Open Letter: Resisting the Racist Blame Game Post Prop 8

by Guest Contributor Adele Carpenter

Dear Friends,

I am writing because I am disturbed by the string of articles, blog entries, and list serve threads that have come out in the last few days suggesting that the high turnout of African American and Latino voters for the presidential election was responsible for the passage of California’s proposition 8, which dealt a heavy blow to LGBT families by banning gay marriage in the state’s constitution.

These articles mistakenly imply that the struggles for civil rights for LGBT people and communities of color are separate or even at odds with each other. They deny the work that LGBT people of color do to combat homophobia and transphobia in their families and communities, often while facing racism within the queer community as well. These articles deny homophobia among white people. They displace blame away from those who actually have the power to consistently deny others civil and human rights, and instead, charge that when communities that have long been disenfranchised and alienated from political processes participate, that the results with be negative for LGBT people.

I believe all communities need to be held accountable for their homophobia and transphobia. I want to acknowledge the suffering and hardship that the passage of Proposition 8 has caused for LGBT couples and families. But, while the media casts blame on communities of color for the passage of Prop 8, it is imperative that we struggle against the logic that tells us that struggles for LGBT civil rights and racial justice are separate—that we re-examine our strategies for advancing LGBT civil rights and gay marriage and, in particular, look at places where LGBT communities have failed to align our struggles for civil rights with ongoing struggles for racial justice.

Californians live in a state that has one of the highest incarceration rates in a nation with the highest incarceration rate in the world. Studies have estimated that at any time, 40 percent of black men in their 20’s in California are under the control of the correctional system. Criminalization affects many LGBT people, in particular, those that may be experiencing addiction or who, lacking familial support, move to expensive cities where they may have a hard time accessing affordable housing and legal or living-wage work. I write from San Francisco, where, in the months leading up the election, I saw a massive mobilization within the queer spaces in which I spend time to get people to vote no on 8, but I saw little or no public discourse among LGBT people about very important state propositions: 5, 6, and 9—all of which potentially impacted things like funding for prisons, drug crime sentencing, or the trying of minors as adults in this state.

In the last months, we have seen raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) throughout the state and in San Francisco. Many people immigrate here for work as a result of a US foreign policy that destabilizes foreign economies. Additionally, San Francisco is home to many LGBT immigrants who may have come to the country seeking safety and asylum. While my inbox was flooded with emails pertaining to Prop 8, I heard from very few queer people who were seeking to mobilize around the October 31st demonstration to protest ICE raids, other work pertaining to ICE raids, or San Francisco’s establishment as a sanctuary city.

The November ballot contained several important city initiatives that could have affected the livability of our city both for low-income people of color and for many queer people:

Proposition K, an initiative to decriminalize prostitution, would have helped sex workers in this city to make major strides in their ability to organize for their rights and safety, allowing them to better protect themselves against violence and police harassment. Despite the fact that many, many young LGBT people in this city earn their livings as sex workers and daily face risks to their safety, and that trans women working as sex workers have lost their lives while working in the city within the last two years, I saw shockingly little effort among LGBT people to educate themselves on the realities facing sex workers or the background on Proposition K—Let alone to spread any word about it.

Similarly, proposition B, which would have mandated that the city set aside part of its budget for affordable housing was defeated by SF voters. We live in a city with a history of racist schemes of redevelopment and displacement: SOMA in the 60s, Justin Herman’s redevelopment of the Fillmore, illegal evictions in the Mission in the 90s, contemporary cuts to county welfare, and most recently, the gentrification of the Bayview—to name a few examples. And yet, San Francisco voters have failed to stand up for working families’ ability to live affordably in this city—a city where remaining working class communities of color face major threats of displacement.
Despite the fact that white LGBT people often play complicated roles in the gentrification of the city and displacement of communities of color, I saw no media reports released on November 5th scrutinizing the voting trends of white LGBT San Franciscans on Propositions B, N, K, 5, 6, or 9, as juxtaposed to the numerous articles scrutinizing the voting habits of Black and Latino voters on Prop 8. And despite the overwhelmingly negative outcome of several important local and state propositions, outcry among the wider LGBT community seems to have been reserved solely for the passage of Proposition 8.

