Series Introduction: Globalization – Of Bond and Global Politics

by Guest Contributor Ansel, originally published at Mediahacker

Editor’s Note: I watched the Quantum of Solace the weekend it opened. This is not unusual for me, as I watch all the Bond films and like them all for different reasons. However, I wasn’t planning to write specifically on Bond until longtime reader Ansel (now of the Mediahacker blog) sent his review of the film for consideration. I enjoyed the review, especially as it touched on a matter of great importance in our current times: the effect of globalization on communities of color. And so, I am using Ansel’s review as a jumping off point for larger discussions about global politics and policy, now found using the “globalization” tab. The first of the series will go live tomorrow – until then, enjoy. – LDP

*Spoiler Alert*

James Bond, 007. For decades the British super-spy’s name stood for deadly charisma, over-the-top international espionage, and fancy gadgets – until the series took a more realist approach two years ago when actor Daniel Craig took over the role from Pierce Brosnan. The critics hailed Craig’s turn in “Casino Royale” for his icy cool and the physical presence he brought to new, grittier action sequences. This was finally a Bond for the new century, they said.

From an anti-kyriarchy point-of-view, I think Quantum of Solace better fits that description. Casino Royale’s plot was based on Ian Fleming’s original Bond novel about a corrupt financial magnate. The story took place mostly in Europe and turned on a high-stakes poker match played by ultra-rich elites.

With Solace, all the familiar elements are still there – the frenetic action, expensive cars, the constant tension between Bond and M, his boss at MI6, played by Judi Dench. As in every other Bond movie, most women in the film look like supermodels and are used or controlled by men, whether by force or by Bond’s charm. He sleeps with one of them in this movie, slightly down from absurd average of 2.5 women per film.

But James Bond fighting to protect the water supply for impoverished indigenous Bolivian villages? From a wealthy villain who poses as the head of an eco-friendly company called “Greene Planet” and conspires with U.S. intelligence to overthrow a leftist president? Now there’s something new and timely.

Bond’s vengeful pursuit of the killer of his love-interest from previous film takes him early on to Haiti. Just before embarking on an explosive boat escape in the docks of Port-Au-Prince, Bond observes Dominic Greene, the creepy and ruthless businessman brilliantly played by Mathieu Amalric, in a candid exchange with a general who aspires to dictatorship.

General Medrano: And you can do all this for me?

Greene: Well, look at what we did to this country. The Haitians elect a priest who decides to raise the minimum wage from 38 cents to 1 dollar a day. It’s not a lot, but it’s enough to upset the corporations who were here making t-shirts and running shoes. So they called us. We facilitated a change.

This is the first time, to my knowledge, that the real story of the U.S.-backed coup against Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the twice-elected President of Haiti, has been acknowledged in the mass media. While a few solitary investigative journalists have written books or produced documentaries about the coup, the major U.S. news media dutifully covered up or ignored the story. Leave it to this latest Bond film, of all things, to help counter the propaganda about Haiti as the country continues to suffer from years of abuse at the hands of neo-colonial powers.

Bond infiltrates, drives, flies, and shoots his way through the rest of the movie trying to stop another coup from taking place in Bolivia, where Greene wants to privatize the water rights in collaboration with the U.S. government by re-establishing a friendly military junta there. The Washington Post’s critic derides all this as “a ludicrous environmental cautionary tale about corporate control of water.”

Tell that to Bolivians, whose water rights were privatized by the World Bank in 1997. In what some called a “water war,” Bechtel was chased out of the country as Bolivians took to the streets in mass opposition to the company’s high prices for basic water services. Evo Morales, Bolivia’s first-ever indigenous president, now plans to enshrine a right to water in the constitution. Indeed, the indigenous Bolivians depicted as demure victims in the film have proven in the real world that they don’t require the violent heroics of a rich white guy like Bond to organize and take back their own country.

Along the way Bond is helped by the movie’s sole independent person-of-color of any significance to the story, the black C.I.A. agent Felix Leiter played by Jeffrey Wright. He defies his boss and opposes the coup in Bolivia. His now-second appearance in the Bond series, along with the election of Barack Obama, has spurred talk of Jamie Fox, P. Diddy (really, Diddy?), or some other actor (what about Denzel?) becoming the first Black Bond in the near future.

