Open Thread – Ashley Todd

by Latoya Peterson

This is Ashley Todd.

According to the Smoking Gun:

OCTOBER 23–Shortly before a John McCain campaign volunteer was reportedly robbed at knifepoint and had a “B” carved in her face after her assailant noticed that her car carried a McCain bumper sticker, the woman blogged last night that she was “Stubbornly searching for a bank of america to avoid ATM fees” and had somehow ended up “on the wrong side of pittsburgh.” Ashley Todd, a 20-year-old Texas college student, told cops that she was robbed of $60 by a 6′ 4″ black man who weighed about 200 pounds. Todd claimed that when her assailant noticed the McCain sticker on her vehicle, he punched her in the head and carved the letter on her right cheek (a battered Todd can be seen at right).

TMZ reports that she added sexual assault to the story, later stating the assailant had fondled her breast.

After the police investigated, and voiced their suspicions about her injuries being self-inflicted, she recanted the story.

Some thoughts:

1. Interesting that a McCain supporter went through the trouble of making up an elaborate hoax, when another man was shot for wearing a Barack Obama tee shirt, and an Obama volunteer was actually attacked during canvassing:

As Eugenia posted earlier this week, a Barack Obama volunteer, 58-year-old Nancy Takehara of Chicago, was physically assaulted on Saturday by a homeowner while canvassing in Caledonia, Wisconsin. Takehara told a local television station that the man “grabbed me by the back of the neck” and “was pounding on my head and screaming.” According to Takehara, the man yelled, among other things, that “we’re not his people, we’re probably with ACORN.”

The attacker has now been identified as 71-year-old Ronald Goetsch, a McCain supporter and Marine veteran who has donated to the McCain campaign. In a local television interview, Goetsch admits that he attacked Takehara after engaging her in a verbal dispute. Goetsch claims that Takehara was “being loud” but acknowledges that she did not physically threaten him in any way.

The local Republican party released a loathsome statement that expressed no regret or sympathy over the attack. Instead, it actually seemed to justify Goetsch’s statements to Takehara by again raising the phony specter of ACORN: “As we read press accounts of alleged violence against an Obama campaign worker and accounts of ACORN registration fraud, coupled with daily complaints from both parties of stolen or vandalized yard signs, the Racine County Republican Party would like to encourage supporters of both sides to take a deep breath…” Talk about blaming the victim.

(Thanks jmn for the tip.)

2. I am also finding it interesting how this woman is able to immediately turn around an claim mental issues (See links, where she describes how she suddenly doesn’t remember how she got a backwards B on her face or how she sustained her injuries.) She may very well have them – but that does not excuse racist behavior. I also find it interesting that her twitter feed proves that most of this was premeditated, so even though she is being charged with a false report, it probably won’t stick.

3. I understand all the arguments that women should be believed when they report a sexual assault. And I advocate for this whole heartedly – way too many women feel as though they won’t be believed, which leads them to shy away from reporting sexual assault or rape. Yet, I notice there is no similar concern for the black men who are often targeted in these kinds of vague cases (and have already have to live with the big black boogeyman specter looming over them, as ?uestlove’s post on Okayplayer noted.) When will we talk about the toll on black men, knowing that they somehow always fit the description? But no, I’m sure this will be yet another “isolated incident.”

4. Message to the GOP: When someone shows up with that kind of story with a backwards B on her face, do us all a favor: wait and get the bank security tapes first before you alert the media. Would have saved you all a bunch of embarrassment.

5. Props to the Jezebel commenters who brought up To Kill a Mockingbird. It’s not like we haven’t seen this script before.

6. Props to the Pittsburgh police department:


UPDATED
: Melissa Harris Lacewell weighs in:

Todd’s story resonates with this historic script, but it is critically important to point out how the end of the story radically deviates from lynching narratives. In this case the police were immediately suspicious of Todd. They did not initiate a manhunt in black communities surrounding Pittsburgh. Instead they subjected Todd to a lie detector test. When she failed they pressed her for a confession. Yolanda, this ending makes all the difference because it points to the fact that black people are not totally outside the protection of the law. It points to the reality that our citizenship status today is different than it was in 1900. It points to the reality of change across time.

Is racism still alive in America? Yes. Is racial inequality still deep, pervasive, and meaningful in the lives of black Americans. Yes. Did the police believe Ashley Todd? No. Was anyone lynched as a result of her lies? No. That matters to me.

I am utterly exhausted with having to defend my brothers, father, uncles, lovers, friends, and students against the racist assumption that black men are uniquely prone to violence. So many of the black men that I know and love are gentle, funny, smart and cool. I am disgusted with the reality that as we stand on the precipice of electing the first black president we are still haunted by the lie of the violent, black madman.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. News for October 27 - Xenia Institute on 27 Oct 2008 at 8:31 am

    [...] Related link: Open Thread: Ashley Todd  |  Racialicious [...]

  2. Interlude: The Hilarious Stupidity of Ashley Todd « Token Minorities on 27 Oct 2008 at 3:30 pm

    [...] Interlude: The Hilarious Stupidity of Ashley Todd October 27, 2008 So by now everyone should know that Ashley Todd, the McCain supporter who fabricated a story about being assaulted and groped by a knife-wielding black man for $60 and some press for Obama by way of a (backwards) “B” on her cheek. Racialicious has a good summary of coverage over at their open thread. [...]

Comments

  1. AmericanFamily wrote:

    I also find it interesting that there was another report about an Obama canvasser who was attacked, but it got very little media attention. The attack on Asian Obama volunteer seemed to have racist undertones at the very least.

    You can read about it here:
    http://tinyurl.com/6ke9q2

    and a follow up article here:
    http://tinyurl.com/647kog

    Mod Note - This is the same incident that is referenced in item one of this post. – LDP

  2. Westerly wrote:

    I think that this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe-5nr3NK34

    is pretty revealing about her attitude towards black men. Lucky her, that everything gets to be a lark.

