On Sean Bell: fear is cause for slaughter only when victim is black

by guest contributor dnA, originally published at Too Sense

Kai Wright ain’t never lied:

Ida B. Wells, at the turn of the 20th century, called it a “threadbare lie.” She was talking about how lynch mobs masquerading as law enforcement justified their actions by claiming black men were raping white women. But Wells was on to a larger delusion, one that not only inspired sexual hysteria 100 years ago, but that continues to legitimize all manner of brutality against black men today. The simple and sadly lasting truth is this: We scare the shit out of America. And that fear excuses just about any reaction it spawns.

It’s what led a group of New York City cops to riddle Sean Bell’s black body with bullets in November 2006. And just as in Wells’ day, it’s what made the slaughter legal. Justice Arthur Cooperman ruled last Friday that Bell’s killing was understandable because the cops were scared. Driven by their own dark fantasies about the people they were policing, the officers’ frightened minds conjured guns into the hands of unarmed men and recast a bachelor party as a gang fight. Or, in Cooperman’s more restrained words, “The officers responded to perceived criminal conduct.” Those perceptions, no matter how hysterical, legalized their murder.

Police are imbued with extraordinary powers as law enforcement officials. That makes it more, not less important that they be held accountable when they make a tragic mistake.

You’ll recall that fear was not an adequate excuse for John H. White when he was tried for manslaughter in the death of Daniel Cicciaro after Cicciaro and a bunch of his boys showed up on his front steps screaming racial slurs and making threats.

My feeling was that White is a grown man whose actions resulted in the death of another, and so he needed to be held responsible. The fact that these cops were professionals trained in the use of deadly force means they are even more accountable than Mr. White for their actions, and yet while White is serving time they have been held responsible for nothing.

That is a terrible double standard, and it isn’t the race of the perpetrator that counts in this instance, it is the race of the victim. If Sean Bell had been white, someone would have been held responsible for his death, the way someone was held responsible for Daniel Cicciaro’s. Wright points out that:

Much has been made of the fact that two of the three detectives who shot Bell and his two pals were people of color. It’s significant that the one white cop, Oliver, fired 31 of the 50 shots, and that the black cop, Cooper, is the only one to have apologized to the Bell family. But the reflexive assumptions of threat that drive the death-by-cop racial disparity are systemic rather than individual. Black and Latino cops like Cooper and Isnora operate within a bureaucracy that not only condones but encourages them to see black men as combatants.

That’s why the arguments about how this has nothing to do with race don’t wash; if victims of racism could shrug off its without internalizing it, racism wouldn’t actually be a problem.

As a ColorLines magazine investigation documented last fall, blacks accounted for 66 percent of those killed by New York City police between 2000 and 2007 (New York is a perennial leader in police fatalities, averaging 12 a year over those years). And while the violent crime rate plunged to historically low levels in that time period, the number of people killed by police has not budged—indeed, the number of cop bullets fired has skyrocketed. And it’s happened with impunity. Out of 88 fatal shootings, including at least 12 in which victims were unarmed, in only one instance was an officer convicted of criminal wrongdoing.

The Bell verdict will only cement the NYPD’s indifference to wasting black life. They simply aren’t held accountable. All they have to do is say they’re “scared”, and the media sympathizes, because they’re scared of us too.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. links for 2008-05-03 « don’t ya wish your girlfriend was smart like me? on 03 May 2008 at 7:52 pm

    [...] On Sean Bell: fear is cause for slaughter only when victim is black from Racialicious-an excellent critique of the Sean Bell case and race (tags: racism violence) [...]

Comments

  1. Tiffany wrote:

    If white’s aka European’s are so called superior to blacks then why should they “fear us”…

    Shouldn’t we fear them and be running around killing them for “no apparent reason”

  2. Eva wrote:

    I really don’t understand this “fear.” If the cops are so afraid of black people then they should work in a state like Idaho, or a place there aren’t many black folks.

  3. islandgirl550 wrote:

    Eva, I don’t understand the “fear” either. What exactly are they afraid of?

