A Continuing Conversation on Feminism: Do You Know Who You’re Fighting For?

by Latoya Peterson

I was planning to write this post when I began my guest blogging stint over at Feministe. Then I looked around and noticed a lot of smart women were thinking along the same lines, so I decided to go ahead and put this out there.

After all the issues in the feminist blogoshere, I had decided I was sick of feminism. Feminism is a space in which I feel like I shouldn’t have to fight so hard, and yet I do. I am getting sick of learning knowledge and tools and tactics at such a high cost. And while I have chosen to stay, it is more out of a sense of duty to others than edification of the self.

For you see, I wrote about the issues I have in engaging with white people last year. I have discussed often how this is still an existing bias, and something I work toward fighting against. What I have not talked about is how this translates into real life.

In real life, I generally do not have cause to interact with white people on a regular basis. My friend group is diverse, encompassing people from various races, ethnicities, and backgrounds – but there is no white representation in my immediate circle. Besides one or two friends I held over from high school who I see semi-annually, I don’t see many white people socially. I hang in PoC areas, go to events dominated by other PoC, work for a international organization in a predominantly black department, I pay my rent to the rental office staffed by black and latina women, my neighborhood and my building is predominantly PoC – even the belly dancing classes I take are operated by and designed for women of color. Outside of my yoga studio – which is predominantly white, but still manages to attract a large mix of ethnicities to practice within its walls – I generally do not come into contact with white people on a regular basis. I see them commuting, on the metro, in transit – but my life is generally one long PoC party.

So, it is important to me to state that it is mentally taxing for me to go into non-PoC spaces on a regular basis. I find it exhausting. White dominated spaces are difficult for me to deal with because of all the issues involved with privilege and reference points. I find it tiring to be lectured at about my lived experience. I get weary when I see the same tired ideas rehashed over and over as if they have never been debunked before (i.e. – “Well, did you ever think that all the black actresses who tried out for that role weren’t as good, so they gave the role to a white woman?” Wow, no, I never thought of that! I guess that explains all those roles who are offered to certain actresses to accept or decline before they ever make it to the casting!)

While I understand how to navigate such a space, it is never a place I find comfortable and they are places where I am constantly on guard. One could ask why it has to be this way? Why should I assume I need to be on guard in a space created to foster discussion between women? It is because these spaces have been proven to be hostile – and dropping your guard in a hostile environment is the quickest way to get popped in the face.

I continue to hang in feminist spaces for a few different reasons. One, some of the people I consider allies are there and I want to show them some support. Two, because I want to start catching people who are becoming disillusioned. I want them to be able to find me. I want them to find links to me to someone they can relate to. It doesn’t have to be me. It just has to be someone. And three, because it helps me to find like-minded women, also relegated to the margins. I could easily find a womanist space to fall into. I could find a space that is by and for black women (sans the “feminist” or “womanist” label) but I want a bit more than that.

Many other women of color have experiences I want to know, I want to hear from their lips. I cried when I read Yell-Oh Girls, when I read Colonize This!, when I saw I Like It Like That. I cried because in their pain, I heard echoes of my own.

We may not share the same lyrics, but somehow we are singing the same song. And that is what I want – that community.

But I digress.

Floating around the internet, it appears that other women are also working their way through this conclusion.

Sudy is on her own adventure in the Phillipines. She began questioning early:

What role do US feminist identified activists have in transnational feminist activism and issues?

[...]

What is the practical application of “intersectionality,” this popular term bounced around in the femosphere? Is it just a means to better understand and construct our kyriarchal society, or is it meant to lead to something specific in action?

Her mind is full of questions these days:

How do you survive?
How do you feed them?
What is life like as a poor peasant woman on this farmland which is repeatedly stolen from you?
Why is this world failing you?
How can feminism be so incomplete?
What is within my power to change, do, or improve?
How can you be pregnant again?

And she asks more:

I think of blogging. I think of blogwars. I think of inevitable drama that ensues among strong women who have agendas and egos the size of an island. I think of waste.

What IS my activism? Where am I in the unfolding story of ALL women’s liberation? Where do I want to plant my bare feet and which field’s soil do I want to plant? Judy asks me what is my statement.

“My statement?”

Yes. You must have a direct, strong, inquiring statement about what you want to do. Or else, she says, “…you’re just a feminist.”

WOOOOOah.

Feminists are the aware, the thinkers, the ones who see something very wrong in the world of gender and recognize the inequality on every scale: workforce to militarization, motherhood to childcare, state violence to sexual harassment.

And then what?


And she continues to explore
.

BlackAmazon is has still more questions:

And at AMC I was uplifted and inspired by many people seeking to do work that served communities and was LED by communities.

But I find myself asking once again ( and thank fully in the space I asked it in this time I was not made to feel like I was alone or crazy but instead embraced)

Who are we serving with this?

This being environmentalism, racial justice, educational reform.social justice,LGBTQ rights

Who are we trying to listen to?

(Or, as Latoya asked herself a few months back, what the fuck is the point?)

Brownfemipower penned an interesting piece discussing sexuality, the role of music as a survival method, and how we marginalized folks end up co-opting hostile spaces for our own needs. She then discusses the tactic that is often taken by feminist organizations:

Which makes me wonder. If feminists are interested in ending misogyny and sexism in music, is the way to do that really to work to ban the music or otherwise protest it? Or, thinking in terms of grassroots mobilization, if small town queers in the U.S. are manipulating those problematic spaces to suit their needs, will they necessarily stand in alliance with big time feminists? I know I personally never did. I was sympathetic to the cause–but honestly, bands like Aerosmith and Guns N Roses seemed to ‘get’ small town mentality so much better than the feminists.

Nasty pig boy Axl Rose was from small town Indiana and understood the how stifling dictates from above of “don’t do that it’s wrong and nasty and offensive” really were. And I don’t doubt for a minute that GNR manipulated things to appear as if they were “standing up for the little guy” all the while selling more music. But I don’t think feminists of that time ever *really* understood how they were perceived as little more than a continuation of the small town power structure that wanted to control and shame rather than liberate and encourage.

I don’t think they do even today.

Which goes back to the question–what is the answer for feminists that want to end misogyny and sexism in music? I think that creating alternatives is a much more powerful action–creating a space where those people who are looking to challenge or move away from the power that is stifling them can go and thrive. As an example, once I was introduced to punk/alternative (as in Nirvana, Green Day, etc) I pretty much left the hard rock/heavy metal scene. Punk/Alternative bands seemed to get their point across, rock out like crazy, and were totally accepting of queers and other misfits–and they did it (at least then) without the crazy sexism of the hair bands (I’m not letting punk/alternative bands completly off the hook, there was sexism, just not in the in your face style of the hair bands).

Could feminists do the same thing? And I ask this with the realization that *women* (as opposed to feminists) have been working within and outside of the music industry to create their own spaces for decades. And awesome feminists like Ani DiFranco have actually made a career of touring small towns. But when was the last time there was a queer pride music fest in Holland, Michigan (as an example)? When was the last time feminists who were protesting misogyny in music demanded that feminists bands like L7 got huge contracts rather than demanding that sexist bands be shut down (see the difference in the point of the protest?)? How many feminist concert tours have major organizations that have the money (aka NOW, Feminist Majority, etc) not just sponsored but organized and put on? How many scholarships for budding feminist musicians (or artists/writers/etc) have feminist organizations created? (On a side note, when it comes to funding, I’ve actually found that most mainstream feminist org’s actively distance themselves from artists in favor of those who are doing science and business).

However, the entire passage I just highlighted is struck through. BFP apparently had a midpost ephiphany:

I deleted the above because it was irritating me. Why am I constantly writing about how to “make a movement” when the damn “movement” has made it perfectly clear that I am not welcome? Do I really care about “the movement” or do I care about the lonely and depressed queer girls out in the middle of Religious Town U.S.A? Lonely and depressed queer girls, forget the above paragraphs and pay special attention to the paragraph below. There are alternatives out there. There are spaces where your presence is not only honored but desperately needed. And some times, you don’t have to leave your area to find those spaces. When you get out–pay attention to what amazing women like Invincible did–go back. Go back and sing that voice out loud and powerful and strong. Then teach other lonely and depressed queer girls how to do the same thing. Bless all of us with your words, your voice, your music!

Which brings us back to the question – do you know who you’re fighting for?

BFP nails it when she asks:

Do I really care about “the movement” or do I care about the lonely and depressed queer girls out in the middle of Religious Town U.S.A?

I don’t know if I still care about feminism.

I care about my homegirls.