As a young, queer woman living in San Francisco, I feel very strongly that affordability is vital to the creativity and well being of the city’s LGBT community. And as a white person living in the Mission, I have to think and act critically in regards to the complicated role I play in the gentrification of this neighborhood and the larger schemes of displacement within this city. I love my queer life and love living in this city. I get to witness the ways of living and congregating, making new families, new cultures, and envisioning new worlds that are possible living around so many other brilliant and creative queer people. While I would like to lend my support and compassion to people who lost the right to marry this week, I also question the logic that tells me that my only struggle as an LGBT person centers around my right to marry. While I sign petitions to support marriage as a civil right, I would like to see LGBT Californians take a serious look at the fact that housing, healthcare, employment, and freedom from police harassment and incarceration are also civil and human rights.

I would like to see LGBT Californians talk not only about how marriage rights could affect their ability to receive their partners’ health benefits, but about universal healthcare. I would like to hear us talk not just about how a lack of marriage rights separates couples where one member lacks citizenship, but connect this to struggles for immigrant rights. I would like to hear LGBT people not only talk about how their families are discriminated against, but link their struggles to those of the many California families where children are being raised by people other than their parents due to the mass incarceration of parents with children.

The passing of Proposition 8 is a sad day and indicative of the work that lies ahead. As we heal from these blows, I would like to challenge us to consider how our struggles are bound up with struggles for racial and economic justice, and how our fight for civil rights, and the health of our communities could be strengthened by taking these connections more seriously. Above all, I would like to challenge us to resist racist media schemes that, during our moment of need and an even greater moment of possibility, are attempting to pit LGBT people and their supporters against communities of color in California.

I apologize for the hasty construction of this, but time is of the essence. I welcome your thoughts.

In struggle,
Adele Carpenter

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. three rivers fog » Excerpted on 20 Nov 2008 at 12:33 pm

    [...] Adele Carpenter Just take the other day. I was exiting a building in a stream of white people who had been able to [...]

  2. On: Prop 8 « black girl blogging. on 21 Nov 2008 at 11:49 am

    [...] have the backlash of White gays blaming black people for the passing of Prop 8. Adele Carpenter at Racialicious said it best: I believe all communities need to be held accountable for their homophobia and [...]

Comments

  1. merq wrote:

    Great post, Adele.

    Did anyone catch Dan Savage on Colbert last night? Talk about a slithery bastard! He came off (even to friends of mine who were angry about the black scapegoating, but unaware that he played a major role in it) as very logical and common-sense-driven.

    Damn, I hate that fucker.

    But the silver lining is that at least, a positive message was put out there — duplicitous or not.

  2. tracy wrote:

    I think using the word homophobia is incorrect. People who voted yes to Prop 8 aren’t automatically homophobic or transphobic. Some of them may be but others just want to protect the definition of marriage.

    Many of them accept homosexuality but aren’t quite ready to give them full marriage status.

    Forget about blame and what the media said.
    70% is a high number. Why did this happen?
    I believe not enough outreach was done in the black community to educate them.

    The fight for civil rights is a long one. Keep working hard one day you’ll succeed.

  3. CVT wrote:

    Well done. I don’t really have any more to add – you hit it on the head. When we decide what rights matter, and which ones don’t, we stop having the right to blame others when we fall short of our goals. Once again, the oh-so-obvious strategy of “Divide and Conquer” has served the establishment well.