“Quantum of Solace” is a fine blockbuster film (it’s grossed some $454 million worldwide) with some amazing action sequences. It has all the requisite elements of your standard Bond film, with the unfortunate exception of spiffy high-tech gadgets. A general failure to portray women and people of color as unique individuals, much less agents of their own destiny is par for the course for the Bond series. A story that questions “greenwashing” and calls attention to U.S. complicity in imposing neoliberalism on the two poorest countries in the hemisphere certainly is not. And it’s a welcome departure from the simplistic man-saves-world-from-brown-skinned-terrorists thread that’s all too common in action films these days.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Globalization Theory in the New James Bond film “Quantum of Solace” « Theory Teacher’s Blog on 05 Jan 2009 at 3:41 pm

    [...] other bloggers have  followed with their own posts that agree with my point about globalization here, here, here, here, here … … and probably more but I got tired of looking. However, [...]

Comments

  1. WriteBlack wrote:

    That talk about a black Bond is just that: Talk.

    First, Craig is doing an excellent job and probably will be around for a while.

    Secondly, it wouldn’t be any of those guys, since they’re not Brits. I’ll know there’s serious interest in a nonwhite Bond when I hear some of the producers of the series talk about it, and that hasn’t happened yet. If they go black, it’s likely to mean they’d consider someone such as Idris Elba, not Jamie Foxx (too American, too stupid), Denzel Washington (too American, too old) or Diddy (too American, too unattractive, too wrong in every possible way).

  2. Penni Brown wrote:

    This movie left me feeling like I had missed the first 20 minutes or something. The action sequences were fun but the overall effect was overdone. The plot seemed until the end of the movie to be too implicit. It was almost like there was a prerequisite that we didn’t know about and that if you hadn’t read, you wouldn’t get this movie. When Bond slept with the girl, it seemed obligatory. Almost like, ‘I’m Bond and I’m supposed to sleep with someone.’ there was none of those playful double entendres between the woman and Bond. Actually, no chemistry between them at all.

    The more likely conquest would’ve been the Dominican woman that he linked up with throughout the movie.

    I like Craig as Bond and I like that the movies have grittier action sequences, I just wished with this one they have spent a little more time on the dialogue and making it lay the story out better.

  3. Black-Bond-I-Wish wrote:

    Producer Harry Saltzman’s daughter was on a recent Canadian public radio call-in show.

    When asked about a multicultural Bond (heck, I tried to stray away from the obvious Will Smith and suggested Chow Yun-Fat among two or three others) she gave me a muted response.

    It was along with lines that it’s not possible because Bond is British and reflects British society.

    Err, while I haven’t left North America, I hear tell there is a range of ethnicity across the pond.

    I love the Bond franchise, I grew up with it anti-feminist flaws (the least of its flaws) and all.

    But, hella seriously?! There needs to be a different shade of Bond in the mix.

    It’s not jumping the shark. Y’all done did that years ago with everyone after Sean. Or maybe Dalton, the last good Bond.

    Give a colored brother – ANY COLOR – a chance. Multiculturalism is not best saved for Bond girls (Halle), sidekicks (Felix) and, gracious forbid, villans (Grace).

  4. Eric Grant wrote:

    Is an other-than-white Bond somehow better than an original super-spy of colour (played by Chitwell Ejifor (sp?), say)?

  5. Mary wrote:

    I’m not optimistic about seeing an actor of color play Bond at any point in the future. Because, and this is fairly amusing now, but I remember a general flipping of shit across the Internet when Daniel Craig was cast, because the producers had dared to make James Bond… gasp… blond.

    Having said that, I will beat the drum for Chiwetel Ejiofor as long and hard as I need to, because that man is FINE. And a good actor, too.

  6. Mahsino wrote:

    I’m not really for forced race changes in the name of diversity in movies. I’ll accept an all white cast in movies if it seems appropriate (period pieces, comic book characters, etc) or if its an established white character. But if we’re on the subject I may as well add: any actor other than Chiwetel Ejiofor as the first black Bond should be considered a fail.