    I think she’ll be aiming to portray herself as a sufferer of Borderline Personality Disorder (especially with the ’self-mutilation’ and all.) Me? I’ve known people who are genuinely mentally ill – and not one of them has ever had the time or the inclination to pull off such a calculated, coolly premeditated stunt.

    Talk about manipulative. She knew the lay of the social and political landscape when she decided to pull out the “6 ft. 4 black man” card.

    On the other hand, I’ve come across girls like her all the time – girls of the white, spoilt, privileged variety who can afford to manufacture drama left, right, and centre in order to while away her spare time, and never have to spare a thought over any of the fall-out of their actions (since they won’t be the ones who suffer from it.)

    And of course someone or something else is always to blame. In an article on the net she’s blaming the media for not detecting that the story was a fake AND for “turning” it into a political story.

    Even if she does actually suffer from some form of mental illness. What of it? You can’t conflate mental illness with racism OR act as if the two are mutually exclusive. You can be racist and manic depressive, racist and an alzeihmer’s suffer, racist and schizophrenic and so forth.

  3. Rachel wrote:

    Thank you for point #3 – while I spend a whole lot of time worrying about sexual violence against women, you clearly and succinctly stated something I needed to be reminded of: that black men can never stop worrying either.

    And my comparison was to Birth of a Nation. This is some seriously f’d up shit.

  4. Renee wrote:

    What bothers me about this is the fact that once again we have a white woman accusing a black male of violence. How long do black man have to be demonized in the name of the purity of the white female?
    This has serious consequences. When I heard about this, I kept seeing images of Emmitt Till in my head. Black men have paid with their lives because of the social construction that they are savage rapists. So many people were quick to believe her story and McCain and Palin even called this woman. She may claim mental illness but her choice of a black male attacker was not accidental. She chose an attacker that she felt would be most likely be believed. It was racist and that needs to be said.
    As I look at my children, I know that it is only a matter of time before this construction attaches itself to their bodies and it makes me ill.

  5. lacy wrote:

    As a Pittsburgh resident, I am so happy to see how our police force handled this. They don’t have the best reputation, but they got this one right.

    Also, when I first heard this story, I was extremely skeptical…partially because it too easily fit a white racist narrative that she could easily exploit, but also because of the location of the alleged assault. Liberty Ave in Bloomfield at that time of the evening is crawling with people, so it would be very hard for this to happen without witnesses. Also, this is an extremely diverse neighborhood: young, white 20-something hipsters, elderly Italians with Virgin Mary statues in their yards, and, yes, black people. Apparently the “wrong side of Pittsburgh” is one that represents a mix of classes, races, ages, and ethnicities in a way few other neighborhoods in this city really can.

    All in all, I’m happy this was cleared up so quickly.

  6. La ~ wrote:

    I know white I say may not be received well, and this is an open thread. Allow me to voice my opinion.

    “”Yet, I notice there is no similar concern for the black men who are often targeted in these kinds of vague cases (and have already have to live with the big black boogeyman specter looming over them, as ?uestlove’s post on Okayplayer noted.) When will we talk about the toll on black men, knowing that they somehow always fit the description? “”

    Yet, in all the midst of this “fighting for the black man victimhood”, and “the black male always fitting the racist description fight”. The black male population still somehow see the black female as the enemy, not the racist white females who usually puts them in harms way, or the white females who initiated trouble while lurking somewhere backdrop (Jena Six, John White/Daniel Cicciaro Jr). And countless others, where white females were the root cause. Now black females have to come in and do clean up damage for the poor black male. Black men also need to help “talk about the toll” and burdens of black womenhood.

    Lucky for a lot of black males in that area, the people who helped squished this potential man hunt were… black females in key positions. Let it had been white females or white men, I suspect it would have tangled on a little longer.

    As for Todd, I have no sympathy for her. This should not be a slap on the wrist, this is similar to terrorism and pre-meditated intent to cause rioting and fear mongering. I was not surprised when that white privileged “mental illness” rational got thrown in so quickly. They would have called me a vindictive wench, and scream to off with my black head.

    I demand an apology from McCain. He would have demanded one from Obama.

  7. Whitney wrote:

    Reminds me of this case:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Smith

    It’s because of wolf-criers like these that real victims aren’t taken seriously. and it’s people like this who continue to perpetuate old, tired, untrue stereotypes.

  8. ambien wrote:

    I think some Republicans paid her to do this, this is way too absurd and ambitiously stupid a plan for one person to come up with.

  9. ill Mami wrote:

    As someone who works in the mental health field, I am not really that surprised by Ms. Todd’s fabricated story. Initially, I thought that she suffered from some sort of a psychotic disorder like schizophrenia. People who have endured long battles with psychosis aren’t always the most savvy of people since they often interpret their world in a very all or nothing, concrete way. But I have to say I agree with Westerly who wrote that Todd’s story was too cold and calculated.

    I have always maintained with my patients that their mental illness is not an excuse to act a fool. It is not an excuse. If Todd does indeed have a mental illness, and her superficially scratching a backwards “B” on her face with such a steady hand does not make her Borderline IMO, she is insulting those who are mentally ill everywhere.

  10. DollyAnn wrote:

    This is so twisted. I agree with you, Latoya; regardless of whether the girl has mental problems or not, that does not make the racism okay. And that was why I was glad to see Eugene Robinson, Rachel Maddow, and Melissa Harris-Lacewell talk about this on MSNBC last night. I was afraid it would just get brushed over as “Oh, the girl has problems; we can’t blame her too much.” I wanted to see someone acknowledge that Todd came up with that SPECIFIC scenario for SPECIFIC reasons–to incite further racism and hatred in this presidential election.

