Good, and Now Back to Work: Avoiding Both Cynicism and Overconfidence in the Age of Obama

by guest contributor Tim Wise

Tonight, after Barack Obama was confirmed as the nation’s president-elect, I looked in on my children, as they lay sleeping. Though they are about as politically astute as kids can be, having reached only the ages of 7 and 5, there is no way they will be able to truly appreciate what has just happened in the land they call home. They do not possess the sense of history, or indeed, even a clear understanding of what history means, so as to adequately process what happened this evening, as they slumbered. Even as our oldest cast her first grade vote for Obama in school today, and even as our youngest has become somewhat notorious for pointing to pictures of Sarah Palin on magazines and saying, “There’s that crazy lady who hates polar bears,” they remain, still, naive as to the nation they have inherited. They do not really understand the tortured history of this place, especially as regards race. Oh they know more than most–to live as my children makes it hard not to–but still, the magnitude of this occasion will likely not catch up to them until Barack Obama is finishing at least his first, if not his second term as president.

But that’s OK. Because I know what it means, and will make sure to tell them.

And before detailing what I perceive that meaning to be (both its expansiveness and limitations) let me say this, to some of those on the left–some of my friends and longtime compatriots in the struggle for social justice–who yet insist that there is no difference between Obama and McCain, between Democrats and Republicans, between Biden and Palin: Screw you.

If you are incapable of mustering pride in this moment, and if you cannot appreciate how meaningful this day is for millions of black folks who stood in lines for up to seven hours to vote, then your cynicism has become such an encumbrance as to render you all but useless to the liberation movement. Indeed, those who cannot appreciate what has just transpired are so eaten up with nihilistic rage and hopelessness that I cannot but think that they are a waste of carbon, and actively thieving oxygen that could be put to better use by others.

This election does indeed matter. No, it is not the same as victory against the forces of injustice, and yes, Obama is a heavily compromised candidate, and yes, we will have to work hard to hold him accountable. But it matters nonetheless that he, and not the bloodthirsty bomber McCain, or the Christo-fascist, Palin, managed to emerge victorious.

Those who say it doesn’t matter weren’t with me on the south side of Chicago this past week, surrounded by a collection of amazing community organizers who go out and do the hard work every day of trying to help create a way out of no way for the marginalized. All of them know that an election is but a part of the solution, a tactic really, in a larger struggle of which they are a daily part; and none of them are so naive as to think that their jobs are now to become a cakewalk because of the election of Barack Obama. But all of them were looking forward to this moment. They haven’t the luxury of believing in the quixotic campaigns of Dennis Kucinich, or waiting around for the Green Party to get its act together and become something other than a pathetic caricature, symbolized by the utterly irrelevant and increasingly narcissistic presence of Ralph Nader on the electoral scene. And while Cynthia McKinney remains a pivotal figure in the struggle, the party to which she was tethered this year shows no more ability to sustain movement activity than it was eight years ago, and most everyone working in oppressed communities in this nation knows it.

It’s like this y’all: Jesse Jackson was weeping openly on national television. This is a man who was with Dr. King when he was murdered and he was bawling like a baby. So don’t tell me this doesn’t matter.

John Lewis–who had his head cracked open, has been arrested more times, and has probably spilled far more blood for the cause of justice than all the white, dreadlocked, self-proclaimed anarchists in this country combined–couldn’t be more thrilled at what has happened. If he can see it, then frankly, who the hell are we not to?

Those who say this election means nothing, who insist that Obama, because he cozied up to Wall Street, or big business, is just another kind of evil no different than any other, are in serious risk of political self-immolation, and it is a burning they will richly deserve. That the victorious presidential candidate is actually a capitalist (contrary to the fevered imaginations of the right) is no more newsworthy than the fact that rain falls down and grass grows skyward. It is to be properly placed in the “no shit Sherlock,” file. That anyone would think it possible for someone who didn’t raise hundreds of millions of dollars to win–at this time in our history at least–only suggests that some on the left would prefer to engage politics from a place of aspirational innocence, rather than in the real world, where battles are won or lost.

So let us be clear as to what tonight meant:

It was a defeat for the right-wing echo chamber and its rhetorical stormtroopers, foremost among them Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck.

It was a defeat for the crazed mobs ever-present at McCain/Palin rallies, what with their venomous libels against Obama, their hate-addled brains spewing forth one after another racist and religiously chauvinistic calumny upon his head and those of his supporters.

It was a defeat for the internet rumor-pimps who insisted to all they could reach with a functioning e-mail address that Obama was not really a citizen. Or perhaps he was, but he was a Muslim, or perhaps not a Muslim, but probably a black supremacist, or maybe not that either, but surely the anti-christ, and most definitely a baby-killer.

It was a defeat for those who believed McCain and Palin would be delivered the victory by the hand of almighty God, because their theological and eschatological vacuity so regularly gets in the way of their ability to think. As such, it was a setback for the religious fascists in the far-right Christian community whose belief that God is on their side has always made them especially dangerous. Now, having lost, perhaps at least some of these will be forced to ponder what went wrong. If we’re lucky, perhaps some will suffer the kind of crisis of faith that often prefaces a complete nervous breakdown. Either way, it’s nice just to ruin their Young-Earth-Creationist-I-Have-an-Angel-on-My-Shoulder day.

It was a defeat for the demagogues who tried in so many ways to push the buttons of white racism–the old-fashioned kind, or what I call Racism 1.0–by using thinly-veiled racialized language throughout the campaign. Appeals to Joe Six-Pack, “values voters,” blue-collar voters, or hockey moms, though never explicitly racialized, were transparent to all but the most obtuse, as were terms like “terrorist” when used to describe Obama. Likewise, the attempt to race-bait the economic crisis by blaming it on loans to poor folks of color through the Community Reinvestment Act, or community activists like the folks at ACORN, failed, and this matters. No, it doesn’t mean that white America has rejected racism. Indeed, I have been quite deliberate for months about pointing out the way that racism 1.0 may be traded in only to be replaced by racism 2.0 (which allows whites to still view most folks of color negatively but carve out exceptions for those few who make us feel comfortable and who we see as “different”). And yet, that tonight was a drubbing for that 1.0 version of racism still matters.

And tonight was a victory for a few things too.

It was a victory for youth, and their social and political sensibilities. It was the young, casting away the politics of their parents and even grandparents, and turning the corner to a new day, perhaps naively, and too optimistic about the road from here, but nonetheless in a way that has historically almost always been good for the country. Much as youth were inspired by a relatively moderate John F. Kennedy (who was, on balance, far less progressive than Obama in many ways), and much as they then formed the frontline troops for so much of the social justice activism of the following fifteen years, so too can such a thing be forseen now. That Kennedy may have been quite restrained in his social justice sensibilities did not matter: the young people whose energy he helped unleash took things in their own direction and outgrew him rather quickly in their progression to the left.

Tonight was also a victory for the possibility of greater cross-racial alliance building. Although Obama failed to win most white votes, and although it is no doubt true that many of the whites who did vote for him nonetheless hold to any number of negative and racist stereotypes about the larger black and brown communities of this nation, it it still the case that black, brown and white worked together in this effort as they have rarely done before. And many whites who worked for Obama, precisely because they got to see, and hear, and feel the racist vitriol still animating far too many of our nation’s people, will now be wiser for the experience when it comes to understanding how much more work remains to be done on the racial justice front. Let us build on that newfound knowledge, and that newfound energy, and create real white allyship with community-based leaders of color as we move forward in the years to come.

But now for the other side of things.

First and foremost, please know that none of these victories will amount to much unless we do that which needs to be done so as to turn a singular event about one man, into a true social movement (which, despite what some claim, it is not yet and has never been).

