Links – 2008-02-12

Compiled by Latoya Peterson and Fatemeh Fakhraie

Two items involving the KKK to lead this off. First, over at Rachel’s Tavern, Rachel posts a video of Klu Klux Klan member Owen Wilson discussing his apology to congressman John Lewis.

In two steps back news, Renee brings word that PeTA has decided to dress up like Klan members to protest the AKC.

Does this outfit remind you of anything? PETA will stop at nothing to push its agenda no matter who it marginalizes, no matter who it hurts.

The associated press reports,

    “Crowds gawked at a table set up outside Madison Square Garden on Monday afternoon, where People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals was protesting the start of the Westminster Kennel Club show. PETA contends that the American Kennel Club promotes pure-breeding of dogs that is harmful to their health.
    “Welcome AKC Members,” read a banner hanging from the table — with AKC crossed out and KKK written above it. Two PETA protesters dressed as Ku Klux Klan members, while other volunteers handed out brochures that read: “The KKK and the AKC: BFF?”
    “Obviously it’s an uncomfortable comparison,” PETA spokesman Michael McGraw said.
    But the AKC is trying to create a “master race,” he added. “It’s a very apt comparison.”

The amount of insensitivity it takes to dress up like the KKK and attempt to draw a link between the breeding of animals to the terror that blacks have lived with for generations can only be described as the audacity of whiteness.

Middle East Online reviews The Uncultured Wars: Arabs, Muslims, and the Poverty of Liberal Thought, by Steven Salaita, which looks at anti-Arab racism in American liberal media.

Loretta Ross writes about the Hyde Amendment, which disproportionally affects poorer women and often women of color:

As an organization that represents both pro-life and pro-choice women of color, SisterSong believes that poor women should have the same rights and access as middle class women in making decisions about our bodies. But the Hyde Amendment and other federal rules prohibit federal funding for abortion services for poor women on Medicaid, for Native American women in the Indian Health Services, for women in the military and in the Peace Corps. As a first step, the Hyde Amendment should be repealed — immediately!

Oh brave new world… Erykah Badu and Jay Electronica twittered the birth of their baby. (Please do not disrespect Erykah’s Queendom in the comments. Word to OK Player.) (Via.)

The Washington Post has an interesting graphic called “The Red, the Blue, and the Gray” comparing Obama and McCain wins to Confederate and Union States.

But there is another striking parallel: Obama carried every state that Lincoln won 148 years earlier — and the percentage of the white vote that he received, or didn’t receive, in all the states that existed in Lincoln’s day suggests that 144 years after Appomattox, the legacy of slavery and the Civil War continue to cast a heavy shadow over the South.

Aziza Margari has some great thoughts on gender and authority to speak in the Black American Muslim community.

The BBC asks, “What if you had a racist friend?”

The Just Seeds blog has an interesting indictment of appropriation in advertising focusing on the Obey brand:

Fairey’s digging up of the visual elements of political history does more to hide that history than illuminate it. Fairey depends on the source of his work being perceived of as “authentic” or “real.” At the same time, he does nothing to let people know the images are taken from actual historical moments and struggles. I’m much less concerned with this tendency being labeled “theft,” than with the lack of attribution of the source material, or even acknowledgment that there is source material. Our society is pretty seriously fucked up, hundreds of millions are hungry, homeless or in prison, and those are just the most base of factors to judge the health of a community. The history of people struggling to change these things is important, and is largely removed from popular culture and public education. In order to create a better world, we need to have an understanding of the successes and failures of those that came before us. Unfortunately Fairey’s work simply skims the “cool” parts of these struggles off the top, and buries the rest back into the books he took the images from. For anyone that thinks I’m overstating my point, and believe people really do know where Fairey’s images are from, I’m sorry to say you are very wrong. I was recently in a room of University of California students (college students in one of the best university systems in the US), and not a single one of them recognized an image of Angela Davis, who teaches in the University of California system! Fairey’s work is not bringing attention to Davis, the Black Panthers, or any of the struggles in the Black community, but instead uses the image of a self-confident and militant Black woman to sell sweatshop-made OBEY winter caps at department stores.

