Casting Out: Exploring the Racialization of Muslims

by Special Correspondent Fatemeh Fakhraie

I just finished reading Sherene H. Razack’s Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law & Politics (2008). And I gotta say, it blew me onto my ass.

Razack is the author of several books, including Looking White People in the Eye: Gender, Race, and Culture in Courtrooms and Classrooms, and her work in race theory definitely shows in Casting Out. She uses plenty of theory and excellent cross-racial examples to illustrate that what’s currently happening to Muslims in the West (racialization that results in “the expulsion of Muslims from the political community, a process that takes the form of stigmatization, surveillance, incarceration, torture, and bombing”) has happened to other groups before.

She first argues that Muslims are racialized through “race thinking”, which “divides up the world between the deserving and the undeserving, according to descent.” The racialization of Islam and Muslims is something the editors and I have been wanting to address on Racialicious for awhile, but I haven’t quite known how to begin; Razack’s book provides the perfect springboard.

Islam is represented in mainstream media as South/West Asian brown-skinned people who are bearded and turbaned or veiled and hidden: this racializes Islam.

Now, before you start typing a response that there are non-West Asian Muslims and that Muslim isn’t a race, re-read what I just wrote. There are Muslims in every country in the world, and they are all colors and sizes. But Western media representation of Islam and Muslims simplifies this world-wide group of people into one picture: that of a brown guy with a beard and a keffiyeh. His female counterpart is a brown woman with a veil. Reducing an entire group of people to these static images that have to context or history creates flat attributes (such as the incorrect assertion that West Asia = Muslim) that can be applied to anyone deemed in the “Muslim” category.

Razack argues “the eviction of Muslims from [the Western] political community is a racial process that begins with Muslims being marked as a different level of humanity and being assigned a separate and unequal place in the law.” (her emphasis) When Islam is racialized, the presentation of terrorism as Islamic thus racializes terrorism, especially when terrorism is illustrated by brown-skinned bearded South/West Asians. So, if terrorism is equated with Muslims, then we come to “widespread condemnation of bodies marked as ‘Muslim,’ and heightened support for punitive measures against them.”

Her book also examines three figures: the dangerous Muslim man, the imperiled Muslim woman, and the civilized European. She maps out the racialization and “race thinking” of and around these figures, and traces their roles in things such as the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib, racial profiling, Western feminism’s call for improving the lives of Muslim women in North Africa and South/West Asia*, and fears of Sharia law taking over Western politics.

This is where Razack defragments the “culture clash” duality.

“The close connections between assertions of cultural difference and racism has meant that in white societies the smallest references to cultural differences between the European majority and the Third World peoples (Muslims in particular) triggers an instant chain of associations (the veil, female genital mutilation, arranged marriages) that ends with the declared superiority of European culture, imagined as a homogenous composite of values… Culture clash, where the West has values and modernity and the non-West has culture…”

The culture clash argument uses the flat, racialized images of Muslims and puts them in inherent opposition to the West, as if all Muslims everywhere are this one way and the only possible explanation for their being “this way” is because they are Muslims and that’s “their culture.” Razack sums this up nicely: “Cultural difference, understood as their cannibalism, their treatment of women, and their homophobia, justifies the savagery that the West metes out.”

(her emphases)

She then connects the culture clash to the expulsion of Muslims from Western law:

“The state’s central conceptual tool in suspending the rights of those suspected of involvement in terrorism or considered to have the potential to be terrorists has been the idea that Islam breeds a particular pre-modern subject, one who possesses a violent hatred of the West and who is not committed to the rule of law, respect for human rights and women’s rights, or democracy.”

And then she connects this expulsion to neo-colonialism and/or Western imperialism:

“The West is understood as culturally committed to the values of the Enlightenment, while the non-West remains incompletely modern at best, or hostile to modernity at worst. Within this conceptual framework, one often described as a clash of civilizations, it is the duty of modern peoples to bring pre-modern peoples in line.”

She draws great historical parallels between camp mentality in other times and what’s going on now, giving excellent analysis on how Southern plantations, Japanese internment camps, the Spanish Inquisition, etc., were earlier forms of the “race thinking” that is being enacted now in Iraq, Guantanamo Bay, and the suspension of civil liberties of Muslims and South/West Asians in Western countries. Not only are her parallels apt, but they’re very educational: in her comparison between Guantanamo Bay and Auschwitz, the Soviet gulags, refugee camps, etc., I learned the Guantanamo Bay had previously been used as a “holding center” for Haitians deemed an HIV threat under President Clinton. In her analysis of Abu Ghraib, she compared what happened there to Canadian peacekeeper violence against Somalians just a decade earlier—something I didn’t know about, either.

