Should black folks save Ebony and Jet magazine?

By Guest Contributor Tami, originally published at What Tami Said

This weekend, I received the following breathless entreaty through a listserv that I subscribe to:

Ebony/Jet Magazine on The Verge of Financial Collaspse (J P)
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:45:31 -0400

One of the most notable permanent fixtures in every black household (back in the days), was the Ebony and Jet magazine. If you wanted to learn about your history, the plight of Black America, current issues facing Black Americans, how the political process of America affects you, how politics works, who the hottest actors were, what time a particular black television show aired, who got married recently, who were the most eligible bachelors and bachelorettes in your town, what cities had black mayors, police chiefs, school superintendents, how to register to Vote, what cars offer the best value for the buck, who employed black Americans, how to apply for college scholarships, etc., more than likely, Ebony or Jet magazine could help you find answers to those questions.

We have recently been informed that the Johnson Publishing Company is currently going through a financial crisis. The company is attempting a reorganization in order to survive. Many people have already lost their jobs with a company that has employed thousands of black Americans during the course of its existence.

In order to support this effort to save our magazine, my friends and myself have pledged to get a subscription to both Ebony and Jet magazine, starting with one year. We are urging every other club member who comes across this plea to do the same. Please post, repost, and post again, to any blog that you may own or support.

Please email this to every person that you know, regardless of their background. Let them know that Ebony and Jet magazines have been part of the black American culture for three quarters of a century, and that there is a lot that they can learn about black American culture from reading them.

We are currently discussing the idea of throwing an Ebony/Jet Party, where people can eat, drink, and sign up for their subscription on the spot. Please spread this idea around to all that you know. Your Sororities, Fraternities, Lodges, VFW Posts, Churches, Civic Groups, Block Clubs, Caps Meetings, Book Clubs, etc.

It would be a crying shame, to lose our historic magazine, during the same year of such an historic event as the election of our first black President of the United States.

Now, like a lot of other black people, I grew up with Ebony and Jet magazines on the family coffee table. I remember fondly sitting in the brown recliner in my grandparents’ back room reading a then-oversized Ebony with Billy Dee Williams, James Earl Jones and Richard Pryor on it. (Don’t know why I specifically recall that issue of the magazine, but for some reason it is one that remains etched in my mind.) I say this to illustrate that these magazines are part of my cultural history. Nevertheless, when I read the missive above, my first thought (after wondering if the message-writer understands that subscriptions generally account for far less of a publication’s revenue than advertising does) was…”Meh.” I’m not so sure that Ebony and Jet, as they stand today, are institutions worth going to the mat for.

To be sure, John H. Johnson, founder of the Johnson publishing empire that produces Ebony and Jet, represents an inspiring success story. When the 27-year-old entrepreneur launched Ebony in November 1945 (Jet was founded in 1951.), he did so in a climate of mainstreamed racial injustice. Black GIs, like my grandfather, were returning from fighting for “freedom” in World War II to find they were less than free at home in America. Real black voices and black life were obscured by stereotype in American media. Local black newspapers, such as another iconic Chicago publication, The Defender, and Johnson’s magazines were among the few places where black people could see their lives and culture reflected and read news important to them. We mattered to these news and lifestyle outlets. Forget the New York Times, these were our publications of record.

Today, Ebony enjoys a circulation of more than 1.4 million, while Jet reaches nearly 1 million people each week. But I suspect neither magazine is as ubiquitous in the homes of my generation of black folks (GenX) as they were for my parents and grandparents. The truth is, like many Civil Rights-era institutions, both publications began feeling irrelevant a long time ago. Yes, black people still need someplace to see their lives and culture reflected and to read news important to them. (Today’s media is much better in covering people of color, but far from perfect.) But are Ebony and Jet the go-to places for that anymore? No, because while black America has changed over the last 60-some years, these publications have seemed largely the same–like museum pieces. I think of them fondly (like my grandparents’ old recliner in the back room), but emphatically not as publications-of-record.

An example of Johnson Publishing’s out-of-touchness? Sunday at the neighborhood Wal-Mart, I picked up a Jet for the first time in forever, in preparation for this post. I wanted to know if it was still there. In an age when black women are fighting stereotyped images of ourselves as Jezebels, playthings and acoutrement for the latest hip hop star whose cuts are banging in the whips of white, teenage suburbanites–it couldn’t still be there. But, yeah, centerspread, there it was–that paean to black woman thickitude–the Jet Beauty of the Week, a young, black woman in a teeny swimsuit giving sexy face. Is this what I’m supposed to rush to the battlements to save?

The forefront of the black communications revolution is now on the Web, where brothers and sisters are breaking news (Jena 6), championing causes and serving up provocative opinions. Ebony and Jet, I think, have failed to keep pace with a world where there is Ta-Nehisi Coates and What About Our Daughters and Racialicious and Aunt Jemima’s Revenge and Womanist Musings and TransGriot and Something Within and Color of Change and Pam’s House Blend and The Root and Black and Married with Kids, and, hell, Bossip. Today, black readers can get superior writing about politics, black life, marriage, parenting, sexuality, pop culture, identity, racism, sexism, spirituality, finance and a host of other issues, for free, everyday, all day, online. The topics covered (or not covered) by Ebony and Jet, the lack of depth in writing, the formats, the frickin beauty of the week, make these publications seem frozen in time, while the world speeds up around them.

Beyond all that, how is Johnson Publishing going to adjust to the new digital age? It’s not the only print purveyor facing this question. Local newspapers across the country need to answer it too. America has changed the way it consumes information, and so far, print media hasn’t found a profitable way to adapt. That’s a shame, because we desperately need the Fourth Estate. We need in-depth reporting. Marginalized folks need these things more than most. God knows that black folks could use the shot to our collective self-esteem that Johnson Publishing’s products offer. But taking extraordinary life-saving measures to rescue publications like Ebony and Jet is merely stalling the inevitable unless ailing publications put strategic plans in place to innovate and evolve.

Look, the older I get the more pieces of my past mean to me. (That’s probably why I spent the weekend watching old episodes of “Columbo,” “Quincy” and “MacMillan and Wife” on Netflix.) But nostalgia isn’t enough reason for me to join the charge to save Ebony and Jet. All the Ebony/Jet parties in the world won’t make a difference if these black cultural icons aren’t making the changes necessary to save themselves.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Saving ‘Ebony’ and ‘Jet’. Or Not. « PostBourgie on 27 Mar 2009 at 5:07 pm

    [...] Tami wonders if Ebony and Jet, which are in dire financial straits, should be saved.  [...]