Obama has moved to appoint a senior White House adviser for tribal issues.

“He’ll soon appoint a policy adviser to his senior White House staff to work with tribes and across the government on these issues such as sovereignty, health care, education — all central to the well-being of Native American families and the prosperity of tribes all across this country,” the first lady said.

Renee Martin has a piece up at GlobalComment about “fauxgressives“:

Everyone knows one of these people. You know the type that reads the coles notes, never the original books but thinks somehow that original thought is their expertise. You know the “it’s not sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc., because of the I-R-O-N-Y” person.

The East Bay Express covers an issue of discrimination by a community bank:

Oakland’s Community Bank of the Bay has apologized to one of its Muslim customers for refusing to serve her until she took off her headscarf. [...] Here’s the weird thing: the Community Bank of the Bay was explicitly set up to provide microlending to nonprofits and low-income customers who can’t get access to credit elsewhere.

Erin Aubrey Kaplan continues earning her checks at Salon by examining Michelle Obama’s blackness for a white audience. This week: black hair moments.

Elle, PHD has an excellent piece up about why it does matter:

A symbol of a collective knowing: According to the National Black Women’s Health Project, 40% of us “report coercive contact of a sexual nature” by the time we’re 18. (Note that’s just what is reported.) And no matter our age, we are less likely than white women to report the assault, less likely to seek medical and psychological help [...].

When her mother was asked what she had taught her daughter about sex, she replied, “Not to have it.” That is a response, I believe, rooted in the influence of religion in African Americans’ lives and a defense mechanism, an attempt to combat the persistent Jezebel stereotype that haunts black women. For example, in the first two minutes of this clip from “Luke’s Parental Advisory, Luther Campbell not only tells his daughter to abstain under threat of disease, but also explains to her how many partners will put her in “H-O territory,” delivering a double-threat of fearmongering and slut-shaming.

So, what happens when we do “have it?” How many of our parents tell us simply not to have it and leave it at that? I mean, there are plenty of people out there telling girls that having sex makes them “used” or “soiled,” that virginity is a gift, something that belongs to a future husband long before they’ve even met him. Once it is gone, they are dirty and have nothing to offer. They are less desirable as partners.

They are worthless.

(Thanks to readers jvansteppes, Rob Schmidt, ananser, InfodivaMLIS415, and LyraTorg for sending tips!)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. PETA “Protests” as the KKK « Vegans of Color on 12 Feb 2009 at 2:21 pm

    [...] first heard of this unfortunately unsurprising travesty on Racialicious (they got the tip from Womanist Musings; and thanks to Noemifor letting me know about that post). [...]

Comments

  1. CEdwards wrote:

    On PETA: You haven’t seen anything until you’ve see them compare the Holocaust to the killing of chickens by the farming industry. Believe me, I didn’t believe it until I saw the ad myself…

  2. Mult. Commentator wrote:

    PETA’s strategy of dressing up as Klan members in the middle of NYC would seem to be an excellent way of generating attention for their, ahem, cause. But the fact that they would perform this stunt reflects the skewed value system that lies at the heart of much of liberal Euro-American politics.

  3. AintIAWoman wrote:

    These are a ton of great links I don’t know what to respond to first.

    Well, PETA is in-fucking-sane. They are a sexist, racist, insensitive, unaware organization masquerading as an animal rights group. There is a way to have a conversation of animal rights, factory farming, and all the terrible things we are doing to food, without ANY of this sort of thing. There is no defense for PETA. None.

  4. Monie wrote:

    I HATE PETA. I’ve hated them since their campaign comparing animal mistreatment to the mistreatment enslaved African Americans endured.

    I repeat; I HATE PETA. They are a bunch of racists, period.

