Fashion and Patronizing, Colonial Rhetoric, Take #758080

by Special Correspondent Wendi Muse

So even though fashion designers have a tendency to appropriate and re-design fashion they witness during their world travels (or, cough, imperialist imaginations), the magazine writers and journalists just can’t seem to find the right words to characterize the collections. Instead of talking about geometric prints, the use of found objects as jewelry items, and color choices in a way that could be deemed appropriate and less offensive, they shade their words with sweeping generalizations and talk about “Africa” like a one trick pony.

In a recent New York Times fashion week photo spread entitled “African Influence on the Runway,” the first mistake made is the usual assumption that Africa is one big country. Morocco has a completely different fashion history from South Africa which has a different fashion history from the Congo, just, you know, as a tiny example. So in the title alone, they end up equating the diverse fashion traditions to one big imagined Africa. To make matters worse, the corresponding article is entitled “Out of Africa.” In reading the captions, I kept waiting for a punchline. The Times was just being ironic and funny, right?

Nope. They were for real.

Photo 1: a woman with crimped hair

“In the 2009 spring season, African style is a drumbeat through the clothes and accessories. Surprisingly it isn’t about the ethnic. Instead, it is the sculpted geometric shapes of Africa and its rich spicy colors that are the strongest forms of identity. Couture coiffeur Orlando Pita created these sculptural silhouettes for Christian Dior.”

African style is a “drumbeat?” Come on, y’all, really? Oh and just in case we forgot, “rich spicy” is not a way to describe food. It describes a continental identity in its “strongest forms.” Barf.

But wait, there’s more. . . so much more!

Animal prints on dark-skinned black women also scream “AFRICA!” in a really cartoonish kinda way . . . I love pink African leopards, don’t you?

Next up, Photo 3: a woman who takes a modern approach to the mumps:

I love the pants. I hate the description:

“The colonial world has also been mined for inspiration. For Ralph Lauren, the colonial looks fell somewhere between India and Africa, with low-crotch pants- those in between sarouel and jodhpur styles that are so a la mode this summer.”

I love that the colonial world has been “mined” for inspiration. What an adorable reference to the suffering of thousands of people in sub-Saharan Africa from the introduction of British, French, Portuguese, and Belgian colonialism. What a blast! No pun intended!!!! Oh and just in case you forgot, India is a country. So is Africa, you know, that big country in the southern hemisphere.

Photo 4: Marc Jacobs gets “spicy” with African masks:

Ok, gotta admit, these are awesome. The writer thinks so, too:

“Shoes are leading the forward march of African style- if you can get your hands on them. When it appeared on the runway, who could have believed this fantastical footwear could be the hottest item for summer 2009? No wonder Marc Jacobs baptized this shoe “Spicy,” giving a name to the shoe, as had previously been the custom with the now-fading it bags.”

Oh “African” style. . .

Nothing says “tribal” like a rouched burlap sack jumper dress!

“The most dramatic example of tribal fabrics was offered by the Japanese designer Junya Watanabe. He came up with bold prints in an African palette of big-sky blue, burnt orange, earth brown and leaf green. Those fabrics were made into pretty summer dresses.”

Next photo: Yup, every African woman I know has flowers growing out of her head. I haven’t been able to get it to work for me yet. Maybe it requires some special secret African recipe:

Photo 7: More headgardens!

Only this time, the cranial forest comes with jewelry made to look like it came from animals that are now endangered thanks to continued exploitation of Africa’s (continent or country? The mystery continues!) natural resources. We’ll look more “African” that way!

“Accessories with an African stamp work best for summer in the city, as seen at Marios Schwab. Bangles are everywhere, from wide cuffs to narrow bracelets, mostly in inventive modern materials to emulate the ivory and horn of now-endangered species.”

I find it humorous that the only time we ever see any reference to people of color on the runway is when they are practically mocking the cultures from which they originated with outlandish re-creations of “ethnic” style. I think it is wonderful to find inspiration in various cultures’ customs and traditions, especially when it comes to fashion, but there are far better ways to discuss said inspiration without patronizing, belittling, or oversimplifying said cultures. To add insult to injury, even in fashion lines that claim inspiration from other nations, the runways themselves remain white as Siberian snow. Diversity seems to only be a possibility when the colonial imagination of the designer runs amok or if he or she is deciding in which nation lies the possibility of cheaper manufacturing. Sigh.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Decline Designs » Blog Archive » Things I Love Thursday: Links Edition on 23 Apr 2009 at 11:09 pm

    [...] -Fashion and Patronizing, Colonial Rhetoric, Take #758080 at Racialicious. [...]

  2. links for 2009-04-28 « Embololalia on 28 Apr 2009 at 2:06 pm

    [...] Fashion and Patronizing, Colonial Rhetoric, Take #758080 at Racialicious – the intersection of race … In a recent New York Times fashion week photo spread entitled “African Influence on the Runway,” the first mistake made is the usual assumption that Africa is one big country. Morocco has a completely different fashion history from South Africa which has a different fashion history from the Congo, just, you know, as a tiny example. So in the title alone, end up equating the diverse fashion traditions to one big imagined Africa. To make matters worse, the corresponding article is entitled “Out of Africa.” In reading the captions, I kept waiting for a punchline. The Times was just being ironic and funny, right? Nope. They were for real. (tags: colonialism africa culture race fashion clothes) [...]