And so it is back to work. Oh yes, we can savor the moment for a while, for a few days, perhaps a week. But well before inauguration day we will need to be back on the job, in the community, in the streets, where democracy is made, demanding equity and justice in places where it hasn’t been seen in decades, if ever. Because for all the talk of hope and change, there is nothing–absolutely, positively nothing–about real change that is inevitable. And hope, absent real pressure and forward motion to actualize one’s dreams, is sterile and even dangerous. Hope, absent commitment is the enemy of change, capable of translating to a giving away of one’s agency, to a relinquishing of the need to do more than just show up every few years and push a button or pull a lever.

This means hooking up now with the grass roots organizations in the communities where we live, prioritizing their struggles, joining and serving with their constituents, following leaders grounded in the community who are accountable not to Barack Obama, but the people who helped elect him. Let Obama follow, while the people lead, in other words.

For we who are white it means going back into our white spaces and challenging our brothers and sisters, parents, neighbors, colleagues and friends–and ourselves–on the racial biases that still too often permeate their and our lives, and making sure they know that the success of one man of color does not equate to the eradication of systemic racial inequity.

So are we ready for the heavy lifting? This was, after all, merely the warmup exercise, somewhat akin to stretching before a really long run. Or perhaps it was the first lap, but either way, now the baton has been handed to you, to us. We must not, cannot, afford to drop it. There is too much at stake.

The worst thing that could happen now would be for us to go back to sleep; to allow the cool poise of Obama’s prose to lull us into slumber like the cool on the underside of the pillow. For in the light of day, when fully awake, it becomes impossible not to see the incompleteness of the task so far.

So let us begin.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. A Sick Kid on the Couch and a New President : Slate and Shell on 05 Nov 2008 at 1:29 pm

    [...] happened this morning. I am filled with hope that some change may come to this country, but as Tim Wise wrote on Racialicious this morning, there is still a lot of work to do, and as citizens, we are responsible for being the [...]

  2. “Good, and Now Back to Work: Avoiding Both Cynicism and Overconfidence in the Age of Obama” « Two Good Hands on 05 Nov 2008 at 5:45 pm

    [...] Must read — pdgoselin @ 5:45 pm Thanks to Tim Wise, white anti-racist activist, for one of the best post-election commentaries on what this election was and was not about, what it did and did not accomplish, and how we can [...]

  3. Tim Wise has some words. | Providence Daily Dose on 06 Nov 2008 at 3:28 pm

    [...] Good, and Now Back to Work: Avoiding Both Cynicism and Overconfidence in the Age of Obama. [...]

  4. The Multiracial Muse » Obama’s Victory Comes with Sobering Defeats, but We Can Still Celebrate on 06 Nov 2008 at 4:20 pm

    [...] win on Tuesday night. I wrote this comment below in an article on Racialicious entitled, “Good, and Now Back to Work”: As someone who occupies both sides of this argument, I agree with the basic concept of what Wise [...]

  5. Living history « We (heart) NYC on 07 Nov 2008 at 1:27 am

    [...] Also Obama-related, this is very good: Good, and Now Back to Work: Avoiding Both Cynicism and Overconfidence in the Age of Obama. [...]

  6. Rebel Without A Pause « Pregnant Drug-Dealing Prostitutes on 07 Nov 2008 at 2:48 am

    [...] Obama’s win does not mean that racist people didn’t vote for him or that racism has ceased to exist: some racist people did. And if you’re going to be naieve and tell me that EVERY SINGLE person who voted for him doesn’t, has never or will not continue to think, say or act discriminatately against Blacks or other people of colour, I, as a Black person, am going to tell you that I think you’re full of shit (and so will some White people). [...]

  7. More Post Election Links « Of Popcorn and Goobers on 07 Nov 2008 at 6:54 pm

    [...] from Racialicious, Time Wise’s roundup of what was and wasn’t accomplished on Tuesday, plus what’s left to be [...]

  8. Mindqila » Blog Archive » Formality!!! Flawless Victory on 26 Feb 2009 at 12:54 am

    [...] Wise on the task ahead: Good, and Now Back to Work And so it is back to work. Oh yes, we can savor the moment for a while, for a few days, perhaps a [...]

Comments

  1. Lisa J wrote:

    As always, wise words from Tim Wise! After we are done celebrating we all need to take a deep breath and be ready because Obama and all of us have our work cut out for us, it will be a bumpy road, and there are lots of haters out there. I do have a lot of faith in Obama and I think he will do his best with this mess we are in as a nation turn things aroung and will start to turn some people on the other side around, at least those who aren’t drinking from the cup of hatorade too deeply.

  2. atlasien wrote:

    Priority Number One: FIX VOTING and STOP the modern-day poll tax. Everyone needs to be registered to vote the day they’re born, or the day they become a U.S. Citizen. Election Day needs to be a national holiday. After being involved with the Obama voter registration campaign, I think this is where I am going to concentrate a fair amount of my efforts in the future.

  3. Rosa wrote:

    That’s the truth, Atlasien. And the time to do it is from right now, until it’s done.

    The really great thing the Obama campaign did is getting the organizers out, everywhere, all the time, from early on – I doorknocked for Kerry in 2004 and by the time we did it, it was too late – people who had heard they couldn’t vote because of convictions or unpaid parking fines or moving or getting married & changing their names, by the time we came around to tell them different it was too late for them to check with another source, so a lot of them didn’t vote anyway.

    Obama’s campaign had people out months ahead of time helping people clear those issues up, and the doorknocking yesterday was just a confirmation.

  4. Black Canseco wrote:

    tim wise is is fast. he owes me an interview too. lol.

    let us begin indeed.

    My biggest hope is the Obama doesn’t join the ranks of Oprah, Michael Jordan, Jay-Z and MLK, Jr in the deck of “proof that I’m not biased, and everything’s okay” cards.

  5. jen* wrote:

    Yep – I already got my first waves of cynicism last night. Don’t get me wrong – I breathed a huge sigh of relief before I inhaled another bated breath. But to hear all the commentary about how this election proves to the world that America has overcome racism…well…

    I just shake my head.

    Cuz we’ve only just begun to fight.

  6. Mayumi wrote:

    Word. On everything.

    Hope you don’t mind, I reposted in full on my blog with proper accreditation.

  7. Gail wrote:

    Obama’s campaign, and his life!, set a high bar for integrity, hope and commitment. I’m so inspired! What a wonderful day. Last night I felt overwhelmed with humility and gratitude. Today I feel like I can fly! Thank you Barak Obama and America!!

  8. Some Guy wrote:

    Every time I hear or read the pronouncement that Obama is the country’s first black or African-American president, I append (mostly in my head) the phrase, “… and the 44th white president.”

    Is it wrong to hope that he can help us move away from simplistic racial identifiers? Or am I just being dense?

  9. SarahSimone wrote:

    Just what I needed to read this morning. I’m hoping that we won’t feel complacent now. Instead, I hope we realize that we need to work extra hard, that our work for social justice and equality will be rewarded under Obama’s presidency, but we still have to be willing to do that work.

    I agree that this is a new racism, where we still hold prejudice and believe stereotypes, but are accepting of individuals once we get to know them. That isn’t an ideal place to be, and racism isn’t eradicated, but still, a generation of black children (and any children who don’t conform to the white standards) get to grow up with the proof right before their eyes, that they can achieve.

    I guess what I’m trying to say is that you’ve perfectly captured the combination of hope, excitement, and anxiety I’m feeling now.

  10. Penny wrote:

    “crazy lady who hates polar bears”

    LOL

  11. Vee wrote:

    I’m not a hater, nor a believer.
    I definitely recognize this to be a monumentous world wide event, but now its time to get to work. Let’s see what happens now, will his administration be able to pass his initiatives and campaign promises?