I care about the girls who remind me of me. The ones with the dark skin and the full lips, the ones who will have their bodies develop before they understand what that means, the ones who will grow up listening to men implore them to be “Bust it Babies,” hearing that the most desirable women work at a strip club, the ones who feel like the things they want are desperately out of reach, the ones who feel as though they are always failing, that they will never be good enough.

I care about the girls who remind me of my homegirls. The ones who dare to have their own dreams when their parents have already written their destinies in stone, the ones who find that almond eyes and tanned skin will always be exotic, never beautiful, the ones who rock cornrows and stretch jeans knowing that for many the idea of brown-skinnned-thick-and-Asian is not something easily understood, the ones who realize that beauty ideals were never designed with them in mind, the ones with frizzy hair and thick thighs that find out early that men can be a way out of a bad situation or a way into a worse one.

I fight for them.

I fight for us.

So, if that means I am the ones taking in the lumps and hostility, watching people degender us because it is too inconvenient to deal with our race and class issues, trying to force myself to write civil responses to things even when I feel like screaming, then so be it.

If I can pass on just one thing that helps a young girl make it through, it is worth it.

That’s my story.

So I ask you, readers – what are you fighting for?

(Photo Credit: Sudy)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Who are you fighting for? « Tanglad on 14 Jul 2008 at 12:23 pm

    [...] July 14, 2008 by tanglad LaToya at Racialicious challenges us to remember who we are fighting for. [...]

  2. La Chola » Blog Archive » one of those lonely and depressed queer girls on 14 Jul 2008 at 12:54 pm

    [...] via racialicious I grew up in a small town in the rural Midwest. The main things going on there were religion, football, the Republican party, teen pregnancy, crystal meth and soybean fields. None of these things interested me. I stumbled my way through adolescence. When I was accepted into a school on the far away East coast, I jumped at the chance. I go back for holidays, and people always ask me when I’m going to “come back home.” It isn’t home. It never has been home. Yet I am still a Midwesterner. I listen to music that speaks to my Midwestern farm-town soul, wear Midwestern-style clothes, drink Midwestern beer and eat Midwestern food. I can tell the difference between a beef-cattle farm and a dairy farm with my eyes closed and with my fingers in my ears. My accent is a small-town Midwestern drawl. I love and hate the Midwest – I love its beauty and the knowledge that I could walk down the street in the town of my childhood and every person I meet knows my name and who my parents and siblings are, and the insularity; and I hate the close-mindedness, the busybodiness, and knowledge that I could walk down the street in the town of my childhood and every person I meet knows my name and who my parents and siblings are. I go to events or read blogs where well-meaning rich white feminists talk about how important it is that a new women’s center with plush sofas has been built in midtown Manhattan, and I remember that there were two queer students in my high school graduating class. I made it out town, I have a college degree, and my parents have accepted that I’m a lesbian. He didn’t make it out, his parents disowned him when he came out to them, and he’s dead now. Yes, it is important that queer kids in the city have someplace to go. But what about the queer kid who goes to school in a building built between cornfields and every resource he can lay his hands on tells him that his crush on the boy next door is sinful and wrong? What about the poor woman who is being abused by her husband and needs somewhere to flee but has no where to go? What about the couple with four kids and who can’t afford a fifth but have nowhere to buy the Pill because the only pharmacy within a hundred miles is Wal-Mart? These people are just as real as those on the Upper East Side, and their needs are just as real too. [...]

  3. La Chola » Blog Archive » because my self control has just expired. on 14 Jul 2008 at 6:30 pm

    [...] Ok, I’m back. I just can’t take it any more. I’ve stewed and grumbled and growled and gotten angrier and angrier–the latest round of “it’s *really* the ‘intersectionalists’ fault” has come out: see here (via). [...]

  4. Who are We Fighting For… on 14 Jul 2008 at 9:07 pm

    [...] on Racialicious has a fascinating post up today about feminism, being a PoC (person of color) and coming home to an idea of herself and [...]

  5. You Should Sing This to the Tune of That Godawful Delilah Song « Off Our Pedestals on 14 Jul 2008 at 9:49 pm

    [...] Alternet article via Racialicious via La Chola. And now, could we get a mike [...]

  6. i’ve thought about this « Grad School Mommy on 14 Jul 2008 at 10:47 pm

    [...] a long with white women but generally find most white men we come into contact with pretty cool. Latoya at Racialicious puts it beautifully: In real life, I generally do not have cause to interact with white people on a [...]

  7. When you get too weary, remember who you are fighting for « don’t do that on 15 Jul 2008 at 11:25 am

    [...] Read it all here. [...]

  8. season of the bitch » Post in draft… on 15 Jul 2008 at 11:48 am

    [...] now, I recommend this, Hilzoy on the government’s bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and this, wherein Latoya asks what we’re fighting for when it comes to feminism. Interestingly, both [...]

  9. Open Thread: What Does Your Community Look Like? at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 17 Jul 2008 at 10:57 am

    [...] now I am curious. When I made a comment about my life being one big PoC party on this thread, I got back a response that I didn’t anticipate. A few people (on the thread and on BFPs [...]

  10. Michelle Obama and white feminists « What If on 25 Aug 2008 at 11:36 pm

    [...] because it has been said so many times before. The most goose-bump-inducing one I’ve read was by Latoya at Racialicious, and I’ll be happy to add any similar links that anyone wants to [...]

Comments

  1. VELMA SABINA!!! wrote:

    “I care about the girls who remind me of me. The ones with the dark skin and the full lips, the ones who will have their bodies develop before they understand what that means, the ones who will grow up listening to men implore them to be “Bust it Babies,” hearing that the most desirable women work at a strip club, the ones who feel like the things they want are desperately out of reach, the ones who feel as though they are always failing, that they will never be good enough.”

    What such f–king bullshit.

    That’s the biggest problem with people today. People don’t wanna “identify” with those from different walks of life, and that’s a huge fucking shame.

    I’m talking about white, black, brown, yellow people. Everybody who thinks they gotta play “favourites” cos they claim they can’t identify with people who are “different” from them.

    For the record, I am 100% profoundly Deaf, Muslim, South Asian, dark-skinned, an immigrant born in Europe, raised in the United States, and I work in theatre.

    oohhh yeah! That must mean I can’t idenfity with many people, right? Wrong. I try to identify and sympathize with all kinds of people. I don’t limit myself to “my people,” whatever the f–k that’s supposed to mean.

  2. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @Velma –

    1. You can say fuck here. No kittens will die.

    2. Yeah, that’s kind of the point of the piece – that we can identify with many different people. However, I get the impression that when many feminists picture a woman, they picture one that is close to them and their experience. There is *nothing* wrong with that. But there is something wrong with trying to actively push people out because they are different because they don’t necessarily fit the idea of woman you have in your head.

    The alienation I feel from feminism is due to this issue, this friction. In many circles, it does tend to push this way or that. Like that comment you posted to Feministe about blond, big chested bimbos – and the woman who followed up explaining that you hurt her with you comment. Feminism is for big chested blond girls too.

    The problem comes in when people want to push others out from feminism because they have too many “other” issues. Like you, Velma. There are people who would tell you that your ability issues have no place in feminism, that being a Muslimah means you have no place in feminism, that bringing your brown experiences into a discussion of beauty standards is distracting from the real issue.

    And that is not the feminism I want to see.

    I like Sudy’s feminism, Fatemeh’s feminism, black Amazon’s feminism, BFPs feminism because they are all my people. They understand being pushed to the margins. That’s where we fight from.

    Go back and reread the top paragraphs, Velma. The point of the piece is not to fragment people into racial factions, but to start thinking – who is your feminism for? Who do you serve? Why are you there?

  3. Leigh wrote:

    Thank you, Latoya. Thank you for fighting for and with girls like me. We all need someone to remind us that we are not alone in the struggle .

    I wish I could say more but your post has made me really emotional.

  4. DEAF FEMINIST PUNK!! wrote:

    Very true, LaToya, good point. (its me velma, btw, I changed my username here again)

    the truth is, I have not really felt alienated that often by other white feminists. I don’t know, but I’ve never really thought about it until I read about the whole BrownFemPower controversy with that white feminist author allegedly stealing her ideas and materials and passing it off as her own.

    I guess I’m still thinking about it. The only times I’ve felt alienated, though, is when it comes to feminism and gender issues in Muslim/South Asian cultures, when I felt like that some white feminists really didn’t “get it.”

  5. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @DFP –

    I know it’s you, Velma, you always have the same writing style so it doesn’t matter what screen name you use.

    I forget who I was talking to, but it took me a while to explain to them that not *all* women of color have this issue within feminism. It really depends on your own life experiences.

