Double the Offense: Chinese Laundry and the Boston Herald Blog

by Racialicious Special Correspondent Latoya Peterson

What is this ad selling?

What is this ad selling?

Finally, what is this ad selling?

All three of these ads claim to be selling Chinese Food, but obviously one of these things is not like the others.

I was only loosely following the Chinese Laundry story that Jenn broke over on Reappropriate. A quick summary:

In a story that seems to come straight out of a movie, gentrification of a neighbourhood in Providence, Rhode Island has forced a long-time Chinese laundry to close after 13 years of business.

[…]

But, what’s really interesting about this story is that the Chow Fun Food Group, which has moved into the gentrified neighbourhood, is running with the tradition of a Chinese laundry in that location by opening a new Asian fusion restaurant called, creatively, “Chinese Laundry“.

The third ad displayed at the beginning of the post was their promotional advertisement.

As I was late catching up on my blogreading, I figured the time for the petition had passed. I had also seen the post pop up on blogs like Angry Asian Man and Feministing, so I figured most people had it covered.

However, somewhere along the line things took a turn for the nasty, and Jenn has been dealing with some of that fallout.

Jenn has been really taking the lead to focus on the Asian-American community and methods by which to peacefully advocate for change. Awesome Jenn, keep working.

Now, I wish that this was the end of this piece. But oh no, I followed an outgoing link to the article Jenn references was published by the Boston Herald. (It was actually on the Inside Track Blog).

And what I found there made me even angrier than the ad.

The article in reference is now archived. It mentions the controversy that occurred, but not so much Jenn’s reasons for objecting. Instead the article decided to have fun with food, starting with “What would really fry [Jenn’s] noodle” while discussing the opening party, featuring nyotaimoiri - you know, to roll all the imagery together.

The blog writer (who was not identified of the three main authors) identifies a few of the phrases Jenn used in her original critique but twists them almost to the point of mockery.

For example, after quoting “The advertisement implies that diners of this restaurant will be able to conquer the East, not only gastronomically, but sexually,” the writer flippantly remarks “Well, what if you just want a bowl of chow fun?”

Does anyone here look at the Chinese Laundry ad and think “Oh, yum, chow fun?” That is not what that ad is selling.

What makes me so angry is that we see this kind of attitude that is dismissive of women and minorities all the time.

Even with an ad as egregious as this one, where there is blatantly obvious objectification, where the only way the ad works is when it plays off of ingrained stereotypes about Asian American women being both sexually submissive and available, it astounded me to see this issue trivialized and dismissed as political correctness run amok.

And I am really tired of people acting like the critiques that Asian-Americans have about their images in the media are ridiculous or unfounded.

So, instead of just being pissed about it, I decided to write a letter.

Here is what I wrote the the Boston Herald:

Your Inside Track article published on March 10, titled “New Asian eatery’s wanton ad leaves bad taste for some” was ridiculously dismissive about a very serious subject. The Chinese Laundry marketing campaign is offensive from a feminist standpoint and from a racial standpoint, which is complicated by the fact that an actual Chinese-run laundry service was evicted to make room for this restaurant.

While we can understand how the owner was trying to go for edgy and sexy, the end result was offensive and I am glad the campaign was pulled.

As an African-American woman, I am shocked to see that the writers of Inside Track were so blind to the racist and sexist ideas needed to make this ad campaign work that they chose to target the analysis on Reappropriate rather than the actual image itself.

Please inform your writers that feigning ignorance of racial issues and feminist issues does not make them funny or cool. I was already disappointed with the ad campaign - I really did not need to be disappointed by some half-ass short item on a major newspaper site.

In the future, I hope your writers will actually read the blog posts they choose to critique. Who knows, they may have actually learned something.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Monday links » Eric Stoller’s Blog on 31 Mar 2008 at 10:38 pm

    […] “Double the Offense: Chinese Laundry and the Boston Herald Blog” — Latoya Peterson Tag: links […]

Comments

  1. Carmen Van Kerckhove wrote:

    Great letter, Latoya! I’m so glad you wrote to them.

  2. Lisa wrote:

    Thanks for summarizing this, Latoya. I continue to be shocked and awed by the double-hit of racism and misogyny in the original ad and in the follow-ups. While the ProJo response was predictable, I had higher expectations of the BoGlo.

    New England is a strange place. The unis bring in this wonderful diversity of young people who are progressive activists - sometime to an extreme. (I was at Brown during the “Wall of Shame” incident, and even as a in-your-face progressive the extremes left a bad taste that only reading blogs like this has erased.)

    On the other hand, the uni crowds rarely interact with the “natives” - even if they stay in the area after graduating. The educated economic elite, they contribute to the area’s gentrification, while the “native” political elite continues to be these Irish- and Italian-American Good ol’ Boys.