    And can you imagine what would have happened had the story even been partially true? The media would have undoubtedly blown it out of proportion as another example of black man = defiler of delicate white woman. Then people would question Barack Obama on the grounds that mabe he’s just another one of those “barbarian” black men. And regardless of the fact that McCain can joke about rape, fail to repudiate sexist comments about Hillary Clinton, and put sarcastic quotes around “women’s health,” he’d be seen as a protector of women. It’s really sickening.

  11. EvilAngelfish wrote:

    Equating complaints of stolen lawn signs with a physical assault on a 58 year old woman? I’m sorry, but the Racine County Republican Party seems like a bunch of jerks. Oh wait, let me not throw out careless generalizations. The members of the Racine County Republican Party who approved of the statement seem like jerks.

  12. drispe wrote:

    Naturally the GOP’s response is to offer her all the help she needs in overcoming mental problems. They never extended this help to anyone they demonized for committing a crime before. She may be crazy as hell, but she was in her right mind when she carved up her face hoping a random darkie would get blamed.

  13. jen* wrote:

    I don’t know if she’s got mental issues or not, but that may be the case. Angry as it makes me to have another white woman lying about a black man/black men, I can’t get behind the folks leaving really hateful messages on her youtube vid comments. (Although one truly confused me, from user
    Magurufukuru : “Man I hope OJ Simpson comes back from the grave to haunt your racist ass.” – I thought OJ was still alive. Oh well.)

    One thing that stands out to me, is how differently this played than the whole Susan Smith fiasco. No one jumped up to sketch ‘the perp’ and put out an APB on black males from 18-65, 5′9″ to 6′8″, 180-300lbs…you know. And yet, here we are. 10 days before electing a black president, we still hear the same stories.

  14. browne wrote:

    When I first heard this I knew it was a lie, but it is still scary.

    Browne

  15. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @La -

    Yet, in all the midst of this “fighting for the black man victimhood”, and “the black male always fitting the racist description fight”. The black male population still somehow see the black female as the enemy, not the racist white females who usually puts them in harms way, or the white females who initiated trouble while lurking somewhere backdrop (Jena Six, John White/Daniel Cicciaro Jr). And countless others, where white females were the root cause. Now black females have to come in and do clean up damage for the poor black male. Black men also need to help “talk about the toll” and burdens of black womenhood.

    Yes, this is an open thread, but if you’re going to jump on a soapbox, make sure it’s the right one.

    1. In this case, this story was completely fabricated. There were no black males to save as none committed a crime in the first place.

    2. I’m not sure which black men you refer to that see us as the enemy, and I absolutely hate that line of reasoning where we lump all black men into the behaviors of a few ignorant fools.

    3. I am also not convinced that white girls are the root of much of these problems, particularly in this situation – again, fabricated story, no man around.

    4. If you have paid any attention to this site, you will notice that we generally talk about issues in the black community from a black female perspective. I write, Wendi has written, Nadra writes, AJ writes. Merq and Sewere also represent black maleness. We’re all well aware that black female issues do not get as much mainstream attention as
    black male issues.

    5. Black men do need to talk about the toll on black women – but in this case, we aren’t really the ones who would have been affected by a manhunt. Chances are low that I will be hauled into a precinct on someone else’s vague description of a sexual assault. However, I know three men who fit the description of “6″4 black male” – luckily, we are no where near there.

    6. As a final note, I will caution you strongly that I have *zero* interest in hyping the gender wars. This is not the place to be if you want to rage against members of the opposite sex who belong to your ethnic group. I’ve happily deleted comments from Asian men pissed at *all* Asian women, black women pissed at *all* black men, white men angry at *all* white women, and so on. Point is no one wants to be blamed for something they didn’t do, and no one wants to deal with someone else’s baggage.

    Yet, one of things that I do like about the men who read and participate here on Racialicious is that for the most part, they get it. They may not see or understand everything, but they have generally been open to listening to the conversations women have about these issues. Go look up the reactions to the thread I posted about catcalling. Two or three men being stupid, and a whole lot of men reading, sympathizing, and understanding.

    If you have issues with black men on other forums, take your fight there. But the men here don’t deserve that kind of ire, especially when they’ve done nothing to earn it.

  16. Renee wrote:

    @LA, I won’t say that you don’t have a point when it comes to black men and sexism. Yes the black male patriarchy does exist however not every single black man denies his gender privilege. As I said in an earlier comment I am the mother of two black boys and if you cannot be upset for the men walking around today think of the children who will be wearing the mantle of black rapist in the future. My oldest 7 and I predict he is only about 6-8 years away from people crossing the street when they seem him because they will view him as a threat.
    We need to fight these constructions for the sake of our children, our fathers, brothers and cousins etc.. We call ourselves a black community for a reason and if even one of us is unsafe then we all are. We are not disconnected beings. When you demonize black men, you also damage the black mothers who raised them. Always remember the connections before you allow anger to overwhelm you.

  17. R. Prince wrote:

    Oh God, I caught this story last night. I can just imagine what she told herself to justify this act, that “it is unfair that McCain, that innocent, poor little white man he is, is using his head and political knowledge to gain votes while Obama is just playing off of his blackness to guilt people into voting for him, that’s why he’s so popular, etc, etc. How unfair, reverse discrimination! I’ll show them!”
    oh brother….. I don’t believe for one minute she’s mentally ill, that is if you don’t count the psychotic delusions and anxieties about race in this country.

  18. Anonymous wrote:

    There should be more said by McCain in condeming these types of people.

    Yes, get her some help, but what she did was calculated. I’m sure her history may have other behaviors that cause concern.

    I’m not impressed with the surface talks of healing and acceptence of diversity. We’ve only just begun…

  19. broom wrote:

    i bet sarah palin herself gave this girl her black eye. i mean, someone had to do it, and i bet this pr move goes all the way to the top

  20. NancyP wrote:

    What is amazing about the whole thing is that she claimed that all this took place at an ATM – AFAIK or have seen, all ATMs either have a camera with a wide angle lens in the machine itself or mounted high above the machine. And the backward “B” screams “mirror”, ie, self-inflicted. However did this woman manage to graduate from high school? Or was she drunk out of her skull when cooking up the idea and carrying it out?