    I chafe because feminism doesn’t serve me or the people I love very well at all, and it can actually inflict more damage by telling young impressionable girls that their views and ideas and opinions don’t matter.

    For other women, this isn’t the case. Gender issues may have figured more prominently than race issues which led them to their current state and satisfaction with feminism.

    However, feminism still presents itself at being for “all women” – so there has to be some form of reconciliation.

    From where I sit, that starts by acknowledging that we all move through life differently – so by design feminism will *have* to be able to engage with different issues, see different tactics, and have multiple plans to deal with variations on the same theme in order to be successful.

  6. tanglad wrote:

    Omg, LaToya. Thank you seriously for this post. And I’ve also been meaning to thank you for your patience at hanging around those feminist spaces.

    I’ve been trying to avoid the big feminist blogs because I’ve been disheartened at a lot of responses to issues facing women in developing countries. The scope of my activism is on how globalization creates economic development policies that further marginalize vulnerable women in Southeast Asian countries. I focus on the Philippines and the Philippine diaspora. I hope that my schoolwork, my writing, and my activism somehow help to support the women who are ignored and displaced by “development aggression” in the Philippines–indigenous women, Muslim women, peasant farmers, female workers in the export processsing zones.

    I am a strong believer in transnational feminist coalitions. I believe that groups like the Maquiladora Solidarity Network and GabNet USA highlight how feminist advocates can be linked through the exchange of labor, capital, and development ideologies between countries and throughout regions. (For example, when the garment workers at the export processing zone in Cavite unionized, the fact that Maquiladora kept publicizing the campaign to clothesmakers and consumers here in the US protected many union organizers from being “disappeared.”)

    I understand that these transnational alliances will not always come easily, nor will they always be comfortable. But it’s been a discouraging experience to visit the big feminist blogs and mainstream feminist spaces lately, where issues like the ones I’m concerned with are labelled as not specifically feminist issues, but are instead “general issues” that “overburden” feminism.

    I guess this is just a roundabout way for me to say that I care about vulnerable Filipinas, whose lives have been continually marginalized and devalued. And if my feminism proves to be an inadequate path of acting on their behalf, then I guess I’ll have to work at forging new ones.

  7. Sumayyah wrote:

    Thank you, LaToya, for writing this. I wonder sometimes who I’m fighting for, and I often wonder why does it all matter? We all have our comfort zones, but real life means confronting things that are uncomfortable. Bottom line: we’re in this ship together, and if it sinks, we’re all going to drown. We MUST learn to look at the bigger picture. Until EVERYONE has the same rights and respect, the struggle will continue. We’re all responsible, and it affects all of us.

  8. DEAF FEMINIST PUNK!! wrote:

    Now that I’ve thought about it, I have one experience to share.

    I remember how one time I got deeply offended when I went to see “The Vagina Monologues” and there was a monologue about an Afghan Muslim woman in a burqa, read and performed by a white American female. I’m sure she had good intentions, but it just rubbed me off the wrong way.

    It was like the speech was saying “oh boo hoo I’m a poor weak oppressed Muslim woman and I hate this burqa, I hate being Afghan, I need you white people to help and liberate me.”

    I felt pretty pissed off about that speech for a long time.

  9. Alexandra wrote:

    Great Post Latoya, I’m relatively new to feminism and the feminist blogosphere in general but I often find myself disappointed lack the of intersectionality exhibited. Particularly as an African-American woman I am sick and tired race and sex being treated like to two separate issues. Or race and class being treated like two separate issues and so on. I tired of hearing other voices being left out of the conversation or minimized. Yes I admit I identify morel issues affecting black women or women of color in general. However I still recognize the oppressions of others and often people are have to deal with one or more which I see a serious lack of in feminism.

  10. Renee wrote:

    @La Toya I feel ya girl. I continue to engage in feminist circles even though I know that it is highly policed. It can be a difficult place for a WOC to be. I have twisted and contorted my understanding of feminism to try and squeeze in but sometimes it is hard on the soul. I find that I am constantly calling white feminists out either for their silencing or bullying behavior. I do it not only to vent my frustrations but to express a solidarity with WOC. I feel that if we don’t speak out we will get lost and forgotten. Everyday I make it a point to say that WOC matter. If we don’t place ourselves on the agenda feminism is more than happy to move on and use us as support staff without ever addressing issues that are unique to us.
    I think I keep going back and I keep blogging for the women that are just starting to struggle to define themselves. I guess I want them to know that they will have to fight for their space and not come upon that as a surprise the way I did. I want them to know that even if it is just me, someone validates and gets their experience. Truth be known I have had it with a lot of white feminists but I cannot forsake the movement completely because to do so would mean that gender was not a significant factor in my life and as we all know women not matter what race have it rough in this world. Somehow, someway the squeaky wheels that are currently running the feminist movement have got to be brought to heel. They don’t have the right to own this movement and make it all about themselves. I am just as much woman as they are.

  11. Fatemeh wrote:

    Latoya, I love you forever. Excellent post.

    It gets exhausting to interact with (often white) feminists who don’t understand your viewpoint (speaking as Muslim feminist of color). It gets exhausting to be talked to as a stereotype or as a representative, though I understand the necessity of it (nobody’s gonna dispel this mess for us). It’s draining to be deflecting attacks that are aimed at your faith or your race or your culture, but hit you instead.

  12. misslyddie wrote:

    wonderful post. it’s so important to keep questioning even the most simple-seeming things in our lives, and this blog always has me questioning my choices and actions, which is great.

    now you’ve got me thinking about the issue I have with my work/what I want to be more work… the fact that I am white, and I want my feminism to be for girls in the developing world- to stop the spread of eating disorders as western culture/media tries to assert dominance over indigenous culture and to empower girls to know that there is no one ideal beautiful (white) woman that they need to become to have power in the world. That’s what I want to fight for. However, I’ve always been hesitant because I know that as a white person, I could do so much more damage than good simply by asserting myself as a person with the power to “help.” I don’t think that I should be working for people like me, because we are the people with privilege, like it or not. This post has really made me question this choice that I’ve made. By making my feminism or whatever about WOC, is that wrong or racist? I need to constantly check myself, and posts like this really help me do it. This has been the most rambly, scatterbrained comment ever.

  13. Esteleth wrote:

    Do I really care about “the movement” or do I care about the lonely and depressed queer girls out in the middle of Religious Town U.S.A?

    As someone who once was one of those lonely and depressed queer girls out in the middle of Religious Town U.S.A., I, for one, would like to say, “thank you.”
    I grew up in a small town in the rural Midwest. The main things going on there were religion, football, the Republican party, teen pregnancy, crystal meth and soybean fields. None of these things interested me. I stumbled my way through adolescence. When I was accepted into a school on the far away East coast, I jumped at the chance. I go back for holidays, and people always ask me when I’m going to “come back home.” It isn’t home. It never has been home. Yet I am still a Midwesterner. I listen to music that speaks to my Midwestern farm-town soul, wear Midwestern-style clothes, drink Midwestern beer and eat Midwestern food. I can tell the difference between a beef-cattle farm and a dairy farm with my eyes closed and with my fingers in my ears. My accent is a small-town Midwestern drawl. I love and hate the Midwest – I love its beauty and the knowledge that I could walk down the street in the town of my childhood and every person I meet knows my name and who my parents and siblings are, and the insularity; and I hate the close-mindedness, the busybodiness, and knowledge that I could walk down the street in the town of my childhood and every person I meet knows my name and who my parents and siblings are.
    I go to events or read blogs where well-meaning rich white feminists talk about how important it is that a new women’s center with plush sofas has been built in midtown Manhattan, and I remember that there were two queer students in my high school graduating class. I made it out town, I have a college degree, and my parents have accepted that I’m a lesbian. He didn’t make it out, his parents disowned him when he came out to them, and he’s dead now.
    Yes, it is important that queer kids in the city have someplace to go. But what about the queer kid who goes to school in a building built between cornfields and every resource he can lay his hands on tells him that his crush on the boy next door is sinful and wrong? What about the poor woman who is being abused by her husband and needs somewhere to flee but has no where to go? What about the couple with four kids and who can’t afford a fifth but have nowhere to buy the Pill because the only pharmacy within a hundred miles is Wal-Mart? These people are just as real as those on the Upper East Side, and their needs are just as real too.
    Sorry for the length of this comment, but this post really touched a nerve with me. I will keep saying these sorts of things in feminist communities whenever I can, and maybe someday the message will get through.

