Conditions: Five

by Guest Contributor Deesha Phillyaw, originally published at the Bitch Magazine Blog

A few years ago, I found a book-length literary magazine, Conditions:Five, amongst the discarded and donated books on the shelves in a local coffeehouse. I skimmed through it that day, just long enough to finish my cup of chai, before placing it back on the shelf. At the time, I had no idea that I’d held such a rich piece of history in my hands.

Conditions (its full title was Conditions: a feminist magazine of writing by women with a particular emphasis on writing by lesbians) was founded in 1976 in Brooklyn and published annually. The journal’s regular editors were Elly Bulkin, Jan Clausen, Irena Klepfisz and Rima Shore. According to Wikipedia, Conditions expressed a “long standing commitment to diversity; of writing style and content and of background of contributors, within the lesbian and feminist communities, [and] was especially dedicated to publishing the work of lesbians, in particular working class lesbians and lesbians of color.

Conditions: Five, the volume I found that day at the coffeehouse was published in November 1979. Billed as “The Black Women’s Issue”, it was guest-edited by Barbara Smith and Lorraine Bethel, and is considered “the first widely distributed collection of Black feminist writing in the U.S.” More from Wikipedia:


[Barbara] Smith’s article “Toward a Black Feminist Consciousness” (1982), first published in All the Women Are White, All the Blacks are Men, But some of Us Brave: Black Women’s Studies is frequently cited as the breakthrough article in opening the field of Black women’s literature and Black lesbian discussion. She has edited three major collections about Black women [including] All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave: Black Women’s Studies (with Gloria T. Hull and Patricia Bell Scott), 1982; and Home Girls[1]: A Black Feminist Anthology, (first edition, Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press, 1983; second edition, Rutgers University Press, 2000).

Smith and the Combahee River Collective [a Boston-based black feminist lesbian organization, 1974-1980] have been credited with coining the term identity politics, which they defined as “a politics that grew out of our objective material experiences as Black women.”

Conditions 5: The Black Women’s Issue was hugely popular, and set a record in feminist publishing by selling 3000 copies in the first three weeks it was available.

Last year, I recalled some of the pieces that I’d read in Conditions: Five, and decided to try and find the collection online. Searching again today, I found it offered several places online, but at the time of my original search, only an independent bookseller in the UK popped up. I ordered it and delved right into it when it arrived. From the opening poem dedicated to Audre Lorde with its haunting refrain (”Your silence will not protect you”) to the classified ads at the very back, from the established writers to the lesser-known ones, this collection is a gem.

Many of the pieces–over 40 poems, prose poems, stories, essays, journal entries, song lyrics, and critical reviews–with their wit, mother wit, boldness, and raw sentiments, sent me a-Googling, wondering, “Where are these women now?”

A few highlights:

INTRODUCTION

“One of the most exciting aspects of this issue of CONDITIONS is that so many new Black writers are being published in a feminist publication for the first time. So often women’s publications, presses, and organizations have claimed that they could not find any women of color as an excuse for their all-whiteness…This issue…clearly disproves the “non-existence” of Black feminist and Black lesbian writers and challenges forever our invisibility, particularly in the feminist press.”

The editors go on to detail the precise steps they took to solicit submissions far and wide. They lament that the collection isn’t more inclusive as it lacks the voices of women in prison and older Black women, and does not include writings on racism and ageism, Black female economic oppression, nor on Black women and the health care system.

POETRY

The title of Lorraine Bethel’s seminal intersectionality poem says it all: “What Chou Mean We, White Girl? Or, The Cullud Lesbian Feminist Declaration of Independence (Dedicated to the Proposition that All Women Are Not Equal, i.e., Identical/ly Oppressed)”

ESSAY

Gloria Hull’s “‘Under the Days’: The Buried Life and Poetry of Angelina Weld Grimké” ((b. 1880-d. 1958), a biracial woman whose great aunt was the abolitionist and early women’s rights activist Angelina Grimké Weld)

In “‘Artists Without Art Form’: A Look at One Black Woman’s World of Unrevered Black Women”, Renita Weems (nowadays Rev. Dr. Weems) analyzes and pays tribute to Toni Morrison’s work.

Eleanor Johnson reflects on her chosen profession in, “Reflections: On Black Feminist Therapy”. Of her Black female clientele, she writes:

From jump, a presumption that I discarded fast was that the dynamics of communication between two Black women as client and therapist would be easy as pie.

Who am I for this woman? Who is she for me? How does she see herself? Does she see herself? Am I able to see her?

Perhaps we’re to work through the slave mentality she’s been taught to cultivate. She’s come in to turn in her Mammy-badge after having allowed everyone to feed off of her. Is that why she’s so tired? Will she guard herself against me for fear of one more ounce of bottomless giving? Or will she fight me for caring since that’s her lot, taking care of everyone but herself.

The back pages are comprised of ads for feminist presses and magazines, feminist and black literary journals, feminist and women of color artist collectives, and women’s bookstores; an ad for Sweet Honey in the Rock, for a feminist newspaper, for The Women’s Writing Center in Cazenovia, NY, and for Chrysalis, the “hot new magazine of women’s culture.”

The typeset, layout, and absence of URLs in these ads date them and contribute to a sense of nostalgia. Are there more or fewer such entities dedicated to feminist and women of color media these days? A lot has happened in 30 years, and yet I recall as recently as last year heated blogosphere debate about the “lack” of voices of women of color in feminist/women’s publications–the same conversation editors Smith and Bethel alluded to in their introduction to Conditions: Five.