  4. Wren wrote:

    this post is so on point

    I have been thinking ever since Nov. 4th when my boss told me as i was headed home (Barack had just won about an hour ago) she opens her mouth and says “I bet your happy about who won, well it actually was kinda bad that so many black voters decided to go out and vote because that’s why Prop 8 is going to pass, ya know cause black people are against gays.”
    -ya know when you here something so dumb and racist that your tongue tide and you gotta take a second to realize how dumb and racist that statement is…

    anyway thank you for bringing up the fact that discrimination from homophobia to racism is still discrimination.

    If people would open their minds to the fact that although the polls may say the “black vote is …” that there are first off a huge amount of African Americans who are gay or who support gay rights and have fought for rights, who of course would vote for the right to marriage, and second off there are just as many ignorant white people who are homophobic as their are of any race.

    In order to make an accurate statement about Prop 8 in concern with “the black vote” someone should first look at the discrimination onto gay people as well as all people of color and see that their is really just one battle to be fought and that is equality. With that said of course their are many complexity’s to why within the black community their is discrimination towards gay people…

    I think it’s ludicrous to use the argument that its not homophobia, its preserving the sacredness of marriage or “protecting the definition of marriage”-in a country with t.v. shows where you compete for a guy or girl to marry-couples get married on a whim-go to vegas drunk and get hitched-women have husband number 6’s-the reality is that this is no longer sacred, and who are you to say that their is only one definition of Love and put that on someone else to limit them…

  5. jvansteppes wrote:

    I think homophobia is the right word in describing the campaign for Prop 8 because it was rife with panic promoting lies, paid for by the Mormon church of course. But homophobia is a problem for heterosexuals across the board,
    especially the white ones in power.

    Thanks for the info about the other propositions. I don’t get how mainstream GLB people never make the connection between queer issues and sex workers’ rights. Sex work rights ARE queer rights in the context that SWs are punished as sexual deviants and there’s so much overlap between the communities, especially the MtF community.

    This is why so many of us aren’t keen on the marriage battle: it doesn’t solve the problems we have with housing, immigration issues, a living wage etc.

  6. Logan wrote:

    As people may have noticed in the other polls, I did a ton of number crunching with the possible data, the real data, and comparisons to other polls on gay marriage. I believe, for the most part, the exit polls on California are correct (barring the Absentee votes, if you actually calculate the rounded percents off (total # of voters * percent of race group * percent of yes voters), the Yes votes are actually 100,000 fewer than what they are, still a deviation of less than 2% off the actual results). The only thing which seems off in the poll is that the votes from Black People in California seems to be over-stated (I figured about 1.25 million give or take eligible black voters in California: the poll numbers would assume roughly 1.1 million showed up, a number too high to be believable, even with Barack running).

    That aside, I do want to say that this is the best piece I’ve read on the whole Prop 8 matter (and outside of Prop K, I was unaware of the other issues on the Cali ballot, although admittedly only Prop 8 had possible effects that would reach outside of California). It makes me think more and more that the reason for the discrepancy here was a successful, if unethical, play on fears by the Pro-Prop-8ters, and a failure by the anti-Prop 8 people to make others realize how much rights are tied together and to inform others of the mistruths of the Pro-Prop-8ters. Ideally, this could serve as a template for plans in the future, or to serve to alert others that there needs to be an outreach on any civil rights issue.

    Adele: I’m actually surprised that post was a hurry job, it was an excellent analysis of the whole situation.

  7. em wrote:

    Adele–, beautifully truthful post. i am passing this along to all the people i’ve been trying to convince in the last week. thank you so much.

  8. tracy wrote:

    I still think it’s dangerous to label all Pro-Prop-8ers (I like that term!) as homophobic. Marriage is still sacred to alot of people (even if that number seems to be getting less and less) and they do support gay rights but just not enough to let them legally marry. The word ‘marriage’ means different things to different people.

    Would you believe me if I said some homophobes voted NO?

    I’ve gotten e-mails saying something like:

    “I hate those gays, I don’t want them anywhere near me! But what they do is their own business and it’s actually unfair to not let them marry as a human and civil rights issue. Just keep them away from me!”

