How to Write about Muslims (for real)

by Guest Contributors Sobia and Krista, originally published at Muslimah Media Watch

After getting all of that sarcasm out of our systems two weeks ago, we decided it might be useful to put together a list of actual guidelines for writing about Muslims. Of course, this is mostly just wishful thinking, because if reporters actually seemed willing to adhere to guidelines like this, then there would be no need for this blog. But here are some suggestions anyway.

A lot of this isn’t new stuff, as you’ll see from the many MMW posts that we link to, which illustrate some of our guidelines in more detail.

So, here you go: the shockingly un-sarcastic version of “How to Write About Muslims.”

Rule #1: Don’t assume that Muslim women need to be saved, or that you know how to save them.

By making this assumption, what one is essentially doing is:

    * Assuming that all Muslim women are somehow oppressed at the hands of their fellow Muslims. The Muslim community is just as diverse as any other. By generalizing in such a way, one maligns the entire community, including the women. This is offensive to the many women who are treated with respect and equality by their fellow Muslims, including Muslim men. This assumption also ignores the forms of oppression that Muslim women may be facing from outside of the Muslim community, such as racism and Islamophobia (or even war and occupation, in cases like Iraq and Afghanistan), which for some women can be much more disastrous than anything they experience from their Muslim community.
    * Assuming that Muslim women can’t take care of themselves. This is very patronizing. Muslim women have agency, and a great deal of it. Throughout history and today, Muslim women have been taking various forms of leadership. In situations where women are being oppressed, they are resisting in all sort of ways that the media doesn’t always think about. Additionally, most Muslim countries have Muslim women’s organizations that are working hard to support themselves and other women.
    * Assuming that what you’re going to do for them is going to be helpful. The assumption is that you know better than them what’s good for them. It also suggests that you are actually in a position to help them, which might not be true.

These two posts by Faith go into more detail about what is wrong with making these assumptions.

Rule #2:Rather than assuming you know what Muslim women’s lives are like, try asking them.

Too often, writers write about Muslim women without ever having tried to find out what Muslim women’s lives are like from their perspective. This is poor research, and feeds into the problematic assumptions discussed in Rule #1. Do your homework, and try hard to connect to the specific women that you are writing about. Even if you are writing about women in another country, try to connect to women’s organisations in that country. At the very least, try to connect to women from that country who are living in your own community.

Rule #3: Be careful of who you talk to regarding Islam and/or Muslim women.

Don’t assume, just because someone is Muslim, that all Muslims will agree with them or that they represent all Muslims. For example, Muslims who have made a career out of calling other Muslims Islamists, and who base their credibility on the number of other Muslims who don’t like them, are not a good source of information. Generally, people who work within an Islamic framework, as opposed to always bashing Islam, are more likely to understand the Muslim community.

If you’re looking for information on Islam and Muslims, works by the following people might be of interest: Dr. Jasmin Zine, Dr. Asifa Quraishi (discussed here on MMW), Dr. Amina Wadud, Dr. Asma Barlas, Dr. Tariq Ramadan, and Imam Shabbir Ally. (Note that neither we nor MMW necessarily endorses everything that any of these people say. See also the comment section of this post for some more suggestions of people who can represent Muslims.)

Rule #4: Understand that Muslims are just like anyone else in terms of their belief systems. Not everything a Muslim does has to do with Islam.

Although Islam may play an important role in the lives of many Muslims, this does not mean that every action a Muslim takes, good or bad, is related to his/her religion. Believing everything a Muslim does must be related to Islam is the same as believing that everything a Christian, Jew, Hindu, or Sikh does is related to their religions. As irrational and nonsensical as this seems for these religious groups, it should seem equally as nonsensical to apply this belief to Muslims. Muslims, just like all other people, are impacted and influenced by many aspects of their contexts – culture, economy, employment, relationships, health, etc. The ways in which Muslims behave, just like the ways in which all people behave, are influenced by the many experiences in our lives, just one of which is religion. To assume that a Muslim’s behaviour is based on his/her religion alone is assuming that Muslims live in a vacuum which is devoid of culture, economy, patriarchy, social problems, health issues, etc. Here is an example of taking Muslims out of their context and blaming Islam for their behaviour.