  14. drea wrote:

    Thanks for asking the question Latoya! I’m a young black woman working in a very white male dominated field in which there are constant conversations about the treatment of women in our profession. There are numerous conferences and organizations designed to address the concerns of women in the field. I must admit that I’ve never felt that those efforts were intended for me. In fact, I find that in my career, I’m often accepted as one of the guys. Wait…scratch that. I’m often never considered one of the girls. Either way, I don’t experience the traditional sexism that some of my white female colleagues experience. Race, however, does play a major role in my professional life. Thus, I find myself fighting for PoC in this community and setting my invisible gender aside.
    Like you Latoya, my social life is dominated by PoC, and this is where I fight most of my feminist battles. These tiresome conversations are with friends, family, and a community who feel the pain of racism themselves, but see no hypocrisy in inflicting the pain of sexism on others. So, who do I fight for? I guess it just depends on the time of day.

  15. stankerbell wrote:

    LaToya, you have me crying at work….

    Thank you for this post.

  16. atlasien wrote:

    I was raised a feminist by a feminist and plan on staying a feminist. I don’t see what good I would do by not being one. But ultimately, it’s just a word… and as you’re pointing out here, the goal is what matters, not the word.

  17. Cynthia wrote:

    This isn’t just a non-white issue, but a non-Anglo issue (at least in the United States and English-speaking Canada). Immigrant white women also aren’t necessarily spoken for in feminist circles as the culture in mainstream feminism is largely educated and Anglo. Just a thought.

  18. purpleshinycrafter wrote:

    Esteleth–thanks for saying that. Yes. That. That was and is me also.

  19. purpleshinycrafter wrote:

    (And if you have thoughts on the practical things I can do for queer midwestern women, from my cushy liberal big-city east coast bubble, please please point me at them).

  20. Slush wrote:

    @Latoya – that’s how I found this blog, from which I have learned a ton. I think those efforts have contributed to the growth of your readership, and it’s really worth it.

    To support you in your exhaustion, I can just say that I also think it’s worth all the effort. I think it does change lives.

    Being a white feminist myself, I don’t blame them for not knowing or understand POC issues very well. (Ignoring or discounting is a totally different story). I notice that even my most feminist male friend is limited in what he thinks is important to feminism or how things might affect women, not because he’s not well versed in deconstructing stereotypes and power dynamics, but because he’s never been treated like a woman. Seeing how others are treated is important, but its a limited insight.

    I’ve never been treated like a woman of color, either. So I can try pretty hard to conceive of what is important for a WOC feminist agenda, but there’s a pretty solid chance I would miss some things. For example, from Racialicious I’ve learned a boatload of racist and sexist stereotypes I’d never heard of anywhere before, exactly because I am not the target – and in many cases never even been a witness.

    So in many cases, how would I know that something was a reference to racial stereotypes at all? Because women of color explain it to me.

  21. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Being a white feminist myself, I don’t blame them for not knowing or understand POC issues very well. (Ignoring or discounting is a totally different story).

    Yeah, it is. There are a lot of things I don’t know and I’m fairly shocked to learn each day. (See Tagland’s track back. My mouth dropped open at what she described.)

    But there is a big difference between people who want to know and understand and people who want to minimize and deflect. And there’s a lot of people on both sides on this one. That’s what makes it so tiring. If we could address things and have people listen, awesome. But often, I find myself coming in and saying the same thing over and over again. Just now, they preface their comments with crap like “I care about racism. And classism. I just want to focus on feminism” – wtf? Where do you even go with that? You could explain why it’s wrong, but that person isn’t listening. They don’t give a fuck. Check the comments to that bottom piece where I wrote “I feel like screaming.” My god, are you telling me I can’t live my freaking life now? How dare I experience more than one oppression at a time?

    That kind of shit. That’s why some feminist convos I prefer to have here first – just that much easier. I don’t have to deal with people smacking with their privilege before I can get a damn sentence out.

    One thing I do wish white feminists would do more is to call that crap on the carpet when they see it. I know it can be difficult, but silence generally allows something to keep happening.

  22. Keren wrote:

    Thanks for this very heartfelt post, Latoya.
    I haven’t ever really felt that feminism doesn’t represent me but perhaps it’s because my encounter with feminism has never been very ‘white’ anyway, or perhaps that’s a UK thing, I don’t know. To be honest I’ve felt far more marginalised and silenced by the anti-racist movement than by feminism but I realise that’s just because my experiences don’t fit in anywhere.
    I’d be interested to know whether there are any Brits of colour here who feel as alienated by (UK) feminism as it seems that American women do?

  23. Jill wrote:

    I wanted to leave a comment to say that this post contains a lot of observations/thoughts from your experiences that I can relate to, as weird or unbelievable as that might sound, and it’s making me wonder, are the conversations about feminism that are going on now (the questioning of it and the criticisms of it and more) indicative of saying that simply being a woman is just not enough to draw us together?

    I’m sorry if that’s really simplistic sounding, it’s just what struck me as I was reading.

    Because I definitely do not feel embraced in the feminism I read about or encounter when I probably should be able to embrace some of it.

    Instead, I much more relate to what you say in this post about being for the ones you most identify with (if I’m understanding what you’ve written). I mean, that makes the most sense.

    But also – maybe this only works one way? If I’m the privileged person (which I know I am), then – am I supposed to also go beyond my comfort zone to help others? But if I’m not privileged (in class or race or another dimension), then the responsibility isn’t there or is less strong?

    I don’t know – it’s just what your post is making me think about. I’m going to have to read this a few more times, but thank you for taking the time to share and post these thoughts. And letting them be public. I do not mean to intrude on your community – I wanted to thank you for creating it.

  24. zack wrote:

    thank you for writing because in that act, you break through isolation and one of the ways all of us are kept down is through Isolation, thinking that our struggles are personal and that we are alone.

    to be effective as women and as feminists, i think that where we position our work is important. my experience as a lifelong activist in mid-age is that the most important thing to keep yourself going is to find pockets of hope, projects that you feel resonate with the future you hope to create. finding positive people who are doing positive things that are not just fighting against something, but also more importantly creating something different and positive together.

    coalition-building is the work of our time and it is tough work, the hardest i have ever done. i am a white woman who has spent the past five years working for a grassroots nonprofit neighborhood community technology center where very few people who come through the door look like me. i live in the neighborhood where i work.

    to make a difference, what seems important is to use my talents to serve as a kind of glue in the organization — to not assume a leadership role, but to intuit and support the leadership development of others. i do everything from sweep the floors and bake birthday cakes to write grants and support the education curriculum development efforts in the background, things that make a big difference and free people around me up to grow and develop.

    i have learned a lot from this. it has changed me. white spaces are highly uncomfortable for me now, tho i do force myself to work with one white antiracist group that are at least “trying” to do their work. i also work with one Poc org where i have been asked to make my role to go out on the side to specifically challenge and labor with white people who attend and are oblivious to the fact that they are being disruptive and disrespectful.

    i find that i learn the most and feel most successful as i develop the ability to tolerate the discomfort that i feel in almost all the spaces in my life. i can make the best contributions if i really take the time to listen and count to 30 before i react to people (give myself time to let my emotions level out). and listening means being willing to change. the thing that is the most difficult in coalition-building is people’s unwillingness to change.

  25. Jill wrote:

    I just want to clarify one thing, because when I read that “am I supposed to…” that does not sound the way I heard it in my head!

    By “supposed to”, I mean and meant, “I must because it’s what is right to do” not the “supposed to” that can be interpreted as feeling “put upon.” Eek. Sorry.

  26. queenofsheba wrote:

    I have a question–what does caring about the movement mean? Caring about how people who aren’t the movement’s people (women, PoC, non-straight, whatever) think about and deal with the movement’s issue? Caring about how the other people who are vocal on the movement’s issue in public space conduct themselves? Caring about policy changes in relation to the movement’s issue?

    What does caring about the movement mean?

  27. jvansteppes wrote:

    Or perhaps it ought to be phrased “do you know who you’re struggling WITH?”

    Why do so many white middle class feminists talk about speaking FOR other groups rather than speaking WITH them, in solidarity?

    “Feminism”, like so many social movements, has become something of an institution, one that demands loyalty rather than earning it. It’s time for white women to earn the trust of WOC instead of inviting them to beg for a place at the table.

    Thanks for another good read.

  28. Grandpa Dinosaur wrote:

    Cynthia – I was actually thinking and still think the same thing.

    I think what I had always wanted from “feminism” as a child was the support and assurance that I was an able human being. And I was initially taught that “Feminists care about the well being of all women,” but as I grew older I learned that the Feminists I kept meeting kept spouting racist and hypocritical bullshit that went no where.