I had a difficulty with her focus on “Arabs and Muslims,” which I think is a bit reductive, given the heightened media attention on Iran and Pakistan, two non-Arab but predominately Muslim countries. Though I agree that Islam and Muslims have been racialized into being “brown” and perhaps even “Arab,” I still think it would be more beneficial to the argument if Razack had clarified that she was focusing on the treatment of North African and South/West Asian Muslims. Though she posits that all Muslims are racialized, I get caught up in her use of “Muslims” because most of her examples deal with North African and South/West Asian Muslims.

Also, the inclusion of John Walker Lindh and Jose Padilla in her argument about the racialization of Islam and terrorism would be an interesting one; they have been convicted as terrorists, but neither are North African or South/West Asian. Both are American citizens. Lindh is white and Muslim; he was treated just as badly as North African and South/West Asian detainees because he is Muslim. Padilla is Latino and Muslim. He was detained and his habeaus corpus was suspended just like North African and South/West Asian Muslim detainees. They are presented has having their American citizenship and ethnicities taken over by “brown” Islam, which Razack notes is often compared to disease with panicked media allegations that Islam is “spreading.”

This book, though only 180 actual pages, is a wealth of colonial and race theory. It’s dense, and written a bit academically, but worth any struggle. This book taught me more about colonialism, race thinking, and Orientalism than three university courses on Muslims (specifically, Muslim women, but still), and it’s the first book that’s really galvanized my viewpoints in a long time.

*I am deliberately using the cumbersome but geographically accurate term North Africa and South/West Asia instead of “Middle East,” which is a colonial term because it locates this geographic terrain in respect to the West.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Racialicious: Casting Out: Exploring the Racialization of Muslims « Stop Dog Whistle Racism! on 02 Oct 2008 at 12:18 pm

    […] Casting Out: Exploring the Racialization of Muslims I just finished reading Sherene H. Razack’s Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law & Politics (2008). And I gotta say, it blew me onto my ass.Razack is the author of several books, including Looking White People in the Eye: Gender, Race, and Culture in Courtrooms and Classrooms, and her work in race theory definitely shows in Casting Out. She uses plenty of theory and excellent cross-racial examples to illustrate that what’s currently happening to Muslims in the West (racialization that results in “the expulsion of Muslims from the political community, a process that takes the form of stigmatization, surveillance, incarceration, torture, and bombing”) has happened to other groups before. […]

  2. Casting Out: Exploring the Racialization of Muslims » Islam on My Side on 03 Oct 2008 at 8:38 pm

    […] The following is a brilliant article by Fatemeh Fakhraie.  She reviews Sherene H. Razack’s latest book, Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law & Politics (2008), which discusses how the racialization of Islam (and Muslims) subsequently evicts them from Western politics and law. Fatemeh is the Editor-in-Chief for Muslimah Media Watch. This article first appeared on Racialicious. […]

  3. The Invisible Muslimah « Muslimah Media Watch on 08 Oct 2008 at 2:05 am

    […] victims and otherized. The face of this woman is usually brown. Fatemeh has a great post about the racialization of Islam up at Racialicious. I think that this racialization of Islam leaves little space for the […]

  4. The Invisible Muslimah « Muslimnista on 08 Oct 2008 at 11:02 am

    […] victims and otherized. The face of this woman is usually brown. Fatemeh has a great post about the racialization of Islam up at Racialicious. I think that this racialization of Islam leaves little space for the […]

  5. The Invisible Muslimah at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 16 Oct 2008 at 10:08 am

    […] victims and otherized. The face of this woman is usually brown. Fatemeh has a great post about the racialization of Islam up at Racialicious. I think that this racialization of Islam leaves little space for the […]

  6. Stand Up WITH Muslim Women, Johann « Muslimah Media Watch on 28 Oct 2008 at 2:04 am

    […] Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law and Politics (read Fatemeh’s review here) just does not exist in Bangladesh it would seem. Or in any other Muslim country for that matter, […]

  7. Stand Up WITH Muslim Women, Johann « Muslimnista on 28 Oct 2008 at 8:19 am

    […] Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law and Politics (read Fatemeh’s review here) just does not exist in Bangladesh it would seem. Or in any other Muslim country for that matter, […]

Comments

  1. Vidya wrote:

    I haven’t read her latest book, but I’ve studied with Sherene. Her work is consistantly awesome (so are her classes).