    I really don’t know what college activism is like these days. Ideally this incident could result in some sort of dialogue, but I don’t think it is. The racists and misogynists are too defensive and entrenched, and we progressives - well, I at least, get rendered spluttering or speechless about how idiotically ignorant people are.

    Living in China and avoiding non-Mandarin speaking whities means the only well-meaning bigot I regularly deal with is my grandma. But, I spent last Christmas in the US, specifically in La Jolla. Which is 30% ethnic Asian, predominantly Taiwanese and Persian. So I was floored when I walked into this store http://www.mosmyownspace.com and saw the 1950s-esque “China Doll” Mr & Mr Chin Series, http://www.mosmyownspace.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=2645&Category_Code=kitchen-bar. (Which is tame compared to Chinese Laundry.) After gawping for a few minutes, I confronted a staffer that it was offensive.

    He countered me, “Well, offensiveness is a matter of taste, I find reality TV offensive,” and, “A lot of Asians come in and think it’s cute.” I spluttered incoherently that it was a racist stereotype AND that objectifying that racist stereotype into culinary utensil added to the obnoxiousness.

    However, Oblivious Whities don’t realize such things without the context, and they (we) immediately wax defensive. For example, I didn’t know until reading it here the background of “ching-chong”, and it takes explaining for a lot of even liberal whites to understand the problems with words like “exotic” and “Oriental”.

    Anyhow, I applaud Jenn’s and Latoya’s eloquent expositions. Thanks for the examples of how to do it - and how to remain cool under fire.

  3. RoslynHolcomb wrote:

    What in the hell? This is absolutely outrageous. Why on earth would a restaurant use the torso of a naked woman to sell food?

  4. atlasien wrote:

    It’s frustrating how so many people refuse to believe that Asian women actually don’t like being treated like faceless objects of consumption.

  5. Tk wrote:

    Just to clarify Lisa-

    The Boston Globe didn’t publish the article, it was the Boston Herald. The Boston Herald is a cheap tabloid newspaper that sells itself with outrageous articles like the one mentioned in this post. The Globe would never publish crap like that, but the Herald is known for it. You’d be happy to know that the Herald’s circulation numbers have been dwindling, most likely because of it’s crudeness and bad quality. As a multiracial person who grew up in the Boston area, I felt the need to add the inside view! I think that Boston still suffers from the stereotypes incurred from the 1970’s busing debacle (my parents lived through it). The city and surrounding areas are more diverse than some might think.

  6. Jessie wrote:

    I LOVE Racialicious and definitely agree with you on the entire issue surrounding Chinese Laundry, but I thought that, as a Boston resident, I’d give you a quick heads up:

    The Boston Herald is Boston’s low-rent equivalent of the NY Post. They publish this kind of asshattery on a daily basis and are fully aware of the reactions they’re going to get. I don’t condone this type of “journalism” AT ALL, but I’ve come to realize that the paper prints these kinds of articles SO sensible people will be outraged and publicize the paper.

  7. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    It’s pretty glaringly obvious that the folks who own the Chinese Laundry restaurant are using racist sexist stereotypes about all Asian women being submissive human sex toys for White men to promote their restaurant.

    The fact that the Providence Journal AND the Boston Herald both esssentially defended this restaurant - and attacked the activist who called Chinese Laundry’s owners on their racist sexism - says volumes about how misogyny and White supremacism are still alive and well in the “liberal” US media

  8. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Thanks TK & Jessie -

    The Boston Globe is a much better paper - I have enjoyed their articles for some time now.

    But the Herald? Blech! I wanted to copy and paste from the actual blog post, but they archive everything after 10 days.

    And I know they were not getting my $3.50.

  9. The Cruel Secretary wrote:

    It’s official: I have an e-crush on Latoya.:-D Your letter was brilliantly on-point. A bouquet of thanks.

    Lisa, Tk, and Jessie–thank you for reminding me why I moved from Boston to Brooklyn.;-)

  10. Linda wrote:

    I don’t understand how anyone could NOT find that add offensive.

    What makes it even more disturbing to me is that it looks like the cover of a book that could be about human trafficking. The position the female is in just seems so subordinate (almost like she’s a sex slave). It creeps me out, cause I know that there are women and children who are sold into that industry.

  11. donna darko wrote:

    Man that picture is creepy. I”m glad the restaurant took it down.

  12. Lola wrote:

    @ LINDA that is EXACTLY what I thought about when I saw this add, human trafficking!!!!

    @ Latoya you did a great great job with the letter!!!

    @ Carmen, I saw some of your videos on YT/NewDemo channel. You’re amazing!

