes him! Oh boy…

  10. Amused0472 wrote:

    I loved the fact that Uhura was smart and at the top of the academy and that she was attracted to the smart and logical Spock over JTK.

  11. Tracey wrote:

    I am so glad they gave Uhura a bigger role and emphasised her as a linguistics and communications expert, not a phone operator. And oh my oh my, not only did Sulu’s fencing kick butt, but I almost jumped out of my seat when Chekov rushed down to the transorter room ad saved the day.
    Oh, and shall I be the one to point out there have been two Star Trek posts and one related to WOW. Just saying.

  12. Dawud Adib wrote:

    I am so glad they gave Uhura a bigger role and emphasised her as a linguistics and communications expert, not a phone operator

    I was glad to see that as well. She showed that she had major BRAIN power.

  13. somedude wrote:

    I was watching this programme called Bring Back Star Trek in the UK, where the presenter tried to find and talk to the cast members of the original series. According to the actress who played Uhura, Spock was supposed to kiss her. However, William Shatner read the script and insisted that Kirk should be the one to kiss her.

  14. Michelle wrote:

    Yes. Bones was racists.

    However, in the canon of the franchise itself, he was the only character that was a true “nudge nudge wink wink” to his original character. Actually, if you look closely, his mannerism are perfect without being over the top.

    And those racists lines are almost right from some of the previous movies and TOS. For me, that fleshes those moments out a little, gives them a different context.

  15. Michelle wrote:

    Dang, I meant racist, rather specist/speciesist.

  16. WhatANightmare wrote:

    I loved this movie and will probably buy it when it comes out on DVD/blu ray. I also like Zoe Saldana, but I don’t think that Uhura was/is such a great character (this from a black woman). She didn’t take anything away or add to it. Ultimately, she played “the girl”/”the love interest.” The only difference to me was that she was darker skinned than your average woman in that role.

    They could only do so much in one film, but I hope that in the future the storylines are not all focused on Spock and Kirk.

  17. Laurie wrote:

    I did like how they didn’t fall prey to the Asian-man-has-mad-”kung fu”-skills with Sulu. He was a smart fighter, a dirty fighter, and a hell of a fighter, unhesitating, brave, and talented.

    But he wasn’t an obnoxious stereotype in that regard.

  18. gwangung wrote:

    Should point out that the strong action component of the film is a call back to the Gene Coon contribution.

    Each of Sulu, Uhura, Scotty and Chekhov played small, but significant roles. None of them were over the top IMPORTANT, but none were walk ons, either; each of them got some nice character beats. Uhura, I think, got some interesting things in being assertive, in both her personal and her professional life. Not especially ground-breaking, but not nothing, either…

  19. Irene M. wrote:

    I was actually really surprised when Uhura didn’t join the initial bar-fight. I get that she’s supposed to be nerdy cool and detached compared to the other human characters (why else would she get together with Spock?), but she could have done something other stand on the side and whine.

    Other than that, I loved it. Zoe Saldana was well cast and the Uhura/Spock relationship was amazing (it’s Star Trek, why shouldn’t the nerd get the girl?). Also, why isn’t John Cho in more movies? That boy is smoking.

  20. Fiqah wrote:

    “Is a small, evil part of me disappointed that we didn’t see Tyler Perry as Admiral Madea? Kinda!”

    ::: giggles uncontrollably :::

  21. Dane wrote:

    I really enjoyed this film. I think it’s a good jump start for future sequels. I didn’t feel as if Uhura was just “the girl,” she wasn’t the main focus but she wasn’t just a love interest either. The main focus of the movie was laying the groundwork and introducing all of the characters. Also the introduction of Kirk and Spock’s relationship was the main focus. I was glad that each person got to showcase their individual strengths in the film…something that supporting characters didn’t get to do as much of in the past.

  22. Michele wrote:

    I was a little bit startled by the Spock and Uhura relationship. I used to watch the original series. At first I didn’t like the relationsip, but now I am all for it. I think they could have made Uhura a little bit stronger, but this show was always cowboys in space. I agree with whoever said Uhura was just comforting her man. Thats what people do when someone they care for is hurting. Hopefully she will have bigger role in the sequel and we can find out how she and Spock wind up together.

