Has Class Trumped Race? Part 3 - Acknowleding Privilege

by Racialicious Special Correspondent Latoya Peterson

As we have seen in the last two posts, privilege is difficult to define.

There is a material aspect to privilege. There is the issue of access to opportunities. There is also the issue of perception of privilege.

One of the main characteristics of privilege is that people generally are unaware of their privilege. Obviously, if you are not disadvantaged in an area, you generally don’t spare extra time thinking about how to fix something that isn’t broken. We tend to focus more on our personal struggles - not where we have personally benefited from someone else’s labor.

During the first two posts, I tried to refrain from making any value judgments about the examples I provided to you. I simply explained a situation. Why? Because the perception of my privilege changes.

Here’s a scenario that was not covered in the assessment:

I grew up in Montgomery County, MD. Since my parents could not afford many of the basic necessities, I was often tasked to help out with household expenses. When I was twelve years old, I watched two children after school and was paid $100 dollars a week. That was mostly taken by my mother, who needed the funds for household expenses. As I got older, school costs mounted. I worked to support myself. My mother provided me with no money for transportation, school clothes, AP assessments, SAT costs or other school expenses. So, there was a period of time in high school where I worked about 30 hours a week to pay for all the things that my friends took for granted. I never got a driver’s license because the costs to get one ($50 for the learners; $250 for driving school; time off from work to take the courses) were too high. I also passed on a lot of wonderful opportunities - like out of town trips - because I could not afford the fees.

Based on the above scenario, would you consider me privileged?

In the eyes of my friends, I was not privileged. My problems were very different from the problems that they knew. I had no expectation of a car when I turned sixteen. I often had no money on me at school, while their parents either gave them allowances or provided cash on demand. Some of my friends worked on the weekends, if at all. None of my friends ever had to contribute funds to the household. Some of my friends took the SAT four times, to maximize their best score. Their parents continued to pay for them to take and retake the test, as well as paying for schools like Kaplan. They could not fathom why I only took the test once.

In the eyes of my cousins, I was ridiculously privileged. I went to school in Montgomery County, where “everyone talks proper.” We had very good schools and free resources. Our schools never shut down because of disrepair or teacher furloughs. At the age of twelve, I was in a position to make $100 a week. I did not ever have to go without a job in school, because not only were jobs plentiful, but safe and easy for me to access. I was able to work a shift from 5:00 PM - 10:00 PM nightly and walk home without the fear of being accosted. I led an extracurricular filled life, with teachers who cared enough about my personal development to tell me about opportunities like Teen Court, Mock Trial, State SGA, Speech Team. I had friends with money and cars and access and they were able to loan me money if I was in a tight spot, or to drive me around when I needed to get somewhere.

We had gotten food from a food bank once that I can remember, but my sister and I never went hungry, like my cousins did. We never had to recycle one bowl of milk so that everyone could eat some cereal in the morning. We never had to deal with a drug addicted parent, as some of our friends did. We never had to deal with that parent inviting people in the house who wanted to sexually abuse us, like some of our friends did. My parents were young, but determined and intelligent. I never had to deal with a parent with a welfare mentality.* While I did have to deal with a depressed parent, I have never had to deal with a parent who was defeated by life.

In the eyes of my cousins - and some friends from childhood - my sister and I were privileged as fuck.

This is why Atlasien’s comment from Part 1 resonated so strongly with me:

My family took a very erratic trajectory through life. We had almost no material possessions and no housing from age 0-6, a privileged middle-class existence ages 6-15, then a sharp dive downwards after a business loss that meant I had to support myself through college.

Overall, though, my immediate family definitely had middle-class privilege. I know that other members of my family (on several completely different sides) grew up in dire poverty and experienced true desperation, hunger and even malnutrition. I’m not going to pretend my temporary hardships were close to what they went through. I had a lot more choices than they did.

