The brown and the dead: CNN’s Myanmar coverage

by Guest Contributor Tami, originally published at What Tami Said

Does this woman’s body deserve respect?

Saturday night I was watching as CNN covered the tragedy in Myanmar (Burma). I was well aware of the devastation caused by Nagris, the cyclone that ripped the country apart. What shocked me was the graphic nature of CNN’s report. There were bodies and bodies and more bodies–Burmese men, women, even children, dead, bloated, discolored and rotting in the Southeast Asian sun; arms and legs akimbo as if their owners had been tossed like rag dolls. I know this is what death looks like, especially when it takes place in a poor country where the people have been colonized, militarized and rocked by ethnic strife and drug trafficking. But I watched the television and couldn’t help thinking that this video desecration of the already desecrated was another example of how American culture sees brown people as somehow less human.

According to the Huffington Post, a CNN spokesperson, defending the news outlet’s work in Burma, said “the enormity of the story” merited showing corpses. What are the chances that CNN will show the broken bodies of the 22 people killed in twisters that plowed across the central United States this weekend, y’know so we get “the enormity of the story?” We did not need to see graphic footage of victims to understand the enormity of Oklahoma City or 9/11. I do remember seeing some footage of the dead in Katrina–not as graphic as the Myanmar coverage–but we all know those folks weren’t American anyway, they were “refugees.” (Tongue firmly in cheek, here.)

This is the same bias that allows a magazine that would never show a naked American woman, to show an unclothed African woman. In our puritanical culture, where we are obsessed with, yet repulsed by, the bodies of the living and the dead, why do we reserve our concern only for those who look like us?

View a short clip of CNN’s Burma coverage at Huffington Post. What do you think?
Image courtesy of exfordy on Flickr.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Minority Report / Stereohyped on 14 May 2008 at 12:12 pm

    [...] • How can we interpret the U.S. media’s lack of hesitation in showing the dead bodies of non-Americans (or Katrina victims)? [Racialious] [...]

  2. Earthquake in China on 15 May 2008 at 1:12 pm

    [...] up after Katrina.  Also, for the most part, the bodies are covered respectfully.  I read a good point about how images of white Europeans and American bodies are treated differently after disasters [...]

  3. Natural Disaster Coverage and Race « Real Media Ethics on 24 Jun 2008 at 10:12 am

    [...] Disaster, Race | A big question about the coverage of Cyclone Nargis was raised for me from this post by Tami at Racialicious (it was originally posted at What Tami Said). Tami describes her own [...]

Comments

  1. j wrote:

    Not only are brown people reduced to bodies in this imagery but they are portrayed as a nameless, anonymous mass as well. I find that these kind of images just continue to reinforce the idea of brown and black peoples of the world as randoms others, nameless backdrops whose faces we only see when there is some disaster, natural of human-made. Thanks for posting this. I’m glad I’m not the only one disgusted by this.

    And yes, the US media wouldn’t dare show white American bodies in this manner .

  2. Erica B. wrote:

    Up to a hundred thousand casualties is more enormous than twenty-two. The fact I hope they meant to convey is that corpses are too numerous to be attended to, which indicates that the cleanup and recovery efforts are likely overwhelmed — meaning other fundamental functions of a society (such as food, shelter, protection of weak/helpless people like children) are probably breaking down as well.

    I have not, however, actually seen the video; we can’t watch it from work. I’m stuck with wishing they did it respectfully instead of sensationally.

  3. Sarah J wrote:

    I do find this troubling, because I’m one of the people angered by the fact that we don’t show pictures of coffins returning home from Iraq, or really any footage of Iraq at all anymore.

    And yet we can show dead bodies of people when it’s not our fault, perhaps? When there’s no blame to be affixed and once again we can point to them and say “look what happens in other countries”? Or, yes, when they are assumed to not look like “us.”

    I wonder if there is a way to do this respectfully or if that’s just impossible with the kind of spectator media we’ve got now. Because I do think sometimes people need to see these things as they need to see graphic footage of war–as they did during Vietnam, when unembedded journalists brought home pictures and stories that turned the country against the war. But not as porn, for sure.

  4. Rob wrote:

    Reminds me of why someone asked the Western media why we didn’t get to see the floating bloated bodies of white people in New Orleans after hurricane Katrina.

  5. Aaminah wrote:

    Hmm… interesting. It reminds me that these people who are so quick to show the bloated corpses of the Burmese are the very same people who speak out so vehmenantly about Palestinians who show the photos of their dead children etc as being “sensationalism” and tacky, when the Palestinians are just trying to get people to realize that they are human beings and are being killed in horrific ways.