    The “Feminists” I had met and still meet on the street were empty-headed, ignorant of their own hypocrisy and childishness and worked against women’s rights and gaining respect for women. It seemed more of a party for them, as if they had their rights and it didn’t look like it was the same Feminism I had wanted. Or needed Feminism the way I needed it.

    Now I just punch people in the face, Feminism, Racism, Classicism, whatever. But I would really like there to be a Feminism for women of colour. I really would.

  29. Liza wrote:

    slam dunk, LaToya – this is a fantastic post. And, from my own lens, one that very few white folks can understand. I was green with envy reading when you describe your life as one long POC party — the POC in my daily life are the ones related to me. I’m surrounded by white people — good white people, for sure. But, it’s so difficult for me to describe what you wrote above without everyone getting all up in arms and discounting the very real experience as a woman of color who is fighting for right for everyone.

    Where I work, we, too, were getting ready to build a women’s center. When I announced that I believe we must build more than just a “WHITE women’s center”, everyone immediately got very uncomfortable and said, “of course, it will be a women’s center for all women.” To which I replied, “Uh, huh. Sure.”

    anyways, great post…. definitely going to send it to others to read and get some knowledge!

  30. J. Wiley wrote:

    Maybe I’m misreading your post, LaToya, but I’m having trouble understanding it as anything other than the desire to distance yourself from what I often call a ’straw-feminist’, meaning that there are a bunch of privileged people saying things in the name of feminism that (rightfully) bother you; so, you call those things ‘feminism’ and distance yourself from that.

    I just don’t understand.

    As a black woman, I realize that the mainstream (i.e. white) feminism I often encounter doesn’t always take my experiences into account.

    …but that doesn’t make me weary of feminism qua feminism. When white, wealthy feminists spew things like the quote (“I care about racism. And classism. I just want to focus on feminism”) you shared, it makes me weary of smug whiteness and class privilege, not feminism.

    There are nasty people in every movement who refuse to examine their own privilege. Quite honestly, I think I’ve encountered more blatant mis0gyny and homophobia (both of which affect me, as a bi woman) in the hetero-male-dominated anti-racist circles I’ve worked in than I have racism in the white feminist ones; but that still doesn’t stop me from proudly identifying as a black anti-racist, nor would it lead me to say that I don’t care about anti-racism.

    Anyway, I do appreciate your questions about who our feminism is for; they’ve given me food for thought.

    Admittedly, I think my more positive attitude towards feminism owes much to my relative ease with operating in white circles where I’m the only POC – I’ve been doing it all my life. For me, walking into a room and seeing a sea of white faces was the norm until I went to college.
    For most of my life, friendships with other WOC were precious and rare; so there was a deeper bond there than I had with my white female friends that’s still there today. WOC -especially black- lives resonate with me in a way that others simply can’t.

  31. NancyP wrote:

    Esteleth and purpleshinycrafter –

    I am an urban small-city Midwesterner but grew up in the era Before Dirt, so everyone was a bit clueless about teh gay.

    One thing that today’s kids have is access to the Internet (duh), and one essential bridge for many teens would be learning alternate interpretations of Scripture and alternate theologies that don’t condemn gay people. In all likelihood, the rural teen isn’t going to have access to an affirming congregation, but there are a large number of gay Christian websites, some with general info about The Seven Scary Passages and more modern interpretations, some with monthly magazines with searchable topics and sermons (www.whosoever.org is a good one), some LGBT caucus groups of individual denominations, some livejournal and myspace groups. Teens with ability to reach a larger city might be able to talk FTF with a gay-friendly or gay pastor, either at the gay-founded denominations MCC (www.ufmcc.org), Unity Fellowship (www.unityfellowshipchurch.org/wp2008) , or The Fellowship (www.radicallyinclusive.com), the latter two being African-American-founded denominations with “traditional AA gospel style” services.

    So far as Latoya’s original post – maybe the gift that she can give that teen girl who reminds her of her homegirls is an ear to listen and a virtual forum within which the new generation may meet. Certainly I, a white “older than dirt” technologically and socially backward feminist (doesn’t even txtmsg!), would have absolutely no clue about how to make and publicize a “Self-Respecting, Can-Do Teen Girl of Color” website, facebook, podcast, a self-serve print-xerox-n-distribute ‘zine hosted on a website, or whatever, that would actually appeal to the target population and be made available to them.

    I’ll stick to health care access issues, something I have a chance of understanding.

  32. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @J.Wiley,

    I don’t need to fight straw-feminists; I have enough issues with some of the real ones. If you go back and look at my other posts on feminism (you can click the tag or run the search) I’ve given more examples of specific points where the movement (made up of people) has failed.

    I could pull examples from the blogopshere; the MSM; my real life experience; the real life experience of others – the end result is the same. It is always an uphill battle to get the movement “for all women” to recognize all women.

    My friends (my age and older) don’t look at me like I’m crazy for still talking about feminism for no reason. There is this strange common thread of non belonging that impacts all of us, and that is what I recognize.

    I suppose that my relative unease in being the one or the only comes in because I haven’t had to do it in so long. I remember a time until about 4th grade, before my districts switched. And ever since then, it’s been diversity city. I am woefully out of practice with dealing with privilege – everytime I am in one of those spaces it feels as if something is scraping on my skin.

    And the reaction I get when I talk about feminism, I think other people feel that same scrape too.

    I read a lot of blogs by sex workers – they often mention that they are renegades from feminism or lament how feminism had so much potential – and again, I think there is something fundamentally wrong with how issues are approached if so many people feel like they are also stuck on the margins.

    But anyway, I’m disgressing. I guess the bottom line on this one is I came to feminism to find a support system. I did not find the one I was looking for there. However, I want to take my tools elsewhere and build one. (I also wonder which houses Audre Lord was discussing with the master’s tools thing…does it apply to feminism? Building a house with the tools used to oppress others? Hmm, must research…)

    As atlasien and other commenters have explained, some people see feminism as a tool and some see it as an ideology and some see it as a lifestyle. I guess we all just have to figure where we fit and work from there.

    @NancyP – Funny, where I can do the most good doesn’t involve the web at all. I got involved with a foundation that helps bring girls access to leadership, creativity, and yoga. And then later, hopefully through hip-hop feminism, I want to do presentations and workshops aimed at tweens and teens.

    But I think you nailed it when you talked about health care access issues. I don’t think every single feminist has to know every single thing about everyone – but rather to specialize in your experience and keep an ear out for other perspectives. The things I care about are media justice/reform, hip-hop, sexual violence and that’s what I focus a lot of my feminism on. But someone has to talk about sex. And someone has to talk about health care access. And someone has to talk about beauty. And someone has to talk about religion. And I think it is our responsibility to listen to each other and pitch in to help get the work done – especially where there is overlap. Make sense?

    @Liza – Keep me posted on how those kinds of conversations go. I am interested to hear the thought process involved when trying to attract people to a new women’s center.

    @jvannsteppes – “Struggling with” is a good one. I may use the phrase when I discuss specialization and coalitions, which is how I think the work gets done.

    @Queen of Sheba –

    You raise good questions. I suppose the full sentence in my head would be something like “putting the movement *0ver* the wants and needs of the people it serves” as that is where my frustration stems from. (I.e., we unify for feminism but fuck your issue, take that shit to the race board). I’ll ponder the other one and get back to you.

  33. gecko wrote:

    Thanks for this post Latoya. You’ve given me a lot of really interesting things to think about

    Feminism is something that I am still exploring and thanks to the wonderful women who I have had the opportunity to interact with, it has largely been a positive experience. That being said, there have still been times when my status as the only WOC for miles around has been shoved into my face and I have felt tolkenised and shitty.

    Quite frankly, I don’t know who I am fighting for; I like to think I’m fighting for women like my mother, who were dealt a crap hand and made it work for them, and for those who couldn’t. I like to think I’m fighting for girls with dark skin and glasses who were told “I’m so glad you don’t look like those black girls on the bus with their tight jeans and big hair” and for girls who are told to let boys take care of them if they want to find a husband.

    I don’t really know though, but I’m hoping it’ll come to me

  34. Cynthia wrote:

    I should also add that university style feminism is not just Anglo and educated, but Anglo, educated and liberal to a certain extent. I knew a few (pretty much WASP) girls who didn’t like some of their “lefty law professors’ view of feminism.” And when I was in graduate school, trying to make use of the women’s centre for material on my research papers (mostly about middle class, English speaking women), I found it really difficult to find what I was looking for. I found more in the library in the form of etiquette books and in the archives than in the women’s centre!