  3. Further to #2 « Zero at the Bone on 10 May 2009 at 7:41 am

    [...] to “Jungles aren’t racist!”, Fashion and Patronizing, Colonial Rhetoric, Take #758080 at Racialicious. Because fashion is never, ever [...]

  4. Orientalism, Culture and Appropriation: Part 3 « Nuseiba on 19 May 2009 at 7:30 am

    [...] has a new series on cultural appropriation available here. There is also a specific post on fashion Posted in Capitalism, Culture, Media, Postcolonialism | No Comments [...]

  5. WHAT IS “AFRICAN” FASHION? » Sociological Images on 12 Aug 2009 at 11:51 pm

    [...] Wendi Muse at Racialicious offers an excellent critique of coverage of an African fashion show at the New York Times.  The New York Times explains that “In the 2009 spring season, African style is a drumbeat through the clothes and accessories” and the descriptions are repleat with words like “drumbeat,” “spicy,” and “tribal.”  I summarize some of Muse’s analysis after the images: [...]

  6. Marc Simulacra « Kasalina on 07 Oct 2009 at 6:05 pm

    [...] Is he marketing to the group he described or just trying to cheaply, or in this case expensively commodify their “essence” into kitsch? Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)August US [...]

Comments

  1. A. wrote:

    And suddenly they wonder why Michelle Obama wants little to nothing to do with these big name expensive labels.

  2. Kavita wrote:

    Of all the terms….the “colonial world?!” I’m not the biggest fan of “developing countries” or “Third World,” but “colonial” world? Really? Who cares that India acheived its political independence in 1947, and most countries in Africa were independent by the 60’s. 50+ years later, we’re still “colonial” I guess. Lawd. Not to mention the “tribal” reference. Sometimes its just too much…

  3. miss a. wrote:

    Despite a surplus of intelligent POC fashion writers, there seems to a strange lack of anything colored in the fashion industry. Models of colors and fashion journalists of color are sparse in the field, minus the occasional word from Steven Gan. And until this year, designers of color were like Big Foot – you’d heard of their existence but had never actually seen them. Thanks to the publicity Jason Wu & Thakoon received from plugs by the First Lady, Asian-American designers are finally getting some recognition. But black luxury brand designers? Still obsolete.

  4. Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist! wrote:

    Slightly off-topic, but… there was a summit held in Los Angeles yesterday for African First Ladies to gather and discuss issues that deeply affect the African continent.

    Some of the First Ladies wore Western clothings, which somehow, seem to offend some white people who have beenleaving nasty comments on internet articles, asking why aren’t they wearing “African clothes.”

    Sigh.

  5. LaurynX wrote:

    Of all the terms….the “colonial world?!”

    I think the term colonial world referred to a time period, the colonial time period. Though I share the sentiments that it was a bad choice.

    I too wish they’d get off this “Africa” mess and get some nuance in their reporting. “Africa” has countries and many cultures. I’m wondering if it would kill them to actually name them.

  6. jerkygirl wrote:

    There aren’t many creatures more pretentious than a fashion designer who thinks he/she is being “multi-culti” by wrapping blank-faced skinny white models in animal print and giant turbans full of weeds and calling it “colonial.” For crying out loud. I’ve worked and gone to school with lots of people from various African countries (one was my Geography professor) and several of them told me they get tired of how “Africa” is portrayed, as if nothing exists there but interesting looking animals and skinny babies with flies on their eyes. I’ve had several friends from various countries tell me they can’t believe how surprised people are when they dress in Western clothing and talk about how they lived in a town, in a house, and not in some hut in a remote village surrounded by lions. We are so uneducated about the world outside of the U.S.A. and Europe, it’s almost no wonder these fashion designers think they are being “inspired by Africa” or “the colonial world” when all they are doing is exploiting and perpetuating stereotypes. :(

    @A. : AGREE. :)

  7. cocolamala wrote:

    Yup, every African woman I know has flowers growing out of her head

    i mean, what reference are they drawing this from?

    is that how black women do their hair? (nope, never seen that style on the wall at a beauty shop, or in any anthropological photo-op, ever)

    is that what high fashion stylists think they see when they look at african women’s hair?

    that would be like me sending models down the runway with mops and brooms on their heads, talking about “european-inspired” hairstyles. that would be, insulting.

    you mean with all those professional stylists, no one could come up with a method to turn bone straight hair into 3mm curls that defy gravity? Even though black women routinely tackle the opposite conundrum, they just gave up, went out back and cut down whatever was growing outside.

    “that’ll do. that’s a good approximation.”

    wow. o_O.

  8. cocolamala wrote:

    last thing,

    who the HELL is nostalgic for colonialism?

    and why is fashion interested in helping folks dress for it?

    justincaseitcomesbackinstyle

  9. Ruchama wrote:

    “is that how black women do their hair? (nope, never seen that style on the wall at a beauty shop, or in any anthropological photo-op, ever)

    is that what high fashion stylists think they see when they look at african women’s hair?”

