Link Love – PoC in SciFi Carnival #9 – What I Heard About You and What it Meant For Me

by Latoya Peterson

I am really starting to become a fan of these Live Journal carnivals. The PoC in SciFi Carnival 9 is out and here are my two favorite pieces.

Untrue-Accounts provides a ridiculously great analysis of race, sex, and gender in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. And it comes with a video!

1. The story of the coat

I had the line “It’s Nikki Wood’s fucking coat” long before I had a song or a vidder or a title.

Spike wears the long black duster from his first appearance on Buffy, but we only find out its history in S5’s “Fool for Love.” Spike relates his history to Buffy (in, it’s strongly implied, somewhat unreliable terms) and the viewers see how he came to adopt his Johnny Rotten persona in a series of flashbacks. Spike starts out as a young aesthete in Victorian London; after his romantic overture is rejected by the woman he’s in love with, he accepts vamping by Drusilla. Once turned, he adopts a tough, lower-class persona, which reaches full expression once he kills a Slayer during the Boxer Rebellion and literally consummates his triumph by sex with Dru over the Slayer’s corpse. Two of Spike’s physical identifiers — the scar through one eyebrow and the coat he wears — are souvenirs of the Slayers he’s fought and killed: the Chinese Slayer slashes his face during their final battle and he steals the coat off the body of a black Slayer in the ’70s subways of New York after he kills her. Spike responds, ultimately, to rejection by a woman by the murder of other women and by stealing their identifiers–their identities, their stories–for his own.

Even in “Fool for Love,” it’s clear that Spike misunderstands the Slayers he’s fought as he misunderstands Buffy: he thinks that the Slayers’ lives and thoughts center on him, that they are as obsessed with his Romantic conflation of sex and death as he is. He argues that they died because they didn’t want to live enough; he argues that Slayers are as in love with death as he is. The Chinese Slayer tells him in Chinese, “Tell my mother I died well,” before she dies, but Spike’s only response is: “Sorry, love, I don’t speak Chinee.” Her mother is unimaginable to him, as the son of the black Slayer–Nikki Wood–is also unimaginable. Spike subordinates the stories of these women of color to his own story; he literally cannot understand the Chinese Slayer when she speaks in her own language of her own concerns.

When Robin Wood confronts Spike in S7’s “Lies My Parents Told Me,” fighting him in revenge for Nikki’s death, Spike responds that Nikki never cared as much for her child as she did for fighting, or she wouldn’t have died: he is incapable of seeing Nikki as having an emotional existence outside the fated and fatal love affair between vampire and vampire slayer. In Spike’s revised and expanded version of his origins and his fight with Nikki, he adds an additional layer of justification: Once vamped, William’s mother, who is defined solely by her affection for her son, expresses her “evil nature” by revealing her desire to travel the world and making incestuous advances on her son. Spike frames a mother’s desires independent of her child as a betrayal of that child, equating his mother’s wish for independence with her incestuous advances and with Nikki Wood’s obligation to fight as a Slayer. Again, he rewrites his confrontation with Nikki into a choice that she made, rather than a duty she had to fulfill, obscuring the limitations of her life and his own responsibility for her death. His denial that Nikki’s maternal feelings were as important as her role as Slayer once again erases her personhood–and it’s notable that the only personal aspect of Nikki Wood we ever see is another relational role defining her, that of mother.

Robin strips his mother’s coat off Spike before beginning the fight, but Spike wins and reclaims Nikki’s coat as his own, as a symbol of his defeat of Robin and of his triumph over his own unpleasant memories. Spike dies in the Buffy finale but appears on Angel, initially as a discorporate ghost tormented by another ghost at Wolfram & Hart. The other ghost demonstrates his power over Spike by stripping him naked–and of course Spike establishes his regained self-mastery by imagining his coat back on.

Spike eventually regains a corporeal body, complete with long black coat. In the episode “Damage,” he finally acknowledges the harm he did other people as a vampire when faced with Dana, a young Slayer who’s been driven insane by a combination of childhood trauma and the memories of previous Slayers, including the ones Spike killed. Dana refutes Spike’s claims from “Lies My Parents Told Me,” speaking in Nikki’s voice of her longing to see her young son; she strips Nikki’s coat off Spike’s back before torturing him. But Dana is captured by the Angel-headed Wolfram & Hart and despite Spike’s new self-realization, in the next episode he’s wearing the coat again.

There’s a moment near the end of the series, in the antepenultimate episode “The Girl in Question,” when it seems like Spike will really learn better, like he will really acknowledge and accept the self-centeredness of his conception of the world, women, and Slayers; there’s a moment when he loses his leather coat. But no: there’s an admiring fangirl in the text who returns an exact copy of the coat to him.

