Morrissey under fire for anti-immigration remarks

by guest contributor Yolanda Carrington, originally published at The Primary Contradiction

The United States isn’t the only society plagued with xenophobia, as a recent controversy over a legendary singer’s remarks shows. And we sure aren’t the only society where white folks’ understanding of systemic racism is jawdroppingly low, nor is this great land the only society where most white folks will do anything to avoid discussing race. The latest racism scandal in the entertainment world involves not a tired shock-jock or stand-up comic, but the ethereal voice behind such classics as The Queen is Dead and Meat is Murder.

Former Smiths frontman Morrissey—a musical icon for many folks of my generation—has been under fire for the past couple of weeks over comments he made about immigration in a piece published by New Musical Express (more popularly known these days as simply NME). When asked by journalist Tom Jonze if he would consider moving back to the UK after over a decade of living abroad (alternating between Los Angeles and Rome), Morrissey reportedly said:

Britain’s a terribly negative place. And it hammers people down and it pulls you back and it prevents you. Also, with the issue of immigration, it’s very difficult because although I don’t have anything against people from other countries, the higher the influx into England the more the British identity disappears [my emphasis].

And:

If you walk through Knightsbridge [London neighborhood] on any bland day of the week you won’t hear an English accent. You’ll hear every accent under the sun apart from the British accent.

Morrissey claims that NME ambushed him with a “stitch-up” job on him in order to sell papers, and he and his lawyers are currently pursuing legal action against the NME and its editor Conor McNicholas. Interviewer Jonze maintains that every quote attributed to Morrissey is accurate, and points out the fact that he never once asked Morrissey about immigration, yet the singer felt compelled to unleash his views anyway. Many people were quick to side with Morrissey against the NME, since the paper has a not-so-upstanding reputation with music fans in the UK. Other supporters defend Morrissey’s right to free speech, while others express agreement with his views on immigration, insisting that it all has nothing to do with racism but just the natural response to a “massive” wave of immigration that is destroying Britain’s national identity and way of life. Now where have we heard that argument before?

While it may be tempting to believe that this scandal surrounding the singer is merely a hatchet job by a sleazy tabloid-style rag, keep in mind that Morrissey has a long history of making insensitive public gestures and comments. He was once quoted as saying “All reggae is vile” in an early interview, which many people interpreted as an slap in the face to Black Britons and Afro-Carribean culture. Perhaps the most disturbing example of Morrissey’s racism was his 1992 performance at the Madness Madstock! reunion concert, as described by Wikipedia:

A trigger for much of the criticism was Morrissey’s performance at the first Madness Madstock! reunion concert at Finsbury Park, London, in 1992, in which he appeared on stage draped in the Union Flag, a symbol often associated with nationalism and hence with far right groups in Britain. As a backdrop for this performance, he chose a photograph of two female skinheads. The NME responded to this performance with a lengthy examination of Morrissey’s attitudes to race, claiming that the singer had “left himself in a position where accusations that he’s toying with far-right/fascist imagery, and even of racism itself, can no longer just be laughed off with a knowing quip.”

Morrissey’s pattern is predictable: When challenged about his wink-wink nudge-nudge comments and actions, Morrissey protests that he isn’t racist and that he is being set up by his accusers. When he’s playing around with the lives of people of color, it’s no big deal; it’s only when he feels he’s under attack and needs to defend himself does he gets serious about racism. It’s the same old pattern that we stateside people of color have seen time and again, this time on the other side of the Atlantic.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. bastard.logic on 12 Dec 2007 at 10:13 pm

    Bigmouth Strikes Again…

    by matttbastard

    Hey Moz–go stuff yer gob with the “I was misquoted” bollocks, mate. Listen to Billy re: the first rule of holes, k? You were caught on tape soul-kissing the spirit of Enoch Powell; drop the writs and embrace your lat…

Comments

  1. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    It is ironic that an Irishman like Morrissey would be racist against British immigrants of color - not that suprising, but ironic nonetheless.

    As far as that comment about hearing “…every accent under the sun apart from the British accent.” in Knightsbridge - well, I hate to have to educate Morrissey in London history, but London, and in particular the East End, has been multiracial for the past couple hundred years.

    Up until the 50’s, there were a mix of Irish, Italians, Jews, other Europeans, as well as small but significant numbers of Africans, Afro Carribbeans, South Asians and East Asians from all over the British Empire.

