It’s Baaack: Sweet Valley High Redux

by Guest Contributor Nadra Kareem, originally published at The Whirliest Girl

Years ago my mother was an avid reader of the Harlequin Romance series, while I read what some would view as the young adult version of those books—Sweet Valley High. From about fourth through sixth grade, I was obsessed with the central characters of the series, a pair of blond, blue-eyed Southern California twins named Jessica and Elizabeth Wakefield. Now, I’ve learned that the books, first published about 25 years ago, are back. The series has been updated to include references to contemporary technology, such as email, the Internet and cell phones. But the most controversial change is that the Wakefield sisters will now be a Size 4 instead of a Size 6. The downsizing of the girls’ much touted tan frames has sparked debates on Feministing.com, as well as at the Dairi Burger site, a blog named after fictitious Sweet Valley’s favorite teen hotspot.

I’ve been unsettled to read comments from visitors to these sites who say that the Sweet Valley series is to blame for their development of eating disorders. The readers say that the books ingrained in them the notion that Size 6 was the ideal. This isn’t surprising because, in each book in the series, the twins’ size and height (5 feet 6) are emphasized. What I’ve forgotten in adulthood, however, is that the books actually contain character after character with dietary habits that fall under the umbrella of bulimia or anorexia. One mother’s use of diet pills during pregnancy is responsible for her daughter being born deaf. And characters constantly criticize each other for doing things like eating full plates of food or looking fat in their jeans. Those who aren’t thin are almost always viewed as being impaired, if not downright sub-human.

Wrote one visitor to the Dairi Burger Web site:

“Here I was, thinking I was the only one who developed an eating disorder after reading SVH. This is fucking hilarious!”

From reading the site’s revisionist retellings of the books, not only does the Sweet Valley High series promote dysfunctional eating, they are also filled with episodes of attempted rape and sexual abuse that are completely forgotten about later. As if that weren’t enough, the books are filled with classist/racist/heterosexist rhetoric.

“I don’t know how she can date him,” a character says about a classmate who is dating a Latino student. “He’s so ethnic and working class.”

WTF? I know that Sweet Valley High got its start in the 1980s, but I’m still shocked that this line made it past the editors.

Later, the series explores the romantic relationship of the twins’ older brother, Steven, and the one black girl in town. In the end, however, Steven and the girl decide that there is no real chemistry between them and ultimately end up—where society dictates they should be—with their own “kinds.” Seems they were only together to make a social statement. What an enlightening commentary on why people enter interracial relationships. They do so to rebel, not because they actually care about each other.

In addition to the lone black girl in town, there is a Latina who passes for white. So ashamed is she of her Mexican heritage that she tells her white friends that her grandmother is her cleaning lady. This sounds like it was lifted straight out of the 1959 film “Imitation of Life.” Anyway, the character ends up revealing her heritage after she is forced to speak Spanish in a life or death situation. Not to worry, though, her friends tell her that they will overlook the fact that she’s a Mexican.

The treatment of sexual orientation in the Sweet Valley series isn’t much better than the treatment of race, as the blogger over at Dairi Burger observes with delicious snarkiness.

“Enid’s cousin Jake comes to visit, and everybody loves him, and Jess and Lila try to get with him. And Tom plays tennis with him and when he is with him, he feels warm and fuzzy …down there. Alas, Jake is GAY!!!! I didn’t think that gays existed in Sweet Valley. Or were allowed to set foot in the town. Enid is a big ol’ homophobe when Jake tells her and Tom gets all weird when he finds out because BAM! suddenly he realizes he is gay.”

God knows what effect this drivel, albeit very entertaining drivel, had on my 10-year-old brain. But the question now isn’t so much about those of us who survived Sweet Valley High when we were little, it’s about the tween girls who will find themselves subject to its messages this time around. Can we expect a new crop of girls to take up bingeing and purging after their initiation into the series, where Size 4 is now the standard of beauty? And how will the new generation of readers counteract the suggestions about the superiority of blue eyes, that it’s only natural for guys to want to date rape their attractive classmates and that anyone who is queer or of color is destined for a life in the margins? Seems to me these books need to contain updates that address more than technological advances. They also need to reflect the advances that have been made in the realms of race, class and gender.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Oh dear, more “white westernized beauty” and culture posts at Racialicious! « Immigration, Assimilation, Ethnicity and All That Jazz on 18 Apr 2008 at 10:39 am

