Political Round Up - Mixed Bag

by Racialicious Special Correspondent Latoya Peterson

Ad Age - Obama’s Hispanic Supporters Attack Hillary

“Barack Obama’s Hispanic supporters in Nevada have attacked Hillary Clinton, claiming her supporters are trying to deny them their rights. ”

Clutch - Films We Love: “Street Fight”

Fought in Newark’s neighborhoods and housing projects, the battle pits Booker against an old style political machine that uses any means necessary to crush its opponents: city workers who do not support the mayor are demoted; “disloyal” businesses are targeted by code enforcement; a campaigner is detained and accused of terrorism; and disks of voter data are burglarized in the night. Even the filmmaker is dragged into the slugfest, and by election day, the climate becomes so heated that the Federal government is forced to send in observers to watch for cheating and violence. The battle sheds light on important American questions about democracy, power and — in a surprising twist — race.

The Hill - Rove previews strategies against Clinton, Obama

Time and again, however, Rove returned to the trump card he used in his successfully executed 2002 and 2004 elections, saying that neither Obama nor Clinton is prepared to protect the country from terrorists.

Washington Post - BET Founder Tells Obama He’s Sorry

“Sometimes in campaigns you get carried away in your zeal to support your candidate. And you say things that are inappropriate and not proper for a campaign that should be based on the issues,” said Johnson, a Clinton supporter, in a phone interview on CNN’s “The Situation Room.” “And that is why I issued this personal apology to Senator Obama. I know Senator Obama. I have a great deal of respect for him. And I’m glad that his campaign has responded and accepted the apology.”


Salon.com - Why Campaign Coverage Sucks

“Voters are bombarded with information about which contender has ‘what it takes’ to be the best candidate. Who can deliver the most stirring rhetoric? Who can build the most attractive facade? Who can mount the wiliest counterattack? Whose life makes for the neatest story? Our political and media culture reflects and drives an obsession with who is going to win, rather than who should win.”

Talking Points Memo - The Problem with Bill

In the week or so leading up to the Nevada caucus I feel like I heard more from and about Bill Clinton than I did about Hillary Clinton. Is that the media’s doing rather than the campaign’s? Maybe. But I don’t find the argument convincing and I’m not sure it would matter if it were true. What seems difficult to deny is that his rising profile is threatening her position as the dominant force in her own campaign.

TPM Cafe - Clinton, Obama, MLK: Leadership for Change

Clinton’s idea of leadership is very different. Her effort to reform health care shortly after her husband took office was notable in that no one mobilized the public. Her team took polls, conducted focus groups, and engaged interest groups. But they never mobilized the public. And although an outsider at the time, she tried to play the insider game. But in the insider’s game, only the insider’s reality counts. So she lost – and so did the millions of us who never had an opportunity to help make the health care “changes” we needed and wanted and deserved.

Now Clinton wants us to hear what she will do “for” us, what “she” will deliver – much as a lawyer, drawing strength not from her client but from her expertise, argues a case. Obama, on the other hand, urges people to join with him in acting for themselves and each other. A former community organizer, he learned that without mobilizing the strength of people who want change, it won’t happen. It’s not only that changing ourselves and changing the world go together.

Comments

  1. Paul wrote:

    Lest people forget, HRC’s healthcare plan came about much in the same way as Dick Cheney’s energy policy. Both held closed-door meetings replete with lobbyists and corporate types and refused to make thier minutes public. HRC is more like Cheney/Bush or Nixon than JFK or Carter. Remember, she absconded with FBI files on people who she felt threatened the Clinton Machine. Plus, she and Bill covered for Sandy Berger when he stole and destroyed docements relating to pre-9/11 intelligence.

    Obama or Edwards may not be perfect, but they’re a helluva lot better than the alternative of Clintons Mark II.

  2. gatamala wrote:

    Street Fight is awesome!

  3. anna wrote:

    In the past two weeks, one major Republican candidate, Huckabee, shrouded himself in the Confederate flag. Another, Romney, campaigned in a Black neighborhood, on MLK day no less, by singing “Who Let the Dogs Out” at young children.

    Every Republican candidate uses states’ rights rhetoric straight from Wallace and Thurmond when campaigning in the South. The only immigration proposal that party supports is expelling 12+ million people without due process, who will be selected based on racial appearance or presumed religious background. (For some reason the new Know Nothings aren’t concerned about illegal immigration by Russian and Eastern European fundamentalist Christians.)

    The media exaggerates and stokes racial controversy amongst Democrats while the Republicans are getting a free pass. Too many Progressive commentators(and commenters on blogs) are falling into this trap when they parse sentence construction and imply shades of meaning into every word by the decent(though not perfect), non-racist candidates on the Democratic side. Please keep everything in perspective.

  4. Colin wrote:

    Anna,

    I feel the correct reply to your note about progressive commentators being too analytical is that we should push the corporate press to be more even-handed in their coverage. I believe that people like Chris Matthews can be shown to be misogynistic fools if we work together to do so, and likewise we can show Tim Russert and Wolf Blitzer to be dull-witted jackasses, if we really want to.

    But…I do not believe it would be progressive of us to stop “parsing” words if they contain a clearly prejudicial meaning to them. I believe fighting such beliefs and prejudices should be a core issue for progressives in fact.

  5. Paul wrote:

    Anna,
    Everyone knows the Republicans indulge in racial politics. Since Nixon’s Southern Strategy, it’s been their bread and butter. The DLC and the Clintons have done this as well, yet many progressives let them slide for years. People need to point out Bill and Hillary’s chicanery and dirty tricks.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.