  4. Eccentric1 wrote:

    So let us be clear. The law has shown now that fear is justifiable cause to murder black Americans with torrential rain storms of bullets. It is somehow considered just to leave a wife to be husbandless and her children fatherless. It is some how just to comfort and compensate their terrible loss with the equivalent of “My apologies Mam. We were scared.” But, if fear is involved, and a white American is killed, even with at least 49 fewer bullets fired, justice is served with conviction and prison time.

    Hmmm. Equal application this is not.

    This is a reminder and a notice to others that this Law creature is not blind, or just, and it doesn’t have warm and fuzzy feelings about black Americans.

  5. deb wrote:

    Earl Ofari Hutchison mentions the “fear” factor in his article Verdict in Bell Shooting Is No Big Surprise. The verdict was no surprise to me either. Perception is key.

    If you’re white and get shot at the way Sean Bell & Co. were shot at, then you had better be a threat, like David Garvin. “The police fired more than 50 rounds and struck Garvin 30 times.” But that dude was armed and dangerous.

    When you’re black and breathing and just happen to have the misfortune of carrying a wallet (Amadou Diallo), or hairbrush (Khiel Coppin), or of being in a car (Sean Bell) — presto-change-O! these items suddenly become weapons of mass destruction in the eyes of the police.

    So I’m glad Hutchison mentioned the word “perception.” Society already has an idea of want a threat looks like, and usually he’s non-white. So the typical attitude is, pre-emptive strike first, ask questions later.

  6. Sean wrote:

    If “fear” is now grounds for “justifiable” homicide, then NYC has just set a dangerous precedent.

    Cops can now go out and commit state-sanctioned murder just because they’re “afraid” of a suspect. What’s next? Will the state say it’s ok for a cop to shoot a man wearing a turban 50 times because he’s “afraid” he might be a terrorist?

    So since this is apparently the case, why should an African American male pull over when the police tells him to? I guess “to PROTECT and serve” doesn’t apply to select groups.

  7. Sean wrote:

    Deb said: “Society already has an idea of want a threat looks like, and usually he’s non-white. So the typical attitude is, pre-emptive strike first, ask questions later.”

    This is an unfortunate truth, to put it mildly. Charles Stuart and Susan Smith were BOTH counting on society’s “idea” of a threat, in the hopes of getting away with their crimes.

    At this point, I really see no difference between the NYPD and the Gestapo.

  8. Anonymiss wrote:

    I’m still very hurt by the verdict. The system has no regards for the lives of Black people.

    I can’t for the life of me understand the fear that White people have of us. Is it White guilt translated into fear? According to history, White people have committed some of the most heinous crimes known to humankind yet they’re scared of us.

  9. Robert L. Foley Jr wrote:

    Dear Friends,

    An earnest and respectful request that the US Attorney General commence a federal probe of the shooting death of Sean Bell, and the subsequent astonishing and distressing acquittal of the NYPD officers responsible for Sean Bell’s untimely and violent death.

    Please go to the online petition site below:

    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/federal-probe-into-the-shooting-death-of-sean-bell-and-subsequent-acquittal-of-those-nypd-officers

    Robert Lewis Foley, Jr.

    Please unite your voice with ours and share this with everyone you know who is concerned about justice, human rights and the sanctity of human life.

  10. Angel H. wrote:

    Sorry to distract from the post but…

    Their baby girl is soooo cute!!!!

  11. el philthmoor wrote:

    fear?? or hate?? thats the million dollar question ..fear doesnt allow you shot an unarmed man 50 times-4 times in his head?? 3 black man packed into a Nissan doesnt evoke fear..we need to reexamine our remarks..i do agree that fear does exist but it has metamorphed into a deep sentinment of hate and revenge amongst the NYPD and every other damn PD in urban America.turn on the idiot box and your greeted with American Gangster on BET..showcasing the coldest of cold bloodedness the ghetto has produced in three generations..then the History Channel? has Gangland-then MSNBC has the prison series..then theres 48 hours where the victim and the murderer are 89% black or hispanic..then vh1 gives us Flavor Flav and his “a swore I saw her in a porno”chicks ..i mean cmon i could continue but I’ll stop bcuz the time to realize we are being dehumanized and targeted for execution is as evident as ever..i live in Harlem and if you’ve ever visited 125th you’ve seen the lynching pictures that the brothers hang up acroos the street from Apollo – it speaks volumes to your psychi when you look at the barbaric,pyscopathic,demonic behaviors of White Americans two generations before mine..and it also gives me a heads up to what White Americans have historically been getting away with when it comes to the wholesale murder of our people..some even say the white robe was replaced by blue uniforms when shit started to get hot and im not one who will argue that fact,,the brothers who killed Sean Bell have been programmed by that poisonous system to hate one who looks like them. the brothers that kill each other in these streets have been programmed to hate each other..I seriously doubt any man of caucasian descent will get shot 5 times by another caucasian based on fear and they are feared also (columbine,blackwater,mall shootings.)
    like jeremiah wright is saying and a majority of Black America is demanding we must confront these historical injustices bestowed upon us by the Caucasian , re educate ourselves and our children and start policing our own communites or you will see cities in flames because the patience is running out as i type this.

  12. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    Re “fear excuses just about any reaction it spawns”: This is the same reason Americans killed, oppressed, and stole from Indians for several hundred years. Wounded Knee was the ultimate example of this–a wild overreaction to the largely peaceful Ghost Dances. (See http://www.bluecorncomics.com/baum6.htm#ghostdance for a discussion of this point.)

  13. Slush wrote:

    Okay I don’t have all the facts on Sean Bell but it reminds me a lot of the acquittal of Bernard Goetz in New York in the 80’s, whose self-defense claim was believed mainly because his would-be muggers were black, i.e. thus it was reasonable to be terrified for your life and shoot them all in the head. I guess New York courts haven’t progressed much in the last 20 years.

  14. david wrote:

    “Police are imbued with extraordinary powers as law enforcement officials. That makes it more, not less important that they be held accountable when they make a tragic mistake.”

    You said it..”tragic mistake”. You must understand that tragic mistkes do not amount to criminal liability. This is the law, whether yoyou, me or the next person like it. The officers must show a “reckles indiffernce” to human life in order to be held liable for criminally negligent homicide. Manslaughter is even a slightly higher bar. Murder requires intent.

    What blows my mind is how race is even an issue here. 2 of the 3 cops are monorities. Does this tell you something? Hmmm….maybe cops aren’t all racist afterall. Maybe monority officers face the same challenges that white officers face. It would be more appropriae to question the policies in place that led to this tragic situation.

    Just last summer two NYC police officrs were shot at point blank range while approaching a stolen vehicle in Brooklyn. Do any black leaders talk about how these occurences do a disservice to the rest of the black community. Why no outrage then. How wold something like that effect you as a police officer if your collegue got his head blown off because he gave someone the benefit of the doubt?

    Thee cops had never fired there guns before. Look at the line of work they are in. They work undervocer ina dangerous neighborhood, at a strip club with a history of violence, drugs, and prostitution. Do you even consider these factors or do your emotions dictate your reasining? We need to evaluate wheter it is worth it to conduct these undercover operations, not whether or not race was involved.

  15. Slush wrote:

    But David, you must know that being a member of an ethnic minority doesn’t mean you can’t be racist, whether toward other races or your own. If you’re not convinced about this I imagine a cursory exploration of this blog’s archives might explain what I mean in more depth. Yes, police have a dangerous job and many folks may fail to appreciate that, but did you note the statistic from Colorlines about 66% of police killings in New York being black victims? 66%!!!

  16. RainaWeather wrote:

    Police officers KNOW their jobs is dangerous. That’s why they have to go through training, for safety.

  17. Renee wrote:

    Much has been made of the fact that two of the three detectives who shot Bell and his two pals were people of color. It’s significant that the one white cop, Oliver, fired 31 of the 50 shots, and that the black cop, Cooper, is the only one to have apologized to the Bell family. But the reflexive assumptions of threat that drive the death-by-cop racial disparity are systemic rather than individual. Black and Latino cops like Cooper and Isnora operate within a bureaucracy that not only condones but encourages them to see black men as combatants.