If I’m charitable, I guess I can read the return of the coat by the head of the Italian office of Wolfram & Hart as an acknowledgement that wearing the coat represents the evil Spike’s done: but most of the time I just feel like the show is fucking taunting me, holding justice just out of my reach. And this is the problem, this is where I can’t speak in the detached academic tone anymore, this is not where the understanding of the character breaks down but where the understanding of the text does. Because ultimately the text argues what Spike does: that it’s Spike’s story that counts.

And Spike goes out of the world of Buffy the Vampire Slayer like he came in: wearing Nikki Wood’s fucking coat.

He might as well be wearing her flayed skin.

Saskaia writes about the uses of Quileute characters and ndnness:

I came to the Twilight novels after a friend pointed them out in the bookstore and I linked it to the casting drama that showed up at ndnz (but was then deleted by the poster or commenter). I came into the books interested in the Edward/Bella romance but was happily surprised to see that Jacob Black was a prominent character, in purpose and/or dialogue, through out the entire series. I liked that these were modern Indians, the pre-werewolf Jacob seemed real enough, or common enough, a good kid interested in auto-mechanics, strong relationship with his father and friends. He had a sense of humor that made me laugh out loud often. I applauded when Meyer was clever enough to make Charlie and Billy best friends so that Jacob taking Bella on as a friend so quickly made sense to me. Of all the scenes at La Push, the time in the garage building the bikes, the Spaghetti Party with the Blacks and Clearwaters, and Breakfast Muffins with Emily felt the most authentic to me. I didn’t mind the muffins over frybread because it was morning and it would have seemed heavy-handed to me to use frybread.

[...]

Conversely, I wondered how every single Quileute was russet-colored (and if I never ever read “russet-colored” again it won’t be a moment too soon). I live in the Southeast and in my family alone we range from every shade of brown to quite pale (like me) to Black like many of my cousins and other extended family. I would be lying if I did not think we’re a good lookin’ bunch of folks but we’re not all insanely gorgeous like all of Meyer’s Indians, aside from Kim. The exotification of was heavy-handed, most likely in Meyer’s attempt to show that she thinks Indians are beautiful, strong, and we all but walk on water, *lol*, but, instead, it shoved me out of the story and reminded me that this was a non-Native writing Indian characters. For instance, Meyer loved Alexie’s new YA novel so I think she has a grip on what is an authentic young PNW Native boy’s voice and experience. Granted, things may be different in the West, but I still know more than a few Indians that don’t look like something out of Disney’s Pocahontas, even the Plains folks, although I can’t help but think she was reading a dime-store novel about Comanches or the Dakota when she was drafting Jacob’s description. While Jacob was written to be mostly age-appropriate, I think she did fall into uber-sexy warrior territory after his first phasing as a werewolf, but perhaps it paled in comparison to how dazzling Edward was in every scene? Bella is a dubious narrator when it came to the physical descriptions of Edward and Jacob, but the subtext ran to the Hot!Indian to me.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Buffy and Race « Reading While Black on 05 May 2008 at 6:28 am

    [...] [Source] [...]

Comments

  1. Persia wrote:

    I could never forgive Spike for continuing to wear that coat. I don’t think I ever will. And I could accept that more easily if I thought that the narrative considered it a character flaw– but it clearly doesn’t. I’ll have to read more when I log into my LJ this evening.

  2. Erin wrote:

    “In Spike’s revised and expanded version of his origins and his fight with Nikki, he adds an additional layer of justification: Once vamped, William’s mother, who is defined solely by her affection for her son, expresses her “evil nature” by revealing her desire to travel the world and making incestuous advances on her son.”

    Just a note of clarification: Nikki Wood was never turned into a vampire. The First took on her form (as it can take the form of all dead people) and appeared to Robin Wood. So Spike wasn’t involved in that portion at all.

    It’s an interesting analysis…I can understand a lot of the points. I’d be really interested to hear what Joss Whedon thinks of the racial critiques/commentaries…my gut instinct is that he’s pretty much your stereotypical, somewhat clueless “well-meaning white guy”.

  3. Brigitte wrote:

    After seeing that backstory is so wanted for Principal Wood to kill Spike.

  4. Anonymous wrote:

    Erin,

    I believe the quote regarding Spike’s additional layer of backstory actually pertains to his own mother. Spike was originally named William (and according to Giles’s texts was known for a time as, “William the Bloody”). In Lies My Parents Told Me, Spike turns his mother into a vampire to save her from the slow and torturous death she’s been fated to have via consumption and also to keep her close. The incestuous remarks VampireMother makes to him are demonstrative of the demon that has taken over her body and has no regard and deep, maternal love for the son that the previously alive woman so obviously had for her son. Since that portion of the story was told in relatively quick flashbacks, it was a cheap and fast technique to show demonization of the woman and also to justify Spike’s dusting her out of horror and disgust.