  2. Black News: Ebony and Jet Magazines May Go Down « Black Money and Black Wealth, made simple on 25 Apr 2009 at 1:43 am

    [...] The black blogosphere is buzzing with the rumor that two media staples of the African American community are on the verge of disappearing. In February, Black Enterprise magazine announced that Ebony and Jet magazines were "restructuring to avoid layoffs," with the cheerful sub-headline: "Johnson Publishing Co. employees told to reapply for jobs." Now in late April, people are e-mailing, tweeting and talking about the possible irrevocable demise of the only media brands every black person in America knows. Some are even starting a campaign to save the magazines with a subscription drive. A quote via the site Racialicious: [...]

Comments

  1. Lola wrote:

    the last thing people should do is subscribe to a magazine that is about to be canceled, Domino magazine had a record number of subscribers but the advertisements were not there so down it went.

  2. Monie wrote:

    Ebony and Jet may not be perfect but I have a feeling I would really miss them if they were gone.

    This makes me think of HBCU’s and how now that African Americans are able to go to historically White colleges many Blacks have forgotten the importance of HBCU’s.

    So now a few other magazines sort of cover what Black people are up to and so we’re going to turn our noses up at Ebony and Jet?

    I think we, African Americans, have to be careful of what we let go of. Jet and Ebony are apart of our history. They aren’t simply magazines, they were there for us when we really needed them so what’s wrong with us being there for them when they need us?

  3. Sean wrote:

    I have to agree, Tami.

    As a black Gen X’er myself, I also remember Ebony and Jet magazines being almost like the furniture in the house. (to be fair, Jet always featured “a young, black woman in a teeny swimsuit giving sexy face” in Beauty of the week… it was my favorite part of the magazine, but I digress.)

    Unfortunately, times are not the greatest for print media across-the-board, let alone one that caters to POC. You are correct -the print media has largely failed to adapt to the way information is consumed. Same could be said for the record industry.

    Ebony magazine IS looking a lot like Life magazine these days… and we all know there was only one thing certain about life.

  4. Sean wrote:

    BTW I just found out that Blender magazine has just folded. I guess the print medium is fast becoming as archaic as land-line telephones, desk-top computers, and the U.S. postal service.

  5. Eva wrote:

    Sometimes I think we in the USA are too into tearing down the old in favor of “progress.” It’s interesting that in Europe there are buildings still standing over 200 years old, where in the US, we tear down a building that’s over 30 years old and consider a person over 35 “old.”

  6. Ike wrote:

    I say, “save it” if you still read it and enjoy it. I don’t, so I won’t bother. I never really found the magazine to be interesting.

  7. G.D. wrote:

    this is very, very on point. I’d go so far that the nostalgia that you’re talking about has actually been Ebony’s business model. The subscription party e-mail never suggests why you should subscribe to them *now*; you should subscribe to them because of their historical import. It’s a pretty telling pitch, I think.

    an old girlfriend and i (we’re both journalists) were once walking by a magazine stand when we saw the infamous ‘N-Word’ issue, (2006?) which marked the magazine’s self-conscious and clumsy foray back into topicality. A co-worker of hers had just left their newspaper to work at Ebony, and as we flipped through the pages, we were trying to figure out how they could possibly be making enough money to lure away young black talent from major newspapers, and why any journalist who’d ever covered an important beat would choose to work there; Ebony never, ever breaks news, no one ever shouts out a well-written aritcle, and I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone link to a story in Ebony/Jet on a blog or referred to in another publication. It’s business model seemed stuck in amber in some mythical time when black people really, really cared about Holly Robinson Peete’s new home.

    Awhile back, I read a stunning piece by Katherine Boo in the New Yorker called ‘The Marriage Cure.’ It was topical and heartbreaking and focused very narrowly of two black women in an Oklahoma City housing project, and it almost brought me to tears. Or even the recent GQ feature about the mess of an inheritance mess that James Brown left in his wake. What does it mean that all the most thoughtful, well-reported long-form journalism about black lives was not happening in black publications? Are they assuming that black folk would never dare read the Atlantic or Harper’s or Vanity Fair?

    I learned to read in large part from reading my aunt’s Ebony and Jet magazines. But we’re adults living in a complicated, shrinking world, and Ebony/Jet thinks the most pressing issue facing all of us is ‘nigger.’

    I won’t say good riddance, but I feel no obligation to help them stay afloat.

  8. BluTopaz wrote:

    With me, it was my grandmother who saved all the Jet magazines in chronological order. Makes great nostalgia, but there’s no way I am going to financially support a dinosaur for sentimental reasons. And Ebony lost me years ago with one of their feature articles: Do Black Women Set Their Standards Too High? I have learned more in one year of reading sites like this one, and several of the others you have mentioned-than in all the years of reading Ebony and Jet. Yeah, coverage of the Ebony Fashion Fair shows were fun to look at, but that world is over.

    Come to think of it, unless Essence nixes their celeb couple cover rotation (if I see one more Will & Jada cover), and Black Don’t Crack! /Our Favorite Brothas photoshoots, that mag can become obsolote also. I picked up a recent issue with an article about why do reverends like to cheat with the sisters in the congregation? That’s also very useful information that’s worth a subscription price (insert sarcasm). Essence was the one publication we could count on to see Black women not being degraded-it’s a shame it has not evolved.

  9. sdg1844 wrote:

    I agree. You either adapt or go the way of the dinosaur. It’s a shame, but I haven’t read Ebony or Jet in over a decade. They just aren’t relevant to me or my lifestyle.

  10. nat wrote:

    As I’m not based in America I can’t subscribe but if I did I would. It’s 2009 and black women are still being ignored by the mainstream media, we can’t afford to let the magazines that don’t ignore us die. Besides living in England I have to rely on black US magazines as we don’t get any of our own apart from Pride which I just can’t take to as it seems second rate.

  11. Tori wrote:

    I think that Ebony and Jet just have not kept up. They recycle some of the same articles and have not really changed their format to match the times. Ebony and Jet should like at Essence, which although I’ve written an e-mail to Essence recently about their antiquated dating advice to black women, they do continue to have a web presence as well as print. I feel that maybe this will make way for a new set of magazines. Ebony and Jet were created when there were no magazines with blacks on the cover. Now, it would be nice to have a magazine that catered to the growing changes amongst blacks particularly my generation. It would be nice to see a black woman like Tamar-kali on the cover to talk about being a black rocker, something that shows more diversity in the community.
    Maybe blogger Evia can make her move and maybe get Johnson publishing to make her blog into a magazine. I am sure her dedicated readers (and haters) would buy it.

    Even if Ebony and Jet can’t be saved something else will rise up.

  12. aimerrouge wrote:

    @ BluTopaz –> Thank you for your comment.

    You may be tired of Will & Jada, but Mary J. Blige is obviously blackmailing Essence.

    I thought I was the only one who noticed the abundance of articles about why do reverends and the sisters in the congregation.

    The fashion spreads full of clothes you can only aspire to buy (due to their prices).