    I am agreeing with your questions Tami, and assessment, but also noticing another hypocrisy at play by the media.

  6. kiki wrote:

    And yet we can show dead bodies of people when it’s not our fault, perhaps?

    Except that scientists are beginning to prove that we are at least partially at fault. Pollution that we create has led to a global dimming phenomenon that affects the hydrologic cycle on earth leading to droughts in Africa and Cyclones in Asia.

  7. atlasien wrote:

    I think this is a really complicated issue, partly because the taboo against showing dead bodies is really strong in America, and it’s also a very unexamined taboo.

    In Mexico, for example, dead bodies — victims of car crashes — are regularly shown in newspapers. And I happened to be in Mexico City when the drug lord Amado Carrillo was discovered dead on the plastic surgery table. Graphic photos of his two-week old corpse took up the front page of every newspaper on every newsstand.

    I don’t think Mexico is an exception… I think it’s more that the U.S. is an exception (is there a similar taboo in the UK?).

    Race definitely plays into it here…

    The rules of which dead bodies should be viewable, and under what circumstances, are largely unspoken.

  8. Amanda wrote:

    Great example, atlasien. I was going to say the same thing, but add that I was in Mexico when Katrina hit, and saw how Mexican Red Cross workers were not allowed into New Orleans as emergency relief workers, due to immigration policy. I immediately thought of this when the Myanmar (Burma) story broke. Also, interestingly, while in Mexico, I saw some of the most graphic footage of Iraq, things that in the USA we are not privy to. The logic of publicizing some photos (these poor 3rd worlders–and they won’t even let us help!) and not others (oops! this violence is our fault!) is truly disturbing.

  9. thesciencegirl wrote:

    I watched half the video and had to turn it off. But I got the gist. And I think CNN knows exactly what it’s doing: being sensationalist, getting good ratings, and completely removing themselves and their viewers from seeing the people of Myanmar as equals. The media coverage of international disasters sickens me. I was planning on e-mailing Latoya today to ask that we address the news coverage of the cyclone and the earthquake in China as well. Another trend that I find really disturbing is when the American reporters harp on the handful of U.S. citizens reported to be in the region of a disaster because of course, those white lives are more important than the hundreds of thousands of brown people affected. I noticed this during the tsunami too. I kept seeing interviews with American tourists who were vacationing instead of the locals who had lost absolutely everything. It’s just another example of how certain lives are valued.

    I’m really horrified about that video being shown.

  10. Tiffany wrote:

    Anyone who is non white are always reduced to being less than human.

  11. RKC wrote:

    Hi,

    First I want to say I enjoy reading your blog as I find it very informative and thought-provoking regarding issues dealing with race.

    With that said I’d just like to express my surprise at finding out that American mainstream media is not forbidden from displaying images of the dead. I thought these displays were absolutely forbidden after the Vietnam War. Now I realize their hidden agenda, which is to only forbid the viewing of dead bodies that are a result of wars and conflicts America involves itself in. However, I do think they sometimes make exceptions over not showing dead American bodies. Didn’t they show the burnt and mutilated bodies of American contractors in Iraq once? The purpose was to upset Americans so that they would further support the Iraq invasion. So I guess I’m trying to state that the media’s showing of dead bodies is done deliberately and with a clear purpose in mind.

  12. Abu Sinan wrote:

    I guess I take it from a different angle. I wish our media showed MORE bodies from all peoples.

    That might sound wierd, but would Americans support the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan if they could see the body parts of women and children scattered for a 20 metre radius after an American bomb is dropped? Would they support the war if they could see the American dead, body parts everywhere, after they hit a IED?

    It is VERY easy to support a war when you do not see what your tax money is doing. On the other side, it is VERY easy not to donate time and money when you do not see what happened to those hit by cyclones and earthquakes!

    I watch Arabic news and European news and they tend to show bodies and the aftermath of these events. I think it makes the people’s more aware of what is going on.

  13. Fatemeh wrote:

    OHMYGAWD. Great point: “This is the same bias that allows a magazine that would never show a naked American woman, to show an unclothed African woman. In our puritanical culture, where we are obsessed with, yet repulsed by, the bodies of the living and the dead, why do we reserve our concern only for those who look like us?”

  14. Sulyp wrote:

    I think Tiffany hit it dead on the nail.