  2. Rchoudh wrote:

    Great book review! I’d like to get ahold of that book someday. It’s certainly true that Islam has been racialized to mean that only “brown-skinned” folks are Muslim. You see that with Western MSM’s images of Muslims and with how brown-skinned folks are always detained for “further security clearance” at airports. Making Muslims out to be brown-skinned has also meant that alot of non-Muslims, mostly from the Indian subcontinent, have also experienced alot of the same racism and scrutiny dealt towards Muslims. Unfortunately this image of Islam and Muslims will be very hard to shake because the media likes to keep things simple and for it to go into the Muslim community’s diversity will be too much work for them to cover!

  3. DEAF FEMINIST PUNK!! wrote:

    Now, before you start typing a response that there are non-West Asian Muslims and that Muslim isn’t a race, re-read what I just wrote. There are Muslims in every country in the world, and they are all colors and sizes. But Western media representation of Islam and Muslims simplifies this world-wide group of people into one picture: that of a brown guy with a beard and a keffiyeh. His female counterpart is a brown woman with a veil. Reducing an entire group of people to these static images that have to context or history creates flat attributes (such as the incorrect assertion that West Asia = Muslim) that can be applied to anyone deemed in the “Muslim” category.

    YES, YES, YES.

    People are often shocked when they find out I am a Muslim born into a Muslim family. Sometimes people ask me if I’m Hindu because they can’t believe that I’m actually a MUSLIM who doesn’t wear a hijab or doesn’t love Osama!!! *sarcasm*

    People are often shocked to learn that there are white Muslims who were actually BORN Muslim, such as Bosnians and Albanians. Oh, and imagine their shock at white-skinned Arab Muslims who can easily pass as European!!!

    Orrrr, *gasp* FUCK!!! there are LIBERAL MUSLIMS who drink beer, have sex, hang out with Jews, and support gay rights… oh my god?!?!

    God, people’s ignorance and stupidity never cease to anger me. I fucking hate this stupid world. Get me off Earth and transport me to to another galaxy, aliens!!!!

  4. gatamala wrote:

    the West has values and modernity and the non-West has culture

    It’s as if one develops values, evolves and becomes modern, but culture is something innate, immutable, peculiar or otherwise something to overcome. An othering technique. As people on this blog have been told, “I don’t feel that my people have a culture”. It happens in reverse too, “Americans don’t really have a culture”.

    They are presented has having their American citizenship and ethnicities taken over by “brown” Islam, which Razack notes is often compared to disease with panicked media allegations that Islam is “spreading.”

    YES!!! It is as if they, Padilla in particular, don’t “count” as Americans. Lindh came first and as a white guy with a new accent was more of an oddity (ala look what THEY can do and how could he do THAT to us/his people). I haven’t seen but one picture of Padilla (gang era mugshot). I guess as a POC he never “counted” at all as his “loyalty” was already in question.

    People are often shocked to learn that there are white Muslims who were actually BORN Muslim, such as Bosnians and Albanians. Oh, and imagine their shock at white-skinned Arab Muslims who can easily pass as European!!!

    I’ve noted gradations of sympathy for Muslims and those perceived as Muslims based on their skin tone.

    Consider the reactions to Srebrenica & Kosovo or Russia & the Caucasus (Chechen beards shut down any consideration of Russian genocide). Consider the treatment of 9/11 bodies to [most] 2004 tsunami bodies (brown religion notwithstanding).

  5. Tariq Nelson wrote:

    I think that it is a particular look that has been racialized. For men it is a long beard in addition to a head gear (turban, kifayyah, Afghan cap, etc) and a traditional thobe or Pakistani-style long shirt with baggy pants. For women, it is the head scarf, niqaab or burka, etc. Once a white person adopts this look, they are no longer seen as white.

    I think it may be a little different for Middle Eastern and SE Asian men even if they adopt a Western-style dress. They often can not escape the scrutiny.

    I think people are slowly learning that Muslims come in all forms. I don’t “look like a Muslim” (whatever that means) but I am. Others can “look like a Muslim” but are not.

