Another Hollywood Remake: Oldboy

by Latoya Peterson

Director Chan-Wook Park shocked the hell out of South Korean audiences in 2003, with his theatrical release Oldboy, the second film in the disturbing The Vengence trilogy.

Now, dear readers, I hate horror movies but I love psychological thrillers. Hence, I watched Oldboy. And while I really enjoyed the movie, it is definitely *not* for the faint of heart or weak of stomach. So, imagine my surprise while perusing Dramabeans to see a post describing how Will Smith is going to star in the US remake.

Javabeans, main poster on the blog, is not pleased.

The bastardization of Korean films by Hollywood is annoying, but I can close my eyes and forget about them because they have largely failed to make any sort of impact.

But this upsets me, and not because I’m protective of Oldboy or anything particular to the film itself. Although I do think they’ve picked an ambitious project, it’s more that this is the straw that broke the camel’s back.

What pisses me off is that there’s this growing sense that somehow Hollywood is the end-all and be-all of everything, EVAR, and that somehow everything good must be purchased and repackaged and buffed and relabeled with the Hollywood stamp. God, Hollywood, YOU DON’T HAVE TO PUT YOUR THUMB IN EVERY SINGLE GODDAMN PIE.

Can’t you leave some things alone? Why do you always have to wave your dick in everyone’s face and assume we will marvel at its size? Is that crude? Well, I find your brash cultural insensitivity crude. It’s not the remaking itself that I take issue with — nothing intrinsically wrong with adaptations of stories — but the arrogant, careless attitude with which you scour the international markets for more carcasses to pick to feed your own bloated ego. Why do you seem to think that nothing is complete until you have co-opted it for your own commercial gain?

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Better yet, if it ain’t broke, DON’T BREAK IT.

Suddenly, the conversation over there got a lot more interesting. Now, I have enjoyed a great many films from overseas and I understand a lot of the frustration when Hollywood decides to remake a movie – generally speaking, they fuck it up. While The Departed was a decent remake (and it was received well – the theater I watched it in gave a standing ovation to the credits) Infernal Affairs (the original) is the better movie. I could write volumes on the difference between the emotional mood and the treatment of the characters in each film, but suffice it to say, I enjoy a lot of complexity in characters – something that tends to get stripped out in the Hollywood versions.

However, javabeans post touched on more than just irritation at a potentially shoddy remake – the comments section quickly became a discussion of the globalization of media and cultural borrowing.

annonymous – Nov 7, 2008 at 12:32 pm

well I dunno. While I do agree that the majority of these Korean remakes (or any other remake of a foreign media) have been pretty bad I don’t think it’s to the extent that has made you so mad. Most likely a lot of the people involved in putting out these movies are out there just to make an easy buck, but I’m sure that some of the creative staff honestly just wants to share a good story to an audience who may not have heard or will even had a chance to see the original and because of that maybe these people will be encouraged to see the original. That’s what happened to me when I saw “Shall we dance?”

Granted the other movies were flops (the originals weren’t that great either imo), but I think that if people like Steven Spielberg and Will Smith do get involved with this project, it will be given the due respect and effort that these other movies lacked. Ugly Betty is a remake too and I love that show to bits and pieces (and although I never saw the original I wish I could), I don’t really see a show like Ugly Betty being an ugly thing that Hollywood has made to show the world it’s better than anything else. And let’s not forget that Old Boy is based off a Japanese manga. I’m sure a lot of manga purists probably didn’t appreciate it being adapted into a movie when it first came out in Korea.

I plan on keeping an open mind and treating these remakes on a case by case basis. The remakes aren’t being made by the same people everytime so I don’t think it’s really fair to write off something that could potentially be really good.

Ivuson – Nov 7, 2008 at 1:07 pm

NOW you notice!?!

Sincerely,

Japan

But in all seriousness this isn’t anything new. Hollywoods been hijacking films ever since there has been a Hollywood. They are sooooooo creativity starved that most films that come out these days are either remakes of foreign films or cannibalized versions of their OWN earlier films. All the hacks in Hollywood see something good and instantaneously think that they can do it bigger AND better.

Let’s look at Will Smith(40 btw) for a small microcosm of how desperate Hollywood is for material. He alone has been in two remakes, two sequels, and three based on true story films. The lack of originality is palpable.

The fact that they’re now stealing from Korean films as well, if anything, is a sign of how strong the Hallyu movement has become. The sincerest form of flattery is imitation and there is no bigger “flatterer” than Hollywood.