    [quote]This is the same bias that allows a magazine that would never show a naked American woman, to show an unclothed African woman. In our puritanical culture, where we are obsessed with, yet repulsed by, the bodies of the living and the dead, why do we reserve our concern only for those who look like us?[/quote]

    And just who is “us”, exactly?

    As far as my eyes and memory tell me, the bodies of WoC (both in the US and abroad) have [i]always[/i] been displayed publicly under a different set of journalistic rules. With the wars going on in the Balkans a while ago, we never saw pictures of dead and dying people. Yet, in Sierra Leon everytime they want to talk about the diamond trade, somehow they are able to get human beings (women and children, no less), half naked, in a curiously neat lineup to display missing limbs.

    I am seeing a theme here. And that recurrence over and over again seems to have written itself in the Western psyche:

    Brown people (South Asian, African, South American, and whereever else), all over the world, suffer. Brown people couldn’t possibly live in peace and happiness. Brown people are always involved in catastrophes. Brown people aren’t capable of having a clean, and orderly society like the “civilized West”. {Inserting imaginary rolling eyes emoticon right >>>HERE<<<}

  15. kiki wrote:

    Not only are brown people reduced to bodies in this imagery but they are portrayed as a nameless, anonymous mass as well. I find that these kind of images just continue to reinforce the idea of brown and black peoples of the world as randoms others…

    A similar point was also brought up during the debate surrounding the racist imagery in Amanda Marcotte’s book. I lost count of the number of whites who commented that they just didn’t even notice the “natives” in those drawings or if they did it didn’t really register that they were human beings. This was amplified by the insistence of Marcotte supporters that those figures should not be viewed as people but as generic representations of various fears or outlooks. PoC become nothing more than elements in a landscape or faceless props in dramas/fantasies. My abuelo says that when he was a boy many businesses in his town had a sign on the door that read, “No dogs or Mexicans allowed” only people I guess.

  16. Celeste wrote:

    As someone who has personally seen what happens to human bodies I couldn’t agree more with Abu Sinan. Some people need to see the ugly visceral truth of violence in order to make it real for them. Blown up babies and children are not a pleasant picture but we need to equate the things we do in the world and our policies with these ugly pictures. Perhaps if we made that connection, the next time some war/fear monger ins speaking we will imagine dismembered civilians instead of thinking only of ourselves and what will kepp us “safe”. In all seriousness, that’s the way I think about things. You don’t even want to know what kind of groteque image came to my mind when Condi had the nerve to describe what was going on after we invaded as the “birthpains of democracy”.

  17. Bronze Trinity wrote:

    I don’t think the media views brown and black people as really being people. Its easy for them to degrade and treat these people inhumanely if they think the people are beneath them.

  18. Christina wrote:

    I have LONG noticed this trend by US media of disregard towards people of color in general, when it comes to this issue of displaying corpses. You are NOT ALONE Guest Contributor Tami, I’ve noticed as well, thank you for not pretending like it doesn’t happen, or that it’s not a disrespectful act.

  19. Persia wrote:

    I don’t know how I feel about this– I am absolutely sure there is a double standard, but I’m not sure what I want the standard to be. Should we present everyone the same dignity? Or should the reality of the situation be what we want to show– especially important in Iraq and after Katrina where people’s actions were directly responsible for the deaths.

  20. Safiya Outlines wrote:

    Yes I have noticed that dead non whites are shown all over, but for dead white people, their privacy must be respected.

    Today on the BBC, I saw the moment when a mother in China identifed her daughter’s body. I felt that footage was grossly intrusive. Remember, this is the same media organisation that agreed not to shoot close up footage of any of the Royal family’s faces during Princess Diana’s funeral.

    While I believe that graphic footage does have a high impact, I think that eventually, people become inurred to it and it loses it’s power. Iraqis and Palestinians die because they are othered and not viewed as fully human in life, denying dignity to their corpse just continues that treatment.

  21. Torontonian wrote:

    This is the same bias that allows a magazine that would never show a naked American woman, to show an unclothed African woman.

    Yes! I am very annoyed at those Fruits & Passion stores that have a huge mural showing a topless brown woman. If they showed a topless white women, it would be considered pornography. But I guess the idea is that brown women are not people and are close to nature; it’s perceived as showing animals in their natural habitat.

  22. jvansteppes wrote:

    Sciencegirl you hit it on the nail with your point about westerners on the news during that tsunami. I’m sure there’s some white lady in myanmar somewhere just waiting to tell her story to CNN.
    When it comes to race and death in the news there’s also that [possibly written?] rule that 1 white person equals 3 POC americans equals 100 people in china etc…

  23. Lyonside wrote:

    >Today on the BBC, I saw the moment when a mother in China identifed her daughter’s body.