    That is the statement that stood out for me the most. Note that it is the white cop that fired the most amount of bullets. Clearly this is a racially motivated killing. By giving a free pass to these officers all that the judge did is sanction further murders. Yes, I used the word murder because that is exactly what happened to Sean Bell.
    Historically the whites have propagated the image of the violent, criminal, raping black men. They have used this social justification for murders and lynchings. Unless black men are being used as highly exploitable labor their bodies are constructed as something one needs to fear. Many white apologist would have us believe that racism is a thing of the past, however the body of Sean Bell gives testimony to an entirely different reality.

  18. Joshua wrote:

    The allegation that the shooting was racially motivated is preposterous. A group of undercover officers working in a gun- and drug-plagued strip joint in Queens had good reason to believe that a party leaving the club was armed and about to shoot an adversary. When one of the undercovers identified himself as an officer, the car holding the party twice tried to run him down. The officer started firing while yelling to the car’s occupants: “Let me see your hands.” His colleagues, believing they were under attack, fired as well, eventually shooting off 50 rounds and killing the driver, Sean Bell. No gun was found in the car, but witnesses and video footage confirm that a fourth man in the party fled the scene once the altercation began. Bell and the other men with him all had been arrested for illegal possession of guns in the past; one of Bell’s companions that night, Joseph Guzman, had spent considerable time in prison, including for an armed robbery in which he shot at his victim.

    Nothing in these facts suggests that racial animus lay behind the incident. (Though this detail should be irrelevant, the undercover team was racially mixed, and the officer who fired the first shot was black.) But even more preposterous than the assertion of such animus is the claim by New York’s self-appointed minority advocates that the well-being of the minority community is what motivates them. If it were, here are seven things that you would have heard them say years ago:

    1. “Stop the killing!” Since 1993, 11,353 people have been murdered in New York City. The large majority of victims and perpetrators have been black. Not a single one of those black-on-black killings has prompted protest or demonstrations from the city’s black advocates. Sharpton, Barron, et al. are happy to let thousands of black victims get mowed down by thugs without so much as a whispered call for “peace” or “justice”; it’s only when a police officer, trying to protect the public, makes a good faith mistake in a moment of intense pressure that they rise as vindicators of black life. (As for caring about slain police officers, forget about it. Sixteen cops—including several black policemen—have been killed since 1999, not one of whom elicited a public demonstration of condolence from the race hustlers.)

    If the city’s black advocates paid even a tiny fraction of the attention they pay to shootings by criminals as they pay to shootings by police, they could change the face of the city. If demonstrators gathered outside the jail cell of every rapist and teen stick-up thug, cameras in tow, to shame them for their attacks on law-abiding minority residents, they could deglamorize the gangsta life. Think you’ll find Sharpton or Barron patrolling with the police in dark housing project stairways, trying to protect residents from predators? Not a chance.

    2. “Police killings of innocent civilians—each one of them a horror—are nonetheless rare.” The instances of an officer shooting an innocent, unarmed victim are so unusual that they can be counted on one’s fingers. Last year, of the nine suspects fatally shot by the police, two had just fired at a police officer, three were getting ready to fire, two had tried to stab an officer, and two were physically attacking an officer. Far more frequent are the times when the NYPD refrains from using force though clearly authorized to do so. So far this year, officers have been fired upon four times, without returning fire. In 2005, there were five such incidents. And the NYPD apprehended 3,428 armed felons this year, 15 percent more than last year. Each arrest of a gun-toting thug involves the potential for the use of deadly force, yet is almost always carried out peacefully.

    The Department has dramatically driven down the rate of all police shootings—justified and not—over the decades (in 1973, there were 1.82 fatal police shootings per 1,000 officers; in 2005, there were 0.25 such shootings per 1,000 officers, bringing the absolute number of police shootings down from 54 in 1973 to nine in 2005). The NYPD’s per capita rate of shootings is lower than many big city departments.