  5. Molly wrote:

    PETA never seems to notice the irony of its comparisons … like how practically its entire membership is white. Who’s the group that’s like the KKK again?

  6. Ejunco wrote:

    Peta is a bunch of crazed idiots. Comparing human events and trying to relate it to animal slaughter.

  7. Yolanda C. wrote:

    PETA’s been callous about human oppression for years. From misogynist ads to their transphobic “Fur is a Drag” campaign to their rank comparisons of factory farming to both slavery AND the Holocaust, PETA’s proven time after time to be well-rounded bigots.

    It got so deep that the Southern Poverty Law Center started tracking them a few years ago, after both the slavery and Holocaust campaigns. I don’t why SPLC won’t go ahead and list PETA as a hate group already.

  8. Joselle wrote:

    I’m vegan, a woman of color, and a supporter of TRUE animal rights. I’m adamantly opposed to PETA and their tactics. This is truly deplorable, disgusting and makes my fucking blood boil.

    Just please don’t conflate those who fight against the suffering animals face with the nutjobbery of PETA. They are sick, sick, sick. They make me sooooo angry because they make things WORSE for animals—including human ones.

  9. Kaonashi wrote:

    This makes me want to grab the nearest burger and go to town. How typical of PETA to do something super sensational like this. They have done more to hurt their cause than any other animal rights organization out there.

  10. Heather wrote:

    Dear Michael McGraw,

    It’s an uncomfortable comparison because it’s wildly inappropriate and absolutely out of line. I almost became a supporter of PETA a few years ago until I realized that your company pulls bullshit stunts like this for the sake of shock value with more regard for animals than human beings. Thanks for reminding me why I stay away from groups like yours.

  11. Beth wrote:

    I find it interesting that the first lady is the one speaking to the senior White House advisor for tribal issues. Personally I’m glad to see her being active and visible, rather than playing the political role, but it’s also interesting that she seems to be speaking publicly to issues he isn’t (whether for political reasons or just because he’s been busy with the financial crisis).

    PETA is disgusting. Rather than offer animals human levels of dignity (which I believe they claim is their goal), they offer humans animal levels of dignity. It makes some poetic sense that they would draw on other groups who did the same, even if their intent was to apply the standard to *all* humans. Which should only serve to condemn them further for their clearly-intentional appropriation of human oppression from their position of privilege.

  12. CJsDaddy wrote:

    @Joselle – can you suggest an alternative organization to PETA? I know about the ASPCA and Humane Society, but those seem (at least locally) focused on rescuing pets and livestock. Certainly respectable causes, but not exactly animal rights.

  13. Minotaar wrote:

    I’ve never had a problem with animal rights, and I agree with PETA’s case in general that animal rights should be respected. However, I’ve always felt that PETA, as an organization, seems concerned only with cute animals, and cares little about endangered species and animals who couldnt be domesticated. You never see PETA defending the cause of the slimy green eel or the gross sea anemone (*made up names to make a point).

    Also, I find PETA’s cause to be philosophically hypocritcal, or at least undefendable when taken to its logical extreme. How can they argue against swatting flies and pestilence spreading mosquitoes? They cant. It seems impossible to hold that all animal life should have inalienable near-human rights attributed to our charismatic fauna – our cats and dogs and polar bears. All this just leads me to believe that they’ve got their message wrong and are wasting their time.

  14. atlasien wrote:

    As an alternative for animal lovers, I really like Wildaid.org. They use culturally appropriate awareness campaigns to promote conservation of endangered animals and reduce the demand for poaching. Their figures suggest you can get a lot of mileage without using Peta-style offensive shock tactics.

    http://wildaid.org/index.asp?CID=506

    “Regional results have included 78% of viewers in Taiwan reporting that they would never use endangered species products again.”