Going back and forth on this kind of economic merry go round gives me this very strange, in between sense of privilege. On one hand, I can see very clearly where there were things that I lacked in life that would have helped me to get a leg up. On the other hand, I can also see how things could have been much, much worse. I lucked up in the cosmic crapshoot. I could have the exact same personality, intelligence, and tenacity that I have now, but if I was born to either of my aunts my life circumstances would have been completely different.

All told, I may have lacked in material privilege, but I was able to get access to understand what I was missing; and what I needed to succeed. I also developed one of the other parts of privilege: entitlement.

Entitlement plays a strong role in how we perceive and shape the world. This is why we see people (in the various discussions of the meme) say things like “It isn’t my fault that my parents cared about me enough to do their jobs.” Or “I earned everything I have.” We feel entitled to having “good” parents and entitled to our understanding of the world: where if you work hard and make the most of what you have, you will succeed. This kind of entitlement continues because this is what has been reinforced in our lives, that these things are true, and that if you apply effort to x task, y will happen.

Think about the Penelope Trunk example I referenced in Part 2 (emphasis mine):

But before I launch into a celebration of Sofia Coppola, I need to say that the U.S. is not a meritocracy: Rich people are better connected, so they get better jobs. And rich people who are not well connected tend to get better jobs because they have an easier time envisioning themselves in a successful career than poorer people. An example: My younger brother, now 21, did almost no homework in high school, and he recently landed a job most college graduates would covet — investment banking in Europe.

Was Trunk’s brother connected? Not really. But he could envision himself in a better position. Why? Because he felt entitled to be there - or to be there some day. Therefore, he put himself in situations where he was able to get a job which went with where he wanted to be in life. People who feel entitled are willing to make demands. People who do not feel entitled will pass up conferences, experiences, better jobs - because they do not feel like they deserve what is being offered. People take themselves out of the running because they have convinced themselves that the way they speak or how they dress or their level of education works against them - even if others think they are qualified.

That’s just one example.

We all feel entitlement in dozens of different ways every single day.

When discussing purchasing property with my boyfriend, I shoot down a lot of his recommendations. Why? Because I feel entitled to certain amenities where I live. I cannot imagine doing without a wonderful library system or a grocery store within walking distance or a nice view - even though millions of people live without these things each day. I feel entitled based on my newly acquired economic privilege and the experiences I had with these items in my life.

When walking down the street, I am occasionally moved express my love for my boyfriend. I may kiss him, I might hold his hand, I might tell him I love him. I can do all of these things, and the worst thing that may happen is someone will tell me to get a room. I can think about marriage, knowing that if we chose to wed all we need is a few hundred dollars and the address of the local courthouse. I feel entitled to these kind of feelings, entitled to express my love publicly because of my heterosexual privilege.

Last week, at three o’clock in the morning, I was pissed off. Why? The fire alarm had gone off yet again (twice in one week in the middle of the night) and I was forced to wake up, get dressed, and walk down sixteen flights of stairs to get to a safe place. I, like most of the other tenants in the building, were grumpy and tired and angry at having to go through yet another fire drill. We complained loudly about all the important things we were going to be late for in the morning. A young girl pushed her way to the front to talk to our concierge.

“Excuse me,” she said. “Is this a real fire? Because if it is, my mom is in a wheelchair and she can’t get out of the building.”

Now, I had never even heard the term “ableist” until I got to the blogosphere. And aside from a short stint volunteering at a special needs camp, I hadn’t given a thought to the lives of those who live with disabilities. But I’ll be damned if an understanding of privilege didn’t smack me in the face at 3 AM, that day. While the rest of us were annoyed, walking our way to the courtyard, that poor woman was probably terrified, wondering if someone would come to take her to safety.

My point with the three examples is that we all live with different levels of privilege. Some of these privileges are undeniable - after all, it wasn’t my hard work that gave me body with fully functioning limbs. And this body I take for granted could actually be injured to damaged at any time, robbing me of this privilege - and the feelings of entitlement that come with being able-bodied.