    Yet New York Times columnist Bob Herbert charges the police with an unbroken pattern of “blowing away innocent individuals with impunity.” The “community,” he wrote on November 30 of last year, “which is sick of these killings, is simmering,” What are “these killings,” about which the “community” is simmering? Herbert reaches back over three decades and adduces five prior to the recent shooting of Sean Bell. Each was a disaster that provoked the NYPD to scrutinize its tactics. But the number of innocent bystanders killed by criminal thugs in New York dwarfs the number of innocents killed by the police. Sharpton recently said that the minority community has to fear police officers as much as robbers. This is a groundless charge. What is true is that stoking the myth that the police are a threat to blacks harms the minority community by inflaming anti-cop sentiment and retarding community cooperation in the fight against crime in inner-city neighborhoods.

    3. “The police work every day to save lives.” If New York City murders had remained at their early 1990s highs, instead of dropping from 1,927 killings in 1993 to 540 in 2005, 13,698 more people—most of them black and Hispanic—would have been dead by last year. They are alive today thanks to the relentless efforts of the NYPD to bring the same level of safety to poor minority neighborhoods as to Greenwich Village and the Upper East Side.

    The undercover officers who killed Sean Bell were working the strip club in Queens where the incident occurred at 4 AM because of its record of illegal guns and drug sales. Their intentions that night were to protect the residents of Jamaica and the occupants of the club from violence; that they ended up killing an unarmed man is undoubtedly a nightmare for them almost as horrific as it is for the victim’s family.

    There is absolutely no evidence that racial hatred lay behind either the officers’ presence at the club or their behavior once there—contrary to the outrageous slander of New York City Councilman Al Vann, who called the shooting of Bell and other police shootings the product of “a discriminatory mind, a prejudiced mind,” adding, “We have to admit [that] the problem is . . . institutional racism.”

    A New York Times reporter, Cara Buckley, coyly echoed this inflammatory charge. In referring to the undercover officer who fired the first shots at the car, she says: “The officer’s fear, if that was what motivated him, was unfounded” (emphasis added). We will leave aside the spurious judgment that just because no gun was ultimately found on the car’s occupants, the officer’s fear of a gun was “unfounded.” The officer, after all, had heard Sean Bell say, “Let’s f**K him up,” and Bell’s friend, Joseph Guzman, respond, “Yo, get my gun.” That officer was then the target of an oncoming vehicle driven by Bell. The most offensive part of Buckley’s statement, though, is her suggestion that the officer might have been motivated by something other than fear—and what else could that be but racism or some kind of violent animus?

    The New York Times, Al Vann, and other City Council hotheads such as Helen Foster notwithstanding, someone who believes that black lives are worth less than white lives is not going to put his own life at risk working in dangerous environments trying to get guns away from criminals.

    4. “If you witnessed a crime, help the authorities solve it.” The police could probably lock away just about every dangerous thug roaming the streets if they got more cooperation from witnesses and people with knowledge of the crime. Instead, they often encounter a wall of hostile silence in minority communities. Bystanders sometimes deliberately block officers chasing a criminal. The stigma against helping the police—referred to derogatorily as “snitching”—is pervasive. “If you’re a snitch, people want to kill you,” a teen robber in a Brooklyn crime rehabilitation program that I observed this spring explained. Helping the police is seen as helping the enemy, defined in racial terms. Even black officers are part of the hated white establishment. “Black cops, I disrespect them. They sucking the white man,” asserted another juvenile delinquent in the Crown Heights rehab program.

    Many law-abiding residents of crime-ridden neighborhoods buck this self-defeating social norm. They attend police-community council meetings in their local precinct month after month, learning about police initiatives, and they report anonymously on drug deals and vice hot spots. They are the eyes and ears of the department, and without their help, the NYPD might not have achieved the unmatched crime drop of the last decade. It would be astounding if any of the anti-police activists leading protests about the Sean Bell shooting had ever attended a precinct community meeting or offered to help the police solve crimes. Presumably, they have more important things to do than work to improve the quality of life in minority neighborhoods. Let the police take care of that. But even if the anti-cop activists can’t be bothered to give a few hours a month to fight crime, they could at least use their bully pulpit to call on others to share what they know about criminals and to help get violent offenders off the street before they injure more people and property. Instead, their opportunistic cop-bashing only increases the hatred of the police and the stigma against cooperating with them. As a result, more lives will be taken by cop-eluding barbarians.