Rule #5: Understand that there is no such thing as a “Muslim culture.” Muslims come from a variety of cultures, and culture is dynamic – it’s constantly changing.

Muslim culture does not exist. There is no one region of the world from which Muslims hail. Don’t take our word for it. Ask any researcher in cross-cultural studies (psychology, sociology, etc) and they will tell you that a Muslim culture does not exist.

Muslims hail from a variety of different cultures. Researchers also say that culture is a dynamic phenomenon. Every culture is dynamic and is constantly changing. Hence, the cultures from which Muslims hail are also changing. What may have happened in a culture 50 years ago, may not necessarily happen today. And just like North American culture, cultures around the world, are diverse. People of various cultures are not blindly following their cultures. Just as North Americans are not drones acting in ways dictated to them by their culture, similarly Muslims do not mindlessly follow their respective cultures.

Rule #6: Don’t create a dichotomy between “Muslim” and “Canadian” (or “American,” “British,” etc.), or between “Muslim” and “Western.”

See here for one example of why this is problematic. There are a lot of Muslims who also identify as Western, Canadian, American, and so on. Talking about Canadians and Muslims as if the categories are mutually exclusive reinforces the idea of an irreconcilable divide between Islam and the West, and erases the identities of the many Muslims who feel connected to both categories.

Rule #7: Tone it down! Be mindful of the language you use.

Language is a powerful tool that can shape people’s perceptions, and can have far-reaching implications for the way that people are seen. For example, last week we had a discussion about the ways that terms like “honour killing” and “terrorist” are being used in relation to the recent murder of Aasiya Hassan (and see here and here for other discussions on the term “honour killing.”) Terms like these can easily be used to portray all Muslims (and the cultures that Muslims are assumed to come from) as violent, scary, oppressed, dangerous, and so on. It’s useful for fearmongering, but often antithetical to responsible journalism.

And please, please stop trying to make up clever titles involving some play on the word “veil.” It’s been done. Ad nauseum. (See Rule #9.)

Rule #8: Take responsibility for the consequences of your writing.

If you do decide to write in ways that seem to generalize, patronize, insult, or demonize a whole group of people then take responsibility for your words and realize that people will be offended and upset. Do not be surprised when people feel insulted, demonized, or patronized by your words. And do not be surprised when they critique it on blogs, or write seething letters to the editor.

Rule #9: Leave the headscarf alone.

The headscarf is really not a big issue for a lot of Muslim women. And most Muslim women would really appreciate it if the media would figure this out soon. Muslim women wear or don’t wear the headscarf for a variety of reasons. Many Muslim women who wear the headscarf believe it is their religous obligation, while others wear it to increase their spirituality, while others wear it as an expression of their modesty, while others wear it for political reasons, and others still for all of the above. Many Muslim also do not wear the hijab because they feel it is not a religious obligation. Whatever their beliefs may be, for Muslim women the headscarf is a personal and private choice. A choice they have the right and ability to make. By assuming that the headscarf is somehow problematic, one undermines the agency of the women who have chosen to either wear or not wear the headscarf.

Even for women who are in situations where headscarves are imposed, they are probably having lots of other things imposed on them too. The obsessive and often exclusive focus on the scarf is still reductive and misses the point.

Really, it’s getting old. Give it a rest.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. “How to Write About Muslims” on Racialicious « Sobia Ali on 03 Apr 2009 at 3:53 pm

    [...] March 13, 2009 Our piece on how to really write about Muslims, originally published on MMW, was also posted on Racialicious. [...]

Comments

  1. Ugly Deaf Muslim Punk Gurl! wrote:

    number 1 is the most true of all, I hate the tone of snide in articles written by non-Muslim Westerners, especially Western non-Muslim feminist women who think that they’re the “upholders of truth and justice” and they MUST save poor oppressed Muslim women!

  2. Ugly Deaf Muslim Punk Gurl! wrote:

    and yes, give the Hijab issue a goddamned rest. Nobody GIVES a shit if a woman wears a hijab or not! I used to wear it for 3 years and nobody, except 2 or 3 redneck morons, asked me or bothered me about the scarf. Get the fuck over it.

  3. Rchoudh wrote:

    Great post that sums up everything American MSM focuses on if and when it discusses about Muslims! It’s like they stick to following a specific meme everytime they want to report on Muslims.