  7. turtlebella wrote:

    I felt the same way as Penni, but thought it was because I watched it with my 6 week old and had to nurse partway through! Glad it wasn’t just me.

    It’s funny, I didn’t think twice about the Haiti thing, except to nod knowingly. I forget that most people don’t *actually* know what went down there. I guess it is pretty bizarre that it should be acknowledged in a Bond movie. And I guess I’m not at all surprised that the Washington Post would like us all to believe that the corporate control of water is impossible or ludicrous. Or at least that they are just as blind as most people are to this kind of thing.

    This isn’t strictly on the topic of globalization, but did anyone else find Olga Kurylenko’s skin color a little…odd? I didn’t much know about the racial mixture of people in Bolivia, but it struck me as odd during the movie. And so I looked it up, found out she was Ukranian (as is suggested by her name) and quite pale-skinned. So then I was really confused, did a little search and found out that she thought her character should be darker-skinned (she’d already worked on her accent), so she asked the film’s powers-that-be if she could tan, so she would look more Bolivian (and presumably indigenous). And they let her. I was completely stymied by that and a little bit horrified. Because of course, it’s clear (to me anyway) that she doesn’t look anything like the indigenous people of Bolivia/South America. Apparently the thought was accent + tan = presto bingo! person of color/indigenous person. I found that pretty naive, if not downright offensive. Especially since I’m guessing there are plenty of light-skinned Bolivians, what with European colonization and all, and it wouldn’t have been that odd the she should be Bolivian.

    But you know, all Latin Americans are brown, no other colors allowed (/sarcasm).

  8. Arturo wrote:

    If we’re talking about a black Bond, then maybe someone like Colin Salmon would be better-suited. I’ve read that Salmon was in contention to become the new Doctor, a role which, in some circles, carries greater weight than ol’ 007.

  9. Safiya Outlines wrote:

    Colin Salmon (black British actor) was talked about as a possible black Bond and he’s previously had a role in two Brosnan era Bond films.

    Please no more talk about Diddy as Bond *shudder*

  10. KuriusJurge612 wrote:

    I think that if there is a non-white Bond he will probably be part of the South Asian community is Britain

  11. KuriusJurge612 wrote:

    I meanit *in Britain*

  12. Cynthia wrote:

    It’s very unlikely they’ll ever cast an American or Canadian actor, regardless of skin colour as Bond – no matter how good a British accent he can do.

  13. Ansel wrote:

    I’m glad I could help kick off a globalization series at Racialicious. Thanks, Latoya!

    @Penni – A lot of reviewers said they couldn’t follow the action sequences, but I thought they were pretty good. My only gripe is the lack of gadgets and fast cars. You’re right that Bond’s sleeping with the other spy lady seemed like it was thrown in as an afterthought. I found it straining my suspension of disbelief, even by Bond standards, that a top MI6 spy sent to confine Bond to the hotel would just give in so easily.

    @turtabella – Thanks for bringing up Kurylenko’s skin color. I noticed it but my review would have been way too long if I’d attempted to sort through that. It’s almost worse than you said, because Wikipedia says her character is half-Russian, half-Bolivian and there are indeed a lot of light-skinned folks in Bolivia.

    @Safiya – Yeah I couldn’t believe anyone would think of Diddy as Bond. Just… no.

  14. MK wrote:

    Nice to see somebody that actually watches the movies analyzing them, rather than someone who doesn’t watch them spouting off. I enjoy the series (except for a handful of entries), but I also recognize it for what it generally is: non-PC, high-octane escapism. Countries that aren’t Britain are usually “prettied up” to provide a better looking locale.
    While actors of color and women are always supporting characters (obviously), I wouldn’t say the series has always failed to portray them as individuals. Granted, we don’t watch Bond movies for strong characterizations and complex plots, but sometimes somebody manages to emerge from the mayhem. Michelle Yeoh in “Tomorrow Never Dies,” for instance. Yeah. she did the usual martial arts, but she was more of Bond’s ally than his woman.
    Bond and global politics? That made me chuckle, because you can’t take that stuff seriously in those movies. If a Bond film were to take a serious look at global politics it would be a silly disaster.
    Oh, and I’m thinking that if there is going to be a non-white Bond, he will still be British.