    I suspect that she got hit by her boyfriend, and wanted to cover up the rather noticeable fact by faking an assault – and getting in a little racist publicity against the Obama campaign and Obama. Or perhaps she was paid to do this, and just happened to have a black eye or be exceedingly good at makeup (notice that there is no redness of the whites of that eye).

  21. Alexandra wrote:

    This disgusts me to no end. I can’t believe all she got was filing a false police report, she could have put someone in serious danger because her lies. I love how people are acting like she made up this wild and crazy story thus she is mentally ill and needs when she didn’t have to go that far come up with this “scenario”.

  22. Sean wrote:

    Much obliged, Latoya. One of the reasons I like this site is because of the intellegent discourse and the respite from “finger-pointing.”

    …and yes, unfortunately it appears that the imaginary, black boogeyman has struck again.

    What I can figure out is that, yeah, this person is a racist, so her story doesn’t surprise me. What’s hard to fathom is the idea that she literally beat herself, uh, black and blue!

    She reminds me of Ed Norton in that movie “Fight Club.”

  23. Renee wrote:

    @ Anon 18 McCain is proud of his supporters remember

  24. Jess wrote:

    This made me think of a case you all may not remember (I know I am generalizing here) — Charles Stuart.

    For those that don’t know this was back in the 80s — yeah, ancient history. Anyhow, he said a black man attacked him and his wife and there was a whole manhunt going on in Dorchester (Boston). Crazy.

    This time around it was different. And that’s a good thing. But it makes me sad that this is a woman of the party of Lincoln.

    Think about it. In 1950 few black folks would ever have voted for a Democrat. The Dems were the ones running the south. They were the ones who set up segregation and the horrible social system designed to perpetuate slavery in another form.

    Now? The GOP is the party of David Duke.

    Christ on a cracker, what the hell happened? Are there any Republicans out there willing to denounce this kind of thing? If you are reading this, tell me how the hell the party that has two heroes of mine — Teddy Roosevelt and Eisenhower (because he enforced the Brown decision, among others) became a bunch of pseudo-fascists?

    This woman played right into the same old same old, and this time nobody fell for it. Good on the Steel City cops.

    (It would be interesting to check the racial composition of the police — word has it that when they make an attempt at hiring minorities it cuts down on a lot of the crazy bullsh*t — and makes it possible to root out stuff like this).

    Mental problems? So what. McCain, denounce this now if you have an ounce of integrity. Please.

  25. Bagelsan wrote:

    I was not surprised when that white privileged “mental illness” rational got thrown in so quickly.

    I agree that her gentle treatment was 100% white privilege in action, but I want to be really clear about the mental illness thing, and that that’s *not* privileged. I’m assuming you’re not actually saying that all mentally ill white people use that as a get-out-of-jail-free card, right? If she *is* mentally ill that can’t be discounted just ’cause she’s privileged in the skin color arena. (For the record, I don’t personally think she IS mentally ill, at least not nearly to the extent that would excuse this kind of racist crap she’s trying to pull. But I just wanted to kinda clarify; I don’t want her lies to ruin things for people who really *do* suffer from mental illness.)

    I think it’s a nice (terrible?) example of “racist” people vs. racism in society: her lying about a black man = she’s racist … her correctly assuming that a lot of people would believe it = institutional racism!

  26. Phil Deeze wrote:

    Melissa Lacewell Harris was dead on accurate.

    And the idea of the 6′4″ (big) dark-skinned (of course) black boogeyman/super criminal smacks of Willie Horton. Truly does. Ashley Todd even added in the sexual assault angle to amp it up a bit.

    Kudos to the Pittsburgh po-po for doing the right thing and investigating this before kicking in doors, throwing 5′8″ light-skinned black men up on the hoos of cars, etc. This probably saved the people of Pittsburgh a lot of tax money had a police officer used excessive force to apprehend a black midget on suspicion of being the boogeyman, the police department’s liability policy would have been tapped yet again. (Remember Johnny Gammedge.)

    The taxpayers pay when cops do stupid shit. Had they even detained a black guy walking down the street for five seconds about this contrived crap this woman came up with, they po-po should’ve had to pay. Again, glad that nobody got thrown up on the hood of a car or a gun shoved in their momma or girlfriend’s face over it.

    I’ve heard Susan Smith and Charles Stuart mentioned. Go back to Boston and the curious case of Dee Brown and what happened to him when he tried to take possession of a house he’d purchased. Nice neighbors. And before anyone says it’s because Brown never won the Celtics anything, remember that someone busted into Bill Russell’s house, stole his title rings and then took a dump on his bed. Shit happens.

  27. Cecelia wrote:

    If anything this election is showing us all how alive and well racism is in this country. Sad to say but we have a long way to go here if we do choose to unite and not be divisive in who we are as people of all different backgrounds.

    I have always known it was alive and well – just seeing what I see in Detroit or being a Native woman – I feel and experience so much stuff on an everyday basis in my own life.

  28. StarInaPaperCup wrote:

    You know, the first thing I thought of when I heard this story was the Tawana Brawley case, because they’re both very racialized, fraudulent accusations of sexual violence made by women. The balance of power between the two is so lop-sided, though – even 20 years after the fact, conservatives still drag up the topic of Tawana Brawley from time to time. They just wouldn’t let it alone – a black girl who dared accuse white males of a sexual crime?

    ‘Unthinkable’, they thought.
    ‘How dare she?’, they wondered.
    ..and so on.

    Something tells me, though, that they (i.e. mainstream media) won’t still be talking about Todd in 20 days, let alone 20 years. The image of a big ol’ scary black dude accosting a white lady for no apparent reason looms large in the minds of the white MSM; so focusing on this particular false accusation doesn’t lend their other ideas much credibility.