It would seem that the Conditions editors, regular and guest, understood the importance of ongoing dialogue about intersectionality, as evidence by a footnote to “Minority”, a poem by Judy Simmons. In one stanza of the poem, Simmons contrasts her people (black) with Jewish people:

mine is not a People of the Book/taxed

but acknowledged; their distinctiveness is

not yet a dignity; their Holocaust is lower case

The editors’ footnote explains:

The editors of Conditions: Five went through a difficult process in deciding to publish “Minority” because of the way in which is raises issues about political and personal relationships between Black and Jewish people, particularly Black and Jewish women. Feminists are currently confronting the problems of both racism and anti-Semitism in the women’s movement. As a result of the discussion initiated by this poem, we and the ongoing editors of Conditions feel that it is important to encourage dialogue between Black and Jewish women. The ongoing editors plan to publish an article based upon one such discussion in a forthcoming issue of Conditions.

Conditions: Five was a groundbreaking publication in 1979, but reading it today can serve as an occasion for reflection: How would, for example, the idea of a “black women’s issue” of a feminist publication be received today? And more broadly speaking, what new ground are we breaking in terms of intersectionality and feminist thought/media? Are we continuing the dialogue?

[1]Conditions: Five would serve as the basis for the Home Girls anthology.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Comments

  1. m.dot wrote:

    I read Home Girls Anthology last September and it changed my life.

    It confirmed that I was not alone as a Black woman, a Feminist as someone who did not just want to argue with folks, but felt that I could and had an obligation to make a contribution to society with my work.

    It ain’t no joke.

    Thank you Latoya for publishing this.

    Thank you Deesha for writing it.

    ~m.

  2. PPR_Scribe wrote:

    Deesha, thank you for re-uncovering this important publication that you discovered the first time by happenstance. And thank you for writing about your find.

    As for this:

    How would, for example, the idea of a “black women’s issue” of a feminist publication be received today?

    I fear that Womanist/Black Feminist scholarship is suffering from its own divisions related, for instance, to social class/income, “academic/theoretical” vs “practical/activist” work, and mainstream vs marginal(ized) voices. There can be no “continued dialog” when there are so few spaces in which we are together at the same time

  3. Alyssa wrote:

    Is there a more recent edition of this?

  4. deesha wrote:

    You’re welcome!

    Good point, PPR_Scribe. Plus, I often find myself somewhere in the middle of those various binaries you put forth. And I know I’m not the only one. Interestingly, the questions I posed have received limited response, here and at the Bitch blog–but I guess that’s a response in and of itself! ;-)

    Alyssa, Conditions ceased publication in 1990. I’m not familiar with any issues other than Conditions: Five. I tried to locate Conditions: Four and haven’t had any success thus far.

  5. Donna Davis wrote:

    I bought those books at a Black Arts Fest
    thirty years ago. Those books lifted my
    confidence, gave me “friends”, and let me
    know that I was not alone in my thinking.

  6. jvansteppes wrote:

    I’m struck by the contrast between (many, though not all) white women’s groups who justify not including a wider variety of voices with the claim that ‘we couldn’t find any,’ and the humility shown by the Conditions’ editors, who acknowledge those whose voices are absent. It’s a move that expresses a commitment to their future inclusion rather than the same tired excuses.

  7. queerhapa wrote:

    Conditions: Five! Yes! Several years ago I scored several issues of Conditions from a used book store in Park Slope, Brooklyn (former HQ of Conditions, as well as WOC publisher Kitchen Table Press), but the one I was most excited about was definitely issue 5. I remember all through college reading the works of second-wave WOC, working-class, and lesbian feminists like Barbara Smith, Audre Lorde, Gloria Anzaldua, et al, referencing this journal, particularly this issue, and how groundbreaking it was. It’s dated, for sure, but I feel so privileged to possess four issues of such historic material. (In case you’re curious, I have issues 2, 3, 5, and 6).

  8. Katie wrote:

    Just wanted to say that I appreciated this post.

  9. coloredhoney wrote:

    thank you for writing about your find of conditions:five. I saw this post right after having a nearly 3 hour discussion with a few homegirls of mine outside of the brooklyn museum. earlier in the week we made an arrangement via facebook to meet up and talk black feminism and its lack of inclusion in the elizabeth sackler feminist art center the brooklyn museum opened a couple of years ago. we asked ourselves what feminism means to us. we talked about the movement that began 30 years ago. we discussed equality and opportunity from work to romantic love. it was quite rich and enlivening. i was thrilled to come home, see this post, pull out my homegirls anthology, and recognize that despite a world of urls and blip text messaging feminist movement has maintained its utmost importance and relevance. makes for a great journal entry this mother’s day. peace.

  10. deesha wrote:

    ColoredHoney,

    That sounds like a great convo you and your homegirls had. I wonder if we could get a similar virtual roundtable discussion going, *cough*LaToya*cough* ;-)

  11. Dee Galloway wrote:

    Makes me smile sadly to see all you (presumably) younguns get so excited about this collection that clearly recall purchasing NEW back in 1980 at the Woman To Woman Feminist Bookstore in Denver, Colorado. It sits on my bookshelf to this very day, right next to my original editions of Home Girls and This Bridge Called My Back. Finding Woman To Woman and Conditions: Five It was the beginning of my coming out process as a feminist and as a lesbian. It’s sad, although not at all surprising, to know that Black feminist voices are still missing and marginalized in the greater feminist monologue/dialogue. I urge anyone who gets their hands on Conditions: Five to make a point of reading “Whatchou Mean WE, White Girl?” Only a bit dated, for me it still expresses the basic disconnect between black and white lesbian feminist perspectives.

  12. deesha wrote:

    Dee,

    I read “This Bridge Called My Back” in college, and even the mere title rocked my world. ;-)

    I tried to find “Whatchou Mean…” online, so that I wouldn’t have to type it in (it’s looooong, as you know), but no luck. References to it, but not the fierce poem itself.