muslims - they’re just like us!: representations of islam in traitor

by Special Correspondent Thea Lim

traitor

(spoilers inside) *

Contrary to the buzz, (and much to my dismay) Traitor is not a Bourne-esque spy thriller. My movie-watching companion (MWC) and I realised we’d been tricked into the theatre by some loose Bourne comparisons as soon as the opening credits came up. The camera pulled back to reveal a Zellige-like design and the strains of dramatic Middle Eastern music.

Generally my MWC and I avoid films that deal in war, terrorism or the suggestion that all brown people are inhuman fanatics. It looked like we were in for all three.

But the positive (and surprising) thing about Traitor - which begins with arms dealer Samir (Don Cheadle) meeting terrorist group al-Nathir in a Yemeni prison and joining their ranks - is that it goes out of its way to present Muslims as a massive, ethnically, culturally, nationally and linguistically complex group. To a lesser degree it does the same for Black folks in America.

We get to see a lot of different kinds of Muslims: Samir, who is Sudanese but effectively Americanised down to the hoodie and Don Cheadle accent; dreamy Omar (Saïd Taghmaoui) who was educated in Switzerland and longs for another thinker - not just a soldier - to join his ranks; evil Fareed (Aly Khan) who is South Asian and wears fancy scarves.

And then we meet even more Muslims across America [and Canada: Samir visits Toronto (wut wut!), Port Hope and Halifax**] when al-Nathir enlists Samir to distribute bombs to Muslim suicide bombers living on student visas, and leading ho-hum lives until they are activated.*** We meet Muslim terrorists who are living as students, business people, honest-to-goodness rural dads - and get this: they look just like regular Americans (gasp!).

Maybe you see the problem here. What is positive about Traitor is also what is negative: while the film possibly intended to show how complex the global Muslim community is, out of the dozens of Muslims portrayed in the film, you only meet three who are not terrorists. The message you take away from the movie is this: Muslim terrorists can come in any shape or form, so…

WATCH OUT! That mild-mannered Muslim executive who lives next door to you is probably…hiding a bomb in his juice box!! Come to think of it, my roommate is Muslim. And one of her best friends just moved to Toronto from Palestine…on a student visa!!!!!!!!!! Quick, I have to go ransack their belongings for semtex!!!!

Sigh.

But the most irritating thing about Traitor is its Western saviour complex [personified by FBI agent Roy Clayton (Guy Pearce)]; its anxious attempts to rescue those poor Muslims from movie stereotypes.

Just as Traitor tries to draw a line between itself and those other ignorant, racist movies, Clayton spends most of the movie drawing a line between himself and those other ignorant, racist white people. He talks about how his family used to go around putting out flaming KKK crosses. He scolds his partner for being violent with Samir. He has a PhD in Arabic Studies.

Clayton’s sensitive guy act asks us to believe that it’s only some FBI agents who are racist. But be that as it may, the movie avoids the fact that the War on Terror involves a heck of a lot of racism - a fact which effectively negates a few “good” guys here and there.

In the same way, throwing in a few lines about how Muslims are diverse doesn’t change the fact that Traitor’s essentially a movie that equates Islam with terrorism (within a film industry and government culture that does the same) - a fact which effectively negates a few good intentions here and there.

At one point, referring to Clayton’s (allegedly) racist partner, Samir says to Clayton: “The only difference between you and him is that he knows he’s an asshole.” With its fake worldliness, it wouldn’t be much of a stretch to say the same thing about Traitor, and say Iron Man. At least Iron Man doesn’t have any delusions that it’s a piece of progressive cinema.

By the by, it’s not just that all the Muslims in Traitor are terrorists. They’re also gullible, sloppy terrorists:

Omar, al-Nathir’s second-in-command, is fooled into believing that Samir is an earnest recruit (rather than a double agent for the American government) in the space of about 5 minutes.

al-Nathir allows Samir - a complete outsider - to rise quickly in the ranks in a matter of a few months.

Omar (again, al-Nathir’s 2nd-in-command) doesn’t know the most basic things about bombs - for eg that a bomb without a detonator is completely harmless.

Except for a brief meanwhile montage, no attempt is made to explain what motivates the terrorists characters to do what they do. Isn’t character motivation a basic element of plot writing? I suppose we should take this up with Steve Martin - that whacky guy co-wrote the script!

The only non-terrorist Muslim characters are all American or English Muslims.

This made me laugh out loud: when Samir makes contact with the terrorists-in-waiting, he identifies himself as a member of al-Nathir by saying…wait for it…As-Salaam-Alaikum. For serious.

Omar is the only terrorist character who appears to have depth and complexity (And he’s really the only compelling part of the movie. Or maybe that’s just because Saïd Taghmaoui is so swoonsome…) but despite that his death is completely glossed over.

Traitor has drawn many (undeserved) comparisons to The Bourne films, but it really has much more in common with John Le Carré’s 1983 novel Little Drummer Girl, which was later made into a film starring Diane Keaton.