Still, some kinds of privilege seem to be easier to accept than others. While most of us would probably not be offended if a transsexual or gender queer person decided to bring up our cissexual privileges, some discussions of privilege tend to detonate.

So, I have three questions I’ve been turning over in my mind since planning this series:

1. How does entitlement play into the application of privilege?
2. Why do people want to deny or downplay the privileges that they have received?

And, most importantly -

3. Why do the phrases “white privilege” and “economic privilege” spark denials that are so strong, they can derail a conversation?**

—-

* This is different than being on welfare. You can be in need of welfare benefits (or any of the other accompanying social programs) without developing a welfare mentality. The mentality occurs when the system defines who you are and how you steer your life.

** I am specifically not discussing male privilege here. This does not mean I have forgotten or discounted its influence, it just means I am going to wrap that discussion into another post. We already have enough to talk about.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Life Links 11 « My Sky ~ Multiracial Family Life on 20 Feb 2008 at 3:11 pm

    […] Privilege Meme, currently at Racialicious (part 1, part 2, & part 3) I might have to do a whole post on this one . . […]

Comments

  1. DWS wrote:

    Excellent post!

    As for questions #2 and #3 - I suppose in a land where pulling oneself up by the bootstraps is lauded no one wants to publicly acknowledge they may have had a little help. It makes it more difficult to turn one’s nose up at someone else who has not attained the same status.

  2. Yvette wrote:

    “2. Why do people want to deny or downplay the privileges that they have received?”

    This question alone is complex and could inspire a post of its own!

    Part of the reason is that most of us experience “privilege” in a relative sense. So, though we may indeed be “higher” on the ladder than those “below,” we are very aware that there are many others “above” us.

    Another reason is what you illustrated so well with your fire alarm example: Most of us are unaware of the privileges that we do have–they are largely invisible because they are so “natural” to us. Relatedly, when our privileges are pointed out, it is easy to take this as criticism and respond accordingly.

  3. Black Canseco wrote:

    I’m not sure how class trumps race given that class is about privilege, access to wealth (specifically intergenerational), power and mass acceptance on your own terms and race is still the biggest barrier in achieving at least 3 out of the 4 mentioned?

    there’s a difference between rich and wealth–how many truly wealthy people of color do we have? that this year’s election is such a big deal reminds us that counting Carol Mosely Braun, Jesse Jackson in 84/88 and Shirley Chisholm we’ve now had exactly 4 people of color with any remote chance of becoming president. We’ve had exactly 2 black senators since reconstruction both have run for president in the last 6 years (braun/obama).The first black governor in america is still alive and under 75–that’s how recent that recent the political power moves have been made…

    call me when class and race are in the same deck, nevermind one trumping the other.

  4. jayjay wrote:

    people deny privilege because much of their self-worth is tied up in their accomplishments and possessions. to accept the idea that these things came to you as much by luck as by your own work and intelligence is a pretty severe blow to one’s ego.

    I think entitlement needs to be broken down a little further, though. there’s a feeling of entitlement to material things and a feeling of entitlement to access. and access itself can be understood both as simple opportunity to do something and having priority over other people with the same opportunity.

    if i were to make judgments, I would probably have to say that a sense of entitlement with respect to material things is foolish (what happens if you can no longer afford that standard of living?), a sense of entitlement to priority over your competitors is wrong, but a sense of entitlement to access is necessary if you are going to accomplish anything.

    just thoughts.

  5. Cynthia wrote:

    Black Canseco,

    Power isn’t only about political power, but corporate power too. Do foreign-run companies not count in this case?

  6. Anonymiss wrote:

    1. I think the priveleged (ppl whose money talks) are falsely entitled because many things are conducive to them. With regards to services and entertainment, they’re given VIP treatment. Some of them walk around with airs and some honor their arrogance with feelings of insecurity.

    2. Ppl downplay their privelege because it would then question their accomplishments and question the merit of their work.