    In more modern times, the immigrant population has become more heavily Black and Asian, but there are still sizable numbers of White immigrants from Europe as well.

    In a lot of ways, when it comes to Londoners, to be British is to be an immigrant!!!

    The “Cockney” (working class East End of London) accent that folks who watch BBC America know so well is basically the manner of speech of working class White immigrants in Britain - and I would hope Morrissey knows that!!!

    Well, like Enoch Powell said back in the day ” there ain’t no black in the Union Jack” - and, sadly, there are still White British people who feel the same way.

  2. Tom wrote:

    So it’s ok for greedy, grasping Imperial British colonists to invade other countries to bring a touch of “civilization” to the primitives of the world, but not ok for these immigrant descendants to bring their culture into the UK? Well hell, you reap what you sow. The Brits could do with a little more culture than their own. I say turnabout is fair play.

  3. anna wrote:

    Its also ironic given that one of Morrissey’s main fan bases in the US are Mexican-Americans and immigrants from Mexico. He and The Smiths are not very popular in Mexico itself though.

  4. Ms. Four wrote:

    Ugh. It’s always a bummer to hear about the true feelings of people you thought you liked.

    As far as this quote goes:
    “If you walk through Knightsbridge [London neighborhood] on any bland day of the week you won’t hear an English accent. You’ll hear every accent under the sun apart from the British accent.”

    What’s funny to me about this is that I said something almost exactly along these lines just earlier today to a friend, in talking about a trip to London last week, but I presented it as a positive thing, as in, London is great, so diverse and international!

  5. jd wrote:

    all I have to say is:

    1. stop using “british” and “english” interchangably, jack-ass. if you’re not sure what the difference is, go to any pub in Scotland or Wales and try it.

    2. for someone who’s been living in other people’s countries to criticize other people for doing what he’s doing takes a lot of nerve. I guess it’s not immigration when rich, white artists do it - then it’s just jet-setting

    3. and the British Empire, but Tom already covered that

  6. gatamala wrote:

    *sigh* good points

  7. Morgan wrote:

    this ruined my day, possibly my week.

  8. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    JD -

    I know very well what the difference between British and English is.

    British is anybody who lives in or came from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (although I’m sure a lot of folks in Ulster - particularly Nationalist and/or Catholic Irish - would have beef with being called “British”)

    English is anybody who lives in or is from England (as opposed to Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland).

    Some National Front and skinhead racialist types might take the position that only White people who are ethnically English can call themselves English - I don’t agree, I feel that anybody from England is English.

    And, English, Scottish and Welsh people (and, in the minds of Loyalist and/or Protestant folks from Ulster, Northern Irish people) are all British.

    That’s why I said British instead of English in my post.

  9. Yolanda Carrington wrote:

    Gregory—I think JD was referring to Morrissey himself—Moz uses the terms “English” and “British” interchangably in the quotes I excerpted above.

  10. Thea wrote:

    I saw the headline of this post and almost didn’t want to read it because I love the Smiths…sob.

    Hm, it’s interesting that he’s concerned about the effect of immigration on the British identity - do you think he ever wonders why English is spoken all over places like, say, India and Southeast Asia and North America and Australia? Does it ever cross his mind that a large part of the British identity was (is?) eradicating other peoples’ cultures? For crying out loud.

  11. Yolanda Carrington wrote:

    Gregory—I think JD was referring to Morrissey himself—Moz uses the terms “English” and “British” interchangably in the quotes I excerpted above, a tendency many nativist English folk have. JD, correct me if I’m wrong.

    This scandal didn’t get much coverage in the US media, which is why I felt compelled to blog about it. Many US folk are huge fans of the Smiths and Morrissey, including people of color. For someone as talented as Moz, the fact that he could have such a terrible history of racism and immigrant-bashing really disappointed me.

    Great feedback, everyone. Thanks!

  12. Down in the Tube Sta wrote:

    Hmm… wondering if “National Front Disco” wasn’t enough of a clue?

    I recall a Robert Christgau bit on him, where he once said (paraphrasing) that because he hides behind the bitchy jokes his followers consider beneath him, they’re guaranteed to amuse and excite the curiosity-seeker. That any of them could be conceived as serious hits from an already-faded star explains Anglophila. Substitute music for his bizarre statements over the years, I think he’s onto something.