    […] by chinesecanuck on April 18, 2008 Today, it’s on the updated version of Sweet Valley High. OK, so Jessica and Elizabeth Wakefield are slightly-above-average-height, slim, blonde twins. So? […]

Comments

  1. Aaminah wrote:

    I only read a few of the books when I was younger, before moving on to Malcolm X and Richard Wright. My idea of “brainless” reading was Christopher Pike… which in retrospect probably can be torn down as much as SVH. I don’t think I read any of the books that had such overt racism and homophobia (I don’t even remember the twins having a brother much less him dating a black girl, and I am pretty sure I would have reacted to that scenario being handled as it was) in them, but for sure I read alot of sexism and eating issues. Gag… just what the new generation needs… this is one of those “back in my day” things that really should have stayed “back in the day”.

  2. Ailurophile wrote:

    I think there is nothing wrong with fluffy, escapist reading per se. We can’t read Great Litrachoor all the time (and to tell you the truth, I generally prefer escapist fluff to Litrachoor, which often has too great a sense of its own importance. I’m glad my mom the English major isn’t reading this! :) ).

    BUT a book can be fluffy and escapist without being filled with sexist, racist, classist, homophobic messages. I’ve never read the SVH series and just reading about them here makes me cringe.

  3. Michelle wrote:

    I did read the series.

    The beginning of every book I read (I got up to maybe 10) started with a description of the twins. The fact that they are the all American beauty standard is really dangerous for someone who is not the all American beauty standard.

    Here’s the problem. Books, at that age, are intended to teach young people how to dream, imagine, project and form identity. YES, your parents have a lot to do with all of that, but at a certain point, outside influences have to become a part of a child’s life. It is only healthy and natural. So, what if a someone gets these books who is the American beauty standard. Do you think her parents are going to be enlightened enough to say “You mustn’t read that because it only reinforces a White western standard of beauty.”? What kind of relationships is that girl going to have with her peers who fall short of that standard, peers who are either overweight, dark skinned, have short hair, dark hair, full lips, broad noses or thick legs? Think about the impact that these books can have on a generation that is already being fed drivel like Gossip Girl. And that is not even talking about the impact that it could have on the self esteem of a Black girl.

    I read the books and it had a direct impact on my sense of self. I couldn’t figure out why I could never find myself in any of the books that I loved. I switched over to the Roll of Thunder Hear m Cry series. But it still hurt. Cause dammit, I wanted to be included in the SVH world, too! I mean, they had a pool and they were twins! That’s cool!

  4. Nadra wrote:

    Michelle, I love Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry, Let the Circle Be Unbroken and all of Mildred D. Taylor’s books about the Logan family. Those books filled me with so much pride. In 2000 or so, Taylor came out with one of the latest installments about the family, a prequel called The Land. It was also really good. Cheers!

  5. laura wrote:

    Wow. I never read Sweet Valley High, but my friends did. I was in love with the Baby Sitter’s Club (Claudia was my favorite). BSC wasn’t somehow bad without me noticing it, was it?

    …it is supremely messed up that the ‘perfect’ size is a four. Sorry, I’m fixated on this–the other stuff is very bad. I was a woman’s size ten when I was ten (I thought it was cool because for a little while my size and my age were following each other). Preteens shouldn’t be skinny. My mom (a nurse) always made a big deal about how I should eat when I wanted to, because the body needs to take on that extra weight to grow. So I never really freaked out by weight gain. I can’t imagine how I would have reacted if books that I adored were reinforcing the opposite, especially since I had a good four inches and at least 20 pounds on most of my friends. Gah!

  6. Joan Flores wrote:

    I read BSC, too. Actually, I was in their subscription club. I feel like they only skimmed over teen sexuality. The only time I remember the subject of race coming up was in a book about Jessi’s ballet class. No one in her class thought she would be a good Coppelia because she was black, so she gets to be the understudy. But then something happens (deus ex machina?), and she finally gets to dance in the big show and everyone thinks it’s amazing.