    3. Race and class are still touchy subjects and, again, ppl don’t want their accomplishments and the merit of the work to be questioned.

    http://anonymissblog.blogspot.com/

  7. OW wrote:

    Folks might want to look at this piece in the Economist. I don’t agree with the conclusions but I do think it raises an interesting point about the relative EXPERIENCE of class privilege vs. an absolute accounting of wealth/income differences.

    http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10328935

  8. B wrote:

    Great series of posts. I agree with DWS. The entire mythology of this country is based on the idea that it is a meritocracy that represents a break from “old world” aristocracy. I think that entitlement was built up into the mythology as well–”manifest destiny,” anyone? I think these issues are part of the reason that the country has sooooo much trouble acknowledging the role that slavery–as an economic system–had on forging the nation, how unbelievably f-ed up that system was in terms of how people were treated (yep; there are still some undergrads out there who argue, with a straight face, that slave labor was a fair trade for food, clothing, and shelter), and the fact that the US was built on the genocide of the various indigenous tribes that were here. Emerson’s “Self Reliance” is easier for most people, school-aged or otherwise, to stomach.

  9. jd wrote:

    Yvette and Anonymiss - exactly. people want to think that they succeeded in a totally fair competition. pointing out the advatages they may have had over others takes away from their sense of accomplishment. (it also takes away from their ability to look down on other people)

    As I mentioned in the other posts on privilege, my mom married “up” into a middle-class family where all of her in-laws were college educated. She knows that she and her relatives are as smart and as hard-working as her in-laws, but she’s embarassed that her side of the family has all the criminal convictions and drug abuse (that we know of). She’s always made a point of telling us that we didn’t earn our brains, our talents or the opportunities that she and my dad worked to provide us.

  10. lunanoire wrote:

    This post touches a comprehensive list of intertwining issues. When my parents moved from a small, crawded duplex in a middle class part of town (a form of privilege) (walking/short bus ride to parks, libraries, grocery stores, malls, banks. post ofices, movie theaters, nightlife, health food stores, high rises, and frequent bus lines in several directions). They bought a house ( a form of privilege) in the ‘hood, where we hear guns around once a week, the buses run much less frequently, and the retail/errand/jobs are limited and stray dogs are more likely to roam the streets. I cried for a month, and finally stopped after running into a former classmate who was living out of his van.

  11. Black Canseco wrote:

    I didn’t mean to leave out economic power or access to corporate access. Though i wonder what you mean by “foreign”… I wouldn’t expect French Canadians to have power or position in China simply because they’re French Canadian.

    I think there’s a lot of bias when it comes to foreign-run companies. Look at the so-called “sovereign funds” (mutual funds that are built/run by governments such as Britain, France, Saudi Arabia, etc.

    American business media outlets are really worried about Sovereign funds from China and the middle east buying up huge shares of american companies. There’s this fear mongering that says the Saudi’s are terrorists waiting to happen and that China is communist–therefore evil–and the last thing you want is having american companies be answerable to “those people”.

    But if Britain or Ireland or Canada or Australia buys up huge stakes in american companies, it’s okay because hey they’re “the good guys”.

    As individuals, i don’t think i’m entitled to any special economic access in foreign countries (jobs, loans,etc.) simply because i’m an american. but i wouldn’t want to be punished for it anymore than i’d want to do that to someone else.

    just a few thoughts…

  12. Cynthia wrote:

    Black Conseco,

    Foreign ownership means owners who are not American. Companies where the many of the higher ups are expats, who may or may not be non-white. As for China, I think the evilness is more of a human rights thing than their communist government.

  13. cocolamala wrote:

    One important difference between class and race is that in the U.S, people change their class as they aquire (or lose) economic, intellectual, and social privilege. However, race is immutable.

    When racial minorities change classes, they do so despite (and sometimes because of) the lingering effects of institutionalized racism.

    Race doesn’t exactly trump class, but it is a factor that can impact your class privilege.