    And my lowest point, a beautiful dark complected woman with natural (kinky) hair was featured as the cover model one month wearing orange. The next month many Black women complained about the model and insulted her (too dark, bad hair, etc.) I gave up. If Essence reader had devolved to this, I no longer wanted to be associated.

    I just let me subscription lapse and never looked back. I was tired of being dissapointed and irritated every month.

  13. mute wrote:

    @ monie

    “So now a few other magazines sort of cover what Black people are up to and so we’re going to turn our noses up at Ebony and Jet?”

    if a magazine fails to produce relevant and engaging fare, that’s its own fault. (and these days, even if Ebony and Jet were doing that, its no guarantee they would be on stable ground financially.) if failing to be drawn in by its subpar content is “turning up ones nose”, then so be it.

    Another magazine that used to be published by JPC was called Negro Digest which was deaded sometime in the late 70s. It began in 1942, but John H Johnson discontinued it in 1951. After badgering by readers he brought it back in 1961 and in the early 1970s it was renamed Black World. Black World never brought in that much money, but it was highly relevant forum for black artists and intellectuals in the late 60s and 70s.

    I’m giving this little historical run down to perhaps offer a possibility for what could happen with Ebony. If it disappears now, it doesn’t necessarily have to be forever and perhaps a hiatus in publishing and a rebirth as an improved magazine is just what is needed to keep the Ebony legacy going. I mean, I don’t know if that idea is economically feasible, but even stepping back and reconsidering how they can make their website meatier would be worthwhile. Even if Ebony just continues online, that’s not death thats just the new millennium.

    also, i’m wondering if we are past the age when one publication can grab the attention of so much of african america the way ebony did. ebony was remarkable because at its peak it captured the attention of a wide swath of the black middle and working class. the digital age is all about niche and the internet allows people to tailor their reading material in ways that one print magazine just can’t match. there’s definitely no returning to the golden days. ebony needs to decide what kind of life it wants to live before it begs us all to save it.

  14. NancyP wrote:

    You’ve hit on a problem endemic to all specialized publishing, and to general publishing as well. (These two magazines have characteristics of both types – targeted demographic, large circulation). What troubles me is the problems of accessibility for the lowest income people. There is potentially a big up-front cost, and a continuing cost, to internet access at home. Yes, people can use the libraries, but if they only have 30 minutes a week, it becomes difficult to become efficient.

  15. Amused0472 wrote:

    Time and resources may be better spent archiving the Ebony and Jets for posterity. Johnson Publications should then foray into something new that is evocative, well-written and more timely. It needs to reinvent itself for to survive.

  16. Chris Chambers wrote:

    Outside of pa’s barbershop and ma’s beauty shop, where is there Jet?
    As for Ebony, the Johnsons, in true storng man/woman personality-based old school mode of running stuff, refused to evolve and grow with society and increasingly tech base news and feature dleivery systems, take on new types of investigative reporting; on the other side of the coin, they don’t even do fluff and celeb gossip that well.
    Accordingly, under the rubric “Society doesn’t need newspapers [magazines like Ebony]. We need journalism,” I say bye.

  17. Ada wrote:

    I haven’t read those mags in forever. Their formats and articles are kind of last century. Besides, in this new gen, we’re seeing more diversity in “mainstream media.” Why read Ebony when Marie Claire is an option?

  18. caroaber wrote:

    What stuck in my craw was that Ebony was not fostering good journalism and didn’t cultivate prime writers.
    It was celebrity-driven; it focused on rich people and their toys (cars, mansions), television and movie personalities (as well as athletes) and Protestant religious figures. I found the features on obese people to be off-putting, but I appreciated the features on the accomplished singletons and college students.
    I expect the Johnsons made some bad investments and that advertising revenues are down. The marketplace will weed out those publications which are unfit to survive on their own. It is adapt or die, and I can’t predict whether Ebony or Jet will survive.
    For the record, I am not a subscriber, but I did grow up in a household where both magazines were read and cherished.

  19. A.D. Nix wrote:

    @ mute
    “if a magazine fails to produce relevant and engaging fare, that’s its own fault. (and these days, even if Ebony and Jet were doing that, its no guarantee they would be on stable ground financially.) if failing to be drawn in by its subpar content is “turning up ones nose”, then so be it.”

    I agree.

    ‘Ebony’ I liked, ‘Jet’ and it’s “Beauty of the Week” I could never relate to but there was some pithy stuff in there sometimes. It will be sad to see them go but both felt severely out of touch upon my last read. And that was the early-90s. We can do better than Ebony and Jet in terms of black-oriented media.

    @ Ada
    The thing is, Marie Claire and other mainstream outlets still aren’t a terribly great option. Sprinkling in a few off-white models or an occasional piece on a black or Latino writer isn’t quite cutting it. I do think it’s important that widely distributed, easily accessible media better reflects the audience it pretends to serve. But we aren’t even close.

  20. Larissa wrote:

    Last year I read a lovely article about Dr. Martin Luther King’s sister, Christine Farris King in Jet Magazine. The article was a beautiful tribute to the surviving member of the that generation of Kings; with the exception of one appalling error that even the editor-in-chief did not pick up on and still unnerves me to this day.

    The article made the claim that Dr. King was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald. As most people above the age of 20 are wont to know, by the time of King’s murder Oswald had already been dead four years – after assassinating JFK. It pains me to think of younger readers mislead by this kind of carelessness.

    With all due respect to everyone’s memories of both Ebony and Jet, I have to wonder if that type of fluff is worth saving without first restructuring. (READ: hiring a new editorial staff, or at the very least, a fact-checker.)

  21. mute wrote:

    @ Amused 0472
    “Time and resources may be better spent archiving the Ebony and Jets for posterity.”

    I totally agree. Those Google archives for Ebony only go back to 1960. The magazine started in 1945! If only for the amusing (and numerous) bleaching cream ads, the earlier stuff should be scanned too. And Negro Digest/Black World probably deserves a better archive than microfilm as well.
    ——-
    tangent: Several months ago I found a couple of Ebony greeting cards in the Rite-Aid. There was a Ruby Dee and Ossie one and a Betty Shabazz one. I’m not sure if they said anything inside. The mushy part of me couldn’t resist buying the Ruby & Ossie. It was too cute to resist. But that was the first time in a long time I was compelled to pick up anything with the Ebony logo on it.

  22. Asada wrote:

    Please remember,
    magazines, movie theraters, tall building, newspapers etc are the dinosouars of our times. They are no longer as relevant unless you want a hard copy of what is already on the internet.

  23. Brigitte wrote:

    If Ebony somehow morphed itself into “Emerge” I would buy a subscription into a heartbeat.

    As it is now, I wouldn’t sign up for a free subscription. Aside from the fashion issue (which they chose not to repeat this year) I can’t remember the last time I even bothered paging through an issue on the newsstand.

