Mega Political Round Up – 1/30/08
by Racialicious special correspondent Latoya Peterson

Alisa Valdes Rodriguez – Cuban Americans Should Support Barack
Obama is the only candidate in the race, either Democrat or Republican, who has a Cuba policy that makes any sense. He is the only candidate who is not afraid to state the obvious, which is this: The harsh U.S. economic embargo against Cuba, in place since Feb. 7, 1962, has not worked. We need a new path.
Too Sense – One of Us, All Of Us
When you attack a candidate on the base of his gender, race, or religious faith, you’re no longer attacking the candidate. You’re attacking all people who share that background, or in Romney’s case, anyone who simply doesn’t share Huckabee’s faith period. People react harshly because they know that the invoking those stereotypes in the public eye as an argument against a political candidate has the potential to affect not just votes, but their personal lives.
TPM Election Central – NY Times Endorses Hillary Clinton
Salon News – When Principles Aren’t Enough
John Edwards has run a principled campaign. He talks about poverty even though poor people can afford to give him little money and turn out to vote at low rates, especially in primaries. His “Back Home, Back Roads Barnstorm” campaign this week took him by bus from one small, rural area of South Carolina to the next, even though small cities like Lancaster, Seneca and Greenwood are not nearly as vote-rich as Greenville, Columbia or Charleston. Whatever else might be said of him, if Edwards suffers a crushing, third-place defeat on Saturday, nobody can say he abandoned his core campaign themes or target audiences. One could argue that his rhetoric, his stance on the issues, has slowed Clinton and Obama’s rush to the center, has increased their focus on economic issues.
NY Times – In Search of Reagan
Despite their valiant and transparent efforts, the 2008 G.O.P. candidates have been unable to recreate the alchemy that transformed Ronald Reagan from a 1940s B-movie actor into an icon of the Republican Party. It is not just that Messrs. Huckabee, McCain, Romney, Thompson and Giuliani lack Mr. Reagan’s charm. None has applied himself as long and as assiduously to marshaling ideas and developing a political base as Mr. Reagan did, honing an ideology that both fed on and nourished the growing conservative movement of his time.
Too Sense – Race Card, Trump Card
If there’s a lesson here, it’s one most people should have learned by now: The Democratic Party does not care about black people. They take our votes for granted and that’s why they don’t operate in our interest, even when they happen to be in power. Here’s another sad truth: the “progressive movement” doesn’t care about us either. They care about reproductive rights and gay rights, but don’t expect the Democrats to fulfill certain promises about transitional employment and education any time soon. Those provide convenient talking points in front of black audiences but are of little interest to the young liberal activists who will someday be running the party. Racism? That’s not a problem. We’re in the age of Obama, remember?
Washington Post – Team Obama is Courting Everyone but the Press
In an age of all-out political warfare, the Obama campaign is a bit of an odd duck: It is not obsessed with winning each news cycle. The Illinois senator remains a remote figure to those covering him, and his team, while competent and professional, makes only spotty attempts to drive its preferred story lines in the press.
“There is no charm offensive from the candidate toward the press corps,” says Newsweek correspondent Richard Wolffe. “The contact is limited. . . . They see the national media more as a logistical problem than a channel for getting stuff out.”
NY Times – Kennedy Chooses Obama, Spurning Plea by Clintons
Both the Clintons and their allies had pressed Mr. Kennedy for weeks to remain neutral in the Democratic race, but Mr. Kennedy had become increasingly disenchanted with the tone of the Clinton campaign, aides said. He and former President Bill Clinton had a heated telephone exchange earlier this month over what Mr. Kennedy considered misleading statements by Mr. Clinton about Mr. Obama, as well as his injection of race into the campaign.
Melissa Harris Lacewell – KLS Betrayal
If I had to choose between KLS and Caroline Kennedy, I suppose Obama got the more relevant and powerful endorsement, but it will make watching the show a little less sweet for me. I will not even buy her new Barbie.
Pandagon – The Fantasy of a “Post-Racial” Election
The bottom-feeding “Low Tidings” column was written by the Independent’s editor, Rick Murphy. This is what passes off as satire:
“The truth is, I don’t know many black people, but my advisers have drafted a strategy to reel in the black vote:
1) Call everyone ‘Brother.’ Blacks, I am told, do this even if most of their real brothers are in jail.
2) Talk Jive. Brothers want to hear jive. During my speech I told the crowd, ‘We be, you know, sick of whitey supressin’ and congestin’ so, you know, we won’t denigrate or sophisticate but emulate and populate, you know, the system is, like, broken, y’all!’”And, in reference to Hillary Clinton:
“Ultimately, if she gets too close, one of my New york advisors has advised me to ‘Bitch slap that ho.’ White women, I am told, like that.”A weak apology was issued, citing a “lapse of judgment.” Yes, I’m sure it was – after all we’re in “post-racial” mode.