    For example: Look at discriminatory admissions practices at colleges and universities that limited the ability of minorities of our grandparent’s generation to choose college. How many of us are first or second generation college graduates as a result? How did segregation in public schools affect the readiness of our parent’s generation to enter elite colleges and universities?

    Economic and educational policies that disproportionally impacted minorities in the past have created class differences that can still be drawn along racial lines today.

    The privilege meme could have included a question about race to show that the two don’t necessarily operate independently.

  14. Cynthia wrote:

    Cocolamala,

    Your theory only works for people who have lived in the west for generations. There were WOMEN in my grandmother’s generation (on my mom’s side) who went to university, including her older sister. Grandma would have gone had war not broken out. Instead, she took a secretarial/bookkeeping course. My mom went to an elite girls’ Catholic high school in Hong Kong and my dad went to one of the top public schools (in the American/Canadian sense) there. Dad grew up in the projects and my mom’s family varied from lower middle class to borderline middle-middle class, depending on my grandfather’s job situation (i.e. my mom and her brother were never hungry and always had a Christmas present). There are plenty of non-whites in this part of the world who are immigrants or children of immigrants and have little sense of the experiences that multigeneration non-whites, especially African Americans have faced over the course of US history.

  15. coco wrote:

    Minorities do find success in the US, but minority groups are still disproprotionally affected by poverty, health, education and incarceration issues. Race can and does have an impact on class in the US.

  16. Will Barratt wrote:

    This is a great collection of thoughtful reactions, far different from the initial onslaught of hate mail that I got in January for the ‘privilege meme’ experience that I wrote with students and that Jeanne modified and posted on quakerclass.blogspot.com.

    One inherent problem in privilege and class is that these are loosely coupled systems. Not each item of privilege, whether on our list or not, corresponds precisely to some aspect of class. I know many people in the upper income brackets who have fewer than 50 books at home.

    I really appreciate the thought people have put into these three discussions and the wonderful writing by Latoya Peterson.

  17. Joanna Eng wrote:

    I agree that throwing immigration into the picture changes things, as do situations of rapid social mobility.

    Take the idea of entitlement in my family, for example. My dad and his 3 sisters were raised by new immigrants from a poor village, and grew up in a 2-room house, and my dad talks about how he had to eat quickly to make sure that he got enough food. But through getting a full scholarship to college, my dad is now a lawyer who makes a decent amount of money, and we grew up in an upper middle class suburb and went to summer camp and everything.

    My sense of entitlement, I would say, is different from people who have been in the upper middle class for many generations, because when I was growing up I was constantly reminded of what my dad achieved to get us here.

    Of course, I am now able to take things for granted that he would not have one generation earlier. And at the same time, my dad wants us to feel some entitlement, because that’s what he worked so hard to give to us.

    It’s a tough question, but I would say that my application of privilege has a healthy dose of awareness and appreciation, mixed in with entitlement.

  18. jd wrote:

    Cynthia,
    since cocolamala’s comment was EXPLICITLY about racial experiences in the U.S., not sure what the point of your response was.

    There is one reason for denying privilege that I can get behind - as an attempt to make people think about what the baseline in society ought to be. In other words, saying, it’s not that I’m privileged, but that society/the government has failed you. For example, I understand that having reliable health insurance makes a huge difference in people’s lives, but in a country with the resources that the U.S. has, it shouldn’t be considered a privilege.

  19. Cynthia wrote:

    jd,

    You could be a minority living in the US and be a third, fourth+ generation college grad because people in your family were educated in the old country. Cocolamala did not mention anything about being multigeneration American, only about the racial experience in the US, which I interpret as being anything from immigrant to multigeneration American.

  20. Allen wrote:

    Very good post. It made me think a lot.