  6. Jess wrote:

    gatamala –
    right on with Bosnia. One of the interesting dynamics there was that in other parts of the world many saw it as a Muslim equivalent of the Spanish civil war, which is why a few people went to fight there (though only a small number).

    Also, people forget that Albania is 70% Muslim, and has the distinction of being the only communist country with a Muslim majority. (I don’t count Syria or Iraq since the old communist label doesn’t really fit either place and never really has). But a few mosques were still operating even with giant statues of Stalin still standing and people drank stuff that is most definitely alcohol. It’s interesting that nobody even considers Albania as a Muslim country when they talk about it.

  7. Jamerican Muslimah wrote:

    As a brown-skinned Black woman who wears the headscarf, I find that people are shocked that I am not “from over there” (if they don’t assume my country of origin automatically.) Just as White American Muslims (esp. women who wear the headscarf) suddenly find themselves part of a racialized group, I find myself associated with immigrant groups from “over there.” (And ‘over there’ can mean any country in the mind of the observer).

    In some respects I feel like I am “reracialized.”

  8. ceecee wrote:

    It’s pretty sad what is happening. I have close friends who are muslims and it makes me sad to witness what is happening.
    Even indians/pakistanis get profiled!

  9. Rchoudh wrote:

    It’s sometimes funny to see how shocked people often become whenever they come across Muslims who look white. First they’ll question whether the individual has European ancestry; if the Muslim is a woman they may wonder whether she dyed her hair and is wearing contacts. Finally if it’s a Muslim in the West they’ll wonder if he/she is a convert because they can’t fathom the idea of a white person being a born Muslim.
    And people can often subconsciously hold awful misperceptions about others based on skin tone. In a media studies course once students were asked to view an image of two fully covered Muslim women at a rally in London and discuss about how they felt about the image. Both women had their faces covered so only their eyes could be seen. One woman was light skinned and blue-eyed and the other was brown-skinned and dark-eyed. What was disturbing was the number of times people claimed that they felt more uncomfortable seeing the dark eyed woman because she seemed to be more menacing of the two; people felt like she was “plotting” something just based on the way she looked to them. With the blue eyed woman people felt that she had reluctantly resigned herself towards listening to whatever her friend was “plotting”. And as usual alot of students assumed the blue eyed woman was a convert but then others rightfully told them not to assume that because it could be that the woman was a born Muslim from Afghanistan for example.

  10. Dawud wrote:

    This all goes back to “Whiteness” in America; and this is the majority difference between Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.

    Whereas Jewish people have become accepted into American “Whiteness”, Islam and melanin to a lesser degree in my opinion blocks Muslims from having “Whiteness” which is the standard for “Americaness”.

    I’m not suggesting that we want to enter into “Whiteness”, but this is what’s up.

    Even Bosnians who have blue eyes and pale skin may be labeled as White on the census, but they cannot be “White” if they are Muslim.

    Akbar Ahmed is doing a documentary called “Journey into America” where this was found with Bosnian Muslims in St Louis.
    SEE: http://journeyintoamerica.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/bosnians-in-st-louis-right-skin-color-wrong-religion/

    In Europe, this is a similar fate that the Turks face in being excluded from the European Union and the hell that Turkish immigrants catch in Germany. White skin but not “European”.

  11. Rchoudh wrote:

    @ Dawud

    I cosign everything you said. White privilege does not extend very far for whites who identify as Muslim. But I do think they have it a little easier than the more stereotypical looking brown Muslim. Only when the government starts occaisionally scaring citizens with the “white al-Quaida” threat does the (very limited) white privilege usually given get revoked for white Muslims.

  12. jvansteppes wrote:

    Sherene Razack is AMAZING and I can’t wait to read this book. I have to agree that reading one of her books is akin to taking 3 classes.

  13. Jess wrote:

    Dawud and Rchoudh made me think of something else: when I lived in Europe people complained about Albanians and Bosnians, but the Muslim aspect was never even mentioned — it was because they were poor immigrants (this is in England).

    That was less true of people form the Arab world, for instance, or Algeria.

  14. fathima wrote:

    this book looks great. i’ve read a few essays here and there by Razack and i’ve had the pleasure of hearing her speak too, but i think i’ll make this the first book of hers that i read.
    slightly on a tangent — but what i appreciate most about Razack is that she isn’t your standard disconnected academic. the theory she writes is also one she practises in her activist work.

  15. krista wrote:

    Great review, Fatemeh!