  9. basbleu wrote:

    tracy – ‘Protect the definition of marriage’ from WHO? It’s absolutely homophobic.

    Well put, Adele. There’s a lot of work to be done in understanding the power relations between the overlapping queer and minority communities. Everyone who voted yes on Prop 8 deserves the blame, but we should be able to talk about that without scapegoating minorities.

  10. brownstocking wrote:

    Thank you. I wish more opponents of 8 could speak this clearly, without the vitriol and blame. May I link to this?

  11. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @brownstocking –

    Of course. This was an open letter Adele wrote, and it was designed to be circulated. Just make sure you credit her as the author.

  12. Lola wrote:

    I would agree with the article only in the sense that many organizations are asking, “Where were they [Queer community] on May 1st?” and other questions of the sort. It is true that LGBTq orgs sometimes fail to make alliances, at the same time other orgs fail to make it a safe place for LGBTQ folks to get involved.
    Also, and while this point was lightly mentioned, it is unfair to assume LGBTQ people are not getting involved in other actions, are not holding discussions about other things. It is unfair to assume that, just because I may not look like what one would come to expect from a queer woman, or because I do not go to rallies and demonstrations with rainbow flags, I am leaving my identity as a queer woman at the door.
    I am an immigrant queer woman of color who was hoping that prop 8 did not pass.
    I am nauseated by the fact that I heard from other queer people of color saying that prop 8 was not their battle and that they do not support “those people”.
    I have an intersectional identity, I was at the October 31st action against the ICE raids, I was helping inform my community about the importance of defeating prop 6 and 9; and I was also marching with other LGBTQ folks (of different ages and ethnic backgrounds) and allies on Friday night after prop 8 passed.

  13. Jess wrote:

    I did a post on DailyKos about this :

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/11/12/75832/151/320/659707

    but basically, the point is that there needed to be a ground game on the part of LGBT people and it didn’t happen, and this conservative reaching out to the black/latino vote was part of a strategy of divide and conquer that’s been in place for a long time.

    There’s a lot of data to suggest that while most black Americans — especially those in Evangelical churches — oppose gay marriage, that doesn’t mean they support prohibiting it automatically. That’s an important distinction to make.

    The ground game helped get Obama elected, and it can do just as well against referenda like prop 8 — but you have to be in the game. You can’t start your campaign 1 month before the vote and expect to win.

    If anything, the indicator that showed people voting for prop 8 was education levels — just like it is in every other state with a similar proposal on the ballot. The biggest margins for prop 8 were in one of the whitest — and least educated — counties like Modoc and Lake.

  14. Jess wrote:

    And if y’all don’t mind Latoya said it was OK above to another) I linked to this because it’s really, really good.

  15. Cara wrote:

    I just wanted to send you guys the link to Dan Savages Colbert interview. He is really foney! He put the blog message out there….and waited for ppl response. Then he goes on the air and pretends like the rebuttle to this type of reaction was his idea….gross!

    url: http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=210299

  16. L. wrote:

    Cara,

    This is exactly why people should stop giving this man that much credit. If you hadn’t known of his blog post, you would think this was his main argument all along. And I don’t know if Colbert was in character when he said he didn’t agree with gay marriage (although I doubt because he didn’t look like it and he’s very active in his own church and is a youth, although that really doesn’t prove anything), but I found it odd that he (maybe?) openly admitted to being against gay-marriage yet Dan didn’t direct any type of accusations or anger towards him, or better towards the white community.

  17. Free wrote:

    True words Adele. I know a gay man from Florida who is in his 60s. While watching George Takei and Brad Altman being interviewed about the passage of Prop 8. Mr. W. wondered, “Why do those gays want marriage?”