  21. nola wrote:

    #3. As for this …I’m mixed Mexican/White. There was always an ongoing dialogue in my family about race and mixed-ness. I was taught to be aware of my half-white privilege and as a result I don’t feel threatened by the term “white privilege”. I think that’s what it comes down to, race is an abrasive subject matter. If you haven’t had the safety net of a family/community to bounce around these ideas they are going to rub you the wrong way.

  22. cristalena wrote:

    Why do people want to deny or downplay the privileges that they have received?

    I think its very American idea to be proud of ourselves and achievements as individuals. And we resist those characterizations that we are the product of a community. That we did it all on our own without the help of privilege, and without the help of resources and people around us . (like a great teacher or mentor, etc.)

    I understand, no one wants to be lumped as part of a group, it gets you into problematic areas when you start seeing one person as a token representative of their ‘group’ of people and representaive of a whole community.

    But, I like how the author talks about her community area and environment as being part of her privilege, in the eyes of her cousins.

    I think we are all going to fight and deny the fact we had any privilges as long as we see our success as ME centered and we value our independence rather than interdependence.

  23. Jennifer wrote:

    I believe the reason why people don’t talk about privilege and entitlement is because they don’t realize their privilege. I realized after reading your post that I have had an extremely privileged childhood and young adult life that has only changed recently with my mother’s sickness and father’s death. However, I am still applying to med school within a 1 year and 1/2. I realized a while ago when I speaking with a friend that my “struggles” aren’t anything compared to others. I mean I struggle financially to support myself in college(student loans galore), I’ve never been outside of the US, don’t own a passport, etc. However, I have been blessed beyond belief.

    I believe the reason why bringing up white privilege is so contestable is because some white people have experienced the same upbringing as you or worse. Therefore, they don’t feel privileged. Also, many equate privilege with money. Thus, they may feel since they don’t have a lot of money they are not privileged. However, in my opinion white privilege is SOCIAL CAPITAL. They may be poor, uneducated, etc. Nonetheless, they will still receive favorable treatment from society(such as the media will still cover a missing white women regardless of income, or the justice system is still likely to sentence a white person for less for the same crime a black person commits, etc). Whereas, myself being a black woman of middle class upbringing, I can/have been harassed by cops, discriminated against, etc. despite my class difference with those that are usually in the penal system. Even when I become an orthopedic surgeon, I can/will be discriminated against. So, that is white privilege to me. They don’t deal with the harassment that we do, even when we more up the class ladder.

  24. Orville wrote:

    I really like this series on class because we are so caught up with race. Class affects all of us yet some of us attempt to ignore that it still exists.
    I would have to say in some aspects I had privilege. I grew up in a two parent household. I guess this can be considered a privilege because I know relatives of mine that did not. I always had food on the table and I was never hungry as a child. When I was a young boy back in the 1980s we didn’t live in the best area. However, in the early 1990s in my early teens we moved up the class area outside of Toronto to the suburbs.

    Some people may say because I am not American and from Canada I have even more privilege. For a long time I thought the United States had good health care. Well I have learned now the USA does not have universal health care and I am surprised.

    I guess since I was born in Canada and I am Canadian some people say it is even better then the United States because we have access to Universal Health Care. In Canada it does not matter your race, class, or gender, you can get free government sponsored health care. The only catch is the wait times in the hospital or for surgery if you need it. The bottom line is though in Canada you don’t have to pay for the vast majority of your health care.

  25. Orville wrote:

    I also think there is a psychological aspect to the issue of class that needs to be focused on.
    I don’t think anyone “wants” to be “poor”, not have good health care, clean water, clean house, access to food. The issue with class also relates to the psychological side. My parents always say if you want something in life you have to work hard for it. You have to find a way. After reading this series maybe it is not so simple as personal determination. For instance, some people in the part of the world they are stuck in their class due to the fact their governments simply ignore the poor. I do believe in North America though even if you are poor you can achieve. You have to believe you can but I can imagine for some people this is hard too. I think it goes back to the parents. Even if the parents are poor if the parents teach their children they deserve more in life through hard work this can help them.