    Do I have faith in the people of America? Not really, because I couldn’t help but notice that there are still a large majority of people who believe in Sarah Palin, and have no problems with continuing the Invasion of Iraq, war, whatever. We need Texas, Idaho, Arkansas, etc.

    Tim Wise piece is dead on. I’m sure Obama will KO his State of the Union address speech but now that the political campaign shows and conventions are over, it is time to get to work and make it happen. Can Obama make it happen and unify Congress and get them to work lik FDR did? And more importantly can Americans (more importantly the organizers) truly get together to fix the problems left by the Bush administration.

    Time will tell. I’m sure Obama is up to the task, but the celebration will be over very soon. I know I’m inspired to get involved with local organizations and volunteer my time.

  12. jeffliveshere wrote:

    “And before detailing what I perceive that meaning to be (both its expansiveness and limitations) let me say this, to some of those on the left–some of my friends and longtime compatriots in the struggle for social justice–who yet insist that there is no difference between Obama and McCain, between Democrats and Republicans, between Biden and Palin: Screw you.”

    Wow. First off, I’d ask some questions of somebody who says that there is no difference between Obama and McCain–rather than saying screw you. You seem to be setting up a straw-person; anybody who says there is “no difference” between McCain and Obama, between Dems and Repubs, generally means that there isn’t enough of a difference for them–that Obama and McCain are more similar than most people would like to think–I’d like to have a link to some people who more literally think there is no difference, please, because I haven’t met ‘em.

    Obama will be a better president than McCain for progressive and liberation causes. Being happy that Obama, rather than McCain, was elected doesn’t have to mean that we think Obama is different enough from McCain for what we want to get done in the world. And just because some of us don’t want to jump on the happy parade bandwagon, just because some of us can celebrate that we have an african-american president while at the same time lamenting that we have a president that is pro-war, pro-late-term-abortion-ban, pro-patriot act, anti-gay marriage (though he says he’s “open” to having his mind changed), pro-coal, pro-war-on-drugs, pro-death penalty. That Obama is similarly-minded to McCain on many of these issues matters to me enough to bring up the idea that those who look at presidential (and other) politics as a dichotomy (Dems vs. Repubs) are missing important pieces of the big picture.

    (Oh, and I don’t appreciate the sex-negative “screw you” as a feminist man who tries to avoid using sex as a weapon.)

  13. cinco wrote:

    I can’t add much to what’s been said. What a well written commentary.

    We’re making progress, but we can’t give up. There’s too much still to do.

  14. jeffliveshere wrote:

    Oh, and: Part of Obama’s “getting back to work” apparently means considering appointing sexist asshat Larry Summers as Treasury secretary (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/18/AR2008101802113.html). Sheesh.

  15. Jennifer Gandin Le wrote:

    This is such an eloquent acknowledgment of the significance of this moment for so many people, while also holding the space for the work that we will all continue doing.

  16. Vee wrote:

    ^Jeffliveshere, good comments.
    I’ll add that there is a strong chance that we might have a conflict/invasion/war in Afghanistan in order to “capture” Osama bin Laden, or stop Al Qaeda.
    And Obama plans to continue G. W. Bush’s faith based initiatives in some manner.

    Time will tell.

  17. oterhog wrote:

    I just heard that Ralph Nader dropped the “uncle Tom” bomb:

    http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212183850.shtml

  18. Jess wrote:

    TimWise is right, you can’t get hung up on ideological purity.

    There is no such thing as a nonsexist, nonracist person in this country, and I can’t think of a way to even imagine what that would be like. But frankly, I don’t get hung up on a person’s individual beliefs too often.

    The key is to make it so that the system doesn’t aid and abet racist and sexist behavior. You have to structure things so that your personal animus no longer matters.

    That’s where the struggle comes in. Once that’s done, then you can talk about feelings. I don’t care if the guy who voted for Obama is a racist at heart. He voted for Obama. Eisenhower didn’t believe black folks were equal, nor did Kennedy. But they enforced the laws that said they were. Johnson was a Southernor too, and I believe he signed a little thing called the Civil Rights Act. He chose to do the right thing.

    That’s what matters. Do you choose to do the right thing. Everything else? Well, I can’t read minds, so forgive me if I don’t care much that you use a certain expression or don’t deconstruct every utterance or go on about gender studies and sexist ads. None of that ever got a person the right to vote or got the local health center up and running.

    I care what you do, in the real world.

    Right on Tim Wise.

  19. Atena wrote:

    One of the things I like about Obama’s campaign is that he talks about people participating in- and being responsible for government.

    My hope is that people will see this as an opportunity to make a habit of letting leaders know what we think of the decisions they make, and to hold them accountable for representing all of us.

    It’s not Obama’s job to fix everything or only make decisions that everyone thinks are great. The way I see it, it’s his job to do his best to do as little harm and as much good as possible for the whole of this nation.

    I’d be very impressed if Obama could compile a full cabinet that included no sexist asshats. I’m not saying it is or isn’t possible, but it’s an interesting challenge.

  20. BenjaminD wrote:

    Dearest Dumbass,

    Nader didn’t run Green Party, nor does he have any affiliation.

    And when it comes to the task of holding populist candidates to their campaign promises there has been absolutely no more effective group in American history than 3rd party progressives.

    We congratulate Obama on his historic win, and share the optimism that he will uphold the themes that he invoked during his campaign even if his record of voting for the Patriot Act and funding the war made it impossible for some of us personally to vote for him with a clear conscience.

    We are proud of our country for demonstrating to the world that we are capable of looking beyond racial prejudice and fearmongering.

    We look forward to working with Democrats to fix this deeply broken country, even if we are slightly bemused by your newfound sense of elitism.

  21. ChocoLatta Mama wrote:

    THANK YOU Tim Wise!

    2 claps, 3 snaps and a combination hairflip and eyeroll

  22. superchunk12 wrote:

    I would offer to Jess the suggestion that sexist language and the flippant attitude toward sexism is a big part of the reason that the ERA hasn’t been ratified and that Abortion rights are CONSTANTLY being threatened. In the real world.

  23. bama08 wrote:

    jeffliveshere:
    What exactly is the progessive and liberation agenda for which ‘much work must be done’?

    We’ve heard enough eloquence (even though we agree with it). We need specifics!

  24. Sara wrote:

    Last night, as some of my friends were celebrating, a few others were shaking their heads and saying “this won’t really change anything.” I couldn’t help confronting them with a big “Woah!” and asking them to consider the historical breakthrough this is for us. Thank you for writing this piece – I’ll be posting it on my wall at my school for all of my friends, celebratory or cynical, to see.

  25. superchunk12 wrote:

    Additionally, the ideas challenging the status quo are the stuff political movements are made of. When women insisted that they were every bit as human and capable of thought at men, they got the right to vote. Other factors, but that was definetly one of them.

  26. livininphilly wrote:

    I agree with Tim Wise and this is a great peice. The work really will be hard and i’m up for the challenge. Last nite I saw a changing of the guard. Did anyone notice who was in the Obama crowd vs the McCain crowd. obama’s supporters looked like a real representation of the US and McCains looked like what used to be the representation of the country.
    For an example of how far we actually have to go note that California seems to be passing Prop 8. For those of you that don’t know Prop 8 is a proposition to write into california’s constituion that marriage is between only a man and a woman. It’s discriminatory to gay/lesbian/queer communities and if passed (looks that way) will deny same sex couples their right to marry whomever they want.
    Let’s make sure that during this changing of the guard communities don’t get stuck outside. A lot of work is ahead not just for race ralations but also sexuality, gender and class isues b/c they should all be on the table now.