    Are kids even reading these kind of books still? I feel like the republished Sweet Valley books might be a huge bomb. It’s so fake-wholesome and unrealistic compared to a real teen’s life. The young adult novel market is extremely popular right now, so it might be hard to break in.

  7. Kaonashi wrote:

    I used to read the books cover to cover (before they went off to college and things got really, really stupid) and I think that the whole point was that even though from the outside their world looked perfect, it was far from that. They tackled a lot of issues that more mainstream books and TV shows wouldn’t even touch at that time. Also, the people saying the more stupid things were the most superficial “mean girl” ignorant characters in the book who hated on EVERYONE.

    What I WILL say is that these books fuck with body images like no one’s business. I remember as a preteen/teen having issues over the whole “perfect size six” thing so for them to make these girls even SMALLER is irresponsible to say the least. The fact that every book starts with reinforcing this makes it worse. :(

  8. Mary wrote:

    “I read BSC, too. Actually, I was in their subscription club. I feel like they only skimmed over teen sexuality. The only time I remember the subject of race coming up was in a book about Jessi’s ballet class. No one in her class thought she would be a good Coppelia because she was black, so she gets to be the understudy. But then something happens (deus ex machina?), and she finally gets to dance in the big show and everyone thinks it’s amazing. ”

    I also remember the book when Jessi first moved to Stoneybrook, the local Welcome Wagon (?) did not go to her house even though they had welcomed all the other new (white) families to the neighborhood. As a kid I was very confused because I had no idea what a Welcome Wagon was, but I got the point.

    As for SVH, it’s hard for me to evaluate them. I start trying to think rationally and then I just start majorly LOLing about Jessica joining a cult, Bruce Patman’s “1BRUCE1″ license plate, or the fact that they named the school dork Winston Eggbert.

    That series was messed up and ridiculous in a lot of ways, but I will admit the phrase “perfect size six” is still imprinted on my brain. So LOLs aside, the messages absolutely do matter.

  9. atlasien wrote:

    I read half of one once. I thought the near-rape scene was incredibly icky and pretty much stopped there. Wow, I had no idea near-rape was such a theme all throughout the series!

    The reader might as well be consuming more honest and straightforward BDSM stuff.

  10. simcha wrote:

    I read this twaddle as a pre-teen. Didn’t pummel my sense of self as a black girl who grew up in a predominately white educational environment. That was the mission of some of my bullying classmates, despite my strongest efforts to make friends and maintain an identity that wouldn’t render me a complete social outcast.

    From my experience, the young people portrayed in these books mirrored the ones I saw everyday — along with their classism, racism, dysfunction, social darwinism, ignorance worship and self-absorption (often at the hands of their strangely permissive parents.) Sometimes, when I was rarely invited to play with a classmate, I envied how “nice” their neighborhoods seemed or the spaciousness of their homes, especially if they had a hot tub, the ultimate 80s leisure good (besides a Porsche 911).

    I didn’t envy them for calling their parents b*tches or a-holes, which happened more than once. One kid’s mother even cried in front of me after my “friend’s” fit, which was profoundly sad. I went home after that.

    Later, I came to realize their values weren’t mine, and so went Sweet Valley. I moved on to “The Learning Tree.” I also have faith in future generations despite the scars inflicted by my own.

    (I don’t remember the SVH book about the Wakefield twins’ older brother and his sistergrrl-friend, but it makes sense that the luddite editors would support a not-so-hidden message that some people need to “stay with their kind.” )

  11. Jenn wrote:

    Wow I never read the SVH books but I did read the Sweet Valley Twins books. They were pretty popular back then.
    I had no idea they had racist stereotypes in SVH, they had tons of the books in my local library which was a black neighborhood and in my black and latino schools

  12. Morgan wrote:

    just to echo what’s been posted here, the perfect size 6 did play a huge role in my mind, as well as the idealization of the blonde/blue eyediness. I do recall feeling like shit and fantasizing about an alternate universe in which I too could look like the Wakefield girls, and be invited to join the Unicorn Club.

    I remember, even in the 4th grade, being struck by the fact that every single character (except the twice a decade “diversity but not really” friend that disappeared in the next book) had a name like “Patman” “Fowler” “Wakefield”—-they didn’t even have a Petrowski or a Minneli, let alone a Gupta, Abramowitz, Castro, Nguyen, etc. In LA!!!! Such propganda!