Little Drummer Girl also deals with a spy under deep cover and the ethics of infiltration, and also tells the story from the point of view of both a Western anti-terrorist unit and Islamic terrorist group. But it does so with much more historical context and intelligence. If anybody wants to share their thoughts on Little Drummer Girl, I’d love to hear them.

Try again, Traitor.

* thanks gatamala!

** Ahem! Contrary to the movie’s dialogue is not the “ass-end of Canada” but rather the cultural centre of Eastern Canada and the home of Africville.

*** This story line perturbed me in particular because it reminded me of Project Thread, an anti-terrorism sting operation that led to the 2003 arrests of 24 South Asian Muslim men living on student visas in Toronto. The 24 were held in maximum-security prisons without access to lawyers.

They were arrested on charges of terrorism and widely reported in the media as terrorists - but no hard evidence that any of them were involved in terrorism was found. Nonetheless their names were never cleared and many of them were forced to return to their countries of origin.

Why were they suspected of terrorism in the first place? It appears the fact that they were South Asian Muslim men living on student visas was enough to rouse serious suspicion.

For more info you can access Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha’s article on Project Threadbare, the Toronto group that formed to try to protect the 24 men. Project Threadbare’s website is here.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. What Does a Muslim Look Like? » Islam on My Side on 05 Sep 2008 at 8:19 am

    […] now, please take a look at the following review of Traitor over on Racialicious. The movie is fraught with Muslim characters, some of whom even look like […]

Comments

  1. gatamala wrote:

    The spoiler alert should be moved up top!

    ;)

  2. The Cruel Secretary wrote:

    @Thea–
    ….now you *know* the producers (including Steve Martin–yep, *that* Steve Martin–and Don Cheadle) couldn’t sell the movie w/out a White (male) Savior and messy, gulliable Muslim terrorists. I mean, who would the audience identify with and hiss at?

    /snark

  3. DEAF FEMINIST PUNK!! wrote:

    I’m disappointed that Archie Panjabi, a highly respected British Asian actress, has resorted to making this movie. I’m also disappointed with Don Cheadle.

  4. Thea Lim wrote:

    @ DFP: Actually this movie made me think about how many roles in Hollywood 9/11 has created for South Asian/Middle Eastern/African actors - though that’s obviously not exactly positive…

    It’s a good question: whether or not actors of colour should avoid roles that are racist or stereotyping, esp when it’s the ONLY thing that’s offered to them.

    The Middle Eastern actors who played the terrorists in United 93 had something to say about that - I remember reading that initially when they heard about the movie, they wanted nothing to do with it, but after reading the script they changed their minds. (I could never bring myself to see that movie though, so I have no opinion as to whether or not that mind change made sense.)

    Don Cheadle in my mind is associated with movies that have that kind of pseudo-political, liberal, bleeding-heart attitude that calls out overt racism but are totally irritatingly dense to their own covert racism.

    HOWEVER! I have not seen any of said movies, like Reign Over Me, Hotel Rwanda or Crash. (I heard Hotel Rwanda was good actually). My impression comes solely from what I’ve heard said. Anybody whose seen these movies care to comment?

  5. gatamala wrote:

    I am sooooo tired of the terrorism theme. Tired. But like Cold War movies, they’re not going away. I want the affected people to control the bankrolling, writing and casting.

    FTR I love me some Don Cheadle. He is one of a few prominent bm actors out there.

  6. Cycads wrote:

    Ugh. ‘Traitor’ is just another recycled rubbish that had reformed very little since the days of films like ‘True Lies’. I think the title (’Traitor’) sounds foreboding.

    It amazes me that Hollywood just keeps making this stuff.

  7. Mohammed wrote:

    I feel like I need my $8.50 and also those 2 hours of my life back..what a complete waste of time this movie was. I too got played into thinking this was some type of Bourne-esque movie only to soon find out it was just another cookie-cutter “islam=>terrorism” piece of sh*t of movie.

    Apart from that, I was dissed once more.. as a Sudanese-American I was expecting to see for the first time, a representation of someone like me on the big screen. That’s what got me to take time out of my day to go check it out in the first place… Little did I know I’d walk into yet another interpretation of islam as the evil bomb-blowing religion, whiteys be careful!!! the only thing this film did, was probably associate a new skin color to terrorism, “hey even black the ones are terrorists too!”…

    if you want to watch this movie, do you… but dont expect anything new…

  8. Thea Lim wrote:

    @Mohammed

    Sigh, I paid $12. Damn that Jason Bourne! He’s my greatest weakness!

    I wonder if many people were suckered into seeing Traitor just because it seems like it might have a slightly more nuanced representation of Muslims. In some ways it makes me sad how desperate we are to see something a little bit less generalising and negligent.

    It almost seems like Steve Martin used Wikipedia as his source for “Muslims.” I guess that’s better than just writing Muslims based on blind prejudice and MSM rumours, but…

  9. Fatemeh wrote:

    Don Cheadle…(sniff)…how COULD you…I LOVED you…even after Crash!