    In terms of the Muslimness vs. whiteness discussion, I think it’s a bit more complex than just saying that “White privilege does not extend very far for whites who identify as Muslim” (as Rchoud did.) Certainly, being Muslim complicates the idea of white privilege. But I would put two qualifications on that:

    1. There’s a wide spectrum of whether white Muslims still get read as white (I’m talking here about people who come from the European Judeo-Christian backgrounds that typically get associated with whiteness, not, for example, light-skinned Arabs, who may already be considered - or identify as - non-white because of their names and ethnic origins, among other things.) For example, a white person who is Muslim, has an Arabic-sounding name, and wears clothing commonly associated with Islam (hijab, thobe, whatever) will likely be seen as other than white, and may not experience any manifestations of white privilege in their interactions with others. On the other hand, someone who identifies as Muslim but has an English-sounding (or otherwise European-sounding) name and does not wear hijab or other clothing that explicitly identifies them as Muslim will likely be assumed to be non-Muslim in most of their interactions, unless they state otherwise. While people in this second group may still feel the effects of Islamophobia in many ways, they may simultaneously continue to benefit from white privilege in many aspects of their lives.

    2. Even for people in the first group (white people who dress in ways that identify them as Muslim, and are therefore read as non-white by many people), I would argue that those among them who grew up non-Muslim in North America or Europe and came to Islam later in life still benefit from white privilege. These people would most likely have grown up in a context where they saw themselves reflected on TV and in other areas of popular culture, their people’s history prioritised in their school curriculum, their citizenship and belonging in their culture and country was never questioned, and so on. I think it’s still a pretty powerful privilege to come from such a background and to grow up as a member of a dominant group, even for someone who is no longer assumed by others to be white.

    As a white Muslim woman who doesn’t normally wear hijab, I definitely experience different reactions (and different assumptions about where I’m from) as soon as I put on a headscarf. Even among Muslims, people will sometimes use “white people” interchangeably with “non-Muslims.” Islam is definitely something that is understood in racialised terms, and as it sounds like Sherene Razack does a good job of arguing in her book, that’s definitely not a coincidence.

  16. razib wrote:

    It’s interesting that nobody even considers Albania as a Muslim country when they talk about it.

    1) most people are retarded and ignorant, worldwide. so they probably don’t know where albania is, or anything about albanians (aside from what they “learned” in borat :-)

    2) albanians are from what i have read more secular as muslims than french are as catholics. that is, more french catholics practice catholicism in an orthopraxic manner that other catholics would recognize as orthopraxic than is the case with albanians. the fact that a large minority of albanian muslims are from bektashi backgrounds probably ultimately contributes to this.

  17. Pheagan wrote:

    Good post; I’ll definitely look into this book. I’m a philosophy major and I’ve been really disturbed by this process, which I couldn’t really put a name on, until now. As a philosophy major I’ve always been aware of the importance of Islamic society to philosophy; the works of the Greeks were preserved by muslim scholarship; Al Ghazali, Avicenna and Averroes were instrumental to Modern Western Philosophy (which is Enlightenment-era)– interestingly, Descartes ideas about God were largely formed by those philosophers and also Maimonedes, who was Jewish. So basically what I’m saying is I’ve always viewed Islam as integral to the Western identity, and I was very disturbed to see them being ostracized from the Western identity when they’d played such a huge role in defining it.

    Furthermore I’ve just come back from a long period working in Cambodia, where there’s a good population of Cham people, and that introduced me to the wildly different forms Islam takes.

    On another note, ths racialization also seems to effect Muslims and force them into a role they didn’t origianally inhabit– take the Regle de L’Echarpe laws in France, where scarfs were banned in state buildings, including schools, due to their supposedly religious affiliations. From what I understand, most of the muslim population in France in fact didn’t wear scarfs, since they were from Maghrebin areas, but many donned them in solidarity to other muslims in the face of this persecution. So in a way that image is being created by white Western antagonism against this image.

  18. Rchoudh wrote:

    @krista

    I see what you’re saying about white Muslims and privilege. So whatever privilege is doled out is given most to those who hide their faith through their whiteness, names, and through not visibly practicing it. With white practicing Muslims the privilege is given out less but some is nonetheless there, like what you said about white converts.
    I would like to add that this racialization of Islam conveniently serves to “other” and dehumanize the enemy (terrorists, insurgents, etc) so that when it comes time to kill them (and civilians occaisionally) the guilt would be lessened because after all the enemy is not really human with “European” values (civilized, enlightened, modern).