#
18 Liv – Nov 7, 2008 at 1:07 pm

If Hollywood ever credited the markets that they stol…. AHEM borrowed their ideas from, so that people could watch the (infinitely better) original and at least give a chance to the original actors to get more international exposure too, I wouldnt be as irritated by their bastardi.. AHEM remakes. However, since they present every idea …”taken” from an international market as their own super original clever cute idea that our wonderful screenwriters came up with, its a lose lose situation all around. The original actors dont get credit or exposure, the original idea loses reputation/credit due to being associated with the remade flop, and the remake…sucks. If you notice though, when they are remaking films from the American market, credit is always given where its due – in fact, the American originals often experience renewed popularity because people say “hmmm I’ll watch the original just to make sure it wasnt as crap as the remake”……

Alysha – Nov 7, 2008 at 2:05 pm

Why does Hollywood remake everything?

It’s not Hollywood that is remaking everything for a profit, it’s the dumb American audience. I won’t speak for us all, but the majority of English speaking Americans don’t feel like sitting in a theater for an hour and a half having to read subtitles or spend time thinking about the hidden meaning in many foreign films. They go for one to two hours of entertainment, end point.

It’s lame that Hollywood releases soo many remakes a year, but like someone above has already stated, it’s been like that since the beginning of “Hollywood”. But as every movie lover already knows, the original will ALWAYS be superior to the remake, and many times there are people that didn’t even know the new movie was a remake and in turn it sheds light on the original, bringing in a completely new audience to love and adore the first film.

Lisa – Nov 7, 2008 at 2:17 pm

Okay, this is going to sound racist, but it’s not how I mean it.

One of the most superb moments in Old Boy is that realization at the end of the movie (don’t want to spoil anything so won’t be specific)… which is in part such a surprise because of the very amazing casting job done to, um, make it less obvious… as in, the girl in the movie doesn’t automatically trigger you to think she’s a certain age, or has a certain resemblance to anyone else in the movie.

I know this is going to sound bad, but seriously, Will Smith and a 20 something african-american girl is going to be super obvious…I feel like I would automatically make the association (I’m not saying black people look alike at all, but they have to strike a casting balance between plausible resemblance and not obvious resemblance… and race is still such a huge issue in America, so I think it would just be blatant).

also… Old Boy is like, a cinematic and philosophical masterpiece in a multi-dimensional sense… remaking it would be pointless and blatant opportunism

belleza – Nov 7, 2008 at 2:34 pm

It bothers everybody when Hollywood remakes Asian product, but it doesn’t bother anybody when China, Korea, and Japan repeatedly makes each other product, or when C/J/K-pop remakes each other country’s (and America’s) music? Where was everybody when Japan remade My Sassy Girl? How would people feel if we say that Hana Yori Dango shouldn’t be made into a Korean show because it’s a JAPANESE story?!? Or when Korea remade Grey’s Anatomy and CSI, where was the outcry there?

And what about that Hollywood has remade product from the UK, France, and other countries for 50 years? Should I avoid the Magnificent Seven, because it ain’t as good as Seven Samurai? Should I stop watching American Idol because it’s a remake of another country’s show. Where was everybody when Abre Los Ojos was remade with Tom Cruise? Or when Steven Soderbergh remade Tartovsky’s Solaris, one of the greatest science fiction movies of all time?

As for the Departed . . . in some ways, it improved on the original concept. The writing in the Departed perfectly, perfectly represents the ethnography of working class Boston, which itself is still a rare subject in American cinema. The script was hilarious. Leonardo Dicaprio’s shell-shocked character better reflects the psychological reality of undercover work among truly dangerous, despicable people. Finally, one of the greatest influences on HK hard-boiled cinema happened to be Martin Scorsese.

I’m sure Oldboiiiii will suck. If there was to be a remake, it would be made by Haneke or Von trier. Steven Speilburg is completely, completely wrong for the project. Completely. Wrong.

“And as Shaenna said, why not just play the original? Maybe this is still difficult in America.”

There’s a limited audience (mostly in urban places) for foreign cinema in America. However, Korean cinema (esp. post-Oldboy) is actually getting a lot of distribution here. (And Korean horror is now bigger than Japanese horro at your local Blockbuster. Hello Kobe!! ;) )

Remakes actually improves the visibility of the domestic product, and it creates curiosity. Also, the domestic country (in this case, Korea) usually view it as flattering as well as a way to help promote their work overseas.

“Here in Europe, people have been watching translated american movies for very long.”

That’s even true for China/TW/HK audience and Chinese movies. I was used to it until I started watching foreign films in college; now it’s hard to go back. In fact, it was only relatively recent (say the last 30 years) that most non-Western countries were showing domestic and foreign movies where the audio wasn’t overdubbed.

39 javabeans – Nov 7, 2008 at 3:26 pm
I both agree and disagree with belleza.

First, the superfluous remakes are always annoying whether they are inter-Asian or not. I think the inter-Asian ones have a general appreciation for the originals that Hollywood doesn’t, however, and many of the key cultural elements show better potential for being preserved.