    While I agree with the overall analysis that Spike keeping Nikki’s coat demonstrated a distinct lack of appreciation for his actions and vis-a-vis killing Slayers, and can therefore be considered a serious flaw in the character (considering he spans two shows and two networks in the Whedonverse, you’d think they’d have some time to fix him if they wanted), it’s ultimately true to his character. Spike changes only in so far as Spike wants to change.

    His achievement of a soul is purely out of selfish love for Buffy, not because he wants to atone for any past acts or feel any of the pain he’s wrought for over a century. In fact, Spike maintains a sense of pride with regard to the horrors he’s committed, even while his new/old soul makes him regret them… I’ve always seen the continued redonning of the coat as simply indicative of said pride, rather than a trivialization of the race of the Slayer who originally wore it.

  5. Logan wrote:

    The very interesting thing about Spike, which I really respect Joss on, is the women issues that he had while as a Vampire which plague him until he gets his soul back. The story of his turning comes that he was distraught after he was unable to tell a woman he fancied how he felt (who turned out to be a Vengeance Demon, but that’s another story) and how he was pretty much a mama’s boy. I’d say that he had issues prior to his turning, which were further exacerbated by two incidents. One, his mother’s reaction when she was turned (and another example since Spike just enforced his will upon her) which was already documented, plus when Spike’s sire Drusilla, a woman that he loved, was found having sex with Angel, a man who could possibly represent a father figure to Spike, especially in the early years of his being a Vampire.

    These events, plus his complete lack of conscious, set off his issues with women. In addition to the mentioned Slayer issues of the Chinese one and Nikki Wood, he had a highly abusive relationship with Harmony, at times a seemingly violent relationship with Drusilla (I believe at one point after their breakup he says he’ll torture Dru until she loves him again, which while on its surface makes sense cause Dru’s a loon, could also represent his women issues with her), and of course his relationship with Buffy, in particular his attempted rape of her after she breaks off the sexual use that they had with each other.

    It’s her attempted rape, in particular, which is the rock bottom point for Spike. While for selfish reasons so to speak, it starts the process of his own rehabilitation. And, a major part of the process is to come to terms with who he is, the sexism involved, his issues with his mother, pretty much who he was. The Spike who returns, and who Robin Wood attacks is not the Spike who left Sunnydale, but rather one still weak, still trying to come to terms with his actions.

    Admittedly, my Season 7 knowledge is a little rusty, but the fight with Robin Wood to me is a turning point in Spike’s history. By being able to get over the issues of his mother, he overcomes the issues which have plagued him, his own weak issues and impressions of women. Prior to this, I completly see the coat that he wore as an act of defiance of Nikki Wood, the one last fuck you to her that he took her coat. However, with the Robin fight, the symbol of the coat transforms in my eyes. When he picks up the coat after the fight, he’s not doing so to act like he did to Nikki wood. The coat seems to represent Spike the Man, the same man a few episodes earlier Buffy said she needed. Spike donning his coat again at this point in time meant he was over the issues which plagued him.

    And really, if you trace Spike’s history after this, there is a difference in how he acts. He’s there to provide Buffy the emotional support she needs for the final fight, he had a platonic love and respect for Fred in S5 of Angel, he’s pretty much the punching bag of Illyria and her partner throughout the rest of S5, and even in the After the Fall comic, while he does have many women in real tight bikinis at the Playboy Mansion, he’s at the same time empowering them while playing off the seeming desires and impressions from other demon lords in Los Angelus in Hell, plus the comfort he provides for Illyria in AtF.

    And really, this is all what the blog writer was saying, in the end, it was Spike’s story. While he might feel for Nikki Wood, she was never more than a supporting character for Spike or Robin. I disagree on how the coat always represents Nikki, but he does make real good points on the feminism issues present with Spike.

  6. Tree wrote:

    Oh dear. Singing the praises of Sherman Alexie? Does that mean the author in question is going to ‘consult’ him to ensure authenticity?

    I can only think of two things that are russet, personally; the bottom of a truck bed and a type of potato. Most of my relatives who were bloods looked Middle-Eastern.

    Did she read Ten Little Indians, for crying out loud? (Not a YA novel but certainly a light laugh–or cynical bark of what have you, at the countless stereotypes versus reality.)

    I smell Charles De Lint. (Although deconstructing him would take hours with all of the material he’s written.)

    These essays are really eye-opening. Amid all the squealing it’s often hard to find people who even want to look at their fan-cult’s source material from a critical point of view.