  4. MeowKun wrote:

    Yea, I don’t get the whole deal about the veil/headscarf worn by Muslimahs too. No one talk about wedding veils, communion veil, Coco Chanel style headscarf or babushka style headscarf that ethusiasticially.
    Besides, I know that in some Christian Orthodox churches require women to cover their hair while inside the church too. Why no one had problem about it (compared to say hijab for that matter)?!

  5. Mahsino wrote:

    Great post, while reading this, it occurred to me that perhaps this is could probably serve as a guide to the tone the media needs to take when addressing any culture that isn’t it’s own.

  6. Meg wrote:

    The headscarf obsession drives me batty. I over my hair with scarves, though not in the hijab style. To me, it’s not a big deal. It’s just part of getting dressed in the morning.

  7. The Cruel Secretary wrote:

    Sobia and Krista–

    I’m chiming in with some of the other commenters: this is a great post, and the sarcastic one on MMW is just brilliant.

  8. luckyfatima wrote:

    Ah #4, geeze this one trips people up all of the time…like “I can’t believe there are transvestites in Pakistan, how do those daft, narrow, fire and brim stone Pakistanis allow it? Isn’t it hypocritical?!?!” (I read something similar online somewhere recently) or the freakin non-Muslim honorary Mutawwa’ or Pasdaran “Oh those women who wear face veils and loads of eyeliner are so hypocritical,” “I heard women in abayas wear sexy lingerie underneath,” and blah blah blah usually focused on women’s appearance, sexuality and veiling. Because they expect everything Muslims to do to be within Islam and they are allowing very narrow interpretations of Islam that they have usually read about in a negative light (like Western newspaper focus on Saudi or Taliban or something) to define Islam, and they are applying that understanding of Islam to niqaabis and eyeliner and so forth. Get over it!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAH!

  9. Fiqah wrote:

    Kind of a related aside…has anyone else read Malek Alloula’s “The Colonial Harem”? It’s an exploration of colonial postcards and the commodification of Algerian womens’ bodies. It’s kinda old and definitely has some overtones that today would be identified as sexist, but I am struck each time these tired ole Orientalist sentiments keep resurfacing by how relevant it still is. Alloula focuses particularly on how the presence of the “veil” (<–general terminology) frustrated the (male) colonial-imperialist gaze. It was written a loooooong time ago, but I often feel like that still applies. Anyway…I gotta quit coming around here suggesting books and derailing threads. Great post, ladies.

  10. vgirl wrote:

    Any chance we could get a cheat sheet like this for other ethnic/religious/cultural groups?

  11. Travis Hedge Coke wrote:

    “Don’t assume that Muslim women need to be saved, or that you know how to save them.”

    Someone I quite like, personally, and in many ways respect spent an inordinate portion of a novel trying to do this. I know I wasn’t the only reader who wasn’t convinced.

    I realize straight White American Christians will save us all (unless, Hollywood has lied to me), but this sort of human-for-group synecdoche should just be retired.

  12. Zahra wrote:

    Great post!

  13. Travis Hedge Coke wrote:

    @ vgirl, you can pretty much just replace “Muslim” with the necessary term. Most of these apply pretty directly.

  14. Rchoudh wrote:

    @ Fiqah

    Thanks for mentioning this book. I’ll be sure to check it out if I ever get the time. And you’re right these old Orientalist concepts are still alive and well except for one notion which is that during colonial times Muslim women were viewed as being sexual deviants (much like other non-European women around the world)back then. Now the complete opposite is true where Muslim women are viewed today as being frigid and sexually oppressed.

  15. Joseph wrote:

    @Sobia & Krista
    I’ll echo what I said when I read this at MMW: brilliant. This should be bookmarked and referenced by anyone trying to write about women and Islam. I hope it gets passed along for that purpose.

    @Fiqah
    Cosign on Alloula’s Colonial Harem. In the intro Barbara Harlow writes, “The postcards…no longer represent Algeria and the Algerian woman but rather the Frenchman’s phantasm of the Oriental female and her inaccessibility behind the veil in the forbidden harem” (Alloula 1986: xiv). Great book.

  16. krista wrote:

    Thanks everyone!