And just because they’re common doesn’t mean I have to like ‘em or can’t be annoyed when another one comes along. “It’s not new, so don’t complain now” has never been an argument that flies with me.

gallivanter – Nov 7, 2008 at 7:23 pm

I really feel like we’re starting to get to the point of entertainment globalization in America. YES it sucks–a lot–that Hollywood is remaking Oldboy, BUT I just can’t see them continuing to do on such a regular basis, 5, 10 years in the future. Look at all us. Who knows how many people visit this blog to discuss Kdramas each day. A LOT. And there’s even more over at Soompi and D-Addicts. The drama group has grown SO much in the last 5 years. It’s not the size of Anime addicts, but it’s getting up there.

In Seattle, my hometown, the number of foreign films to come here has grown tremendously. We host a foreign film festival every year and if you want tickets, you have to buy them in the first couple days now. Everything sells out. Even the more mainstream theatres in the city has at least one or two foreign films now. Americans are slowly coming around to the idea of “foreignness” in mainstream culture. It’s going to take time, yes, but I think we will get there.

I’m going to stop here, but the conversation continued for quite a bit over on Dramabeans.

At any rate, I’ll be keeping tabs on this Will Smith remake, and will definitely add an in a post on cinema to our future discussions on appropriation.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. A collection of musings. at Siddity in the City on 12 Nov 2008 at 7:40 am

    [...] an unrelated note: The shittacular remake-to-be that is the American stab at Oldboy is now rumored to have Stephen Spielberg at the helm and feature Will Smith in the [...]

Comments

  1. Mammith wrote:

    Ugh, I greatly dislike Oldboy (love Sympathy for Lady Vengeance though) but the idea of a remake really annoys me.

    The post by that girl Lisa is interesting, i can see what she means to be honest. In a country where if you have a POC leading you HAVE TO ABSOLUTELY have most other charecters be white (unless its a ‘black film’), the twist might be a bit obvious if they are both AA.

    In Korea, near enough everyone is Korean so you wouldn’t really be thinking that. then again, Hollywood may just cut that aspect out of the film altogether as then they can’t get the rating down low enough to make the big bucks.

    They’re also remaking Akira, but of what I’ve read about the remake it may actually be good. It sounds utterly bizzare, with a lot of Asian cast members in main and not only peripheral roles, so we’ll just have to wait and see there.

  2. atlasien wrote:

    I don’t get mad about remakes, rip-offs or homages. Take, for example, Kurosawa… he was very influenced by John Ford Westerns, and ended up making movies that in turn became influences for American filmmakers.

    What does make me angry is the lack of roles for Asian-American actors. Every time a movie from Asia gets remade, it’s not just adapted to American cultural norms… it’s de-Asianified. That’s a separate issue from the cultural borrowing.

  3. SR wrote:

    I was completely disgusted and ashamed when Bollywood ripped off Oldboy to make Zinda.

    The discourse between national cinemas and Hollywood is intriguing. South Korean cinema competes with Hollywood by limiting the number of American movies that screen in their theaters. On the other hand, Bollywood competes with Hollywood by copying plots from Hollywood films.

  4. Jessie wrote:

    I know this is going to sound bad, but seriously, Will Smith and a 20 something african-american girl is going to be super obvious…I feel like I would automatically make the association (I’m not saying black people look alike at all, but they have to strike a casting balance between plausible resemblance and not obvious resemblance… and race is still such a huge issue in America, so I think it would just be blatant).

    I don’t understand Lisa’s comment at all. Is she assuming Will Smith and this other girl are going to be the only black people in the movie? What??

  5. Madame Zenobia wrote:

    I am in a state of WTF over this. After seeing last night’s episode of “Heroes” and nearly throwing my television out the window, I have to read THIS? Oldboy was/IS an awesome film that doesn’t need to be touched or retouched. What Hollywood needs to do is get some originality and come up with their own classics and stop jacking the Asian markets for their cinematic-awesomeness.

    Thanks for the posts. I’ll have to visit/bookmark that site. You’ve only reignited my interest in these films and now I must add them to my Netflix queue again. :) Thanks.

  6. UGLY PUNK GURL! wrote:

    People are morons. Leave OldBoy alone.

    they can go ahead and remake it many times (and ruin the essence of the story.. yeah incest will totally fly in america.. NOT!) but there will only be ONE OldBoy.

  7. Ike wrote:

    What really upset me was when Hollywood remade Infernal Affairs into The Departed, and they added a bunch of anti-Asian racism into the script. That just seems ungrateful, unnecessary, and slightly reminiscent of colonialization. There’s an old post on Racialicious about this:
    http://www.racialicious.com/2006/10/09/the-departed-full-of-racist-asian-stereotypes/
    That said, my family loves Will Smith, so we’re probably going to see the movie no matter what, making us part of the problem. Hey, we even saw Hancock.

  8. akoma wrote:

    NNOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is probably the worst news I’ve heard all week.