    The man has suffered through a permanent self-pitying identity crisis to an insufferably monotonous degree that comes off in public as reflective and “arty”. Harmless with a whiny person, dangerous when enough folks agree.

    At least the Cure did the same mopey shtick strictly for commerce.The Smiths’ passive aggressiveness just makes me that much more grateful for embracing the Gang of Four, Wire, Echo & the Bunnymen, 999, Jam, Undertones, Buzzcocks, et al. crowd back in the day.

  13. E.Castle wrote:

    Way to not even scratch the surface. “Immigration” and “race” are not interchangeable terms. I say this as a left-leaning, non-white offspring of immigrants that people seriously need to practice some discernment instead of knee-jerk, shrill, reactionary immediate denouncements. Where does Morrissey mention race? Am I racist if I observe that most of the immigrants I know are white Lithuanians?

    How ironic that the NME is playing the race card when they literally adopted a policy not to put artists of color on their covers because their magazine didn’t sell as well as when they featured white artists on the covers. Did you bother to check that out?

    I checked out The Primary Contradiction where this was posted and it was nice to see the inclusion of women of color. When I worked for NOW in DC in the late 90s it was an old white ladies’ club, and I felt very much the outsider screaming for the mainstream to take notice of women of color issues. Having said that, I’m disheartened to see that so much of what I dislike about the far right is echoed in the media coverage of this story by the far left, specifically zero tolerance of any degree of non-adherence, i.e. you’re either with us or you’re against us. Extreme political correctness, like far-right intolerance, effectively shuts the door on any discussion or progress towards any solution.

    By the way, “National Front Disco” is about a misguided boy and is written from the POV of family and friends who think he’s stupid. Again, challenge yourself and dare to scratch the surface.

  14. Yolanda Carrington wrote:

    E. Castle, Primary Contradiction is a woman of color-owned site, and I am that owner. Women of color perspectives are centered at TPC, not “included” after the fact. The same is true here at Racialicious, which is also WOC-owned and moderated.

    Secondly, nobody here is playing a “race card.” Morrissey made xenophobic remarks in the NME interview, without being asked one question about immigration by the journalist conducting the interview. That fact cannot be denied— it happened. As for not mentioning race, anyone who’s ever lived in the US or UK can read the racist subtext of Moz’s remarks. Anti-immigrant rhetoric is everyday discourse in these two countries—I can regurgitate the weak arguments of nativists in my sleep.

    Furthermore, neither myself nor the good folks here at Racialicious are new at this game. We’ve all been engaged in antiracist activism and pop culture analysis for years. Many of us here are Smiths/Morrissey fans and we’ve loved this man’s work as long as we’ve been alive. If you had told me Moz’s history of racism four days ago, I would have called you a liar. But yet, it’s there. And we have a duty to challenge racism when we see it, which is exactly what immigrant-bashing is. Challenging racism in public statements is neither reactionary nor “shrill,” and it damn sure doesn’t shut down progress towards solution, an ironic charge coming from someone who considers antiracist analysis “political correctness.”

    By the way, everyone is entitled to their own analysis of Moz’s songs, including “National Front Disco.” We can disagree about things like that.

  15. Hotful o' Mellow wrote:

    There’s three separate things going on here:

    (1) Anyone who doesn’t recognize Morrissey as a professional ranconteur (just ask Mr. Marr for evidence) and his extensive record of provocative (putting it mildly) eye-rolling statements on every issue under the sun is missing the point: his main point is to serve his main interest– keeping him in the news and relevant. (ask his former band, what were they called again, I’m sure he might remember them).

    (2) He’s not being evasive or retreating or apologetic– he’s being annoyingly, consistently coy (cf Michael Stipe, especially on issues of sexuality). He supports “good” causes but is also snotty, and known to pick fights, and is a figure in love with the sound of his own verbs, known to make grand statements along with serious missteps.

    (3) More serious: Commentary and actions tied to nationality perceived as attacks on ethnic and racial groups. How can he be progressive (vegetarian, anti-torture, etc.) on some things and a nativist domestic protectionist (i.e. “right wing”, “conservative”) on others? How can he like “black” music and icons while slamming Ethiopia and immigrants? I won’t defend what he said (don’t know for sure now what it is), but note that what he said and what he’s attacked for years opens up that ongoing debate of identity in times of economic scarcity and social uncertainty. Things become more “black” and “white” according to others they more “grey” you are in your bearing.

