Links – Post Election Day

I published a piece in for the American Prospect, detailing “Five Ways We Talked About Race and Identity This Election:”

Can we talk about race for a minute? I know — we’ve been talking about race since 2007, when Barack Obama formally entered the primary. The 2008 election has galvanized discussions of race (as well as class and gender) in America. Since Barack Obama’s “A More Perfect Union” speech challenged Americans to take the discussion of race relations into their homes and communities, all forms of media have found themselves searching for trends, meaning, and analysis all along racial lines.

So what were the major themes that emerged from this national conversation on race?

The headline on the NY Times site screams “Racial Barriers Fall as Voters Embrace Calls for Change.” (This title is flipped around a bit in the actual article.) There is also an article about the efforts of the civil rights movement coming to fruition:

For those like Miss Harris who withstood jailings and beatings and threats to their livelihoods, all because they wanted to vote, the short drive to the polls on Tuesday culminated a lifelong journey from a time that is at once unrecognizable and eerily familiar here in southwest Georgia. As they exited the voting booths, some in wheelchairs, others with canes, these foot soldiers of the civil rights movement could not suppress either their jubilation or their astonishment at having voted for an African-American for president of the United States.

The NY Times also reports the “Election Unleashes a Flood of Hope Around the World:

“The United States is choosing a black man as its president. Maybe we can share a bit in this happiness,” Mr. Cisneros said in Caracas. Conversely, some, like the Afghan president, Mr. Karzai, said the election had shown the American people overcoming distinctions “of race and color while electing their president” and thereby helping to bring “the same values to the rest of the world sooner or later.”

Jeff Chang blogs for Vibe about the new day dawning:

One of them was a 19-year old named Loric Frye. Frye was a Pennsylvanian, and because of that, he was a key voter in the presidential election. Senator John McCain had staked his strategy on winning the state, hoping to steal it from Senator Barack Obama in his comeback bid.

But Frye was far from the kind of clean-scrubbed, neatly partisan first-time voter Republicans would ever think to appeal to or CNN would ever bother to interview.

Frye was a young brother in oversized pants. His young son was at home and his girlfriend was pregnant with their daughter. He had no high-school diploma. He had no fancy title. Frye was, no, still is in the process of putting it all together.

If you went strictly by the stats, he wasn’t even supposed to have found his way into the voting booth yesterday. And truth be told, he almost didn’t.

He admits that up until this year, politics didn’t interest him. Barack got his attention. But the person who really turned him around was a man named Paradise Gray, a legendary hip-hop promoter and activist, who got Frye work as a community organizer doing voter outreach.

Frye spent the year canvassing, registering and door-knocking with Khari Mosley and the League of Young Voters. He started to feel deeply invested in the election and the political process. He spent the last few weeks doing get-out-the-vote work. All politics remains local. All transformations begin with the personal.

The Mojo blog asks “So who’s a real American now?”:

Put it all together and the message was clear: there are two types of Americans. Those who are true Americans–who love their nation and cherish freedom–and those who are not. The other Americans do not put their country first; they blame it first. The other Americans do not believe in opportunity; they want to take what you have and give it to someone else. The other Americans do not care about Joe the Plumber; they are out-of-touch elitists who look down on (and laugh at) hard-working, church-going folks. The other Americans do not get the idea of America. They are not patriots. And it just so happens that the other America is full of blacks, Latinos, gays, lesbians, and non-Christians.

Racewire sheds an important light on “The Party Not Everyone is Invited To“:

Most of today’s elections coverage has been focused on the inadequacies of the polling system to handle the actual number of eligible voters who turned out and the various glitches and flaws in mechanical and electronic voting systems. It’s likely that many voters across the spectrum today, especially in battleground states, got their first taste of what happens when a system supposed to empower you fails to do its job. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow likened these long lines to a new poll tax, where people who simply can’t afford to wait in line for 2, 5 or even 8 hours simply don’t vote.

These are important topics, but they only tell half a story. The other half is about the people who won’t be able to vote at all, regardless of how long the lines are.