  9. Mammith wrote:

    @Jessie: Not a hard assumption to make considering the ethnic make-up of most Hollywood films. If they did do that then it’d make sense and the twist would work, but the likelihood of a producer greenlighting a majority AA cast in a non-’specialist’ movie is near enough zero.

  10. Matt wrote:

    I think it’s probably worth noting that Korea has spent the better part of its history dealing with colonialism – either from Japan, China, or the US. I think most of the Korean immigrants I know would probably be proud their country had produced something Hollywood saw fit to copy. (It’s not like Dokdo Island, which every Korean knows is one of the most beautiful Islands in Korea.) But I’d try to be pretty careful doing such a thing.

  11. Diana wrote:

    I have a feeling if they remade OLDBOY, they’d tone it down or change the “surprise” ending altogether so as not to shock more “puritan” minded American audiences. That would not be cool. I also don’t see Will Smith as OLDBOY–they’d really have to market that well. As a film enthusiast, I don’t mind remakes so much if I am aware it is a remake so I can look for the original and compare. But if the filmmaker is just remaking the film to dumb the story down for American audiences, then I’d rather they just leave it alone.

  12. Arturo wrote:

    Utterly heinous. And good luck writing your way outta that plot corner! What’s next, Kate Bosworth in the Lady Vengeance remake?

    Actually, I should stop giving them ideas …

  13. Cara wrote:

    OMG…please NO!!!!! They are sooooo gonna get this wrong! Why!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  14. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @Arturo –

    Actually, they bought the rights to Lady Vengance already. It is supposed to be a Charlize Theron vehicle. They announced that earlier this year.

  15. MK wrote:

    It’s been pretty obvious for awhile now that Hollywood is only interested in one thing: $$$. Who cares about artistic integrity and originality?
    Oh, and so-called “progressive” Hollywood will continue to find ways to screw over actors of color, whether putting them into stereotypical roles or ignoring them altogether, rather opting for the beautiful white actors. Because, that’s who American audiences can identify with the most, right? I think that’s one reason they continue to remake foreign films; it’s a story they like, but they must think we the audience are a stupid lot, not being able to read subtitles and watching non-American actors. The horror.
    While there is nothing really wrong with liking one of these Asian remakes (just like there is nothing wrong with liking any movie, really), how many people have actually seen the original (or for that matter, know it even exists?). Would they watch it or avoid it because of the subtitles and Asian actors, two things absent from most of what Hollywood pukes out yearly.

  16. lakergrrl wrote:

    So I just wiki-ed Oldboy. Sounds… freaky. But I have to totally disgree with Lisa. Will smiths dauhgter could be mixed Would that still be too “obvious” ?

    http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/mixedtwins.asp

  17. leftofemma wrote:

    I really can’t see Will Smith taking on that plot twist unless he wants to ruin his career. US audiences aren’t ready for that.

    And, I agree with what most of the other commentors have said – unless the cast is all black or extremely mixed, they’re not going to be able to pull off the ending. I also don’t think that Speilburg can be subtle enough to unleash the twist at the end.

    While I liked the movie, I have no real allegiance to it. However, I think that it’s going to be a horrible remake.

  18. beka wrote:

    Every time a movie from Asia gets remade, it’s not just adapted to American cultural norms… it’s de-Asianified. That’s a separate issue from the cultural borrowing.
    Thank you, atlasien!

    Disclaimer: Singapore doesn’t have a film output of enough quality to ever be remade, at least not now. And I don’t really watch Asian films that much.

    Nonetheless, Western interpretations/remakes often gall. While Ho Minfong’s Sing to the Dawn – this is from my own experience – doesn’t, in my opinion, really merit the glorification it has gained in school literature classes, it’s still a local text of some significance. The computer-animated adaptation, though, was run by a Briton, and it tells – more European looks to the main characters, the addition of martial arts, and a plethora of Disney-like songs.

    In short, these are the main problems I have with the remakes:

    1) The “de-Asianification” of the original, including the lack of original context.

    2) Why can’t they screen the original, if the original was superior?

    Not everything has to be in the context of the Western experience.

    What one of the commenters said reflects the heart of the issue best:

    The writing in the Departed perfectly, perfectly represents the ethnography of working class Boston, which itself is still a rare subject in American cinema.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but The Departed was an adaption of Infernal Affairs, and Infernal Affairs was never freaking meant to be about “the ethnography of working class Boston”. Everything becomes West-centric and revolves around something entirely different from the original context! That really bugs me.

    Not saying there aren’t good remakes, just taking issue with how the remake thing typically plays out.

  19. Marcus Kwame wrote:

    I’m surprised more people didn’t comment on the manner in which Asian people have been written out of these remakes. To me, the ugliest part of this phenomenon is Hollywood’s belief that American audiences won’t be able to connect with a protagonist who is not American. And unfortunately a lot of Americans probably would pass on a movie with Asian protagonists (non-martial arts related) due to racism, lack of familiarity or ignorance. But Hollywood only enforces those attitudes by writing Asian people out of their own films. Sometimes when you challenge people they will surprise you, but I guess we’ll never know in this case.