  27. gatamala wrote:

    … and frankly Tim, I see little difference in cynicism and contempt between the people you described and the ilk that was soundly rebuked for appealing to the lowest common denominator. How ironic (yep) that those who think they are working for someone’s “liberation” are actually shitting on others’ experiences. How condescending and arrogant.

    One of the things I like about Obama’s campaign is that he talks about people participating in- and being responsible for government.

    YES Atena. Vee, Jeff: read his speech. It’s not about him. It’s about you.

    Vee I agree with you on FBCI. But what are you going to do? As a WaRshingtonienne and Fed I know that $$$ makes all the difference. You need to volunteer and donate to Godless America and Americans for the Separation of Church and State.

    Also, we do have 2 overt wars going on. Jess is right regarding eschewing ideological purity (remember, that’s what the “others” do). Ideals and principles are paramount, but without pragmatism you have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

    This is why Barack is building his team and not engaging in schadenfreude (our job in part ;) ) and ideological grandstanding.

    Jeff, my first thought about Summers was “that Harvard guy”. However, I have confidence that Barack has seriously weighed his potential. I don’t like what he said, but certainly you understand that we have bigger concerns. my concern is what the continuing economic decline will do to women around the world. I am also confident that Summers can cull the best and brightest from all walks of life. If he doesn’t, the ax.

  28. livininphilly wrote:

    just to add Nebraska also now bans affirmative action…

  29. The Cruel Secretary wrote:

    @ ChocoLatta Mama–

    2 claps, 3 snaps and a combination hairflip and eyeroll

    OMG! LMAO!

    I. Must. Bite. This. With your permisssion…

  30. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    I would’ve thought the highest priority was some combination of fixing the economy, drawing down the war in Iraq, and taking a stand on global warming. Perhaps with some quick hits such as ending our torture policy, closing Guantanamo Bay, and revoking extralegal executive orders.

    But FIX VOTING? Okay, let’s do that too.

    Sheesh, this is going to take a long time. Maybe a whole eight years.

    But if we get back to where we were in 2000, before Bush ravaged the country, I’ll be happy. As Tim Wise said, this is a long-term problem.

    In short, it’s not about what one president can do. It’s about starting (or restarting) a movement that will last for decades.

  31. Peter G wrote:

    Great commentary. Everybody’s already said it. Thanks, Tim.

  32. Lisa J wrote:

    @ BenjaminD. I am not sure who you are calling a dumbass, but if you are referring to Tim Wise, you are sadly mistaken. That epithet is not even remotely accurate . Also, Tim did not say that Ralph Nader runs the Green Party, he said that Nader increasingly symbolizes some of the problems of the party and goes on to mention the role of Cynthia McKinney (the acutal Green candidate) in the party. Nader was the Green candidate in 2000 and has been their most popular nominee to date in terms of the votes he received, so it would make sense that people associate him with the Green Party. And Tim has a point, Nader has not done much visible heavy lifting with the Greens to build that party up in national stature or to build up third parties in general once the 2000 and 2004 elections were over . He has also seemed rather smug and full of himself and it leaves one to wonder why he keeps running for President but lately has not done much beyong that (at least that is transparant) to change the country for the better. In the past, yes, lately no. I’ve heard that critique of him before and it rings true for me and I voted for him in 2000. Essentially part of the message here to leftists is to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. A problem fellow travelers have had for quite some time.

  33. Juki Schor wrote:

    Hei. I am writing from abroad and wonder if somebody would be willing to answer a question.
    I read this: “Now, having lost, perhaps at least some of these will be forced to ponder what went wrong.”
    Are you sure that it went wrong for them? I have for some time had the feeling that the Republicans were actually quite happy that they wouldn’t have to take responsibility for cleaning up their mess, that is a pattern which has been going on for decades, I feel. When it comes to consolidating a country and “regaining” the trust and hope of the people in a rotten economic system, the democrats are pushed (or allowed to win). Once the situation calms down with a few good will reforms, the Republicans are back to “harvest the fruits” again. Another 4 years of Republican “deregulated” politics would have turned your country upside down and really made a mess that would have also affected the “financial elites”. They have now “raped the cow” just enough that the democrats can get her back up again, with all your enthusiastic hope and “hard work”, but it won’t change a bit in the basic system, unless they stop the bail out in the next few weeks. Or am I too cynical?

  34. em wrote:

    EXCELLENT! i’ve had an ongoing listserv debate on the topic of just how “changed” the american racial landscape will be after obama’s win. while i think it’s a definite cause for celebration, it is SO time to get back to work. GREAT!

  35. Kaonashi wrote:

    I feel like the Universe has granted us one hell of a “Do-Over” card. What we do with it is up to all of us.

  36. Lev Lafayette wrote:

    The title and content of your message expresses a sound and considered opinion. Yes, this mattered and it mattered a great deal – having a leader who is sympathetic is but an opportunity, not a conclusion.

  37. diginovember wrote:

    gatamals says:

    “Jeff, my first thought about Summers was “that Harvard guy”. However, I have confidence that Barack has seriously weighed his potential. I don’t like what he said, but certainly you understand that we have bigger concerns. ”

    Who’s to say Obama even knows of Summers past. He was busy listening to Reverand Writes stirring sermans. Obviously the Clinton administration understood Summers. It has been reported that when Brooksley Born, Chairperson, Commodity Futures Trading Commission in 1997 needed slapped down, after sugesting regulation for deritatives, Under Treasury Secretary Summers was up to the job.

  38. Slim Jackson wrote:

    I kinda think that once the celebration wears off, tension will mount again. At least for a little while. Though there are millions celebrating, there are millions that are upset, angry, racist, etc. There’s also a number of people out there who are capable of walking out into the streets and doing something crazy to appease their anger. I’ll be keeping a watchful eye for a while. Not trying to get hit in the head with a bottle.

  39. Black Canseco wrote:

    “I feel like the Universe has granted us one hell of a “Do-Over” card. What we do with it is up to all of us.”

    And therein lies the rub.

    Obama’s election isn’t reparations. It’s not payback. And it’s not a license to pretend that the past never happened or is so far out of view that it’s irrelevant nor should it be an excuse to pretend that the future is so close that the present isn’t worth acknowledging.

    I’m a black male, from chicago, african heritage, muslim name. I’m educated. no prison record… the crap i’ve seen in my life related to racial inequities i wouldn’t wish on anyone. only my parents saw worse and only their parents saw worse than them.

    I don’t want to see Barack Obama reduced to another trophy in the America’s so-cool case right next to Motown, Jay-Z, Oprah, Bill Cosby, Michael Jordan, MLK, Jr. and Chris Rock. And i fear, that’s where this is already headed.

    Barack Obama ran a post racial race aka (my race/people are only as relevant as our ability to transcend and “get over it”). Obama ran a race with almost no mention of: the prison industry complex, racial inequities in education, hypocritical foreign policy that pledges undying allegiance to Israel and European nations while condescending to if not outright-ignoring nations of color (Jamaica, Haiti, sub-sarahan Africa) almost across the board. (Granted Darfur got a random mention, but little more.)

    Obama ran a campaign where the sum total of his inner-city agenda consisted of coming to my church in Chicago on Mothers’ Day last year and telling black men to raise their kids and turn the TV off.

    i could go on, but lets not get ahead of ourselves.

  40. bigghigg wrote:

    i find it best, in my case at least, two recognize obama’s election as two distinct events. first, the election of a black man is something truly historic and of great symbolic importance. second, the election of a moderate democrat to the position of spokesperson for american imperialism is just that. barack obama is not the revolution, he is just another capitalist politician.