  15. MK wrote:

    One more thing: “Quantum of Solace” sucked. Too much (badly edited) action, too little story, and boring characters.

  16. Sam bozzo wrote:

    The Real James Bond of Water! Mynew documentary Blue Gold : World Water Wars, based on the book, depicts the real-life Bond water villains securing fresh water for personal gain at any costs.

    Here’s a blog I wrote about how it compares to the new James Bond water-villain
    http://www.greenmuze.com/blogs/guest-bloggers/618-the-real-james-bond-of-water.html

    Lives have been lost and the water wars have begun, so I’m glad Bond is tackling real villains. You should check out the doc which tells some stories much more terrifying than Mr. Greene. http://www.bluegold-worldwaterwars.com

  17. Rchoud wrote:

    This was the first time I heard about the real story behind Aristides’ overthrow. How terrible that the MSM willingly hid this information from the public so that if/when the story ever does come out (like in action movies such as this) people will be made to scoff at it and think movies are good at cooking up “conspiracy theories”.

    Good thing the Iraq invasion came out to be such a clusterfuck that no one could hide the way it was planned out and executed. Otherwise we would have had to settle for it being depicted in Hollywood as “conspiracy theories”.

  18. Alonso wrote:

    I liked ‘Amelie’ but it would’ve been better if Amelie was latina.

  19. brad wrote:

    Turtlebella,

    I didn’t have a problem with Olga Kurylenko’s skin color because there are plenty of Latin Americans who look like her who have mixed white and indigenous ancestry. Aren’t there African-Americans with dark skin who are mixed race and have European facial features?

    Over all, I thought the film was a B+ effort.

    As for a person of color as Bond, I wouldn’t imagine that happening in the next 5 to 10 years. Daniel Craig is young enough for 3 more films (usually takes 2 to 3 years between films).

    Doctor Who, on the other hand, might be an easier target for a man of color to be the next Time Lord since the current actor plans to leave the role soon.

  20. Phrone wrote:

    For those who said they were lost: you can’t really understand it without seeing Casino Royale (or reading the Wikipedia page, like I did) so that might be why…or it could be because the beginning is super abrupt. xD

    Apparently the National Review called the idea of American complicity in a Latin American coup absurd in the review for the movie. Yeah…Haiti? Guatemala? Chile? I’m sure they might say differently. (And I don’t think they would be alone.)

    This was the first Bond movie I’ve ever seen, and I loved it. It disappointed me so much that, when I was looking at the older ones, there doesn’t seem to be anything comparable from Bond. I thought it was a really good movie, and I liked the female lead. (She was Peruvian, right? Or at least, in the Peruvian secret service?)

    I think they did a better job at portraying the agency of the women and the people of color. The agent (wow I forget everyone’s names!) had her own mission, which paralleled Bond’s quite nicely and I thought she could hold her own. I don’t think the Bolivians were passive so much as in the dark — just like everyone else, including the US government. That being said, I do still think a lot of the portayal is problematic. Something about [spoiler] the death of the redheaded agent really bothered me, though…it just seemed to eroticize violence against women. That could be me. Anyone else have other thoughts? I know it was a throwback to Goldfinger, but still…creepy.

  21. Christopher Chambers wrote:

    Forgive the Washington Post for it knows not what it does. The Style section folk are cut off from trhe News people, and the News desks are paralyzed from from potential layoffs to think creatively. The critic in question likely didn’t have the time to do the little extra bit of digging to show that the Bolivia issue carried more than a taste of verisimilitude. Indeed, this flick was based more in reality than say, uh, Goldfinger. LOL. Which brings me to the next point–I think there’s a weird reverse arrogance of form demanded by critics. They want Bond to be more rough hewn and “human,” yet think a Bond film is the wrong forum in which to base real issues. Oh well.