  13. lunanoire wrote:

    Morgan,

    for realz yo. I am from So Cal and it is amazing how “reality” and scripted tv and movies make it look so white when in LA it’s only a small fraction of neighboroods that are like that. Latinos (esp Mexican Americans) are seriously erased from the picture, as are others- Persians, Asians, etc. OTOH, the circles some ppl socialize in is very white.

  14. thinkingdifference wrote:

    re size, have you read about the new initiative in France against glamorizing the ultra-thin? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080415/ap_on_re_eu/france_anorexia

  15. miss girl wrote:

    omg, i’m so using “He’s so ethnic and working class.” the hell.

  16. Angel H. wrote:

    Never read SVH or SVT. (I was a Nancy Drew girl!)

    Didn’t they have a SVH TV series in the late eighties?

  17. Jha wrote:

    I remember not reading those books when I was a tween. Everyone else was reading them - I was… uh, reading actual romance novels. You know, with the saix and all.

    I’m actually surprised that they’re even bringing it back, because I thought SV was a dying, dying fad. And I’m really concerned, too, about the downsizing of the twins. It doesn’t help that they’re not going to change some societal problems within the books to even make up for this idiocy.

  18. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Angel H. -

    Yep, I read those too - and the Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys supermysteries!

    And yes, I remember the show. When I read Nadra’s post, the theme song got stuck in my head.

  19. Mo wrote:

    I read SVH and BSC fanatically, and do recall BSC being far more intelligent and heartfelt in its discussion of race. I don’t recall sex every coming up in BSC, beyond Mary Ann kissing Logan on the lips for the first time, and the fact that M-A and Logan had to sit on the porch, not inside, if the dad wasn’t home.

    I remember Jessi dealing with racism, the Coppelia and Welcome Wagon incidents. To my childhood mind, I recall being really upset along with Jessi as she tried to figure out how to deal with her anger. It’s incredibly improbable (such wide-open racism in suburban CT?) but I think it dealt with at least the idea of racism in a way a 12-year-old is capable of understanding. I know it was good for me as a kid to read about Jessi’s black family and Claudia’s Japanese one, and reading about each girl’s struggles with race and culture. Even if the racism wasn’t terribly subtle or nuanced, it let me think about racism at all — which, in turn, would later help me reach a point where I COULD be nuanced and put words to the much smaller, more subtle aggravations most minorities deal with on a daily basis.

    As for SVH, ugh. A lot of good would be done if they just removed the word “perfect” from those descriptions. I remember that Elizabeth had “flawless, shapely” legs when she wore leggings, which “clung” to her “every curve.” My own leggings were usually pretty stretched out and baggy, and my body was the shape of a stick of a gum– flat and straight. No matter what the idea is, someone feels left out. As unlikely and comically proportioned as the BSC diversity rainbow was, at least no one girl (or two identical ones! Aryan clones) was the “perfect” one.

    The twin thing was the greater fantasy. I don’t recall wanting to be blonde, but I do recall wanting to have someone else exactly like me, so I would not be alone.

  20. Mo wrote:

    * It occurs to me that the thing with Mary Ann and Logan sitting on the porch was a function of Mary Ann growing up in a one-parent household. Looking back, that BSC rainbow brigade was actually pretty wide. There was no “perfect” family: The first sunny blonde was diabetic, which turned into an opportunity to think about food concerns in the context of health (not appearance) and the second blonde was a bicoastal child of divorce, who later became Mary Ann’s stepsister: an exploration of blended families.

  21. Keke wrote:

    I read a few SVH books growing up, but I remember reading a series of books about girls who were the complete opposite of the blonde-haired, blue-eyed, perfectly put together paradigm. I can’t remember the authors but I fell in love with a book about a girl who wasn’t blonde or blue-eyed and was a total klutz. She had to learn to accept herself for who she was and still ended up respected and admired.