  41. Erynn wrote:

    Thank you for this insightful and balanced post. I’m not in love with Barack Obama, but I am greatly encouraged for the progress he represents to so many people in this country. There is so much yet to do — it’s time to get out there and do it.

  42. Q wrote:

    …”none of them are so naive as to think that their jobs are now to become a cakewalk because of the election of Barack Obama.”

    While I enjoyed Wise’s piece, as I enjoy most of his work, I think it is important that when doing anti-racist writing, not to use racist terms such as cakewalk. It is an unfortunate term and really unfortunate that he used it here for Barack’s election win as blacks during slavery had to compete in games for cake (blacks later named a dance after it) and then the cakewalk was used by whites as part of minstrel activity, such as the University of Maryland’s annual cakewalk that used to be done in blackface. Language is important.

  43. Black Canseco wrote:

    Q,

    language is important but i doubt Wise knew the origins of “cakewalk”. and even if he did the word’s origin works to reinforce his points about how far we have to go and the need of blacks to compete just to have an opportunity to eat that everyone else takes/took for granted.

    Now if he’d said something about “being as american a picnics and apple pie” i think we might have a more salient issue.

  44. Jayme wrote:

    This is truly eloquence and insightfulness at its best. I have felt much of this in the past 24 hours but have not been able to put it so clearly. It truly is a victory in some senses and a reminder of the continuation of the struggles in many more ways. I am tempted to take Obama for his word. To believe him. And his popularity and poise may convince people that things are getting better without their effort and that they just need to sit back and reelect him in 4 years. I’m not actually that cynical.

    I am so very happy that i turned 18 only 4 days ago and i got to vote!

    but really, this piece is truly moving.

    thank you.

    in solidarity,
    jayme

  45. Kaonashi wrote:

    Obama’s election isn’t reparations. It’s not payback. And it’s not a license to pretend that the past never happened or is so far out of view that it’s irrelevant nor should it be an excuse to pretend that the future is so close that the present isn’t worth acknowledging.

    Wow.

    I don’t know how you got all of that from what I said, but I’m really sorry you translated it that way.

  46. VEe! wrote:

    gatamala,
    I commented, “And more importantly can Americans (more importantly the organizers) truly get together to fix the problems left by the Bush administration.”

    I basically agree with Wise premise, but as far as faith goes . . . I don’t know. I’m inspired, but I’ll answer to the question “what now?” by the actions that follow.

  47. VEe! wrote:

    correction:
    I’ll judge the answer (the outcome) to the question “what now” by the actions that follow. What the incumbent President does and what American as a whole does.

  48. Izumi wrote:

    Is it significant that the division of the red and blue states east of the Mississippi looked identical to a map of the Civil War states?

  49. waxghost wrote:

    I’m not Tim Wise but I wrote about this this morning myself: http://thewhatifgirl.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/race-still-matters/

    Though I feel like Black Canseco already said it better than I could.

  50. Black Canseco wrote:

    Kaonashi,

    my reaction wasn’t about you as much as it was about the overall excitement. it’s historic, no doubt; but i think folks will blow it out of proportion in the name of numbing the masses from the work that still needs to be done.

  51. Runaway Slave wrote:

    I’m black and I voted for Nader. I knew he wasn’t going to win, but I didn’t care. He has helped passed more laws any other politician as a consumer advocate. Nader has worked over 40 years to keep American citizens from being exploited by big business. People need to know there are more options than the Democrats and Republicans who should become one and call themselves the Business Party. All the problems in this country can be traced to either of the Dems or Repubs. There is a very small minority of politicans in either party (Democrat Dennis Kucinich & Republican Ron Paul) who are for true change. Barack Obama is not for true change. He is just another political puppet. But yet he has black folk thinking he is Marcus Garvey, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and Huey Newton rolled into one. Obama is really the black version of Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, and Richard Nixon. Bought and owned presidents. You’ll find out in years to come. The position of the President is one of the most corrupt seats a politician can hold.

    Obama has done nothing except brought black people closer to the Democratic Party. He is not a revolutionary, like some black folk think.

    Chairman Omali Yeshitela of the African People’s Socialist Party warned black folk about this. As well as Malcolm X, Huey Newton, Fred Hampton, W.E.B. Du Bois, Elijah Muhammed, and many other of our leaders warned us about becoming loyal to either the Democrats or Republicans.

    I could care less if the POTUS is black, Latino, white, Asian, Middle Eastern, Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Hare Krishna, Atheist/Agnostic, male or female, straight, gay, bisexual as long as he or she is not a corporate puppet.

    I am not thrilled about the next four years. Maybe after the Democrats get their turn to ruin the country, people will realize there are more options then the Republicrats/Demopublicans.

  52. Tariq Nelson wrote:

    No doubt there is much work to do and we must remain vigilant and engaged. But let’s try to remain positive. Each of us must do our part to make a more successful America

  53. guide boy wrote:

    I’m all for mocking dreadlocked anarchist whitey, but shouldn’t you also mock whitey journalist who opens an article about the virtuous struggles of “folks of color” in a fit of masturbatory self-regard by describing his tow-headed but righteous children sleeping blissfully unaware of the enormity of our racialiciousist stain?

  54. blackbeauty46 wrote:

    This a Great Day for America as History was made!!! God Bless Obama and his family, and let’s do keep them uplifted in the Lord! We definitely must come together as “”ONE NATION” all people, all races, all colors. We are one!

  55. atlasien wrote:

    “Is it significant that the division of the red and blue states east of the Mississippi looked identical to a map of the Civil War states?”

    It doesn’t. Obama won Virginia, is winning North Carolina and once all the votes are counted will be fairly close in Georgia.

  56. eliza wrote:

    Thank you for this article. It puts into words much of what I’ve been feeling while reading many of the reactions to this election around the liberal/left/progressive internet sphere.

    Sometimes I do think that progressives whether within anti-racism work or other liberal issues suffer to much from what I call the ‘yes but….’ syndrome and in doing so ‘wring whatever might be positive out of something with all sorts of disclaimers, cynicism and ‘yes, but he’s…. ‘ “yes but this…’ “yes but that…’, ‘yes but, yes but… to the point where it gets left on the floor with all of the other dirt.

    There is nothing wrong with being critical or even somewhat cynical but a focus on just those aspects can lead to missing out on the positives, which are the things that must be built upon. The ’seeds’ or ’steps’ so to speak.

    I’ve been a social activist for quite some time and the reality is that no success or victory is perfect or pure. The world is very gray.

    I can’t tell you how many times I’ve sat with people who at the time of some success of say getting a progressive policy passed through a local council which for the most part meets what we were striving for and instead of celebrating the gain the focus is on the part that doesn’t meet our standard. Instead of smiles its depression and a whole lot of ‘yes butting…’

    Drives me nuts sometimes. Positive people! No movement local or otherwise is built on lolling around in only the negative and the yes buts.

    Celebrate the positive, as small as it might be in ones own opinion. Then move on from there. Build on the ‘informed’ recognition of it and the positive energy that it gives off.
    This is where the driving factors of true change come from.

  57. Irene wrote:

    Tim, thank you for this post; you have beautifully expressed many of the things I have been thinking.

    During this campaign cycle, I often felt very cynical about a list of things too long to enumerate. But Tuesday and Wednesday I felt more energized and hopeful than I have in a long while. And the optimism was so strong, it transcended politics – I felt more hopeful about everything in my life than I have in a while. It saddens me to think there are people who are so dead inside – and so unsophisticated – that they cannot feel a joy and sense of accomplishment right now.

    But I also woke up on Wednesday to the news of which propositions failed and which passed, and saw clearly how much more work there is to be done. The difference, for me at least, is that for the first time since I have been politically active, a presidential election has made me feel rejuvinated in that work and not further demoralized and overwhelmed.