  24. Marya wrote:

    While subscribing to the magazines would help a little, it is really the money from advertisers that keep magazines afloat. Using a more recent example, the collapse of Domino magazine or CosmoGirl was not lack of subscribers but lack of advertising dollars. While typically more subscribers means more advertisers vying for the magazine pages, with the current recession, a sizable portion of companies are not advertising as much regardless of how large a market a magazine reaches. I’m afraid Jet and Ebony may need more help than more subscribers can give them.

  25. Emmeaki wrote:

    I haven’t read these two magazines much in at least ten years now. I don’t know if it is because I grew up, but I began to feel that these magazines didn’t represent me or Black people in general.

    These magazines seemed to portray Black people as this monolithic group, but we have come a long way since these publications were founded.

    What is “The Black Community” now that we can get any jobs and live anywhere that we want to? I live in NYC now and I haven’t lived in an all black community since I was a child.

    I would like to see an magazine for African-Americans that talked about real issues facing black people without treating us like we all think alike. I would like a magazine with in-depth journalism instead of something that looked like it was written by a high school or college newspaper reporter.

    I have nostalgia for Jet and Ebony (yes, they were like furniture in every Black household back in the day!), but it they are going to stay around, I hope that they improve and become more relevant for today’s audience. It’s time to step into the 21st century.

  26. Lisa wrote:

    NY Times has an opposite take: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/28/business/media/28press.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

    I have never read either of these; but if Latoya, Jay Smooth and Too Sense ever scare up venture capital to launch their own such publication, they’d have at least this one white subscriber.

  27. Monie wrote:

    It’s amazing that so many people on this thread say that Ebony and Jet are irrelevant and then go on to say they haven’t read either magazine in years.

    I suppose some people just make up their mind that something is beneath them and that’s it.

  28. G.D. wrote:

    Lisa: That article bugs. So they get to ask questions at press conferences; big whoop. Ebony may get a higher profile under the Obama administration, it has never done much political coverage, and fawning looks at the Obama family aren’t exactly must-read, standard-setting scoops.

  29. Dee Galloway wrote:

    Seems to me that the very fact that so many folks on this thread haven’t felt compelled to read Ebony/Jet in years (yes, I’m one of them) rather clearly illustrates their irrelevance. Finding something irrelevant also does not mean we think these publications are “beneath us,” it only means that they don’t speak to us. Am I to be faulted for choosing to focus on sources that speak to me rather than on those that do not?

    I’m in my fifties, and nostalgia is the only reason I would pick up a copy of Ebony or Jet while perusing the magazine racks in the grocery or drug stores. Occasionally, I might see something on the cover that will make me open it up, but I can’t remember the last time one of their stories grabbed me enough to make me both pick up and purchase the magazine.

    It’s simple: if these magazines were covering issues of importance to me, I would know about it and I would be reading them because they would very likely be being discussed on Racialicious et al, the internet being the new “word of mouth.”

    If publications are not relevant enough to enough people to make them worthwhile investments for advertisers, they fold. This is, quite simply, the nature of the industry. It does not deny or discount the value the publications once had.

    There is no doubt that archives of Ebony/Jetwill become highly valued African American legacies, as are the archives of the original Crisis and Fire magazines.

    I am the ultimate authority of what is important and relevant to my life. Neither tradition, history nor sentimentality are enough to make these publications important or relevant for me.

  30. browne wrote:

    You know while I think Ebony and Jet are “different” I think it has value. Not so much in what it is doing now, but what it did. I’ll buy a year subscription. I’ll throw it on the coffee table, while my black friends find it old and dated my friends of other races find Ebony Magazine and Jet pretty freakin fascinating, so why not it’s not going to cost that much.

    Think of all of the time you’ll save on odd questions about hair and black culture, you can just say: Go over to the pile of Ebony and do some research….lol…

    Browne

  31. Celeste wrote:

    I read them growing up but not anymore. I don’t have money to spend on publications I would never read.

  32. c.n. edaw wrote:

    “I think that Ebony and Jet just have not kept up. They recycle some of the same articles and have not really changed their format to match the times. ”

    AGREED!

    In high school (I’m 30) my friend and I used to play a game where we would see how many Ebony magazines..years apart…had the EXACT SAME articles just with new names and pictures inserted.

    Amazingly, no matter how much time had passed, no matter what the issue –the premise and conclusion of the articles were the same. However, I’m sure you could say the same thing about People or Cosmopolitan.

    Perhaps we expect too much from our black publications in much the same way we expect too much from blacks in the public eye. And perhaps we think the contents reflect or reflect on us more than we should.

    I quit reading Essence a few years ago because I was convinced it was contributing to, rather than easing, the malaise a lot of single black women have about their singleness and dating options.

    How many articles about learning to love being single and pleasuring yourself can a healthy young woman read before she thinks she should just enter a convent or slit her wrists??

  33. Candelaria wrote:

    There are lots of magazines going out of business today and it has as much to do as advertising dollars. If a magazine has 1 million+ subscribers, it is obviously relevant to a lot of people but that may not be enough to keep it in print.
    I haven’t subscribed in years but I do check them out when I get my “hair did.”
    While I think the rally-around this or that has gotten old, it has worked for good (Dance Theatre of Harlem) and for the price of a restaurant meal or two it is a worthwhile investment for those who are feeling it.

  34. A. wrote:

    The reason that I’d be sad to see Jet and Ebony Magazine go is because they (along with Essence) are among the very FEW magazines that even portray black PEOPLE in a decent light. No other magazine is willing to do this. Vibe is too concerned about catering to kids in suburbia, and Vibe Vixen is one of the worst excuses of stereotyping that I’ve seen in a long time.

    If we want change with these magazines, something has to happen – they will have to at least change their format, or at least hire a younger crowd of people. The reason neither one is seen as relevant is because they come off as being archaic. But, archaic or not, it’s one of the few magazines that we as black people even have that shows us with a remotely decent representation. At least the two of them can be fixed.

  35. msladydeborah wrote:

    I am from the generation of AA’s that read Ebony and Jet monthly. At that time it was our window to the world from our viewpoint. I would sit in an easy chair and read each publication from cover to cover.

    I can’t remember the last time that I have done that. I did buy an edition of Ebony after the election was over. It was added to my collection of historical artifacts.

    My cousin was a Jet centerfold back in the 1960’s. Her photo is classy-not trashy. Every member of our family had a copy of that edition.
    She was well represented in that photo. If it had come across otherwise-it would never have been submitted.

    I don’t know what should happen to these two publications. There is a glut of publications on the market. Many of them will not survive for different reasons. Perhaps it is time to put them to bed. Maybe not. But it seems to me that if they are going to survive then the staff had better start working extra hard to make their respective publications relevant.