  19. Fatemeh wrote:

    Thanks for your comments, everybody.

    I think Krista brings up some great issues about whiteness and Rchoudh bring up interesting points.

  20. Jess wrote:

    @razib–

    Right on. Yes, a lot of people are ignorant about Albania, which to be fair was pretty isolated. Think of this: if you are old enough to have a pre-1994 US passport you can remember a time when the fine print inside had a long list of countries you were NOT allowed to travel to, and Albania was one. That was the case for 40 years at least.

    Thanks for the scrabble word: orthopraxis! :-)

    But more seriously yes, Albanians tend to be more secular, at least until the KLA started churning out their propaganda. But even the KLA is more secular, and it is far from clear that the more religious factions are going to get anywhere politically. A lot of more religious groups have tried to make inroads, but to my knowledge they are tiny haven’t made much headway.

  21. Sobia wrote:

    Great review Fatemeh. And I agree with most of the comments here.

    @ Rchoudh:

    “So whatever privilege is doled out is given most to those who hide their faith through their whiteness, names, and through not visibly practicing it. With white practicing Muslims the privilege is given out less but some is nonetheless there, like what you said about white converts.”

    I didn’t read Krista’s point as “practicing vs. non-practicing Muslim” but rather as “obvious vs non-obvious Muslim.” Just for the record there is a difference between the two. And I don’t see not being “obviously” Muslim as hiding one’s faith, because hiding to me implies activity - that one actively does not tell others what their faith is.

    And this leads into my point. Even in the Muslim world, though to a lesser extent, there is often shock at diversity.

    On Muslimah Media Watch we just had a discussion of the idea of race in the Muslim community and how racialized Islamic-ness or religiosity is within our community. Certain ethnic groups are seen as better Muslims and others as less. Thus this can lead to shock or surprise when the stereotypes are not supported.

    So although the non-Muslim world does racialize Muslims, we unfortunately do it too. Its just that the manifestation and consequences are different.

    By the way, I’ve had Muslims assume I was Sikh - I look Punjabi (supposedly - though it makes sense since I am Punjabi) and I don’t wear hijab or anything that would make me “obviously” Muslim.

  22. krista wrote:

    @ Rchoudh:

    I just want to clarify something; I agree with what you have said, but I’m not comfortable with your wording about “those who hide their faith.” I would agree that a person’s faith *gets* hidden when their name and appearance mark them as white, but your wording (which may have been unintentional) suggests that they do this actively or on purpose, which isn’t necessarily the case. Moreover, “visibly practising” is tricky to define, unless you’re talking about wearing hijab or something, which is only one part of Islamic practice (and isn’t a discussion we should get into here.) So someone can be a very religious and practising Muslim, who is doing nothing to actively hide their faith, but is still assumed to be non-Muslim (and therefore experiences white privilege) because there is such an entrenched idea of “white” and “Muslim” being mutually-exclusive categories.

    And I totally agree about the intention being to mark Muslims as “other” and less “human” and “civilised” than non-Muslim white North Americans/Europeans.

  23. Rchoudh wrote:

    @ Krista and Sobia

    Sorry I didn’t word myself properly. I didn’t mean to imply that someone who wasn’t a visibly practicing Muslim was intentionally hiding their faith. I personally know of many Muslims who don’t show any visible signs of being Muslim (hijab, beard) but who are good Muslims nonetheless. I was just trying to say that unless a person is asked specifically what his/her religion is most people who see a Muslim not visibly showing any signs of Muslimness (hijab, beard) and who has an uncommon Muslim name and looks white (or black, Asian,etc.) would never know that that person was Muslim. I wasn’t trying to imply that a non-visible Muslim always tries to intentionally hide their faith; the only exception to this would be someone who lies in order to cover up their Muslim identity. I hope I made myself clearer now.

  24. krista wrote:

    @ Rchoudh: Thanks. I assumed that’s what you meant, but I appreciate the clarification.

  25. gatamala wrote:

    So basically what I’m saying is I’ve always viewed Islam as integral to the Western identity, and I was very disturbed to see them being ostracized from the Western identity when they’d played such a huge role in defining it.

    THANK YOU for this point!!! Muslims saved secular and religious literature from being burned from the time of the fights over the nature of Jesus through the Inquisition.