    My guess on the first picture was that it was trying to look like a woven basket, the sort used as tables and stools at Ethiopian restaurants. (Possibly other places, too — that’s the place where I’m most used to seeing them.) So, inspired by something African, but not actually by African hair. Like if they wanted to do something “French” by sculpting the model’s hair into the Eiffel Tower. (I’m actually fairly certain I’ve seen this, or at least something like it — runway hair is weird.)

    I have no idea what’s up with the flowers, though. Head-wraps, sure, but the flowers seem to mostly be follow the “Let’s stick something awkward and silly on our model’s head!” trend.

  10. Sobia wrote:

    “who the HELL is nostalgic for colonialism?”

    Thank you! I was wondering the same thing! Why are they writing about colonialism as if its something inspirational? It was/is a racist ideology which, as mentioned in the critique, destroyed millions of lives (and its effects are still being strongly felt today). WTF??

  11. Jaya wrote:

    Jezebel has done a good job of covering this particular wtf-esque aspect of the fashion industry.

  12. R. Prince wrote:

    @ miss a. yeah, I agree that there aren’t many black designers but have you heard of tracy reese? Google her pic. She’s a black woman and her clothing line is considered pretty high end/couture. and then there is British-Nigerian designer duro olowu whose clothing I believe is sold at barney’s and saks… very beautiful, very high end but still, it would be nice to see more black designers getting some attention.

  13. deathblossom wrote:

    @cocolamala
    “Yup, every African woman I know has flowers growing out of her head

    i mean, what reference are they drawing this from?”

    To me, it came off as them trying to come up with a “fasionable” representation of women gathering carrying baskets of crops and water on their forehead.

    “who the HELL is nostalgic for colonialism?”

    The privileged white people who benefited from it and didn’t have to worry about treating people with respect (aka, being pc).

    “Surprisingly it isn’t about the ethnic. Instead, it is the sculpted geometric shapes of Africa and its rich spicy colors that are the strongest forms of identity.”

    I hate the word ethnic so much. It is incredibly offensive and it really needs to be put out there that it is because it always used as a code word for “not white” . Love the sly way of saying “It’s Africa without all the Africans, YAY!” Typical thought about culture having no ties to a specific group of people.

    And It is definitely mocking. Oh no, your culture is too otherish, but once we put a white touch on it, it’s great. Movie remakes, anyone?

  14. allison wrote:

    ugh. glad I’m not the only one who thought this was ridiculous.

  15. red wrote:

    Thanks Wendi, that was… er, really don’t know how to describe it. Oh god drumbeats, tribal, vegetating hair, it’s really got everything…

    I liked this too:
    Surprisingly it isn’t about the ethnic.

    The ethnic what FFS?

    It’s a special thing to produce something that’s offensive and also astonishingly meaningless, all in six words.

    I think I have slightly damaged my laptop after reading the “colonial world” part. I think those two words are actually the most offensive part of the whole thing.

    Agree with what cocolamala said. Perhaps with an extra word or two to appreciate how “inspiring” colonialism is, obviously.

    Note to Ralph Lauren: If you fall “somewhere between India and Africa”, then unless you are far enough north to hit Saudi Arabia, you will land in the middle of a really quite large ocean. Are you a good swimmer, Ralph?

  16. B. Canseco wrote:

    it’s the fashion industry… in all honesty what do you expect from a bunch of mostly white narcissistic half-educated people who define human interaction by fabric swatches and being a size 2?

    The fashion biz never ceases to amaze me in its cultural arrogance.

  17. 9jah wrote:

    Too ridiculous to write about meaningfully

  18. foshothoyo wrote:

    Why do people keep expecting that they are going to ever stop being ignorant and racist?

    They aren’t going to change unless they are made to change. If his market demographic boycotted his clothes, if the critics panned his disgraceful hackery, if his contemporaries vomited at his lump-headed concepts, people like this would HAVE to re-educate themselves to survive.

    But you know what? we are none of those things to these people. We don’t buy their crap, we don’t judge their industry, and we certainly don’t design the clothes.

    I’ve really gone beyond the point where i expect these people to change, and i’m sick of trying to “help” them. If you don’t mess with their money, they won’t care. Period.

  19. RCHOUDH wrote:

    Thanks Wendi for this amusing post. That “head garden” sure looks painful to wear ouch! And like everyone else I too was quite offended with that “colonial world” bit. And with them equating Africa with being one huge country and culture. And didn’t we discuss once here on Racialicious about how “animal print” outfits are really imaginary costumes dreamt up by Europeans over how they believed Africans like to dress? With that said I will say that I find the model’s hairstyle up above to be quite interesting and wonder if they were trying to mimic the famous bust of Queen Nefertiti.