  36. Kjen wrote:

    I think we should be mindful of the fact that Ebony and Jet remain relevant, just not relevant to readers of blogs like racialicious and the like. They are holding firm to representing “upright, dignified” Negroes of the more stoic, middle-class/working class mode with a traditional work and gender role ethic. I think of it as kind of the Tyler Perry of magazines. They just have to figure out a way to bundle and sell their audiences on the internet to more advertisers. Hmm, would Johnson’s ego allow for a “Tyler Perry Presents: Ebony Magazine”? With his continued rising poplarity and legitimency, it could work.

  37. c.n. edaw wrote:

    @Kjen. I agree that would be their current niche. However, I would say those people (my mom being one of them) would probably like to see some more incisive reporting and different angles or new takes on the things they deem important.

    You know the “Beauty of the Week” in Jet really doesn’t bother me near as much as most rap videos or most of the Hip Hop magazines.

    Actually, it might be a bit more progressive than we give it credit for. The women tend to reflect a pretty broad spectrum of skin tones within the AA community( something that cannot be said for most contemporary mags) & while most are not what the average black woman deems “plus size” there is certainly more latitude in size based on fashion industry standards as most appear to be sized6, 8 or 10 rather than 0 or 2 . The poses are actually pretty tame as compared to MAXIM or FHM. I also recall seeing far less hair weave on these women than in other publications.

  38. Miles Ellison wrote:

    The words “Tyler Perry” and “dignified” don’t belong in the same language, let alone the same sentence.

    Ebony and Jet do have to update their approach, though. It’s not enough just to be the only magazine where blacks can see people who look like them. That kind of attitude is part of their problem.

  39. sasha wrote:

    I hope Ebony, Jet and Essence stay around as magazines, or at least have a strong online presence. Everyone keeps saying that the magazines are not relevant anymore but no one is offering specific suggestions on how they can make themselves relevant. My grandmother has a subscription to Jet, so up until i moved a week ago I read Jet, and I think, while it is a good magazine it should go completely online. As far as Essence, they have a pretty good website, but maybe they could create a completely online zine aimed at young (18-30) working class/lower middle class black women who are trying to advance themselves.

  40. Hibbs4Prez wrote:

    I’m leaning towards not helping at all.

    First of all as plenty of folks have already mentioned the “journalism” in the Ebony (I’m not even going to get into Jet because I never took that digest seriously) is horrid. I understand that as a mag it can’t afford to compete with the mainstream mags and newspapers for the best black journalists, but is than any excuse for the uninformative, puff pieces it carries regularly? Couldn’t it at least have looked for fresh faces coming directly out of college who at least understood journalism? Let those graduates get some on the job experience before moving on to the big boys if that’s what they wanted and to do and were good enough? Maybe that’s too simplistic an idea but there has barely been a story from Ebony worthy of me keeping or reading over again.

    Next of all I have to say as a black man it does not speak to me at all. It seems to put the vast majority of its focus on attracting female readers. I guess I’m not part of a worthwhile demographic. In the early 90s I can recall an issue of Ebony in which the eveil Barbara Bush, the First Lady, was interviewed. The writer conducting the interview was a woman. She asked Bush all sort of questions and then, out of nowhere, asked Bush what famous black woman of history did she admire. I say out of nowhere because it wasn’t as if the the writer and the First Lady were discussing black women or even women in general. Anyway Mrs Bush said there wasn’t any black woman that came to mind but that she did admire Frederick Douglass. That should have been the end of it but the writer seemed taken aback that Mrs Bush did not come up with the name of a black woman. So she asked Mrs Bush again if there was a black woman in history that she admired and once again Mrs Bush politely came back with the response that while she couldm’t think of a woman, she was inspired by Frederick Douglass. And I thin k the journalist may have posed the question again!

    My problem with that particular part of the interview was that the writer could have easily just have asked “what black person” from history do you most admire. I can imagine that if an Asian woman working for an Asian magazine had the opportunity to ask Barbara Bush that question she would have asked Bush to given her any Asian person from history, sex of the person not being a factor. I could see a Hispanic woman doing the same thing. But of course the black lady from Ebony wanted to limit the answer to just black women. A true journalist accepts the response of Frederick Douglass and moves on. A writer with an agenda brings an interview to a halt though. If the writer and the First Lady had been talking about black women and women’s issues, then the question would have made sense. But those weren’t the topics of the Q & A.

    Stuff like that was just the start. As years went on I was, at times, unable to tell the difference between Ebonyand Essence in terms of its covers and high profile interviews. But I finally gave up altogether when one of the black male writers/columnists of the magazine wrote column in which he said black mothers should be excluded from any criticism concerning the health of the black community. Everyone else in society was at fault but “don’t blame mama” as he put it. It was ridiculous because no one is above criticism

  41. Anonymous wrote:

    What if they could maintain at least some presence online? Seems like they’d really have to amp it up, but I work for a magazine that’s constantly struggling financially myself and I can say for sure that printing/postage are by far our biggest expenses.

    That said—it’s hard to let print go. There’s just something about opening the mailbox and finding a new magazine (amongst all the bills). Despite their failure to keep up with the times, it’s still sad. Still something to mourn.

  42. Lola wrote:

    @BluTopaz

    I used to subscribe to Essence but dropped it for the very reasons you mentioned. It seemed too interested in tabloid reporting and encouraging black women to be desperate or hate black men.

  43. Lola wrote:

    @ Ada
    I recently dropped my subscription to Marie Claire because the only non white people were in the international women news story. One paparazzi pic of Rihanna does not count as diversity. The have a feature where the go to different cities and ask the women what their best feature is, 99% of the women they speak to are white.

  44. Tracey wrote:

    @c.n. edaw “Amazingly, no matter how much time had passed, no matter what the issue –the premise and conclusion of the articles were the same. However, I’m sure you could say the same thing about People or Cosmopolitan”.
    Precisely. I really would hate to see these magazines go, but they have been pretty lackluster when it comes to in depth reporting and changing up their coverage, substance, and format. I still read Jet and it is precisely the same as it was ten years ago. When I was ten I didn’t mind, but now, I kinda do. They do do some good reports from time to time,but those are rare and far in between ( I’m thinking of the one on the way the MSM ignores the disappearance of children of color).
    While there fluff pieces and spotlights on middle and upper class black social happenings might keep people coming to a website, they are not going to sell a magazine. I think to attract more readers they are really going to have to get serious. Discuss the black experience in small towns, discuss racism in certain institutions (lending, k-12 education, prison-industrial complex) and do it well. It’s amazing, but none of the interesting things I’ve read about black experiences in the last few years have been in these magazines. Having almost half of a magazine dedicated to social announcements and entertainment isn’t going to cut it anymore, and personally, I’m glad it won’t. While I still read them, I wouldn’t spend money on them. Also, I do hate that these mags are struggling but Cosmo isn’t, but I feel like as big a joke as Cosmo is it can somehow rake in the advertising dollars.
    @Kjen, yeah. However, part of me thinks even targeting the Perry crowd would buy a year or two at most b/c it might still mean rehashing the same stories (how to get a man, single and loving it, fashion icons, preachers, etc) but then again it is the stuff people can’t seem to get enough of. Steve Harvey’s new book (Act like a lady, think like a man) seems to be doing very well. But I still think it would need a strong online presence.
    @Miles Ellison :
    “The words “Tyler Perry” and “dignified” don’t belong in the same language, let alone the same sentence.” :: Extended bear hug::

  45. gottagoanonforthis wrote:

    I’ve freelanced at Johnson Publications in the past and I can honestly say that none of this shocks me. Any problems they have are of their own making, and it all starts at the top.