    I hope other people see what you have pointed out, that this is the time to celebrate and savor some joy, then regroup and get back to it.

  58. tristan shaw wrote:

    “those who cannot appreciate what has just transpired are so eaten up with nihilistic rage and hopelessness that I cannot but think that they are a waste of carbon, and actively thieving oxygen that could be put to better use by others.”

    or perhaps they feel like a parent, looking in on slumbering children such as yourself, children who in their waking moments are so bedazzled by the party politics at the heart of Empire that they do not seem to comprehend the struggles of billions of people around the world. the ‘liberation movement’ as you term it, extends a hell of a lot further than the borders of the stolen land of North America.
    nice tantrum.

  59. j.k. wrote:

    @ guide boy:

    YES. thank you. finally someone said it.

    tim wise is cool and all, but he also profits off of racism. yes, you can argue (and i agree with this point) that he’s a good place for white people to work out their guilt/privilege/tears, but the problem is that for a lot of white people, it stops there.

    as a woman of color, i say a lot of the same things that tim wise says, but am regarded as a “crazy” and/or “angry” person of color.

    tim wise profits off of racism.

  60. Ka_Jun wrote:

    jeffliveshere-agreement. Some of us who have concerns about an imperial US foreign policy and the possible continuation of the aforementioned policy (i.e. unilateral bombing of Pakistan and Syria) still reserve the right to dissent. An Obama administration, if one is to take his public statements at face value, may continue these policies. If so, then many of us who marched on DC in ‘02 and ‘03 against W/Cheney’s Iraq adventurism will march again. I don’t have a problem holding our elected leaders accountable for their policies.

  61. Bianca wrote:

    Black Canseco,

    Wow. Your words truly resonated with me. Thank you. They brought my attention back to a perspective I set aside yesterday as I rejoiced. I really just wanted to let it all sink in, spend the day smiling and being elated.

    Thought, I don’t think Obama ran a post-racial campaign, I don’t think he’s ever asked Black people to “get over” anything, I do feel he neglected a community he spent much time with earlier in his career. My feeling is he was playing to win. I had to tell myself that early on or be at the mercy of the cynicism and resentment I hold toward every single politician.
    People will turn him into a trophy and many will lose sight of the tasks at hand, and many will not see that the battles we face haven’t been discussed. Those who know not to, won’t and that’s what is more important.

    Many, many people do realize an immense amount of work needs to be done and that a great deal of it will continue long after his presidency. There was enough of a foundation laid in the last couple of years to for grassroots movements to become more involved. The issues you mentioned can be added to his agenda while he is in office. Perhaps some already are.

    I’m thinking the sentiment of getting a “do-over” is just a feeling that maybe the next for years will be a more inclusive experience. I don’t think anyone’s being asked to forget the past. I think people remembering the past has a lot to do with his win.

    If I’m being too optimistic, well, I can’t lie. I’ve experienced a major change of heart.

  62. Bianca wrote:

    oops. I meant “Though” not “Thought”. Sorry.

  63. Talen wrote:

    It was indeed a defining moment in American history, but you lost me as soon as you got to Jesse Jackson weeping. The same man who called Obama an f’ing half breed ni**** who should have his balls cut off.

    Everyone seems to be lost in the moment and forgeting one important fact…he’s a politician and he will do as politicians do and have always done.

  64. Multiracial Muse wrote:

    As someone who occupies both sides of this argument, I agree with the basic concept of what Wise says but strongly disapprove of the attitude he uses in saying it. There’s no place for condescending and arrogant put-downs in a community of progressives, ESPECIALLY from a white cisgendered able-bodied man.

    Tim Wise has educated a lot of people, and I admire him and quote him often because of his efforts, but I’m betting he wasn’t in San Francisco or Omaha on Tuesday night, where the consequences of pushing centrism have eliminated decades of progressive effeorts and enshrined racism, bigotry and homophobia into the state constitutions.

    As a leftist progressive and the daughter or a first-generation dual American-Kittitian citizen, I am beyond elated at what happened on Tuesday. It was the culmination of decades of ambition, careful planning, and grassroots organization intermeshed with a cultural convergence and a shift in awareness among a new generation sick of the crap our progenitors handd down to us and allowed us to inherit. I was crying. I was weeping in joy and disbelief. It meant so much to me to know that I might soon have national health care and not worry about moving from state to state, that people lived up to their promise to vote the way they said they would, that negative campaigning is no longer a successful strategy when we expose it, that I can tell my future children that they can be anyone or anything they want to be, that I can tell my future grandchildren that I was there when the world changed.

    However, I woke up the next day much more sober and aware of the immense challenges and expectations Obama faces. He had to be perfect and he had to be a centrist in order to win. He had to be better than not only every black American running before him but better than every other white American running against him. I wish it didn’t have to be that way. I suspect that one of the consequences of a globally connected society is that the trend of watching every step you take will only grow more difficult. Guns and bitterness, anyone?

    You can celebrate an historic moment and lose yourself in it for one night, even one week or one month, and still not lose sight of the ethical compromises you have made to ensure any victory rather than no victory at all.

    I barely had time to decide what was more important: my health care (and with it, my career opportunities, my parent’s financial stability, and my education) or my desire for integrity in a campaign. When I worked on his campaign for three months and gave up my sanity and most aspects of a non-political life to ensure that Allegheny County and Pittsburgh, Pensylvania kept our state blue, I went through a lot of ugly crap and saw others endure much, much worse in order to see Obama win. My initial motivations for helping him were anti-conservative sentiment, intense disgust withthe racist idiocy surrounding me, and theknowledge that he held the promise of securing our Supreme Court from decades of evil legislation and providing America with health care and a (more) progressive environmental stance, to say nothing of w way out of Iraq and an end to deregulation and corporate greed. As I spent more time listening to what he was saying, it became clearer that while we desperately need a dramatic reversal from the last eight years, we are more likely to see a fundamental and permanent shift to the left if we have someone to talk the conservatives down and reign in their ire and indignation.

    I don’t want to have to fight the fight of my lifetime every four years just to protect a reversal of Republican policies. I don’t think we can keep any of the changes we make for the better unless we educate the middle Americans and stop calling them stupid in public, even when they are stupid and bigoted and flat-out wrong. Me clinging to my moral ideals won’t help the poor and the disenfranchised nationally. Some leftists seem to forget that local action only goes so far and can be overturned easily. The American people are too afraid to revolt; if they were going to overthrow the political system, they would have done so already. I choose to change our laws and opinions from the inside out, because frankly, I can’t wait thirty years for a dramatic shift. I need change now.

    Obama was not my first choice. He wasn’t even my second choice. He is my final choice. I don’t feel like I voted against Bush this time. I voted for Obama.

  65. bea wrote:

    Nov. 4th, 11 p.m. mountain time

    My feelings: wonder, happiness, relief, hope, and

    sympathy for Obama.

    The problems he faces in this country are HUGE and run DEEP. He is not going to be able to fix everything, for everyone, all at once.

    I feel like many of the expectations people are placing on this one guy are really unrealistic. Give him a break! He’s the president, not God!

    There is trouble ahead for us as a country and as a global community.

    WE have a lot of work to do, with the anti-racist movement, cleaning-up the environment, and in general changing all of the dysfunctional aspects of our culture that have put us where we are today.

    I am thankful that We now have a president who will work WITH us (not for us!) .

  66. gatamala wrote:

    Ka-jun: exactly accountability

    Juki Schor: food for thought

    eliza: I thought I was jaded, but damn…

    Thanks BC

  67. jeffliveshere wrote:

    “As someone who occupies both sides of this argument, I agree with the basic concept of what Wise says but strongly disapprove of the attitude he uses in saying it. There’s no place for condescending and arrogant put-downs in a community of progressives, ESPECIALLY from a white cisgendered able-bodied man.”–Multiracial Muse

    Yes. Thank you.