  20. Misspelled wrote:

    Even this:

    “an African palette of big-sky blue, burnt orange, earth brown and leaf green”

    Now, I haven’t had a lot of opportunity to travel, but I’m pretty sure all of the habitable continents feature DIRT and TREES and the SUN and the SKY. The only reason to think of them as constituting the “African palette” is that Africa’s the only place we feel isn’t cluttered up with all that tiresome HUMANITY that you get so much of elsewhere in the world. Earth and sky to represent Europe, or Asia? They have so much else going on! Cities and towns, history, culture, art, language! Africa, on the other hand — Africa’s just a giant, empty paint-by-numbers of a pristine savannah landscape, maybe with the odd lion or rhino wandering by, or some flamingos. But hardly ever a person. And certainly no one very complicated or difficult. Why, they’re practically part of the scenery themselves.

  21. Eunice wrote:

    *throws a Nigerian magazine in designers’ faces*
    *does google search for West African/ East African/ North African/ South African clothing and shows designers*

    I don’t know where this sort of inspiration comes from. It just baffles me.

    My very small collection of traditional clothing is quivering in my closet, waiting to wrap around these models’ frames.

    “This is not our culture! Doesn’t even look inspired by our culture!” they scream. My clothing have spoken.

  22. allweatherheather wrote:

    And here I thought that “African Influence On The Runways” might mean actually mean designers from various parts of the continent or perhaps a spotlight on expats like Korto Momolu.

    I will say that Watanabe puts big, unusual headdresses on the models’ heads pretty much every collection, not just this time. So that’s something. But it certainly does not explain the other stuff (those SHOES, whoa; Lauren’s revolting comments) or the horrendous commentary that is all the NYT.

  23. Fiqah wrote:

    Cultural appropriation to the nth power.

    And I feckin’ HATE that those shoes are so fly.

  24. Britta wrote:

    “who the HELL is nostalgic for colonialism?”

    Unfortunately, most of the British elites and many of the American ones too (see: our last administration.)

    Don’t forget that several years ago when Prince Harry got in trouble wearing an SS uniform, it was to a “colonials and natives” party. At that time, people were too busy pissing themselves over a swastika to notice the INCREDIBLY offensive premise of the party. I mean, too bad he didn’t dress like the supervisor of a South African diamond mine, because that’s not offensive at all.
    Oh right, we forgot, people of color, especially African ones don’t matter. And anyways, is Africa really a country? I thought it was this black hole vortex of darkness and mysticism where white men discover themselves.

    (slaps forehead).

  25. jeff wrote:

    Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist!

    Rather than wondering about the African first ladies clothes I wonder why they are holding their summit in LA? I imagine this trip is costing a fortune that cannot easily be spared from their countries coffers. How much shopping will these ladies do and what are their talks meant to acheive? To me it sounds like a massive insult to the faces of millions of poor Africans to whom the money rightly belongs.

  26. Westerly wrote:

    Cocolamala wrote:
    “who the HELL is nostalgic for colonialism?

    and why is fashion interested in helping folks dress for it?

    justincaseitcomesbackinstyle…”

    Scarily enough, somebody obviously is just hankering for the ‘good ole days’ or whatever…

    red wrote:
    “Note to Ralph Lauren: If you fall “somewhere between India and Africa”, then unless you are far enough north to hit Saudi Arabia, you will land in the middle of a really quite large ocean. Are you a good swimmer, Ralph?”

    Hee! (Vision of Ralph floundering around.)

    Agree that a lot of the stuff is incredibly ugly and seems to be ridiculing the cultures (and the models) who are wearing it. (Most of the women look ridiculous, especially the ones in the head-garden attire. The mock Nefertiti crimp-do didn’t go down well with my partner who just asked me if a bird crashed into her head. I honestly think it looks contrived and silly – white girl plays North African. Not.)

    As to the use of the word ethnic and how it is a sweepingly broad designation that simultaneously limits people, consider designer duro olowu who uses beautiful prints and will even allow more than a single black model to grace his catwalk. He’s even considered the idea of using an outright majority of black models in his shows – but won’t. Why?

    Because he doesn’t want to be tagged as that ‘ethnic’ designer. (Prints + black models = head explosion. Put the exact same prints on predominantly white models and it’s high end chic.)

    FTR I think that black models often successfully bring out the beauty of bold prints while they *sometimes* jar or fade on white models. Where I start to object to it all is when black models are solely associated with so-called ‘ethnic’ prints and are never seen in anything else.)

    Ugh. The world we live in…

  27. Medusa wrote:

    Good post Wendi. This reminds me of a fashion show that the textile and design majors put on at my university. They had to pick a time and place and design for it. They had to pick a time and place and there were SO MANY DESIGNERS who picked things like “Africa, 1855″ while all other geographic regions got specific countries or even cities. Those people are eventually going to be big designers and keep perpetuating the same ignorant garbage. This is why I like fashion, but I hate the fashion industry. Because they do shit like this, and the general public (and the people who control the media, apparently) is too stupid to for some reason to know that AFRICA. IS. NOT. A. COUNTRY. And we don’t all have the same clothes, and celebrate the same holidays (and no, we don’t celebrate Kwaanza because it is AMERICAN) and speak a language called “African” and there is no nationality called African. It’s like when I was in high school and college (in America) all over again and people would say things like “I’m German and French” and “He’s Japanese” and “She’s Korean” even though none of the aforementioned had ever even stepped foot outside of America (parents born in America, they were born in America, had no family in their countries of origin, making them American) but claiming to be from countries they had never seen, while I just got reduced to “African” or sometimes even African-American, which I’m not.