    As to an ethnic Bond, let’s pick our battles, folks. I’m still fiending on Sean Connery and getting used to Craig. Let’s just elevate Jeffrey Wright as Felix Lighter.

  22. Anna wrote:

    Hmm… this review makes me think I may want to watch QoS. It didn’t really reach out and grip me earlier, although I quite liked Casino Royale.

    One of the things I like about the “new” Bond is the inclusion of Dame Judi Dench as M. I think having an older woman in the film with an important role over Bond is a very good thing.

    I cannot imagine the wankstorm that would hit should an actor of colour be chosen for Bond. Just the recent storm over the possibility of a Black Dr Who has been atrocious. (You can’t change the classics! Oh noes! The Doctor is totally White! White white white! No changes!)

  23. bdsista wrote:

    I sent the link to this to the reviewer at the Post and asked her to comment on the Post’s view about green issues in the Caribbean and Latin America. I invited her to comment. Chris good to see you here old school chum! Being a former journalist, I don’t let anyone off the hook, especially anyone who has the access to resources and accurate information at an organization like the Post. I did Arts reviews and if its in the movie, then IMO, you research its possible validity before dismissing it outright. What the comment may have been more indicative of is ethnocentric laziness. i.e. I have never heard of it, don’t know about it, don’t want to know about it, therefore it does not exist.

  24. Penni Brown wrote:

    @ Phrone: I saw Casino Royale and loved it!

    I agree with MK’s succint opinion of this movie.

    I also don’t mind if Bond stays white. Give me a completely different series with Chiwetel or Idris as the super sexy sophisticated secret agent.

  25. Arturo wrote:

    Anna,

    I don’t mean to derail the thread, but I’d be interested in reading anything you’ve got regarding the Doctor Who issue.

  26. cvalda wrote:

    I thought Camille, the Haitian seeking vengeance, was one of the better Bond girls the series has produced. She had her own agenda, carried it out, didn’t get the Woman in Refrigerator treatment and wasn’t obliged to sleep with Bond along the way.

    Unfortunately the traditional Bond girl treatment was reserved for “Strawberry Fields.”

  27. Soude! wrote:

    Regarding Olga Kurylenko- Forgive me because I haven’t seen the film but I did see a poster for it and the first I thought was “Wow she’s hot! and she’s brown! and those two are somewhat related!” I thought that she was Indian (from India) or from that region. After I googled her, finding out that she was a Ukranian and much paler than the poster was a little disappointing. I’m black, but I thought it would have been cool to have a Desi bond girl and I didn’t think she was as attractive with her natural paler skintone.

  28. allheavens wrote:

    I love the new reboot of the Bond series, loved this installment. Thought Craig was a brilliant choice, been a fan ever since his portrayal of Geordie Peacock in Our Friends in the North.

    A lot of folks were non to happy about the not so subtle jabs at America’s neo imperialism, exhibited in this exchange:

    Bond: “I wonder what South America would look like, if the United States hadn’t been so afraid of ‘Coco-Communism.’ I’ve always been impressed with the way you guys carved things up down here.”

    Felix: Coming from a Brit, I’ll take that as a compliment.”

    I always say, takes one to know one.

    As for the Bond of color, well, no. Can you imagine the crap Bond purist would put that poor soul through. Hell, they went bats_ _t crazy over a little thing like having a blond Bond.

    Beside, why appropriate a white cultural icon? Why not create our own super cool, super sexy secret agent and make him iconic.

    Chiwetel Ejiofor, Édgar Ramírez or Takeshi Kaneshiro. I think they would all be great and since we would not be appropriating a British icon the actor does not have to be British. Just dead sexy and a great actor.

  29. keith wrote:

    I think the Quantum of Solace movie is interesting in terms of how the U.S. and the CIA where mixed up in the corruption and deception of saving the planet .
    Now the perception of a black bond is interesting, I don’t think a black american actor would get that roll, because the story is always based in Britian.
    I think an american version of the 007 movie might be ok.
    I like to see more movies that are based on true stories rather just entertainment.
    One last thing, I think the power of the media could be used to teach the poputation, or it could be used keep us in the dark.