  23. thesciencegirl wrote:

    I am not a Star Trek fan, never seen the movies or show (I know, I know), but I LOVED this movie. my only complaint is that the female characters seemed neither central to the plot nor fleshed out. I would like to see more of Uhura’s character development in future films.

  24. j.ceasless wrote:

    Great post. I was amazed that a movie could involve all the problems you outline in the beginning of the post and still be so awesome.

    In following the discussion here (and at feministing), I can’t quite get a grip around Uhura’s not bar-fighting being an issue. Who’s side is Uhura supposed to take in the fight? Is she supposed to jump to Kirk’s defense (some random guy hitting on her) and fight her fellow cadets? I don’t see why she would have the motivation to get into it with her classmates over a drunk townie who’s trying to get into her … skirt. (Poor choice with that costuming, IMO. The best defense I’ve read for that was so you could really tell how many women were among the men in the scenes where the cadets scramble for the shuttles. “Because it was in the TOS” obviously doesn’t fly given all that they changed.)

    Also a very interesting comment on the feministing link asks those who denigrate 8-track Uhura as a secretary to consider that bridge communications is a serious deal IRL and that its probably not a welcome characterization for those who do this job in the military today.

  25. Arturo wrote:

    re: Bones/Spock:

    While Bones has always spouted xenophobic remarks toward Spock (a nod, perhaps, toward the character’s Southern roots?), here’s why I didn’t react to his remarks here like I did to the scenes on Vulcan:

    1) Spock effectively shuts down Bones during their brief tete-a-tete on the bridge. So, not only is McCoy not presented as a threat, his remarks don’t even phase (har) Spock. One could argue that the experiences Spock had on his homeworld “prepared him” for this, but that link wasn’t spelled out
    2) On Vulcan, the head of the Science Academy himself called his human side “a handicap.” A comparable scene at Starfleet might have showed Admiral Perry making light of the other side of his heritage.

    Neither of these points make Bones’ language toward Spock acceptable by any means, but, if this new series holds true to the spirit of the 8-Track days, that relationship should develop alongside that of Kirk/Spock.

    As far as the “pointy-eared bastard” crack goes, I just filed it under Starfleet Directive 1.1: Kirk is always the a-hole.

  26. Trey wrote:

    thanks for giving me the name of that first captain! farhan is smoking.

  27. eccentricyoruba wrote:

    I just saw the movie today and I loved it. The Uhura/Spock relationship was a great bonus and totally unexpected to me.

    I agree with the commenters that mentioned it, Bones did make racist comments to Spock. And honestly when Spock saw his future self for a minute I thought he was going to die lol.

  28. Beth wrote:

    I feel like this movie would have been revolutionary … in the 60s. As it was they didn’t even have as many star fleet women as in the original series, and every woman must be sexually or reproductively associated with one of the main characters in order to exist. Oh, and there is still a miniskirt.

    The original series pushed the envelope as far as it could get away with. That isn’t to say I didn’t enjoy this movie; it was fun and retro. I just didn’t think it was anything the original wasn’t forty years ago. I’d like to think there have been some progress since then…

  29. Jha wrote:

    I can’t help but squee over Uhura.

    Bones and Spock always had this friendly antagonism thing going on all the time – ” it’s not something your green-blooded self can understand” is a recurring theme for McCoy in his conversations with Spock (and Spock likewise always gets a jab in about how emotional McCoy gets). I’ve always felt that his specism lacks malice, considering how he genuinely sees Spock as a friend the rest of the time (and won’t admit it).

    “iTrek vs 8-Track Trek” is going to kill me the rest of the evening now.

  30. dudefromohio wrote:

    I LOVED this movie. Uhura was outstanding. For once the nerd got the girl. And a beatuful girl at that! I think that was a great twist. Hats off to the writers.

  31. patsgirl wrote:

    I’ve always preferred Spock over Kirk–the alpha male who doesn’t feel the need to constantly grab his crotch to remind himself that he’s got ONE–sooo hot!

  32. Motowngirl wrote:

    I just want to say that as a black woman with strong nerd-like tendencies, I loved everything about the revamping of Lt. Uhura and Zoe Saldana’s excellent interpretation of her.

    I strongly disagree with those who saw her as “the token girl/love interest” with no depth. OK, she is a supporting character, but that is the nature of the movie. She also is clearly one of the smartest people on the ship and one considered to be an expert by her peers. She takes complete control of her body (ie/not falling to Kirk’s come-ons) and her career (ie/ urging Spock to put her on the enterprise). I don’t see how she is not a great role model for other women of color.