  20. Kaonashi wrote:

    Ugh, hate remakes in general. And I especially hate Asian remakes; it seems like the only two that were remade decently were The Ring (even though the commericals pretty much gave away the twist at the end, idiots) and The Grudge.

    For once I want to see a remake that is actually the original film with the foreword: “This is the original film. Learn how to read subtitles, you lazy shits!”

  21. S's mom wrote:

    I’ve seen the original Ugly Betty–or parts of it anyway–and one difference is that in the Americanized Ugly Betty, the main character is still an Hispanic woman. Plus the creator and a co-producer are Hispanic.

  22. Arturo wrote:

    Latoya:

    BWAHAHA, didn’t know about Theron as Lady Vengeance. Can I call dibs on the “Aeon Sux” headline now?

  23. MK wrote:

    Exactly. Hollywood most definitely does not believe American audiences can identify with many non-white actors.
    It all goes hand in hand: Hollywood wants to white-wash everything, and audiences typically seem to go along with it. Movies with beautiful white actors make bank, while many non-whites are still pigeonholed into the same old shit. Audiences could care less.
    Here’s something: Martial-arts movies have generally done well in the US, giving Asian actors exposure, albeit stereotypical and repetitive. Would a drama or comedy or thriller starring Asian actors do as well? My gut says no, because American audiences just don’t seem interested in seeing non-white actors in roles of depth. Then Hollywood sees this trend, and, well, we all know the rest.
    Pure Hollywood hypocrisy.

  24. napthia9 wrote:

    MK: “Would a drama or comedy or thriller starring Asian actors do as well?”

    Call me a stupid optimist, but my gut says yes. Harold and Kumar, while it has flaws, appears to have done rather well. Over at the Hathor Legacy, there are a couple of posts speculating on why Hollywood doesn’t make more movies that pass the Bechdel test.* The idea was that since Hollywood higher-ups can’t accurately predict which movie will be a success and why, they use stereotypes about their audience instead. (Ex: They make up reasons for why something they didn’t expect to be popular was, then they explain away crappy movies that risked something by blaming American’s apathy/idiocy/bigotry. And when things don’t fit, it’s a fluke or proof that you can’t make movies that are too risky.) That way Hollywood doesn’t have to think too hard about what they’ll greenlight next.

    This seems to make a lot of sense to me re: non-white protagonists in genres currently dominated by white actors. There are Americans who wouldn’t or would be less likely to see a movie with non-white protagonists, but that’s not all Americans. And Hollywood isn’t even trying, ‘cos they’re already so sure that it would be impossible to change.

  25. MK wrote:

    Good points, napthia9. Yes, as much as Hollywood stereotypes actors and whatnot, they also tend to stereotype we the viewers.
    Part of me doesn’t think Hollywood cares about who actually goes to see the movies, just as long as they make more and more money for themselves. They give people what they THINK they want, and that often includes tired stereotypes and caricatures.

  26. CVT wrote:

    Normally, I would probably get pissed off about something like this. And it IS annoying.

    But I know too much about how Hollywood movies are made now (my brother is a screenwriter), and it goes like this: Hollywood producers have absolutely NO interest in original work. 90% of the scripts paid for and intended for film are rip-offs of some sort: novels, short stories, comics, older movies, foreign films, plays . . .

    I mean, Hell – the Incredible Hulk movie that came out this last spring was a re-make of the Hulk movie that came out in 2003 (only five year’s previous) which was a rip-off of the tv show from two decades before that which was based on the comic book.

    I could do a similar run-down of almost every big movie that’s been made in the last ten years.

    So – this time – it’s not about race. It’s about the lack of creativity (and lack of RESPECT for creativity) in Hollywood right now. Producers are too scared to try something new, so they stick to what worked before – in the U.S. or otherwise.

    In other facets of Hollywood film-making? All about race – but that’s a discussion for another time and place.

  27. CVT wrote:

    Regarding the “white-washing” of Hollywood film:

    I have heard so many stories of revisions of scripts made by Hollywood producers based on “what the audience wants/can understand” that I can now say, definitively, that Hollywood producers are some of the most ignorant, stupidest, bigoted, and self-centered people in the world. And, since they are so self-centered, they expect the rest of the American movie-going audience to be like them.

    Thus – the films that we see make it to the theaters. I swear to you all – it is definitely NOT the writers’ fault.

  28. Lleeo wrote:

    I’m going to have to look up a synopsis of this Oldboy movie to get enough context to comment on that but I would like to comment on something related to this post.

    I am a fan of suspense movies and psychological thrillers and sometimes these kinds of movies are labelled as horror, to I have tended to watch quite a few of the recent Asian horror remakes. I thought the Ring was really well done, for example. However, many of the other remakes have one disturbing aspect in common: the movie features all Caucasian actors except for the creepy ghost creatures. These “creatures” are always Asian.