  26. Abu Sinan wrote:

    Interesting. I am a white Muslim who certainly doesnt “look Muslim”. I’m a better fit for a Waffen SS recruiting poster than what most Americans think of as a Muslim.

    To white privledge and the white Muslim, I still think we get a pass. See, we can come and go with our religion, the same cannot be said of race. Some have said that whites who convert to Islam “apostate from their race” but this can only be true to a certain extent.

    It just isnt Americans or non Muslims that make generalisations and assumptions about race. I have had many “born” Muslims assume that I must be from a Middle Eastern background because I am Muslim, it doesnt enter their head that a white guy would convert to Islam. To these Muslims, other Muslims are PoC, or people of white skin from Muslim countries.

    These Muslims have taken this stereotype, this generalisation, for themselves and internalised it.

    I’d love to read a book that deals with race relations in the Islamic world. In my experience, racism in the Islamic world is a MAJOR problem, I have seen this in my travels in the Muslim world and even here in the DC area with my interactions with the Muslim community.

    Racism in the Arabian Gulf is endemic, it is a rooted and lodged part of the culture I witnessed first hand, all the way to the major blow up we had at my work when a Begali Muslim was accused by an African Senegalese Muslim of racism after the Bengali refused to shake his hand.

    Interesting subject all around.

    It is a HUGE issue in our own community.

  27. Dawud wrote:

    @Abu Sinan - No doubt, racism among Muslims to me is a bigger issue than racism that we receive from the dominant culture in America.

    I’m saying this, obviously, from a spiritual perspective firstly, not from a sociological vantage point.

  28. Sobia wrote:

    @Abu Sinan:

    I absolutely agree with you (I made an earlier comment about it :) )

    There is an unfortunate racial hierarchy in our community and many of us have been victimized by it.

  29. Lisa Harney wrote:

    The racialization of Islam reminds me of this post by a white Muslim woman, who describes how removing her hijab changed how people see her:

    I removed my hijab a little over a year ago.

    It was hard to get used to going without it at first. After all, I had worn it for over half my life.

    Everything changed.

    Now, I’m white. Fully white.

  30. Dawud wrote:

    I know a female blogger who is a Jewish revert to Islam that said the exact same thing.

    Those who are identified via dress and/or an Arabic or Persian name become “de-Americanized”, which means being taken out of full status of “Whiteness”.

    Unfortunately on the national level, Muslim organizations have not included this within their discourse regarding the relationship of Islamophobia with America’s version of White Supremacy. This is partly due to Muslims, who immigrated here, in seeking the “American Dream”, and that translated as being accepted by White America.

    Thus, the antithesis of this dream is “Blackness”. This is a portion of the root of tension between Blackamerican Muslims with “Immigrant Muslims”.

  31. Sobia wrote:

    @ Dawud:

    That could be it. But I think another aspect of it is that the racism that occurs in Muslim communities across North America is brought with immigrants when they move here. It is not just that White is seen as either better or as un-Muslim, but that there are prejudices toward other ethnic groups that exist in the immigrants’ home countries as well. These prejudices simply come to the forefront in places like North America because we are “forced” to associate with Muslims of other ethnicities. However, the racist beliefs, IMO, were always there. Another example would be the UAE where one can see racism toward South and South East Asians.

    btw…what did you mean when you said:

    “I’m saying this, obviously, from a spiritual perspective firstly, not from a sociological vantage point.”

  32. Fatemeh wrote:

    Dawud brings up some very interesting points, and I think that racism among Muslims is just as large of a problem as Islamophobia/racism against Muslims from non-Muslims.

    Lisa, I love her blog; thanks for linking to her. She’s got some great insights.

  33. RChoudh wrote:

    To everyone who spoke about racism within the Muslim community:

    It is very true that racism, along with sexism, nationalism, and classism among other “isms” exists within the Muslim community. Like all other human communities in the world we are dealing with these same problems too. Unfortunately because we engage in these “isms” it gives others the wrong impression of Islam condoning them, just like many around the world believe that Islam condones the most infamous “ism” always associated with it terrorism. In reality it is not our religion that is causing these problems to manifest within our communities, it is our own wrongful actions which have nothing to do with Islam. As long as we engage in these “isms” others will just blame our religion for it when it’s really just our own damn fault.

  34. beka wrote:

    The association with Islam with non-white races is pervasive not just in the Western media. A newspaper feature on Muslims locally, published earlier this year, showed one white Muslim family and the general tone was kind of “you wouldn’t think it to look at them, would you?” To be fair, I live in Singapore, which is in the midst of the Malay Archipelago and where being Muslim is very closely linked to being ethnic Malay, but it’s clear that Islam is racialised in a way that, say, Christianity or Buddhism are not.