    @ deathblossom: I HATE the word “ethnic” as well. The first time I heard someone say they didn’t want to cast someone in a part because they looked ethnic I thought “what the hell? Everybody has an ethnicity. How can she look ethnic?” Same with exotic…

  28. Bagelsan wrote:

    Surprisingly it isn’t about the ethnic.

    I literally don’t even know what this means… I think the last time I used the word “ethnic” it was in extremely sarcastic air-quotes while I described my friend’s love for burgers-and-only-burgers-no-Asian-or-non-white-food-please.

    (I kind of think the basket-hair at the beginning looks cool, but as the context piles up after it the look gets somewhat tainted by association, to say the least…)

  29. wendi muse wrote:

    side note, i know this is a stretch, but when i saw this: “Shoes are leading the forward march of African style- if you can get your hands on them,” i thought of people marching onto slave ships…you know, if they could get their hands on us first.

  30. wendi muse wrote:

    and while i realize it prob was not the author’s intention, that’s the imagery it evoked in my head

  31. red wrote:

    Wendi – that was my thought about Bangles are everywhere, from wide cuffs to narrow bracelets…

    Cuffs?!

  32. Medusa wrote:

    jeff wrote:

    Rather than wondering about the African first ladies clothes I wonder why they are holding their summit in LA? I imagine this trip is costing a fortune that cannot easily be spared from their countries coffers. How much shopping will these ladies do and what are their talks meant to acheive? To me it sounds like a massive insult to the faces of millions of poor Africans to whom the money rightly belongs.

    I know, right? Why should African politicians and first ladies ever leave Africa? Or anybody, for that matter? Any African who leaves Africa is slapping every African who behind African in the face, because it’s our duty to stay there because there are other people who are in poverty. Wait, what?

    And because they are First Ladies, they obviously will not discuss policy or anything, just spend the money they stole from their countries’ citizens on shopping.
    Or something. What the hell are you saying? This is really patronizing at best.

  33. livininphilly wrote:

    Haha… this just makes me chuckle every time I see this trend come around. For the past couple years there has been a trend of “African” or “ethnic” wear. I think the most horrifying thing I saw was last year when I saw two blatent examples of racsim and ignorance.

    1) HM magazine for summer ‘08 the trend was African (again) and the model was dutch, taking pictures in S. Africa and labeled an African Queen. Side note, the model was fluent in Afrikaans. I was shocked b/c it really seemed as if there was no forethought about the history of apartheid in S. Africa and the dutch. I thought to myself, of all the nationalities of models they choose a blond, bue eyed dutch woman to be the African Queen.

    2. An American Apparel ad (btw I despise the brand!) last year that was advertising their new “Afrikaan” leggings. They were a “tribal” print of black and white and the name, to me at least, was a blatant allusion to S. Africa and apartheid.

    These things just keep happening over and over…

  34. Michelle_2 wrote:

    Re the African first ladies, I heard the first lady of Sierra Leone (can’t remember her name) interviewed on NPR and she was impressive. She’s a psychiatric nurse and seems to be focusing on health care issues in her country.

    The impression I got was that the conference is being held outside Africa to try to give the outside world some idea of the real issues people are facing in African countries. Unfortunately, I don’t have high hopes for the outside world learning much, particularly if press coverage is focused on their outfits (?!?).

    FWIW, I think the white/western world is really invested in their idea of Africa as one large, poor, desolate and desperate country–it allows people to feel sad and sorry (and superior), and feel good by throwing a little money at it (by way of white/western ‘aid’ groups, of course). Trying to change that image is a real uphill battle, not only because people are so resistant anyway, but because changing their ideas about Africa means giving up the feel good (and superiority).

  35. cocolamala wrote:

    the First Lady of Liberia was on the Daily Show this week too. i guess they are making media appearances and sharing their country’s interests with the american public, in tandem with their shopping sprees.

  36. Kavita wrote:

    @#5, LauyrnX,

    I agree that the use of “colonial world” could have been meant to invoke the time period. But that’s the problem I was trying to elude to–over fifty years later, we are still stuck in a timewarp. They have no conception of India or “Africa” as complex, modern, evolving places–just as these timeless, quaint backwoods. Its like they don’t even have to be nostalgic for colonialism, because they never got the memo that it’s over!

  37. wendi muse wrote:

    omg i remember that h&m mag! terrible. the prints were awesome, but like…again, africa = continent!!!!

  38. Alston wrote:

    Pink African leopards FTW!

    Anyway, why aren’t these models allowed to smile?

  39. drumbeat wrote:

    As someone who has lived and worked in several African countries and currently resides in South Africa, I am equally appalled by the naive comments about Africa made my sympathetic Westerners who have never lived in sub-Saharan Africa. Africans are not suffering merely as a result of Colonialism. Sad as I am to clue you in about this, many black Africans actually had access to far better education (or…any education at all) among other things during Colonialism. The corruption and selfish decision-making is what is keeping Africa down…and the deceitful practices of “do-good” organizations such as the World Bank who seem to exist only to perpetuate the inferior status of many African countries to wealthy, developed ones. AND if you think that Colonialism in Africa has gone, please do some research on China’s subtle form of colonization that is rocking many countries over here. I’ve seen it. I’ve lived it. It’s not all the “white man”’s fault….trust me.