    I think some want to feel “superior” to other people due to class. I also believe rich people do have more connections due to their class status. Poor or middle class people do have to work harder to live the North American dream.

  26. Will Barratt wrote:

    Orville writes about the idea that if you work hard then you can achieve. Well, the worst part about that sentiment is that it is partly true. There are examples of people who have worked hard and achieved. I see them every day on campus and in my classes.

    The down side is that we do not see the vast majority who worked hard and did not achieve, and we do not see those who were never encouraged to work hard. There is systemic class based discrimination in the schools (See Van Galen 2000) as well as ethnic discrimination, and favoritism.

    The other problem of this idea is that it leads to blaming those who do not succeed because others worked hard and did succeed. Why is it that lower class students in economically disadvantaged schools, in general, do poorly academically? Is it them, or is it the teachers and administrators.

    As to your class as a psychological issue - yes. One way to look at class is as an identity, and another is as a cultural identification. Both of these are personal or psychological in nature and emphasize the personal nature of what is going on with class, gender and ethnicity.

  27. sam wrote:

    Privilege tends to be relative; as bad as you have it, there is a strong chance someone else has it MUCH worse off than you. However, education can be a huge component of “upward mobility”. I was born at the end of the genocidal Khmer Rouge Regime in Cambodia; my parents escaped by walking for a month through mine-filled jungles to reach the Thai border under constant threat of being caught and killed. My mom was 7 months pregnant with me. they didn’t get the warmest welcome at the border and were forcibly repatriated; they had to escape a 2nd time. my parents were educated before the war (they were in law school, and my mother was one of the only two women in the program), which meant several things: they had more advanced health knowledge than most others (who were from primarily rural areas) so my sister and I survived during high periods of infant mortality. once my parents finally got to the refugee camps, because of their English-speaking skills, they were able to take on leadership positions assisting aid workers; this eventually connected them with sponsors that expedited our immigration to the U.S. within a year or two, whereas others spent several years in refugee camps before being sponsored; some were never sponsored and after as much as a decade in refugee camps, were repatriated to Cambodia.
    We came to the U.S. with $100 for a family of 4 and a suitcase. My parents went to college as soon as they could and now my dad makes more than $100k a year (but he doesn’t share any of that with me or my sister and after 20 years of supporting my dad by working while he went to school, they divorced and he screwed my mom out of accessing his pension/retirement). my parents expected that my sister and i would be engineers or computer scientists–any job that would “guarantee” we make money. they advised against me choosing to get an english degree but still let me decide. growing up, they said i could go to any school i wanted and they would take care of it. turns out, they were just expecting that i get a scholarship (well, it’s kinda hard to keep your grades up when your parents are going through a divorce, but whatever). i only applied to one school and didn’t get in; i attribute a lot of that to not having any guidance from parents or teachers, feeling like i couldn’t afford to go to schools out of state, that i didn’t have a good enough story to tell in my personal statement, and general instability because of my parents divorce (it was awesome timing). 10 years later, i mostly feel successful, despite not having the opportunity to go to any school i wanted (i lucked out that my public university was at least in the top 3rd tier). i worked at a nonprofit and am now in grad school. but i don’t have a house, a car, or a job, which, to my parents, means that i’m a failure. to them, they worked so hard to bring me here and give me what i needed, even if it was the bare minimum, and i throw it away studying something frivolous. but i had the most amazing job experiences and really learned a lot, namely that getting a job is primarily about who you know. there’s even statistics out there that only 10 - 20% of jobs are posted; people are usually hired from within or through recommendations. so if you or your parents or other family members are in more advanced positions, they will have friends in more advanced positions that could potentially give you a job, or a recommendation for your grad school application, which will then get you a better/higher-paying job, which then opens up more doors.

    So my point is that education is really important, but so are the connections and guidance you have.

  28. marge twain wrote:

    Thanks so much for sharing your story with us, Latoya.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.