    I was surprised, especially by “those gays.” But then I thought about it : a man in his 60s who grew up closeted, married, divorced and then with enough courage came out. That’s the past, and for some, it’s still the same (some remain closeted). Mr. W. doesn’t relate at all to gay activism or being open about gay relationships. It made me wonder how many gays who are closeted and/or post 40 years of age, voted for Prop 8 as well as the Florida ballot measure that amended the constitution to ban civil unions and limit marriage to same sex couples only. I didn’t ask Mr. W about his Florida vote, but I imagine that he voted yes because he didn’t understand that marriage is part of our social system and (like it or not) confers status.

  18. Jayme wrote:

    This is great. I think it is tough to see people support one movement and not another, in a seemingly contradictory way. However, this does not usually come out of a malicious intent to only support one community and intentionally oppress others but rather the realities of time constraints for people earning and living and (especially in the Bay) flushing it down the rent toilet. For example, I know several anarchists living in the mission who fail to really unpack their role in gentrification which is troubling to see the lack of self-critique.

    Thank you for calling these subtleties regarding the most recent ballot. I just moved from the Bay to Massachusetts for college and I wish I could have voted on a lot of the bills you mentioned. But ah well.

    keep up the insightful writing. it is really inspiring to a student testing the waters of culturally analytical journalism. (is that even a term? haha)

    in struggle,
    jayme

  19. Ashley wrote:

    Great post. I really appreciate your words.

  20. Sewere wrote:

    Why the hell didn’t Colbert have Pam Spaulding or Keith Boykin instead of Savage?

  21. Jaye wrote:

    Adele – On the one hand, it is disappointing that one minority group would vote to limit the rights of another…at the same time, you point out that it is much more complicated than that, goes back and forth between the two groups…and that of course, being in one group doesn’t mean you aren’t also part of the other.

    You really put the issues into context and connected them all. Very well written.

  22. Lyonside wrote:

    Work doesn’t let me post here anymore, so forgive the delay…
    ————
    >I think using the word homophobia is incorrect. People who voted yes to Prop 8 aren’t automatically homophobic or transphobic. Some of them may be but others just want to protect the definition of marriage.

    HRMMMM….. REAAALLLLY…. (in my best “Church Lady” voice).

    Let’s take this one apart, shall we?

    In this nation, you do not have to be “married” in a religious institution in order to be “married” under the law.

    Otherwise, no atheists, agnostics, those w/ no formal religion, those with a religion that does not have a physical structure, those with a religion with no defined spiritual leader, or those whose religioun does not mandate a ceremony in a religious structure by a reliigous official etc. would not get married.

    Sea captains, judges, etc. could not perform marriages.

    But we allow civil marriages all the time, and we allow clergy of ANY faith or denomination, who is registered appropriately, to perform ceremonies as both religious and CIVIL authorities.

    When I got married, the priest at the ceremony could have said all the right things at all the right times, and everyone involved could have too… BUT the marriage would NOT have been valid under the LAW until 1) the 2 parties involved had registered for a marriage license from our County Clerk’s office, and 2) the celebrant (who happened to be religious clergy but didn’t have to be) signed/stamped the license and sent it back to the COUNTY.

    After which, the COUNTY retroactsthe legal, civil benefits of marriage back to the date of the ceremony.

    What are the civil benefits of marriage?

    See here: http://community.pflag.org/Page.aspx?pid=551

    Where is religion in any part of this?

    What role does religion play in declaring who gets ANY of the civil rights listed above?

    If someone claims that they are against CIVIL HETEROSEXUAL marriage at the same time as they are against CIVIL HOMOSEXUAL marriage, I will not call them a hypocrite.

    I will, however, demand that they opt out of all civil local, state, and federal benefits of their marriage, if they are or ever will be married.

    Because what one particular religion claims to say about “marriage” should have no effect on what the law says about “marriage,” in a free society, any more than what a religioun says about “shellfish” should affect the fishing industry or the menu at Red Lobster.

  23. brownstocking wrote:

    In one sense, I’m glad Colbert addressed it in his “subversive” way. Dan Savage still needs to be slapped silly. If I had the energy.