  7. Melymbrosia wrote:

    Hey, this is Untrue-Accounts @ Livejournal.

    Latoya — Thank you for the kind words! I’m blushing.

    Gianduja Kiss, who edited the video, and I have been following the discussion with a lot of interest. For us, the primary document was the video, which makes a visual argument via the narrative conventions of “fan vidding,” amateur music videos fans make to explore, criticize, or celebrate aspects of their favorite media. I wrote the essay as an adjunct to the video. While I think it’s a valid reading in itself, it isn’t meant as a *full* reading, or a full expression of my argument, because I assumed that it would only be of interest to some subset of people who watched the video. The video’s meant to situate the symbol of Spike’s coat within the narrative of people of color in the Buffyverse; to use it as an emblem of the systematic suppression of the stories of people of color–particularly women–Kendra, the Chinese slayer (never even named in canon), Nikki Wood, Robin Wood, Dana, to some extent the Potential slayers both of color and white–in favor of the redemption story of the white male, i.e., Spike.

    What I wanted to do with the video–what I think can best be done by fan creative interactions such as fan fiction and vidding, rather than by essays — was to rewrite the story of the Buffyverse with people of color at the center. And this rewriting shows up the flaws, the suppressions, and the silences in the canonical version, and the way the characters whose stories are suppressed–the characters who are killed, mutilated, dispossessed, imprisoned, and silenced–are disproportionately characters of color.

    The essay focuses its argument on Spike-as-antagonist, but I saw it as an adjunct to the video, in which the point is It’s not about Spike. The source privileges Spike’s story, and so does fandom. In some senses, Spike-in-the-video represent the show itself (as Spike kills women of color, the show uses their stories only in service of the white male’s story arc) and the fandom itself (as Spike’s point of view is privileged by the show, so fans’ responses often privileged Spike’s over that of the women he killed or men he assaulted).

    Erin @ 2 — As Anon @ 3 says, I meant William/Spike’s mother was vamped, not Nikki Wood. Both the episode “Lies My Parents Told Me” and Spike-the-character parallel Nikki Wood choosing to fight rather than return home to her son with William’s mother’s choice to travel the world and make sexual advances to her son rather than to continue being his passive admirer. The episode is not entirely in Spike’s camp–I think that the writers meant to cast considerable doubt on Spike’s reliability as a narrator of Nikki Wood’s life, but the episode is also extremely muddled, and its arguments in favor of Robin’s interpretation of Nikki are obscured by Robin’s general narrative placement vis-a-vis Spike (i.e., the narrative argues that Robin is wrong to consider Spike’s crimes against Nikki pertinent to the struggle for survival against the First, and Spike’s story gets considerably more time than Nikki’s or Robin’s). “Damage,” in which the insane slayer Dana speaks in Nikki’s voice to prove that Spike was wrong to see her role as slayer as disproof of love, is written by the same pair of writers as “Lies My Parents Told Me,” and is clearly meant as a continuation of or corrective to “Lies.” But again, other narrative choices undercut the correction offered.

    Anon @4 – I don’t disagree with your points, but I don’t see them as contradicting my point. Spike may not see continuing to wear the coat as a disrespectful appropriation of a black woman’s identity, and the writers may not have intended it so, but intent isn’t effect. Both Spike and the writers depend upon the viewer sympathy remaining with Spike and seeing his reformation as erasing the damage he’s done; his current possession erases the history of Nikki Wood’s dispossession.

    Logan @ 5 – I’m female. And your final paragraph is my point: The story is all about Spike. Your comments are all about Spike. They’re not about whether or not Spike adequately performed recompense to the women he injured or their heirs (as represented by Robin Wood and Dana); they’re about whether or not Spike feels like he made adequate recompense. And this is, in fictional form, a pretty good representation of the problem with the way society persistently centralizes the POV of white men and persistently overrides/overwrites other stories.

    Tree @ 6 – I couldn’t have written the essay or commissioned the video if I hadn’t been as furiously engaged with Buffy as I was sometimes furious with it.

  8. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Melymbrosia –

    Anytime. The vido was ridiculously mind blowing for me. I followed Buffy seasons 1 -4, but only watched the rest sporadically, so I had NO IDEA where Spike’s coat came from and the whole back story.

    And I had no idea that critical race analysis was happening in my favorite shows!

    Thanks for all the clarifications and I will add your fan community to my blog roll.

  9. shah8 wrote:

    a very big *smooth* for the link from a sci-fi lover!

  10. Logan wrote:

    Mel: My mistake, I was actually thinking when I threw the he comments in there if you were a female or not, but I wasn’t sure and just stuck with male. My apologies on that.

    And, I really won’t comment more, cause while I understand your point, there’s not much more I can say.