  15. BlackDahlia wrote:

    This is so incredibly offensive. As a Black woman who’s great uncle was lynched in Mississippi in 1948, there is no comparison. How ignorantly self-righteous. My God…no wonder people can’t fucking stand PETA! This makes my skin crawl and makes me think that they are comparing the troubles of a displaced PEOPLE to freaking dog shows??? How dare you compare the slaughter of MY people to animals. Screw you Peta….you JUST lost a member.

  16. Joselle wrote:

    @CJS Daddy: In terms of giving money to animal rights organizations, I will donate to a local animal sanctuary (like Catskill Animal Sanctuary). I’d rather give money to a grassroots organization that directly helps animals in need than ones that just need to plump up their PR budget a la PETA.

    As for activism, I went vegan and I try to be a healthy and happy one. To me, that was the most tangible way I could say I am trying not to hurt animals the best way I can.

    Atlasien, I hadn’t heard of Wildaid. I will check out the link.

  17. Logan wrote:

    Another really stupid (among many) thing with PETA: If they were going to protest like this, and if they really wanted to do a shock value get people to take notice message, they should’ve dressed up as NAZIs. While it still would’ve been offensive, at least their method of protest would’ve made some sense.

    What they were protesting as far as I understand was the alleged forced breeding of purebreds, how they were valued, and subsequently how half-breds were inferior and thrown out. This is much more up the NAZI alley of genetic superiority rather than the KKK who pretty much thought of non-White or non-Catholic as inferior. Unless PETA is trying to equate minorities to being mutts and whites as purebreds (which manages to make the use of the KKK in protest even worse, if that was possible, in terms of racial implications), it just shows how poorly thought out this was at getting a message across, and nothing more than an attention grab.

  18. jvansteppes wrote:

    PETA must have some sort of weird quest to set the record for making the most fucked up arguments possible across the board.
    Remember when they caught the pig farmer who killed a bunch of the Vancouver missing women years ago and there were rumors that he put them in sausages that could very well have been eaten by the victim’s own relatives? PETA made a billboard comparing the murder of the women to the slaughter of pigs for pork and totally traumatized the women’s families even more.
    If I was ever to see a billboard comparing dog breeding to lynching or whatever their comparison is I would paint over it in broad daylight as I do with swastikas in my neighborhood.

  19. Phrone wrote:

    Wow. Lots of articles. Yeah, the PETA one is really, really bad. >| I sometimes wonder if ranchers or other meat producers are paying PETA, because they’ve done so much harm to the animal rights movement.

    That’s so sad about the community bank discrimination. I wish there were some way to make organizations that were serving the poor more accountable, but sometimes it just seems that you only get hold accountable when you serve rich people. :|

  20. DomiX wrote:

    1st: When it said Owen Wilson, I thought it meant the actor.

    2nd: PETA really has issues.

  21. A.D. Nix wrote:

    Re: Shepherd Fairey: He’s a nice guy if a little ass but he is completely drunk on his own hype and plays at a kind of innocence that his voracious brand machine belies. He sticks so close to the source imagery and does so little to note the reference that it definitely operates as a kind of erasure. Not to mention what happens when you slap it on a skateboard or use it in collaboration with the very corporate machines you claim to rage against (or, worse still, that the subjects or creators of the source material fought against).

    It’s like using Catherine Opie as source material for an Axe commercial.

    Re: PETA
    Quel surprise.

  22. Free wrote:

    Re: Why it does matter

    I totally relate to that post. Growing up hell-fire-brimstone-speaking-in-tongues Pentecostal I learned early and heard often the warnings of the cost of not being a good girl. Remain a virgin until marriage or you will surely go to hell. God is lenient with boys but does not love bad girls. Become a Jezebel and you will leave my house, said Momma, (yes, she loved me, but God and the Church came first). My virgin days were hell: pressure and oppression. Men in the church, strangers, neighbors, even a school teacher whispering after me, touching, kissing, exposing, masturbating, and near rape all before my 10th birthday. And I never said a thing because already being under suspicion just for being a girl, I would get the blame, (Eve, root of all sin, tempted Adam). In truth, I’d rather my family condemn me as LUSTY HO than live through all that shit again. And don’t think this bullshit only happens in poor families. I grew up middle class with wealth relations who all believed the same way about girls.