    At any rate, there’s just a lot of hate going around right now – McCain-Palin rallies really don’t look or sound any different than lynch mobds these days. It’s a vicious hatred borne of desperation.

  29. mj wrote:

    Thanks for your great work to end sexist, racist, heterosexist, capitalist oppression. Your words are great and I love sharing your blog with my students.

  30. atlasien wrote:

    If this was a calculated act, it was calculated very poorly. Thinking that anyone would believe her when they saw the backwards “B”… that’s completely insane.

    I don’t think the individual racism that triggered her delusional state was all that noteworthy. What’s interesting is how many people really wanted to believe her and promulgate her story, when if they thought about it for even half a freaking second it was totally obvious she was lying. The real damage here comes from people believing and spreading these kinds of stories.

  31. dangrsmind wrote:

    I don’t buy this kid Garcia’s story. He believed Ashley? Sorry this just doesn’t hold water.

    The guy is a law student and obviously not stupid. I conclude therefore that he was part of the plan from the beginning possibly with the help of some of the other geniuses at LITF or CNRC. They planned the hoax for the day before Hannity was going to be in town, and after telling the police their story sent the picture on to the CNRC so that they could be passed on to Drudge et al. Garcia sent the pictures and now he’s throwing Ashley to the wolves. Nice work there guy.

    My radar says that this kid’s story stinks to high heaven. He’s lying and he’s neck deep in this just like Ashley.

  32. Lyonside wrote:

    >But it makes me sad that this is a woman of the party of Lincoln.

    Think about it. In 1950 few black folks would ever have voted for a Democrat. The Dems were the ones running the south. They were the ones who set up segregation and the horrible social system designed to perpetuate slavery in another form.

    Now? The GOP is the party of David Duke.

    Christ on a cracker, what the hell happened
    ————-

    1. Not all Democrats – the party in the northern states w/out formal Jim Crow segregation (but tons of de facto segregation) realized earlier in the 20th century that for unions to be effective, they would have to include more than white workers alone, since many industries were hiring white, black, and brown people as low-level laborers. The power of the unions is one factor in seperating the Dixiecrats from the rest of the party. After Wallace ran for the presidency, the Dixiecrats moved en masse, it seems, to the Republican party.

    Since then, the GOP has not been
    “the party of Lincoln” – parties change, even when the names stay the same.

  33. sfsinger wrote:

    Whether that lying piece of race baiter is mental or not – we don’t actually know that for a fact and only have HER WORD to base this on – she knows the difference between right and wrong. She is also feigning memory lapses and has since stated she didn’t do anything wrong and doesn’t understand what the media scrutiny is over.

    I am seriously wondering if the McCain campaign encouraged her to lie so they could cause maximum damage in PA and have it spread to peel away Obama supporters. The Communications Director pushed this lie and embellished it. They sent the photo to Drudge. This was not a coincidence!!! It was just poorly planned and cowardly.

    I am sooo disgusted!

  34. broom wrote:

    it just occured to me what a great halloween costume this would be

  35. Sean wrote:

    Re: Jess post #24

    Yes, I remember the Charles Stuart case quite vividly. In that instance, he claimed he was sitting in a car with his pregnant wife, when a superhumanly flexible and limber black man jumped into the back seat. This boogeyman was apparently a black stretch Armstrong, because he somehow managed to fire a bullet into her belly from an awkward angle… killing her and the baby.

    Despite the obvious inhuman flexibility it would take to perform such a feat, the Boston Police department declared a virtual martial law against black men, and was quite grotesque in their aggressive racist “investigation”.
    Bust heads first, ask questions later was the apparent credo.

    The sad thing about THIS particular situation is that this idiot has made it THAT much harder for those women who have legitimate grievances to be taken seriously.

    And yes, this election is akin to overturning a big rock that hasn’t been moved in a while, and watching the creepy-crawlies scatter out.

  36. roschelle wrote:

    Cindy McCain questioned Obama’s character yesterday in New Mexico. They still haven’t learned…if you live in a glass house…you should keep your stones in your pocket!

  37. Renee wrote:

    @Sean
    The sad thing about THIS particular situation is that this idiot has made it THAT much harder for those women who have legitimate grievances to be taken seriously.

    In this I disagree. White women will always have their claims of being attacked by a black man looked at seriously even in cases where it is blatant fabrication.

  38. Ric Caric wrote:

    Some brief thoughts:

    1. In some ways, Ashley Todd’s racial fantasy is an indication of new kinds of symbolic strategies among white racists. It’s important to remember that the dominant fantasy in Todd’s story was being politically oppressed by having a B written into her skin. Thus, Todd associates the image of a large and sexually aggressive black male with the spectre of Obama’s political power in a way that appears to enhance the racial stereotype even more.

    2. Todd’s story is thus an indication of the complex ambivalences associated with the figure of Barack Obama. Certainly, an Obama victory would be a sign of considerable racial progress. But the Ashley Todd case indicates that an Obama ascendancy would also trigger a wave of symbolic creativity among white racists.

    3. Actually, Ashley Todd isn’t the worst of it. There’s considerable chatter at my 98% white university in Eastern Kentucky about the likelihood of Obama being assassinated if he’s elected.

    4. Speaking of teaching in Eastern Kentucky, most students in my classes support Obama.

    5. But Ashley Todd looks like a lot of my students.

  39. gatamala wrote:

    Is there a “bottom” in this race to the bottom?