  35. Sewere wrote:

    Not sure how best I can explain how I came to be doing what I do and why I continue to do it but here goes.

    I think it was the end of first year med school. I’m coming from my cousin’s house and it’s mad chaos at Yaba bus stop (this is right about the height of fuel scarcity during the Abacha regime). I hear a commotion behind me only to see a woman fall off a VW passenger bus and her arm get run over. I do the best I can to rig a splinter to hold her broken arm while I “tell” to go to the nearest teaching hospital. During all of this the woman’s first worries were how her family would worry about her and what they would eat that night. When she was able to calm down a bit, she looked at me sadly saying she couldn’t afford to go to the hospital because she couldn’t afford to buy all the things she would need.

    A few years after, I’m living in California working the phone bank at the county food bank giving people directions on where to pick up thanksgiving dinner, I get a call from a grandmother who tells me she just wants to give her grandkids something other than beans and she really appreciated the help.

    At this point, I figure med school is no longer what I want to do so I go into public health. During my internship in Central America, I watch as a woman is brought back home to die from a botched abortion. A year later, I’m helping a girl who couldn’t be more than 17yrs old get out of an exam room in a clinic in Kenya’s Eastern Province. She’s in a bit of a daze after being aspirated, I help her out and go back to help clean up the MVA room.

    All of these stories involve WOC the majority of whom were black. I’ve come to know women in these circumstances suffer because something in this world makes such violence possible. This thing may not have the exact same name but it has the same effects of diminishing the lives of women, particularly women of color. Even as my career moves me closer to understanding the myriad structural issues, I don’t want to forget what I’ve seen. I’m not sure it is my place to give a name to what it is I’m trying to do, all I know is that these are the people I’m fighting for, these women’s lives are my priority.

    Thanks for the thought-provoking post and apologies for the rambling.

  36. J. Wiley wrote:

    “I don’t need to fight straw-feminists; I have enough issues with some of the real ones. If you go back and look at my other posts on feminism (you can click the tag or run the search) I’ve given more examples of specific points where the movement (made up of people) has failed.

    I could pull examples from the blogopshere; the MSM; my real life experience; the real life experience of others – the end result is the same. It is always an uphill battle to get the movement “for all women” to recognize all women. ”

    I never said that these problems don’t exist within feminism. They do; I see it happen.

    I’m simply saying that I don’t see why the presence of privileged voices within feminism should be enough to make you weary of feminism qua feminism. That’s what I was referring to with the phrase ’straw-feminist’ – that the privileged voices don’t define the movement.

    When white feminists’ dismissal of you (not you in particular; ‘you’ in the general sense of ‘any person’) leads you to feel like you’re ready to stop caring about feminism, you let these women define the movement for you.

    To me, it all depends on how one defines feminism. Yes, I’m sick and tired of the pervasiveness of smug and unexamined white/class privilige among feminists, but I’m not sick and tired of feminism itself because the women who offend me don’t even come close to defining “feminism” for me.

    It’s similar to the example I gave of the homophobia and misogyny I’ve found in male-dominated anti-racist circles – these men don’t define what it is for me to be a black anti-racist; therefore, I don’t let the ignorance I’ve heard from them color my view of anti-racism.

    Do you see what I mean?

  37. Persia wrote:

    What does caring about the movement mean?

    For me, it means crafting a strong, powerful movement that dismantles the structures that oppress women (and men, too, in the long run)– all women, not just the ones in the Western world or in office buildings in Manhattan.

    Man, that point about GnR is so on target. Being a good person, a good feminist, a good…whatever the hell it is I am is about looking beyond the ‘expected’ structure– seeing what others’ needs and frustrations are and being open to their experiences.

    I think I’m fighting for myself, twenty years ago. I think I’m fighting for my lesbian friend in Malaysia. I think I’m fighting for people I barely know, and people I have yet to know.

    I’ve been working on an auction benefiting gay marriage and my husband asked me ‘why is this so important to you?’ and all I could say is, ‘because it is.’ I can’t fight all the fights; I just do one or two at a time. And I think that’s okay, because there are all these other people fighting alongside me. And their priorities may be different– often are different– but here, and other good places, I feel like we’re all part of the same struggle.

  38. Mickey wrote:

    A book on feminism from LaToya: I kan haz?

    Awesome post. Feminism is something that I’m just nowactively learning about. I’m walking this Earth as a Black woman, but only see myself as Black, never ever as a woman.

    For me feminism means not only equal pay and equal access to success, but also accepting different views of feminism (race, sexuality, etc.) and learning something from them.

    Thanks for dropping knowledge.

  39. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @J -

    “I’m simply saying that I don’t see why the presence of privileged voices within feminism should be enough to make you weary of feminism qua feminism. That’s what I was referring to with the phrase ’straw-feminist’ – that the privileged voices don’t define the movement.”

    So who does define the movement?

    While I love the whole idea of following the basic principle and chucking what doesn’t work, it’s difficult for me to do. I could say I agree with the overall mission and motives of the NAACP. But I haven’t felt much cause to support them, and their recent activities surrounding the N-word & Dunbar village continue to remind me that that spot is not the place for me to work from.

    And again, I suppose one could say that people fail in the interpretation, but I mean damn – how many circles am I going to have to walk through? How many more times do I need to go through this process to be seen as a woman? How many times do you just sit back and take it before saying “enough, I gotta do my own thing?”

    As I’ve said in other posts, I’ve had my fill of feminism. And while I have had many, many opportunities to sit and explore with it, the facts of the matter haven’t changed:

    I came to find solutions to the problems I saw being a young woman of color.

    I am not finding those solutions in feminism.

    Therefore, I need to find or create something else.

    ShadySadie linked to this post saying she could totally relate. But she’s a white woman and she cares about sex workers. And they feel marginalized as well.

    To me, it doesn’t make logical sense to have so many women from so many backgrounds come to feminism and still feel failed. Feminism is about women – and yet women feel alienated. Large swaths of women feel alienated. Which makes me think that maybe, feminism needs to rethink its tactics and approach.

    There is a lot pushed on keeping this label, but why? What is the purpose? Who does it serve?

    If you want to stay and fight to redefine feminism that’s cool. As I mentioned in other pieces, there are many women of color who find worth in doing other things. It is feminist, but they don’t call it feminism. But it benefits women, particularly the women I want to reach. That’s where I am going because to me, that’s all that matters.

    @Mickey –

    A book on feminism from LaToya: I kan haz?

    That’s the craziness of this whole situation. The less I want to deal with feminism the more I find myself writing about it. WTF? Which reminds me, I gotta finish a pitch to alternet about their crappy “Intersectional feminists are hijacking teh movementz!” thing…

  40. Tina H wrote:

    *Lurking white woman, trying to learn how to shut the hell up and learn something, prints entire thread to read on the commuter bus*

    ;-) You’re reaching folks you may not even realize.

  41. atlasien wrote:

    I feel like J. Wiley… I hold feminism to the same standards — no more, no less — as other movements I belong to or sympathize with.

    I just don’t see how some women could NOT be alienated from feminism. 51% of the earth’s population are not going to agree with each other very often. They have very different goals and some of them are exploiting the other ones.

    I really don’t get anger against feminism on a visceral level. Against some feminists, yes, but not against feminism. I can understand it logically, but nothing more. And it’s not that I trust women more… in my life, I’ve probably received more racist and sexist abuse from women than I have from men, and many of my closest friends have been men.

    Perhaps it’s that for me, feminism is a package of loosely related things, some lifestyle, some political, some aesthetic, some very abstract and theoretical. I feel free to take what has worked for me and reject the parts that don’t.

  42. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @Atlasien -

    Perhaps it’s that for me, feminism is a package of loosely related things, some lifestyle, some political, some aesthetic, some very abstract and theoretical. I feel free to take what has worked for me and reject the parts that don’t.

    For me, feminism is a hammer when I need a screwdriver.

    And I think a lot of my rage there comes from the ridiculousness of the situation. If black men are acting like assholes in a pro-black space, they don’t come after me afterwards going “Why don’t you want to be a part of our movement?” They are really fucking clear on where I can go to fuck myself if I don’t like it. I leave that movement alone, I don’t hear anything else about it.

    For feminism though, I still hear those same people expressing bafflement “why don’t we have women of color?” “why don’t *all* women identify as feminists?” Why are y’all acting like you don’t know? The carnage is everywhere! Fu-uck! If it’s going to be a white women first movement, say so! Stop with the bait and switch.

    I just hate the fact that a movement can claim to speak for me and never listen to what I say.

    And it isn’t as if I am saying anything new. This has been happening since time eternal with factions and breaks and new ideas being formed.