The Humanity Critic – Bill and Hillary, Thanks for the Wake-Up Call
I can admit that the hype surrounding Barack after his Iowa win was a bit ridiculous – but ever since New Hampshire, you would be hard pressed to find one media outlet that doesn’t either obsess over race or shamelessly promote Hillary Clinton “talking points”. When the Clinton camp attacks its characterized as “good politics” and them being “tough”, but when Obama counters, he’s “whining”, “frustrated”, or how that hack Chris Matthews describes it – Bill Clinton is “inside Obama’s head”. MSNBC’s Craig Crawford would have us believe that Bill Clinton telling a South Carolina crowd that blacks will vote for Obama isn’t injecting race, but Obama somehow having Oprah simply stump for him is playing the race card – I used to think that a black man couldn’t become president because America wasn’t ready, now I believe it won’t happen because it seems that 95% of all the political writers out there got their journalism degrees from the bottom of a fucking cereal box.
Quick Richard Cohen: Obama is now too black of a candidate which is costing him the white vote.
Quick Eugene Robinson: Lost the white vote? Hillary scored 28% to Barack’s 27% of white men. HRC’s advantage comes from women, but they need to stop campaigning on identity politics.
Afrobella – Almost Doesn’t Count
Florida was stripped of all of its delegates by the DNC because the state wanted to move its primary forward from February, right? So I’m confused — does this victory count for the Clintons, or not? Was this just the symbolic election we were led to think it would be? Is this just a way to steal the big Kennedy-endorsement thunder from the Obama campaign? Or does it really mean that the Obama candidacy isn’t as secure as we might want to believe?
Finally: Hillary takes Florida, McCain beats Romney, and John Edwards is ending his bid.

Carmen Van Kerckhove is co-founder and president of
Colin wrote:
Obama will lose on Super Tuesday in terms of delegate count, and the margin, without Edwards, will be insurmountable. I like him, but if you’re either a Democrat or just an anti-Republican/anti-neocon, you probably should get used to cheering for Hillary already, cause she basically has it in the bag. Open Left has been doing great reporting and analysis of the current delegate estimates and it’s difficult to see Obama getting what now looks like a MUST-WIN for Super Tuesday, instead of hopefully joining with Edwards to get more anti-Hillary delegates, sadly.
Posted 30 Jan 2008 at 5:49 pm ¶
G.D. wrote:
Is Rodriguez racial call-to-arms above board? How is this different from the Steinem thing?
Posted 30 Jan 2008 at 9:22 pm ¶
donna darko wrote:
No, she’s just talking about Obama’s Cuba policy.
Posted 31 Jan 2008 at 2:01 am ¶
BreakMeAGimmee wrote:
Why did you miss the biggest one on the Republican side– McCain’s victory in FL thanks to the Jewban factor, his growing popularity among Hispanics (thanks to immigration, etc)? Or is this just too partisan? Jersualem Post and others were all over this:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1201523788521&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
I don’t care who wins, but focusing on one side with a narrow scope on who says what how misses the bigger developments.
Posted 31 Jan 2008 at 6:38 am ¶
Cooch wrote:
Again, last night, Chris Matthews was out of line and sided in a most bias way. When talking about Romny’s position on the Iraq war, he kept comparing the governer’s position to that of the democrats… but he only mentioned Hillary’s name each time. Hillary probably has the least ‘waving of the white flag’ troop withdrawl plan of the two remaining democrats; the other being Sen. O. CM again was sided and biased in his irresponsible comments. If you review last night’s plethera of subjective verbage used by CM, I think you would agree to put tape over his mouth…. and reprimand him once again. He is not a journalist in the true sense – all he wants is a good laugh, be able to personally sway the election, and beef up the ratings of his show.
What about Sen. O’s comments about his ‘cousins’ in Kansas? What about his affiliation with Rezko? If he is the unifier of the nation, then why is he getting most of the black vote and almost none of the Latino or white women votes (esp. those over 40) Let Mr. CM be fair in his degrading of candidates. Let him rant and rave in a deep cave somewhere where he only can hear his obnoxious voice echoing off the walls. I wasn’t originally for Hillary… but Mr. C’s unrelenting biased comments are turning me to her side.
Posted 31 Jan 2008 at 6:54 am ¶
G.D. wrote:
Donna,
I wonder if that makes it okay.
Posted 31 Jan 2008 at 11:48 am ¶
Latoya Peterson wrote:
GD –
I am not following you here. Please clarify. Alisa Valdez Rodriguez is explaining why people in her ethnic group – Cuban-Americans – should vote for Barack Obama. She makes her argument based on his proposed policy.
The Steinem piece, as Jenn summarized, relied heavily on identity politics as the reason to choose.
While Valdez is appealing to a specific ethnic group, she points to policy as a reason for her endorsement.
Posted 31 Jan 2008 at 12:12 pm ¶
Colin wrote:
G.D.,
Valdez is trying to say, “This policy is good for us, guys we need to get on board”, from what I can see, not like Gloria Steinem’s “She looks like me, so I should be a shill for her”.
One is literally about the issues and the other is literally about identity politics.
Cooch,
I think Hillary was mentioned because she’s the clear and away frontrunner. Also, I’ve gotta ask, who would you have supported if Chris Matthews didn’t FORCE you to support Hillary Clinton?
Posted 31 Jan 2008 at 3:38 pm ¶
G.D. wrote:
Latoya & Colin,
I stand corrected. Valdez’s argument is more substantive than Steinem’s argument or Melissa Harris-Lacewell’s Slate piece, certainly.
My ethnic political orthodoxy antennae went up prematurely.
Posted 31 Jan 2008 at 11:26 pm ¶