    5. “The NYPD and the criminal justice system investigate every police shooting with profound seriousness; they will not rest until the facts are uncovered and justice done.” The premise of the current grandstanding by “minority advocates” is that the authorities would shrug off the recent shooting without heat from the street. One thinks of the rooster in the fable, who believes that his crowing raises the sun. “Business will not go on as usual until we get justice for Sean Bell,” Sharpton said. It is not Sharpton and his cronies who are getting justice for Bell, however. The street agitators could all go home (sometimes, as in the case of Sharpton, to suburbia) and wait quietly for a resolution, and the system would proceed just as diligently to assign fault if fault was present and to hold any wrongdoers accountable.

    Other publicity-hungry politicians are just as desperate to add their voices to the post-shooting hue and cry. New York Senators Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton issued a joint statement: “It is of the utmost importance that the investigating authorities, led by the Queens district attorney, conduct an aggressive, impartial investigation to ferret out the facts.” What do they think would have happened without this self-righteous piece of boilerplate? That the “investigating authorities” would have conducted a biased, half-hearted investigation?

    Every time the anti-police lobby issues superfluous demands for a “full investigation” and threats of violence if “justice” is not done, they send the destructive message that the police are indifferent to the loss of life. Or worse: “I’m not asking my people to do anything passive anymore,” said City Councilman Charles Barron. “Don’t ask us to ask our people to be peaceful while they are being murdered. We’re not the only ones that can bleed.”

    6. “Police officers make mistakes; tragically, those mistakes are sometimes deadly.” Perhaps Al Sharpton, Charles Barron, and Jesse Jackson have never made an error of judgment, except for Tawana Brawley and such like. Perhaps, too—though this is truly unlikely—they have had to confront the possibility that they are facing someone about to shoot them and in a split-second to decide whether to shoot first. Perhaps in such circumstances, they would never ever make the wrong decision. If so, perhaps they are justified in strutting around like beings of superhuman prescience and infallibility.

    But most police officers are like other human beings: they do make mistakes. And because they are carrying lethal weapons, in order to counter the illegal firepower packed by lowlifes, very occasionally those mistakes take an innocent life. The Police Department works incessantly to make sure that its officers never make a fatal error. It tries to drill into officers reflexes that will guard against wrong split-second judgments. It constantly reviews its training and official procedures to improve those reflexes. But out in the field, even the best training can prove inadequate to the pressure and confusion of a possibly deadly encounter.

    This is not to say that the public and elected officials should automatically excuse every police shooting—which they are obviously far from doing. But to presume that every mistaken shooting represents a system-wide failure is inaccurate and unrealistic. The New York Times darkly commands: “[T]he Police Department must . . . confront the fact that a disaster that everyone swore to prevent seven years ago has repeated itself in Queens.” But because cops are humans and therefore fallible, it is impossible to prevent every wrongful shooting—without emasculating the police entirely. The New York Times has itself made a few mistakes over the last seven years; perhaps it, too, needs to confront its persistent fallibility.

    7. “The police concentrate their efforts in minority communities because that is where the crime is.” Race hustlers accuse the police of “racially profiling” and targeting minorities for unjustified police action. After showing up in New York for his time in the Sean Bell spotlight, Jesse Jackson announced: “Our criminal-justice system has broken down for black Americans and young black males. We’ve marched and marched, bled too profusely, and died too young. We must draw a line in the sand and fight back.”

    Memo to Jackson: The police have a disproportionate number of interactions with blacks because blacks are committing a disproportionate number of crimes. That fact comes from the testimony of the victims of those crimes, themselves largely black, not from the police. In New York City, blacks committed 62 percent of all murders, rapes, robberies, and assaults from 1998 to 2006, according to victim and witness identification, even though they make up only 25 percent of the city’s population. Whites committed 8 percent of those crimes over that period, though they are 28 percent of New York residents. These proportions have been stable for years and remain so today. It’s not the “criminal-justice system” that has broken down for young black males; it’s families and other sources of cultural support. Changing the subject and blaming the police just perpetuates the problem.