    Lastly, if comparisons to the land or to a drumbeat offend you, I suggest you spend some time in rural areas where drumming remains one of the predominant pastimes. Why exactly is mentioning a drumbeat offensive? Perhaps look into yourself for that answer.

  40. drumbeat wrote:

    Oh, and to the person who commented that a model who can speak Afrikaans is a negative, I’ll have you know that the Afrikaans language is being kept alive by the coloured community here more or as much as by the white Afrikaner community. The same people who attack the Afrikaners or the Afrikaans language are the people who belittle Germans as descendants of Nazis, etc. It’s JUST AS BAD when you make hurtful generalizations about a group that has done the oppressing as doing so about an oppressed group. You’re perpetuating the same backward thinking. I’m a white American and cringe cringe CRINGE at the prevalence of these comments both among educated friends at home and those I’ve worked with throughout Africa. It seems so basic to me that I question the intelligence of those making these ridiculous statements. I’ve come to the conclusion that Americans needs to stop having opinions on this place from their far-away cushy homes. Just stop. Unless you’ve lived here, just leave it alone.

  41. Angela O wrote:

    Thank you Racialicious for posting this! That colonial reference riled me up SO much: I love how the “colonial” style is the style of the colonizers and not of the colonized.

    I won’t lie, though – those shoes make me want to throw up. It’s like they picked up that weird looking thing on the street that your mother told you never to go near because you’d turn into a yam and put them on a shoe. If I wore those in Nigeria, people would run away from me because they’d think I was trying to put a curse on the street by walking on it.

  42. Angela O wrote:

    At least TIME Magazine got it right: they did an amazing photo essay with Arlenis Sosa

    http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1882050_1850958,00.html

  43. NancyP wrote:

    I rather like the first model’s crimped hair, which looks more alien than “African” (at least to me) on the model – Babylon 5 hair. Of course, it is paired with something simple that doesn’t make any attempt to look “African”. And it is a theatrical one-shot hairdo that one would never see in real life, which is the point.

    I like the olive shirt, belt, cream colored wide pants. The “hat” – ridiculous, unless you are doing a cut-rate horror show on the curse of the mummy’s tomb, in which it could be a ham-handed attempt on unraveled wrappings. And everything else – you can call it cultural appropriation, and it is, but I’d rather save typing and call it “dreck”. It does give life to the insult “her hair looks like a bird’s nest”.

  44. julieanthem wrote:

    and lets not forget daniella on this season of “the fashion show” who talks about how she lived in south africa and how she LOOOOOOOOOOVES referencing african elements because africa’s just so primal. BARF.

  45. Sami wrote:

    *twitches violently*

    “continental identity” WHAT THE FUCK. I’m sorry, is there some kind of equivalency of cultural identity between Uganda, South Africa and Kenya of which I was unaware? RHETORICAL QUESTION IS RHETORICAL, NO THERE FUCKING ISN’T. Hell, single countries don’t necessarily have “a” cultural identity – South Africa is the “rainbow nation” for a reason, because there isn’t cultural equivalency between Zulu and Xhosa, let alone black and white, let alone South Africa and Egypt.

    IT IS NOT COOL TO TAKE FROM THE CULTURAL BUFFET UNLESS YOU FUCKING PAY FOR IT. If you’re using “African” masks you better be providing clean drinking water to African villages, or else this is just a new form of colonial exploitation, YOU FASHION-FAILING DOUCHEBAGS.

    And most of your designer shit is ugly, anyway. I’ve SNEEZED better designs than those hats.

  46. wendi muse wrote:

    drumbeat:
    no one is saying it’s a white man’s fault that post-colonial african nations have had their share of problems

    but colonialism and imperialism certainly did a lot of damage that made way for the corruption and disorder that followed

    that sounds a lot like the black americans are better off bc they were made slaves argument to me…ok sure, maybe the aftermath may have resulted in a few benefits, but we, much like africans who remained in africa, are not *better off* because of european interferance by force. we can’t go bac in time and change the past, but we also cannot speculate on how things would have been if those things had not happened. i would prefer not to resort to getting nostalgic about colonial pasts. my bad.

    the drumbeat reference, no matter how accurate for some groups of people, is offensive in this case because it’s just plain tired. this reference comes up and over and over when journalists decide to talk about “Africa.” it’s an imagined africa, a one-sided africa, and an africa that is homogenous. when people talk about french fashion, they don’t ALWAYS throw around beret references or talk about accordian music or eating snails. they manage to talk about fashion linked to european countries in an intelligent way that doesn’t necessarily involve gross, sweeping stereotypes. yet somehow, when non-european continents come into play, they fall into the category subject to stale stereotypes, associations, or judgments that link all the way back to the journals of initial settlers in said countries. like a commenter mentioned on Jezebel, where this article was also linked, it’s as if the times writers read a copy of heart of darkness before penning this piece. it has the same feel…that africa is a hyper foreign, super different, mysterious, strange, and if not that, then cartoonish, trope-laden, and culturally stagnant.

    so heck yes, i am going to be offended when a drumbeat is brought up when talking about the great country ahem of africa, and not because i dislike drums or don’t recognize and understand their importance to many individual nations within africa, as you assume, but because it shows the writers can only envision one africa, when there is far more to the continent than that.