    I even started reading a book that was a “choose your own adventure” where the main character got into a really rigid program and had to choose between taking honors chemistry or breaking down gender barriers and taking an auto shop class. After all those books that questioned gender and social expectations, SVH seemed trivial and droll in comparison. Jessica seemed like a sociopath to me; she was constantly scheming, lying, and using her looks to get ahead. Even at my young age, I remember thinking to myself, “Some misguided young girl is going to read this book try really hard to become just like Jessica.” I could only shudder to think about all the future “Jessicas” I would meet because of those books.

  22. Rhys wrote:

    Perhaps I’m a bit younger than the SVH readers who experienced body image problems as a result of the series, but when I read the books as a pre-teen in the late 90s, they were already so dated that they had lost a lot of their potency. (No one I knew wanted to look like the girls on the cover with feathered bangs and high-waisted stonewashed jeans.) The fact that Random House is updating the series to make it culturally relevant again is therefore extremely troubling.

  23. Clara wrote:

    I was definitely a huge fan of the SV series, although I was first exposed to it through the tv series. I am Chinese-American, and I think as a preteen, I was conscious enough of my ethnicity to realize that the aesthetic values of the blue-eyed, blond twins didn’t apply to me simply because I wasn’t white. I wasn’t bothered that the twins didn’t look like me and it didn’t make any sense to envy their “perfect looks” because I knew that it just wasn’t possible for me to naturally grow blond hair. (I guess I was had a somewhat developed Asian-American consciousness as a kid.) From that, I also was comfortable with disregarding the messed up beauty ideals in the series. I didn’t apply the “perfect size six” phrase to myself…

    Or so I thought at the time. In retrospect, however, that phrase probably did subconsciously affect the way I saw my body. Now that I’m dwelling on this series, I can definitely remember thinking the phrase “perfect size six” whenever I went shopping for jeans. So I guess these beauty ideals impacted me more than I thought they did.

    To echo everyone else, it’s appalling to see that they’re changing the phrase to “perfect size four.”

    I also read the Baby-sitter’s Club as a preteen. I remember looking at Claudia and marveling that she wasn’t being written as the Model Minority Asian, as my schoolmates thought of me.

  24. trene wrote:

    Oh my poor 10 year old self! I read SVH, Baby Sitters Club and The Pen Pals religiously. Every Friday my mom hauled me to Tower Books where I spent hours looking for myself in these series.

    Growing up in Seattle didn’t help this situation. I was heart broken and sobbing when I recently found out the author of The Pen Pals was black and from South East DC. That discovery made me feel robbed of an opportunity to have read about black girls at boarding school writing to their male counterparts across town. Why couldn’t I have been included there? The author was black afterall! I figure the publisher (Yearling) didn’t think black girls in boarding school was realistic enough; that I didn’t exist. I can imagine how reading about smart, daydreaming girls like me would have bolstered my fractured self esteem as I endured the “your an oreo taunts” of my black peers and repeat dismissals by my white classmates.

    I finally gave up on the mainstream series after reading more Super Specials and Summer Sizzle’s than any child should consume and was finally at peace when I discovered Rosa Guy and devoured Ruby and Esther’s tale of life in Harlem.

    The SHV ideal of All American blonde’s should stay in the annals of history. No tech updates will erase the invisibility of Black and Brown in Sweet Valley, regardless of what dress size the Wakefield twins are now.

  25. Heather wrote:

    Ok, I will be the devil’s advocate (to an extent). Isn’t the drop from “perfect size 6″ to “perfect size 4″ simply a result of vanity sizing? Meaning - what is called a “size 4″ now is equivalent to what was called a “size 6″ then, because Americans are, on-the-average, heavier. I think the focus on eating habits and anti-fat sentiment is more damning than just the size numbers, but everyone seems to be latching on to the “size 4″ thing.

  26. radhika wrote:

    i thought SVH was really stupid when i was a kid. i never read it, oddly enough. the magic tree house series was awesome, and so was junie b. jones. i also remember reading the “teacher as a monster” series where in each book the kids think their teacher is a werewolf/gremlin/whatever.