    Tossing in a bonus 4th: Distrusting Wikipedia as much as MSM, you get better music news from the boards– hell even “Q”– than NME. Note that only part of the story relayed here was that, yes, while Jonze disagreed with our Mr. M (as many people do), Jonze ALSO reportedly asked to have his own name removed from the interview– all but acknowledging the hatchet job done in the piece as well.

    Disagreements about whatever a truly disagreeable figure said are fair game, but getting the story straight (if ever possible) from a better source is important too…

  16. Orville wrote:

    I am not going to deny I am a Morrissey fan. Morrissey has always felt he was an outsider for many reasons. One Morrissey is of Irish heritage even though he was born in Manchester England. Second, Morrissey is not straight. Morrissey has a history of making controversial statements. I think Morrissey sometimes doesn’t “think” before he says things. And sometimes I don’t agree with Morrissey on the things he says.

    Remember the NME is a British magazine that another poster pointed out hardly ever has artists of colour on their cover. I don’t think NME really cares about people of colour they just care about controversy and selling more copies of their magazine and free publicity. Because of the negativity Morrissey has received over the years with the British media he actually has become very reticent. In fact, for many years Morrissey would have concerts sell out yet he would NOT conduct any interviews. And that’s how popular Morrissey is. Morrissey has fans of all races from Asia, North America, and Europe, to Australia, New Zealand.

    However, I honestly don’t believe Morrissey is this bigot that the NME is trying to make him to be. Anyone that knows Morrissey’s music and history knows he has had problems with the British media trying to say he’s a racist.
    Yet Morrissey has written many anti racism songs.
    One song “Asian Rut” on the album “Kill Uncle” talks about two white men murdering a young Asian man and Morrissey says that’s racism and its wrong.

    Just remember that Morrissey has had a long standing feud with the New Music Express in England. For years NME has tried to say Morrissey is a racist. If Morrissey is such a racist why would he perform at anti racism concerts? Has anyone listened to his CD “You Are The Quarry?” The first song “America Is Not The World” is a very anti racism song.

  17. sk wrote:

    JD-good point, he doesn’t seem to understand that he is an immigrant as far as people in LA and Rome are concerned.

  18. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    Yolanda,

    On a second reading, I believe that you are right about that - Morrissey DID use “English” and “British” as synonyms - and, as any Welsh, Northern Irish or Scottish person can tell you, they do NOT mean the same thing!

    I wasn’t aware that British racists try to make being “British” the same thing as being ethnically “English” - but that kinda makes sense, considering how much effort that the British state put into eradicating Celtic culture in Ireland, Scotland and Wales for most of the last 800 or so years.

  19. Winn wrote:

    Oh boy. As a an obsessive Morrissey fan since the early 80’s, I’ve struggled to reconcile some of his comments on race and ethnicity with the enormous impact he’s had on my life as an artist. Sheesh, I became a vegetarian because of “Meat is Murder”! Morrissey has experienced enormous scrutiny of his views, thanks not only to Madstock and “National Front Disco” (I agree with E. Castle’s assessment of that song, by the way), but also songs like “Bengali in Platforms” and even “Asian Rut”, another frequently misinterpreted song. Although I don’t doubt the comments were quoted accurately, there is a well-established love-hate relationship between Morrissey and NME, so I admit I am suspicious of their motives whenever it comes to him. I think Morrissey’s racial and ethnic views are contradictory and complex, and his views about England even more so. Any Smiths fan knows about his oft-written about fascination and romanticization of an “ideal” England, and I think sometimes that comes out in misguided and insensitive comments. I like to think Morrissey is a combination of the deliberately provocative and the willfully naive, but perhaps I am only making excuses for an artist I adore. Sigh…The saga continues…

  20. Colin wrote:

    As a controversial issue, immigration is often a brush dipped deep into the great dirty ocean of race, E.Castle.

    As an American, I only know of my own country (jk), but even within my own nation, I can think of some examples of times when immigration only means a certain racial or ethnic group, like current anti-Hispanic posturing throughout American politics today because of ‘illegal immigration’, or similar treatment to Asian immigrants on the West Coast or against Irish immigrants on the East.