    Yes, some could argue against the miniskirt. But I think what’s genius about this costume choice is that it breaks Uhura’s character out of troupe that smart and controlling black women are asexual. This is a woman with depth, brain power, and sex appeal. And she isn’t afraid to use it by any means. I, for one, say rock on with your badself homegirl! You do you!

    Finally, I love that she (finally) picks the logical and even-tempered Spock over that cowboy in space Kirk. I think that, in the brief scenes they had together, they demonstrated an even and mutual respectful relationship between two intelligent beings that would otherwise be “othered” by the mainstream. The fact they chose each other instead of a white American counterpart spoke to me as a great metaphor for building solidarity among historically marginalized communities.

    Finally, before people start complaining against this character too much, I would like to remind people of Halle Berry’s failed attempts at both Catwoman and Storm from X-Men. In each instance the characters lacked even a 1/10th of the depth, intelligence, strength, control, and diva-tude that Zoe Saldana gives us in Star Trek. Finally we have a black girl in space that is kicking some ass while she’s there. And I couldn’t be happier for it.

    Here’s hoping that they give us more of this fab girl in the sequel.

    Lt. Uhura, thanks for reppin’ black girl nerds everywhere!

  33. JC wrote:

    *** Spoiler Alert ***

    I loved this movie. It could be better, and it could do without some of the glaring plot holes (if you can teleport to a moving starship in warp speed light years away – do you even need starships anymore?) , but it has become the first movie I’d want repeat viewing since the LOTR Trilogy.

    I loved Sulu’s ass-kicking even though he could be developed further (hope for the sequal!); I thought Uhura was tastefully portrayed as a smart, powerful women who has strong influence over, well, everything. Notice how she got Spock, a everything-by-the-rules Vulcan, to assign her to the Enterprise? Yeah they’re a couple but he’s a VULCAN for crying out loud. I do enjoy the romance though – I’ve always thought from the original series that the Vulcans were symbolic of Asians in the ST universe (and the Klingons were the Russians), so I’ve always though of Spock as an Psudo-Asian anyway. I also thought the movie is more about Spock than Kirk too.

    They could add more diversity to the crew, but I suppose it would be too much of a change to add another POC into the main cast. But PoC were really everywhere in this movie – I mean if you look at the ceremony scenes where the entire Academy was presence, you can see that whites is not the majority. I also liked that the Asian paramedic early in the movie got a line or two. I was half expecting him to die. :)

    I was a little disappointed that they kept mentioning George Kirk as the hero when the original captain of the Kelvin was just as heroic as Kirk and later Captain Pike. Maybe they did but I sure missed it. I AM glad he’s of middle-eastern origin though… first casualty of the 9/11 of the 22nd Century.

    I think JJ Abrams is sensitive to the issue of racial imbalance in Hollywood casting, and I get the feeling that he’s doing his best to address the situation. He still has to get the movie green-lighted so Star Trek and Lost still have to feature whites has main characters – but he’s really sneaking them PoC in there in non-stereotypical roles. I wish there are more of him in Hollywood.

  34. Tony wrote:

    To be fair, it’s logical (sorry) that people would see Papa Kirk as the more ‘heroic’ one than the orig captain of the Kelvin.

    After all, the orig Cap went on the ship and got killed, that’s all anyone really knows about his actions.
    Yet everyone sees Papa Kirk steer the ship into the enemy to save lives.

    As to Bones.
    I viewed him as akin to one of those people who uses phrases without even thinking of the fact they sound bigoted.

    (Kind of like someone raised in an all white area using old-terms for black people without realizing “colored” is no longer acceptable and “afro-American” might provoke laughter)

    He definitely didn’t seem to have a problem serving under Spock, or any more than he’d have a problem serving under anyone who made the same calls.

  35. Ei wrote:

    Aside from Uhura and Sulu which has already been discussed, two other things in this movie that really stood out for me.

    Captain Robau. I think he’s only Middle Eastern captains I have seen in all of Star Trek series. It is very nice to have a Middle Eastern guy who’s not a villain and shown as a part of the crew. His role was small but heroic, and sacrificed himself to buy time so his crew can escape. Too bad Kirk Sr took most of the glory though.