  27. Kat wrote:

    Re: Race and the BSC series: I still remember very clearly a book in the series where one of the babysitting clients is obviously racist. First one of the white sitters works for her, and is impressed by how wonderful and polite the family is. When Claudia goes to sit, the mother is extremely curt and rude to her, and the children are more difficult–I think it’s even implied they are giggling about her eyes. Then when Jessie goes to sit, the mother is rude, looks shocked, tells her they don’t need a sitter anymore, and slams the door in her face.
    I remember there is discussion within the club about what Claudia could’ve done wrong, if she was dressed to wildly, and then Jessie tries to make a wonderful impression and when she realizes what happened she still seems to think it was something she did wrong. It was a pretty good reflection of the confusion and shame a young person might feel over racism, from what I do remember.
    In general, the solutions the club had to those problems were too general and the discussion wasn’t very in depth, but that was also a result of the idealism in the books. Every problem could be solved within a book, even racism.

  28. Constintina wrote:

    SVH definitely ingrained size 6 = perfect in my head, even though I never took the books seriously–I read them as campy. Regina does blow once and dies. That sort of thing. I hadn’t remembered all the racism beyond that Sweet Valley was all-aryan (though I wasn’t a completist and def. missed Steven’s interracial romance! Wowzers.)

    Alot of those books were f-ed. BSC was probably the best of the bunch, and the spin off California Diaries rocked. If it had lasted longer I’m sure Ducky would have actually come out (they had him pointedly reading Oscar Wilde fer god’s sake…)

    Anyway. Yeah. Disturbing.

  29. marge twain wrote:

    @Heather, yes, vanity sizing is at work here, as is the new paradigm of VERY thin=beautiful. Think of the stars from the 80’s and early 90’s:Gloria Estefan, Madonna, Cyndi Lauper, Tiffany, Cindy Crawford, Claudia Schiffer. Heifers by today’s standards, I’m sorry to say.

    The problem is that they’re described as the “perfect” size and that their blue eyes and blond hair and white skin are emphasized as the epitome of desirability.

    It really did a number on me as a kid to read these books that were supposed to be for girls, yet described the twins’ bodies in lush detail. Of course I wanted to be them, or Barbie or at least the same color as the now infamous “skin color” crayon.

    I was a kid who read everything but I never read another book that so explicitly spelled out what it took to be female and belong in American society.

  30. patti wrote:

    I agree with Constantina - I was in middle school and high school when these were popular and already I sort of knew that teen series fiction was just purely for entertainment and a quick easy read. Even as a young girl, I remember being really surprised at how much time, according to these books, that older girls spent worrying about what they were wearing and about boys.
    I am a little surprised to find out that there were some very serious readers of these series and then, knowing that, would hope the publishers and authors would try to be a little more responsible to an impressionable pre-teen audience.

  31. Michelle wrote:

    GO MARGE!!!!!!

    EXCELLENT!!!!!

    And Mo, I used to live in suburban CT (and was an avid fan of the BSC) and racism, overt covert and down right dirty, are alive and well. Actually, the Klan held a huge meeting there in the nineties. It was rural CT, but not to far from Hartford.

  32. Lady S wrote:

    I read the series as a pre-teen. Whilst the ‘perfect size 6′ never really affected me because it’s an American sizing and thus had no measurable reality, but the ‘perfect’ being alongside ‘blonde’ - oh yes, that was bad.

  33. dalia wrote:

    god, i don’t remember any racist rhetoric in these books at all, but i remember growing very tired of them when i got to book #39… i have them all, and now i want to go back and read to see how blatantly ignorant the writing was. that makes them all seem so much more exciting and interesting now, instead of just about the trivialities in the life of two perfectly-sized blonde girls out of california.

    awesome!

  34. Folklore Fanatic wrote:

    I used to be obsessed with those books. I thought I had read all of them up to #110 or something, but apparently I missed some, or else my memory has blocked out the sexual abuse parts (Hur…ray?).

    Who was abused/nearly raped? I honestly don’t remember that in the middle school books (in SVU, definitely).

    @ 9. atlasien : What book are you talking about?

  35. Nadra wrote:

    Jessica and Elizabeth both were nearly raped on more than one occasion. Visit The Dairi Burger site for more info. Actually, Feministing discusses this issue, too. Click on the links I provided in the article. Thanks.