    @ luckyfatima: LOL at “the freakin non-Muslim honorary Mutawwa’”

    @ Fiqah: I definitely agree about Alloula. For anyone who’s interested, Meyda Yegenoglu’s work (while dense at times) also has a lot of good insights about gender and Orientalism, again with a focus on constructions of the “veil.” (She’s talked about Alloula’s book too.)

  17. sk wrote:

    Comment #2 : “….2 0r 3 redneck morons”
    I think “redneck” sounds offensive. We all need to be careful with our language.

    I find it very difficult to listen to people saying “That’s retarded” to describe just about anything, from a bad movie to a person’s actions. I wonder how many people with cognitive delays have had to listen to others saying “That’s retarded”. Makes me cringe.

    This is a much-needed post; I hope many many people read it.

  18. Jamerican Muslimah wrote:

    @luckyfatima,

    I am TOTALLY with you. I wonder if people even realize that they’re issuing the same kind of judgments/condemnations people like the Taliban and other extremist groups issue when they make comments like that.

  19. Onely wrote:

    “Rule #4: . . . . Not everything a Muslim does has to do with Islam.”

    THANK YOU!!!! This one drives me *nuts*–not necessarily just in relation to Muslims, but to anyone. To give a banal example, a (former) friend of mine once thanked a mutual German friend of ours for making her a handmade notebook, saying “The Germans really like to make things, huh.” ARGH! I have been the recipient of this kind of phrasing myself, and it irks me.

    Also, I was thinking that another possible rule could be, “Learn the proper usage of Jihad”, of course, that being “struggle” and not (necessarily) “violent struggle.” I think that there’s another Arabic word that actually means “violent struggle”, but I can’t remember what it is (begins with a “b”?)! I can’t remember it BECAUSE NO ONE EVER USES IT! But I think they should. That would be better journalism.
    –Christina at Onely

  20. Abu Sinan wrote:

    Good stuff. As a Muslim it is sad to note that a lot of the issues we have are from well intentioned liberals who think they are helping us out.

    I think there is precious little difference between a religious extremist who labels a woman for NOT wearing a hijab than there is with those who call themselves progressive and label women who choose TO wear the hijab.

    Both groups presume to be able to attack women for a personal choice they should be able to make for themselves, free from worrying about attacks from the left or the right.

    Personally the whole thing about hijab bores me to tears. I’d much rather talk about American support for dictators in the Muslim world and what is does to the opinions of us in these countries. Why do we support Honsni Mubarak? Why do we support the al Saud family?

  21. Fiqah wrote:

    @Rchoudh: It’s an awesome work, totally worth looking into.
    @Joseph: Yay, someone else knows what the hell my too-enthusiastic ass is rambling about. Thread validation! :)
    @krista: Oooohhh, something new to read. Fabulous. Thank you so very much for the tip!

  22. gatamala wrote:

    passing this one around!

  23. 9jah wrote:

    It irks to no end how preumptuous people are with respect to others, good intentions sometimes notwithstanding. Its no more a big deal to me if I go to the middle east and see people wrapped up than if I go to Brazil (or even Miami) and see everyone half way naked.

  24. Sobia wrote:

    I had typed up a comment yesterday but then when I was about to post my internet went all stupid on me and I lost it. So after being frustrated for a while I’m trying again now.

    First of all, thanks to everyone for the positive feedback!

    @UDMPG:
    I can totally understand your frustration but I would have to say that there are some Western non-Muslim feminists who are our allies and do not have a saviour complex. So I feel very uncomfortable generalizing about them. I have known some very sympathetic ones.

    @vgirl:

    I would agree with Travis Hedge Coke. You could probably just replace many of these with other minorities. However, there will definitely still be many rules that will be specific and unique to different minorities. Although many of us face the same struggles we also cannot deny that, because of our different histories, we will face at least a few unique ones.

    @Abu Sinan:

    I am completely bored with the hijab thing as well. Its at a point now that if I see it covered in a news story (which stupidly is a lot) I just roll my eyes and think “Seriously?? Do they have NOTHING else to write about? Nothing??” It’s getting so incredibly old. So old.

    @gatamala:

    Thanks! Please do!!

  25. poettree wrote:

    Rule #10: Don’t assume that all Muslims are Arabs, or all Arabs are Muslims.

  26. Butters wrote:

    Good article.

    I have linked to it in my journal.