    Yeah. Slammin’ analysis here, Thea. I can’t say that I’m surprised, but I am disappointed. Thankful, though. I didn’t fork out any money yet!

    altmuslim also has a review of this:
    http://www.altmuslim.com/a/a/r/2798/

  10. Lisa J wrote:

    @Thea “HOWEVER! I have not seen any of said movies, like Reign Over Me, Hotel Rwanda or Crash. (I heard Hotel Rwanda was good actually). My impression comes solely from what I’ve heard said. Anybody whose seen these movies care to comment?”
    Of those I’ve only seen Crash, it should have been called Trash, it makes me mad just thinking about it. I’d heard so much about it and how good it was. It stank more than month old curdled milk! It was so ill-conceived overly drawn out and racist while claiming to decry racism. Grr, it makes me so mad I can’t even think of anything intelligent to say about it now.

  11. Ismone wrote:

    I saw Don Cheadle in Crash, Hotel Rwanda, Out of Sight, and all those dumb Oceans movies.

    I think he is awesome. In Out of Sight, he is absolutely chilling. He has such range.

    And second on Little Drummer Girl being a great book. As much as I love all of Le Carre’s stuff, (well, Tailor of Panama was a little weak) nothing has ever replaced the Little Drummer Girl in my affections.

  12. Rchoudh wrote:

    I don’t understand Hollywood. Last year they had all these anti-Iraq war movies out that were supposed to make Americans stop supporting the war (which they did on their own without the help of those movies). Movies like this only help to defeat the purpose behind making all those anti-war movies. It’s like what do you want people to believe Hollywood? That war is bad or that it’s worth fighting for?

  13. Brian Johnson wrote:

    @Rchoudh: Really, I don’t think Hollywood has a coherent “agenda” regarding what its audience believes; it simply produces movies that it predicts will generate big box office sales. Playing upon the emotional triggers of ethnic fears and prejudices is an easy way to do this.

  14. Rchoudh wrote:

    @Brian

    You’re right I should have realized it’s all really about the bottom line for them at the end of the day. Since anti-war movies failed to make any sort of profit last year it’s back to cops and robbers/terrrorists movies for H’Wood.

  15. Sobia wrote:

    It actually does scare me to think that one of the main messages of the film appears to be that ANY Muslim can be a terrorist regardless of their background, life experiences etc. And on top of that, since the film didn’t explain the motives of these characters for becoming terrorists, the film additionally seems to be saying that Muslims don’t actually have any reasons for engaging in such behaviour. So not only could your Muslim neighbour next door be a terrorist but he/she (most likely ‘he’) could be one just for the hell of it. Seriously Hollywood - I thought you were getting better.

    And WTF with the “ass-end of Canada” comment in the film??!! I’m a Canadian East-Coaster AND Muslim and I almost feel more offended by that Halifax insult! But dear God - are they implying that there are terrorists in Halifax too?? I guess wherever there’s a Muslim there’s a terrorist eh? *banging head on keyboard*

  16. Diana wrote:

    I actually liked the film overall, although I thought the idea that a suicide bomber was lurking in every corner of America was bit over the top. I may have been biased a bit by my love of Cheadle as an actor, plus I saw it for free. Here’s my take at http://mesoamused.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/traitor/

  17. Jaye wrote:

    Thanks for the heads up Thea. I was going to watch it because it looked like an intelligent action thriller that was going to break down the stereotypes of Muslims. Now I’ll just watch Death Race instead.

  18. Thea Lim wrote:

    @Lisa J - yeah, you essentially confirmed what I heard. As an anti-racist pop culture blogger perhaps I should watch Crash, but I just can’t bring myself to!

    I almost feel like we should send a memo to Don Cheadle and ask him to account for his actions… :)

    @Sobia
    Haha I had the same response. I was excited to see Toronto featured in the movie, but then I was like “Actually they’re saying that Toronto is full of Muslim terrorists”…Yeesh.

    Yeah, I thought the snipe at Halifax was a little mean hence, my attempt to introduce some Canada learnin’…

  19. Abu Sinan wrote:

    Movies like this contribute to the fear that people have of Muslims. I see it from both ends because I am white AND a Muslim.

    I am a “regular American” until they find out I am married to an Arab and that I pray, fast, just like all Muslims. Then I become one of “them”.

    This underlaying hatred, partially based on racism (arent all Muslims non white) is what is also working against Obama.

    Like one old white lady said on NPR today, no matter what Obama says, she still thinks he is a Muslim until the day he dies and she wont vte for him because of it. I think this portion of the American electorate is much bigger than people think.

  20. mindyourbeeswax wrote:

    No one should see ¨The Little Drummer Girl¨, because the film version was bad beyond belief and I believe I heard the sound of the great Le Carre tearing his hair out.

    However, apropos the sentiments in ´Traitor´ if anyone really wants a great piece of work about motivation and all that it involved, then they should read The Little Drummer Girl please. For one thing, it´s a great novel. But in the name of authenticity, Le Carre spent time in Palestinian camps and a lot of time in Israel…..pity the director of ´Traitor´didn´t….but delighted that Thea Lim puts her foot down…

  21. mido wrote:

    im middle eastern and here the movie disappointed us and thats not the movie we were expecting from a big star like don

    anyway i see here some pretty good opinions
    and better luck on your next cheadle

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.