    An inability to want to evolve. An inability to listen to anyone who has ANY suggestions on how to make both Ebony and Jet into viable 21st century publications. Good, talented people who have only the company’s best interest at heart reduced to tears in the bathrooms because they are told (once again) that whatever they produced “just isn’t the Ebony/Jet/Fashion Fair way” and being told to produce the same things in the same style that was working 25+ years ago. Or even worse, being threatened with termination. I can go on and on but trust me, one post isn’t enough to cover all the fuckery.

    It’s really a shame because most of the people I had the honor of working with there are wonderfully talented individuals who have the misfortune of working in an environment where their creativity and ideas are COMPLETELY STIFLED and shat upon on a daily basis. Here’s hoping they land on their feet and work at a place that really appreciates and makes good use of their talent.

  46. Tori wrote:

    “It’s really a shame because most of the people I had the honor of working with there are wonderfully talented individuals who have the misfortune of working in an environment where their creativity and ideas are COMPLETELY STIFLED and shat upon on a daily basis. Here’s hoping they land on their feet and work at a place that really appreciates and makes good use of their talent.”

    Or let’s hope these people band together and start their own magazine. Like I said in my post above something else will rise in its place. Maybe we should all band together and start our own. It sounds like we have the makings of an editorial board right here.

  47. Winn wrote:

    Most of you have expresssed my exact sentiments already, especially Dee Galloway (slow hand clap for your post). I grew up with both Ebony and Jet, and while I can appreciate the historical role both publications played in the narrative and public discourse of the black community, they both lost their prime status years ago. While they might be able to reinvent themselves to recapture relevance, I think the reinvention required would be radical enough that neither would be recognizable as “Ebony” or “Jet”. If a print magazine is still the goal (and I am unconvinced why it would be given the dire economic tidings for many print publications, especially those with specialized or niche audiences), then perhaps a merging and updating of the two publications would breathe new life into them. Otherwise, I say let them go the way of the dodo. Their historic role and ubiquity in the black community in an earlier time cannot be denied, but if they fail to speak to the complexity, diversity and fluidity of the contemporary community, then whose fault is that?

    I don’t like the idea implicit in the entreaty included in the OP that we “owe” these publications something. People of color too often cling to outmoded or even damaging modes of expression because of nostalgia, tradition, or because there are limited representations of us in the public square. But gone are the days that I scan the back of Jet to see what black people are on TV this week. Gone are the days that amateurish, mediocre writing, lazy, inert editing and insubstantial, narrowly focused topics passed for journalism and perspective in my house. Now we can demand more, and at least have other venues open to us to explore, discuss, lament and brainstorm about what has changed, what has remained stagnant, and how to go about pushing for the increased diversity and representation we seek. Unless “Ebony” and “Jet” can be marshalled into that fight, instead of trading on tradition and sentimentality to stay above the fray, then I won’t exactly shed tears if either or both publications fold.

  48. Rob wrote:

    You know what? I’m gay, and Ebony and Jet and Essence have gone the way of most publications/organizations/etc. that claim to represent the “black community” and decided that I don’t exist. I work in the media industry and get more free magazines than I could ever possibly read, and I have seen these magazines and flipped through them from time to time, but I never see anything of any substance and certainly nothing I didn’t already know. Will and Jada have the perfect marriage? You don’t say. Tyler Perry is still looking for the “right” woman? Keep on looking, brotha (and how YOU doin’?). I’m sorry, but these magazines bore the hell out of me, and I feel like they talk down to their intended audience of middle-class black folks by not taking on controversial topics or ever doing anything real. There are too many interesting things going on online today to even bother.

  49. April wrote:

    Just because Ebony and Jet don’t suit your tastes doesn’t mean those publications are worthless. Although Jet could be more up-to-date, given it’s a weekly, I’ve found that many of its stories about community leaders wouldn’t get ink in most other magazines. I think it’s quite useful as a way to keep up to date on the “who’s who” of the black community–and that’s valuable, seeing that too many young black Americans are growing up now thinking that their only “community leaders” are rappers and athletes.

    On the other hand, both publications need to improve editorially: in their journalism and in their quality of writing. An article in the March issue of Ebony about a black Irish singer, Laura Izibor, attempted to draw a contrast between her soulful repertoire and that of other (white) Irish artists through the following statement:

    “This Dubliner is not singing about leprechauns, but more about life.”

    I think I laughed at that sentence for at least three minutes.

  50. Ada wrote:

    @Lola and A.D. Nix:
    I generally don’t read too women’s magazines because they always recycle their fashion, but I really like MC’s articles, I wasn’t referring to the diversity element. I guess I’ve learned to ignore it, unfortunately. We must not get complacent.

    For your daughters, I know Seventeen has gotten loads better at diversity especially in their fashion and makeup articles (they even include styling tips for relaxed hair although that doesn’t help my braided, natural hair), but I quit them the year they put Hilary Duff, The Hilton sisters, and Lindsay Lohan on the cover in the same year. Ick.

  51. eb wrote:

    actually, i think the mag’s gotten better in the last two years than it has in the last 15… i remember when they said that they were hiring new people. and i remember reading somewhere – recently – about their reorganization. so seems as tho someone there is up on the need to change things.

    it IS better than it was… but my girl freelances for them and says the same as the person up a above me: there are talented folks there, but the old ways are slow to part.

    i’m guessing those talented folks are waiting until their managers get fired. from what i understand, even changing a font type there is like turning the titanic.

    but here’s something.. if celebs aren’t on the cover, wil the mag sell?i think it’s an interesting question… do you all buy American legacy? and is it profitable? i’m sure it doesn’t have the same readershio that ebony does.

    i checked folio mag and folio says ebony has about 1.7-million readers a month.
    so since they’re still here, something’s not computing…. either their readers don’t read this blog, or their readers are a whole different niche.

  52. jannie hixon wrote:

    Please don’t forget how important Ebony and Jet has been there for us when we had no other magazine. We need to support them 100%. I be there with my contribution anytime. Black people wake up and let support each others.