    I just wanted to say, I still consider myself new to this site, but you have no idea how much I respect the work of the whole team. Keep up the good work everyone. I love Racialicious.

  13. jmn wrote:

    Latoya, you rock!

  14. Kiss Kiss Beauty wrote:

    I agree with all previous comments that Ms. Peterson’s letter was incendiary! (Recalling ‘Almost Famous.’ :) I am new to this blog, but not to these issues, and it’s GREAT to read so many thoughtful, nuanced blog posts and comments from readers. There is hope yet.

  15. Sudy wrote:

    Latoya,
    I’m so glad you wrote that to the Boston Herald. I mean, really, what in the world did they expect with writing those kinds of comments that mocked Jenn’s critical analysis?

    It left me steaming.

    Right/Write on.

  16. Taylor wrote:

    Uh, Latoya, I’m not sure if you noticed but none of those ads concern actual Chinese food.

  17. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Taylor,

    LOL, yes I know, American Style Chinese is not the same as Chinese food. However, I needed to illustrate that the picture was not selling food at all - the model isn’t even holding a bowl. Nothing to even indicate eating.

    And I have reservations about this place anyway as the only thing I have heard about the food is Naked Sushi. Maybe they should just change their name from “Chinese Laundry” to “Asian Appropriation Station.”

  18. Cynthia wrote:

    I have a question: In the US, it seems that the Chinese restaurants that get the most marketing aren’t really Chinese restaurants, but Chinese American. It’s not the case up here in Canada. Two of the top places up here are Lai Wah Heeand Lai Toh Heen (yes the two are owned by the same people), and while they DO often serve non-Chinese clientele (especially Lai Toh Heen), the food isn’t usually about chop suey. Chop suey is usually found in take-out places. I don’t seem to see places like Lai Wah Heen or Lai Toh Heen in New York (and I go to NY a lot). Maybe there are lots in San Francisco or LA though.

  19. Cynthia wrote:

    ^^^ the first restaurant is Lai Wah Heen, not Lai Wah Hee. Oops!

  20. Colin wrote:

    Cynthia: What was the question?

    Latoya: So did the Herald change the article online? I ask because I looked last night and saw a tiny little ditty of a blurb that was so nondescript I couldn’t tell who or what happened nor why it was reported on.

    Great article and it’s inspiring that you wrote such an impassioned letter to the Herald. Maybe you changed some minds there about the article or maybe they found that they were caught, either way, it LOOKS like the article was changed so that people wouldn’t get so outraged about it anymore, so I guess that’s a victory.

  21. Cynthia wrote:

    Question was: How come it seems that most Chinese restaurants that cater to chop suey and fortune cookie crowd while you don’t necessarily get that up here (see my links….both restaurants have a large non-Asian following, yet it’s not about chop suey)…chop suey is pretty much found only at a take-out/mall food court type of restaurant.

  22. DivergentDana wrote:

    Probably because the percentage of Asians in Canada is twice as large as in the U.S., and they’re among the most prominent racial minority groups in Canada, possibly leading to an increased demand for authentic Asian culinary fare. That, and Americanizing ethnic food is a pretty time-honored tradition in the states. (Taco Hell, anyone?) Additionally, the Asian population is heavily concentrated on the coasts, so in “flyover country”/the “American heartland” where I live, Chinerican food’s pretty much all there is and all that there’s a demand for. Hell, we’re just getting used to sushi.

  23. Dee Dee wrote:

    The text on the second ad seems to be the message of the third one. Sick.

    Thanks for posting this. When I think of restaurants, I think of places people go on dates, yet it’s hard for me to imagine how any woman of any race would want to be taken to dine at a restaurant advertising itself this way, with a partner of any gender. That the ad ‘feeds’ into stereotypes about Asian and Asian-American women is doubly sickening.

    It’s downright scary that people can’t seem to engage in the most mundane of activities - say, eating - without exploiting racism and sexism. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised at this point, but I am disappointed.

  24. The Cruel Secretary wrote:

    @Cynthia–
    Let me see if I can rephrase Colin’s question to a statement. Love ya, but I think your comments may be derailing the topic.

    I don’t think the Latoya’s post is the difference between what’s on the menus of Canadian Chinese restaurants versus American-style Chinese restaurants. If I’m not mistaken, I think it’s about the effed-up racist and sexist imagery of the Chinese Laundry ad, the outrage it caused, and how the outrage became activism–in Latoya’s case, her writing a letter to the crap-tastic Boston Herald. Latoya herself stated that the images she chose contrasted the difference in the food ad and underlined how truly jaink the Chinese Laundry ad is.