    Asian extras. There were a lot of them in the background. Here are the ones I caught.
    -The Asian doctor who delivered James T Kirk
    -Friend of the balding cadet, who got a few good punches on Kirk.
    -One of the admirals.
    -various Asian faces you see at star fleet academy.

    Granted, most of them didn’t have lines or plot significance (except for the doctor at the start), but it is a lot better than vast majority of Hollywood blockbusters.

  36. TenaciousRei wrote:

    I have not seen the move yet but I can’t wait. I also can;t help but spoil myself…lol.
    Anyway,I wanted to link to a post on LJ that someone put together about Uhura/Spock relationship on TOS:

    http://community.livejournal.com/deadbrowalking/356425.html

  37. gwangung wrote:

    Well, how much of McCoy’s phrases are genuine, internally created bits and how much are call backs to the original series (where it’s clearly springing from affection) isn’t clear; “pointy eared bastard” is pretty much on a par with “I’m a doctor, not a physicist!”

    Also, the Uhuru/Spock pairing, I think, taps the impulses that made Spock a compelling figure for female fans in the 60s: an emotionally conflicted person who’s needs to master those emotions to remain true to his own heritage, needing a person who understands that heritage, won’t demand he go against that heritage, yet still can satisfy both him AND her in a relationship. That requires a VERY special, VERY strong, VERY empathic woman. This movie gives us much less of a blank slate for Uhura than the previous 79 episodes and six movies–and it’s a much more compelling characterization.

  38. spacedcowgirl wrote:

    As I mentioned in the other thread, I did really love the movie, so I hate to crab about it here, but leaving aside whether Uhura is a strong role model as written (I agree with Motowngirl’s reasons for why she is), I still think writing in any use of sex appeal to get ahead professionally in the context of Star Trek is inappropriate. I find unisex uniforms, military-appropriate hairstyles for women, etc. much more satisfying and true to what I think the work environment would really be like (with leeway for cultural differences as, for example, shown in the Klingon, Bajoran, and Vulcan variations on the uniform and so forth. And let’s not discuss Counselor Troi). That is not to say the characters can’t have emotional or sexual lives or present themselves in whatever way they like outside of work, of course. It’s just that as gorgeous as Zoe Saldana is, I don’t really see a micro-mini and flowing waist-length hair worn down as particularly practical given the job requirements. Of course that is a quibble I have with the writers, not with Saldana or the Uhura character, and I still enjoyed the movie immensely.

  39. MK wrote:

    @ Tara and K Ditzler
    Slash may have originally solely applied to gay male pairings but the term has since evolved to include pairings of any gender(s).

  40. Erica wrote:

    I’m so disappointed I had to miss the roundtable for this one. It was awesome. I loved it. And even the many little flaws were perfect because it gives me things to complain about to my Trek-obsessed friends. (Could have used a few less lens flares throughout, though. Aaaaargh.)

  41. J.G. wrote:

    Great movie for Trekkies and non Trekkies alike. The Uhura and Spock pairing was adorable. They made a cute couple. As an AA woman married to a non AA it’s always cool to see.

    Yes thankfully she didn’t get together with Kirk. He’s cute, but she is WAY too smart and classy for him.

  42. Sobia wrote:

    Not a trekki at all but had to express my excitement at the fact that they had a Pakistani descent actor in the movie!! Total self-reference effect going on right now (I’m a psychology geek instead)

    Though, by “doomed” I’m assuming he didn’t have much screen time.

  43. Sorcha wrote:

    I don’t think Uhura stayed out of the fight because she was a girl. She stayed out of it because it was a stupid fight, guys butting heads over whose machismo was bigger, and she knew that. She strikes me as being the responsible one who was trying to stop the fight before they all got busted, but knew better than to wade into the middle of it.

  44. ab wrote:

    But Uhura does hit Kirk in the barfight. He gets pushed by one of the cadets, and but falls on Uhura. The fight could have ended there, but his arms are outstretched and he lands with his hands covering her breasts. She shoves him back and he goes flying right back into the brawl. She doesn’t keep beating him, because she wasn’t mad, just not interested, and she’d asked the other cadets to stop fighting.

    I just saw this last night and I thought it was really fun. And I agree w/the comments about Communications in the military — it’s a critically important field.