  53. russ wrote:

    so… i went ahead and bought one, to check it out. beyonce’s pix are sexy. never seen her lookin like that before. read a little somethin about that new tv show i saw last week, Kings. Surprised to see that story up in there.

    not too keen on green jobs, but that’s prolly cause i already got my job. and, didn’t know that a black dude was a gold medal swimmer. where was i when that happened last year?

    all in all, it was ok. nothing hyper intellectual, but nothing stupid either. does it move me? eh… sorta kinda… i’d get it again, only bc i got got kids and it is nice to have something that they can read along with me. they still don’t get a lot of positive images of themselves unless me and the wifey give it to them.

  54. brownstocking wrote:

    I intentionally stopped reading Ebony and Essence years ago, but it saddens me that we don’t have anything in print that can reach a diverse audience of color. Emerge was the bomb for a while, then folks started tweaking, then Savoy happened. Ugh.

    My mom still subscribes to Ebony, because of the idea of loyalty and history, and, while I support her in that, I’m not the one. The quality of writing has deteriorated severly, and some of the graphics look like high school students have done the layout and Photoshopped the heck out of some ads.

    Do we actually have the interest to start a either a replacement for Ebony or a new mag? Because I’ll subscribe. I even tried to support b Smith’s mag, but it folded quickly. Heck, we need something for the salon and auto repair waiting room!!!

  55. Nik wrote:

    I used to love sitting in my aunts bathroom and reading the hundred thousand issues of jet magazine that she had. I dont know why. I just loved Jet. I found out you can look at the entire magazine going all the way back to the 50’s here on google books.

    http://books.google.com/books?id=IUMDAAAAMBAJ&hl=En&source=gbs_all_issues_r&cad=2_2

    Its interesting looking at the articles and the movie stars and singers and news from back then.

  56. Benjamin Parks wrote:

    There’s no denying that Ebony and Jet appear to have worked really hard to become totally irrelevant to a great deal of modern black life. This doesn’t matter in the larger sense because no new brand, no new black magazine, can lay claim to the legacy of the names Ebony and Jet.
    These we must somehow preserve.

    Unlike members of the larger society, we don’t have the luxury provided by having thousands of publication from which to choose and can therefore ignore the impact of some of them becoming defunct. Ebony and Jet are a vital part of our history and they provide a unique continuum stretching back to times and events of great import. We simply cannot afford to stand by and allow them to fail.

    In spite of their reluctance to change, they’ll have no choice. The old guard will pass on and a new group with new ideas will update and change to tone of these venerable old publications. Such is inevitable.

    We must encourage people to subscribe because higher subscription rates translate into more solid advertising numbers. And inevitably, Ebony and Jet must become more modern because they’ll have no alternative if they wish to reach the demographic vital to their survival.

    Younger black folk should not be lulled into a false sense of security by the great number of black publications currently available, historical connections are important. White folks sure thinks so, they spend billions on the preservation of their heritage. Let us resist the temptation to be so cavalier in casting ours aside.
    The old stick-in-the-mud crew in charge at Johnson Publications will not live forever and we can count on a new group with a new vision to arise and ensure that these two pubications regain the relevance. Meanwhile, we need to ensure that they continue to exist until that time comes.

  57. its me wrote:

    Ebony & Jet is a part of our community. It is a part of our history. Linda Johnson Rice sent out a request asking people what would do to change the magazines, what would you like to see. She listened and she changed. So if you haven’t read Ebony or Jet in 10 years, you haven’t read Ebony or Jet. To insult the publication without ever sending in a comment or a suggestion is like doing a research paper without doing the research. The Johnson’s contribute big dollars to education, medical causes, libraries, charities, various organization that benefit the Black Community. They are a vital part of our heritage and our community. When white america told John H. Johnson “NO”, Mr. Johnson did not give up. He started his magazine on $500 and kept building on it ever since. He bought the building on Michigan Ave where Johnson Publishing Company is located. He was an exemplary example of hard work and determination. Mrs. Johnson worked with him and together Ebony Fashion Fair was born and then Fashion Fair Cosmetics. All are in trouble right now. As successful as the Ebony Fashion Fair tour is, one can’t survive without the other. Stop ripping apart the company that was the only way many blacks had to know what was really happening in our communities. Mr. Johnson wrote and published the articles without fear and hesitation. Rich or not, I am thankful I can get some truth from the Ebony and Jet Magazines and not some lie that was published in a white paper. History and then future. I really believe they have weathered the test of time, and changed with the time. President Obama granted the first interview to Ebony Magazine after he won the election and again after he took office. We are so quick to throw stones and invest in Vogue versus our own magazines. Essence is no longer black owned. Enterprise, Ebony & Jet are still 100% black owned businesses. That is something for us to be proud of, don’t want to help by purchasing a subscription, a ticket to the show, or even some make up that’s up to you but don’t knock one of the few pure businesses that is still Black Owned. If this doesn’t pertain to you then understand where I am coming from. If it does you know how to use the internet, google the facts and don’t listen to hearsay or make it up as you go. God Bless the Johnson’s and all of us. May we all survive this perilous economy.

  58. Mary wrote:

    Jet magazine is hardly a magazine at so few pages…I am not happy that husband subcribed and the cost is $199. Has anyone noticed how thin it is lately?

  59. Mike wrote:

    “We are so quick to throw stones and invest in Vogue versus our own magazines.”

    Well said.

    Ebony should be humble enough to embrace change and reinvent their archaic ways quickly. We as a people should support them because of their track record of positive reflection on the black community.

    My two cents….

  60. Ebony Priestess wrote:

    I am much older than you GenXers and as I am reading your posts of letting Ebony and Jet go, I am reminded of how much community, sisterhood, and brotherhood we had before the civil rights movement. We had whole communtites that offered us our own businesses, schools, lodges and whatnot. It seemed that the victory of the civil rights movement gave us access to what was formerly “white only.” In so accessing, we let our own villages and communities die. We no longer supported what was our own. Those of us that were afforded opportunities as a result of affirmative action moved on up and out. We left our communities without a lifeline. We let them die. As a result of such, we see our young people in the inner cities killing each other, disrepecting their elders, shunning education. Yes, I’ll say it, all the thing Bill Cosby talked about. But what we don’t talk about is black flight from the inner cities to join someone else’s community instead of making our own better. Now we have nothing, although we pretend we do. Ebony and Jet are far from perfect, but it is all we have. Instead of letting it go, let’s persuade Johnson Publishing to make them better. We’ve lost enough of ourselves. God bless and keep you all.

  61. PEGGY COTTON HORTON wrote:

    ALL PRAISES TO THE ALMIGHTY CREATOR

    I WAS A JET MAGAZINE SALES GIRL AT 10 YRS OLD, SELLING IT IN BRONZEVILLE THROUGH A DI STRIBUTOR, TINY SHOE REPAIR SHOP ON 35TH STREET BETWEEN WABASH AND STATE. AT THAT TIME JETS WERE 15 CENTS. WE GOT 5 CENT OFF EACH JET WE SOLD.