    Talk about demonizing the Asian “Other.”

    @Latoya: I would recomment watching the Asian film A Tale of Two Sisters; it’s a complex psychological thriller which deals with some pretty deep themes and is also very creepy and suspensful. By the end, I was still trying to figure out what had gone on.

  29. RChoudh wrote:

    @ Lleeo

    Yeah I agree with what you’re saying about the “Asian ghosts”. Just over this past summer I kept seeing commercials for some ghost movie ( I don’t know if it was a remake of an older Asian film) where the white couple is being terrorized by an Asian ghost. The man was responsible for this happening as his wife seemed to be accusing him of somehow causing the ghost to be angry (how he did that I don’t know because I wasn’t interested in seeing this film). It almost seemed like they were stereotyping Asian women as being obsessed with white men to the point where they would even haunt them after death! Such themes are too reminscent of Madame Butterfly and Miss Saigon.

  30. Beth wrote:

    Actually, the film version of Oldboy is very different from the manga and stands on its own.

    I think the issue here is that Americans get very little exposure to films from other countries. Very few are translated, and most end up straight on DVD. Even fewer make it into small independent theaters in large cities. We are ignorant of other cultures, and Hollywood reinforces that.

    Oldboy, as a Korean film, just will not translate into a Hollywood film. It is inherently Korean, and that cannot be redone for America. Roger Ebert said in his review, America is too puritanical for Oldboy. A Hollywood blockbuster remake will reject (or glorify) the violence and cruelty without truly understanding the original film’s realism and humanity.

  31. Baedol wrote:

    Just an FYI about the original manga: the original ‘Oldboy’ manga was actually not very popular until the film was released and received so much attention, when suddenly everyone became interested and a reprint was issued. Plus, apart from the idea that a man is imprisoned for a long time then released for no apparent reason, a good deal of the story differs (i.e. the plot twist is completely different, Park Chan-wook came up with that himself). I don’t really see Oldboy as an adaptation, more a ‘loosely-based’ kind of film.

  32. Logan wrote:

    Personal favorite moment: The post after someone brings up that the Korean Old Boy was a remake of a Japanese Manga (which was inkling in my head cause I remember it being based off of such) with the “NOW YOU NOTICE. Sincerely, Japan.” Had me belly laughing in the office to try to not draw attention to the goofing off I’m doing.

    Anyways, racism aside, Hollywood is all about the money. Critical acclaimed films aside, the number one concern in a relatively busting Hollywood economy is about making money, since from my knowledge of Hollywood economics, a movie has to earn in theatres about twice its cost to produce it to make its money back (before DVD sales of course which is how many flops manage to break even, but those will wane in a recessing economy), and that most movies, even with DVDs, don’t make their money back. Its why the _____ Movie series keeps coming out, because its a cheap movie with a niche audience who will make the overall movie profitable even if the movies end up ruining the parody genre.

    And really, again racial issues aside (cause the anger I’m sensing seems more to be at Hollywood “bastardizing” classic flicks rather than Hollywood bleaching Asian cinema), who cares about the legacy the remake leaves? This is a serious question, what person is going to say that the Hitchcock Psycho sucks because the remade Psycho was horrible? Did Superman 1 and 2 get thrown under the bus because of Superman Returns (technically a remake, hence why I didn’t include 3 and 4). Did The Exorcist remake destroy the legacy of the original Exorcist? I mean, seriously, fine, Hollywood is acting like Hollywood, what the fuck does it really matter? Who is really harmed by this? If anything, the original creators and movies will prosper because of the remakes.

    I’ll use a personal example to illustrate this. My personal favorite novel is the San Guo Yan Yi/Romance of the Three Kingdoms. My personal favorite era of history is the period around the fall of the Han Dynasty and the beginning of the Jin Dynasty. I am in China teaching right now primarily because I want to learn the language so I can read ancient Chinese and go to grad school to study the causes and effects of this era. You want to know what started this whole path, what opened up a completly new life for me? A video game for the NES called Destiny of an Emperor. The game was a mostly retelling (some can call it a bastardization) of the SGYY/Three Kingdoms Novel, complete with a completly different ending. The novel itself is based off of the end of the Han Dynasty/Rise of the Jin dynasty, the historical documents and folk tales around the era. In many cases, the novel either stretches the truth, or tells outright lies in the history, in forming the basis of the story (in many cases, a bastardization of the history which warps the real recored personalities of many people of the era). Hell, the novel thats well known today is actually a re-interpretation (read: bastardization) of a more historically accurate novel that was wrote a couple hundred years earlier.

