links for 2008-06-10

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Comments

  1. DEAF FEMINIST PUNK!! wrote:

    Re: the Oregon KKK article:

    I cannot believe that there are still racist assholes who burn crosses in people’s front yards. What is this, the 1950s????

    Fuck the KKK, i hope they all go kill themselves.

  2. kjen wrote:

    I started to groan as soon as I saw the teaser, “He hoped to promote understanding, break stereotypes and perhaps even provide a comedic…”
    And the ‘Meet the Black Guy” booth wasn’t as foolish as I thought, I still don’t like the ‘Black exotic’ on display connotations. Intended lesson on diversity or not.

  3. Fatemeh wrote:

    Wow. I am pretty embarrassed to live in Oregon right now.

    Oregon is a very white state, especially in the eastern parts. The state hs a pretty racist history, too, which miscegenation laws and discriminatory housing policies (these are not ancient history, either).

    And politics are very white, too: “liberal” in Oregon really just means liberal on environmental conservation and marijuanna laws, with a little bit of pro-choice thrown in. Racial activism and immigration isn’t in the mix here.

    This doesn’t excuse the behavior, but I’m trying to help paint a picture of what it’s like to live in Oregon and the culture that these news stories arise from.

  4. Elton wrote:

    Re: Optional SATs

    I have mixed feelings about how effective this will be towards fighting inequality in college admissions. Standardized tests are inherently artificial measures that have little to do with “the real world.” However, since they are standardized–meaning that anyone from anywhere can pick up a study guide in a public library and study for them regardless of the quality of their high school–they give students of high academic potential from disadvantaged backgrounds an equalizing factor in their applications.

    I can’t cite studies, but in my personal experience, first-generation college students of color, particularly second-generation Asian-Americans, are enabled, not hindered, by the SAT and ACT to achieve admission to colleges and universities their parents never dreamed of.

    In lieu of standardized test scores, admissions committees are no doubt going to turn to factors such as extracurricular activities, which are–for better or worse–not standardized. I fear that kids with the privilege of a wide range of after-school activities will supersede kids from working-class immigrant families whose hopes will be placed on a standardized test that everyone is supposed to have a fair chance to do well on.