  47. Sami wrote:

    @drumbeat:

    I’ve lived there. I was fucking born there, and your argument is still bullshit.

    1) Colonialism is, in fact, the root of just about all Africa’s problems. Failures in post-colonial governance are not exactly unlinked; after long-term overt paternalism and cultural violation, “granting independence” and just fucking off thereafter? Not helping. Arguing that the poor black folk were better off under white rule because post-colonial events have shown that they can’t manage self-rule… can you see what you’re saying here? You’re basically claiming that black people can’t handle self-governance. That they’re better off if white people run things for them (and in the absence of white people, the YELLOW PERIL IS SCREAMING IN!!!)

    2) You are correct that all Afrikaaners are not hideous, racist bastards. I’m half-Afrikaaner. Some of my best cousins are Afrikaaners. Livininphilly’s implication that Afrikaaner = Apartheid is kind of offensive. (As is your assumption that Afrikaaners are historically oppressors and that’s it, by the way. Afrikaaners have a history of BEING oppressed as well.)

    HOWEVER, labelling a blonde-haired blue-eyed woman as an “African Queen” is so fucked up I’m not even going to bother explaining it, and labelling “tribal” prints with “Afrikaan” is essentially assigning ownership of all African cultural products to the one WHITE African ethnic group, which… can you say it with me? IS RACIST.

    As for your claim that Afrikaans is being kept alive by “the coloured community” – you know, the only ethnic group for which it’s not TOTALLY FUCKING RACIST to refer to them as “coloured” is the Cape Coloureds, who, it’s true, are predominantly-Afrikaans-speaking… except that treating them as a homogenous group is, in fact, extremely offensive, because they are not one.

    So congratulations, you’re a racist douchebag convinced of your superiority to ignorant Americans (and, of course, those foolish, corrupt, selfish black people who never should have been given self-government) and of the impossibility that you could be racist since oh my god you’ve LIVED IN AFRICA. You can mix your cup of shut the fuck up with sorghum instead of coffee.

  48. A.D. Nix wrote:

    Yikes. The clothes? Troubling. The writing? ABOMINABLE. You would think that this approach had worn itself out around the 3,098th time someone had to write about YSL’s ‘Safari’ references. ‘Out of Africa’? Really? There are 20 year old Cathy cartoons that are fresher. If you’re going to do your worst as a cheerleader for cultural appropriation and rote stereotypes, at least put in a soupçon of fucking effort with the writing. Good god.

    @ cocolamala
    You may be thinking of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, the (first lady) President of Liberia. She probably has even LESS time for the shopping. Poor dear.

  49. Paz wrote:

    I’m wondering if there is a possible way for (non-African) fashion designers to reference African cultures and still be respectful. The NY Times failed miserably here, but Africa is filled with rich beautiful cultures and their influence in fashion can serve as a way to show people that Africa is more than just a continent of poverty and disease. But yes, I know that often when the beauty of Africa is portrayed, it’s made out to be an exotic, primitive curiosity.

    If a non-African fashion designer did choose to be inspired by for example, Zulu culture for their collection, it would be deemed appropriation, no? And while I can see that argument, on the other hand, fashion design stays Eurocentric and Africa stays exotic because it’s deemed untouchable.

    Sigh. I really wish society would reach the point where we didn’t need to scrutinize Africa’s portrayal in the Western msm. I feel Africa is sometimes made out to be a poor delicate little puppy that can’t do anything on its own, which I think can be almost as damaging as thinking it’s a primitive, destitute land.

    Sigh. I really wish society would reach the point where we didn’t need to scrutinize Africa’s portrayal in the Western msm. I feel Africa is sometimes made out to be a poor delicate little puppy that can’t do anything on its own, which I think can be almost as damaging as thinking it’s a primitive, destitute land.

  50. wendi muse wrote:

    here is the permalink for the fulltext article on which the photospread is based:

    “Out of Africa”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/fashion/31iht-fafrica.html

    some highlights include the following:
    “To spice up this footwear, the designer added everything but the kitchen sink — as long as it was out of Africa. Snakeskin, plumes and semiprecious stones set the tone for a shoe that was inspired by Josephine Baker, the famous singer and dancer of 1920s Paris. She resonated with the exotica that was prevalent in a period when the Ballets Russes had set off one fashion trend and the discovery of Egyptian mummies another. ”

    and

    “But it is the shoes that are leading the forward march of African style — if you can get your hands on them. Chloë Sevigny is one Hollywood star who has managed to get her feet into the Vuitton Spicy shoe, thereby creating a celebrity gold rush for the footwear. The demand is all the more piquant because no pair of these shoes is alike, enforcing a desire for the unique, handcrafted object in which Africa itself excels.