    My point: My life was changed because of a bastardization of a bastardization of a bastardization of the history of the era. I know hundreds of people who, while maybe not having their lives changed, also came to learn a great deal about a period of Ancient China and open their horizons and eyes more than if the bastardization never occured. Lets say, theoretically, one more person learns about and sees and becomes enchanted with the original Old Boy (the manga, not the movie) because they saw the American remake with Will Smith, and it opens doors for them like a similar situation happened for me. Is an abstract view of a “legacy” or “integrity” really worth a shit in this case? The movie sucks, don’t see it, simple as that. Its not like the original movie will be lost forever or replaced, and it might just make more people interested in it (and since a re-release on an old foreign movie would go over real poorly in ticket sales, the “marketing” value of the original movie, no matter how good it may be, would be so little that I’d bet the impact of a re-release like that would be substantially dwarved by a Hollywood remake).

    Again, I’m not debating that Hollywood has racist tendencies and thinks very little of the American public. But really, considering all the potential positive values this could have on the original, it just seems off to hate Hollywood so much for daring to be a buisness instead of an art.

  33. bdsista wrote:

    Hell, I just glad the Brotha has a job and I hope that if there has to be a female that is not be the usual white chick, it would be REAL Good if a BW got some work in this genre and not as a victim.
    Ok, I honestly have no clue about this stuff. hate horror, will watch it if its so stupid, I laugh. Some psychological ones I like if theres no chopping or chainsaws or torture. I didn’t get the ring, and actually appreciated the parody more on Scary Movie (was it 2 or 3?) so I watch the Scary Movie flicks to catch up on whats in the horror genre. Maybe its me, but if I want to get scared, I will go into the hood where the drug dealers are or to a Klan initiation in LA. (Louisiana)

  34. Kmoney wrote:

    Is there anyone we can actively lobby to make this NOT happen? The movie is fine the way it is, we don’t need it remade into a corny/action/adventure/hero vehicle for Mr. Smith.

    spare us…

  35. Reiter wrote:

    Do no want. Oldboy’s themes are so inherently Asian it’ll make it very difficult if not impossible to translate successfully over to Western and Puritan sensibilities.

    I don’t usually mind Will Smith, though he’s not exactly my favorite actor. I dunno, his performances always smack of him trying too hard, as it were, where it’s all comes across as too forced and all. His machismo got annoying real quick in Independence Day, for example, and his drunken shenanigans in Hancock (why did I spend money to watch this in theaters, I’ll never know) were hokey as hell. I couldn’t buy into his Ali role (too skinny, I guess). His most nuanced performance was probably in I Am Legend (a movie I had problems with script-wise).

    He’s one of those actors where I never bought into him trying to act like a badass or the bad guy. Similar to Denzel Washington in Training Day, Man On Fire, and American Gangster (as much as I liked these movies), I just had a hard time imagining him as the villain, or his means being bad to justify his ends. He and Will Smith have cultivated their reputations and images as “safe blacks” (clean-cut, non-threatening, wholesome, etc.) to a mainstream white audience, imho, so that’s probably part of it.

    This alone will ruin an Oldboy remake for me. Will Smith just doesn’t have the gravitas or badassery to pull off the character given the really taboo subject matter. If it does get made, I won’t be watching unless it’s on cable (eventually).

    @ Ike – I couldn’t agree more with the Departed. First Hollywood steals the whole movie from Infernal Affairs (a far superior film, I thought), and the producers/writers have the gall to make fun of Asians with their hokey stereotypes? Gimme a break. Talk about being ingrates and biting the hand that feeds you. As if I didn’t already have enough reason to hate Boston and Bostonians (I’m from New York). What annoyed me the most was when the Oscars rolled around, they mistakenly announced the Departed as having been based on a Japanese movie when Infernal Affairs was a Chinese (Hong Kong) film. But that’s Hollywood for you. All Asians look alike.

    Charlize Theron as Lady Vengeance. Meh. An Akira remake, double meh. Why fuddle with the classics?

  36. Diana wrote:

    @Beth: I agree with you that Oldboy won’t translate well as an American film. When I watched it myself, I found it hard to buy into the motivations of the antagonist because from my own perspective I did not think Oldboy was really at fault or had done anything so bad to warrant the payback he got. But I can only chalk that up to my “Americaness.” If I was Korean, I most surely would have had a different reaction. And really that is the joy of watching “foreign” films–for their foreignness and experiencing something different for those two hours in the dark.

    But again, I am not totally against remakes. I see the current Grudge and Ring type fad as an experiment with a particular genre of horror films. As for Ugly Betty and The Office, and the like, I don’t think those shows would be successful if they did not construct the original concept around American culture. But that’s television. For film, I don’t think you always need that cultural shift–it’s only a 2 hour investment.

  37. Bagelsan wrote:

    “This is the original film. Learn how to read subtitles, you lazy shits!”

    Many online movie reviews for Pan’s Labyrinth were along the lines of “i didnt go to a movie to read mexican!!1!” …Just saying. :p And that’s one of the only popular/main-streamed non-English ones I can think of, off the top of my head, along with maybe Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.