  45. Karen wrote:

    Star Trek was awesome! The Uhura and Spock love interest was a nice surprise.

  46. embarcadero13 wrote:

    CoSign Motown Girl: Uhura is able to own her sexuality in a way that is rarely seen for women of color in the media. I’m glad she has a miniskirt, and I’m glad her intelligence and success is widely acknowledged. I also loved how she checked Spock to get her onto the Enterprise.

    Also co-sign about Spock’s new swagger! (I think it came from dating a Black woman).

  47. napthia9 wrote:

    MK- There are some people who use slash for pairings of all gender, but it’s not common usage. There’s considerable resistance towards expanding ’slash’ to mean all pairings. (Slash tag on metafandom doesn’t exactly indicate m/f pairings, for example.)

    Before I saw the movie, I was worried that Uhura was mostly going to be eye candy. Someone upthread with the link to Feministing. In short, I was worried that she’d be like TV!Chapel. (Movie!Amanda is a step down from TV!Amanda though. Although probably Movie!Amanda is a better mom and Movie!Sarek a better spouse.) But Uhura’s characterization is an improvement upon her TV characterization in exactly the right way. She’s not Janeway, who’d probably fight Kirk for the chance to get her ass kicked. (Seriously, I don’t think there were more than two scenes where Kirk -wasn’t- bruised/scratched up!) Of all the cadets, she seemed the most prepared, mature and professional. Even going after Spock seemed like the sort of calculated risk that accurately evaluated the impact it’d have on their professional lives. (Also, their scenes were great! I don’t see Uhura/Spock in the original series, but movieverse? Wow!) While I also want to see more female characters being physically strong and powerful, a la Ripley & Vasquez in Aliens, Uhura’s non-physical strength was great. I’d rather they add some female goons in the barroom scene and onboard Nero’s ship.

    Still. In the interests of gender parity, I demand Sulu have an underwear scene in the next movie. Fencing.

  48. allheavens wrote:

    I loved the film. Though not a Trekkie I was a fan and viewer of the original series.

    I don’t think the hair and miniskirt detract from the fact that Uhura is a dedicated, strong and intelligent professional who is in full control of her body, her sexuality and her career. I never understood why some think that women have to be completely desexualized to be considered the male equal or have value as a fully realized human being. What the hell is wrong with sexuality? I agree with Motowngirl, “You do you, Uhura.”

    I think the Uhura/Spock relationship was inspired but what could have been more “logical” than their relationship. Otherness embracing otherness.

    Loved how each supporting character got their moment to shine. John Cho rocked as Sulu, yeah I would like to see a little more “fencing”. Anton Yelchin was suitably naive, smart and strong as Chekov. Simon Pegg got the utter the famous line, “I’m giving her all she’s got, Captain! ”

    As for McCoy’s supposed racist remarks. Just a shout-out to the character in the original series. Bones was a mint julep drinking good ole boy but he respected and cared for Spock.

    As for Chris Pine aka James T. Kirk he’s got the I-gotta-be-bad-because-I’ll-never-be-as-great-as-my-daddy swagger down which basically translates into “I’m an asshole.” Will Hollywood ever get over it’s love affair with blue-eyed, smart-ass, white boys? I won’t hold my breath. But I’ll give Pine his props as a actor he owned the roll.

    But this film is more Spock’s journey than Kirk’s. Spock as not yet acquire the poise of Spock Prime and Zachary Quinto invests Spock with a chilly, smoldering sex appeal that simmers just beneath the surface. Spock is beset by emotion and all its complexities. Maybe now Spock can finally be the winner of the “cool kids” sweepstakes because he is no longer just the emotional juxtaposition to Kirk’s swaggering hero.

    I like it!

  49. Heather H. wrote:

    No joke, Zachary Quinto is my new celebrity crush as Spock. What a terrific performance — he made me believe every moment, whether it was one of anger, humor, pain or romance.

    My favorite line was his smoldering “live long and prosper” after the head of the Vulcan Science Academy insulted his mother. You could just hear the unspoken “…asshole” at the end of it :-)

    Smart choice, Uhura, a man who honors his mother is always a good bet.

  50. Jha wrote:

    Heather H. @ 49: Smart choice, Uhura, a man who honors his mother is always a good bet.