    Reading the long history (don’t forget rejecting Jewish immigrants during the Holocaust because it would hurt FDR’s re-election bid) of US anti-immigrant fervor seemingly pitched at those people who don’t look like “Americans” or talk like “Americans” has kind of taught me to be wary of someone across the pond being this offended by immigrants who would dilute “British identity” or don’t sound authentically “British”.

    Also, even without that explanation from my POV, one can see in his words, assuming of course that these are his words, (I don’t think that’s in doubt) that he speaks of “people from other countries” and how that would make “British identity” disappear.

    Now, that on its own MIGHT mean some nationalistic appeal to those who merely behave in a way that is sympathetic to the UK, in the same way that a dissident would not be a “true Briton”.

    Sadly this is not so, for his later quote about hearing “every accent under the sun apart from the British accent” clarifies his statements to show his true meaning: His Britain doesn’t have room for other peoples and cultures, especially if they sound funny.

    <<<<<>>>>>>

    E.Castle, I do not share your disdain for critical argument and questioning of important issues. I cannot understand, why you suppose that we are giving “zero tolerance”, or how we are engaging in any form of “political correctness”.

    It baffles the mind and frustrates the spirit to see you, an eloquent writer with a seemingly critical mind and a wealth of intellectual possibility, would go down the (intellectually dishonest at best and ignorant at worst) road of using the horrid fable of ‘political correctness’, a rightwing Frankenstein of terms, to make a case that we are somehow “shutting the door” on discussion or progress on this issue by merely criticizing the very issue that we plainly see in front of us.

    Who are we to give tolerance to, and secondly, when was it not given? Also, what are we supposing is absolutely ‘correct’, and what political power are exerting on those who do not toe that line? These seem like obvious questions to your critique meant not to provoke ire, but real reflection on the words we utter.

    This questioning and criticism is not supposed to STOP discussion, it STARTS discussion, and that’s the tragedy of ‘political correctness’ as a term, its sole purpose is to stop discussion of issues like race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and other issues of basic inequality around the world. That is the aim of the term.

    It is an illogical appeal to free speech rights for nationalists, reactionaries, bigots and zealots, which are as of now unattacked, against a far-left conspiracy or at least a leftist conspiratorial nature that does not exist in most any leftist I’ve met, and against super-powerful groups of POC, women, GLBT people, religious minorities, etc., that we acknowledge as having been long oppressed by the power-wielding sects of Western society. The fallacy of each and EVERY appeal in political correctness is that the conditions for them to be true do not exist.

    In fact, it’s at least in part because those conditions not only DON’T exist, but are completely reversed, (Voluminous voice for privileged, extensive rightwing media spin machine from blogs to 24 hour news to international talk radio, extra-powerful rightwing factions that actually do use political power to punish dissidents) that the oppressed people become “PC” when they are further socially oppressed and ostracized. That’s part of why this is so frustrating to see you write, and I hope if you are not glad to read this, you are at least frustrated enough with me that you can write back and we can have the discussion we both so want.

  21. jd wrote:

    Gregory - I wasn’t calling you a jack-ass. In fact I totally agree with you. It’s Morrissey I was inviting to go to other parts of Britain and pull that crap. (I don’t know if the racists are trying to conflate the term or just so arrogant that they ignore the rest of the island, but it sure does piss people off either way)

    Yolanda - Thanks for helping me out here. I’m still new to posting and sometimes I miss ways in which I could be misunderstood.

  22. K.D. wrote:

    Yeah, I loved Morrissey & the Smiths back in the day, but he’s just racist,that’s all. What kills me about British folks is they practically invaded every country they could, shoving their culture down the throats of everyone they invaded, and their empire was pretty built of the back of the cheap labor they turned said countries population into. Yet when those same people of color who were indoctrinated with that “white Britain is more superior” ideology came to Britain to make better lives for themselves, they got told they didn’t belong there and kicked to the curb. understand there are problems with immigration in Britain today,particularly since the bombing a couple of years back, but,damn, every country goes through that–I think he just can’t accept the reality that Britain isn’t an-all white country anymore. And he’s got a lot of nerve talking about immigrants when he himself is one—he seems to think because he’s white that that just automaticlaay removes him from the immigrant catagory? Plus, ALL immigrants aren’t people of color—he’s just getting old & cranky—well,actually he was cranky when he was younger,regardless.