Voting enfranchisement is such an old issue that it has lost some of its appeal on the Left and a lot of visibility in the mainstream. It’s hard to break into a mainstream consciousness that dictates “if I don’t break the law, I don’t need to worry,” especially when discussing felony voting re-enfranchisement. But the truth is that many people whose votes are suppressed haven’t broken any laws, but rather have tried to break in to a system that wasn’t designed to accommodate them.

Loving Thomas L. Friedman’s Op-Ed in the New York Times:

Since the last debate, John McCain and Barack Obama have unveiled broad ideas about how to restore the nation’s financial health. But they continue to suggest that this will be largely pain-free. McCain says giving everyone a tax cut will save the day; Obama tells us only the rich will have to pay to help us out of this hole. Neither is true.

We are all going to have to pay, because this meltdown comes in the context of what has been “perhaps the greatest wealth transfer since the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917,” says Michael Mandelbaum, author of “Democracy’s Good Name.” “It is not a wealth transfer from rich to poor that the Bush administration will be remembered for. It is a wealth transfer from the future to the present.”

Never has one generation spent so much of its children’s wealth in such a short period of time with so little to show for it as in the Bush years. Under George W. Bush, America has foisted onto future generations a huge financial burden to finance our current tax cuts, wars and now bailouts. Just paying off those debts will require significant sacrifices. But when you add the destruction of wealth that has taken place in the last two months in the markets, and the need for more bailouts, you understand why this is not going to be a painless recovery.

And finally, an article from the Washington Post called “America’s History Gives Way to Its Future“:

After a day of runaway lines that circled blocks, of ladies hobbling on canes and drummers rollicking on street corners, the enormous significance of Barack Obama’s election finally began to sink into the landscape. The magnitude of his win suggested that the country itself might be in a gravitational pull toward a rebirth that some were slow to recognize.

Tears flowed, not only for Obama’s historic achievement, but because many were happily discovering that perhaps they had underestimated possibility in America.

When the novelist Kim McLarin watched her vote being recorded at her polling station in Milton, Mass., she stood still for a moment with her 8-year-old son, Isaac. “My heart was full. I could scarcely breathe,” she said. “What I’ve been forced to acknowledge is there has been a shift — it’s not a sea change. But there’s been a decided shift in the meaning of race. It’s not an ending. It’s a beginning.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. ………….. at Crucial Minutiae - it’s the little things… on 05 Nov 2008 at 6:24 pm

    [...] that this victory does not mean that the work is done. As Atena said in a comment over at Racialicious: I hope that people can realize that feeling joy and elation over this event is not tantamount to [...]

Comments

  1. fathima wrote:

    honestly, i’m a little bemused by all this euphoria. i mean, i can appreciate that the symbolism and the imagery of this win is huge for americans, but on a practical (and international) level, i’m tired of the wholesale, unconditional joy. we haven’t reached a postracial utopia, not by a long shot. yes, americans have taken a step in that direction, but the long term effects of this win on antiracist activism remains to be seen. nothing can be taken for granted yet. (or ever, really.)

    i think Rage at down on the brown side puts it right when he notes:
    “It could be that today is the last day of an old era. Not just that of Bushs and Clintons in the White House, but also of the undercurrent of national discourse that recognizes that there has always been and still remains great inequality in this nation. I don’t know whether the whole post-race and post-affirmative action angle will come in quickly or later as the conservatives in both parties regroup and rethink their attack on the poor, the dark, and the newcomers, but it will come.

    The backlash towards whatever is left will definitely come. The brunt of anger and distrust will not fall upon the new leader, surrounded as he can be by the best that our money can train. The battleground, bloody or cold and calculated, will be in many states and towns across this nation. The targets will be simple, unchanged folks who hadn’t suddenly felt like they won a lottery just because someone who looks like them but has had all kinds of access through education and opportunity was just elected president.”