  36. Lisa S wrote:

    I don remember a line about the way to tell the twins apart was one had “flecks” of green in her blue eyes

  37. Lisa S wrote:

    Oh and also the mother wore her hair in a “page boy” which I never had any idea what that was

  38. atlasien wrote:

    I have no idea what book it was, and I never read more than that one book. All I remember was the manipulative sexy twin thought she was so smart manipulating some hot guy with manipulative sexy flirting but he “cornered her” and “wouldn’t take no for an answer” and she had to “break free” before he “took too many liberties” so her manipulation failed and she “learned a lesson”. It was icky and corny at the same time.

  39. Deathycat wrote:

    I read nearly all of SVH when I was a kid and still love the series even now. I never thought they were that bad. They played off of racial stereotypes and it just seemed to be written more with ignorance than racism.

    As for the whole body image thing it never really affected me. I always took the “perfect size six” as being that they were perfect for being a size six, not that size six the perfect size. I think I’m the only one that did, though. But then, I always took everything literally.

    I’m glad they’re updating the series. I read the new ones and they’re much better written than the old ones. They label the twins with the whole perfect size four figure but drop the whole spew at the beginning about how perfect their hair was, their legs were, etcetera. The cut the stupid twintros from two pages to a mere paragraph or two in both books just to do the general description.

  40. sarah wrote:

    I didn’t read too many of the SVH series, but I read enough for the “perfect size 6″ to be ingrained into my psyche. I was dismayed to hear that the updates had slimmed the twins to a size 4; I understand that an ’80s size 6 and a ’00s size 4 are probably comparable, but is a 6 really “imperfect” in the 21st century? If so, that’s pretty sad. Even sadder is the fact that Random House was so proud of this revision that they announced it in their press release. As someone who was in double digits by the time she reached puberty, the difference between a size 4 and 6 was negligible even then — either way, the Wakefield twins represented an unattainable ideal. I understand the concept of “escapism,” but that doesn’t mean that the characters in a series of novels for young girls should be so completely unrelatable. How many girls, exactly, are 5′6″, a “perfect size 6″ (or 4) and have blonde hair and blue eyes? I’m guessing not very many. I really hate that this has been held up as the ideal of beauty for so long. I see beautiful women nearly every day of my life, and pretty much none of them look like this.
    I agree with the previous poster who predicts that the SVH relaunch might be a bomb — YA these days is a much richer market and much better written than it was when I was actually a “young adult.” Here’s hoping that even the “modernized” version of SVH doesn’t stand the test of time.

  41. Angela wrote:

    I was BIG on the Sweet Valley Twins–how did I miss all of this stuff? I feel pretty odd because nothing about this series made me feel inadequate– I was just so happy to be able to escape my day to day drama with a book that I couldn’t see it as anything but pure entertainment. Hm..guess I’ll have to go revisit the books to view them from a twentysomething standpoint.

  42. Kari wrote:

    I read Christopher Pike when I was a tween. When I was younger, I read the Girl Talk series, which I don’t remember being too bad. I could never get into SVH. It sounds like I am lucky. I think that they should, not only, forget about re-releasing the SVH series, they should ban children from ever reading the originals either. They sound just horrible.

  43. SolShine7 wrote:

    I remember reading the Sweet Valley High books when I little and I didn’t catch any of this stuff. When you’re a little girl books about twins are must-reads. I sure hope that Pascal’s books really aren’t that bad from an adult perspective.

  44. Miss Rain wrote:

    I read a few of the SVH books…I even still have the prom thriller ones somewhere (Elizabeth kills Jessica’s boyfriend, Jessica is “heartbroken” but manages to live with the fact it was all her fault…?), and I have to say they were gloriously addictive, in their drama-fluff way. Oddly enough I never developed issues concerning my size but then I live in a bubble that exists outside of this weight-obsessed society (this bubble being a town verging on city in Britain where me and all my friends are, and always have been, mostly happy with our flabby bits..) I did notice how EVERY character was beautiful, and if they weren’t it was because they were fat, and if they were fat they usually lost weight and MAGICALLY TURNED INTO SUPER-GORGEOUS CHEERLEADERS! But the lives depicted in the stories were so different to the lives I could clearly see that it never bothered me.
    But ‘perfect size 4′? The author is deluded.

  45. kirsten wrote:

    Any person who blames the SVH series for his or her eating disorder has problems that stretch far beyond the reach of the books.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.