    INORITE? I am so superglad the writers stuck her with him, not Kirk. I understand from the previes that it looks like she would be paired with Kirk, but even drawing from their qualities in canon Trek they’d still have enough in common to make sense as a pairing (she’s supposed to be second only to Spock in her understanding of the ship’s systems, and they’re both musical).

  51. Jehanzeb wrote:

    Hey everyone, this comment is coming a bit late, but I just saw the movie last night and had a few thoughts to share.

    First off, I have never seen a “Star Trek” movie or television episode before. I was a HUGE “Star Wars” fanatic in my adolescence and my friends and I would always bash on “Star Trek.”

    So this new film marks the first “Star Trek” film I’ve ever seen, lol. To my surprise, I really enjoyed it and I especially liked Sulu’s character. Like others on this thread, I felt it was so refreshing to see such a diverse cast.

    I have a few thoughts on Spock though. Even though I liked his character a lot, especially the whole half-human, half-Vulcan identity crisis he has, but I’m not sure if I’m happy with how the film ended. Spock Prime essentially tells him to stop being Vulcan and to trust his feelings over logic. It reminded me of how Frank Miller treats Superman in “The Dark Knight Strikes Again,” where Superman — an “other” like Spock — not only calls Earth *his* planet, which seems to strip him of his Kryptonian identity, but also adheres to the authority of earthlings, specifically Batman (or Frank Miller, I should say), who “teaches” Superman that he needs to follow his philosophy in order to be a better hero.

    Similarly, Kirk outs Spock as captain of the ship because Spock is not “good enough,” as if his Vulcan side makes him weaker. Since Kirk is 100% human, he’s better. Spock, who, again, is the big “other” in this movie (and the slurs used against him in the film are evident of that), needs to abandon his “Vulcan ways” because there are more valuable lessons and traits to learn from the humans. His father even startles him when he says he Loved Spock’s human mother. To me, it seems like there is something flawed about the Vulcan race, and in order for Spock to become a better captain or admiral, he needs to conform to his human side.

    Again, this is the first “Star Trek” movie I’ve seen, so I’m not sure if I’m missing anything here. These were just some things that were on my mind after I saw it.

    Thoughts?

  52. Mary wrote:

    Uhura hooking up with Spock? Good. Uhura hooking up with Spock over Kirk? Great!

    Oh, you are SOOOO right about this. For this alone, I consider the handling of Uhura in this movie awesome. I’m so, so happy the movie did not do the “even strong women get melty over bad boys” cliche. And the look on Kirk’s face at the end when he saw them together was just pure gold. Saldana and Quinto were excellent together and separately.

    I’ve always liked Sulu (Takei won me over with his intense hamming villainy in the mirror episode) and I really like what John Cho did with the part. Also I liked that Sulu and Kirk were kind of “action buddies,” because in a weird retrospective way it fits their relationship in original flavor Trek. Also, it’s nice to watch them in action without thinking about all the stories of how much Takei and Shatner hate each other in real life. And, icing on the cake, Cho and Pine are both really hot.

    Mostly I was just blown away at how well the actors fit their characters, every single one of them. Especially since it would have been so easy to get cartoonish with Scotty and Kirk, in particular.

  53. Heather H. wrote:

    Jha @ 50: “she’s supposed to be second only to Spock in her understanding of the ship’s systems, and they’re both musical.”

    Ooh, now there’s a scene I’d like to see in the sequel, Uhura and Spock singing and playing the Vulcan lyre together. But in a more private setting than the rec room scene from the original series. Could be very tender *and*hot.

  54. anna wrote:

    @ Heather H.

    One word: Fanfic. For serious. Fan stories are coming up like a barn on fire on the LiveJournal and FanFiction sites. That particular plot is already up on one of the communities at LJ. (The quality of stuff varies, but there’s a lot of interesting work up already.)

  55. cat m. wrote:

    i cannot wait for the roundtable. ^_^.

  56. pololly wrote:

    Oh my god. Just seen this today. Huge trekkie though my love is ds9 which actually has the best race relarions of the lot. But ZACHARY QUINTO oh my god. Je needs to resign his commision and take up his calling as my baby daddy. Oh god help me. There is gonna be some serious het fiction coming out of this(slash is guy/guy btw).I don’t even have a race analysis yet. Oh spock, wow.