  40. Phil Deeze wrote:

    @ Sean,
    And you’ll remember that in the Susan Smith case, her “composite sketch” of the black boogeyman that stole her car with her two sons strapped in it looked like Snoop Doggy Dog, replete with skull cap and everything.
    And those idiot-ass cops rousted folks for no reason. What happened in Boston with the Charles Stuart and the Dee Brown cases were just flat-out abominations.
    Street crime (crack dealing and carjacking) were the “it” crimes of the day. Everyone was afraid of them. But the cops in Boston were SO effective, they were able to elicit a false confession before Charles Stuart’s story started to unravel (the dumb bastard started hitting the insurance money quickly, buying gifts and other extras.) How much did they have to torture someone to get them to cop to something they didn’t do, or worse yet: how many black folks in the neighborhood pointed the finger at a neighbor that got him in front of bloodthirsty Boston police detectives. Had that reporter not asked some KEY questions about the night that Stuart claimed he and his wife were jacked, whoever was in custody (and fingered in a line-up by Stuart) would’ve been in jail.

  41. Winn wrote:

    @Bagelsan,

    Cosign! At the risk of a slight thread derailment, while I am in no way excusing this girl’s behavior or even suggesting she has a substantiated diagnosed mental illness (although media reports have referred to a “history of mental illness” I have yet to see this documented), there have been a number of very dismissive comments regarding mental illness made here and it is not clear that the skepticism is about this specific girl’s claims of mental illness or of mental illness itself. I am a therapist and work in an inpatient psychiatric unit: trust me, when you work daily with people who are in a manic state due to bipolar disorder, who are experiencing psychotic symptoms, who sit in the same contorted physical position for hours due to catatonia, you will not be so quick to put the term mental illness in quotes. Once of the greatest deterrents to those with mental illness seeking treatment, especially in communities of color, before they come in contact with the police, is the dismissive attitude toward mental illness as something made up or associated with white privilege and affluence. Mental illness does not excuse behavior, and if you realized how many people currently incarcerated are mentally ill, you would realize why many refer to the prison system as the “new asylums”. The privilege comes in when treatment is disproportionately presented as an option for whites with mental illness over people of color, but that is a separate issue from the concreteness of diagnosable mental illness itself.

    Westerly also made a number of fantastic points, one of which is that mental illness does not preclude racism, and they often go hand in hand. But one point of clarification about Borderline Personality Disorder: although I am not suggesting Todd actually suffers from BPD, if she did, this would not mean she couldn’t still calculate and premeditate this hoax, and that BPD could not have influenced that plan. This is a personality disorder, after all, as distinct from other forms of mental illness like mood disorders, psychotic disorders or anxiety disorders, and is all about attention-seeking, abandonment avoidance, and identity disturbance. People assume mental illness suggests irrationality and lack of impulse control, but personality disorders like BPD often lead to very contrived and specific behaviors designed to provoke a response. Within that context, a person could have a diagnosable mental illness, but that would not prevent them from understanding the difference between “right and wrong”, which is the usual legal standard for determining diminished responsibility. Under that standard, Todd would fail even if she is mentally ill.

  42. stella wrote:

    I hope people start wearing “B” on their faces just to mock the McCain campaign for using this woman’s story for votes.

  43. Restructure! wrote:

    I wonder why the pre-recantation news reports don’t mention that the “B” was backwards.

    I know that the backwards “B” suggests a mirror, but what was the “B” supposed to mean?

    Also, lie detectors are unreliable as lie detectors, but I guess in this case, it worked to convince Todd into confessing that she lied.

  44. Michelle wrote:

    Tawana Brawley still maintains that she was a victim and that she didn’t make things up. Even after 20 years.

    This woman admitted that she made it up after, a week?

    Not the same thing.

    I can’t co-sign uttering Tawana Brawley’s name with this woman’s.

  45. Renee wrote:

    I just found out about a black man that was dragged 70 feet to his death in East Texas last month. They are not declaring it a hate crime though clearly race was an issue. I could not help when reading this to think about the fact that a white woman who alleges a crime by a black man gets instant attention and yet a man violently loses his life and no one is talking about it. This incident serves as further proof that black men are only seen as committing crimes and not as crime victims.

  46. Whitney wrote:

    @Restructure!: the “B” is supposed to stand for “Barack.”

  47. Westerly wrote:

    @Winn:
    “But one point of clarification about Borderline Personality Disorder: although I am not suggesting Todd actually suffers from BPD, if she did, this would not mean she couldn’t still calculate and premeditate this hoax, and that BPD could not have influenced that plan. This is a personality disorder, after all, as distinct from other forms of mental illness like mood disorders, psychotic disorders or anxiety disorders, and is all about attention-seeking, abandonment avoidance, and identity disturbance. People assume mental illness suggests irrationality and lack of impulse control, but personality disorders like BPD often lead to very contrived and specific behaviors designed to provoke a response.”

    I agree Winn. The rate at which the mentally ill are incarcerated is incredibly telling, and belies the idea that the mental illness is a ‘pass’. If anything, they tend to be punished harshly and often unfairly.

    Regarding your point about the difference between mental illness and personality disorders – it’s a distinction that I haven’t made when I’ve argued here, or elsewhere. But what you’ve said is true. (Sociopaths are also another group that are able to plan in minute detail.)

    Which brings me back to this case. While I’m not going to question the legitimacy of BPD as a disorder, I will say that one of the problems with the BPD diagnosis is the ‘borderline’ aspect of it, insofar as it encompasses a lot of behaviours/characteristics that may be annoying, worrisome, or self-destructive but aren’t necessarily the result of a medical disorder.

    A lot of the behaviours that are characteristic of BPD aren’t that distinct from a Western notion of “typical” adolescent behaviour. At what point do you decide which behaviour to medicalise? And it’s not difficult for the privileged and badly- behaved to get/use a diagnosis such as BPD as a safety net or an excuse.

    So for some (probably the majority) mental illness and disorder leads to injustice and deprivation, but for a select group of others it actually functions as a tool or a privilege…

    Which leads me to Ashley Todd. I’ll admit I’m rather sceptical in this case but I’ll concede that she may have a genuine illness or disorder which may in part have inspired her to do what she did. But if it is a factor, it’s not the only element in play and it intersects with (rather than causes) her overt racism.