  38. Chux wrote:

    I was always under the impression that Kurosawa created the original stories in japanese film that became movies such as “The magnificent seven” and “a fistfull of dollars”

  39. Persia wrote:

    Chux, Kurosawa created “Ronin” and “Seven Samurai,” but he said in interviews he wanted to create a “Japanese Western.” The success of the American remakes of those movies speaks to how successful he was! (Not to mention how many times those formulae have been rehashed.)

    What does make me angry is the lack of roles for Asian-American actors. Every time a movie from Asia gets remade, it’s not just adapted to American cultural norms… it’s de-Asianified. That’s a separate issue from the cultural borrowing.

    Yes, yes, YES.

    The Akira remake looks kind of fun, IMO. Maybe it’s because Akira never rang that coherent to me in the first place?

  40. jln wrote:

    “Everything becomes West-centric and revolves around something entirely different from the original context! That really bugs me.”

    To look at it another way though, making the movie revolve around something entirely different is what makes something worth remaking – otherwise the answer might as well be “people should just not be lazy and learn to read subtitles”. But when there’s a new spin, in addition to a new language/setting, that’s what makes a movie a *good* adaptation and not just a translated copy.

    It’s like with cover versions of songs – if someone does a note-for-note identical arrangement, then it’s true to the original but can’t be “good” at anything else – it’s when the rest is changed up that you can have covers that are equally good or surpass the original, right?

  41. John Jihoon Chang wrote:

    I don’t actually have very high hopes for the Spielberg/Smith remake of OLDBOY, unless it really veers off from the original and tries to tell a whole different story from the premise. Both director and actor (even in their darkest moments) are a little too clean for the plot.

    As for Hollywood’s (that’s my industry) penchant for remakes, adaptations and etc., like some have stated, it’s all for chasing the almighty dollar. After all, even Hollywood has to convince both investors and creditors that their project will make both them and someone else (the money men) rich. Using a work that has proven itself in another country, another medium or another era is a good way to convince the money men to provide the cash to make the movie, or even the deal to open a larger line of credit to the company to make more than one film.

    I used to blame the producers a lot myself until I started working in the business and I realize that the blame goes around: producers yes, but also audiences for not supporting more daring films, money men for being conservative when it comes to opening up the vault, creatives for their limited points of view, etc. No one gets off free.

    As for me, I’m pro-remake if the remake brings something to the table. I feel that stories are essentially common–at the core, most of all the movies we watch are all takes on the same basic story. It’s the context that matters and while I watch a ton of foreign film, that’s just my curiosity. I enjoyed the Departed (having lived in Boston) as much as I enjoyed Infernal Affairs. If it’s a good story, then changing the context to help tell the tale to a new audience is perfectly acceptable to me, so long as the original is properly credited.

  42. RChoudh wrote:

    Speaking of de Asianifying Asian remakes has anyone heard about the following? Hollywood is supposedly trying to recreate an adaptation of the Japanese video game classic Street Fighter. One of their supposed ideas was to have the Chinese character Chun Li embodied by the actress…Jessica Biel. I don’t know how they think they can pull that off.

    Another example of de Asianifying is that Hollywood is trying to make a movie out of the popular Japanese anime Dragon Ball. Almost all the characters are played by white actors. Now it could be said that since Dragon Ball is science fiction/fantasy this could be pulled off. But I always felt the anime had some very distinctive Asian elements to it so I don’t know how this movie could be pulled off either. So there’s my two examples of Hollywood trying to copy a winning Asian formula and not paying any homage to it.

  43. InJM wrote:

    @RChoudh
    Those aren’t quite the same as remaking films, especially with stories that are as weak as the two examples you brought up. There’s already been one Street Fighter remake and it was a huge fluke (even feature Raul Julia(sic probably) as M. Bison!).

  44. InJM wrote:

    Er, by remake I mean movie translation.

  45. DivergentDana wrote:

    Um, I’m at the beginning of the tooth extraction scene right now, and my exact thought was “there’s no way in hell that Will Smith could do this role.”

  46. Emmeaki wrote:

    First o all, Oldboy is one of my favorite movies ever! I only want to see the remake so I can see how they fuck it up. I want to know if they will keep the original theme or change it to make it more palatable for American audiences.

    It’s unfortunate that many Americans will see this Will Smith movie and have no idea that it’s a remake. Hopefully, those people will find out eventually and check out the original.

    It’s really frustrating that some Americans are so egocentric that they can’t relate to other (especially non-white) cultures. When I hear people complain about having to read subtitles, I want to smack them. They are the stupid, lazy, uncultured Americans that some foreigners perceive all of us to be.

    I wish Hollywood would put as much effort in making good movies as they did looking for foreign films/books/TV shows/old movies to remake.