  57. pololly wrote:

    Apologies for my terrible spelling – on a blackberry. I’m not an idiot, I just ADORE this film. What people criticizing don’t get is that no major reimagining could happen cos the fans like the characters as they are. Uhura was made interesting, sexy, intelligent and on par with the men. She can’t become captain or anything – cos the show has canon. Anyway voyager is great on women (but bad on race) and ds9 is brill on both. TNG is awesome on colonialism and its flaws. TOS was made in the 1960s and featured an interracial kiss. Basically, its not perfect but its damn good.

  58. Lisa J wrote:

    Love this movie, just saw it on Monday and I came out of there so excited. I went to see it by myself and was sad that I had no one to discuss it with but when I got in my car (with the windows rolled up) and screamed, “that was so F-ing COOL” about 3 times.

    @spaced cowboy and others upset with Uhura’s skirt , it would be kind of hard for them to not have herin a mini-skirt since she, and all the females, in the original had skirts that barely covered their butts. I mean I know the it was an altered reality but there didn’t seem to be a complelling reason to retrofit that out. At least hers didn’t show her tushie, like the old one’s did :-)

  59. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    Motowngirl, I strongly disagree with your strong disagreement about Uhura. She was indeed the token girl/love interest with no depth. On the Enterprise she did nothing but search once for coded messages–less than the old Uhura used to do.

    Oh, and she played the usual supportive helpmate to the more significant male character. But her romance with Spock was unmotivated and basically came out of nowhere.

    At the academy, she and her green roommate both served as eye candy for male viewers. And she’s still wearing a damn skirt.

    I admit Saldana played Uhura as a strong, smart, sexy woman. But she ended up as a strong, smart, sexy woman who was a token female and love interest.

  60. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    Besides McCoy, Spock experienced prejudice from other crew members at least twice. Even Kirk’s teasing bordered on prejudice at times.

    Like most space series, “Star Trek’s” attitude is that humans know best. Vulcan logic is a flaw in most cases, not a virtue.

    Some of the ST novels explored this issue and made the case that humans and Vulcans complemented and needed each other. But this attitude almost never appeared on the screen.

  61. Spaceholiday wrote:

    Rob,
    I think that Motowngirl’s analysis of Uhura is spot on. Did you read the article and the posts here? There have been some wonderful points about how exactly Uhura has quite a bit of depth, maybe not as much as, say, Spock but still…plenty of depth. This movie was already two hours long and could only do so much. Yes, hopefully she will have a more screen time in the next film but to give her more screen time in this film would have meant that one of the other characters would have been less developed. I found all the characters delightful (although I did find Eric Bana’s turn as an angry Romulan somewhat forgettable) and am glad that they got their particular moment to shine. Moving on.

    Here in America girls and women wear skirts from time to time. There is nothing ant-feminist about wearing a skirt/dress and it certainly does not make a women any less capable, smart, or strong to be in a skirt rather than gender neutral pants.

    Furthermore I’m not exactly sure what a “helpmate” is but it sounds as if you only would have been satisfied with the character if she had been an asexual robot in ugly pants with no discernible love life to speak of. Ah, yes, the sexually frustrated black woman who although being drop dead gorgeous is always perplexingly single. As if that hasn’t already been done. That is just as much of a stereotype as how you are describing Uhura (which I disagree is how the character is actually portrayed). The former allows for an integrated character, who, as Motowngirl said is both smart and completely in control of her sexuality. This is far more interesting to watch and far less damaging than just denying that women–in this case a black woman has any sort of sexuality.

  62. Spaceholiday wrote:

    As to the Spock and Uhura relationship of course Spock is more important in the context of the movie! He and Kirk were/are the main characters and this was his movie in a lot of ways. But that doesn’t mean that he was more important in the context of the relationship. The writers did a great job of portraying a loving relationship between two people who genuinely seemed to care for each other.

    Rob said “the pairing was unmotivated and basically came out of nowhere.” I’m not sure what you mean by this. On a historical note the pairing did not come out of nowhere. In the original series the characters flirted and Gene Roddenberry said that he wanted the characters to have a relationship and if not for the overt racism in 1960’s America and studio interference they might have got it on. If you are talking about in the movie than, no, again it makes sense that these characters would end up together given that they are both ambitious, intelligent, caring people.