    Signed,
    Joyful X-virgin

    p.s. There’s a lot of talk and condemnation of about Muslims fetishizing virginity and not nearly enough about Christians. What’s sad is that U.S. girls and women accept this B.S. What happened to feminism and women being in control of their bodies? What in the hell is going on with the post-boomer generations?

  23. Jennifer wrote:

    @Logan-
    “This is much more up the NAZI alley of genetic superiority rather than the KKK who pretty much thought of non-White or non-Catholic as inferior.”

    To be fair, KKK was actually anti-Catholic (along with anti-Semitic), rather than pro-Catholic, as you make it sound. This was probably not your intention, but I did want to clarify that the KKK was not a Catholic organization in any way, and indeed did try to intimidate Catholics, especially immigrants, in their communities. Not in the same horrific ways they treated blacks, but in some pretty nasty ways nonetheless.

  24. embarcadero13 wrote:

    I”m a vegetarian woman of color. I like animals. I believe in their rights.

    I live in San Francisco. Once, I was in Walgreen’s and a woman walked into the store holding a dog while she shopped. When the attendant politely asked her to leave the dog outside, she gasped, “You let those homeless people in! My dog is cleaner than THAT!” and proceeded to make a scene.

    Yeah.

    Animal rights becomes a way for the white privileged to feel “persecuted.”

  25. Naomi C wrote:

    Commentin on the Washington Post article about the red state/blue state split in relation to the confederate states..

    I grew up in a small town in Geo’gia, and so I’ll just talk about my own state here.. But I really dont think it’s as much a matter of race as this writer wants you to believe. From his charts, it does look like there’s a correlation, but he fails to mention that John Kerry got the EXACT SAME percentage of GA’s white vote as Obama did.

    There are more conservative religious folk down there than in Northern states generally. I def wouldnt clump them all as votin b/c of the racial issue. Moreso the “moral” issues.

    I’m definitely a liberal, but I gotta defend my homestate sometimes from misleading assumptions

  26. Logan wrote:

    Jennifer: Ack. Sorry, I got facts mixed together in my head, I knew they were Anti-Semetic, but I forgot which Christian denomination they followed, and I should’ve known better that Catholics had their own persecution for a long period of time. I should’ve put Protestant in there, since I was trying to make the point they believed more that anyone outside their narrow group or intrusions to said group was bad (simplified version), and that it really made little sense for PETA to protest as them. Thanks for the correction there.

  27. Lisa wrote:

    Sometimes when I think the state of the world is improving, PETA is in the news and reminds me that I’m wrong.

  28. DivergentDana wrote:

    “However, I’ve always felt that PETA, as an organization, seems concerned only with cute animals, and cares little about endangered species and animals who couldnt be domesticated. You never see PETA defending the cause of the slimy green eel or the gross sea anemone (*made up names to make a point).”

    I think the strategy is to eventually defend all animals, but they know that the best marketing strategy to the public is focusing on “cute” animals, because non-animal rights folk do care about them more, even if animal rights activists see them equally. This is a general thing, not just about Peta — Peta is ridiculous, and most animal rights activists see it as such.

  29. Paz wrote:

    One stunt by PETA that had me cracking up was when they decided to post a sign on the Mexico – U.S. border presumably for people trying to cross illegally saying “If the Border Patrol Doesn’t Get You, the Chicken and Burgers Will — Go Vegan.” And it had a drawing with fat Americans eating burgers and hot dogs on one side of the border and Mexicans on the other side eating fruit and dancing.
    Seriously, who are they kidding with this shit?
    The KKK thing is disgusting though. Their stunts just seem to be getting worse and worse.