    After all, it was only recently that the UK government had to pull an offensive recruitment ad… (The news story can be found at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1023064/Army-axes-recruitment-video-claims-Malaysians-look-like-terrorists.html, I’m sorry that I’m not sure how to link in the text itself.)

  35. Dawud wrote:

    @Sobia

    I’m saying that in the sense that I look at the flawed perception of race and ethnicity that many Muslims has is a spiritual disease that runs diametrically opposed the the clear message of racial equity in the Qur’an and the life example of the Prophet Muhammad.

    In other words, I’m saying that my perspective or viewing this issue as sociological is secondary to the spiritual. If the spiritual side was together, the sociological wouldn’t be a real issue.

    Also, I agree that some Muslims bring this crappy understanding from overseas to America. I’ve been to UAE and Saudi Arabia and seen it for myself. I’ve even had a Kuwayti called me “slave” while I was in Madinah on ziyaarat. So I feel you.

    White America just amplifies the racial constructs for the Muslim bigots.

  36. Fatemeh wrote:

    @ Rchoudh: “In reality it is not our religion that is causing these problems to manifest within our communities, it is our own wrongful actions which have nothing to do with Islam.” Agree.

    But whether we like it or not, we’re humans, too, and we participate in stupid shit like misogyny or racism or homophobia as often as other religious and/or ethnic groups do. To link these things to Islam is not fair or accurate, and it’s a symptom of Islamophobia. But to ignore it (within our community), or to push it under the rug so we “don’t look bad” is a mistake. Not airing our problems as a community because we don’t want non-Muslims to associate our problems with Islam still results in not dealing with our problems.

    The haters are gonna hate whether we deal with our problems or not; if we deal with our problems, we get the added bonus of moving forward or, God willing, perhaps even coming up with and implementing solutions.

  37. RChoudh wrote:

    @ Fatemeh

    I agree that we should do something about combatting all the “isms” out there plaguing us despite what the haters may think. I guess I wasn’t clear about that earlier…sorry. I also agree with what Dawud mentioned about combatting these isms through a spiritual Islamic perspective. Muslims know that Islam forbids followers in engaging in these isms. The only thing to do after that is to practice what we preach.

  38. Celeste wrote:

    @Fatemeh: “The haters are gonna hate whether we deal with our problems or not”
    Well put, every marginalized group would do well to approach their internal problems this way

  39. Dawud wrote:

    @Celeste

    I agree with you 100%. The problem is that when the leadership ignores of a community fails to address the matter in comprehensive matter. Some within it don’t know how, some don’t care, and same choose to ignore because they benefit through the positions to only focus on the external.

  40. KittyCat wrote:

    Hi Fateheh - what a great post :) I come from Malaysia, where Islam tends to be “over-raciliased”.

    Reading the comments here, I’m so encouraged by the active and engaging dialogue. Boy, do I think it’s time I shared your post here with my countryfolk.

    I’m currently living in China where I also meet the Xinjiang and Tsinghai ethnic groups who are Muslim on a daily basis. Thought of doing a post on the Eid when I got your article in my email.

    I will definitely be back to copy and link (if I may) what you’ve written on my blogs. Please let me know if it’s ok?

  41. Fatemeh wrote:

    KittyCat, feel free.

  42. KittyCat wrote:

    Earlier this year, I read a book about a young Palestinian girl who decides to wear the hijab as she enters Year 12 in an Australian high school.

    In case anyone’s interested in this young adult novel, my review is at: http://rightreads.com/2008/03/23/does-my-head-look-big-in-this-by-randa-abdel-fattah/

  43. samira shaddad wrote:

    hi i find it very interesting that there are many views to (islamophobia) i am currently writing a dissertation on the subject and this article has given me a very different angle to look at must get the book

  44. amira wrote:

    speaking from the UK i find it very disturbing that young muslims have become the new target of racism in this country. I know America has had this thing about muslims and Arabs for years and as we have seen through history in any kind of hollywood action movie , where there’s an arab theres a hijacker or a terrorist. however, islamophobia is on the increase and its not a colour thing anymore wher the blacks were the victims of the insane its now the religion because yes muslims are in every culture and every colour what do we do about that.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.