  68. gladystaca wrote:

    “Well, I can’t read minds, so forgive me if I don’t care much that you use a certain expression or don’t deconstruct every utterance or go on about gender studies and sexist ads. None of that ever got a person the right to vote or got the local health center up and running.”

    Spot on Jess.

    Making people walk on egg shells over obscure language they unintentionally used is hardly an aid to liberation. (Or maybe it’s intentionally used and the author is trying to lessen its charge or change its connotation.) If for disentangling history, go ahead, analyze language. But damn, if it’s not hate speech, chill and don’t get hung up on it. Or you might find yourself the only one damaged in the process, consumed by anger no one else is feeling.

    How can we ever be free of chains if we don’t imagine it, if we aren’t actively trying to taste freedom? So much traditional dance is about this exercise in living out freedom, even if the holistic sort is fleeting in the present. There is a huge give on and take this road and therefore no place for eternal disenchantment.

    Glad to see so many friends getting this article around. Plenty have posted it.

  69. bea wrote:

    @Juki Schor
    As a U.S. citizen, I see some truth in your perspective. What I find interesting is that some on the left, like Noam Chomsky, have been writing about our corrupt corporate welfare state for decades. Many people have long understood that what has come to pass in the U.S. economy recently, was just a matter of time. But did the vast majority of U.S. citizens listen to them? Of course not!

    How this ties into your comment is that U.S. voters tend to be short sighted in time and space. We react to what is happening RIGHT NOW, in our faces, and make all of our decisions in politics based on these immediate circumstances.

    Until voters here learn to take the long view, we will lack a national consciousness larger dynamics such as the elites periodically running in excesses of themselves at our expense.

  70. gatamala wrote:

    Well said multiracial muse. You have articulated [better than I ever could] the relationship between ideals and pragmatism.

    I reigned in my desire to go off on McCain supporters in the White House crowd on Tue. The fact that those guys had the balls to even go out there – with McCain pins on – IS progress. Besides, we do believe in a spectrum of views, correct?

    The thing is, extremes eventually have blowback (GDub’s house surrounded by jubilant and jeering revelers; ‘re-’ words). You have to shift thinking or you will exponentially breed discontented reactionaries.
    ****

    I left NC for a reason. I remember the racial epithets. But I also remember folks with buckets trying to put out a fire in my front yard that threatened our house. I get bored after a couple of days, but at least I can get some damn decent tea and some fresh air.

    My home state finally went from red to grey/yellow to [provisional] blue today. I have lived all over and it still feels like home. There are millions of folks living on the coasts that cringe at their homes in Indiana, Missouri, Virginia, Georgia, Louisiana. There are many more that tough it out and fight the good fight. Yet the good, the bad and the ugly of our hometowns helped shape who we are. I will not let laptop revolutionaries destroy our progress.
    ****
    Justice Scalia [scream] told our property class to amend the constitution or revolt. “Revolution” seems cute, until you realize that people will die. I wouldn’t say that Americans are “too afraid” to revolt. I’d say that Americans (many of whom fled violent circumstances) know better. As someone whose work is enmeshed in the greatest Transition of power, I’m grateful for that. As I have seen the last few days, the world is grateful for that too.

  71. RicardoLevinsMorales wrote:

    Tim Wise passes a harsh sentence on those he accuses of dismissing the “difference between Obama and McCain, between Democrats and Republicans, between Biden and Palin.” He declares:

    “those who cannot appreciate what has just transpired are so eaten up with nihilistic rage and hopelessness that I cannot but think that they are a waste of carbon, and actively thieving oxygen that could be put to better use by others.”

    It seems from his piece that his outrage is founded on a mixture of heartfelt frustrations and shallow analysis. The moment we are living is very complex and people respond to it differently based on their particular histories and the scars of struggle that they carry. Wise is responding to the veterans of Civil Rights struggles, such as Jesse Jackson, moved to tears by the ascendance of a dark-skinned man to the heights of the US political system. And who can fail to be moved at the spectacle of an elder whose parents were born into slavery casting a ballot for an African-descended president? It is an amazing vision. There are others who carry equally deep scars that owe to the betrayals of the Liberal power structure and the illusions so eagerly grasped by those who can afford them. The Black Power, Puerto Rican Independence, American Indian and other struggles have shouldered their share of suffering in the cause of justice. Theirs are also valid concerns. In an atmosphere of universal celebration it is natural that those who have survived past betrayals will emphasize caution. We see this around the world. The joy in central Africa at the astounding symbolism is countered with skepticism in the Middle East and West Asia where the foreign policy rubber meets the village road. Should our activist friends in those lands also be deprived of their right to oxygen because they demonstrate insufficient jubilation?

    To appreciate this historical moment requires holding two thoughts – which are in tension with each other – in our minds at the same time. This is not an exercise that USAmericans are traditionally comfortable with. Obama’s election indeed struck a blow to the ultra-Right sound machine. This is good and will be a rich source of insights. It is also of profound importance that for the first time the US Left has mobilized to elect a candidate the centerpiece of whose foreign policy is expanding a war Asia (a war in west Asia about control of oil and gas markets). It may well be studied by our opponents as a model for securing grassroots complicity with imperial foreign policies (Obama has voiced admiration for both Kennedy and Reagan as leaders who mobilized domestic unity in the service of interventionism). This may seem a trivial issue to Tim Wise but probably should not justify revoking the right to oxygen for people to whom it matters.

    It is not “nihilistic rage and hopelessness” to be aware of Obama ideological and practical commitments to some of the most reactionary forces in Latin America, Israel and Wall Street. It does not render us “all but useless to the liberation movement.” Actually, my brother, such awareness is the best antidote to cynicism. It is not yet fashionable to think these thoughts, but it is necessary.

    When Martin Luther King’s was cut down by assassins’ bullets, the leadership of the Civil Rights movement passed from a visionary revolutionary into the hands of the militant reformists who were the second tier of the movement. They aligned more closely with the Democratic politicians and many embraced the neo-liberal Bill Clinton administration. This does not take away anything from their sacrifices and their contributions to the struggle, but their emotional release does not excuse us from our scared calling to critical thinking and discussion. The stakes are too high for that.
    Tim is right; there are people in left politics who do not fully appreciate the deep symbolic significance of Obama’s election in this most racist land. There are others (I think Tim Wise included) who cannot see past it to the practical working of an empire in crisis which Obama has sworn to faithfully administer. I believe that we are about to witness the construction of an imperial unity government. This will be clearer within a week or two as the ministers are selected.

    We should understand that we are celebrating a symbolic victory but fighting a concrete battle. That is how we must try to heed Dr. King’s warning when he said that the American people “have been persuaded to accept token victories as indicative of genuine and satisfactory progress.” He went on:

    “But tokenism can now be seen not only as a useless, but as a genuine menace. It is a palliative which relieves emotional distress, but leaves the disease and its ravages unaffected.”

    To move on from here I suggest that we need to honor both dimensions of Dr. King’s equation; the emotional relief and the underlying power politics. It is possible to appreciate Obama’s win as the fruit of decades of heroic struggle while remaining sober about the new president’s alliances and loyalties. In fact it is the only way to truly honor that struggle.

    We will need to do more than just “get back to work.” The challenges ahead will call for re-envisioning what a real opposition movement could look like. They will also require us to demonstrate generosity of spirit and respect for each other’s legitimate perspectives if we are to hope to make it across a complex and poorly illuminated landscape.