  2. j wrote:

    i’m disturbed by all the hoopla noting the end of an era, put most scarily in the Times’ headline of ‘racial barriers falling’. frankly, i see this election campaign and Obama’s victory as *the beginning* of a time when hopefully this country can finally begin to talk openly and honestly about race and how pervasive it continues to be *despite* the gains made by many people of color over the years. equally disturbing is the equation of the dawn of racial equality with Obama’s election. granted, Obama’s victory is certainly historic and notes some profound changes in the country over the years. but now the *real* works needs to be done – it ain’t over yet! it’s just beginning! with this man in the White House we need to see how far we can push things to ensure real equality for all people in this country.

  3. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    There are so many aspects to Obama’s victory that it’ll take years to understand them all. Even if it doesn’t change mainstream American attitudes toward minorities, it may change the world’s attitudes toward mainstream Americans. It may change minorities’ attitudes about how far they can go in America. It may signal the end of the 1960s culture wars…or a renewal of that era’s optimism and activism. It may mean we finally commit to tackling global warming and universal health care. Etc.

  4. pixilated wrote:

    i’ve honestly never witnessed a u.s. presidential election such as this in terms of how deeply people from all over the world were invested. even amongst people i know who have always been very politically aware and active the level of attention given was as high as if the president of their own country was about to be decided. one of my favourite things i’ve seen online so far are the photos on huffpost of celebrations all over the planet once obama’s presidency was announced. but it was very poignant to see three soldiers in an empty-looking cafeteria (? – someone correct me if i’m recollecting wrongly) in afghanistan – that was a really lonely looking snapshot.

  5. Atena wrote:

    I hope that people can realize that feeling joy and elation over this event is not tantamount to being naive and uninformed as to the state of politics, social relations, economic realities and the implications of living in a country that is dangerously out-of-balance. Some of us are ecstatically happy, even though we are well aware that this victory is not remotely a panacea to all of the nation’s ills.

    I am of the opinion that if I cannot open my heart for a while to the excitement of this occasion – if I cannot acknowledge the scope of this occasion, and how much it means to so many people (especially in a nation as damaged as the USA), then I’m not going to be very good at doing the things that will be necessary to effect change and hold this new president accountable. These good feelings are an investment, and I will call on them in the future when things are just hard and ugly again. In the meantime, I will nurture them, so that my heart is strong enough for the upcoming growing pains that we are bound to endure.

    If you’re not feeling it – that’s fine. But consider that some of us have every reason to feel this good, and try not to be a Buzz Killington about it. Thanks, and Peace! -a-

  6. Carmen Van Kerckhove wrote:

    So well said, Atena. Thank you.

  7. Atena wrote:

    Carmen – thank you for all that you’ve done to support the change we’re all hoping for. I read your blog about yesterday and I didn’t realize that you couldn’t vote – it never occurred to me! I can’t imagine the frustration of that. Thanks for engaging at such a high level to make this country a better place.

  8. Jennifer Gandin Le wrote:

    Atena — thank you for these words: “These good feelings are an investment, and I will call on them in the future when things are just hard and ugly again.” So good, and so accurate. I’m grateful that you pointed out the ways that joy does not equal naivete.

  9. gatamala wrote:

    The fact that CVK has been so engaged, yet can’t vote speaks volumes.

  10. Kendra wrote:

    @ Atena:

    I like how you expressed this feeling.

    It makes it somewhat easier for me to accept the excitement and joy of others, even though I’m not feeling this prevalent sense of euphoria.

    It’s just not coming. So, I’ll let myself be.

    I suppose I’m maintaining low expectations throughout since that’s easier for me. But I’m glad that many people can see the significance of this event given our history. I just hope no one forgets that history just b/c of Obama’s victory.

  11. Restructure! wrote:

    Speaking of Karzai, here’s a particularly atrocious quote by him:

    Afghan President Hamid Karzai said Obama’s victory took the world into a “new era.”

    “The election of Senator Barack Obama to the presidency of the United States has taken the American people and the rest of the world with them into a new era – an era where race, colour and ethnicity, I hope, will also disappear… in politics in the rest of the world,” he said.

    Yikes.

  12. Westerly wrote:

    @fathima and athena:
    I see where you’re both coming from.