    If feminism serves you, great – stay with it.

    I am saying that feminism doesn’t serve me or the people I want to help. I’m not saying feminism needs to be eradicated, or changed to “humanism” or anything else like that. There are a lot of things I don’t feel an affiliation with or believe in, but they help other people – and that’s fine. Everything isn’t for me. But I can’t understand why people keep saying feminism is for everyone (or specifically, every woman) when it continues to demonstrate it is not.

  43. Radfem wrote:

    Great post, links and comments!

    If it makes sense, right now I “fight” one day at a time. Which means today it’s about trying to get a Latino guy who died in police custody the investigation by the commission that my city’s charter (passed by voters) states he’s entitled to. It should be customary but the commission which is supposed to be representing the people is balking.

    I know it’s a man and I hope feminism forgives me for that but at least there’s none locally to condemn it. Actually, I don’t care whether it does or it doesn’t approve. Even if it’s a guy, somewhere out there a woman cares about him. And often it’s the mothers, wives and sisters and aunts who fight the hardest in cases like these for justice.

    Everyone’s interconnected.

  44. queerhapa wrote:

    I think one problem is seeing “feminism” as one monolithic movement or ideology, rather than “feminisms,” plural. There have always been diverse feminisms: cultural feminism, liberal feminism, radical feminism, black feminism, marxist feminism, postmodern feminism, etc. have all had distinct constituencies, tactics, organizations, goals, and issues. Just because I disagree with several types of feminism, and fail to see myself included among the more mainstream brands, and had to quit working for certain feminist organizations in order to save my sanity, does not mean I’m going to disidentify as a feminist. I’m not a liberal feminist, that’s for sure, but I sure as hell still identify with feminists of color such as Angela Davis, Beth Richie, Andy Smith, and Kimberle Crenshaw.

    I hear what you’re saying Latoya, and I think I understand where you’re coming from, but I’m with J. Wiley and atlasien here. Feminism is *my* movement too. When people talk about feminism as if it’s a movement for white middle-class women only, it makes me incredibly sad because it seems to be ignoring the millions of women of color, working-class women, immigrant women worldwide who consider themselves to be part of this movement.

  45. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    I was going to draw an analogy about media justice and media reform, where some people believe that by fighting within the media for proper representation, we can fix the issues and some believe the media system needs to be gutted and replaced for justice to happen.

    And I was going to say that some of us seem like we are feminist reformists and some of us are looking for feminist justice.

    But then BFP said it for me, and compared Audre Lorde & Andrea Smith to boot:

    Which leads me to the point that I think that ultimately, even as Lorde centered black women and women of color in everything she did, she was still much more optimistic about the possibility of ‘change’ when it comes to white women than Smith is (which is not to imply that Smith is not optimistic about engaging with white women, but rather than she certainly doesn’t find it as productive as organizing and working with other women of color).

    And again, here is the crux of my major blogging problems at the moment. I’ve seen with my own two eyes right on this blog exactly how productive conversations with white women can be. I’ve seen incredible love and support and questions and challenges and answers and gotten insane amounts of help from white women.

    I’ve also seen right on this blog (and in blog land in general) exactly how unproductive conversations with white women can be. I mean, how many times will radical women of color organizers be called “intersectionalists” before somebody finally figures it out?

    I suppose, instead of fixing feminism, I want to attack the problems that brought me to feminism in the first place.

  46. harrietsdaughter wrote:

    Thank you so much for this post… for the digging down way deep and for the reminder (along with all the others you link to) that we are not only fighting for ourselves. bfp’s post on anger is making me think again about the purpose of anger and activism, and how we need to be mindful of using anger to fuel the work that we need to do on behalf of our daughters, our sisters, our homegirls. I find that I need all of the words my sisters write like I need water.

    I envy the primary PoC space that you occupy, and I know like the back of my hand how exhausting white space is. So when you write that you stay in these spaces to catch the people who are disillusioned, I thank you for that and hope that in my moments of strength I can do that for others.

    Thanks again for the post.

  47. tanglad wrote:

    Latoya @ 45 — “I suppose, instead of fixing feminism, I want to attack the problems that brought me to feminism in the first place.”

    Wow. I think my growing unease is this realization, that feminism (both the mainstream movement and the canonical theories) is not addressing the needs of the marginalized women I care about. Not only that. Many of the development strategies promoted by groups that identify as feminists (like capacity-building shit, microfinance, etc) further entrench poverty under the guise of “uplifting” poor women. For almost two decades, I’ve been deeply invested in feminism as my main framework for action. But there obviously needs to be different, more responsive ways of understanding and acting. And I don’t know where to go with this yet.

    And even with the realization that mainstreamers may not view me as an ally to feminism anymore, it feels like a personal loss to me. The only other time when I felt like this was when I decided to leave my church.

  48. Sarah J wrote:

    For me, I don’t ever see it as about “the movement,” I do see it as about the people in front of me who are getting hurt.

    I see people talking about “the movement” the same way I see people talking about “the relationship”–as though it’s this thing outside of themselves that has to be supported, this beast that must be fed and loved and petted or it’ll go up in smoke.

    A relationship is something that happens between people. There’s just people, no other entity there.

    The movement is the same thing to me. It’s not an entity that exists outside of people. It’s not a corporation that we’re shareholders of. It’s people. We didn’t take a vote on which issues matter to “all women” because that would be impossible. We just have to do the best we can.

    And I think you do, whether you’re talking explicitly about feminism or about other things that your feminism informs.

  49. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    @Tanglad – please, tell me more about microfinance.

    @harrietsdaughter & Liza – I am interested in why you used the word envy when discussing my PoC filled space. Why is that? Is it something that is unattainable in your area?

    @zack – yes, coalition building. I’ll get at that in another post.

    @Keren – That’s interesting, I get mixed reports out of Britain with regards to women of color. I second the call for anyone with that experience to speak up.

    @drea – Yes, I feel you on the “time of day comment.”

    @mislyddie –

    I think the better question to ask instead of “am I being racist” is “am I doing something that will lend needed help?” or “Am I using my privilege to fight in spaces it would be difficult for these women to access, and then making room on my soapboxes for their voices?” or “Am I focusing on what I can do at home as well as abroad?” Everyone is given different tools for a reason.

  50. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    I am pulling part of this comment from BFP’s blog:

    J.

    Thank you for opening this post. My experiences with “feminism” remind me of a dysfunctional relationship on its last legs. How many times have I, you, and other women of color had these same unproductive conversations with “feminists”? How many times must you feel that you are being pushed out of space before you just decide to leave? I am frustrated, I am angry, and I feel as though I am banging my head head repeatedly against the same stupid wall. So why do I keep engaging? Why don’t I just leave? For me, I think it’s because I am inspired by powerful women, smart women, strong women, assertive women, struggling women, unappreciated women. Women have always dominated my black family. By societal standards, I was raised by a “single” mother. By my own standards, I was raised by my mother, grandmothers, aunts, and the women in my neighborhood and church. They wouldn’t describe themselves as feminists; they were just doing what they had to do. When I got to college, feminism was about recognizing their strength, and finding my own. My definition of feminism is women supporting each other. It’s hard for me to walk away from any group that claims to do that, no matter how flawed it is.

  51. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Oh, and Atlasien, queerhapa, J. Wiley –

    I know I am pushing back hard, but my intention isn’t to make you feel hostile or unwelcomed. I hope that is not the perception you are getting. I am actually really happy these kind of hashing out conversations are happening.

    It’s these kinds of conversations – and the differing views, and the impassioned defenses of feminism and the equally impassioned reasons for wanting to leave – give me strength when I do step into those places.

    So, thank you all who participated on this thread. I really do appreciate your words.

  52. atlasien wrote:

    I don’t mind it either. What really bothers me is not when people reject feminism as an organized movement or name… it’s when they reject the basic goal of feminism or its right to exist. That’s when I feel personally attacked, and the stereotypes start coming in. E.g. women who identify with feminism must be weak, because strong women don’t need feminism. Feminism poisons women against men. Feminism causes women to fall into poverty because it encourages them to not rely on men. Those kinds of criticisms are practically everywhere and it’s so depressing to try and dispel them. And that’s not even getting into the specific difficulties of how in some circles, the name “Asian-American feminist” automatically equals “race traitor”.

  53. queerhapa wrote:

    Thanks Latoya. I totally respect your opinion and the conversations you start and develop here. And I feel your frustrations. After way too many bad experiences, I vowed long ago not to work with mainstream white feminist orgs in order to focus on working with other WOC and QPOC. It’s something I still struggle over.