    But I think the thing that is most telling is the way that she’s conducted herself in the aftermath – there’s been no remorse on her part or hint that she is going to take repsonsibility. Having a mental illness/disorder doesn’t exempt you from apologising in the aftermath. But instead, she blames the media.

    Blaming the media for ‘politicising’ the story has nothing to do with BDP (real or alleged) and everything to do with being snotty and privileged in my view.

  48. Black Canseco wrote:

    for what’s it worth i dropped a piece on this the other day focusing mainly on the mental illness aspect.

    http://www.hustleknockin.com/hustleknockin/2008/10/a-big-black-barack-guy-attacked-me.html

  49. Asada wrote:

    @ renee

    yes, my father once told me there are some parts of America you cannot drive through and expect to come out alive.
    Makes me wonder if I will have to leave the USA for awhile when things start to fall apart with the economy and tensions really get violent and regular. I live in the Northeast but STILL.

  50. Black Canseco wrote:

    part of what bothers me about this story is that once again, when there’s a case of asinine behavior by a white female culprit, the feminists are nowhere to be found.

    Had this been a guy falsely accusing a female campaign worker of something sexual in nature, blackmail, etc. all we’d hear about is the rampant underlying sexism in this campaign.

  51. Sean wrote:

    Renee post # 37

    What you said appears to be, sadly, correct. Hence, my qualifier “legitimate” grievances.

    Phil post # 40

    Amazingly enough, even after almost 20 years later, neither the mayor, nor the Boston Police Department, to my knowledge, has apoplogized for their handling of the Stuart case.

    The fact that Carol Stuart’s family established a scholarship in her name for inner-city students, in the spirit of healing wounds, was an immeasurably kind gesture. I can only hope that it further embarrased the mayor and police commisioner.

  52. atlasien wrote:

    “the feminists are nowhere to be found”… What? I’m sure there more than a few feminists or womanists weighing in on this very thread.

    Believing feminists have to condemn every woman who does a bad thing is just… really, really ludicrous. It’s sort of like demanding a disability rights activist condemn a random blind person who kicked a puppy. Women are potentially capable of the same nasty range of behavior men are (in this case, racism and deceit).

    I’m a feminist and I have absolutely zero interest in defending the purity of women, in fact I think that’s a poisonous idea, generally put forth by the people who put women on pedestals and then try to force them to stay there.

  53. Celeste wrote:

    It’s a sad way to think about it but I bet if a more “conventionally attractive woman (smaller, prettier, blonder)” had tried to pull off the same stunt, the Pittsburgh police wouldn’t have seen through it so quickly.

  54. Persia wrote:

    Thanks Winn and atlasien for pointing out some things I wanted to say, better than I could.

    If you haven’t managed to catch the Rachel Maddow segment on this case, I encourage you to do so (hey, a white feminist talking about the racial aspects of this!). It was nice to see cable television putting someone as smart and savvy as Melissa Harris-Lacewell on.

  55. Black Canseco wrote:

    @ atl,
    Believing feminists have to condemn every woman who does a bad thing is just… really, really ludicrous.

    I disagree. still.

    the movement that passes for feminism continues to attempt to hold so many accountable for the actions of individuals (every man has to defend/condemn every male’s actions), ethnic groups must do the same, etc.

    Yet as this campaign has reminded me time and time again, the asinine actions of individual white women are never ever challenged as anything more than the acts of specific individuals.

    we should all be so fortunate.

    you can best believe that if a male had accused a female of any absurd behavior or said something out of line, we’d get 15 posts on everyblog about sexism run amok.

    but no. Ashley Todd gets the “mental illness” defense. When Hillary Clinton made outrageous comments she got the “tough politics” defense. Gloria Steinem got the “out of touch” defense. Michelle Bachmann gets the “stupid” defense. Sarah Palin’s “just a crazy conservative”, etc..

    they’re all very nice ways of saying, “white women don’t normally behave this way/say these things, so something unusual must be going on.”

    and in come the excuses from that point on.

    it’s a level of hyper humanity that afford white women and white men at the expense of others and it always comes with demanding that other groups be accountable for every single individual with said group as if they’re little more than homogenious pod people.

    and in the case of white women who’ve put themselves in charge of feminism, the result is inexusable behavior such as this combined with the hypocritical outrage laid at the foot of others.

    but defend that if you will. i’m not tied to feminism like that.

  56. Reiter wrote:

    Who knew Obama hired would-be Zorros to carve his initials into hapless women’s faces?

    Unbelievable. That’s the only word to describe the antics being pulled by the McCain campaign. Desperation makes people do crazy things.

  57. livininphilly wrote:

    oooo… so much good conversation about this open thread. Allow me to put in my 2 cents. @ Celetes # 53, i’m surprised no one else has bought this aspect up yet as well. Although we may never know what difference it would’ve made we can definitely conjecture from case like the Susan Smith case how it would’ve played out if someone who looked like your description had presented this story.

    I know it’s already been said but I will cosign that mental health is a very serious problem, in all communities. One of the biggest barriers to access to care is the belief that ppl will not be taken seriously. Many ppl don’t seek help until a crisis b/c of their own beliefs that mental illness is “not real.” It’s slightly insulting to read the term mental illness in quotes, especially b/c I have batteled it myself. I can vouch that my experiences were very, very real and painful. As well as the assertions that have appeared on this thread that ppl use their diagnoses as a “crutch.” That is exactly the type of thinking that alienates ppl and causes them to not seek the help that they need.
    People do all sorts of things when they are battling mental health problems including self-medicating with drugs and alcohol, committing crimes, and in some cases falsifying info to get attention. I am not working with this woman so I have no idea what her deal is but to me this whole case screams some sort of mental unbalance. As someone who works in the medical field as a case manager I constantly deal with clients who have a mental health diagnosis (or need one) who make up information. One thing that my supervisor told me that always stuck with me is “someone who is actively in their addiction(to drugs or alcohol) will 8x out of 10 flip the story to present themselves in a better light.” This is something that has been proven to me time and again when I catch a client in a lie. Perhaps that is what is happening with this young woman.