    What makes a difference to me is permission. Did the mother know the BBC/media were there, did she care, did she ignore them, did she invite them in?

    NPR coincidently has several reporters on the ground – they were supposed to be conducting interviews for a series in June, when the earthquake hit. Given, this is radio, not TV. But through them I’ve been hearing first person accounts, and the tragedy is coming across quite vicerally through people’s voices even before the translation. Last night, a couple looking for their parents and child allowed a NPR reporter to follow and record them for a day as they tried to get equipment to the rubble of their former apartment, and it didn’t end well. I was sobbing on the way home just listening to the mother’s voice. Out of her intense grief, a tiny piece of it is now mine, mother to mother. I didn’t think what I was listening to was exploitative, but something communal.

    In the cases of the anonymous dead, they have no voice and cannot give permission. If the point of showing them is to show the scale and extent of devastation and violence, to inspire action, and not some kind of freak show or theater of the grotesque, then I can see the point. But yes, people can get “used” to it, and quite literally lump people together and dismiss it, especially if it helps the viewer avoid guilt. But when individual people and their stories are shown, I think this is far more effective and harder to dismiss.

    I’m thinking of the iconic picture from the Oklahoma city bombing – of the deceased toddler in the fireman’s arms. Given, a white infant (not sure about the firefighter), but that made the front pages of every paper nationally and quite a few internationally, I bet. I don’t know if the child was initally identified (she was later), or if the AP got permission first. My hunch is no, since it was used so quickly and so often. But it told the story effectively and brought the tragedy home. Doesn’t make it right, per se, but a little understandable.

  24. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Lyonside,

    I heard the same report. I am not a mother as of yet, but it was too painful for me to listen to all the way to the end.

    Did NPR mention anything on how to help?

  25. Lyonside wrote:

    >Did NPR mention anything on how to help?

    NPR has been saying off and on that China is accepting donations (maybe through the International Red Cross? and also directly from other nations), but not equipment or supplies, as much of what could be sent long-distance (tents, portable stoves, etc.) is produced on mainland China.

  26. Persia wrote:

    Last night, a couple looking for their parents and child allowed a NPR reporter to follow and record them for a day as they tried to get equipment to the rubble of their former apartment, and it didn’t end well. I was sobbing on the way home just listening to the mother’s voice. Out of her intense grief, a tiny piece of it is now mine, mother to mother. I didn’t think what I was listening to was exploitative, but something communal.

    I heard that too. I think the reporter on the ground also added to that– there were clearly moments when she was close to tears. This morning I found myself worried for her emotional state.

    I also heard on NPR this morning that China is calling for equipment– even simple stuff like hammers and shovels– but I’m not sure where/how to donate.

  27. Persia wrote:

    To clarify: to donate equipment. Red Cross/Red Crescent is obviously on the ground there, I’m not sure about Doctors Without Borders, which is usually my choice.

  28. locked wrote:

    I don’t agree. CNN actually aired two different clips (well that’s what I am aware of) of dead bodies concerning Myanmar. Though each one was graphic, as a person of color I did not feel that it was wrong or degrading of them to do so.

    I mean, let’s really look at the whole picture when it comes to the media (both news and non news).

    How many of you have seen one of those “wild cop moments” where they actually SHOW someone being MURDERED ? I have.

    Years ago there was a reality tv show following a family that directed a funeral home, from my memory they showed dead bodies.

    Oh, and let’s not forget my favorite late night t.v. show “The First 48″ on A&E. Dead bodies are often shown. White, black, latino, etc… and overwhelmingly American.

    I’ve seen dead bodies on t.v. before, and some of them have been white.

    Also, you talk about the enormity of the story.

    Well the fact that this story deals with a government that is accepting limited aid because of their ego, really adds to it. If CNN has to show dead bodies to get a trickle effect that will eventually make this government WAKE UP, then I say, “Good!”

  29. ph2072 wrote:

    The hypocrisy of this country disgusts and fascinates me.

  30. TheLadyoftheHouse wrote:

    Oh my goodness, thank you for posting this. This has been something I have been puzzled about for years and years. There is no rhyme or reason to it whatsoever. Somebody is killed in this country, we see only a lump covered in a sheet. Elsewhere, we see bodies, body parts, disturbing images. Your top photo is powerful as it reminds us that those dead were, naturally, living just prior.