    There are people around the world who are celebrating, or who are simply relieved. While Obama’s rather stylish victory is cause for celebration, don’t underestimate the fact that on an international level, the departure of Bush and his criminal minions from the White House is an equal, if not greater, cause for celebration.

    I don’t begrudge anyone their euphoria, their relief, their happiness, or their hope. Nor do I question the astuteness or wisdom of those who are able and willing to be open to the moment. But at the same time, I also understand those who are bemused by it all, or who feel that it is just another day – and not simply because they are attempting to rain on anyone’s parade, but because that is how they honestly feel.

    I oscillate between the 2 states. For myself, I’m happy enough, but in my heart-of-hearts I cautiously regard this victory as a respite.

    As for Obama?

    I listened to his speech. There were definite highs, and some lovely moments. But I’m also not an American.

    So as a non-American I heard the same old tired allusions to American exceptionalism and beacons-on-the-bloody-hill that can be heard in any of the speeches of the 43 preceding presidents. I heard the patriotism, the myopic nationalism, the customary, coded allusions to militarism, and recognised the obligatory nod to empire.

    I could be remembering this wrongly and if I am, apologies, but I also noticed that while he reeled off the rainbow ingredients of the melting pot, that there was nary a peep about Arabs or Muslims, who have been the unmentionable centre of a highly racialised election, steeped in religosity.

    I could have ruthlessly ignored those twinges of unease that I felt over words that were said, or were withheld. But they were there, and I don’t want to lie to myself about my own feelings or what I noticed.

    And it is odd to feel relief yet also hold (not-s0) quiet misgivings all at the same time. But that was how *I* felt on that night.

    Right now, I can tell myself that terms like “aggressive diplomacy” will place an accent on the latter rather than the former – but at this early stage? I just don’t know.

    And while Obama is far, far preferable to McCain, I also carry the sober realisation that he’s not a progressive (and nor does he claim to be), or even moderately leftist for that matter – he’s a centrist. Whether that will be an effective solution to the far-right extremes of the last eight years remains to be seen. I am curious as to how that will play out…

    The good news is that a highly educated black man can be president, with all that the position entails. The fact that it could even happen at all *is* progress, but at the same time I’m very much aware that he could be the Oprah Winfrey, the Williams sisters, the Lewis Hamilton or the Tiger Woods of his field.

    An exceptionally talented high achiever, who is pretty much out there on a limb, and a ‘once-in-a-generation’ type with few visible peers or immediate successors in sight… Although their presence could/should pave a path for future generations, I won’t take it for granted that it already has.

    I think Obama spoke the truth when he gave such high praise to his campaign. It has been masterful, and he is a consummate campaigner and politician. He’s brilliant and I now know that he can win primaries and be victorious in a General Election when the odds are against him. It’s been amazing, and at times extremely gratifying, to watch him in action. I can appreciate the feat he and his supporters have accomplished thus far.

    It remains to be seen however, what type of leader he is. So, I raised my glass last night…and now life continues…

  13. DivergentDana wrote:

    And is it just me, or was there a Little Red Hen* vibe after the win, where people who, hear them tell it, would have you believe that racism ended in the 50s/60s and prior to this would summarily dismiss concerns about the lack of minority representation in the highest levels of government and the private sector alike, proceeded to pat themselves on the back for America’s progressiveness and wax philosophical about its significance? How is this significant if the exclusively white male lineup before it wasn’t problematic for you at all, the apparent result of pure meritocracy, and/or harmless yet “politically incorrect” coincidence?

    *Here’s the Red Hen story, for those who don’t know it… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Little_Red_Hen

  14. Jessica wrote:

    In the 1950’s, African American culture was completely foreign to mainstream white America. It was the combination of forces, black and white, and Leonard Chess, record producer and artists like Muddy Waters, Etta James, and Chuck Berry to bring blues music into the mainstream. Fifty years later, and many developments later, we have made an important step, not just by voting for Obama but by voting for him in such great majority and with such fervor. If anything, this election was about the American people coming together to make a statement to each other and abroad that we want change, and we’re going to try to accomplish it