    In fact couldn’t racism be catagorised as a national mental health epidemic? All of the -isms that we fight against can be categorized as sociopathic behavior when used to terrorize and marginalize groups of people. When a man uses his privelege to silence a woman’s voice that is sociopathic behavior. When a racist sets up a system to benefit someone based on their skin color that is sociopathic behavior. When a classist uses thier class to disallow access that is sociopathic behavior. This woman used her privelege as a woman and as a white person to falsify a crime, that is sociopathic behavior.

    However, I will say that mental illness doesn’t ever give someone a right to behave badly. This woman behaved badly and she should be prosecuted b/c of the enormity of her lies. On the same token her mental health status, while it should be used to inform this case, shouldn’t be belittled. The tone of some comments comes across as condescending & offensive and that isn’t what this website is about.

  58. Ron wrote:

    I have had my experience with those with mental disorders. I am just happy no one was wrongfully accused because of inferior investigative work.

    I want to share a story with you all. I remember being a teenager enjoying myself at a mall in the San Fernando Valley. While sitting down across from an electronics store I decided to watch a bit of a boxing match between two African-Americans. After watching a round or two, I became disturbed because one boxer was clearly superior than the other and was destroying his opponent. A white lady came and sat next to me and yelled, “I hope those niggers kill each other.” Somewhat shocked I replied,”Why?” The lady said to me, “nigger I will kill you.” I laughed nervously and said, “I do not think so.”

    I was a bit nervous but more pertubed by her audacity. The lady was over 6 feet and about 190. I was a shrimp back then only about 5′8″ and 145. So I decided to get up and leave. As I was walking away she headed toward me full steam as if on the attack. I just slid out of her way because she did not seem very agile. I tried to avoid a confrontation by moving out of her way but she continued come after me like a madwoman.

    The security came and of course handcuffed me and took her story that I had attacked her. I was taken to the security office to be processed. As I sat and waited for the LAPD and explained to my mother that I was just minding my business, I thought can a brother get a break.

    Let alone my buddies were laughing the whole time before I was handcuffed.

    Fortunately, they let me go because they found out that the lady was a mental patient and confessed that she had made it all up.

    The officers even joked with me that the lady wanted to invite me to dinner.

    My 12 year old daughter compared this incident, “To Kill a Mocking Bird.”

  59. Will wrote:

    @livininphilly

    Good points about mental health, but things neither happen in a vacuum nor happen without consequences. This woman seized upon one of the most tried and true stereotypes and people were willing to use this incident to bash the Obama campaign and black men at large. Despite her mental issues, thats still despicable. But I’m biased, because people like her make me ever so less safe.

    I mean, I think it was some big shot at Fox news who said that this incident “should make people take a step back and look closer at Obama”. Why? because the actions of a deranged mugger (fictitious) tells us something about an accomplished man running for president because they share the same skin color?

    @Ron, I feel your pain. Your story ended well but there have been a few that didn’t end so well. I haven’t had an incident quite like yours, but its always on my mind. I am at fault by default.

    So while I don’t think that materially it should have made a difference whether the attack was real or not, I breathed a huge sigh of relief when it turned out to be a hoax. I’m also glad that law enforcement handled this properly. I arrived in Boston just after the Charles Stuart thing happened, and to put it mildly that did not go well.

  60. space wrote:

    I’m a white feminist and lurker on several race and gender blogs who’s been thinking about Black Canseco’s complaint.

    A common criticism I see of white feminists is that we tend to ignore race and racism and how race affects sex/gender relations. So maybe the challenge presented here is not for us to “condemn every woman who does a bad thing,” but to be as willing to call out racism as we are to call out sexism, and to explore the relationship between “benevolent” sexism and racism. That is indeed a valid challenge.

    I, for one, think all the women he mentioned were just plain being racist jerks. No excuses. And this particular case drives home the points Renee of “Womanist Musings” (a black feminist) had made about how “benevolent sexism” toward White women was invented to encourage White women to be allies to White men in oppressing Black people. So it’s really not so “benevolent” after all, and white women should oppose it as fiercely as “make me a sandwich you C**t” sexism.

  61. Kanika wrote:

    I doubt that Ms. Todd is mentally ill…She’s an attention junkie that knew exactly what she was doing, but didn’t do it very well.

  62. NancyP wrote:

    black canseco, perhaps the occasional white feminist vented elsewhere. I stopped by a few blogs with Todd posts, and used up my choicest phrases early, probably at Pam’s House Blend.

    All who pointed out that mental illness shouldn’t be used as an excuse for malicious behavior – thank you, on behalf of all who have had clinically major mental illness. Most mentally ill people do make an effort to avoid hurting other people.

  63. StarInaPaperCup wrote:

    @BlackCanseco

    Reading your posts, I get the feeling that you’re -unintentionally, perhaps- masking sexist complaints about women in general as progressive critiques of white women in particular. There are feminists of all colors examining the issue in this very thread and elsewhere; and there are two feminists of color (atlasien and me) who are disagree with what you’re saying.

  64. Persephone wrote:

    @space –

    I agree that the sexual/gender implication of this case is far from “benevolent.” I recently read Frantz Fanon’s Black Skin, White Masks, and he talks about how this kind of racist mythology (the big black rapist story) hurts both black people and women, because women’s body’s are being treated as territory to be defended by white men, and as perpetually being in danger of rape even in circumstances (say, in front of a camera-equipped ATM) where it is highly unlikely that an actual rape would happen.

    I’m pissed that Todd and anyone who collaborated with or encouraged her in this would deliberately spread these pernicious stereotypes of black men. And as a white woman, I’m also pissed that my sexuality is once again being used as a political prop for a discourse that I don’t want any part of.