Ideas on Politics and Race – Blogosphere Round Up

by Racialicious Special Correspondent Latoya Peterson

Bouncing around the blogosphere, I have noticed some interesting thoughts on politics and race from various sources.

The Musings of a Diva blog is written by an African-American expat living in Japan. She normally blogs about differences between Japanese and American culture (as well as other bits from her life) but she recently ranted a little bit about the US Presidential campaigns:

My current rant surrounds the Clinton/Obama hoopla and the belief that somehow Black people are nothing more than a group who needs help. In every media outlet I read its the same thing-who has done more for Black people? I am black and I don’t need anyone to do anything for me. I can do things for myself. If people want my political support they should clearly outline their programs, policies, and priorities and I can make my own decisions. I can’t tolerate condescension or pity in any form- and too often that is all that is extended towards anyone that is black regardless of any other attribute that defines them. I don’t dislike being black or feel that somehow destiny gave me a raw deal by being black and female. If other people are racist or sexist that is their flaw, but there is nothing wrong with me. As a result, when people approach me and expect to gain my respect they had better address me as a thinking individual.

On the Tapped Blog, writer Kate Sheppard discusses defining change*:

So perhaps it’s a question of what Clinton really means by “began to be realized.” I would say that the dream of equity began to be realized when people like Johnson were forced to change their position on it. It began to be realized when Americans, both black and white, united in saying that segregation was immoral and unsustainable. Johnson signing it into law was an imperative part of progress, but it was by no means the first, or the last.

But I don’t think Clinton’s statements qualify as racist. If anything, they more clearly highlight how she thinks about “change,” a word that everyone keeps dropping this primary season. In Clinton’s mind, change is something that comes from Washington, not from the desires of the American people. And that’s been one of the chief criticisms her opponents have offered in the primary – that she’s too invested in the Beltway to yield the real change citizens are longing for. If anything her statements are more indicative of some truth to those criticisms than they are evidence of racist intent.

Finally, this morning, Shark-Fu breaks down a big part of being a patriot – being politically active:

How can we increase our political presence?

That we, the under or not at all represented, need to be politically present and why we need to be is very clear.

No one can speak to our issues the way that we can.

So we must be on top of all the issues, allergic to spin and mindful of the responsibility of our vote.

We must participate in political life so religiously that no one could legitimately speculate over what matters to us or how to achieve our vote.

We must be politically present so that those who run for office know who they represent and respect the power of our vote, needs and opinion.

We must have the courage to run for local, state and national office.

We can run…we can win…and we must add our voice to the chorus.

Thoughts?

* Carmen reminded me that this is one of the key points of Obama’s campaign, just restated.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Comments

  1. Paul wrote:

    Localism is the best way to gain access to the system and the easiest way to make real changes to it. Unless you live in a major city, like NYC or Philly, school board elections are pretty easy to get involved in and rarely draw a large number of voters. Thus, a small band of activists can force their way onto the board and make real changes where they matter most.

    City and town councils are a bit tougher because they often draw career politicos. Eeven state senate and legisaltures are feasible as they require mostly legwork and retail politics.

  2. bdsista wrote:

    In response to Musings of Diva’s rant. I am glad that she is able to live in Japan and not need any help from anybody to the extent that even if a candidate addresses helping Blacks (or other people) it irritates her. However, not everyone is as fortunate, I work in a public school where 1/3, 1/2 of the students are on free or reduced lunch. For them, school is where they get two of their meals for the day. I have two coworkers, (1 Blk, 1 Wht) who are fighting not to lose their homes. Both are single females parents. The reality is there are a LOT of Black (and brown and red, and yellow and white and whatever other shade) people who need help, need it bad and need it now! A woman left a toddler out on an overpass bridge in the snow yesterday to die. It was rescued, but what makes a mother leave her child to die in the snow?! I don’t think addressing the needs of people means that they are unthinking individuals, but having been in Japan, its real different thinking about Black folk from over there and watching people struggle over here. Not to be rude, but I’m glad you’re ok, but its not all about you Happy Bunny.