  23. Kaonashi wrote:

    Morrissey annoys me at times, but I wouldn’t exactly trust anything the NME has to say either.

  24. Orville wrote:

    I go back and forth with Morrissey. I have a love hate relationship with him. On the one hand I think Morrissey is a very talented musician. On the other hand sometimes he comes across as a very prejudiced person. I have to admit I don’t listen to Morrissey that much as I used to compared to when I was a teenager. It was kind of sad really to actually read up on Morrissey and read about the incredibly racist and ignorant statements he has made. It is kind of sad to look up to someone and then realize this person let you down.

  25. Ms. Four wrote:

    What’s this about Morrissey talking about Ethiopia?

  26. Jones Not Smiths wrote:

    Mrs. Four: I believe “Ethiopia” refers to his (in)famous comments regarding Band Aid froma Mar 85 interview in Time Out

    http://foreverill.com/interviews/1985/charming.htm

    Provocative fellow, but while I’ve never favored him or the Smiths, I see a distinction among saying things about “immigration”, “immigrants”, a particular policy for/against, etc.

    I disagree with Moz and find most of what he says unberable, but I’m less eager to brand him racist for what he said. This isn’t because of his eclectic brand of progressivism, it’s because I don’t believe his detractors will ever hold others or themselves to same standard when it comes to the next situation.

    Moz has been consistent and unwavering on this point since his Smiths days, and that he should be more vocal and reactionary as he gets older and crankier, the society gets more diverse, the economy gets dicier, etc shouldn’t surprise, just as there are interest that push for wider doors and diversity. What’s interesting to hear are the other voices of color opposed to recent waves of immigrants, especially from the “mother country”, who agree with the “white xenophobes” for the same reason. If opposing or merely broaching the topic brands racist, what if you’re of the same race– a sell-out?

    And the purpose of “24-hour racist labelmakers”? To see if something sticks or to actually solve something? Bring lots of salt if “racism” is the best charge in lieu of real policy critiques or solutions anyone or either side can bring to the table. Otherwise listen to real people helping those who want come in and stay and those who want to help them, not race haters and baiters and deflaters in-between.

    As for conquest, “closed doors”, and conflict– that’s the way of the world. Fortunately not for every nation and society there’s ever been, but c’mon, how many nation’s hands are clean ?!?

  27. michael wrote:

    What I find sad is the great lengths some people will go to, when making excuses for their tarnished idols.

    Morrissey is, and has been a racist for years. People are arguing over semantics (british/english), instead of dealing with the clarity of what he actually said.

  28. squidfly wrote:

    The Problem with the English is they have no sense of their own History, because it was made abroad.
    Salman Rushdie

  29. squidfly wrote:

    Jones Not Smiths wrote:
    Moz has been consistent and unwavering on this point since his Smiths days, and that he should be more vocal and reactionary as he gets older and crankier, the society gets more diverse, the economy gets dicier, etc shouldn’t surprise, just as there are interest that push for wider doors and diversity. What’s interesting to hear are the other voices of color opposed to recent waves of immigrants, especially from the “mother country”, who agree with the “white xenophobes” for the same reason. If opposing or merely broaching the topic brands racist, what if you’re of the same race– a sell-out?

    How do impotent white men struggle to be potent once again?
    They look to the words of Goebbels, i.e. O’Reilly, Limbaugh, Imus, Savage, Coulter, Hannity, Giuliani, Rove…
    Morrisey’s music sucks anyway, Miles Davis leaves him in the dust.
    Provocation =Desperation

  30. ones Not Smiths wrote:

    Squidfly: Feel free to quote liberally, as long as you do so accurately…

    (Paraphrasing): For someone who’s been as consistently cranky as Moz, it should not be surprising to hear more from him as he perceives his social order changing past a level of comfort, and society/nation as a whole hitting a rough patch (economically, politically, etc).

    Explanation doesn’t justify the offensive comments, just puts them on the ground.

  31. jd wrote:

    Michael - I assume the “semantics” comment was directed at me, since I criticized Morrisey for treating British and English as interchangable. I’m actually not a fan and I agree that what he said was clearly racist. I also think his use of the words is quite telling. It’s not just semantics, it’s how he sees the world and who he does and doesn’t really see or acknowledge.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.