    The irony is that one step on African soil in this high and mighty footwear would probably bring even a hardened fashionista to her knees. Yet, in fashion, the dream creates desire. And there are, among the dizzyingly high shoes, sandals that are flat and strappy, in snakeskin or gilded fake crocodile, that would be as useful on the shores of the Limpopo River as in the world’s fashion capitals.”

    seriously, i don’t understand how suzy menkes could have written this and successfully look at herself in the mirror the next day without punching the glass

  51. Ellie wrote:

    OK, so a lot of well-deserved vitriol, but I want to know if the shows themselves – the clothes, hair and design – offend you.

    And whether you will write about them yourselves, using more appropriate language – satorially or satircally, depending on whether you like the trend or not.

    I agree that many many fashion journalists seem to be at an utter loss to talk meaningfully about non-Western cultural influence. I am really surprised no-one’s stepped up to the plate yet. Surely someone has a major in African art history?

  52. BrownSkinLady wrote:

    @cocolamala. Uhh, the ‘First Lady’ of Liberia you referenced is actually their first female President. She was great on Jon Stewart, but don’t forget her office…

    As for the commentary on the fashion, it’s horrific. Also, those low-slung pants are called ‘harem pants’ in a lot of the stores I’ve seen… don’t even feel like unpacking all of that Orientalist shit on top of the African colonialism…

  53. Ain't I an African? wrote:

    @cocolamala: Who’s nostalgic for colonialism? Check out this website- http://oldafricamagazine.com.

    @ drumbeat: I am Kenyan born and bred and have lived all my life in Kenya. If you are implying that things were better during colonialism you are DEAD WRONG. Nobody denies that we have leaders who are corrupt in every sense, but to romanticise colonialism is not right. The British brought their glorious education, governance systems and economic system to this part of the world and forced it on our people with a gun, a whip and a hangman’s noose. There is nothing defensible about dehumanising Africans, whether you are a colonial, a fashion designer or a Kenyan, Congolese or South African despot. Let’s not make comparisons about who is less evil than the other. Nobody is blaming everything on white people, but they are certainly to blame for some things. Accept it.

    On the drums issue, drums are great instruments and no doubt there are many people who play and listen to drums in Africa as in every other continent. People play drums on all continents, but the problem is the stereotyping of Africa being only or mainly about drum beating. And just by the way, beating drums is not something that rural or any other Kenyans tend to typically do as a pastime.

  54. wendi muse wrote:

    Ellie,

    re: your first question:

    I wrote the following in the last paragraph: “I think it is wonderful to find inspiration in various cultures’ customs and traditions, especially when it comes to fashion, but there are far better ways to discuss said inspiration without patronizing, belittling, or oversimplifying said cultures. ”

    so yeah, nothing wrong with designers using other cultures’ wares as inspiration, in my opinion. that’s a natural process that goes both ways. however…it’s the discussion of said clothing that bothers me because it almost always relies on stereotypes and broad generalizations, esp if the discussion revolves around style generated from a non-european or non-u.s. location

  55. wendi muse wrote:

    Ellie,

    re: the second question…i am not a fashion journalist. here at racialicious, we talk about fashio & beauty a lot,but usually from the historical/racce/ethnicity perspective and/or pointing out the problems with which people from margininalized racial and/or ethnic communities are presented when it comes to the fashion world.

    however, there should be more recruiting within the fashion world and the journalism community to talk about this stuff. i don’t think that one necessarily needs a background in art history or african studies, however, to properly address what the author defines are “ethnic” (read: non-european) fashion. i’m not an expert on say, korean art, but if i were to attend a fashion show and be assigned to write about the influence korean art had on that particular designer’s line, you’d better believe i’d do my research and word my article in a way that would not stereotype or joke about korea’s suffering under japanese or american rule, or the comfort women, or the change in language due to imperial pursuits of the aforementioned countries, there has to be a lightbulb moment when one realizes that the words used in a piece have meaning,and that one needs to be careful that the meaning not completely offend, alienate, or generalize the group(s) concerned

  56. pololly wrote:

    @ drumbeat

    TOO ANGRY TO EVEN MAKE COHERENT ARGUMENTS

    So a white American *visits* South Africa and is now an expert on the whole of Africa and African history. And suprisingly *shock horror* thinks that colonialism was fine (except when it’s being done by those pesky chinese), and the rest could be solved if those lazy Africans just pulled themselves up by their bootstraps?

    Thanks for sharing your wisdom with us, idiot. The worst thing is that having found racialicious and being brazen enough to call yourself ‘drumbeat’ you probably think you are crazy progressive and some sort of expert on what africans ‘think’ and ‘want’. Pathetic.

    I’m leaving the actual refutation to Sami – I’m just here to state that you are a neo colonialist fool and no different to the generations of fools before you whose racist and backwards thinking has crippled Africa’s development and autonomy.

    Here’s a clue: Africa doesn’t need idiots like you to speak for it. So go back to your ‘tribal jewellry’ and your ‘authentic art’ and leave us alone.

  57. Olivia wrote:

    Just wanna say black doesn’t equate to African. Some people on here regularly change between the two.