  30. Sam wrote:

    @ Naomi C

    Yeah this is correct. Obama earned a higher percentage of the white vote overall than any Democratic presidential candidate since LBJ, so I think really it’s a matter of misunderstanding statistics. Yes, in former Confederate states he lost the white vote by huge margins, but all national Democratic candidates do because these states are extremely Republican (again, at the national level, not always at state or district level) and the Republican party is overwhelmingly white.

    Of course Oregon is going to send a majority of white voters to Obama because, simply enough, Oregon has proportionally far more Democrats, and far more white Democrats at that.

  31. allheavens wrote:

    PETA dressed up as Nazi Storm Troopers in New York city? Honey, the whole area would have been on lock down, but blatantly disrespect Black folk. . .

    Any Black person who passed these idiots on the street and didn’t put their boot heel up their asses should be ashamed. Yeah, I know I should not be advocating violence but sometimes some people need to have their craniums rattled so badly that whole future generations of their offspring feel it.

    PETA should stand for Privileged Egomaniacal Twats Association and SPLC should list them as a hate group. I am going to write a formal letter and an e-mail to SPLC to press that issue.

    Also do they have an ad agency of record? I need to research that. If they do, I am going rip them a new one too.

    I have had enough of these MOFOs.

  32. Flo wrote:

    It’s things like this that make me embarrassed to be white and vegan, PETA why must you give us all such a bad name with your extreme insensitivity? yes I care about animals, but that doesn’t mean that the stuggles of fellow people should be demeaned in order to premote vegetarianism.

  33. Baiskeli wrote:

    WTF! (shakes head). I’m at a loss for words, especially after their eating animals == slavery crap they pulled last year and the holocaust one.

    I guess PETA are the anti-Dale Carnegie. Rather than How to win friends and influence people they are How to make enemies and alienate people. They seem to be the Andy Kaufman of social movements.

  34. Whitney wrote:

    I hate PETA. I’m a vegetarian (well technically a pescetarian), and I hate it that people associate us with PETA. I do not support their actions at all (although the whole Trollsons is pretty funny). This only makes me hate them even more since I have Jewish ancestors. They resort to guerilla tactics, in-your-face extremism, and they are actually identified as domestic terrorists by the US.

    Funny, PETA has started a campaign to start calling fish “sea kittens.” Yack. They need to go away fast.

  35. Emilie wrote:

    As other posters have pointed out, the PETA stunt is racist, deplorable and disgusting. It is insensitive and intellectually dishonest to pretend that a dog breeding has anything to do with the violent legacy of the KKK.There can be no metaphorical use of KKK artifacts–they only have one meaning.

    I wonder, though, whether it’s appropriate to attribute, as Renee does, PETA’s action to “the audacity of whiteness.”PETA represents the beliefs of people with a singular focus on animals. Should we infer from PETA’s misogynist ads the “misogyny of whiteness?” Of course not. This action reflects the racism of PETA supporters, not “the audacity of whiteness.”

  36. Emilie wrote:

    * Whoops. My second sentence should read “It is insensitive and intellectually dishonest to pretend that dog breeding has anything to do with the violent legacy of the KKK”

  37. Leah wrote:

    PETA won’t stop at anything, really – despite its founder being a woman, they’re always ready to use a woman as a sex object to try to pass on a message of not using animals…

    As an Ecology student, what bothers me the most about them is the sheer amount of money going into their stupid antics considering they do no on-the-ground work whatsoever. If you want to improve animals’ lives, donate to an organisation Ducks Unlimited or the WWF, who will actually work on conservation efforts. Not to mention how much their ridiculousness hurts people – not just through their racist and sexist actions, but things like trying to ban the Newfoundland seal (guess who helps reduce sea kitten populations?) hunt without actually doing anything to compensate for the already-vulnerable NL economy should that come to pass. There are no consequences for their actions, to them.

    /end PETA rant

    It always astonishes me how few accommodations there seem to be for Muslim women under the veil. It’s not that difficult to respect – give them the option of going into a closed room with a female employee to remove their hijab if it is seriously *that* necesary.