    The furor over the Sean Bell shooting shows no sign of abating; if anything, the specious racial rhetoric is becoming more ugly and dangerous. To the extent that the exploitation of this tragic event makes the police think twice about engaging with possible criminals or turn a blind eye to crime in the ghetto (as was once the case), the most direct victims will be the hundreds of thousands of innocent, upstanding minority New Yorkers.

  19. al wrote:

    the justice system is broken and racist. and it’s frighteningly consistent in it’s racism too. when was the last time a cop -was- convicted of wrongfully killing a black man?

    but wesley snipes gets jail time for tax evasion.

    and how many innocent boys had their lives ruined by being convicted in the central park jogger case again?

  20. david wrote:

    Al,

    You assert: “when was the last time a cop -was- convicted of wrongfully killing a black man?”

    Just last year a white police officer was convicted for the shooting of an unarmed African immigrnat in a warehouse during a police raid. He is currently in prison. Also, in case you didn’t continue to follow after the Rodney King riots, most if not all of the officers acquitted in the State proceedings were convicted on Federal charges of violating his civil rights. Plus Rodney King was compnesated with millions of dollars and now can be found on stage at rap concerts and partying in various hotspots around the country. As far ash the Central Park jogger? That was extremely unfortuante, and nobody feels worse than the victim of that absolutely horrible crime. How about Bernanrd Goetz? He did 20n years even after the “victims” admited tha they were going to rob him before he shot them. Howe about Nick Minnucci? He was convicted of a hate crime and sentenced to over 10 years in prision for hitting a guy with a bat that admitted to police he was looking for a white neighborhood to steal cars in.

    As for Wesley Snipes. LOLOLOL. The man was a tax protestor. do you know what that means? It means that he believed that the federal Governement has no right to collect taxes so he purposely evaded teh IRS by a) not paying his taxes and 2) hiding them in of shore accounts. he was acquitted of the most serious charges and not suprisingly took the “I am the poor little victim and the white man is resopnsible for all my faulires” approach.

    I would just like to wanr you of the dangers of teaching an entire generation of young black people that they are not resonsible for their own actions and that their failures in life are someone elses fault. Its a cancer in the black community. It provides justification for lazy unemployed indivuduals who do nothing to better themsleves, their community, or their family to sit around and complain about racism that only exists in their head. LOL, imagine if eceryone went around life feeling sorry for themsleves and angry about injustices of the past. Unfortuntely, the only way for the current black leadership to stay relevant is to keep the idea of racism and injustice at the top of the priorities for the blck comunity. If there is progress than they will become irrelevant and blck people will actually have to take the difficult step of asking what they can do to improve their own comunity, instead what the “white man” can do for them.

    And just curious, I like to hear about all the initiatives in the black comunity? How about atually having children out of marriage and raising a proper family so the next generation actually has a fighting shot at a better life?

  21. david wrote:

    You say:

    “the brothers who killed Sean Bell have been programmed by that poisonous system to hate one who looks like them. the brothers that kill each other in these streets have been programmed to hate each other”

    LOL, you see what I am saying? “Programmed to kill eachother and hate eachother”? Don’t you see how tht way of thinking is just down right poisonious and unporgessive? Are black people not capable of making choices for themsleves? You take the easy way out my friend. I’ve been there before, and its always easy to blame everyone but yourself. But the truth is that that way of thinking does more harm than good to your community even if there was an elemnt of truth to it.

    Take responsibiltiy of your own actions and everyhting else will fall into place. It is the first step to becoming a man. Then you will have the tools to strp on your work boots, work hard everyday, get married and raise a proper family. Then the next generation will be in a better place and so on. Thats how it works. No doubt blacks were held back from social proges for a long time in many parts of this country, but now ALL citiens have an equal opportunity under the law, and if oyu donlt believe me then go to law school and tell me if you think differently at the end of it. Life is not fair, and there are serious challenges ahead, but the first step is take responisibility for your actions.

  22. DivergentDana wrote:

    Wow, condescending much, david?