    I’m not as familiar with the whole blogosphere dust-up around these issues, but conversations have been going on elsewhere for a while now. For example, here’s a link to this In These Times article from 2004 about young WOC’s relationships to feminism that I was interviewed for and have a few quotes in. (Although hah! You don’t know my real name! No matter.) I think it will resonate with many of those commenting here.

    http://www.inthesetimes.com/comments.php?id=703_0_1_0_C

  54. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    QH –

    Thanks for the link. The article was great to read. (And now I’m going to keep trying to guess who you are!)

    But omigod – that right there in the comments! The same thing we are talking about now! Some days I really feel like one step forward is one step back.

  55. tanglad wrote:

    From Latoya — “please, tell me more about microfinance.”

    I’ll try to give a short answer.

    Microfinance programs depend largely on microcredit loans, given to “poor” people in developing countries (majority of recipients are women) as capital so they can start livelihood programs and attain financial self-sufficience. Then the loans are paid back. The most famous model is the Grameen Bank.

    It’s a nice idea, but there are major problems with this approach, including the following:

    – It’s a top-down approach, often instituted in line with development strategies imposed by the World Bank. No consultation from the community as to what they need. No consideration of how the gender dynamics in the communities can affect the women’s decision-making processes in the businesses. The sole focus is access to credit.

    –In one case I’m familiar with, a group of indigenous women in the northern Philippines were given microcredit loans to set up craftwork businesses. But only a few women benefitted (those w/ entrepreneurial experience), and those who did were not the “poor.” Many women fell behind in their loan payments, and the program did not establish any collective agency among the women.

    –Income from these livelihood programs often gives a skewed picture of any net gains from microfinance. There have been cases where women take on additional loans to pay for their microfinance loans. Women have also reported cutting back on family expenses (not buying schoolbooks and supplies, putting off health clinic visits, eating less, ) to make their loan payments. So these are hidden costs that are not factored when economists measure the “success” of microfinance schemes.

    –Microfinance is used as a smokescreen. It obfuscates the role of “development agencies” like the WB in creating these conditions of poverty by making it look like they’re doing development work. And this success is measured in terms of “income,” ignoring social costs such as health, displacement from communities, etc

    (disclaimer: All the points above are based on readings, not my own primary research. I don’t have access to the research now, but anyone who wants citation info can e-mail me and I can send detailed citations. )

    In many countries in Southeast Asia, microfinance schemes and capacity-building programs are the cornerstone of devt strategies for women. Neoliberal schemes not only further disempower women but also placate any resistance (because it seems like the programs are helping women). And it’s really frustrating to me that many feminist groups like UNIFEM and other NGOs in the Philippines, for example, often present microcredit as a long-term solution rather than a stopgap.

    Well, so much for a short answer.

  56. Lhasaluck wrote:

    “my life is generally one long PoC party”

    Thanks for hanging out in the feminist blogosphere. I fight so I can be invited to the party.

  57. Slush wrote:

    Re: Microfinance

    I have a happier picture to draw, although it doesn’t necessarily contradict Tanglad, and it could also be a factor of kool-aid from visiting the Grameen Bank and having them show me how they work.

    Microfinance was started in Bangladesh by Yunus who won the Nobel a year ago or so. His model is the Grameen Bank, which I think is the most important and successful form in terms of real empowerment and poverty alleviation. Things that development banks or the WB do that they call microfinance are a travesty of Grameen.

    The core difference is ideology and goal: Yunus has patience, cultural understanding, very hard and conscious work, and low-payoffs underlying his model. Grameen is also about constantly refocusing on the poorest and making sure that help is accessible to them. If you don’t work really hard on that, it won’t happen, because other people slightly higher up the ladder have more resources and will grab the opportunities. Focusing on the very poorest is Grameen’s goal, and even they have a hard time keeping up with it.

    But this issue of targeting, and making micro-finance an anti-poverty program, rather than a national development program, really got lost in translation in a lot of places. The WB and other big development banks have cranky investors calling their shots and have more obligation to turn out specific results – social and financial – than Grameen does. And they put less time, cultural familiarity, and effort into it, so they tend to lend to people who are low risk and initially wealthier, which is exactly what Grameen does not. Grameen is an intensive social program that teaches high risk borrowers how to do it themselves and succeed, and the staff works really hard with them in times of trouble.

    People I met who worked for Grameen were awesome, so I have somewhat rose-colored glasses about it. It’s by no means perfect, and it’s also pretty top-down and male dominated, even though 93% of their borrowers are women. But it’s Bangladesh. The fact that they even loaned money to women at all was a total revolution. And at this point they do have a growing number of entry and senior staff who are female.

  58. Slush wrote:

    Oh, also – a great book about microfinance is Yunus’ “Banker to the Poor” which tells about how he got the idea and launched Grameen, and how it works. It’s a pretty easy read, autobiographical and really inspiring if you are interested in international development. It’s got kind of a slow beginning with him in college in the US or something, but the rest is tremendously fascinating.

  59. Elena Perez wrote:

    I just wrote a post on this topic over at the California NOW blog: http://www.canow.org/canoworg/2008/07/i-was-going-to.html

    As a WOC who is often perceived as white, working in the feminist community, I see this from a lot of different angles. Thanks for keeping the conversation going.

  60. JM wrote:

    Further on the flaws of microfinance – interest rates can be 30%-70% a year see here for source. I’ve actually heard figures as high as 100%.

    There are good reasons why the rates are so high (usually, that’s how much it costs to actually provide the infrastructure to make the loan possible), but it does raise issues – for example, what’s the difference between a microfinancier and a loan shark?

    Also, microfinance that goes to women tends to be smaller loans, and smaller amounts of money mean higher costs and thus higher interest rates.

  61. Slush wrote:

    But one reason microfinance took off so incredibly was because Grameen had much higher repayment rates than any other normal commercial banks. This is because they’re a social service, not just a money lender, so they work individually with people to help them solve problems, rather than just foreclose on their houses. Also, the loans are small because they are scaled to the community and the client who is receiving them. That’s the whole idea is that small loans are as important as big ones.

    There’s a lot of hype about interest rates on Microfinance and you can get all kinds of answers. I never heard of a 100% interest loan except from moneylenders, who are generally the only other credit resource in poor communities, and the model on which Grameen was trying to improve.

  62. waxghost wrote:

    Amazing post, Latoya. Enlightening and at the same time unifying for me. You and Brownfemipower have articulated a lot of things about feminism that I couldn’t put into words myself.

    I may be too late in asking this question but I couldn’t help thinking about what a Native American guy I know said to me recently. We were talking about ways that he was trying to improve life for his tribes, but he said that he didn’t believe that an outsider could necessarily help. His analogy was that Native Americans are like penguins in a zoo; if you break the glass and let them out, you haven’t actually improved their situation. Ultimately, he concluded that the improvements had to come from within the tribes because no one but them knew what they needed or could come up with solutions that wouldn’t have some unexpected side effect. I wonder what everyone here thinks of this… (Maybe I should actually make this into an article?)

  63. therationalist wrote:

    How to count gains gotten through activist efforts, the gold coin analogy. Think there are 4 people, a white couple (of both sexes) and a colored couple. There are 40 gold coins in a heap. Each person is asked to pick equal number of coins, in a fair system it would be 10 each. They all take 10 coins initially. Now due to male privelege, both the colored male and the white male take, 5 coins each from the females of their corresponding race respectively. Now the score is white male,15,colored male,15,white female,5,colored female 5. Due to white privelege, the white male takes 5 coins from the colored male and the white female takes 5 coins from the colored female. With sexism and racism, total scores will be white male, 20, white female 10, colored male 10, colored female 0. This is considering sexism and racism incur the same equal proportion of gains and losses(5 points in the analogy). If we eliminate racism, the scores would be, white male,15,colored male 15,white female 5,colored female 5 whereas if we eliminate sexism, the scores would be, white male 15, white female 15, colored male 5, colored female 5. If just one sexism or racism were to disappear and the other remained., the colored female stands at the same point, of course here the assumption is that both sexism and racism cause equal losses. However in terms of social power and wealth and effects of institutional bias, it seems likely that more gold coins are taken away for racism than sexism.

  64. Davita Cuttita wrote:

    I’m not feminist. But…

    What I fight for is for those who cannot fight for themselves.

    What I fight for is the truth.

    What I fight for is justice.

    I fight through my hope and intelligence.

    For everybody. That’s it.

  65. yellowwallpaper wrote:

    Thanks so much for this post it’s given me a lot to think about.

    I also plan on using the term POC party all the time now because I realized that my whole life is a total queer POC party and how lucky I am that it is!