    I WOULD BE AGREEABLE AND SUPPORTIVE TO THE SUBSCRIPTION DRIVE PARTY.

    LOOK AT THE STREETWISE ORGANIZATION HOW THEY PUT THE WORD OUT ABOUT FINANCIAL TROUBLE, WENT ON CLIFF KELLEY ,WVON AND OTHER OUTLETS TO GET HELP AND WHAT THEY HAD ASKED FOR TO KEEP GOING AND THEY GOT DONATIONS OVER THE AMOUNT.

    KEEP THE FAITH

  62. sam wrote:

    I have hundreds of copies of both jet & ebony. I was a kid when I first read a copy. I’m 41 now & still buys both copies. I hope that the management will be able to keep these magazines alive. Pehaps they can make head lines by going to small towns like mine in Williamston, NC. and interview the community leaders and residents. You must be able to start direct diologues and get a new following for publications. Keep America reading.

  63. Connie wrote:

    Print media is swiftly becoming obsolete. This publication was relevant at a very turbulent time in our struggle, but the audience has to be reached in cyberspace to remain competitive.
    Sad but true!

  64. Winston wrote:

    Ebony and Jet shot themselves in both feet when they refused to evolve with the temperment of POC. I’m not talking about Hip-Hop, I talking about producing strong articles that dealt with challenging the minds of its black readers instead of always trying to entertain them with soap opera stories.

  65. yous2Bthere wrote:

    the bloggers who worked there or know someone who used to work there understand why this magazine is failing: old ways.

    i remember when i first arrived to work at JPC. they had assigned lunchroom seating, they had a dictatorial upper management and one person in particular had a VERY BAD reputation for disrespecting employees and actually yelling and cursing at them. yes, many employees were brought to tears. it never happened to me, but I was amazed at how much most of the people who worked there were willing to take just to say they worked there.

    there have been many people who have come and gone through JPC with good ideas, but their ideas were never heard or they were too afraid (yes afraid) to present them for fear of how “Mr. Johnson” might react.

    when you study some of EBONY’s earliest publications, you will see that the magazine was very outspoken on a lot of issues pertaining to blacks. EBONY was REVOLUTIONARY back then.

    as time went by, you saw the magazine leaning AWAY from WAKE-UP and TRUTH-TELLING articles and focusing more on which star has the best house, who just lost 200 pounds and so on. also, it was hard to get EBONY higher-ups to allow articles about “regular (but still extraordinary) black folks.” if the article wasn’t about a star or wasn’t a friend or family member of someone “important,” it was like pulling teeth.

    once, i tried to get a story about a black woman approved (i won’t say what it was about) and the editors shot down the idea quickly. but when i told them that 60 minutes had just done a story about the woman, all of the sudden they were willing to fly me out for an interview. (hmmm. a black publication with white standards of journalism?)

    i think, as the magazine grew older and more accepted, some there felt that they needed to appeal more to advertisers instead of educating blacks, which was once their primary mission. so that’s what they have been doing for decades, and that is why blacks no longer feel that magazine has kept up with the times.

    many of the stories on black stars are just publicity pieces that care little about telling the truth. blacks who read EBONY along with other publications see that white-owned publications usually get to the bottom of the news, while EBONY almost always acts as a black star’s official publicist.

    i feel that magazine could have been saved if the changes they are attempting to make now had been implemented ten years ago, when the ecconomy was stable. they should have long ago let go of those overpaid and catered to EBONY editors who had worked there since the 70s and who had little other journalistm experience elsewhere before coming to EBONY. they should have brought in new blood long ago and allowed the journalists to write about issues blacks want to read about.

    but employees who tried to give “Mr. Johnson” advice knew how that would end up, so that is why the magazine continued to look like it was designed by someone still wearing an Afro, platform shoes and bellbottoms.

    unlike other newsrooms where journalists have computers and can send their stories to their editors for editing, EBONY was still using TYPEWRITERS up until 1991!

    and journalists who learned how to write using AP (Associated Press) guidelines quickly learned that at EBONY, there was no AP way. there was only the EBONY/”MR. Johnson” WAY.

    sad to see such an important publication go, but, based on the news reports that i’ve read about EBONY and the already horrible climate for the print meda, EBONY is drowing fast and may not survive.

    getting people to take out subscriptions won’t save it, because as an earlier post noted, it’s the ADVERTISING dollars that keep publications alive. Advertisers leave if they feel that a publication no longer represents their target audience.

  66. Henry 26 wrote:

    Okay for real we need to save this b/c when they’re gone, what media do we have that actually SHOWCASES BLACK ACTORS ALOT. I heard about this yesterday May 26th and bought a jet magazine to support. I looked thropugh it and noticed SOO MANY BLACK ACTORS that I’d never see in mainstream magazines. You might call them B actors. If we lose these two magazines they’ll loose publicity! We can’t afford to lose stuff if we want equality. I look through the grocery stores and these two magazines (also Essence) are the only magazines I can count on that will have a Black person on the cover that actually has dark skin. These other magazines still do the paper bag test unfortunately. Besides for our generation and kids to come they need to see all types of black is beautiful and their is diversity (not everyone has to speak well or speak Broken English/Ebonics/ghetto/etc. Show diversity. So I say support the magazines and the magazines need to have GOOD RARE FACTS ABOUT ARTISTS/ACTORS that you can’t just look up on the internet already (that’s where most magazines are these days, why pay if you can get it online for free) Have exclusive news. (Doesn’t ahve to be who you’re dating, but for an artist say Beyonce, ask her where the “Single Ladies” video was filmed, how many dancers auditioned, who came up with the hairstyle or costume ,etc rare stuff) that’s what they did in the 80s. If you don’t have unique stuff you’ll surely lose my subscription, and maybe try to get different advertisers and just have standards for them to follow (maybe a small independent black cartoon company has to make a classier picture to use for ads, that’s still money) and dag get new people on the covers, I know it’s about money but dag I don’t wanna see the same 12 people on the cover every year. Or at least do like some magazines and have another person on the back and have a couple of pages

  67. memyselfandi wrote:

    I hate to sound elitist, but we didn’t have Jet or Ebony in our home because they were so poorly written, especially Jet. Even as a kid I could always find mispelled words, grammatical errors, and incorrect syntax. And the people they profiled never looked like me. The women were all lighter and brighter with cascading ringlets down their backs, especially the brides.

    My aunt usually had a copy of Jet in her beauty shop and I would read it as I waited to get my hair fried. I recently picked up a Jet and did the same thing the writer did and opened it up to the center page. Yup, there she was! Miss Black Beauty. That just brought back a horde of unpleasant memories.