    There’s a book that just came out, Jennifer 8 Lee’s “The Fortune Cookie Chronicles: Adventures in the World of Chinese Food, ” that may be able to answer your question. I know it’s available on Amazon.com:

    http://www.amazon.com/Fortune-Cookie-Chronicles-Adventures-Chinese/dp/0446580074/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1206648507&sr=1-1

  25. Cynthia C wrote:

    Cruel Secretary,

    My question was actually totally off topic…was just wondering.

    OK…back to our regularly scheduled program.

  26. Jay wrote:

    In Toronto, you actually have enough Chinese wanting actual Chinese food to prevent it from happening, but if you get out to the boonies there will be more Canadian Chinese food.

    Oh yeah, I thought the Chinese Laundry place thingy was a fusion food restaurant, so that’s the other difference. Most restaurants don’t get fusion food right - they’ll do things just because it’s new and not because it tastes good.

    Dee Dee, I’ve gone to restaurants with friends, large groups and small. It doesn’t necessarily have to be a date place, but I couldn’t imagine taking any date to that place with that kind of advertisement either.

    And Americanizing _everything_ is a time-honoured tradition in the States. From movies (The Departed) to games to food to music, etc.

  27. Fawn wrote:

    In addition to all the other praise of your letter Latoya, I especially appreciated the last 2 sentences–not only were they right on, but I got a nice chuckle out of them. Thanks!

  28. Lisa S. wrote:

    I really appreciate this post! A lot of times I read the posts on this blog and I think, this is an interesting discussion but what can we DO? Nice to see that you took the time to write in.

  29. Miri wrote:

    I have also been following this issue, however distantly, from when I last saw it on AngryAsianMan. Unfortunately, sexuality seems to inevitably weave itself into any kind of advertising for the sake of attracting attention. But it saddens me in particular to think that businesses would have to pander to sexual stereotypes of African, Asian, and Latina women because they believe that is what the public wants. Latoya, I would like to thank you for writing that letter to the Boston Herald. I believe that it is of the utmost importance that minority groups speak up for each other’s rights, instead of remaining divided over issues. I think that we will find that working together is much more conducive to change.

  30. Kurt wrote:

    @Cynthia -
    The restaurants you mentioned look good, although I wouldn’t say they’re something you couldn’t find in a large American city. Here are a couple places in NY, from a brief web search-
    http://www.buddakannyc.com/
    http://www.shunleepalace.com/newyork/
    (though I can’t vouch for them) Have you tried Chinatown or Queens?

    It is true though, that we have a long tradition of lousy Chinese food in the US. I think it is maybe because Chinese cuisine really proliferated back in the 50’s, or earlier, when people’s tastes were more towards an Americanized, fast-food style. So Chinese restaurants have captured a certain niche in the US (alongside burgers, pizza, etc) even though there are a lot more authentic Asian restaurants these days.

  31. Cynthia wrote:

    Kurt,

    Yes, I have tried NYC’s Chinatown, but they aren’t really anything special either (besides, NYC’s Chinatown is just as “dirty” as Toronto’s…actually, maybe even more so. In Toronto, Chinatown is pretty much only for business people, tourists, students from the University of Toronto and Ryerson University and perhaps young downtown dwellers. People who grew up in the suburbs and those with family would head out to Scarborough or Markham.) I have also been to Shun Lee, and it’s not as “authentic” as some of the places in Chinatown. New York’s population is much, much bigger than Toronto’s, yet they have fewer “good” Chinese places! I have family in NYC and they seem to say that outside of Chinatown and Queens, NYC is about 20-25 years behind San Francisco, Vancouver and Toronto in terms of Chinese food.

    BTW, Lai Toh Heen isn’t as “authentic” as Lai Wah Heen. The former is more along the lines of semi-fusion (though it leans more towards the Chinese side).

  32. Melissa wrote:

    it bloody exists everywhere!

    i just moved to new zealand from canada and i stumbled up this restaurant here in wellington:
    http://www.monsoonpoon.co.nz/welcome.htm

    yeah. the tag line for the restaurant is: “love you long time”.
    i shit you not.

    plus, its called monsoon poon.

    fuck that shit.

  33. TJ wrote:

    What’s more insulting is that on the same site there used to be a laundry service ran by a Chinese family that was eventually evicted when the building was sold. Historically, Chinese immigrants were discriminated against and therefore limited to jobs viewed as menial and effeminate.

  34. Jessica wrote:

    Does anyone else find the Chinese Laundry ad eerily reminiscent of the photographs of women featured in The Rape of Nanking?

    This is a photograph of a woman bound to a chair for repeated rape (warning: explicit):
    http://thesaturnalia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/rape1.jpg

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.