  72. waxghost wrote:

    Talen and others who mentioned the same sentiment, I don’t think anyone here is forgetting that he is a politician. But I am unrestrainedly jubilant that we will finally – after eight long, dark years – have a Presidential administration that is not actively working against (and might even try to work for) the things I believe in.

  73. Free wrote:

    Being white has been the leading qualifier for the office of the President of the United States since 1776. Voters have ended for good [I hope] race as the de facto disqualifier for the job. I have misgivings about Obama but the stakes were too high to gamble away my vote on Ralph Nader. Black Canseco is correct in his assessment of Obama’s campaign. But I think that the problem lies with the mindset of the electorate, both young and old, that a black/bi-racial/mixed-race (take your pick) politician must ignore issues important to the communities and nations of color. His African family, barely mentioned in his biography. His father, a scourge. Jessie Jackson was right when he said that Barack Obama was talking down to black people. But that’s all over now. Let us not forget that he is everyones President, (let us not forget that has never been a concern about white Presidents)

    To the future: there is a lot of work to do.

  74. Charly wrote:

    A great article!

    This is just what Obama was getting at in his speech. Social change always has come about and always will come about from the bottom-up. We are the ones who have to bend the arc of the moral universe that Dr. King, and now President Obama, have mentioned.

    To the Hall of Justice, Superfriends!

  75. Charly wrote:

    Oh, one more comment. I live in Argentina currently (as Springsteen would say, and Reagan would misunderstand, I was born in the USA).

    The other day a friend here compared Obama’s election to Evo Morales (strictly in terms of the kind of sociocultural baggage he has to carry by virtue of being a “first”). Any thoughts?

    Keep fighting the good fight,
    C.

  76. PatrickInBeijing wrote:

    His victory brought tears to my eyes, and joy to my heart. The symbolic importance of America electing a Black man as President DOES matter, and it matters a lot. It is certainly not the end of the struggle, but an important milestone that has been reached far sooner than I thought. Some of my friends in Beijing thought that it could NEVER happen, that racism was too ingrained in America. They were surprised. And pleased.

    But Mr. Wise does the struggle a disfavor when he attacks the left. The left is not the enemy. The right is the enemy (look closely at some of the comments about Obama made by conservatives). While there is plenty of room for disagreement about our new president (and I am cynical, not about him as a person, but about the process and system in America, which I believe works against real equality), we who consider ourselves as part of a progressive tradition, should remember who are fighting.

    And if it is each other, we will never win. Mr. Wise should realize that demanding that everyone “on the left” march in synchronicity is both unrealistic, and not what we are supposed to be about. We should be clear about who our allies are, and who our enemies are. The idea that no one can criticize Obama is more like the Bush Republican ideology, than like anything that even vaguely should be called “leftist”.

    We need to remember what our common values are, and focus on those, not our disagreements. Otherwise, any victory will be short lived.

    Peace,

  77. Allison @ Entry Leve wrote:

    Wonderful highlights of the significance of this election. My concern, of course, is that incessant reference to his race and the almost suffocating focus on black americans’ response to this election does nothing for the post-racial delusion we put on him to deliver.

    But I applaud you still for not referencing Martin Luther King Jr. Too much of that going around for my liking.

    @Ricardo:
    “It is not “nihilistic rage and hopelessness” to be aware of Obama ideological and practical commitments to some of the most reactionary forces in Latin America, Israel and Wall Street. It does not render us “all but useless to the liberation movement.” Actually, my brother, such awareness is the best antidote to cynicism. It is not yet fashionable to think these thoughts, but it is necessary.”

    Brilliant response.

  78. Marcelo wrote:

    Presidential Campaign Budget for Barack Obama: $700,000,000+ (million)

    Presidential Campaign Budget for Cynthia McKinney (Green Party): $600,000

    And Tim Wise wonders how the Greens haven’t lift off? That fool needs to go back and read about capitalism.

  79. dvoyre wrote:

    Big thanks for Ricardo for that response. From the moment Obama’s victory was announced ’till now, I’ve received more text messages and emails– and seen other blogs and articles– making the same point as Tim Wise’s piece. And, each time I see/read these, I’ve felt silenced and misunderstood. I’ve also become very, very concerned about the implications for real movement building.

    My co-worker whom I deeply respect and with whom I’ve worked to confront racism as it surfaced during Obama’s campaign (she’s white and I’m white) was completely unable to hear any of my concerns about the lack of critical analysis re: Obama’s contradictions and context (as Ricardo so right-on describes them). She just looked at me and said “well, I guess it all just depends if you’re a glass half full or a glass half empty kind of person.”

    Critically examining the symbolism, reality and complexity of Obama is not indicative of a half-full glass. It’s a sign, I think, of the need to re-frame the glass itself. It’s about, as Ricardo says, holding multiple truths at the same time.

    As an anti-zionist Jewish person, I’ve been thinking a lot about this notion of holding multiple truths. I want my non-Jewish friends on the left who have yet to become involved in palestinian liberation organizing to understand that being critical of the Israeli government and of zionism is not anti-semitic or anti-jewish. And I want them to educate themselves about the history, activism and cultural expression of jewish people. And I want my activist non-Jewish friends who are are already involved with Palestinian liberation organizing to understand that being friends with Jewish people, attending Jewish cultural celebrations and so forth, does not mean that they’re a traitor to the cause. We need to practice flexing our holding many truths muscles. The recent Obama excitement is one huge opportunity to do this.

  80. aamer wrote:

    wow. ‘Screw you’ if you’re unhappy about the fact that Obama had to construct a ‘post-racial’ world in order to win? ‘Screw you’ if you’re worried about leaving troops in Iraq and sending more to Afghanistan? ‘Screw you’ if you feel like Obama’s victory still happened, to some extent, on white people’s terms?

    Obama’s election means more than simply progress for African Americans, which of course cannot be ignored. People should take whatever they want from this – my dad is a South-Asian Muslim immigrant in Australia who cried when he watched Obama win. He’s been waiting for this his whole life. I’m not going to take that from him, or anyone else. But I’m not going to be labelled as ‘anti-liberation’ for realising what this means for Empire, ie presenting a more seductive face for global capitalism.

    Im glad your kids can sleep, Tim, and I’m glad you can sell books about being an awesome anti-racist white dude. But this means things in the Gaza strip (where no doubt people are also celebrating) as much as it means things in the US. Already Team Obama has a hardcore Zionist (Rahm Emmanuel) as Chief of Staff and a woman with connections to the fascist Indian BJP (Sonal Shah) as part of the transition team. What ramifications these appointments will have we cannot say, but excuse me for being sceptical. No doubt a Democrat administration will make life marginally more tolerable than the Republicans. But Obama being better than the christo-fascist bogeymen will be little comfort to the people who have to suffer under wider imperialism.

    There are people who think there is no difference between McCain and Obama, and rightly so. They are the have-nots, not of just in the US, but across the world. They are the victims of Free Trade Agreements, the War on Terror, and neoliberalism. Of a global order that is enforced and legitimised by the United States’ position as a military and economic superpower every single day. I don’t comfortably place those things in the ‘no shit, Sherlock’ file, and the glib suggestion that that’s where those issues belong – on the shelf for the duration of the party – pisses me off.

    I think it’s important to discuss the victory within the US, but that shouldn’t mean that everyone needs to shut up about the concessions that had to be made, and for the suffering that will be facilitated by the Obama administration. It is arrogant and presumptuous to suggest that people need to shelve their scepticism, or that we need to ignore the deep, deep concessions and compromises that a black man had to make in order to get over the line.

  81. Abu Dharr wrote:

    Wonderful reflections, Tim Wise.
    Indeed, let us begin…

    Peace to everyone