    I have been exploring this site and a recurring complaint–where television and movies are concerned–is that there is a lack of women of color in casts; when black women do appear they are relegated to the sidelines and are either sexless “mammy” types with no potential for any sort of romantic pairing or oversexed nymphomaniacs. In this case the movie struck a nice balance between the two. In Star Trek we saw neither. The two main characters want to be with her and she chooses the man she is most compatible with. I think this is great as is the fact that it is an interracial relationship.

    Regardless of gender or race it is in people’s nature to be sexual and to deny that any group must lack sexuality or at least any visible signs of sexuality in order to be thought of as strong or smart just reeks of sexism or racism or both.

    Rob, If I have misunderstood any of your points then feel free to call me out on it

  63. Spaceholiday wrote:

    My apologies for the sentence “in this case the movie struck a nice balance between the two”. That is not what I meant to write and actually is not supposed to be there at all.

  64. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    Yes, I’ve read everything posted on “Star Trek” here. I’m not persuaded. A lot of the “criticism” seems to be about how “hot” the actors are, which doesn’t really count as criticism.

    I think you’ll find women in military or quasi-military organizations don’t wear skirts as part of their official uniforms anymore. Except in 23rd-century Starfleet.

    What the old Spock and Uhura did barely qualifies as flirting. But this movie could’ve built something on their common interest in music, languages, or computers. Instead, it put them together for no reason except to fulfill the romance angle.

    This movie was supposed to give us background on the characters, but it didn’t provide any background on Spock and Uhura meeting or falling in love. In one scene she’s his prize student, and in the next they’re kissing. At least the old Kirk used to flirt with women before he started kissing them.

    When the men show a range of characteristics and the woman is defined primarily by being “sexual,” I’d say that’s a problem. Instead of 2-3 scenes of Uhura standing by her man, the movie could’ve shown her as third in command after Kirk and Spock, giving orders and saving their butts. That would’ve been a change I could embrace.

    For more thoughts on Uhura, see the other Racialicious thread:

    http://www.racialicious.com/2009/05/26/the-racialicious-roundtable-for-star-trek

  65. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    Re “it makes sense that these characters would end up together given that they are both ambitious, intelligent, caring people”: It might’ve make sense if the movie showed the relationship develop on screen. Instead, the relationship was handed to us as a given.

    We shouldn’t have to imagine the reasons why these characters have become involved. If the romance is going to be important, show us how they fell in love. Eitehr that or save it for a future movie.

    You say there wasn’t time for it? Of course there was. Abrams CHOSE to spend most of the movie on action rather than characterization. No one forced him to.

    The movie wasted 15-20 minutes on unnecessary chases, gunfights, and explosions. Simply eliminating the gratuitous ice beasts and Scotty in the plumbing would’ve provided several more minutes for character development. That would’ve made the movie much stronger.

  66. Spaceholiday wrote:

    I agree. I would have liked to see a little more character development, especially the development of the romantic relationship, and less ice beast chase sequences (i.e. none). I think it was done that way mostly for the ‘wow’ factor which is the director’s prerogative but kind of cheats the audience. I’m hoping that they will include it in the next movie. Maybe it was just how you worded your previous posts because I can see how the character might be judged as being “primarily sexual.” Although I do think she had range here I hope they expand on that more in the next film.

  67. Spaceholiday wrote:

    Rob, did you compare Starfleet to the military just as a way of saying that it is unrealistic that women in 23rd century military organizations won’t wear skirts? I don’t think Starfleet would force women to wear a skirt; if the women do so it is because they choose to. Women in the military are routinely harassed, assaulted and raped by male officers. It is a huge problem. As far as I could see this was not a problem in the movie. I would rather have a woman wear the mintiest mini that she could find and be treated with respect then be forced to wear a standard issue uniform and be treated as less than human because she is a woman.

  68. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    I believe the movie showed every Starfleet woman in a skirt and none in pants. It seems absurd to assume they all made the same anti-feminist choice.

    And this ignores the role of the filmmakers who made the choice for them. Regardless of what the imaginary characters thought, the (male) filmmakers thought they should be in skirts.

    In reality, there was no “choice” between women treated with respect or women wearing pants. The movie could’ve told exactly the same story while giving us both.

  69. Anonymous wrote:

    Why should they be in pants? Wearing a skirt is not anti-feminist.

  70. Spaceholiday wrote:

    Wearing a skirt is not anti-feminist. The attitude that it is, however, is extremely anti-feminist.