    So, what are the responses to Nate Silver’s article? http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/prop-8-myths.html

  24. Joseph wrote:

    @Lyonside (#22)
    Cosign.

    Hereafter known as the “Red Lobster Defense.”

    Brilliant.

  25. RJ Taylor wrote:

    We need to continue educating all people.
    Blaming any one group only brings us further from our goal.

  26. NancyP wrote:

    Excellent post – I had no idea that there were those other initiatives in CA (I am in the Midwest).

    I think it is perfectly understandable that at crunch time the gay community works on the amendments, initiatives, etc that directly affect them – there aren’t that many LGBTs, and (as in any group) few are serious activists. Non-LGBTs are not likely to sign up as activists for LGBT issues at election time, so it behooves us to use our volunteer power for our own issues close to the election – and free up some of us who may be activists for other issues due to “intersectionality” or special expertise.

    That doesn’t mean that there isn’t time and energy to devote to other issues during the rest of the election cycle. Self-education should be undertaken, support should be offered, and alliances made during ordinary legislative sessions and other events.

    BTW, it does seem amazing that LGBTs wouldn’t understand sex work decriminalization (for adults only) as a pertinent issue, given the number of destitute young adults who turn to this to survive.

  27. Kirsten wrote:

    This is a really amazing website. I just came across it via other sites talking about prop 8 ( http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8009
    and
    http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/07/lets-not-blame-the-brown/), and all I can think is: “THIS is the kind of media I want to be reading! THIS is insightful analysis.”

    I’m in Canada, but despite the stereotypes, we are a country moving far to the right, and the crap that our national paper spouts is terrible. I really wish that articles like this were given the kind of space that all the boring, reactionary writing out there gets. Until/if/whenever that happens, I am very happy that this website exists.

    Thank you so much,
    Kirsten

  28. Joah wrote:

    Truth be told, Black voters did impact the result of Prop 8. Obama wasn’t able to increase voter turnout amongst Black voters in any record-breaking fashion as many expected, but in California the turnout against same-sex marriage was notable mostly because no matter how much the blame should be shared, Black voters decided to be on the wrong side. If Black voters turned out in support of blocking Prop 8 then this would be a great story, but voters chose to follow poor logic and religious rhetoric.

  29. barbara wrote:

    I don’t understand how the blame can be placed anywhere. I was taught to vote my ideals. Has the thought occurred that these people voted that way because of what they believe, does that make them wrong and you right or you wrong and them right? Neither, campaign harder maybe you sway them maybe you won’t but placing blame is not going to help anything. There has been so much crying in the news about blame from McCain aides to this. Grow up.

  30. Fatemeh wrote:

    Adele, thanks for writing this. I was extremely saddened to hear that Prop 8 passed, and have come back from a week in Denmark to find that there is a “war between gays and blacks” in the aftermath of its passing, which only saddens me more. (sad sigh)

  31. browne wrote:

    That poll wasn’t even true.

    http://laeastside.com/2008/11/aha-more-on-prop-8/

  32. Sobia wrote:

    @Lyonside #22:

    Cosign as well. Well said!

  33. Msday wrote:

    Why is it that black people are supposed to maintain no other opinions than those of oppressed people? Just because there has been a history of racial injustices against blacks does not mean that they should turn a blind eye and vote contrary to their religious beliefs . The majority of blacks have a history of affiliation with fundamentalism, the pentecostal church and/or the baptist church.
    Why would anyone expect them to vote
    any differently.

  34. CaliM wrote:

    What I find interesting, in defending minorities, we continue to ignore the fact that the majority of people in California who voted for prop 8 were white….not black or latino. This idea that blacks “pushed it over” is completely illogical. Blacks were not the deciding factor….whites were. It amazes me that the news media promoted the idea that we’re now living in a post-racism world while at the same time blaming blacks for prop 8 passing, despite blacks representing a mere 3-13% of the residents of most California counties.